Next Article in Journal
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hypereutectic Al-High Si Alloys up to 70 wt.% Si-Content Produced from Pre-Alloyed and Blended Powder via Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Previous Article in Journal
Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Adsorption for Aromatic Hydrocarbon Model Systems via a Coagulation Process with a Ferric Sulfate–Lime Softening System
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 2
10.3390/ma16020656
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Anti-Oxidation Agents to Prevent Dye Degradation in Organic-Based Host–Guest Systems Suitable for Luminescent Solar Concentrators

by
Francesca Villafiorita-Monteleone
,
Mariacecilia Pasini
* and
Chiara Botta
*
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche “Giulio Natta” (SCITEC), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Sede Via A. Corti 12, 20133 Milano, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(2), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020656
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) have been extensively studied as they offer a practical solution to increase the efficiency of silicon-based photovoltaics (PVs). In this context, the use of natural and organic luminescent materials is desirable in order to obtain sustainable and environmentally friendly devices. Moreover, solution-processable organic host–guest systems based on Foerster Resonant Energy Transfer (FRET) processes offer the possibility to exploit a low-cost technique to obtain an efficient energy downshift from the UV–visible to red or deep red emissions in order to concentrate the radiation in the area of maximum efficiency of the PV device. Nevertheless, organic materials are subjected to photodegradation that reduces their optical properties when exposed to UV light and oxygen. In this work, we incorporated two different antioxidant molecules (i.e., octadecyl 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate (Octa) and L-ascorbic acid (L-Asc)) in a three-dye host–guest system and studied the corresponding optical properties after prolonged irradiation times in air. It was found that the presence of the antioxidants, especially L-Asc, slowed the system’s photodegradation down whilst at the same time retaining high emission efficiencies and without interfering with the cascade Resonant Energy Transfer processes among the dyes inserted in the nanochannels of the host.

1. Introduction

As the human population grows, the development of sustainable, affordable and environmentally friendly energy production is crucial. Renewable energy, especially solar photovoltaic (PV) technology, provides the possibility for solving resource and environmental issues with the advantage of zero CO2 emissions [1,2,3]. Unfortunately, the cost of generating electricity from silicon solar cells remains high [4], not to mention that the waste generated during their production and after their end-of-life hurts the environment and cannot be ignored [5].
Luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) are a widely studied and viable solution to the fabrication of sustainable and cheap PV systems characterized by high transparency, light weight, limited costs, synthetic versatility, high absorption coefficients and an ability to capture both incident and diffuse light [6,7,8]. Moreover, they can be fully integrated into architectural elements and become part of a building’s skin unit [9,10,11].
Basically, an LSC is a coating of luminescent materials consisting of dopants dispersed in an optically transparent host material (i.e., polymer matrices or glass substrates) acting as optical waveguide, in which the luminescent materials absorb both direct and indirect sunlight and then emit downshifted photons through a photoluminescence (PL) process (usually fluorescence) [6,12]. A large portion of the emitted light is concentrated via Total Internal Reflection (TIR) to the edges of the LSC, where a strip of PV cells may be attached, to collect the emitted light and convert it to an electrical current [13]. In this way, the possibility of concentrating the light radiation through Energy Transfer (ET) processes in the area of maximum efficiency of the device allows the minimizing of the size of the solar cells, with a consequent benefit in terms of production costs and environmental impact.
Up to now, various luminescent materials have been used as dopants, such as organic dyes [14,15,16,17], metal clusters [18,19], inorganic quantum dots [20,21,22,23,24], perovskites nanocrystals [25,26] and, more recently, carbon dots [27,28].
Despite the simple design and much needed applications, the widespread use of LSCs is still challenging, predominantly due to the photodegradation of both matrices and luminophores [6,29,30,31,32] and the reduced device efficiency, which in turn is linked to various light-loss processes [6,33,34,35].
In this context, potential approaches to minimize the absorption losses include the use of fluorescent dyes with a tunable Stokes shift [8,16,36,37], the use of luminophores with Aggregation-Induced Emission (AIE) properties [38,39] and, mostly, the use of organic or hybrid host–guest systems and the exploitation of Foerster Resonant Energy Transfer (FRET) processes, since they allow a significant improvement in the light-absorption efficiency while, at the same time, reducing reabsorption losses [40,41,42,43,44,45].
At the same time, to reduce the undesirable degradation effects of solar radiation on the luminophores, several approaches have been considered, ranging from the deliberate structural modification of dyes to the use of protective agents of various kinds. A variety of additives have been commercially developed, which can be used either before, during or after the incorporation of the dye in the device. Such additives may protect the dye, the matrix or, ideally, both [46,47].
In this work, we present a study on the photostability of deoxycholic acid (DCA)-based host–guest materials containing three linear dyes (Figure 1a) (diphenylhexatriene (DPH) emitting in the blue (Figure 1b), 4,7-di(2-thienyl)-benzo[1–3]thiadiazole (DBT) emitting in the green (Figure 1c), and 4,7-bis(5′-hexyl-2,2′-bithienyl-5-yl)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (DBTT) emitting in the red (Figure 1d)) for the development of photostable LSCs.
These systems have previously been demonstrated to be able to shift the near UV and visible light to the deep red with a very high efficiency, thanks to controlled FRET processes among the dyes inserted in the nanochannels characteristic of a DCA organic host [42,48]. Here, we exposed thin films of these materials to prolonged irradiation in order to test their performances in LSC devices.
To avoid the photodegradation of the systems, we added some antioxidant molecules and studied the effect of their presence on the materials’ optical properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Deoxycholic acid (DCA), 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH), octadecyl 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate (Octa) and L-ascorbic acid (L-Asc) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. 4,7-Di(2-thienyl)-benzo[1–3]thiadiazole (DBT) and 4,7-bis-(5′-hexyl-2,2′-bithienyl-5-yl)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (DBTT) were synthesized as reported elsewhere [49,50,51]. All solvents were of analytical grade.
The DCA mother solution was prepared with a concentration of about 10−2 M, and antioxidant and dye mother solutions were prepared with a concentration of about 7 × 10−3 M in THF. Reference samples were prepared by mixing DCA and dye mother solutions in order to prepare co-inclusions with the following ratios: DCA:DPH=3:1 and DPH:DBT:DBTT = 96.9:2.9:0.2. Antioxidant mother solutions with a concentration of about 2 × 10−3 M in THF were mixed with co-inclusion mother solutions in order to have DBT:antioxidant concentrations of 90 and 10, 80 and 20 and 95 and 5 wt.%.
Films of DCA inclusion compounds with and without antioxidants were obtained by spin-coating the corresponding solutions at 500 rpm for 60 s on 2 × 2 cm2 quartz substrates. The resulting films had a thickness of about 150–200 nm.

2.2. Optical Characterization

PL measurements on solid state samples in air at room temperature were obtained with a SPEX 270 M monochromator equipped with a N2-cooled charge-coupled device excited with a monochromated Xe lamp. The spectra were corrected for the instrument response. PL quantum yields (QYs) (The Photoluminescence Quantum Yield of a molecule or material is defined as the number of photons emitted as a fraction of the number of photons absorbed [52]) of solid state materials were obtained by using a homemade integrating sphere and by correcting the spectra for the background of the exciting lamp according to [48].
For accelerated photodegradation experiments, all samples were subjected to continuous illumination in air by means of a UV-lamp (Hamamatsu L9566 series) with a 300–400 nm band-pass excitation filter at a 30 mm distance, where the lamp intensity was about 410 mW/cm2 (Scheme 1).
Fluorescence spectra were collected after each period of exposure (0, 5, 10, 30, 45, 60, 80, 90, 105, 120, 180, 300, 480, 960, 1800, 3600 s) with the above-mentioned apparatus. The photodegradation was followed by monitoring the decrease in the overall emission and/or in each dye emission band (i.e., in the 400–475 nm range for DPH, in the 475–585 nm range for DBT and in the 585–750 nm range for DBTT). The decrease in the emission intensity for both the DCA-DPH:DBT and the DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT samples was analyzed, with a bi-exponential fit with and without antioxidants.

3. Results and Discussion

As previously reported, thin films of organic host–guest systems based on the use of DCA, obtained from bovine bile, as the host involve the use of sustainable and natural components and can be obtained with low-cost self-assembly technology [42,48].
These materials can be used to obtain films with a three-dye system able to efficiently downshift the near-UV-visible light to deep red thanks to controlled FRET processes, in order to develop LSCs with reduced energy consumption [42]. Moreover, to obtain such highly efficient host–guest systems, it is sufficient to use a small amount of DBT with respect to DPH to shift the system’s emissions from blue to green, and thus to use an even smaller quantity of DBTT with respect to DBT to shift the emission from green to red, as demonstrated elsewhere [42].
As shown in Figure 1b–d, the three dyes were characterized by optical properties ideal for a cascade FRET process to shift the energy from the near-UV (DPH absorption) region to the green (DBT emission) region and, finally, to the deep red (DBTT emission) region. This system worked because the absorption of each acceptor overlapped with the emission of each donor, and the relative Foerster radii led to an efficient funneling from the UV region to the deep red region through a multi-step FRET process (DPH → DPH, DPH → DBT, DPH → DBTT and DBT → DBTT) [42].
Indeed, the thin films of co-inclusions of DPH, DBT and DBTT in DCA showed emissions from all chromophores when the DPH was excited (Figure 2). It was, in fact, possible to recognize the emission bands of each dye: DPH presented an emission peak in the 400–475 nm range, DBT in the 475–585 nm range and DBTT in the 585–750 nm range.
One major drawback against the wide diffusion of organic systems such as the one just described is the photostability of the materials that unfortunately are subjected to degradation when exposed to UV light and oxygen. The inclusion of organic dyes into a DCA host is expected to protect the dyes from photodegradation, since the host reduces their exposure to oxygen [42,48]. Thus, to assess their use in LSC devices, we performed an accelerated aging test on host–guest thin films by exposing them to prolonged irradiation in air. Aging the films with a UV lamp in air induced an emission quenching, as shown in Figure 3, where the emission spectra of the bare DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT films are compared for increasing irradiation times.
It is possible to notice an evident quenching in the overall fluorescence intensity with increasing light exposure times, even though some differences can be highlighted. Specifically, a sharp emission decrease was observed for the peaks associated with DBT and DBTT (in the 475–585 nm and 585–750 nm ranges, respectively (Figure 2)) in the host–guest system, whereas a slower and less pronounced reduction in the PL intensity was detected for the peak associated with DPH (in the 400–475 nm range, Figure 2). This behavior is better highlighted in Figure 4, where the changes in the emission intensities are reported as the ratio between the emission intensity measured after a specific time interval (I) and the initial emission intensity (I0).
These different quenching behaviors could be due to the differences in the chemical structures of the chromophores. In fact, thiophene-based materials are more easily subjected to photooxidation, as previously reported [53,54,55,56]. Indeed, the presence of thiophene groups in both DBT and DBTT leads to a larger number of sites ideal for oxidative reactions.
To assess the role of the antioxidants on the overall stability, we started with DCA-DPH:DBT co-inclusion compounds and evaluated the effect of different additive concentrations (5 wt.%, 10 wt.% and 20 wt.% with respect to the DBT concentration). We chose two different antioxidant molecules: octadecyl 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate (Octa) and L-ascorbic acid (L-Asc) (Scheme 2). The former is a synthetic antioxidant, largely used in plastics and food packaging [57] and is large enough to act as stopcock by inserting its long alkyl chain inside the host channel and blocking the entrance thanks to the bulky benzene derivative [58,59]. The latter is the L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid, a natural water-soluble vitamin, small enough to enter the DCA nano-channels and suitable for green chemistry [60].
We exposed the host–guest systems in air to UV light for increasing time intervals and monitored the photodegradation of the organic components by means of fluorescence spectroscopy.
As shown in Figure 5, after different irradiation times, almost all the additive concentrations led to an improvement in the resistance to photodegradation when compared with the bare sample. According to the experiment, the best results were achieved with a concentration of 10 wt.% for both antioxidants: higher antioxidants concentrations had a negative or no effect because of the changes in the FRET process.
The comparison of the decay times (Table 1), obtained as averages of the bi-exponential fits, confirmed the choice of using 10 wt.% of additive as the best-performing anti-oxidant concentration.
Thus, for the complete systems characterized by the co-inclusion of the three dyes, we considered the addition of 10 wt.% of L-Asc or Octa. Figure 6 shows the degradation of all the samples’ emissions as a function of different UV light irradiation times. In addition, for the complete system, the presence of L-Asc seemed to reduce the photodegradation with respect to both the bare system and the sample with Octa. In fact, after 1h of irradiation in accelerated photodegradation conditions, the intensity was still 85%. Moreover, as reported in Table 2, the lifetime increased from 5.9 h to 12.1 h with the addition of 10 wt.% L-Asc to the DCA matrix. This result might be due to the fact that L-Asc is a small molecule that penetrates the DCA nanochannels and performs its antioxidant function within close proximity of the dyes [60].
To further assess the role of the antioxidant molecules added to the co-inclusion compounds as means for improving the photostability, we compared the additive-containing systems to bare co-inclusions prepared in an oxygen-free environment and then subjected them to UV irradiation in air. Figure 7 shows the PL emission intensity ratios of the DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT samples prepared in air or in an inert atmosphere and of the systems containing L-Asc or Octa prepared in air.
As shown in the following plot and in Table 2, the presence of L-Asc led to an initial lower photodegradation when compared to the bare samples prepared in the absence of oxygen, showing an emission loss of a maximum of 25% despite being prepared in air. As stated above, this might be due to the small dimensions of this particular antioxidant that easily penetrates inside the DCA nanochannels and performs its role in eliminating reactive oxygen species directly in situ [60].
Finally, we performed a last aging test, exposing all the samples to air and natural light for one week and measuring their absolute PL QYs before and after UV exposure. Table 3 shows the values for the bare samples prepared either in the absence of oxygen or in air and for the additive-containing systems prepared in air, before and after the aging experiments. Once again, the samples prepared with 10 wt.% of L-Asc showed the best results, with no emission losses whatsoever. This result demonstrates that the inclusion of L-Asc as an anti-oxidation agent in DCA films containing three organic dyes reduced the emission-quenching processes typical of organic materials, allowing the preparation of thin films from solutions in air with simple and low-cost techniques.

4. Conclusions

We studied the possibility of increasing the photostability of organic host–guest systems suitable for LSC applications by comparing two different antioxidant molecules: octadecyl 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate (Octa), a synthetic antioxidant, largely used in plastics and food, and L-ascorbic acid (L-Asc), a natural water-soluble vitamin found in fruit and vegetables. In particular, the use of L-Asc enables the obtaining of natural and environmentally friendly compounds and the improvement of the system’s photostability without recurring to encapsulation or preparation procedures involving an inert atmosphere, thus following a very simple and low-cost technique (i.e., deposition in air of solutions containing the different compounds) for the production of organic thin films compatible with the realization of low-cost LSCs.
Although this work is in its infancy, these values and the stability of the presented systems as optically active materials are a promising starting point for the development of sustainable and stable LSCs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.V.-M., M.P. and C.B.; data analysis, F.V.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.V.-M.; writing—review and editing, F.V.-M., M.P. and C.B.; supervision, M.P. and C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by Fondazione Cariplo, through the project “Functional carbon dots for ENhancing tomato production In a Circular Economy scheme (FENICE)”, grant number 2021-0626.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not require any ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article and in ref. [42].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gürtürk, M. Economic Feasibility of Solar Power Plants Based on PV Module with Levelized Cost Analysis. Energy 2019, 171, 866–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alaaeddin, M.H.; Sapuan, S.M.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Zainudin, E.S.; Al-Oqla, F.M. Photovoltaic Applications: Status and Manufacturing Prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 102, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Almosni, S.; Delamarre, A.; Jehl, Z.; Suchet, D.; Cojocaru, L.; Giteau, M.; Behaghel, B.; Julian, A.; Ibrahim, C.; Tatry, L.; et al. Material Challenges for Solar Cells in the Twenty-First Century: Directions in Emerging Technologies. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2018, 19, 336–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cui, Y.; Lieber, C.M. Functional Nanoscale Electronic Devices Assembled Using Silicon Nanowire Building Blocks. Science 2001, 291, 851–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Qi, L.; Zhang, Y. Effects of Solar Photovoltaic Technology on the Environment in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 22133–22142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Debije, M.G.; Verbunt, P.P.C. Thirty Years of Luminescent Solar Concentrator Research: Solar Energy for the Built Environment. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 12–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Papakonstantinou, I.; Portnoi, M.; Debije, M.G. The Hidden Potential of Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2002883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mazzaro, R.; Vomiero, A. The Renaissance of Luminescent Solar Concentrators: The Role of Inorganic Nanomaterials. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Castillo, M.S.; Liu, X.; Abd-AlHamid, F.; Connelly, K.; Wu, Y. Intelligent Windows for Electricity Generation: A Technologies Review. Build. Simul. 2022, 15, 1747–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Meinardi, F.; Bruni, F.; Brovelli, S. Luminescent Solar Concentrators for Building-Integrated Photovoltaics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, C.; Liu, D.; Renny, A.; Kuttipillai, P.S.; Lunt, R.R. Integration of Near-Infrared Harvesting Transparent Luminescent Solar Concentrators onto Arbitrary Surfaces. J. Lumin. 2019, 210, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Sark, W.G.J.H.M.; Barnham, K.W.J.; Slooff, L.H.; Chatten, A.J.; Büchtemann, A.; Meyer, A.; McCormack, S.J.; Koole, R.; Farrell, D.J.; Bose, R.; et al. Luminescent Solar Concentrators—A Review of Recent Results. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 21773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, R.; Luscombe, C.K. Review on the Role of Polymers in Luminescent Solar Concentrators. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2019, 57, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Rondão, R.; Frias, A.R.; Correia, S.F.H.; Fu, L.; de Zea Bermudez, V.; André, P.S.; Ferreira, R.A.S.; Carlos, L.D. High-Performance Near-Infrared Luminescent Solar Concentrators. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12540–12546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, B.; Zhao, P.; Wilson, L.J.; Subbiah, J.; Yang, H.; Mulvaney, P.; Jones, D.J.; Ghiggino, K.P.; Wong, W.W.H. High-Performance Large-Area Luminescence Solar Concentrator Incorporating a Donor–Emitter Fluorophore System. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 1839–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Corsini, F.; Tatsi, E.; Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Botta, C.; Turri, S.; Griffini, G. Highly Emissive Fluorescent Silica-Based Core/Shell Nanoparticles for Efficient and Stable Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Nano Energy 2021, 80, 105551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lyu, G.; Kendall, J.; Meazzini, I.; Preis, E.; Bayseç, S.; Scherf, U.; Clément, S.; Evans, R.C. Luminescent Solar Concentrators Based on Energy Transfer from an Aggregation-Induced Emitter Conjugated Polymer. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 3039–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Correia, S.F.H.; De Zea Bermudez, V.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; André, P.S.; Ferreira, R.A.S.; Carlos, L.D. Luminescent Solar Concentrators: Challenges for Lanthanide-Based Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 5580–5596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nolasco, M.M.; Vaz, P.M.; Freitas, V.T.; Lima, P.P.; André, P.S.; Ferreira, R.A.S.; Vaz, P.D.; Ribeiro-Claro, P.; Carlos, L.D. Engineering Highly Efficient Eu(III)-Based Tri-Ureasil Hybrids toward Luminescent Solar Concentrators. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 7339–7350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, K.; Li, H.; Klimov, V.I. Tandem Luminescent Solar Concentrators Based on Engineered Quantum Dots. Nat. Photonics 2018, 12, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sadeghi, S.; Bahmani Jalali, H.; Melikov, R.; Ganesh Kumar, B.; Mohammadi Aria, M.; Ow-Yang, C.W.; Nizamoglu, S. Stokes-Shift-Engineered Indium Phosphide Quantum Dots for Efficient Luminescent Solar Concentrators. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 12975–12982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bergren, M.R.; Makarov, N.S.; Ramasamy, K.; Jackson, A.; Guglielmetti, R.; McDaniel, H. High-Performance CuInS2 Quantum Dot Laminated Glass Luminescent Solar Concentrators for Windows. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gong, X.; Jiang, H.; Cao, M.; Rao, Z.; Zhao, X.; Vomiero, A. Eu-Doped ZnO Quantum Dots with Solid-State Fluorescence and Dual Emission for High-Performance Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 4746–4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Selopal, G.S.; Mohammadnezhad, M.; Besteiro, L.V.; Cavuslar, O.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Navarro-Pardo, F.; Liu, G.; Wang, M.; Durmusoglu, E.G.; et al. Synergistic Effect of Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles Decorated Carbon Nanotubes in Quantum Dots/TiO2 for Optoelectronic Devices. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2001864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cheng, Y.; Ding, L. Perovskite/Si Tandem Solar Cells: Fundamentals, Advances, Challenges, and Novel Applications. SusMat 2021, 1, 324–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wei, M.; de Arquer, F.P.G.; Walters, G.; Yang, Z.; Quan, L.N.; Kim, Y.; Sabatini, R.; Quintero-Bermudez, R.; Gao, L.; Fan, J.Z.; et al. Ultrafast Narrowband Exciton Routing within Layered Perovskite Nanoplatelets Enables Low-Loss Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Xin, W.; Cao, W.; Li, J.; Chen, M.; Jiang, X.; Wang, J.; Sun, Z. Highly Emissive Carbon Dots/Organosilicon Composites for Efficient and Stable Luminescent Solar Concentrators. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 1781–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gong, X.; Zheng, S.; Zhao, X.; Vomiero, A. Engineering High-Emissive Silicon-Doped Carbon Nanodots towards Efficient Large-Area Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Nano Energy 2022, 101, 107617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Griffini, G.; Levi, M.; Turri, S. Novel High-Durability Luminescent Solar Concentrators Based on Fluoropolymer Coatings. Prog. Org. Coatings 2014, 77, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Griffini, G.; Brambilla, L.; Levi, M.; Del Zoppo, M.; Turri, S. Photo-Degradation of a Perylene-Based Organic Luminescent Solar Concentrator: Molecular Aspects and Device Implications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2013, 111, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanaka, N.; Barashkov, N.; Heath, J.; Sisk, W.N. Photodegradation of Polymer-Dispersed Perylene Di-Imide Dyes. Appl. Opt. 2006, 45, 3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Earp, A.A.; Rawling, T.; Franklin, J.B.; Smith, G.B. Perylene Dye Photodegradation Due to Ketones and Singlet Oxygen. Dye. Pigment. 2010, 84, 59–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Krumer, Z.; Pera, S.J.; van Dijk-Moes, R.J.A.; Zhao, Y.; de Brouwer, A.F.P.; Groeneveld, E.; van Sark, W.G.J.H.M.; Schropp, R.E.I.; de Mello Donegá, C. Tackling Self-Absorption in Luminescent Solar Concentrators with Type-II Colloidal Quantum Dots. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2013, 111, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Mateen, F.; Lee, S.Y.; Hong, S.-K. Luminescent Solar Concentrators Based on Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Dyes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 3708–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xu, L.; Yao, Y.; Bronstein, N.D.; Li, L.; Alivisatos, A.P.; Nuzzo, R.G. Enhanced Photon Collection in Luminescent Solar Concentrators with Distributed Bragg Reflectors. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Huang, J.; Zhou, J.; Haraldsson, T.; Clemments, A.; Fujii, M.; Sugimoto, H.; Xu, B.; Sychugov, I. Triplex Glass Laminates with Silicon Quantum Dots for Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Sol. RRL 2020, 4, 2000195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, C.; Zhang, J.; Peng, W.-T.; Sheng, W.; Liu, D.; Kuttipillai, P.S.; Young, M.; Donahue, M.R.; Levine, B.G.; Borhan, B.; et al. Impact of Stokes Shift on the Performance of Near-Infrared Harvesting Transparent Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Corsini, F.; Nitti, A.; Tatsi, E.; Mattioli, G.; Botta, C.; Pasini, D.; Griffini, G. Large-Area Semi-Transparent Luminescent Solar Concentrators Based on Large Stokes Shift Aggregation-Induced Fluorinated Emitters Obtained Through a Sustainable Synthetic Approach. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2100182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Banal, J.L.; White, J.M.; Ghiggino, K.P.; Wong, W.W.H. Concentrating Aggregation-Induced Fluorescence in Planar Waveguides: A Proof-of-Principle. Sci. Rep. 2015, 4, 4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Delgado-Sanchez, J.-M. Luminescent Solar Concentrators: Photo-Stability Analysis and Long-Term Perspectives. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 202, 110134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mateen, F.; Hwang, T.G.; Boesel, L.F.; Choi, W.J.; Kim, J.P.; Gong, X.; Park, J.M.; Hong, S. Luminescent Solar Concentrator Utilizing Energy Transfer Paired Aggregation-induced Emissive Fluorophores. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 17971–17981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Botta, C.; Betti, P.; Pasini, M. Organic Nanostructured Host–Guest Materials for Luminescent Solar Concentrators. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cappelli, A.; Villafiorita-Monteleone, F.; Grisci, G.; Paolino, M.; Razzano, V.; Fabio, G.; Giuliani, G.; Donati, A.; Mendichi, R.; Boccia, A.C.; et al. Highly Emissive Supramolecular Assemblies Based on π-Stacked Polybenzofulvene Hosts and a Benzothiadiazole Guest. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 7897–7905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huber, S.; Ruiz, A.Z.; Li, H.; Patrinoiu, G.; Botta, C.; Calzaferri, G. Optical Spectroscopy of Inorganic–Organic Host–Guest Nanocrystals Organized as Oriented Monolayers. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2007, 360, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Viani, L.; Tolbod, L.P.; Jazdzyk, M.; Patrinoiu, G.; Cordella, F.; Mura, A.; Bongiovanni, G.; Botta, C.; Beljonne, D.; Cornil, J.; et al. Spatial Control of 3D Energy Transfer in Supramolecular Nanostructured Host−Guest Architectures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 10566–10570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Karnjkar, Y.S.; Dinde, R.M.; Dinde, N.M.; Bawankar, K.N.; Hinge, S.P.; Mohod, A.V.; Gogate, P.R. Degradation of Magenta Dye Using Different Approaches Based on Ultrasonic and Ultraviolet Irradiations: Comparison of Effectiveness and Effect of Additives for Intensification. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015, 27, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moura, J.C.V.P.; Oliveira-Campos, A.M.F.; Griffiths, J. The Effect of Additives on the Photostability of Dyed Polymers. Dye. Pigment. 1997, 33, 173–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moreau, J.; Giovanella, U.; Bombenger, J.P.; Porzio, W.; Vohra, V.; Spadacini, L.; Di Silvestro, G.; Barba, L.; Arrighetti, G.; Destri, S.; et al. Highly Emissive Nanostructured Thin Films of Organic Host-Guests for Energy Conversion. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kitamura, C.; Tanaka, S.; Yamashita, Y. Design of Narrow-Bandgap Polymers. Syntheses and Properties of Monomers and Polymers Containing Aromatic-Donor and o-Quinoid-Acceptor Units. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sonar, P.; Singh, S.P.; Leclère, P.; Surin, M.; Lazzaroni, R.; Lin, T.T.; Dodabalapur, A.; Sellinger, A. Synthesis, Characterization and Comparative Study of Thiophene-Benzothiadiazole Based Donor-Acceptor-Donor (D-A-D) Materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 3228–3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sonar, P.; Singh, S.P.; Sudhakar, S.; Dodabalapur, A.; Sellinger, A. High-Mobility Organic Thin Film Transistors Based on Benzothiadiazole- Sandwiched Dihexylquaterthiophenes. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 3184–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lakowicz, J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy; Lakowicz, J.R., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-0-387-31278-1. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hintz, H.; Egelhaaf, H.J.; Peisert, H.; Chassé, T. Photo-Oxidation and Ozonization of Poly(3-Hexylthiophene) Thin Films as Studied by UV/VIS and Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 818–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhen, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Fu, M.; Fu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, J. Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation for Thiophene by Ag/α-MoO3 Heterojunction under Visible-Light Irradiation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 3672–3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Abdou, M.S.A.; Holdcroft, S. Mechanisms of Photodegradation of Poly(3-Alkylthiophenes) in Solution. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 2954–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Che, Y.; Niazi, M.R.; Izquierdo, R.; Perepichka, D.F. Mechanism of the Photodegradation of A-D-A Acceptors for Organic Photovoltaics. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 24833–24837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hermabessiere, L.; Dehaut, A.; Paul-Pont, I.; Lacroix, C.; Jezequel, R.; Soudant, P.; Duflos, G. Occurrence and Effects of Plastic Additives on Marine Environments and Organisms: A Review. Chemosphere 2017, 182, 781–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Vohra, V.; Devaux, A.; Dieu, L.-Q.; Scavia, G.; Catellani, M.; Calzaferri, G.; Botta, C. Energy Transfer in Fluorescent Nanofibers Embedding Dye-Loaded Zeolite L Crystals. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1146–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Calzaferri, G.; Huber, S.; Maas, H.; Minkowski, C. Host–Guest Antenna Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3732–3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xu, X.; Chueh, C.-C.; Yang, Z.; Rajagopal, A.; Xu, J.; Jo, S.B.; Jen, A.K.Y. Ascorbic Acid as an Effective Antioxidant Additive to Enhance the Efficiency and Stability of Pb/Sn-Based Binary Perovskite Solar Cells. Nano Energy 2017, 34, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 00656 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structures of DCA, DPH, DBT and DBTT. Absorption and photoluminescence spectra of (b) DPH in MeOH and (c) DBT and (d) DBTT in THF, with excitation wavelengths at 360 nm, 420 nm and 500 nm, respectively.
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structures of DCA, DPH, DBT and DBTT. Absorption and photoluminescence spectra of (b) DPH in MeOH and (c) DBT and (d) DBTT in THF, with excitation wavelengths at 360 nm, 420 nm and 500 nm, respectively.
Materials 16 00656 g001
Materials 16 00656 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Scheme of the optical setup used for the photodegradation experiments and fluorescence spectra collection.
Scheme 1. Scheme of the optical setup used for the photodegradation experiments and fluorescence spectra collection.
Materials 16 00656 sch001
Materials 16 00656 g002 550
Figure 2. PL emission spectrum of a DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT spin-coated film without any additives, with DPH:DBT:DBTT molar ratios of 96.9:2.9:0.2. The sample was excited at 360 nm.
Figure 2. PL emission spectrum of a DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT spin-coated film without any additives, with DPH:DBT:DBTT molar ratios of 96.9:2.9:0.2. The sample was excited at 360 nm.
Materials 16 00656 g002
Materials 16 00656 g003 550
Figure 3. PL emission spectra of the DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT films without any additives with different times of UV light irradiation (from 0 to 3600 s).
Figure 3. PL emission spectra of the DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT films without any additives with different times of UV light irradiation (from 0 to 3600 s).
Materials 16 00656 g003
Materials 16 00656 g004 550
Figure 4. PL emission intensity ratios of the DPH (square), DBT (circle) and DBTT (triangle) components of the inclusion compounds in DCA, without any additives, as a function of UV light exposition.
Figure 4. PL emission intensity ratios of the DPH (square), DBT (circle) and DBTT (triangle) components of the inclusion compounds in DCA, without any additives, as a function of UV light exposition.
Materials 16 00656 g004
Materials 16 00656 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Chemical structures of L-Asc (left) and Octa (right).
Scheme 2. Chemical structures of L-Asc (left) and Octa (right).
Materials 16 00656 sch002
Materials 16 00656 g005 550
Figure 5. PL emission intensity ratios of bare DCA-DPH:DBT (full black square) and DCA-DPH:DBT with 5 wt.% (full blue square), 10 wt.% (full red circle) and 20 wt.% (full green triangle) of Octa and with 5 wt.% (empty black diamond), 10 wt.% (solid pink triangle) and 20% (empty square) of L-Asc as a function of UV light exposition. Dotted lines are bi-exponential fits (see Table 1).
Figure 5. PL emission intensity ratios of bare DCA-DPH:DBT (full black square) and DCA-DPH:DBT with 5 wt.% (full blue square), 10 wt.% (full red circle) and 20 wt.% (full green triangle) of Octa and with 5 wt.% (empty black diamond), 10 wt.% (solid pink triangle) and 20% (empty square) of L-Asc as a function of UV light exposition. Dotted lines are bi-exponential fits (see Table 1).
Materials 16 00656 g005
Materials 16 00656 g006 550
Figure 6. PL emission intensity ratios of bare DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT (full black square) and DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT with 10 wt.% L-Asc (full blue circle) and 10 wt.% Octa (full red square) as a function of UV light exposition time. Dotted lines are bi-exponential fits (see Table 2).
Figure 6. PL emission intensity ratios of bare DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT (full black square) and DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT with 10 wt.% L-Asc (full blue circle) and 10 wt.% Octa (full red square) as a function of UV light exposition time. Dotted lines are bi-exponential fits (see Table 2).
Materials 16 00656 g006
Materials 16 00656 g007 550
Figure 7. PL emission intensity ratios of bare DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT prepared in inert atmosphere (full square) and in air (full circle) and DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT with 10 wt.% L-Asc (full triangle) and 10 wt.% Octa (empty square), both prepared in air, as a function of UV light exposition. Dotted lines are bi-exponential fits (see Table 2).
Figure 7. PL emission intensity ratios of bare DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT prepared in inert atmosphere (full square) and in air (full circle) and DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT with 10 wt.% L-Asc (full triangle) and 10 wt.% Octa (empty square), both prepared in air, as a function of UV light exposition. Dotted lines are bi-exponential fits (see Table 2).
Materials 16 00656 g007
Table
Table 1. Parameters of bi-exponential fits of the photodegradation aging tests and corresponding decay times for DCA-DPH:DBT samples with and without 5 wt.%, 10 wt.% and 20 wt.% of antioxidants (tav= ∑ n = 1 2 A n t n ∑ n = 1 2 A n ) .
Table 1. Parameters of bi-exponential fits of the photodegradation aging tests and corresponding decay times for DCA-DPH:DBT samples with and without 5 wt.%, 10 wt.% and 20 wt.% of antioxidants (tav= ∑ n = 1 2 A n t n ∑ n = 1 2 A n ) .
t1 (min)A1t2 (min)A2Adj. R-Squaretav (h)
DCA-DPH:DBT0.9260.23476.20.770.871956.121
5 wt.% Octa1.1910.18505.10.820.981736.868
10 wt.% Octa1.1910.18537.60.820.979877.368
20 wt.% Octa1.2350.25282.50.750.995583.533
5% L-Asc1.2350.185366.30.8150.993704.979
10% L-Asc1.5870.10555.60.900.989658.345
20% L-Asc1.2820.11656.20.890.975639.734
Table
Table 2. Parameters of bi-exponential fits and corresponding decay times of the photodegradation aging tests for DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT samples with and without 10 wt.% antioxidants, prepared in air or in an inert atmosphere (tav= ∑ n = 1 2 A n t n ∑ n = 1 2 A n ) .
Table 2. Parameters of bi-exponential fits and corresponding decay times of the photodegradation aging tests for DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT samples with and without 10 wt.% antioxidants, prepared in air or in an inert atmosphere (tav= ∑ n = 1 2 A n t n ∑ n = 1 2 A n ) .
t1 (min)A1t2 (min)A2Adj. R-Squaretav (h)
DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT1.3890.14411.50.860.981455.926
10 wt.% Octa2.0830.15340.10.850.99074.826
10 wt.% L-Asc7.5760.09793.70.910.9912412.10
DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT (inert atmosphere)1.2350.07957.90.940.9922314.93
Table
Table 3. PL QY values of as-prepared samples (either prepared in an oxygen-free atmosphere or in air) and after one week of air and light exposure, with and without antioxidants.
Table 3. PL QY values of as-prepared samples (either prepared in an oxygen-free atmosphere or in air) and after one week of air and light exposure, with and without antioxidants.
Inert Atmosphere1 Week OldAir1 Week Old
DCA-DPH:DBT:DBTT10.830.970.81
10 wt.% L-Asc--11
10 wt.% Octa--0.830.73
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Villafiorita-Monteleone, F.; Pasini, M.; Botta, C. Anti-Oxidation Agents to Prevent Dye Degradation in Organic-Based Host–Guest Systems Suitable for Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Materials 2023, 16, 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020656

AMA Style

Villafiorita-Monteleone F, Pasini M, Botta C. Anti-Oxidation Agents to Prevent Dye Degradation in Organic-Based Host–Guest Systems Suitable for Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Materials. 2023; 16(2):656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020656

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villafiorita-Monteleone, Francesca, Mariacecilia Pasini, and Chiara Botta. 2023. "Anti-Oxidation Agents to Prevent Dye Degradation in Organic-Based Host–Guest Systems Suitable for Luminescent Solar Concentrators" Materials 16, no. 2: 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020656

APA Style

Villafiorita-Monteleone, F., Pasini, M., & Botta, C. (2023). Anti-Oxidation Agents to Prevent Dye Degradation in Organic-Based Host–Guest Systems Suitable for Luminescent Solar Concentrators. Materials, 16(2), 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020656

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop