Next Article in Journal
Optimization of REBCO Tapes through Division and Striation for Use in Superconducting Cables with Low AC Losses
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Solidification Heat Transfer in Slab Continuous Casting Process Based on Different Roll Contact Calculation Methods
Previous Article in Journal
On the Analyses of Cure Cycle Effects on Peel Strength Characteristics in Carbon High-Tg Epoxy/Plasma-Activated Carbon PEEK Composite Interfaces: A Preliminary Inquiry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phase Stability and Slag-Induced Destabilization in MnO2 and CeO2-Doped Calcia-Stabilized Zirconia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 23
10.3390/ma16237341
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructural Characteristics and Material Failure Mechanism of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn Alloy

by
Yi-Jin Cheng
,
Fei-Yi Hung
* and
Jun-Ren Zhao
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(23), 7341; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237341
Submission received: 30 October 2023 / Revised: 21 November 2023 / Accepted: 23 November 2023 / Published: 25 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Characterization of Metallic Materials: Microstructure, Forming, and Heat Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study focuses on the additive manufacturing technique of selective laser melting (SLM) to produce Ti-6Al-4V-Zn titanium alloy. The addition of zinc at 0.3 wt.% was investigated to improve the strength and ductility of SLM Ti-6Al-4V alloys. The microstructure and mechanical properties were analyzed using different vacuum heat treatment processes, with the 800-4-FC specimen exhibiting the most favorable overall mechanical properties. Additionally, zinc serves as a stabilizing element for the β phase, enhancing the resistance to particle erosion and corrosion impedance of Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy. Furthermore, the incorporation of trace amounts of Zn imparts improved impact toughness and stabilized high-temperature tensile mechanical properties to SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy. The data obtained serve as valuable references for the application of SLM-64Ti.

1. Introduction

The advantage of additive manufacturing lies in its ability to customize products with complex shapes or unique structures while saving on tooling costs and material waste, thereby reducing production costs [1,2]. Currently, this technology has been widely applied in industries such as automotive, aerospace, and medical fields [2,3]. While additive manufacturing technology offers the above advantages, it is crucial to select appropriate processing technology and parameters to ensure the attainment of desirable properties [4,5]. In this study, Selective Laser Melting (SLM) was chosen as the additive manufacturing technology, using metal powder as the raw material [6]. The process involves melting the metal powder by high-energy laser scanning on a powder bed and rapidly cooling it to solidify into a specific shape [7,8]. The selected material is Ti-6Al-4V-Zn titanium alloy, which exhibits high strength-to-weight ratio, low elastic modulus, excellent corrosion resistance, and fatigue properties [9]. It is extensively used in industrial, aerospace, and medical applications [10], and is even employed in military applications [11]. With the development of modern industry, there is an increasing demand for titanium alloy products with higher dimensional accuracy and complex shapes. Therefore, the use of SLM as a forming technology for titanium alloys not only maintains the advantages of titanium alloys but also leverages the benefits of the SLM process, making it the preferred choice for industrial products. Furthermore, zinc metal is widely utilized across various industries. The addition of zinc elements and zinc coatings is prevalent in various fields, with galvanized coating being particularly common in industries due to its effective enhancement of corrosion and erosion resistance [12,13]. Moreover, the incorporation of trace amounts of zinc has been shown to enhance the strength, corrosion resistance, and processability of alloys [14,15,16]. Due to their similar hexagonal close-packed structures and electronegativity, the addition of zinc has minimal influence on the original Ti-6Al-4V alloy [17]. However, given the different atomic radii of Ti and Zn [18], it is important to note that the amount of added Zn should not be excessive.
In this study, zinc metal was chosen as an additive element in the Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy, and an investigation into the microstructure and mechanical properties of the resulting Ti-6Al-4V-Zn titanium alloy was conducted [19]. Given that parts or equipment made of titanium alloys are susceptible to corrosion and damage at the metal/solution interface when exposed to corrosive media [20], we also conducted corrosion resistance investigations. Different vacuum heat treatments were applied to improve the properties of the Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy and to explore the effects of high temperature and oxygen content on its properties [21]. Furthermore, erosion wear is the phenomenon of gas- or liquid-driven particles impacting the surface of a material [22,23]. In numerous industrial applications of titanium alloys, including automotive and aerospace sectors, erosional wear caused by solid particles can lead to the failure of mechanical equipment and parts [23,24]. Despite the significance of particle erosion wear, there is a scarcity of studies on the erosion wear of SLM Ti-6Al-4V, let alone the SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy investigated in this study. Therefore, it is crucial to establish particle erosion wear data and mechanisms for this alloy. Consequently, the changes in the structure, phase composition, and various properties of the alloy before and after particle erosion were examined [25,26]. Prior to this study, there were no related investigations on Ti-6Al-4V-Zn. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive study on the SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn titanium alloy to obtain an in-depth understanding of the impact of zinc addition on SLM T-6Al-4V material properties. The generated data can offer valuable references for engineering or military applications of SLM-64Ti [27].

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental material in this study is the Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy fabricated using selective laser melting (SLM). The powder, provided by Circle Metal Powder Co., Ltd. in Tainan, Taiwan, is illustrated in Figure 1 to showcase its morphology. The specimens were fabricated using an EOS M290 400 W machine manufactured by EOS in Krailling, Germany. The process parameters are presented in Table 1. The fabrication process took place in an inert gas (argon) atmosphere. The composition of the alloy elements is shown in Table 2, with a zinc content of 0.3 wt.%. According to the titanium-zinc alloy phase diagram [28], when the Zn content is 0.3 wt.%, α-Ti is the primary alloy phase rather than other titanium-zinc compounds. Additionally, the Zn content influences the phase transformation temperature of the titanium alloy. At this content, the phase transition temperature can be maintained between 800 and 900 °C. According to Chen et al. [29], the heat treatment at 850 °C leads to Ni3Ti precipitation and an increase in hardness, providing a basis for comparison with this study. Consisting of spherical particles with an average diameter of approximately 30 μm. Figure 2 illustrates the schematic and dimensions of the standard tensile specimens and erosion specimens obtained by wire-cutting the SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy. The specimens include an SD surface perpendicular to the laser incidence direction and an ND surface parallel to the laser incidence direction. The dimensions of the tensile specimens are 20 mm in length, 5 mm in width, and 3 mm in thickness. The erosion specimens measure 48 mm in length, 28 mm in width, and 4 mm in thickness.
After subjecting the SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn tensile specimens to different vacuum heat treatment processes (800 °C and 900 °C), the microstructure and phase composition were analyzed using optical microscopy (OM, OLYMPUS BX41M-LED, Tokyo, Japan), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, HITACHI SU-5000, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100F, Hillsboro, OR, USA), and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). The mechanical properties were evaluated using a Rockwell hardness tester (Rockwell hardness machine, RH, Mitutoyo, Kawasaki-shi, Japan), universal testing machine (HT-8336, Hung-Ta, Taichung, Taiwan), and impact testing machine (HT-8041A, Hung-Ta, Taichung, Taiwan). Fracture surfaces and sub-surfaces were examined, and the high-temperature effects, as well as the oxygen content effects, were investigated by considering variations in oxygen content among different batches of powder. Erosion experiments were conducted using alumina particles as shown in Figure 3a, and erosion properties of the SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn titanium alloy were analyzed using the schematic in Figure 3b [30]. The mechanical property differences after particle erosion were investigated by subjecting the tensile test specimens to double-sided erosion on the parallel portion, as shown in Figure 3c. Finally, the alloy polarization curves were measured and plotted to analyze the corrosion resistance properties. Based on multiple test results, application data for the SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn titanium alloy system were established.

3. Results and Discussion

In this study, the SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn titanium alloy, designated as the AS material, was used as the raw material. Figure 4 illustrates the microstructure of the ND and SD surfaces of the AS material. Both surfaces exhibit a needle-like microstructure, but the distribution on the ND surface is relatively more uniform. Therefore, the subsequent analysis of the heat-treated material focuses on the ND direction. The microstructure differs from the equiaxed primary β grain morphology observed in traditional cast Ti-6Al-4V alloy [31]. In comparison with the SLM Ti-6Al-4V alloy we previously studied [32], the needle-like phases in this study appear denser. Figure 5 shows the microstructure of the material after vacuum heat treatment at 800 °C. With increasing heat treatment time, the needle-like microstructure gradually transforms into a combination of needle-like and lamellar structures. The needle-like structure corresponds to the α phase, whereas the lamellar structure consists of alternating light-colored α phase and dark-colored β phase. Figure 6 displays the microstructure of the material after vacuum heat treatment at 900 °C, demonstrating an increased proportion of the lamellar structure with prolonged heat treatment time.
Figure 7 shows the XRD diffraction analysis of AS material, 800-4-FC material, and 900-4-FC material. In the AS material, only α-phase peaks are observed. In contrast, both α-phase and β-phase peaks are detected in the 800-4-FC and 900-4-FC materials. However, no zinc-related peaks are detected in all three samples, indicating that the zinc content (only 0.3 wt.%) is relatively low. Figure 8 focuses on the TEM analysis of the 800-4-FC material (as it exhibits the best overall mechanical properties). It shows the uniform distribution of titanium and aluminum, with vanadium clustering in the light-colored regions. The 0.3 wt.% of zinc is primarily in a uniform solid solution, with only a very small amount accumulating at specific locations, as seen in Figure 8 at point 1. On the other hand, Figure 8 at point 2 only detects titanium, aluminum, and vanadium, without detecting any zinc. The elemental contents at these two points are shown in Table 3. Further analysis of point 1 reveals that the dark-colored regions in Figure 9 correspond to α phase titanium, while the light-colored regions correspond to β phase titanium. It can be inferred that the majority of zinc is uniformly dissolved in the titanium, with only a small portion of zinc accumulating around the β phase near the grain boundaries of the needle-like α phase. This zinc accumulation prevents the transformation of the needle-like α phase to the lamellar α + β phase during heat treatment, indicating that zinc addition helps stabilize the β phase.
Figure 10 presents the mechanical property data of the AS material and various heat-treated materials. In Figure 10a, a comparison of hardness is presented, showing that the AS material has a higher hardness (HRC 45) compared to all heat-treated materials (HRC 40). Figure 10b–d displays the tensile property data. The AS material exhibits the highest strength but poor ductility. The 800-4-FC material demonstrates the best overall tensile properties, combining both strength and ductility. The main reason for this is the coexistence of the needle-like α phase and lamellar α + β phase in the microstructure, as shown in Figure 11. The 800-4-FC material exhibits the optimal ratio of the needle-like to layered α + β phases, resulting in a combination of strength and ductility. Therefore, subsequent analysis mainly focuses on the AS and 800-4-FC materials. Figure 12 shows the fracture surfaces of the AS and 800-4-FC materials after tensile testing. Both fracture surfaces exhibit a combination of dimple-like structures and flat cleavage surfaces. The samples with higher ductility display a higher proportion of dimple-like structures, whereas flat cleavage surfaces dominate in the less ductile samples. Overall, when compared to traditional casting and SLM Ti-6Al-4V alloy [31,32], the failure mechanism of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn is characterized by brittle dominance and poor ductility.
Figure 13 presents the impact values and fracture sub-surfaces of the AS and 800-4-FC materials. The fracture sub-surface of the AS material shows numerous sharp fracture surfaces indicating crack propagation paths, with longer crack propagation distances. On the other hand, the fracture surface of the 800-4-FC material, (Figure 14), exhibits a layered structure with perpendicular fracture cracks, which effectively hinders crack propagation [32].
Figure 15 displays the high-temperature tensile data of the AS material in the range of 250 °C to 400 °C. It can be observed that an increase in temperature leads to a decrease in strength and an improvement in ductility. Overall, the material still retains its applicability. Figure 16 illustrates the fracture surfaces of the AS material under high-temperature tensile testing. The proportion of dimple-like structures, which represents the ductile behavior of the material, increases with temperature. The size of the dimples is inversely proportional to the ductility. Moreover, the increase in temperature does not result in significant high-temperature oxidation effects in the AS material. The differences in fracture surfaces at different temperatures are minimal, indicating that the SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn titanium alloy can maintain stability at high temperatures [32].
Figure 17 presents the particle erosion weight loss rates of the AS material and the 800-4-FC material. Both materials exhibit peak erosion rates at 30° and the lowest rates at 90°. The erosion behavior in both cases is dominated by ductile deformation [30]. Moreover, for any erosion angle, the 800-4-FC material demonstrates lower erosion rates compared to the AS material. This indicates that the 800-4-FC material, which consists of a combination of the needle-like α phase and lamellar α + β phase, exhibits superior erosion resistance compared to the AS material, which consists only of the needle-like α phase. Furthermore, the erosion rates of SLM Ti-6Al-4V gradually decrease from 30° to 90°.
Figure 18 illustrates the XRD analysis of the AS material and the 800-4-FC material before and after particle erosion at 90°. The appearance of peaks corresponding to Al2O3 and Al3Ti can be observed. This is attributed to the reaction between the sample surface and the eroded particles during the particle erosion process, as the surface temperature of the sample can reach up to 500 °C [32]. It is also possible that residual eroded particles remain on the sample surface, leading to the formation of these new phases. Furthermore, the peaks corresponding to Al2O3 and Al3Ti are more pronounced in the AS-E material compared to the 800-4-FC-E material. This is attributed to the transformation of the microstructure into a combination of needle-like and lamellar structures after heat treatment, which effectively prevents the impact of particles. This mechanism has been reported in our previous study [32].
Observations were made on the eroded surfaces at 30° and 90° angles. After erosion at 30°, distinct and directional scratches were observed on the surface of the specimens, and localized plowing features were also present, as shown in Figure 19a,b. A comparison between the two angles revealed that the 800-4-FC material exhibited fewer surface scratches and plowing features. Similar observations were made on the sub-surface after erosion at 30°, as depicted in Figure 19c,d, with the sub-surface of the 800-4-FC material appearing relatively smoother, whereas the AS material exhibited more pronounced damage. For erosion at 90°, the eroded surfaces and sub-surfaces also exhibited less damage in the case of the 800-4-FC material. A comparison of the erosion surfaces in Figure 20a,b showed that the AS material exhibited more pits and larger scratched areas. On the other hand, in Figure 20c,d, which represents the sub-surfaces after 90° erosion, the AS material had narrower and deeper pits, whereas the 800-4-FC material had shallower and wider pits. The observations from Figure 19 and Figure 20 collectively show that the 800-4-FC material possesses superior erosion resistance properties [33].
Figure 21 illustrates the differences in tensile properties between the AS and 800-4-FC materials before and after particle erosion. Compared to the AS material, the 800-4-FC material exhibited less deterioration in tensile properties after erosion, although both materials experienced a decrease in tensile strength following the erosion process. Figure 22 displays the tensile fracture surfaces of the AS and 800-4-FC materials after erosion. The 800-4-FC material exhibited predominantly cleavage fracture, whereas the AS material showed only the localized regions of ductile dimples. The reduction in tensile properties can be attributed to the formation of new phases at high temperatures during particle erosion and the damage caused to the specimens during the erosion process.
Figure 23 presents the differences in impact values and impact fracture sub-surfaces of the AS and 800-4-FC materials before and after particle erosion. It can be observed that the impact values increased after erosion, but there were no significant differences in the crack propagation path compared to before erosion. The increase in energy absorption is attributed to the surface work hardening and the formation of a surface layer induced by particle erosion, which helps to absorb and disperse the impact energy [34].
Figure 24 compares the polarization curves of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn AS material and SLM Ti-6Al-4V AS material [35]. Zinc itself is a corrosion-resistant metal, and according to our TEM results (Figure 8 and Figure 9), most of the zinc in SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn is uniformly dissolved in titanium. Consequently, it effectively enhances corrosion resistance, resulting in a lower corrosion current density for SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy (0.029 A/cm2) compared to SLM Ti-6Al-4V alloy (0.039 A/cm2).
Based on several tests evaluating practical applicability and analyzing mechanisms, the 800-4-FC material demonstrates the best overall mechanical properties. It exhibits a combination of strength and ductility, maintains stability in high-temperature environments, and improves erosion and corrosion resistance compared to other materials.

4. Limitations

The influence of the phase transformation layer on the tensile and impact properties after particle erosion can be further studied, including the thickness, phase structure, and high-temperature stability of the phase transformation layer.

5. Conclusions

The microstructural characteristics of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn exhibit a uniform distribution of needle-shaped α phase in the ND plane. With increasing heat treatment temperature, this structure gradually transforms into a layered structure of α + β phases. Zinc in the SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn titanium alloy is primarily distributed in a homogeneous solid solution within the titanium matrix, with only a small portion clustering and inhibiting the phase transformation of the needle-shaped α phase. Therefore, the addition of zinc effectively stabilizes the β phase, and the incorporation of trace amounts of zinc does not impact its industrial applicability.
The vacuum heat treatment at 800 °C for 4 h followed by furnace cooling (800-4-FC) enhances ductility while maintaining strength in SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn. This is attributed to the coexistence of needle-shaped α phase and layered α + β phase in the optimal proportion, resulting in the best combination of tensile mechanical properties and impact energy. Additionally, the heat treatment improves the high-temperature oxidation resistance of the alloy, thereby enabling its industrial applicability even at elevated temperatures.
Particle erosion leads to the formation of new phases on the surface of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn specimens due to high-temperature phase transformation and the reaction with eroded particles. Particle erosion induces surface work hardening, resulting in the formation of a hardened layer and improved impact toughness. The industrial applicability of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn is enhanced by the addition of zinc, which improves its resistance to erosion and corrosion. Furthermore, its application performance is further enhanced via heat treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.-Y.H.; Validation, Y.-J.C. and J.-R.Z.; Investigation, Y.-J.C.; Resources, F.-Y.H.; Data curation, F.-Y.H. and J.-R.Z.; Writing—original draft, Y.-J.C.; Writing—review & editing, F.-Y.H. and J.-R.Z.; Supervision, F.-Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Datais contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Instrument Center of National Cheng Kung University and the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan for their financial support. The authors also thank the Taiwan Circle Metal Powder Co., Ltd. and Taiwan ANJI Technology Co., Ltd. for providing the alloy powder and SLM printer, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, J. A survey of machine learning in additive manufacturing technologies. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2023, 36, 1258–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nazir, A.; Gokcekaya, O.; Billah, K.M.M.; Ertugrul, O.; Jiang, J.; Sun, J.; Hussain, S. Multi-material additive manufacturing: A systematic review of design, properties, applications, challenges, and 3D Printing of materials and cellular metamaterials. Mater. Des. 2023, 226, 111661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peters, M.; Kumpfert, J.; Ward, C.H.; Leyens, C. Titanium alloys for aerospace applications. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2003, 5, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Niu, X.; Zhu, S.P.; He, J.C.; Liao, D.; Correia, J.A.; Berto, F.; Wang, Q. Defect tolerant fatigue assessment of AM materials: Size effect and probabilistic prospects. Int. J. Fatigue 2022, 160, 106884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, J.X.; Wang, J.X.; Wang, Y.J.; He, H.T.; Zhang, D.B.; Cao, Y. Microstructure evolution and deformation behavior during stretching of a compositionally inhomogeneous TWIP-TRIP cantor-like alloy by laser powder deposition. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2022, 847, 143319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nandhakumar, R.; Venkatesan, K. A process parameters review on Selective laser melting-based additive manufacturing of Single and Multi-Material: Microstructure, Properties, and machinability aspects. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 105538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yap, C.Y.; Chua, C.K.; Dong, Z.L.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, D.Q.; Loh, L.E.; Sing, S.L. Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2015, 2, 041101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, J.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Feng, H.; Zeng, X.; Duan, H.; Cao, Y.; He, J. Formation process and mechanical properties in selective laser melted multi-principal-element alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 133, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, S.; Shin, Y.C. Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy: A review. Mater. Des. 2019, 164, 107552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Luo, K.; Lu, H.; Lu, J. Strengthening mechanism in thermomechanical fatigue properties of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy by laser shock peening. Int. J. Fatigue 2023, 172, 107631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zochowski, P.; Bajkowski, M.; Grygoruk, R.; Magier, M.; Burian, W.; Pyka, D.; Jamroziak, M.B.K. Ballistic impact resistance of bulletproof vest inserts containing printed titanium structures. Metals 2021, 11, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yao, H.L.; Hu, X.Z.; Yi, Z.H.; Xia, J.; Tu, X.Y.; Li, S.B.; Yu, B.; Zhang, M.X.; Bai, X.B.; Chen, Q.Y.; et al. Microstructure and improved anti-corrosion properties of cold-sprayed Zn coatings fabricated by post shot-peening process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 422, 127557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maniam, K.K.; Paul, S. Corrosion performance of electrodeposited zinc and zinc-alloy coatings in marine environment. Corros. Mater. Degrad. 2021, 2, 163–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pola, A.; Tocci, M.; Goodwin, F.E. Review of microstructures and properties of zinc alloys. Metals 2020, 10, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arun, S.; Lim, B.-S.; Ahn, S.-G.; Choe, H.-C. Osteoconductive element-doped, porous, and low-elastic-modulus duplex coatings on a Ti-6Al-4V alloy: A hybrid coating system for accelerating cell growth. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 943, 169131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shuai, C.; Chen, L.; Huang, Z.; Hou, H. Deformation-induced dynamic precipitation of 14H-LPSO structure and its effect on dynamic recrystallization in hot-extruded Mg-Y-Zn alloys. Int. J. Plast. 2023, 164, 103573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Jayalakshmi, S.; Singh, R.A.; Deev, V.B.; Prusov, E.S. Factors determining solid solution phase formation and stability in CoCrFeNiX0.4 (X = Al, Nb, Ta) high entropy alloys fabricated by powder plasma arc additive manufacturing. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 857, 157625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, C.; Wu, Q.; Hua, Y.; Li, J. The electrodeposition of Zn-Ti alloys from ZnCl2-urea deep eutectic solvent. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2014, 18, 2149–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saidi, R.; Ashrafizadeh, F.; Raeissi, K.; Kharaziha, M. Electrochemical aspects of zinc oxide electrodeposition on Ti6Al4V alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 402, 126297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, N.X.; Wang, Y.S.; Zheng, K.; Zhi, J.Q.; Zhou, B.; Wu, Y.X.; Xue, X.P.; Ma, Y.; Cheng, F.; Gao, J.; et al. Achieving CVD diamond films on Mo0. 5 (TiZrTaW) 0.5 highly concentrated alloy for ultrastrong corrosion resistance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2023, 466, 129620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gogia, A. High-temperature titanium alloys. Def. Sci. J. 2005, 55, 149–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Finnie, I. Some observations on the erosion of ductile metals. Wear 1973, 23, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dai, W.S.; Chen, L.H.; Lui, T.S. A study on SiO2 particle erosion of flake graphite and spheroidal graphite cast irons. Wear 2000, 239, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cai, F.; Huang, X.; Yang, Q. Mechanical properties, sliding wear and solid particle erosion behaviors of plasma enhanced magnetron sputtering CrSiCN coating systems. Wear 2015, 324–325, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khoddami, A.; Salimi-Majd, D.; Mohammadi, B. Finite element and experimental investigation of multiple solid particle erosion on Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy coated by multilayer wear-resistant coating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 372, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saidi, R.; Raeissi, K.; Ashrafizadeh, F.; Kharaziha, M. The effect of zinc oxide coating morphology on corrosion performance of Ti-6Al-4V alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 883, 160771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lv, Z.; Li, H.; Che, L.; Chen, S.; Zhang, P.; He, J.; Wu, Z.; Niu, S.; Li, X. Effects of HIP Process Parameters on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Fabricated by SLM. Metals 2023, 13, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Okamoto, H. Ti-Zn (titanium-zinc). J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. 2008, 29, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Y.; Sun, S.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, X.; Li, S.S. Effects of post-weld heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of laser-welded NiTi/304SS joint with Ni filler. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 771, 138545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, J.R.; Hung, F.Y.; Lui, T.S. Particle erosion induced phase transformation of different matrix microstructures of powder bed fusion Ti-6Al-4V alloy flakes. Metals 2019, 9, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Elshaer, R.N.; Ibrahim, K.M. Study of microstructure; mechanical properties, and corrosion behavior of as-cast Ni-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V alloys. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2023, 32, 7831–7845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, J.R.; Hung, F.Y.; Lui, T.S.; Wu, Y.L. The relationship of fracture mechanism between high temperature tensile mechanical properties and particle erosion resistance of selective laser melting Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Metals 2019, 9, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, B.C.; Chang, K.C.; Hung, F.Y.; Microstructure, S.O. Mechanical Properties and Erosion Characteristics of Al-Si Alloy Manufactured by Continuous Casting Direct Rolling Process. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, H.; Zhao, D.; Wang, Q.; Qiang, Y.; Qi, J. Effects of impact energy on the wear resistance and work hardening mechanism of medium manganese austenitic steel. Friction 2017, 5, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Q.; Duan, B.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Si, C. Effect of ultrasonic shot peening on microstructure evolution and corrosion resistance of selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 1090–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 07341 g001
Figure 1. Morphology of Ti-6Al-4V-Zn powders.
Figure 1. Morphology of Ti-6Al-4V-Zn powders.
Materials 16 07341 g001
Materials 16 07341 g002
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the dimensions for SLM processed tensile specimens and erosion test specimens.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the dimensions for SLM processed tensile specimens and erosion test specimens.
Materials 16 07341 g002
Materials 16 07341 g003
Figure 3. Particle erosion test: (a) morphology of erosion particles (Al2O3), (b) schematic diagram of the equipment, and (c) schematic diagram of double-sided erosion on parallel portion during tensile testing [30].
Figure 3. Particle erosion test: (a) morphology of erosion particles (Al2O3), (b) schematic diagram of the equipment, and (c) schematic diagram of double-sided erosion on parallel portion during tensile testing [30].
Materials 16 07341 g003
Materials 16 07341 g004
Figure 4. Microstructure of AS-printed material: (a) ND surface and (b) SD surface.
Figure 4. Microstructure of AS-printed material: (a) ND surface and (b) SD surface.
Materials 16 07341 g004
Materials 16 07341 g005
Figure 5. Microstructure of 800-FC material: (a) 1 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 4 h, and (d) 8 h.
Figure 5. Microstructure of 800-FC material: (a) 1 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 4 h, and (d) 8 h.
Materials 16 07341 g005
Materials 16 07341 g006
Figure 6. Microstructure of 900-FC material: (a) 1 h, (b) 2 h, and (c) 4 h.
Figure 6. Microstructure of 900-FC material: (a) 1 h, (b) 2 h, and (c) 4 h.
Materials 16 07341 g006
Materials 16 07341 g007
Figure 7. XRD analysis of AS, 800-4-FC, and 900-4-FC material.
Figure 7. XRD analysis of AS, 800-4-FC, and 900-4-FC material.
Materials 16 07341 g007
Materials 16 07341 g008
Figure 8. TEM specimen and elemental distribution of 800-4-FC material.
Figure 8. TEM specimen and elemental distribution of 800-4-FC material.
Materials 16 07341 g008
Materials 16 07341 g009
Figure 9. TEM phase identification analysis and atomic lattice with crystallographic axis analysis of 800-4-FC material.
Figure 9. TEM phase identification analysis and atomic lattice with crystallographic axis analysis of 800-4-FC material.
Materials 16 07341 g009
Materials 16 07341 g010
Figure 10. Mechanical properties of AS, 800-FC, and 900-FC material: (a) hardness, (b) tensile curve, (c) yield strength (YS) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and (d) uniform elongation (UE) and total elongation (TE).
Figure 10. Mechanical properties of AS, 800-FC, and 900-FC material: (a) hardness, (b) tensile curve, (c) yield strength (YS) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and (d) uniform elongation (UE) and total elongation (TE).
Materials 16 07341 g010
Materials 16 07341 g011
Figure 11. The mechanism of zinc addition on the tensile properties of AS, 800-FC, and 900-FC material.
Figure 11. The mechanism of zinc addition on the tensile properties of AS, 800-FC, and 900-FC material.
Materials 16 07341 g011
Materials 16 07341 g012
Figure 12. Room temperature tensile fracture surface morphology: (a) AS, (b) 800-1-FC, (c) 800-2-FC, (d) 800-4-FC, and (e) 800-8-FC.
Figure 12. Room temperature tensile fracture surface morphology: (a) AS, (b) 800-1-FC, (c) 800-2-FC, (d) 800-4-FC, and (e) 800-8-FC.
Materials 16 07341 g012
Materials 16 07341 g013
Figure 13. Impact energy and impact fracture sub-surface of AS and 800-4-FC material.
Figure 13. Impact energy and impact fracture sub-surface of AS and 800-4-FC material.
Materials 16 07341 g013
Materials 16 07341 g014
Figure 14. Impact fracture surfaces: (a) AS flat region, (b) AS cracked region, (c) 800-4-FC flat region, and (d) 800-4-FC cracked region.
Figure 14. Impact fracture surfaces: (a) AS flat region, (b) AS cracked region, (c) 800-4-FC flat region, and (d) 800-4-FC cracked region.
Materials 16 07341 g014
Materials 16 07341 g015
Figure 15. High-temperature tensile properties of AS material: (a) tensile curve, (b) yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, and (c) uniform elongation and total elongation.
Figure 15. High-temperature tensile properties of AS material: (a) tensile curve, (b) yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, and (c) uniform elongation and total elongation.
Materials 16 07341 g015
Materials 16 07341 g016
Figure 16. High-temperature tensile fracture surface morphology of AS material: (a) 250 °C, (b) 300 °C, (c) 350 °C, and (d) 400 °C.
Figure 16. High-temperature tensile fracture surface morphology of AS material: (a) 250 °C, (b) 300 °C, (c) 350 °C, and (d) 400 °C.
Materials 16 07341 g016
Materials 16 07341 g017
Figure 17. Erosion rates of AS and 800−4−FC material.
Figure 17. Erosion rates of AS and 800−4−FC material.
Materials 16 07341 g017
Materials 16 07341 g018
Figure 18. XRD analysis of AS and 800-4-FC material before and after particle erosion.
Figure 18. XRD analysis of AS and 800-4-FC material before and after particle erosion.
Materials 16 07341 g018
Materials 16 07341 g019
Figure 19. Surface and sub-surface morphology after 30° erosion: (a) AS surface, (b) 800-4-FC surface, (c) AS sub-surface, and (d) 800-4-FC sub-surface.
Figure 19. Surface and sub-surface morphology after 30° erosion: (a) AS surface, (b) 800-4-FC surface, (c) AS sub-surface, and (d) 800-4-FC sub-surface.
Materials 16 07341 g019
Materials 16 07341 g020
Figure 20. Surface and sub-surface morphology after 90° erosion: (a) AS surface, (b) 800-4-FC surface, (c) AS sub-surface, and (d) 800-4-FC sub-surface.
Figure 20. Surface and sub-surface morphology after 90° erosion: (a) AS surface, (b) 800-4-FC surface, (c) AS sub-surface, and (d) 800-4-FC sub-surface.
Materials 16 07341 g020
Materials 16 07341 g021
Figure 21. Tensile properties before and after particle erosion in AS and 800-4-FC material: (a) tensile curve, (b) yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, and (c) uniform elongation and total elongation.
Figure 21. Tensile properties before and after particle erosion in AS and 800-4-FC material: (a) tensile curve, (b) yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, and (c) uniform elongation and total elongation.
Materials 16 07341 g021
Materials 16 07341 g022
Figure 22. Tensile fracture surfaces after particle erosion: (a) AS and (b) 800-4-FC.
Figure 22. Tensile fracture surfaces after particle erosion: (a) AS and (b) 800-4-FC.
Materials 16 07341 g022
Materials 16 07341 g023
Figure 23. Impact energy and impact fracture sub-surfaces before and after particle erosion of AS and 800-4-FC material.
Figure 23. Impact energy and impact fracture sub-surfaces before and after particle erosion of AS and 800-4-FC material.
Materials 16 07341 g023
Materials 16 07341 g024
Figure 24. Polarization curves of SLM Ti−6Al−4V AS material and SLM Ti−6Al−4V−Zn AS material.
Figure 24. Polarization curves of SLM Ti−6Al−4V AS material and SLM Ti−6Al−4V−Zn AS material.
Materials 16 07341 g024
Table 1. Parameters of the process for SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy.
Table 1. Parameters of the process for SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy.
Particle
Size		Laser
Power		Laser
Radius		Scanning
Velocity		Layer
Thickness
15–53 μm170 W35 μm1000 mm/s60 μm
Table 2. Chemical composition of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy (wt.%).
Table 2. Chemical composition of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn alloy (wt.%).
ElementAlVZnOCNTi
Wt.%5.73.70.30.20.10.1Bal.
Table 3. TEM elemental analysis of the 800-4-FC specimen.
Table 3. TEM elemental analysis of the 800-4-FC specimen.
ElementTiAlVZn
at.%175.273.5821.090.07
287.269.423.320.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, Y.-J.; Hung, F.-Y.; Zhao, J.-R. Microstructural Characteristics and Material Failure Mechanism of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn Alloy. Materials 2023, 16, 7341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237341

AMA Style

Cheng Y-J, Hung F-Y, Zhao J-R. Microstructural Characteristics and Material Failure Mechanism of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn Alloy. Materials. 2023; 16(23):7341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Yi-Jin, Fei-Yi Hung, and Jun-Ren Zhao. 2023. "Microstructural Characteristics and Material Failure Mechanism of SLM Ti-6Al-4V-Zn Alloy" Materials 16, no. 23: 7341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop