Next Article in Journal
Patterning of Polymer-Functionalized Nanoparticles with Varied Surface Mobilities of Polymers
Previous Article in Journal
Improving the Thermal Stability of the Fine-Grained Structure in the Cu-15Ni-8Sn Alloy during Solution Treatment by the Additions of Si and Ti
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hybrid Nano Flake-like Vanadium Diselenide Combined on Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube as a Binder-Free Electrode for Sodium-Ion Batteries

1
Department of Chemistry and Research Institute of Natural Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
2
Energy & Environment Laboratory, KEPCO Research Institute, Daejeon 34056, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2023, 16(3), 1253; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031253
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 12 January 2023 / Accepted: 29 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023

Abstract

:
As the market for electric vehicles and portable electronic devices continues to grow rapidly, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have emerged as energy storage systems to replace lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, sodium-ion is heavier and larger than lithium-ion, resulting in volume expansion and slower ion transfer. It is necessary to find suitable anode materials with high capacity and stability. In addition, wearable electronics are starting to be commercialized, requiring a binder-free electrode used in flexible batteries. In this work, we synthesized nano flake-like VSe2 using organic precursor and combined it with MWCNT as carbonaceous material. VSe2@MWCNT was mixed homogenously using sonication and fabricated film electrodes without a binder and substrate via vacuum filter. The hybrid electrode exhibited high-rate capability and stable cycling performance with a discharge capacity of 469.1 mAhg−1 after 200 cycles. Furthermore, VSe2@MWCNT exhibited coulombic efficiency of ~99.7%, indicating good cycle stability. Additionally, VSe2@MWCNT showed a predominant 85.5% of capacitive contribution at a scan rate of 1 mVs−1 in sodiation/desodiation process. These results showed that VSe2@MWCNT is a suitable anode material for flexible SIBs.

1. Introduction

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are garnering attraction as a next-generation energy storage device to replace lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) thanks to their resource-abundant and price-effective advantages [1,2]. SIBs have a charging protocol similar to LIBs. Their disadvantage is that sodium ions have a larger radius than lithium ions [3,4]. It is necessary to find an appropriate anode material for SIBs in terms of energy density, specific capacity, and stability. Among various anode material candidates (carbon, metal oxide, metal sulfide, organic materials, etc.) [5,6,7,8], metal selenides have a high capacity and a lot of active sites. However, metal selenides have problems due to their low cycle stability and electrical conductivity [9,10]. These problems are mitigated through compounding with carbonaceous materials such as reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and carbon nanotube (CNT) [11,12,13]. Usually, when preparing an anode electrode using the slurry-casting method, the slurry is coated on the copper foil using a binder such as a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), or styrene butadiene rubber (SBR). However, since binders are generally electrochemically inactive and insulating materials, an experimental process using binders may reduce electrical conductivity and cause a side reaction with the electrolyte [14]. Moreover, most binders are unstable at high temperatures exceeding 200 °C and reduce the overall energy density of batteries by increasing the weight and volume of electrodes [15,16,17,18]. With technological advances, the demand for flexible and wearable batteries has surged, especially in relation to binder-free electrodes [19]. In this paper, we made CNTs (carbon nanotubes) composite binder-free film electrodes to improve conductivity through a vacuum filter. CNTs are widely investigated in various fields for their chemical stability, electrical conductivity, and large surface area, and are used as energy storage, electronics, etc. [20,21]. Research papers on improved characteristics of CNTs have been analyzed as functionalized covalent or non-covalent [22]. Recently, the covalent functionalized CNTs composite with metal chalcogenide is starting to be applied in anode for alkali ion batteries. For example, T. Hou et al. reported ZnS/CNT composite through MWCNT processed acid treatment. The ZnS/CNT electrodes exhibit long-term cycle stability and a capacity of 333 mAhg1 at 2 Ag1 over 4000 cycles for LIBs and 314 mAhg1 at 5 Ag1 after 500 cycles for SIBs [23]. However, the disorganized conjugation system of CNT and covalent functionalized CNTs are not suitable for application for high conductivity [24]. On the contrary, non-covalent (π-π interaction, Van der Waals force, electrostatic, etc.) functionalized CNTs have delocalized the π- electron through π-stacking or/and Van der Waals force and have a high level of electron conductivity [24]. Thus, the binder-free electrode can be made by combining metal selenides and CNT, which is a carbon material with excellent flexibility and conductivity, through vacuum filtering. For example, M. Chen et al. fabricated a binder-free anode using a 2D ultrathin SnO nanoflakes array grown directly on GF/CNTs substrate [25]. Y. Wang et al. synthesized binder-free WS2/CNT-rGO aerogel hybrid nanoarchitecture electrodes and showed outstanding electrochemical performance for both LIBs and SIBs [26]. Layered metal chalcogenides such as MoSe2, WS2, and TiS2 have been applied in energy storage due to their thick atomic layers and 2D morphology [27,28,29]. Y. Tang et al. have synthesized carbon-stabilized interlayer-expanded few-layer MoSe2@C nanosheets and found that they could exhibit a reversible capability of 421 mAhg1 at 0.2 Ag1 [30]. Y. Liu et al. showed that WS2/NC nanosheets exhibited a reversible specific capacity of 180.1 mAhg1 at a current density of 1.0 Ag1 after 400 cycles [31]. Vanadium diselenide, which has a typical layered structure metal chalcogenide, has large interlayer spacing (6.11 Å) and has weak Van der Waals force between the layers. Consequently, vanadium diselenide is expected to have great potential as an alternative anode material for sodium ion batteries, in addition to its applications in anodes or cathodes for metal ion batteries [32]. Because of the strong electron coupling between V4+-V4+ pairs, vanadium diselenide induces metallic properties and can accommodate sodium ion in vanadium diselenide, which shows changes in the valence state from V+5 to V+2 [33]. Moreover, vanadium diselenide has a crystal structure similar to that of graphite. VSe2 shows conversion reactions during charge/discharge processes [34]. These characteristics facilitate the diffusion of large-sized alkali ions. Theoretically, 1 mol of VSe2 can hold 4 mol of sodium ions and electrons, which exhibits a high theoretical specific capacity [35]. In this study, nano flake-like vanadium selenides (VSe2) were synthesized by a simple colloidal method and hybridized with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) to be used as an anode electrode without binder, conductive carbon, and substrate. VSe2@MWCNT nanohybrids showed high-rate performance and long-cycle stability with a discharge capacity of 469.1 mAhg1 at a current density of 0.01 Ag1 after 200 cycles. Therefore, instead of combined MWCNT, which shows poor cycle stability, this paper suggests alternative anode materials for flexible SIBs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of 1,3-Dimethyl-imidazoline-2-selenone

Synthesis of 1,3-dimethyl-imidazoline-2-selenone was performed with slight modification on the previous report [36,37]. Briefly, Iodomethane (CH3I, 2 mL, 16 mmol, 1.3eq. (to 1-Methylimidazole) JUNSEI, Tokyo, Japan) was added to a 200 mL two-neck Schlenk flask. After that, 1-Methylimidazole (C4H6N2, 2 mL, 12 mmol, Alfa Aesar, Seoul, Republic of Korea) was poured with Methanol (MeOH, 30 mL, SAMCHUN, Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea) into a Schlenk flask and stirred at 800 rpm at room temperature overnight. The supernatant was removed and we collected a white colored product (1,3-dimethylimidazolium iodide, 2.91 g) was collected. Selenium (Se, 3.15 g, 40 mmol (3eq. to 1,3-dimethylimidazolium iodide), Acros organics, Fairlawn, NJ, USA) was then added, followed by addition of potassium carbonate anhydrous (K2CO3, 9.36 g, 67 mmol, SAMCHUN, Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea). The reaction was stirred over one day at room temperature. Then, the product was filtrated with Celite and the extra solvent was evaporated. The crude product was extracted using dichloromethane (DCM, SAMCHUN, Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea) and distilled water (DI water).

2.2. Synthesis of Nano Flake-like VSe2 and VSe2@MWCNT

Nano flakes-like VSe2 was synthesized via a wet chemical method with a surfactant for shape control. A 50 mL two-neck Schlenk flask was poured with oleylamine (OAm, 12 mL, technical grade 70%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and dried under vacuum conditions at 150 °C for over one hour. After heating oleylamine, vanadium chloride (VCl3, 0.1 g, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added, followed by the addition of 1,3-dimethyl-imidazoline-2-selenone dissolved in dichloromethane (DCM, 3 mL, SAMCHUM, Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea) solution under argon condition. The reaction was heated to 200 °C for 3 h. A black-colored product was cooled at room temperature and washed with methanol and hexane. The obtained product was then dried in vacuum conditions.

2.3. Material Characterization

Morphologies of the VSe2@MWCNT and MWCNT were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-7601F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI RF30ST, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) equipped with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Ultim Max, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon on Thames, UK). X-ray diffraction (XRD) were conducted using a D8 Advance A25 (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) at 40 kV and 40 mA to characterize compositions of compounds. Raman spectra were recorded on Renishaw InVia (Renishaw, Wotton-under-Edge, UK) with a wavelength of 514.5 nm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out using the Thermo VG scientific Sigma Probe spectrometer (Sigma probe, Thermo VG scientific, East Grinstead, UK) with a monochromatic photon energy of 1486.6 eV (Al Kα). The specific surface area was determined from N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms measured using the BELSORP-mini Ⅱ (MicrotracBEL, Osaka, Japan).

2.4. Electrochemical Properties Evaluation

VSe2@MWCNT and MWCNT electrodes were made without a binder and substrate. The VSe2 and MWCNT (VSe2/MWCNT 1:1) were added in N,N-dimethylformamide and dispersed via sonication. The well-dispersed mixture was filtered through an Anodisc membrane (47 nm in diameter, 0.2 mm pores, Whatman, Maidstone, UK) and placed in a convection oven to dry. After that, VSe2@MWCNT film was separated from the filter and used directly as anode for sodium-ion batteries. Half-coin cells were assembled in a glove box to prevent sodium metal contamination. Half-cion cell (CR2032) was prepared using VSe2@MWCNT with the MWCNT electrode as the working electrode, sodium metal as a counter electrode, and glass fiber separator in 1 M NaPF6 in a diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (DEGDME) as an electrolyte. Galvanostatic tests with a constant charge/discharge current were conducted WBCS3000S (Wonatech, Seoul, Republic of Korea) in a voltage range of 0.01 to 2.7 V versus Na/Na+ at room temperature. Additionally, Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) measurements were evaluated on a potentiostat (ZIVE SP1, Wonatech, Seoul, Republic of Korea). CV curves were recorded in the voltage range (0.01–2.7 V) at various scan rate. EIS were conducted in the frequency range from 1 MHz to 1 Hz.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Composition Analysis

A two-dimensional flake-like VSe2 was synthesized through a wet chemical method with various conditions controlled (detailed descriptions can be found in Materials and Methods Sections). Morphologies of VSe2@MWCNT and MWCNT were determined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM). The VSe2 was well stacked with 1 μm-sized flake-liked nanomaterials, as shown in Figure 1a,b. The crystal lattice spacing of 0.26 nm corresponding to (011) planes showed high crystallinity of VSe2 (Figure 1c). The pristine MWCNT in the form of densely distributed nanotubes was entangled with a diameter of about 20 nm (Figure 1d). VSe2 was homogenously dispersed throughout the MWCNT. Its shape did not change even after a hybridization process (Figure 1e,f). The MWCNT, which combined well with VSe2, could improve electrical conductivity and alleviate volume expansion. The electrode was fabricated without a binder and substrate.
The energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) mapping images in Figure 2 show that V and Se were evenly distributed in VSe2. Figure 2b,c show the distribution of atomic V and Se and demonstrate the homogeneity of VSe2. The stoichiometric V and Se atomic percentages were 31.17% and 68.83%, respectively.

3.2. Electrochemical Properties and Sodium-Ion Storage

The crystallinity of VSe2@MWCNT and MWCNT was analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectrum, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Diffraction peaks of VSe2@MWCNT were well matched with a combination of JCPDS No.74–1411 and MWCNT (Figure 2a) [38,39,40]. These results showed that they were physically mixed and maintained their compositions even after a composite process. Surface properties of VSe2@MWCNT were studied with XPS to confirm binding energy and composition (Figure 3b). Figure 3b displays the XPS V 2p spectrum of VSe2@MWCNT. Peaks located at 516.7 eV and 523.9 eV were attributable to V 2p3/2 and V 2p1/2, respectively [41,42]. As shown in Figure 3c, the Se 3d XPS spectrum exhibited 53.5, 54.3, 55.2 and 55.9 eV (Se 3d5/2 and 3d3/2). Based on a previous report, trace element Se (0) is highly likely to exist in the final product [43,44,45]. In the XPS C 1s spectrum, peaks at 284.4, 284.9, 285.9 and 289.4 eV corresponded to C-C, C-OH, C=O and C=O-OH, respectively (Figure 3d) [46]. The nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements were conducted to estimate the surface property of VSe2 and VSe2@MWCNT (Figure S2). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) theory showed a type IV isotherm. VSe2@MWCNT exhibited the higher specific surface area of 28.0 m2g−1 compared to VSe2 (16.7 m2g−1), due to the introduction of MWCNT. The carbon structures of MWCNT and VSe2@MWCNT were investigated using Raman spectroscopy. Two representative carbon bands, the E2g vibration mode of graphite layers with sp2 carbon (G band at ~1580 cm−1) and A1g breathing mode of the sp2 bonded carbon near the basal edge corresponding to the structural defects (D band at ~1350 cm−1), as well as a 2D band representing the stacked carbon layers, are observed in both MWCNT and VSe2@MWCNT spectra [47,48]. The parallel average size of the crystalline sp2 carbon clusters (La) was calculated from the ratio of the integral Raman intensities of D and G bands. ID/IG used the following Equation (1) [49]:
I D I G = C λ L a
where C (λ) is a constant dependent on the laser wavelength (here, 4.4 for a 514 nm laser). Interestingly, VSe2@MWCNT revealed narrower and sharper G and D bands with fewer overlapping disordered carbon peaks at around 1350 and 1580 cm−1 related to residual sp3 carbons and amorphous sp2 carbons, respectively. This showed a more developed carbon sp2-hybridized carbon structure compared with that of MWCNT [50]. ID/IG ratio of MWCNTs and VSe2@MWCNT were estimated as 1.26 and 0.96, corresponding to 3.50 and 4.57 nm of La, respectively.
Electrochemical properties of VSe2@MWCNT and MWCNT were evaluated using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge tests with 1 M NaPF6 solution with a diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (DEGDME) as an electrolyte. The CV and charge/discharge curve (CD curve) explained the redox reaction of VSe2@MWCNT in the potential range of 0.01 to 2.7 V versus Na/Na+ (Figure 4a,b). In the first cycle of CV, a reduction peak at 2.03 V was observed, which was related to a sodiation process. In the cathodic sweep process, conversion reaction and formation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) occurred at 1.3 V (with a start at about 1.8 V) and 0.3 V peaks [51]. The anodic peaks appeared as a broad 2.41 V peak in the first anodic sweep corresponding to desodiation [52]. These redox peaks were well matched with the plateau at the CD curve. The CV curves changed at each cycle; this was influenced by the formation of SEI layer after the first cycle. As shown in Figure 4c, Nyquist plots of MWCNT and VSe2@MWCNT consisted of the depressed semicircle in the high–medium frequency region, as well as the inclined line at low frequency. The EIS data were analyzed and fitted by the proposed equivalent circuit diagram (Figure S1a) [53]. The Rsf and Rct each showed the SEI layer impedance and charge transfer impedance relevant to the interfacial sodium-ion transfer. The W represented the Warburg impedance related to sodium-ion diffusion at a low frequency. The lower Rct value of VSe2@MWCNT (137.6 Ω) than MWCNT (379 Ω) indicated that VSe2@MWCNT had outstanding electrical conductivity. To accurately compare the sodium-ion diffusion kinetics of VSe2@MWCNT and MWCNT, the sodium diffusion coefficient (DNa) was calculated using the following Equation (2) [54]:
D N a = R 2 T 2 2 A 2 n 2 F 4 C 2 σ 2
where R is the gas constant; T is the absolute temperature; A is the surface area of the electrode; F is the Faraday constant; and C is the concentration of sodium-ion in the electrode. The Warburg factor (σ) is calculated by the slope of the real part resistance and the inverse square root of the angular speed plot in the low-frequency range (Figure S1b). The DNa value of VSe2@MWCNT and MWCNT was 6.77 × 10−19 cm2 s−1 and 4.16 × 10−20 cm2 s−1, respectively. These results showed that sodium-ion diffusion of VSe2@MWCNT was faster than MWCNT. Figure 4d shows the rate capability results of VSe2@MWCNT and MWCNT at different current densities ranging from 0.05 to 2 Ag−1 (Figure 4d). The VSe2@MWCNT exhibited discharge capacities of 319.6, 274.3, 239.2, 204.6, 186.9, 164.8 and 140.8 mAhg−1 at 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 1 and 2 Ag−1, respectively. A discharge capacity of 252.3 mAhg−1 was recovered when the current density was lowered from 2 Ag−1 to 0.05 Ag−1. The MWCNT exhibited a discharge capacity of 128.3, 123.5, 119.2, 112.5, 107.6, 104.3 and 94.9 mAhg−1 at 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 1 and 2 Ag−1 and recovered the discharge capacity of 127.4 mAhg−1 well when the current density returned to 0.05 Ag−1. The cycle performance of VSe2@MWCNT was conducted at a current density of 0.01 Ag−1 (Figure 4e). VSe2@MWCNT delivered a discharge capacity of 469.1 mAhg−1 after 200 cycles and the Coulombic efficiency reached 99.7%. Coulombic efficiency, that was initially 22.4%, increased to around 99% with cycle progression. To compare the properties of binder-free electrodes for SIBs, the synthesis method and electrochemical performance were summarized in Table 1. Among the free-template metal chalcogenides electrode, VSe2@MWCNT showed good sodium-ions storage capacity and Coulombic efficiency. These results showed several advantages of our materials, as follows: (1) MWCNT can enhance intercalation/deintercalation of sodium-ions and alleviate volume expansion during the charge/discharge processes [55]; (2) VSe2 has adsorption sites to interact with sodium-ions [32]; (3) non-covalent functionalization of VSe2@MWWCNT hybrid affects to electrical conductivity [24].
To study sodium-ion storage and quantitative kinetics of VSe2@MWCNT, CV tests were conducted at various scan rates at 0.2 to 2 mVs−1 (Figure 5a). With an increasing scan rate, the value of peak current increased proportionally, whereas the shape of the CV did not change. The peak current (mA) and scan rate (mVs−1) had a correlation, as shown in Equations (3) and (4). In Equation (4), the value of b (0.5 < b < 1) could be calculated based on the slope of the log (peak current)-log (scan rate) plot [58].
i   V = a ν b
log i   V = b log ν + log a
The value of b close to 0.5 was a diffusion-controlled reaction (Faradaic process). A value close to 1 indicated a capacitive-controlled reaction (non-Faradaic process) [59]. The b value was 0.61 at an oxidation peak of 2.4 V and 0.63 at a reduction peak of 1.3 V (Figure 5b). Electrochemical kinetics at a fixed scan rate could be explained by Equations (5) and (6). The ratio of the capacitive-controlled reaction was given with the value of k1ν, while the diffusion-controlled reaction was given with k2ν1/2 [60].
i   V = k 1 ν + k 2 ν 1 / 2
i   V ν 1 / 2 = k 1 ν 1 / 2 + k 2
The obtained proportion of capacitive contribution (brown region) was 85.5% at a scan rate of 1 mVs−1 for VSe2@MWCNT (Figure 5c). Figure 5d shows the trend of capacitive behavior when the scan rate was increased (proportions of 42.3, 68.9, 85.5 and 98.1% at a scan rate of 0.2, 0.5, 1 and 2 mVs−1, respectively). These results indicate that a capacitive behavior-controlled process is better than a diffusion-controlled process. As previously reported, high capacitive contribution enables better cycle performance and plays a pivotal role in good stability and a long lifespan [61,62,63]. Therefore, the two-dimensional flake-like VSe2 and the high electrical conductivity of MWCNT can improve the diffusion kinetics of sodium ions.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a flake-like VSe2 was synthesized with a colloidal method. It was hybridized with MWCNT through vacuum filtration. Such flake-like nanomaterials increased the surface area and made it easier to encounter electrolytes, thus facilitating sodium-ions kinetics. By using MWCNT with excellent flexibility and electrical conductivity, VSe2 problems could be solved. Electrodes were prepared without a binder and substrate by hybridization of MWCNT with VSe2. Therefore, using Raman spectroscopy, non-covalent functionalized CNT and VSe2 composite showed increased sp2 carbon structure crystallinity. The hybrid anode exhibited a high level of coulombic efficiency of 99.7 % and a discharge capacity of 469.1 mAhg−1, even after 200 cycles. The VSe2@MWCNT electrode measured various current densities and showed specific capacities of 319.6, 274.3, 239.2, 204.6, 186.9, 164.8 and 140.8 mAhg−1 at 0.05, 0.1 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 1.0 and 2.0 Ag−1. We believe that such binder-free VSe2@MWCNT composite films can be easily prepared through the strategy described in this work and be successfully applied as new anode materials in SIBs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma16031253/s1, Figure S1: (a) equivalent circuit diagram and (b) relationship of imaginary resistance (Z’) and inverse square root of angular speed (ω−0.5); Figure S2: N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of VSe2 and VSe2@MWCNT.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H.M. and J.C.; methodology, Y.J. and M.E.L.; software, Y.J. and G.K.; validation, G.K., H.S. and W.N.; formal analysis, Y.J., G.K. and J.H.M.; investigation, H.S. and W.N.; resources, Y.J., M.E.L. and S.K.K.; data curation, Y.J., G.K., H.S. and J.H.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.J. and G.K.; writing—review and editing, Y.J., M.E.L., S.K.K., J.H.M. and J.C.; visualization, Y.J. and J.H.M.; supervision, J.H.M. and J.C.; project administration, J.H.M. and J.C.; funding acquisition, J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1F1A1072441, NRF-2021R1C1C1011436). This research was supported by “Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS)” through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2021RIS-003) and following are results of a study on the “Leaders in INdustry-university Cooperation 3.0” Project, supported by the Ministry of Education and National Research Foundation of Korea. This work was supported by the Technological Development for Commercialization by using techbridge platform [RS-2022-00141871] funded by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hwang, J.Y.; Myung, S.T.; Sun, Y.K. Sodium-Ion Batteries: Present and Future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3529–3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Deng, J.; Luo, W.B.; Chou, S.L.; Liu, H.K.; Dou, S.X. Sodium-Ion Batteries: From Academic Research to Practical Commercialization. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, H.; Kim, H.; Ding, Z.; Lee, M.H.; Lim, K.; Yoon, G.; Kang, K. Recent Progress in Electrode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, S.; Xia, L.; Yu, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Lou, X.W. Free-Standing Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanofiber Films: Integrated Electrodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Ultralong Cycle Life and Superior Rate Capability. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Ma, L.; Li, H.; Xu, X.; Liu, X.; Lu, T.; Pan, L. Insights into the Storage Mechanism of 3D Nanoflower-like V3S4 Anode in Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 130936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Z.; Feng, X.; Bai, Y.; Yang, H.; Dong, R.; Wang, X.; Xu, H.; Wang, Q.; Li, H.; Gao, H.; et al. Probing the Energy Storage Mechanism of Quasi-Metallic Na in Hard Carbon for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, W.; Allen, M.; Raju, V.; Ji, X. An Organic Pigment as a High-Performance Cathode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1400554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meng, J.K.; Wang, W.W.; Wang, Q.C.; Cao, M.H.; Fu, Z.W.; Wu, X.J.; Zhou, Y.N. Graphene Supported Ultrafine Tin Oxide Nanoparticles Enable Conversion Reaction Dominated Mechanism for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 303, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Q.; Zhang, W.; Peng, J.; Yu, D.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wu, J.; Wang, G.; Li, H.; Huang, S. Nanodot-in-Nanofiber Structured Carbon-Confined Sb2Se3 Crystallites for Fast and Durable Sodium Storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2112776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ge, P.; Hou, H.; Li, S.; Yang, L.; Ji, X. Tailoring Rod-Like FeSe2 Coated with Nitrogen-Doped Carbon for High-Performance Sodium Storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1801765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wei, X.; Li, W.; Shi, J.A.; Gu, L.; Yu, Y. FeS@C on Carbon Cloth as Flexible Electrode for Both Lithium and Sodium Storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 27804–27809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, X.; Ma, T.; Fang, T.; Gao, Y.; Gao, S.; Wang, W.; Liao, L. A Novel MoS2@C Framework Architecture Composites with Three-Dimensional Cross-Linked Porous Carbon Supporting MoS2 Nanosheets for Sodium Storage. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 818, 152821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, Y.; Zhong, W.; Tang, W.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.; Li, Q.; Xu, M.; Bao, S. juan Flexible Electrode Constructed by Encapsulating Ultrafine VSe2 in Carbon Fiber for Quasi-Solid-State Sodium Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 470, 228438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jin, T.; Han, Q.; Jiao, L. Binder-Free Electrodes for Advanced Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1806304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ellis, B.L.; Knauth, P.; Djenizian, T. Three-Dimensional Self-Supported Metal Oxides for Advanced Energy Storage. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3368–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Landi, B.J.; Ganter, M.J.; Cress, C.D.; DiLeo, R.A.; Raffaelle, R.P. Carbon Nanotubes for Lithium Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 638–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ren, Q.; Wang, H.; Lu, X.F.; Tong, Y.X.; Li, G.R. Recent Progress on MOF-Derived Heteroatom-Doped Carbon-Based Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, Y.; Zhou, M.; Lei, Y. Nanoarchitectured Array Electrodes for Rechargeable Lithium- and Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, J.; Myung, Y.; Kim, S.K. Flexible Sodium-Ion Battery Anodes Using Indium Sulfide-Based Nanohybrid Paper Electrodes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 467–468, 1040–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oliveira, T.M.B.F.; Morais, S. New Generation of Electrochemical Sensors Based on Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Abd El-Mageed, A.I.A.; Ogawa, T. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Absolute-Handedness Chirality Assignment Confirmation Using Metalized Porphyrin’s Supramolecular Structures via STM Imaging Technique. Chirality 2020, 32, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hirsch, A. Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1853–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hou, T.; Liu, B.; Sun, X.; Fan, A.; Xu, Z.; Cai, S.; Zheng, C.; Yu, G.; Tricoli, A. Covalent Coupling-Stabilized Transition-Metal Sulfide/Carbon Nanotube Composites for Lithium/Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 6735–6746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. El-Shafai, N.; El-Khouly, M.E.; El-Kemary, M.; Ramadan, M.S.; Masoud, M.S. Self-Assembly of Porphyrin on Graphene Oxide in Aqueous Medium: Fabrication, Characterization, and Photocatalytic Studies. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019, 18, 2071–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, M.; Chao, D.; Liu, J.; Yan, J.; Zhang, B.; Huang, Y.; Lin, J.; Shen, Z.X. Rapid Pseudocapacitive Sodium-Ion Response Induced by 2D Ultrathin Tin Monoxide Nanoarrays. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1606232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Y.; Kong, D.; Shi, W.; Liu, B.; Sim, G.J.; Ge, Q.; Yang, H.Y. Ice Templated Free-Standing Hierarchically WS2/CNT-RGO Aerogel for High-Performance Rechargeable Lithium and Sodium Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1601057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fan, H.N.; Zhang, Q.; Gu, Q.F.; Li, Y.; Luo, W.B.; Liu, H.K. Exploration of the Sodium Ion Ordered Transfer Mechanism in a MoSe2@Graphene Composite for Superior Rate and Lifespan Performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 13736–13742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, D.; Dou, S.; Wang, G. WS2@graphene Nanocomposites as Anode Materials for Na-Ion Batteries with Enhanced Electrochemical Performances. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 4192–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tao, H.; Zhou, M.; Wang, R.; Wang, K.; Cheng, S.; Jiang, K. TiS2 as an Advanced Conversion Electrode for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Ultra-High Capacity and Long-Cycle Life. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1801021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Qiu, J. Carbon-Stabilized Interlayer-Expanded Few-Layer MoSe2 Nanosheets for Sodium Ion Batteries with Enhanced Rate Capability and Cycling Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 32324–32332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Majumder, S.; Shao, M.; Deng, Y.; Chen, G. Two Dimensional WS2/C Nanosheets as a Polysulfides Immobilizer for High Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, A5386–A5395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Salavati, M.; Rabczuk, T. Application of Highly Stretchable and Conductive Two-Dimensional 1T VS2 and VSe2 as Anode Materials for Li-, Na- and Ca-Ion Storage. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2019, 160, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, W.; Chen, D.; She, Y.; Zeng, M.; Lin, X.; Ang, E.H.; Yan, C.; Qin, Y.; Rui, X. Rational Design of Vanadium Chalcogenides for Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 478, 228769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, C.; Feng, J.; Lv, F.; Zhou, J.; Lin, C.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, J.; et al. Metallic Graphene-Like VSe2 Ultrathin Nanosheets: Superior Potassium-Ion Storage and Their Working Mechanism. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, J.; Yan, D.; Lu, T.; Yao, Y.; Pan, L. An Advanced CoSe Embedded within Porous Carbon Polyhedra Hybrid for High Performance Lithium-Ion and Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 325, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Choi, J.; Kang, N.; Yang, H.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Son, S.U. Colloidal Synthesis of Cubic-Phase Copper Selenide Nanodiscs and Their Optoelectronic Properties. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 3586–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Choi, J.; Jin, J.; Jung, I.G.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, H.J.; Son, S.U. SnSe2 Nanoplate–Graphene Composites as Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5241–5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kuo, F.Y.; Lin, F.S.; Yeh, M.H.; Fan, M.S.; Hsiao, L.Y.; Lin, J.J.; Jeng, R.J.; Ho, K.C. Synthesis of Surfactant-Free and Morphology-Controllable Vanadium Diselenide for Efficient Counter Electrodes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 11, 25090–25099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nie, P.; Min, C.; Song, H.J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, K. Preparation and Tribological Properties of Polyimide/Carboxyl-Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposite Films under Seawater Lubrication. Tribol. Lett. 2015, 58, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kwak, J.; Jung, S.; Lee, N.; Thiyagarajan, K.; Kim, J.K.; Giri, A.; Jeong, U. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Group 5 Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Thin Films. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 11303–11311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Feng, Y.; Wu, K.; Xu, C.; Wu, S.; Guo, Z.; He, M.; Xu, X.; Xue, M. Cellulose/Lignin-Based Carbon Nanobelt Aerogels Coating on VSe2 Nanosheets as Anode for High Performance Potassium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2022, 548, 232033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yi, Y.; Du, X.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Guan, H.; Liu, X.; Pei, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, D. Coupling of Metallic VSe2 and Conductive Polypyrrole for Boosted Sodium-Ion Storage by Reinforced Conductivity Within and Outside. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 7772–7782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, Z.L.; Wu, X.; Shao, Y.; Qi, J.; Cao, Y.; Huang, L.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.O.; Zheng, Q.; Zhu, Z.L.; et al. Epitaxially Grown Monolayer VSe2: An Air-Stable Magnetic Two-Dimensional Material with Low Work Function at Edges. Sci. Bull. 2018, 63, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, C.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, S.; Li, K.; Li, Y.; Yang, B.; Chen, W.; Wang, L.; Li, D.; Deng, H.; et al. Accelerated Optimization of TiO2/Sb2Se3 Thin Film Solar Cells by High-Throughput Combinatorial Approach. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, J.; Guan, F. Solution-Synthesis of Sb2Se3 Nanorods Using KSeCN as a Molecular Selenium Source. CrystEngComm 2019, 22, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pandit, B.; Sankapal, B.R. Cerium Selenide Nanopebble/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Composite Electrodes for Solid-State Symmetric Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 3007–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ferrari, A.C.; Robertson, J. Resonant Raman Spectroscopy of Disordered, Amorphous, and Diamondlike Carbon. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 075414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dresselhaus, M.S.; Jorio, A.; Hofmann, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Saito, R. Perspectives on Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Raman Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tuinstra, F.; Koenig, J.L. Raman Spectrum of Graphite. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 1126–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Puravankara, S. Nagmani Insights into the Plateau Capacity Dependence on the Rate Performance and Cycling Stability of a Superior Hard Carbon Microsphere Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS. Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 10045–10052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ming, F.; Liang, H.; Lei, Y.; Zhang, W.; Alshareef, H.N. Solution Synthesis of VSe2 Nanosheets and Their Alkali Metal Ion Storage Performance. Nano Energy 2018, 53, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, X.; Zhang, Z. Carbon-Coated Vanadium Selenide as Anode for Lithium-Ion Batteries and Sodium-Ion Batteries with Enhanced Electrochemical Performance. Mater. Lett. 2017, 189, 152–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yan, B.; Li, X.; Fu, X.; Zhang, L.; Bai, Z.; Yang, X. An Elaborate Insight of Lithiation Behavior of V2O5 Anode. Nano Energy 2020, 78, 105233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, Y.S.; Ryu, K.S. Study of the Lithium Diffusion Properties and High Rate Performance of TiNb6O17 as an Anode in Lithium Secondary Battery. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tang, Q.; Jiang, Q.; Wu, T.; Wu, T.; Ding, Z.; Wu, J.; Yu, H.; Huang, K. Binary Iron Sulfide as a Low-Cost and High-Performance Anode for Lithium-/Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 52888–52898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Luo, W.; Calas, A.; Tang, C.; Li, F.; Zhou, L.; Mai, L. Ultralong Sb2Se3 Nanowire-Based Free-Standing Membrane Anode for Lithium/Sodium Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 35219–35226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. David, L.; Bhandavat, R.; Singh, G. MoS2/Graphene Composite Paper for Sodium-Ion Battery Electrodes. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1759–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kim, T.; Choi, W.; Shin, H.C.; Choi, J.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Park, M.S.; Yoon, W.S. Applications of Voltammetry in Lithium Ion Battery Research. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2020, 11, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jiang, Y.; Liu, J. Definitions of Pseudocapacitive Materials: A Brief Review. Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yousaf, M.; Chen, Y.; Tabassum, H.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Abid, A.Y.; Mahmood, A.; Mahmood, N.; Guo, S.; Han, R.P.S.; et al. A Dual Protection System for Heterostructured 3D CNT/CoSe2/C as High Areal Capacity Anode for Sodium Storage. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1902907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhang, W.; Wu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Li, H.; Xu, M.; Li, J.; Dai, Y.; Zong, W.; Chen, R.; He, L.; et al. Rationally Designed Sodium Chromium Vanadium Phosphate Cathodes with Multi-Electron Reaction for Fast-Charging Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2201065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Puravankara, S.; Verma, P. Jute-Fiber Precursor-Derived Low-Cost Sustainable Hard Carbon with Varying Micro/Mesoporosity and Distinct Storage Mechanisms for Sodium-Ion and Potassium-Ion Batteries. Langmuir 2022, 38, 15703–15713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chao, D.; Zhu, C.; Yang, P.; Xia, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Fan, X.; Savilov, S.V.; Lin, J.; Fan, H.J.; et al. Array of Nanosheets Render Ultrafast and High-Capacity Na-Ion Storage by Tunable Pseudocapacitance. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Morphological characterization of the VSe2, MWCNT, VSe2@MWCNT. (a) Illustration of flake-like VSe2, (b) SEM image of VSe2, (c) HRTEM of VSe2. (d) TEM image of MWCNT. (e) SEM image, (f) TEM image of VSe2@MWCNT.
Figure 1. Morphological characterization of the VSe2, MWCNT, VSe2@MWCNT. (a) Illustration of flake-like VSe2, (b) SEM image of VSe2, (c) HRTEM of VSe2. (d) TEM image of MWCNT. (e) SEM image, (f) TEM image of VSe2@MWCNT.
Materials 16 01253 g001
Figure 2. (a) TEM image of VSe2. Elemental mapping image of (b) vanadium, (c) selenium. (d) EDS spectrum.
Figure 2. (a) TEM image of VSe2. Elemental mapping image of (b) vanadium, (c) selenium. (d) EDS spectrum.
Materials 16 01253 g002
Figure 3. Crystallinity and composition. (a) XRD patterns of the VSe2, MWCNT, VSe2@MWCNT. (b) XPS V 2p, (c) XPS Se 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 (d) XPS C 1s of the VSe2@MWCNT, (e) Raman spectrum of the VSe2@MWCNT.
Figure 3. Crystallinity and composition. (a) XRD patterns of the VSe2, MWCNT, VSe2@MWCNT. (b) XPS V 2p, (c) XPS Se 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 (d) XPS C 1s of the VSe2@MWCNT, (e) Raman spectrum of the VSe2@MWCNT.
Materials 16 01253 g003
Figure 4. Electrochemical properties over a voltage window between 0.01 to 2.7 V versus Na/Na+ (a) Cyclic voltammetry at a scan rate of 1 mVs−1 of VSe2@MWCNT and (b) charge/discharge curve at a current density of 0.05 Ag−1 of VSe2@MWCNT. (c) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy diagram and (d) rate capabilities at different current densities of MWCNT and VSe2@MWCNT. (e) cycling performance and coulombic efficiency of VSe2@MWCNT at a current density of 0.01 Ag−1.
Figure 4. Electrochemical properties over a voltage window between 0.01 to 2.7 V versus Na/Na+ (a) Cyclic voltammetry at a scan rate of 1 mVs−1 of VSe2@MWCNT and (b) charge/discharge curve at a current density of 0.05 Ag−1 of VSe2@MWCNT. (c) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy diagram and (d) rate capabilities at different current densities of MWCNT and VSe2@MWCNT. (e) cycling performance and coulombic efficiency of VSe2@MWCNT at a current density of 0.01 Ag−1.
Materials 16 01253 g004
Figure 5. Quantitative capacitive analysis of VSe2@MWCNT: (a) CV curves at various scan rates from 0.2 to 2 mVs−1, (b) the relationship between scan rate and peak current, (c) the capacity contribution in CV curve at 1 mVs−1, (d) the proportion of capacitive contributions at various scan rates.
Figure 5. Quantitative capacitive analysis of VSe2@MWCNT: (a) CV curves at various scan rates from 0.2 to 2 mVs−1, (b) the relationship between scan rate and peak current, (c) the capacity contribution in CV curve at 1 mVs−1, (d) the proportion of capacitive contributions at various scan rates.
Materials 16 01253 g005
Table 1. Comparison of electrochemical performance of different kinds of binder-free electrode materials.
Table 1. Comparison of electrochemical performance of different kinds of binder-free electrode materials.
MaterialYearPotentialTemplatesSynthetic MethodsElectrochemical PerformanceReference
VSe2@MWCNT20230.01–2.7 VFreeVacuum filtrate469.1 mAg−1 at 10 mAg−1
after 200 cycles
This work
FeS@C20220.5–3.0 VCarbon clothHydrothermal method and carbonization150 mAhg−1 at 12 C
after 200 cycles
[11]
VSe2/NCNFs20200.01–3.0 VCarbon fibersElectrospinning420.8 mAhg−1 at 50 mAg−1[13]
Ultralong Sb2Se320160.01–3.0 VFreeVacuum filtrate289 mAhg−1 at 100 mAg−1
after 50 cycles
[56]
MoS2/graphene composite paper20140.0–2.25 VFreeVacuum filtrate218 mAhg−1 at 25 mAg−1
after 20 cycles
[57]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, Y.; Lee, M.E.; Kim, G.; Seong, H.; Nam, W.; Kim, S.K.; Moon, J.H.; Choi, J. Hybrid Nano Flake-like Vanadium Diselenide Combined on Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube as a Binder-Free Electrode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Materials 2023, 16, 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031253

AMA Style

Jin Y, Lee ME, Kim G, Seong H, Nam W, Kim SK, Moon JH, Choi J. Hybrid Nano Flake-like Vanadium Diselenide Combined on Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube as a Binder-Free Electrode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Materials. 2023; 16(3):1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031253

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Youngho, Min Eui Lee, Geongil Kim, Honggyu Seong, Wonbin Nam, Sung Kuk Kim, Joon Ha Moon, and Jaewon Choi. 2023. "Hybrid Nano Flake-like Vanadium Diselenide Combined on Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube as a Binder-Free Electrode for Sodium-Ion Batteries" Materials 16, no. 3: 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031253

APA Style

Jin, Y., Lee, M. E., Kim, G., Seong, H., Nam, W., Kim, S. K., Moon, J. H., & Choi, J. (2023). Hybrid Nano Flake-like Vanadium Diselenide Combined on Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube as a Binder-Free Electrode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Materials, 16(3), 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031253

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop