Next Article in Journal
Chloride Penetration of Recycled Fine Aggregate Concrete under Drying–Wetting Cycles
Next Article in Special Issue
Formation of PLGA–PEDOT: PSS Conductive Scaffolds by Supercritical Foaming
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Trends in Hydroxyapatite Supplementation for Osteoregenerative Purposes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Day-and-Night NO2 Abatement by Polyaniline/TiO2 Nanocomposites

by
Daniela Meroni
1,2,
Melissa G. Galloni
1,2,
Carolina Cionti
1,
Giuseppina Cerrato
3,
Ermelinda Falletta
1,2,* and
Claudia L. Bianchi
1,2
1
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Camillo Golgi 19, 20133 Milano, Italy
2
Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali (INSTM), via Giusti 9, 50121 Florence, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Torino, via Pietro Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(3), 1304; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031304
Submission received: 20 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 1 February 2023 / Published: 3 February 2023

Abstract

:
Finding innovative and highly performing approaches for NOx degradation represents a key challenge to enhance the air quality of our environment. In this study, the high efficiency of PANI/TiO2 nanostructures in the NO2 abatement both in the dark and under light irradiation is demonstrated for the first time. Heterostructures were synthesized by a “green” method and their composition, structure, morphology and oxidation state were investigated by a combination of characterization techniques. The results show that the unique PANI structure promotes two mechanisms for the NO2 abatement in the dark (adsorption on the polymeric chains and chemical reduction to NO), whereas the photocatalytic behavior prevails under light irradiation, leading to the complete NOx degradation. The best-performing materials were subjected to recycling tests, thereby showing high stability without any significant activity loss. Overall, the presented material can represent an innovative and efficient night-and-day solution for NOx abatement.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Air pollution today continues to pose a threat to health worldwide. Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that about 4.2 and 3.8 million deaths per year are due to the exposure to outdoor air pollution and to the household exposure to smoke from dirty cookstoves and fuels, respectively. In addition, about 91% of the world population lives in places where the air quality exceeds the WHO guideline limits [1]. All these updates suggest that a proper control of air pollutant emissions is required.
Among the main classes of air pollutants, nitrogen oxides (NOx) identify a family of binary compounds of nitrogen and oxygen, including nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) [2,3]. Both these species have been considered extremely harmful pollutants since 1952, when their role in the formation of photochemical smog was confirmed [4]. However, more in detail, NO, a colorless gas, is about four times less toxic than NO2, a reddish-brown gas [5,6].
In this drastic scenario, over the years numerous strategies have been developed and properly optimized with the final aim of decomposing NOx species. Among all the possibilities, their selective catalytic reduction by ammonia as a reducing agent (NH3-SCR) is one of the most studied and applied technologies [7,8,9], as well as absorption and adsorption routes [6,10]. However, from a practical viewpoint all these techniques suffer from several drawbacks, limiting their real application [3,8,11]. In this context, the ever more stringent legislative constraints related to NOx emissions are spurring the optimization of highly efficient techniques for NOx abatement [12]. Following these perspectives, innovative strategies based on the photocatalysis principles have emerged due to their efficiency, high sustainability and potential for integration in air purification systems [6,13,14,15,16].
For several years, titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been the most exploited photocatalytic system for a wide variety of applications, ranging from pollution abatement (in terms of water and air remediation) [17,18,19] to energy conversion [18,20]. TiO2 has gained research community attention because of some interesting features, such as wide availability, chemical stability, and low cost. It is characterized by a wide energy bandgap (3.2 eV for anatase, and 3.0 eV for rutile) [21,22,23] that makes it highly active in the ultraviolet region [24,25].
Limiting the attention on the NOx photodegradation, several works report the successful use of TiO2-based materials as photocatalysts [20,26,27,28,29,30,31]. While TiO2 displays good activity under UV-A, under LED light, pristine TiO2 is not able to reach the high value of NOx conversion. When promoted by metal species of photocatalytic interest (i.e., silver), it can produce enhanced activity under visible light, achieving up to 80% NOx conversion [32]. However, it has to be underlined that TiO2 remains inactive in the dark [33]. The performances of TiO2-based photocatalysts have been also largely investigated in outdoor experiments in streets, as summarized in different works [6,34,35]. In general, when TiO2-based photocatalysts are used as components of paints, asphalts and concretes, they are able to confer a unique activity in the NO photodegradation, thus demonstrating their successful application in several sectors [35]. In a more specific way, as examples, Qi et al. demonstrated that the addition of TiO2 to a polyacrylonitrile-styrene-acrylate resin results in a successful strategy to obtain an enhanced solar reflectance [36]. Moreover, Chen et al. realized a complete evaluation related to the NOx photodegradation on active concrete road surfaces in both laboratory and real scale application, demonstrating that TiO2-activated concrete road has good purifying effects toward NOx and the cost application was found to be very competitive [37]. However, if on the one hand the photodegradation tests carried out at laboratory scale are mostly promising, on the other hand the tests obtained for real applications are often conflicting and not always encouraging, making hard to draw general conclusions [38,39]. In fact, in real scenarios the different meteorological conditions (wind speed, humidity level, irradiation level, rainfall level, etc.), as well as the variable traffic intensity strongly affect the materials performances. Photocatalytic NOx abatement in real outdoor settings is known to be hampered by issues such as insufficient contact time and adsorption competition by air humidity. In this respect, a potential solution could be represented by a combination of an adsorbent and a photocatalyst, as here proposed.
Conducting organic polymers (COPs) have recently emerged as interesting materials in environmental remediation [40,41,42]. In general, they are employed as adsorbents for the removal of several types of pollutants (dyes [43,44], metals [45,46]) or as photosensitizers [47,48,49,50]. Among COPs, polyaniline (PANI) occupies a special place for its unique characteristics and, therefore, it can be considered a valid candidate to be used in the fields, where its interesting redox properties related to the presence of imino-quinoid/amino-benzenoid groups can make the difference [42,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. So far, concerning NOx, COPs have been largely studied to fabricate gas sensors [59,60,61]. Indeed, they can be coupled with other materials (e.g., carbon nanotubes, CNTs, TiO2, SnO2, ZnO), obtaining interesting systems composed of three elements. This strategy has been adopted to overcome the limitations related to binary composites (e.g., weak and slow interaction between the sensing material and the target gas and low response) [62,63,64,65,66,67]. By way of example, Yun et al. prepared a PANI/MWCNT/TiO2 composite sensor described by modest selectivity to NO, but with excellent reproducibility [68]. Then, Xu et al. fabricated a SnO2/ZnO/PANI composite thick film able to give high sensor response at 180 °C to NO2 (35 ppm) in only 30 s [69]. However, a common limitation of these systems is their poor stability and sensitivity [70].
Following these premises, in this work, for the first time, we present the results obtained in the NO2 abatement under both dark and light irradiation by PANI/TiO2 nanocomposites properly projected. PANI/TiO2 heterostructures were fabricated by an innovative green UV-assisted procedure and characterized by a combination of physicochemical techniques (PXRD, UV-vis, FTIR, SEM-EDS, BET, TG) [56]. The amount of PANI in the final composite was accurately dosed to the final enhancement of the night-time activity without affecting photocatalytic properties. The role of PANI in the NO2 abatement was also investigated based on its physicochemical characteristics. The best materials were subjected to recycling tests to demonstrate their stability in the working conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

PANI-TiO2 heterostructures were synthesized according to a previously reported procedure [56,71].
In brief, Evonik P25 TiO2 (anatase: rutile 80: 20, 50 m2/g) was added under vigorous stirring to 290 mL of an aqueous solution prepared by dissolving 1 g of N-(4-aminophenyl)aniline in HCl 0.1 M. The use of HCl is crucial not only to solubilize the reagent (N-(4-aminophenyl)aniline), but also for the progress of the reaction that requires acidic conditions and to obtain the final PANI in its conducting form (half-oxidized and half-protonated). Then, the suspension was irradiated with a UV halogen lamp (500 W, 30 mW/cm2) for 2 h and subsequently stirred in the dark for further 4 h at room temperature. TiO2 particles guarantee the formation of PANI oligomers and act as catalysts during the subsequent step that consists in the addition of a suitable amount of 30% H2O2 aqueous solution to carry out oxidative polymerization reaction. The reaction mixture was then stirred in the dark and at room temperature for 1 day. Finally, the precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with water and acetone and dried at room temperature. Samples with different TiO2 contents were synthesized by varying the (N-(4-aminophenyl)aniline: TiO2: H2O2 molar ratios, namely 1.0:0.4:3.0, 1.0:0.4:1.0 and 1.0:0.8:1.0, which will be named PANI-TiO2_15%, PANI-TiO2_31% and PANI-TiO2_67%, respectively, where the percentage is related to the amount of the polymer in the final composites.
For the sake of comparison, pure PANI samples, prepared according to the literature syntheses, were also investigated as the references. The first, labeled as PANI_ref1, was prepared according to a conventional synthetic approach [51,72] starting from 0.04 M aniline aqueous solution acidified by HCl (aniline/HCl molar ratio = 0.1) and using K2S2O8 as oxidant. The reaction was carried out at 0 °C, adopting an aniline/K2S2O8 molar ratio of 0.67. The precipitate was collected by filtration after 8 h, then washed with water and acetone and dried at room temperature.
A second reference (named PANI_ref2) sample was synthesized from N-(4-aminophenyl)aniline using H2O2 as the sole oxidant in the presence of FeCl3 (N-(4-aminophenyl)aniline/Fe3+ = 4000 wt/wt), able to catalyze the oxidative polymerization reaction [73,74]. In brief, 2.35 mL of 30% H2O2 aqueous solution was added to 250 mL of an aqueous solution prepared by dissolving 1 g of N-(4-aminophenyl aniline) in HCl 0.1 M. Then, 0.15 mL of a 5 g/L FeCl3 aqueous solution was added. The precipitate was collected by filtration after 24 h, washed with water and acetone and dried at room temperature.

2.2. Sample Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRP) was performed on a Philips PW 3710 Bragg–Brentano goniometer equipped with a graphite-monochromatic Cu Kα radiation source, scintillation counter, 1° divergence slit, 0.2 mm receiving slit and a 0.04° Soller slit system. Diffractograms were collected at a nominal X-ray power of 40 kV and 40 mA, in a 2θ range between 10° and 80°.
Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were collected on a TGA/DSC 3+ Mettler Toledo instrument equipped with a 70 μL alumina crucible. Measurements were carried out between 30 and 900 °C with a heating rate of 5 °C/min and in air.
Specific surface area values were determined from adsorption isotherms of N2 in subcritical conditions, measured using a Coulter SA3100 instrument (Beckman Life Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA) by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) model.
UV-vis absorption spectra of the samples, dissolved in DMF with and without the HCl addition, were recorded in 200–1000 nm range on a Shimadzu UV-2600 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan).
Fourier Transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were measured on a PerkinElmer Spectrum 100 spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA), working in attenuated total reflectance mode in 400–4000 cm−1 range.
The morphologic characterization was carried out without any sample pretreatment using a scanning electron microscope, operating with a Field Emission source (model TESCAN S9000G, (Overcoached, Germany); Source: Schottky type FEG; Resolution: 0.7 nm at 15 keV (in In-Beam SE mode) and equipped with EDS Oxford Ultim Max (operated with Aztec software 6.0).

2.3. NO2 Abatement

A total of 50 mg of each material was suspended in 5 mL isopropanol and sonicated by an ultrasonic bath to obtain a uniform dispersion. After 10 min, the mixture was deposited on a glass plate (3.3 cm × 11.5 cm) and dried in air overnight to obtain a thin film. Then, the glass plate was placed inside a 20 L Pyrex cylindrical batch reactor and NO2 gas abatement tests were performed. They were carried out at room temperature for 3 h in the dark and under both LED (350 mA, 9–48 V, 16.8 W, 2900 lx) and UVA (λmax = 365 nm, 100 W/m2) irradiation. The initial concentration of NO2 was 500 ± 50 ppb. An ENVEA AC32e directly connected to the reactor measured the NOx (NO and NO2) concentration at 30, 60 and 180 min by chemiluminescence principle. Photolysis tests indicate 10% pollutant degradation after 3 h of UVA light irradiation.

2.4. Reusability Tests

PANI_ref1, bare TiO2 and PANI-TiO2_31% were selected to be tested for four consecutive tests to evaluate their stability. The samples were prepared as described in Section 2.1. The tests were carried out at room temperature, exposing the material to 500 ppb of NO2. PANI_ref1 was maintained in the dark for 3 h, whereas bare TiO2 and PANI-TiO2_31% were maintained in the dark for 1 h and then irradiated by UVA light for other 2 h. The chemiluminescence detector monitored NO, NO2 and NOx concentration at 30, 60 and 180 min. After each test, the material was removed from the reactor, left in air for 12 h and then used for the subsequent cycle.

3. Results and Discussion

All the synthesized materials were characterized by several techniques (TG, BET, PXRD, SEM-EDS, FTIR and UV-vis) and used for the NO2 abatement, as described below.

3.1. Materials Characterization

PANI-TiO2 composites with different TiO2 contents (from 15 to ca. 67%) were prepared varying the reactant molar ratios.
The actual composition, determined by TG analyses in air and expressed as weight percentage, is reported in Table 1, whereas the relative TG curves of the pristine PANIs and PANI-TiO2 composites are reported in Figure S1 and Figure 1.
Physisorbed water content was determined from the weight loss at around 100 °C, whereas the HCl amount was related to the weight loss at 150–200 °C and the polymer content was estimated from the weight loss starting around 350 °C, assigned to the polymer backbone degradation. The remaining fraction at 700 °C was attributed to TiO2. Interestingly, the thermal stability of the polymer backbone is affected by the TiO2 content, as higher oxide amounts weaken the polyaniline inter-chain interactions [75].
The different PANI content is also appreciable in the PXRD patterns (Figure 2) from the relative intensity of the peaks attributed to the TiO2 polymorphs (anatase and rutile) and to the ES-I phase of the polymer [76] (Figure 2, inset). Moreover, decreasing the PANI content leads to a more ordered arrangement of the polymer chains, i.e., a higher crystallinity of the PANI phases, as appreciable from the better resolved peaks.
The enhanced crystallinity of the PANI-TiO2 heterostructures with higher oxide content pairs with the larger specific surface area values that are greatly promoted compared to the PANI reference materials (Table 1 and Figures S2 and S3). These differences between the nanocomposites and pristine PANIs can be traced back to the morphologies observed by SEM analyses. While the PANI_ref2 displays a compact morphology (Figure S4), PANI-TiO2 composites are composed of a matrix of PANI nanorods and aggregates of rounded oxide nanoparticles (Figure 3). Among them, the PANI-TiO2_15% sample presents a less porous structure (Figure 3a) with PANI rods that look fused, explaining the lower surface area. PANI_ref1 displays an intermediate surface area, which could be related to its coral-like structure, displaying micrometric rods covered by nanometric spikes (Figure 3d).
The different structural features of the synthesized materials can be associated with the diverse synthetic mechanisms involved. In fact, the traditional synthesis of PANI_ref1 consists in a two-steps reaction, involving the production of active radical species (aniline and its dimers) during the step 1, followed by a chain elongation process (step 2) [55]. The possibility to control the first step permits obtaining well organized structures characterized by high surface areas and porous morphologies. Similarly, the synthesis of PANI/TiO2 composites follows the same approach. However, as shown in Table 1, in this case the control of the radical species’ production is correlated to the TiO2 quantity. In fact, for low amount of oxide particles, materials with poor characteristics are obtained (low value of surface area and more compact morphology). On the contrary, when the first step of the reaction occurs in the presence of larger amount of TiO2, the properties of the final composites improve. It is supposed that the first step of the reaction consists in the UV-mediated PANI oligomer formation on the TiO2 surface and that, during the second step, the oligomers’ polymerization occurs [71].
On the contrary, the reaction that leads to the production of PANI_ref2 does not permit a fine control of the radicals formation, because the oxidative polymerization of N-(4-aminophenyl)aniline is too fast to be controlled, leading to a decrease in the structural characteristics of the synthesized product [55].
EDX mapping of the PANI-TiO2 composites confirms the non-uniform distribution of the oxide nanoparticles in the polymer matrix. In particular, the TiO2 particles seem to be localized along the polymer fibers (Figure 4).
FTIR spectra (Figure 5) confirmed the formation of PANI in its emeraldine form, as appreciable from the similar relative intensity of the band of the quinoid ring C=C stretching (1570 cm−1) and of the stretching mode of the benzenoid ring (1490 cm−1) [51]. The band at about 1300 cm−1 is attributed to the C-N bending vibration in aromatic amines, whereas those at 1070 cm−1 and 870 cm−1 are related to the in-plane and out-of-plane bending modes of C-N. The stretching mode of N=Q=N (Q = quinoid ring) is responsible for the band at 1000 cm−1. Similar results were obtained for the two pristine PANI samples (Figure S5). The absence of signals in the 3600–3700 cm−1 region, characteristic of the free hydroxyl groups of TiO2, suggests a complete coating of TiO2 particles with the PANI matrix.
This observation is also supported by the UV-vis spectra of the samples dissolved in DMF (Figure 6), where the signals of both the oxidized and reduced part of the polymer are appreciable. As an example, the UV-vis spectrum of PANI-TiO2_31% is shown in Figure 6. In particular, the π − π* transition of benzene is observed at ca. 310 nm, whereas the band at 580 nm can be attributed to the azaquinoid moieties π − π* transition band. Upon the HCl addition, the characteristic bands of emeraldine salt are observed, testifying the acid-base properties of the polymer: the signal around 310 nm is due to benzene rings, whereas the band around 430 nm is attributed to π − polaron and polaron − π* transitions, and the band at 900 nm has been related to polymer conformation changes, conjugation extension or to the de-aggregation of polymer chains in solution [77].
In contrast, the two UV-vis spectra of the two pristine PANIs show an important difference (Figure S6), strongly affecting the activity of the materials toward the NO2 abatement. In fact, comparing the intensity of the two main peaks, at ca. 310 nm and 600 nm, the second one, associated to quinone rings, is more intense for PANI_ref1, if compared to PANI_ref2, suggesting a greater number of imino-quinone rings in the chains on the polymer.

3.2. NO2 Abatement

All the synthesized materials were tested for the NOx abatement, exploiting the different characteristics of the components: redox properties and adsorption features of the PANI material and photocatalytic activity of TiO2. Figure 7 shows the results obtained when pristine PANI samples are used as active materials in dark conditions. In conditions, it was also evaluated that pristine TiO2 leads to a 5% of NOx adsorption.
Both PANI_ref1 and PANI_ref2 exhibit comparable activity in the NO2 abatement, reaching about 100% removal in 3 h (Figure 7a). If, at first, this extraordinary result could be attributed to the adsorption capability of the materials, already demonstrated for the VOC reduction in air matrix [55], the results of NOx abatement (Figure 7b) suggest otherwise. In fact, PANI_ref1 leads to the removal of 47% of the initial NOx, whereas PANI_ref2 reaches only 14% abatement. On the other hand, the NO analyses (Figure 7c) display a gradual increase in the NO amount during the tests. Based on these outcomes, it is possible to affirm that for the NOx removal, PANI acts by two simultaneous different paths: NO2 adsorption and chemical reduction in NO2 to NO, as described in Scheme 1.
The chemical reduction in NO2 to NO can be reasonably associated to the redox properties of the PANI chains. In fact, as described in Scheme 1, the amino-benzenic units are able to reduce NO2 to NO-producing imino-quinones units. In air, these latter are quickly regenerated maintaining the materials’ activity. As reported in the literature [78], NO2 is a strong electron acceptor gas able to carry out oxidation reactions. So far, the adsorption ability of PANI has been only highlighted, affirming that, at room temperature, NO2 is strongly adsorbed on the polymer, needing a proper thermal treatment for the material regeneration. Here, for the first time, we demonstrate that PANI acts through both NO2 adsorption and chemical reduction to NO that simultaneously permit the NO2 abatement.
It is worth noting that, although both the materials exhibit very similar performances in the NO2 removal, they differ in the preferential mechanism employed.
In fact, if, on the one hand, PANI_ref1 acts through both approaches, converting 54% NO2 to NO and adsorbing 46% of the initial NO2, on the other hand, PANI_ref2 proceeds almost exclusively by NO2 reduction, reducing 86% NO2 into NO and adsorbing only 14% of the initial gas. It is important to highlight that, unlike NO2, NO is not an irritant gas and much less toxic than NO2 [79]. No major role is attributed to an oxidation of inhaled NO into NO2 in the lungs since, after inhalation, NO is eliminated faster than it is oxidized NO [80].
The different behavior of the two polymers can be attributed to their difference in specific surface area values and oxidation level of the polymeric chains, as described above in Table 1 and Figure S6.
The attempts carried out to characterize the used materials by UV-vis spectroscopy did not show any evident differences compared to the fresh ones. In fact, the low NO2 initial concentration (50 ppb) and the fast internal redox chemical rearrangement between imino-quinone and amino-benzenic units do not permit to evidence a change in the polymer structure.
The test carried out under light irradiation (both UVA and LED) led to similar results (Figures S7 and S8), confirming that, in photocatalytic processes, pristine PANI does not act as a photocatalyst, but as a photosensitizer [81].
PANI/TiO2 nanocomposites showed a behavior intermediate between that of PANI and that of bare TiO2. In fact, when exposed to NO2 gas in the dark, they maintained the same activity of pristine PANI_ref2, removing almost completely the gaseous pollutant (Figure S9a). In contrast, concerning the NOx abatement, the performance of the materials is strictly dependent on the polymer content, increasing with the amount of PANI in the composites. Passing from PANI-TiO2_15% to PANI-TiO2_67%, the NOx abatement ranges from 35% to 50% (Figure S9b). On the contrary, the percentage of NO2 converted into NO follows the opposite trend: PANI-TiO2_15% > PANI-TiO2_31% > PANI-TiO2_67% (Figure S9c), attributing to the increase in the polymer content this property of the heterostructures. As expected, in the dark, TiO2 does not show any activity in the NO2 abatement.
When exposed to UVA light irradiation, PANI/TiO2 nanocomposites exhibit superior activity compared to the two bare components (PANI and TiO2), as reported in Figure 8.
PANI/TiO2 nanocomposites maintain a high capability toward the NO2 abatement that was similar to PANIs and greater than the performance of bare TiO2. In fact, all the heterostructures can remove more than 90% NO2 in 1 h, whereas the result with pristine TiO2 settles at 70% in the same conditions (Figure 8a). Moreover, concerning the NOx abatement, the heterostructures characterized by higher TiO2 content (PANI-TiO2_15% and PANI-TiO2_31%) lead to full NOx removal in 3 h, whereas when PANI content exceeds a certain amount (PANI-TiO2_67%), the NOx degradation drops to 85% (Figure 8b). Finally, all nanocomposites in the first 30 min of light irradiation, acting by the chemical reduction path typical of PANI, convert 55–60% of initial NO2 to NO (Figure 8c). However, continuing with the irradiation, all the heterostructures are also able to degrade NO. The degradation percentage depends on the materials’ composition, leading to full NO removal in 3 h for the composites with higher TiO2 content (PANI-TiO2_15% and PANI-TiO2_31%) and 90% NO abatement for the photocatalyst more reachable in the polymer (PANI-TiO2_67%).
As reported in the literature [82], the photocatalytic NOx degradation consists in a gradual oxidation of both NO and NO2 to HNO3 or NO3 depending on the reaction conditions. However, in the presence of a certain amount of water droplets in the air (e.g., rain or artificial sprays of water), NO2 can undergo disproportionation, leading to HNO3 and NO that in air is quickly re-oxidized to NO2.
Although PANI is known to be a very promising photosensitizer able to extend the photoactivity of TiO2 in the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum, the photocatalytic tests carried out under visible light irradiation showed that, under these conditions, all the nanocomposites maintain the activity of the polymeric component without any improvement in the photocatalytic properties (Figure S10). This is associated with the low TiO2 content of the heterostructures, if compared with other similar PANI/TiO2 materials employed in the photodegradation of pollutants [83].

3.3. Reusability Tests

PANI_ref1 and PANI-TiO2_31% were selected to test their stability on the basis of the reusability tests. Each material was tested for four consecutive cycles, as reported above.
The reusability results obtained in the NO2 and NOx abatement and NO formation in the dark using PANI_ref1 as active material are reported in Figure S11, confirming the high stability of the polymer that exhibits the same behavior for all the performed tests.
As expected, bare TiO2 particles are completely inactive in the first 60 min, when the UVA light is off, whereas they quickly lead to NOx and NO2 photodegradation under light irradiation (Figure S12). The NO degradation is not reported, but the concentration was zero after light irradiation.
Figure 9 shows the results of the reusability tests performed by PANI-TiO2_31%.
PANI-TiO2_31% exhibits very high stability for all the recycle tests. It is able to degrade about 60% NO2 in the dark, converting only 20% of the initial gas to NO (Figure 9a). Under light irradiation, its photocatalytic properties prevail, leading to quite complete NOx degradation (Figure 9b,c).

4. Conclusions

In this work, PANI/TiO2 nanocomposites were properly synthesized by a green UV light-driven oxidative polymerization and used for NO2 abatement. For the first time, the double role of the PANI matrix in the NO2 removal by both adsorption and chemical reduction to NO was demonstrated. The first mechanism (adsorption) can be correlated to the van der Walls interaction as well as to the formation of hydrogen bonds between the polluting gas and the polymer’s protonated amino and imino groups. Moreover, these organic groups (in particular -NH2) are able to strongly interact with polar species such as NO2 thanks to electrostatic dipole–dipole forces resulting in enhanced adsorption. In contrast, the second one (chemical reduction) affects the amino-benzenic units of PANI that are easily oxidized to the corresponding imino-quinone groups. The double mechanism ensures the total removal of NO2 in dark conditions but at the same time the NO accumulation. However, exploiting the photocatalytic properties of the heterostructures, when UVA light is turned on, all the nanocomposites are able to complete the NOx photodegradation in 3 h.
The high stability of the materials, tested through four consecutive cycles, makes them attractive for further investigation for the realization of innovative and efficient night-and-day surfaces to be applied for indoor and outdoor environments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma16031304/s1, Figure S1: TGA curves of the pristine PANI_ref1 and the PANI_ref2; Figure S2: N2 adsorption isotherms in 0 < p/p0 < 0.2 for the samples; Figure S3: PXRD of PANI¬_ref1 and PANI_ref2; Figure S4: SEM of PANI_ref2; Figure S5: FTIR spectra of PANI_ref1 and PANI_ref2; Figure S6: UV-vis spectra of PANI_ref1 and PANI_ref2; Figure S7: (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production as a function of time for PANI1 and PANI2 under UVA light; Figure S8: (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production as a function of time for PANI1 and PANI2 under LED light; Figure S9: (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production as a function of time for TiO2 and PANI/TiO2 nanocomposites in the dark; Figure S10: (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production as a function of time for TiO2 and PANI/TiO2 nanocomposites under LED light; Figure S11: Recycle tests carried out with PANI_ref1 under dark: (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production; Figure S12: Recycle tests carried out with TiO2 under UVA irradiation: (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.F.; methodology, E.F. and D.M.; software, M.G.G.; formal analysis, E.F., C.C. and G.C.; investigation, E.F. and G.C.; resources, C.L.B.; data curation, E.F.; writing—original draft preparation, E.F., M.G.G. and D.M.; writing—review and editing, E.F. and C.L.B.; supervision, E.F.; funding acquisition, C.L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been founded by Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy (Piano Sostegno alla Ricerca, PSR 2020, linea2).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the plots within this paper are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Air Pollution. Available online: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/air-pollution (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  2. Shan, W.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, G.; Peng, Y.; Li, J.; He, H. Theory and practice of metal oxide catalyst design for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Catal. Today 2021, 376, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Campisi, S.; Galloni, M.G.; Marchetti, S.G.; Gervasini, A. Functionalized Iron Hydroxyapatite as Eco-friendly Catalyst for NH3-SCR Reaction: Activity and Role of Iron Speciation on the Surface. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 1676–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Muzio, L.J.; Quartucy, G.C. Implementing NOx control: Research to application. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1997, 23, 233–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roy, S.; Hegde, M.S.; Madras, G. Catalysis for NOx abatement. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 2283–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ângelo, J.; Andrade, L.; Madeira, L.M.; Mendes, A. An overview of photocatalysis phenomena applied to NOx abatement. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129, 522–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elsener, M.; Nuguid, R.J.G.; Krocher, O.; Ferri, D. HCN production from formaldehyde during the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over V2O5/WO3-TiO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 281, 119462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Galloni, M.G.; Campisi, S.; Marchetti, S.G.; Gervasini, A. Environmental Reactions of Air-Quality Protection on Eco-Friendly Iron-Based Catalysts. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Campisi, S.; Galloni, M.G.; Bossola, F.; Gervasini, A. Comparative performance of copper and iron functionalized hydroxyapatite catalysts in NH3-SCR. Catal. Commun. 2019, 123, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Skalska, K.; Miller, J.S.; Ledakowicz, S. Trends in NOx abatement: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 3976–3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mok, Y.S.; Lee, H. Removal of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides by using ozone injection and absorption–reduction technique. Fuel Process. Technol. 2006, 87, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ruggeri, M.P.; Nova, I.; Tronconi, E. Experimental and modeling study of the impact of interphase and intraphase diffusional limitations on the DeNOx efficiency of a V-based extruded catalyst for NH3–SCR of Diesel exhausts. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 207–208, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Control Regulations. Available online: https://www3.epa.gov/region1/airquality/nox.html (accessed on 30 November 2022).
  14. Fiorenza, R.; Spitaleri, L.; Perricelli, F.; Nicotra, G.; Fragalà, M.E.; Sciré, S.; Gulino, A. Efficient photocatalytic oxidation of VOCs using ZnO@Au nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2023, 434, 114232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nguyen, V.-H.; Nguyen, B.-S.; Huang, C.-W.; Le, T.-T.; Nguyen, C.C.; Le, T.T.N.; Heo, D.; Ly, Q.V.; Trinh, Q.T.; Shokouhimehr, M.; et al. Photocatalytic NOx abatement: Recent advances and emerging trends in the development of photocatalysts. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 121912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Galloni, M.G.; Cerrato, G.; Giordana, A.; Falletta, E.; Bianchi, C.L. Sustainable Solar Light Photodegradation of Diclofenac by Nano- and Micro-Sized SrTiO3. Catalysts 2022, 12, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Galloni, M.G.; Ferrara, E.; Falletta, E.; Bianchi, C.L. Olive Mill Wastewater Remediation: From Conventional Approaches to Photocatalytic Processes by Easily Recoverable Materials. Catalysts 2022, 12, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lasek, J.; Yu, Y.H.; Wu, C.S. Removal of NOx by photocatalytic processes. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2013, 14, 29–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nakata, K.; Fujishima, A. TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2012, 13, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Scirè, S.; Fiorenza, R.; Bellardita, M.; Palmisano, L. 21—Catalytic applications of TiO2. Titan. Dioxide (TiO₂) Its Appl. 2021, 637, 679. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rimoldi, L.; Meroni, D.; Cappelletti, G.; Ardizzone, S. Green and low cost tetracycline degradation processes by nanometric and immobilized TiO2 systems. Catal. Today 2017, 281, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ge, M.; Caia, J.; Iocozzi, J.; Cao, C.; Huang, J.; Zhang, X.; Shen, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, K.-Q. A review of TiO2 nanostructured catalysts for sustainable H2 generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 8418–8449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Linsebigler, A.L.; Lu, G.; Yates, J.T. Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bianchi, C.L.; Pirola, C.; Selli, E.; Biella, S. Photocatalytic NOx abatement: The role of the material supporting the TiO2 active layer. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 211–212, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bianchi, C.L.; Cerrato, G.; Pirola, C.; Galli, F.; Capucci, V. Photocatalytic porcelain grés large slabs digitally coated with AgNPs-TiO2. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 36117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schieppati, D.; Galli, F.; Peyot, M.L.; Yargeau, V.; Bianchi, C.L.; Boffito, D.C. An ultrasound-assisted photocatalytic treatment to remove an herbicidal pollutant from wastewaters. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 54, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, L.; Hakki, A.; Zheng, L.; Roderick Jones, M.; Wang, F.; Macphee, D.E. Photocatalytic concrete for NOx abatement: Supported TiO2 efficiencies and impacts. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 119, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ao, C.H.; Lee, S.C.; Zou, S.C.; Mak, C.L. Inhibition effect of SO2 on NOx and VOCs during the photodegradation of synchronous indoor air pollutants at parts per billion (ppb) level by TiO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2004, 49, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, L.C.; Tseng, Y.H.; Lin, H. Efficient Photodecomposition of NOx on Carbon Modified Ag/TiO2 Nanocomposites. Top. Catal. 2020, 63, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Luna, M.; Gatica, J.M.; Vidal, H.; Mosquera, M.J. One-pot synthesis of Au/N-TiO2 photocatalysts for environmental applications: Enhancement of dyes and NOx photodegradation. Powder Technol. 2019, 355, 793–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Balayeva, N.O.; Mamiyev, Z. Chapter 5—Integrated processes involving adsorption, photolysis, and photocatalysis. In Hybrid and Combined Processes for Air Pollution Control; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 117–153. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cerrato, G.; Galli, F.; Boffito, D.C.; Operti, L.; Bianchi, C.L. Correlation preparation parameters/activity for microTiO2 decorated with SilverNPs for NOx photodegradation under LED light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 253, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Giannakopoulou, T.; Todorova, N.; Romanos, G.; Vaimakis, T.; Dillert, R.; Bahnemann, D.; Trapalis, C. Composite hydroxyapatite/TiO2 materials for photocatalytic oxidation of NOx. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2012, 177, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Russel, H.S.; Frederickson, L.B.; Hertel, O.; Ellermann, T.; Jensen, S.S. A Review of Photocatalytic Materials for Urban NOx Remediation. Catalysts 2021, 11, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tundo, P.; Anastas, P.; Black, D.S.; Breen, J.; Collins, T.; Memoli, S.; Miyamoto, J.; Polyakoff, M.; Tumas, W. Special Topic Issue on Green Chemistry. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1207–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qi, Y.; Xiang, B.; Zhang, J. Effect of titanium dioxide (TiO2) with different crystal forms and surface modifications on cooling property and surface wettability of cool roofing materials. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 172, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiang, W.; Ming, C. Implementing extended producer responsibility: Vehicle remanufacturing in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, Y.K.; Hong, S.J.; Kim, H.B.; Lee, S.W. Evaluation of in-situ NOx removal efficiency of photocatalytic concrete in expressways. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2018, 22, 2274–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, L.; Qian, C.X. Study on the removal of nitrogen oxides from automobile emissions by photocatalytic functional concrete road of Nanjing Yangtze River Third Bridge. J. Henan Univ. Sci. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2009, 30, 49–52. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zivkovic, I.; Klaser, T.; Skoko, Z.; Rokovic, M.K.; Hrnjak-Murgic, Z.; Zic, M. The Impact of In Situ Polymerization Conditions on the Structures and Properties of PANI/ZnO-Based Multiphase Composite Photocatalysts. Catalysts 2020, 10, 400. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gilja, V.; Novakovic, K.; Travas-Sejdic, J.; Hrnjak-Murgic, Z.; Rokovic, M.K.; Zic, M. Stability and Synergistic Effect of Polyaniline/TiO2 Photocatalysts in Degradation of Azo Dye in Wastewater. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mandic, Z.; Rokovic, M.K.; Pokupcic, T. Polyaniline as cathodic material for electrochemical energy sources: The role of morphology. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 2941–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chowdhury, A.N.; Jesmeen, S.R.; Hossain, M.M. Removal of dyes from water by conducting polymeric adsorbent. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2004, 15, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Galloni, M.G.; Bortolotto, V.; Falletta, E.; Bianchi, C.L. pH-Driven Selective Adsorption of Multi-Dyes Solutions by Loofah Sponge and Polyaniline-Modified Loofah Sponge. Polymers 2022, 14, 4897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sall, M.L.; Diaw, A.K.D.; Gningue-Sall, D.; Aaron, S.E.; Aaron, J.J. Toxic heavy metals: Impact on the environment and human health, and treatment with conducting organic polymers, a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 29927–29942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, Z.W.; Cao, C.X.; Han, B.H. A cationic porous organic polymer for high-capacity, fast, and selective capture of anionic pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 367, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, T.; Xing, G.; Chen, W.; Chen, L. Porous organic polymers: A promising platform for efficient photocatalysis. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 332–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiang, Z.; Zhu, L.; Qi, L.; Yan, L.; Xue, Y.; Wang, D.; Chen, J.F.; Dai, L. Two-Dimensional Fully Conjugated Polymeric Photosensitizers for Advanced Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 8651–8658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lan, M.; Zhao, S.; Liu, W.; Lee, C.S.; Zhang, W.; Wang, P. Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1900132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hua, Y.; Crivello, J.V. Development of Polymeric Photosensitizers for Photoinitiated Cationic Polymerization. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 2488–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Della Pina, C.; De Gregorio, M.A.; Clerici, L.; Dellavedova, P.; Falletta, E. Polyaniline (PANI): An innovative support for sampling and removal of VOCs in air matrices. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bagheri, H.; Saraji, M. New polymeric sorbent for the solid-phase extraction of chlorophenols from water samples followed by gas chromatography–electron-capture detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 910, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Conde-Díaz, A.; Rodríguez-Ramos, R.; Socas-Rodríguez, B.; Salazar-Carballo, P.Á.; Rodríguez-Delgado, M.Á. Application of polyaniline-based magnetic-dispersive-solid-phase microextraction combined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for the evaluation of plastic migrants in food matrices. J. Chromatogr. A 2022, 1670, 462988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dziedzic, D.; Nawała, J.; Gordon, D.; Dawidziuk, B.; Popiel, S. Nanostructured polyaniline SPME fiber coating for chemical warfare agents analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1202, 339649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Della Pina, C.; De Gregorio, M.A.; Dellavedova, P.; Falletta, E. Polyanilines as New Sorbents for Hydrocarbons Removal from Aqueous Solutions. Materials 2020, 13, 2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cionti, C.; Della Pina, C.; Meroni, D.; Falletta, E.; Ardizzone, S. Photocatalytic and Oxidative Synthetic Pathways for Highly Efficient PANI-TiO2 Nanocomposites as Organic and Inorganic Pollutant Sorbents. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Bianchi, C.L.; Djellabi, R.; Della Pina, C.; Falletta, E. Doped-polyaniline based sorbents for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals and dyes from water: Unravelling the role of synthesis method and doping agent. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lyu, W.; Yu, M.; Li, J.; Feng, J.; Yan, W. Adsorption of anionic acid red G dye on polyaniline nanofibers synthesized by FeCl3 oxidant: Unravelling the role of synthetic conditions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 647, 129203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pandey, S. Highly sensitive and selective chemiresistor gas/vapor sensors based on polyaniline nanocomposite: A comprehensive review. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2016, 1, 431–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. MacDiarmid, A.G. “Synthetic Metals”: A Novel Role for Organic Polymers (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2581–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, T.; Burger, C.; Chu, B. Nanofabrication in polymer matrices. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Adhikari, B.; Majumdar, S. Polymers in sensor applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 699–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Srivastava, S.; Sharma, S.S.; Agrawal, S.; Kumar, S.; Singh, M.; Vijay, Y.K. Study of chemiresistor type CNT doped polyaniline gas sensor. Synth. Met. 2010, 160, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lobotka, P.; Kunzo, P.; Kovacova, E.; Vavra, I.; Krizanova, Z.; Smatko, V.; Stejskal, J.; Konyushenko, E.N.; Omastova, M.; Spitalsky, Z.; et al. Thin polyaniline and polyaniline/carbon nanocomposite films for gas sensing. Thin Solid Film. 2011, 519, 4123–4127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yoo, K.P.; Kwon, K.H.; Min, N.K.; Lee, M.J.; Lee, C.J. Effects of O2 plasma treat-ment on NH3 sensing characteristics of multiwall carbon nanotube/polyaniline composite films. Sens. Actuators B 2009, 143, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Geng, L.N.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Huang, X.L.; Wang, S.R.; Zhang, S.M.; Wu, S.H. Characterization and gas sensitivity study of polyaniline/SnO2 hybrid material prepared by hydrothermal route. Sens. Actuators B 2007, 120, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tai, H.L.; Jiang, Y.D.; Xie, G.Z.; Yu, J.S.; Chen, X. Fabrication and gas sensitivity of polyaniline–titanium dioxide nanocomposite thin film. Sens. Actuators B 2007, 125, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yun, J.; Jeon, S.; Kim, H. Improvement of NO gas sensing properties of polyaniline/MWCNT composite by photocatalytic effect of TiO2. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Cao, B.; Cui, D. NO2 gas sensing with SnO2–ZnO/PANI composite thick film fabricated from porous nanosolid. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 176, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Janata, J.; Josowicz, M. Conducting polymers in electronic chemical sensors. Nat. Mater. 2003, 2, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cionti, C.; Della Pina, C.; Meroni, D.; Falletta, E. Triply green polyaniline: UV irradiation-induced synthesis of a highly porous PANI/TiO2 composite and its application in dye removal. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 10702–10705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chiang, J.C.; MacDiarmid, A.G. ‘Polyaniline’: Protonic acid doping of the emeraldine form to the metallic regime. Synth. Met. 1986, 13, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, Z.; Della Pina, C.; Falletta, E.; Rossi, M. A green route to conducting polyaniline by copper catalysis. J. Catal. 2009, 267, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Falletta, E.; Costa, P.; Della Pina, C.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Development of high sensitive polyaniline based piezoresistive films by conventional and green chemistry approaches. Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 2014, 220, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mingxi, L.; Yizhu, H.; Guoxiong, S. Microstructure and wear resistance of laser clad cobalt-based alloy multi-layer coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2004, 230, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pouget, J.P.; Jozefowicz, M.E.; Epstein, A.J.; Tang, X.; MacDiarmid, A.G. X-ray structure of polyaniline. Macromolecules 1991, 24, 779–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. De Albuquerque, J.E.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Faria, R.M.; Masters, J.G.; MacDiarmid, A.G. Study of the interconversion of polyaniline oxidation states by optical absorption spectroscopy. Synth. Met. 2004, 146, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Elizalde-Torres, J.; Hub, H.; Guadarrama-Santana, A.; García-Valenzuela, A.; Saniger, J. Thermally assisted NO2 and NH3 gas desorption process in a polyaniline thin film based optochemical sensor. Rev. Mex. FíSica 2008, 54, 358–363. [Google Scholar]
  79. Recommendation from the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits for Nitrogen Monoxide, SCOEL/SUM/89, June 2014. Available online: https://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjn6PXM5_X8AhXHOnAKHekjACsQFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Fsocial%2FBlobServlet%3FdocId%3D12432%26langId%3Den&usg=AOvVaw0y20qAEUGwy3UlBw_lZgAz (accessed on 15 November 2022).
  80. Mercer, R.R. Morphometric Analysis of Alveolar Responses of F344 Rats to Sub-Chronic Inhalation of Nitric Oxide; Health Effects Institute Research Report No. 88; Health Effects Institute: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  81. Falletta, E.; Bruni, A.; Sartirana, M.; Boffito, D.C.; Cerrato, G.; Giordana, A.; Djellabi, R.; Khatibi, E.S.; Bianchi, C.L. Solar Light Photoactive Floating Polyaniline/TiO2 Composites for Water Remediation. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zouzelka, R.; Rathousky, J. Photocatalytic abatement of NOx pollutants in the air using commercial functional coating with porous morphology. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 217, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ahmad, R.; Mondal, P.K. Adsorption and Photodegradation of Methylene Blue by Using PANI/TiO2 Nanocomposite. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2012, 33, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TGA curves of the PANI-TiO2 composites.
Figure 1. TGA curves of the PANI-TiO2 composites.
Materials 16 01304 g001
Figure 2. Diffractograms of the PANI-TiO2 composites. Inset: zoomed in 12–42° region (peaks attributed to anatase and rutile TiO2 are marked with a star and a circle, respectively).
Figure 2. Diffractograms of the PANI-TiO2 composites. Inset: zoomed in 12–42° region (peaks attributed to anatase and rutile TiO2 are marked with a star and a circle, respectively).
Materials 16 01304 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) PANI-TiO2_15%, (b) PANI-TiO2_31%, (c) PANI-TiO2_67% and (d) PANI_ref1.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) PANI-TiO2_15%, (b) PANI-TiO2_31%, (c) PANI-TiO2_67% and (d) PANI_ref1.
Materials 16 01304 g003
Figure 4. SEM image (top left-hand section) and EDX mapping of PANI-TiO2_31% relative to the four elements revealed by EDX analysis (bottom left-hand section; inset: elemental composition from EDX analysis reported as weight percentage).
Figure 4. SEM image (top left-hand section) and EDX mapping of PANI-TiO2_31% relative to the four elements revealed by EDX analysis (bottom left-hand section; inset: elemental composition from EDX analysis reported as weight percentage).
Materials 16 01304 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of the PANI-TiO2 composites.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of the PANI-TiO2 composites.
Materials 16 01304 g005
Figure 6. UV-vis spectra of PANI-TiO2_31% acquired in DMF and in DMF acidified with HCl.
Figure 6. UV-vis spectra of PANI-TiO2_31% acquired in DMF and in DMF acidified with HCl.
Materials 16 01304 g006
Figure 7. (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production as a function of time for PANI_ref1 and PANI_ref2 in dark.
Figure 7. (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production as a function of time for PANI_ref1 and PANI_ref2 in dark.
Materials 16 01304 g007
Scheme 1. (a) NO2 chemical reduction and (b) NO2 adsorption by PANI.
Scheme 1. (a) NO2 chemical reduction and (b) NO2 adsorption by PANI.
Materials 16 01304 sch001
Figure 8. (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production as a function of time under UVA light.
Figure 8. (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production as a function of time under UVA light.
Materials 16 01304 g008
Figure 9. Recycle tests carried out with PANI-TiO2_31% under dark and UVA irradiation: (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production.
Figure 9. Recycle tests carried out with PANI-TiO2_31% under dark and UVA irradiation: (a) NO2 and (b) NOx removal efficiency and (c) NO production.
Materials 16 01304 g009
Table 1. Weight percentage of PANI, water, HCl and TiO2 in the synthesized samples determined from TG analyses, and specific surface area from BET model of each PANI-based material.
Table 1. Weight percentage of PANI, water, HCl and TiO2 in the synthesized samples determined from TG analyses, and specific surface area from BET model of each PANI-based material.
SampleSample Composition (TGA)SBET
(m2/g)
% PANI% TiO2% H2O% HCl
PANI-TiO2_15%70155106
PANI-TiO2_31%58316548
PANI-TiO2_67%29673147
PANI_ref182-81020
PANI_ref285-5103
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meroni, D.; Galloni, M.G.; Cionti, C.; Cerrato, G.; Falletta, E.; Bianchi, C.L. Efficient Day-and-Night NO2 Abatement by Polyaniline/TiO2 Nanocomposites. Materials 2023, 16, 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031304

AMA Style

Meroni D, Galloni MG, Cionti C, Cerrato G, Falletta E, Bianchi CL. Efficient Day-and-Night NO2 Abatement by Polyaniline/TiO2 Nanocomposites. Materials. 2023; 16(3):1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meroni, Daniela, Melissa G. Galloni, Carolina Cionti, Giuseppina Cerrato, Ermelinda Falletta, and Claudia L. Bianchi. 2023. "Efficient Day-and-Night NO2 Abatement by Polyaniline/TiO2 Nanocomposites" Materials 16, no. 3: 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop