Next Article in Journal
Prevention of Root Caries Using Oxalic Acid
Next Article in Special Issue
Microstructure and Properties of Nickel-Based Gradient Coatings Prepared Using Cold Spraying Combined with Laser Cladding Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Effect of Metal Mesh on Pulsed Eddy-Current Testing of Corrosion under Insulation Using an Early-Phase Signal Feature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feasibility Study for the Remanufacturing of H13 Steel Heat-Treated TBM Disc Cutter Rings with Uniform Wear Failure Using GMAW
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 4
10.3390/ma16041452
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of CoW/SiO2 and CoB/SiO2 Interconnects from the Perspective of Electrical and Reliability Characteristics

by
Yi-Lung Cheng
1,*,
Kai-Hsieh Wang
1,
Chih-Yen Lee
1,
Giin-Shan Chen
2 and
Jau-Shiung Fang
3
1
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chi Nan University, Puli, Nantou 54561, Taiwan
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan
3
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Formosa University, Huwei, Yunlin 63201, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(4), 1452; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041452
Submission received: 5 December 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 9 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Coating Materials Research: From Preparation to Application)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As the feature size of integrated circuits has been scaled down to 10 nm, the rapid increase in the electrical resistance of copper (Cu) metallization has become a critical issue. To alleviate the resistance increases of Cu lines, co-sputtered CoW and CoB alloying metals were investigated as conductors and barriers in this study. Annealing CoM (M = W or B)/SiO2/p-Si structures reduced the resistivity of CoM alloys, removed sputtering-deposition-induced damage, and promoted adhesion. Additionally, both annealed CoW/SiO2 or CoB/SiO2 structures displayed a negligible Vfb shift from capacitance-voltage measurements under electrical stress, revealing an effective barrier capacity, which is attributed to the formation of MOx layers at the CoM/SiO2 interface. Based on the thermodynamics, the B2O3 layer tends to form more easily than the WOx layer. Hence, the annealed CoB/SiO2/p-Si MIS capacitor had a higher capacitance and a larger breakdown strength did than the annealed CoW/SiO2/p-Si MIS capacitor.

1. Introduction

Copper (Cu) has replaced Al as a conductive material in the back-end-of-line (BEOL) interconnect of integrated circuits owing to its lower resistivity (1.67 verses 2.67 μΩ·cm) and better electromigration resistance [1,2,3]. However, as the technology node advances to 10 nm and beyond, the resistivity of Cu lines dramatically increases due to the size effect, thereby leading to an increase in resistance-capacitance delay [4]. The size effect is related to the relatively large electron mean free path (~39 nm) of Cu, inducing severe electron scattering at the sidewalls and grain boundaries, thus increasing the line resistivity. As a result, replacing Cu with an alternative metal material that has a lower product of bulk resistivity and electron mean free path (ρ0 × λ) than Cu is a feasible solution. Based on this rule, Co, Ni, and Ru, with ρ0 × λ values comparable or even lower than that of Cu, are being considered as the potential conducting materials to replace Cu for 10 nm technology nodes and beyond [5,6].
Moreover, liner and barrier layers are required for Cu metallization interconnects in order to prevent Cu migration and promote adhesion. Traditionally, a Ta/TaN bilayer is used as a liner/barrier, which is typically deposited by physical vapor deposition. As the interconnect dimension is continuously scaled down, the poor step coverage of the physical vapor deposited on the Ta/TaN bilayer, along with its high electrical resistivity, exceeding tens of μΩ·cm, not only limits the space for Cu to fill, but it also increases the overall resistivity of the Cu interconnects [7,8]. As a result, various alternative materials, such as TaSix, CoTa, CoTix, and CoW, have been proposed to replace Ta/TaN as the liner and barrier layers [9,10,11,12]. These potential candidates are typically alloying metals with a single layer, which could improve barrier properties by forming an amorphous structure or by stuffing the grain boundaries.
Here, two types of Co-alloying metals, namely CoW and CoB, are proposed as conductors and barrier layers in this study. CoW alloys have been demonstrated to act as both liner and barrier layers for replacing Ta/TaN [13,14,15]. The CoW alloy exhibits an amorphous-like phase, which can eliminate diffusion path through the grain boundaries. On the other hand, the CoB alloy has rarely been studied for interconnecting materials. Faria et al. indicated that CoB can form α-Co solid solution and Co3B when the B concentration is ≤25 atomic% [16]. For use as interconnecting materials, the formation of a Co3B compound should be avoided [17]. In order to further understand CoW and CoB alloys, this study investigated the electrical and reliability characteristics of CoW/SiO2 and CoB/SiO2 interconnects under thermal and electrical stress. Adhesion and barrier properties were also studied.

2. Experiments

In the experiment, 100-nanometer-thick, thermally grown SiO2 was coated on boron-doped p-type Si substrates. Then, Co and CoB alloys were deposited via the co-sputtering deposition method in a magnetron sputtering system using pure Co, W, and B targets. Co was deposited by using a DC power of 100 W, and W and B were deposited by various RF powers ranging from 10 to 30 W. Before deposition, all targets were pre-sputtered for 10 min to remove surface contaminations. During the deposition of the CoM (M = W or B) film, the base pressure in the deposition chamber was 5 × 10−6 torr, and the working pressure was 4 × 10−3 torr, with a fixed Ar flow-rate of 20 sccm. The distance between the targets and the substrate was 10 cm, and the substrate was without intentional heating during sputtering. The thickness of all films was controlled at 100.0 ± 3.0 nm, as determined by an alpha-step 200 profilometer. The concentration of the alloy metal M was determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Agilent 7500ce, Santa Clara, CA, USA). After deposition, both CoM/SiO2/p-Si samples were annealed at 425 °C for 2 h using a quartz tube furnace with an Ar + 5% H2 gas atmosphere.
The resistivity of the alloyed Co films was measured via the four-probe method. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM; 300 kV, Hitachi HD-2300A, Tokyo, Japan) was used to investigate the microstructure and cross-sectional profile before and after thermal annealing. The adhesion was evaluated by using tape and stud-pull tests. A commercial tape having an adhesive strength of 5.0 N/cm was adhered to the film surface, followed by a peeling-off test. Then, the number of delaminated samples was calculated.
The electrical and reliability characteristics of CoW/SiO2 and CoB/SiO2 were measured using metal–insulator–silicon (MIS) capacitors. The MIS capacitors were fabricated through a metal mask to define the top metal electrodes. The top metal electrodes were square-shaped with an area of 9.0 × 10−4 cm2. Capacitance-voltage (C-V) plots were measured using a precision impedance meter (Agilent 4284A), and current-voltage (I-V) and time-dependent-dielectric-breakdown (TDDB) plots were measured by using an electrometer (Agilent 4156C). A nitrogen gas purge was carried out during the measurements to avoid moisture absorption and metal gate oxidation. All measurements were performed at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

Table 1 shows the results of the tape and stud-pull tests of the CoW and CoB films on SiO2 before and after annealing. The Cu/SiO2 sample was also tested as a reference. A total of 81 square dots with 30 × 30 μm2 area were adhered using a commercial tape having an adhesive strength of 5 N/cm. Then, peeling-off tests were conducted, and the number of delaminated dots was calculated. As shown in Table 1, the Cu/SiO2 samples showed severe delamination, with a delamination rate of 86.2%. After annealing, all square dots were peeled off. For the as-deposited CoW/SiO2 and CoB/SiO2 films, all tested dots remained intact, indicating good adhesion for both alloyed films with SiO2. After annealing, the CoB/SiO2 samples still demonstrated a zero-delamination rate, while the delamination rate of the CoW/SiO2 samples increased to 5.0%. As the chemical reaction between the constituent elements occurred, adhesion was promoted. Hence, a better adhesion for the CoB/SiO2 samples is attributed to the chemical reaction between CoB and SiO2. Since the affinity of B to O is larger than that of W to O, B has a higher possibility of reacting with oxygen in the SiO2 [18]. The interfacial reaction is able to produce a bonding layer between CoB and SiO2, thus enhancing adhesion.
To understand the effect of the atomic ratios of M (W and B) on the level of resistivity, the resistivity values of the two CoM films with various M atomic ratios were measured. The result is shown in Figure 1a. For both the CoW and CoB films, the resistivity increased with the increasing concentration of the added alloying metal. The increase ratios were estimated to be 7.55 and 47.22 cm/atomic% for the CoW and CoB films, respectively, indicating that B has a larger impact than W in terms of increasing the resistivity of the Co films.
In the following experiments, the W and B atomic ratios of the CoM films were chosen so as to be similar, i.e., 4.84% and 4.71%, respectively, corresponding to the resistivity of 203.27 μΩ·cm for the CoW film and of 361.20 μΩ·cm for the CoB film. Figure 1b shows the change in the electrical resistivity of the CoW and CoB films before and after annealing at 425 °C. After annealing, the resistivity of both CoW and CoB films decreased, obviously owing to crystallization, defect annihilation, and grain growth [19]. The resistivity decreased to 26.95 and to 23.86 μΩ·cm for the CoW and CoB films, respectively, which is much higher than the reported 5.7 μΩ·cm of Co film [20]. This result indicates that the CoB films exhibited a larger decrease in the resistivity upon annealing. Via annealing, the resistivity of the CoB films was made similar to that of the CoW films even though the resistivity of the as-deposited CoB films is higher.
Figure 2a–c shows the cross-sectional TEM images of the CoW/SiO2 and CoB/SiO2 samples before and after 425 °C annealing for 1 h. For the as-deposited samples, both the CoW and CoB films were amorphous. Additionally, both samples had a visible interface between the CoM and SiO2 films, without the formation of an additional layer. After annealing at 425 °C, both the CoW and CoB films crystallized and were transformed into fine equiaxed grains. For the annealed CoW/SiO2 sample, the interface between the CoW and SiO2 films remained unchanged. On the other hand, after the same annealing, an ultrathin layer with an estimated thickness of 5.24 ± 0.28 nm was observed at the interface between the CoB and SiO2 films. This layer likely formed via an annealing-induced chemical interaction between B and the oxygen in the SiO2 film.
The measurements of the negative heat of WO2 and WO3 formation at 25 °C are −295 kJ/mole and −281 kJ/mole, respectively, per oxygen atom, and that of B2O3 is −421 kJ/mole per oxygen atom. The W- and B-based oxides each has a lower formation heat than does SiO2 (−455 kJ/mole per oxygen atom) [18], representing that SiO2 is more thermally stable. Hence, the W and B in the as-deposited samples could not reduce the surrounding SiO2 and form M-oxide thermodynamically. Upon annealing, the thermal energy drives the reaction between B and SiO2 to occur, thereby forming a layer of B2O3 at the CoB/SiO2 interface, as evidenced in Figure 2c. Since the formation heats of WO2 and WO3 are far lower than that of SiO2, the reaction between W and SiO2 cannot occur, even with annealing at 425 °C. As a result, no interfacial layer can be observed in the annealed CoW/SiO2 sample.
Figure 3 compares the C-V curves of the CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors before and after annealing. For both the CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors, a larger accumulation capacitance (Cacc) and negative voltage shift in the C-V curves were observed in the as-deposited samples. Additionally, the CoB-gate MIS capacitor had a higher Cacc and a larger voltage shift than did the CoW-gate samples. The result implies that the properties of MIS capacitors may be modified by the sputtering deposition of metal gates. Following thermal annealing, the Cacc values for both the CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors were reduced. Moreover, the C-V curves turned towards the right direction, with flat-band voltages (Vfb) of about −0.6 V for both samples. In this stage, the CoB-gate MIS capacitor still had a higher Cacc than that of the CoW-gate sample.
Based on the measured Cacc, the dielectric constant (k) of the SiO2 film in the MIS capacitor can be determined by using k = Caccd/ε0A. Here, ε0 is vacuum permittivity, d is film thickness, and A is the gate area. Figure 4 shows the k values of the SiO2 film in the CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors before and after 425 °C annealing. The theoretical k value of the thermally grown SiO2 film is 3.9~4.1. For the as-deposited CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors, the k values of the SiO2 films were determined to be 5.58 ± 0.32 and 6.07 ± 0.54, respectively. An increased k value demonstrates that the SiO2 film was modified during the sputtering deposition of the metal gates. During the sputtering deposition of the CoM alloys, Ar gas was ionized in the plasma environment. Vacuum ultraviolet light was also emitted. These plasma-generated species could damage the SiO2 film’s surface and produce trapped charges within the film [21]. This speculated mechanism can be confirmed by the large shifts of the C-V curves in the as-deposited samples. The Vfb values of the as-deposited CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors shifted to −6.26 V and −10.75 V, respectively, representing that positive charges were produced and trapped in the SiO2 film. The sputtering deposition of the CoB alloys produced more positive charges than that of the CoW alloys.
Annealing reduced the k values of the SiO2 films in both MIS capacitors, indicating recovery of the dielectric properties of the SiO2 film via the annealing. The k value of the SiO2 film in the annealed CoW-gate MIS capacitors was reduced to 4.12 ± 0.17, which is similar to the theoretical value of thermally grown SiO2 films. This result suggests that most of sputtering-deposition-induced damage was repaired by thermal annealing, similar to the results of our previous study [22]. For the CoB-gate MIS capacitors, the k value of the SiO2 film was reduced to 4.72 ± 0.22 by thermal annealing, but it was still higher than the theoretical value. The higher k value of the SiO2 film in the annealed CoB-gate MIS capacitors is likely attributable to the formation of an interfacial B2O3 layer, which has a higher dielectric constant than SiO2 [23].
Moreover, the Vfb values of both the CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors became ~−0.6 V after annealing. The Vfb value of an MIS capacitor is determined by the work function difference between the metal gate and the Si, provided that the used dielectric film has no charges. The theoretical work functions of p-type Si and Co are 5.25 eV and 5.00 eV, respectively [18]. Hence, the Vfb values of CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors are estimated to both be approximately −0.25 eV. The dielectric film in the MIS capacitors is thermally grown SiO2, which reportedly has a typical fixed-charge density on the order of 1010 to 1011 cm−2. These fixed charges have been reported to be positive charges due to the form of oxygen vacancies, giving rise to a Vfb shift of approximately −0.01 to −0.1 V [24,25]. Herein, annealing caused the Vfb values of both the CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors to reduce to −0.6 V, very close to the theoretical value. This result indicates that the sputtering-induced charges in the SiO2 film were passivated by annealing. Furthermore, annealing did not cause further negative Vfb shift, representing no diffusion of metal ions into the SiO2. This result reveals that CoW and CoB alloys can act as a diffusion barrier in advanced integrated circuits.
Figure 5 presents the plots of the leakage current-electric field (I-E) curves of the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors. Ten samples were measured for each condition. From the I-E plots, the breakdown field can be determined as the leakage current suddenly increases by at least three orders of magnitude to more than 10−2 A. Before breakdown, the measured leakage current of the annealed CoW-gate MIS capacitor was ~10−10A, and it and remained unchanged with the applied field, which is similar to the behavior of the annealed Co-gate MIS capacitor [26]. For the annealed CoB-gate MIS capacitor, its current increased with the applied field and was larger than that of annealed CoW-gate MIS capacitor. This transition is likely to be the formation of the interfacial B2O3 layer, which increases the leakage current.
Additionally, the breakdown field of the annealed CoB-gate MIS capacitor was 10.37 ± 0.55 MV/cm, which was higher than that of the annealed CoW-gate sample (9.72 ± 0.35 MV/cm). An increased breakdown field for the annealed CoB-gate MIS capacitor is attributed to the formation of B2O3 interfacial layer. This self-forming layer, due to thermal annealing, provides an additional resistance to failure.
Electrical stress was applied to the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors. After the application of electrical stress, C-V measurements were taken. Figure 6a,b show the plots of the normalized C-V curves for the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors, respectively, after they were subjected to electrical stress at ±9.0 MV/cm for 103 s. Under both positive-polarity and negative-polarity electrical stress, the C-V cures shifted to a negative voltage direction for both the annealed CoW-gate and the CoB-gate samples. A larger shift was observed under negative-polarity electrical stress. Figure 7 summarizes the Vfb shifts as a function of the applied field for the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors after they were subjected to electrical stress for 103 s. Whether under electrical stress with various fields in the positive- polarity or the negative-polarity, both annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors exhibited negative Vfb shifts, indicating that positive charges were introduced into the SiO2 film. The magnitude of the Vfb shift gradually increased with the increasing stress field, and it was larger with the negative-polarity electrical stress than with the positive-polarity electrical stress. Additionally, the annealed CoW-gate MIS capacitor had a larger Vfb shift than did the annealed CoB-gate sample. The Vfb shift for the annealed CoW-gate MIS capacitor became pronounced as the stress field increased to −9.0 MV/cm. Under positive-polarity electrical stress, metal ions would drift into a dielectric film, thus causing a negative Vfb shift [18,27]. As a result, the negative Vfb shift for the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors under positive-polarity electrical stress was likely caused by the drifting metal ions. In the case of the annealed Co-gate MIS capacitor, which underwent the identical electrical stress at 9.0 MV/cm, the Vfb shift was −4.25 V, which was higher than those of the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate samples. This indicates that the doping element (W or B) in the Co can prevent the drift of Co ions. Comparing the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate samples reveals that the latter had a smaller negative Vfb shift, indicating better resistance to prevent the migration of metal ions. This prevention is attributed to the formation of an interfacial B2O3 layer in the annealed CoB-gate sample.
Time-dependence-dielectric-breakdown (TDDB) tests were carried out to evaluate the long-term reliability of the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors. In a TDDB test, negative-polarity electrical stress was continuously applied to the metal gate of an MIS capacitor, and the response leakage current was continuously monitored with the stressing time. Figure 8 shows the plots of the leakage current versus the stressing time (I-t) for the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors during the TDDB tests. The MIS capacitors with different metal gates exhibited very different characteristics in the I-t curves. The curves from the annealed CoW-gate sample showed that the current increased with the stressing time and then suddenly jumped (i.e., broke down). This gradually increased current is attributed to charge trapping in the SiO2 layer. As the number of trapped charges reaches the critical value, breakdown occurs due to the formation of a conduction path. In contrast, the curves from the annealed CoB-gate sample had almost flat I-t curves, suggesting that no charges were trapped in the SiO2 layer. The differences in behavior of the I-t curves for the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors are likely to be caused by the CoM/SiO2 interface. The interfacial B2O3 layer is formed in the CoB/SiO2 structure after annealing. This layer helps to prevent charge-trapping in the SiO2 layer.
Figure 9 shows the plots of the breakdown times (tbd) of the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors as a function of the stressing electric-field. The breakdown times of both the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors decreased with increases in the applied field, indicating that the field plays an important role in controlling dielectric breakdown. Comparing the breakdown times of the annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors reveals that the latter sample had longer breakdown times, similar to the results of the breakdown field. The formation of a thick interfacial B2O3 layer and fewer electric-stress-induced charges in the annealed CoB-gate MIS capacitor are believed to be responsible for the enhanced TDDB reliability.

4. Conclusions

The electrical and reliability characteristics of CoW and CoB films on SiO2/p-Si substrates were investigated in this study. Both CoW and CoB films provided enhanced adhesion with SiO2, and thus a better diffusion barrier against Co diffusion. After annealing, the reaction between M (W or B) and SiO2 occurred, and a thin MOx layer was formed. Based on the thermodynamics, the B2O3 layer tends to form more easily than does the WOx layer, which is consistent with the TEM results. As a result, the annealed CoB/SiO2/p-Si MIS samples displayed larger breakdown fields and longer TDDB breakdown times than the annealed CoW/SiO2/p-Si MIS samples, indicating that, from the viewpoint of electrical and reliability characteristics, the CoB alloy is a promising candidate for diffusion-barrier application in advanced interconnects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-L.C.; Methodology, C.-Y.L.; Validation, C.-Y.L. and J.-S.F.; Formal analysis, K.-H.W. and C.-Y.L.; Investigation, K.-H.W.; Resources, Y.-L.C.; Data curation, J.-S.F.; Writing—original draft, Y.-L.C.; Writing—review & editing, G.-S.C. and J.-S.F.; Visualization, G.-S.C.; Supervision, Y.-L.C.; Project administration, Y.-L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan. Contract No. MOST-109-2221-E-260-010-MY2.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan, for financially supporting this research under contract MOST 109-2221-E-260-010-MY2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gonella, R. Key reliability issues for copper integration in damascene architecture. Microelectron. Eng. 2001, 55, 245. [Google Scholar]
  2. Raghavan, G.; Chiang, C.; Anders, P.B.; Tzeng, S.-M.; Villasol, R.; Bai, G.; Bohr, M.; Fraser, D.B. Diffusion of copper through dielectric films under bias temperature stress. Thin Solid Films 1995, 262, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Achanta, R.S.; Gill, W.N.; Plawsky, J.L. Predicting the lifetime of copper/barrier/dielectric systems: Insights for designing better barriers for reducing copper ion drift/diffusion into the dielectric. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 74–906. [Google Scholar]
  4. Grill, A.; Gates, S.; Ryan, T.; Nguyen, S.; Priyadarshini, D. Progress in the development and understanding of advanced low k and ultralow k dielectrics for very large-scale integrated interconnects—State of the art. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2014, 1, 011306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gall, D. Electron mean free path in elemental metals electron mean free path in elemental metals. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 85101. [Google Scholar]
  6. Feldman, B.; Park, S.; Haverty, M.; Shankar, S.; Dunham, S. Simulation of grain boundary effects on electronic transport in metals, and detailed causes of scattering. Phys. Status Solidi 2010, 247, 1791. [Google Scholar]
  7. Steinhogl, W.; Schindler, G.; Steinlesberger, G.; Traving, M.; Engelhardt, M. Comprehensive study of the resistivity of copper wires with lateral dimensions of 100 nm and smaller. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 0237061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wislicenus, M.; Liske, R.; Gerlich, L.; Vasilev, B.; Preusse, A. Cobalt advanced barrier metallization: A resistivity composition analysis. Microelectron. Eng. 2015, 137, 11. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tsyntsaru, N.; Cesiulis, H.; Pellicer, E.; Celis, J.-P.; Sort, J. Structural, magnetic, and mechanical properties of electrodeposited cobalt–tungsten alloys: Intrinsic and extrinsic interdependencies. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 104, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rafaja, D.; Schimpf, C.; Klemm, V.; Schreiber, G.; Bakonyi, I.; Péter, L. Formation of microstructural defects in electrodeposited Co/Cu multilayers. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 3211. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsyntsaru, N.; Cesiulis, H.; Budreika, A.; Ye, X.; Juskenas, R.; Celis, J.-P. The effect of electrodeposition conditions and post-annealing on nanostructure of Co–W coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2012, 206, 4262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hosseini, M.; Ando, D.; Sutou, Y.; Koike, J. Co and CoTix for contact plug and barrier layer in integrated circuits. Microelectron. Eng. 2018, 189, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yoo, E.; Moon, J.H.; Jeon, Y.S.; Kim, Y.; Ahn, J.-P.; Kim, Y.K. Electrical resistivity and microstructural evolution of electrodeposited Co and Co-W nanowires. Mater. Char. 2020, 166, 110451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Suzuki, Y.; Momose, T.; Shimogaki, Y. Precursor-based designs of nano-structures and their processing for Co(W) alloy films as a single layered/liner layer in future Cu-interconnect. J. Mater. Chem. 2015, C3, 2500. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chang, S.-Y.; Lu, C.-L. Thermal stability and interface diffusion behaviors of electrolessly deposited CoWP and Cu films. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, D234. [Google Scholar]
  16. Faria, M.I.S.T.; Leonardi, T.; Coelho, G.C.; Nunes, C.A.; Avillez, R. Microstructural characterization of as-cast Co–B alloys. Mater. Charact. 2007, 58, 358. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tsai, T.K.; Shih, I.T.; Cheng, Y.L.; Chen, G.S.; Fang, J.S. Enhancement of breakdown strength and electromigration reliability for cobalt lines lightly doped with boron. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 285, 126136. [Google Scholar]
  18. He, M.; Lu, T.-M. Metal-Dielectric Interfaces in Gigascale Electronics: Thermal and Electrical Stability; Springer Series in Materials Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 157. [Google Scholar]
  19. Perng, D.-C.; Yeh, J.-B.; Hsu, K.-C.; Tsai, S.-W. Self-forming AlOx layer as Cu diffusion barrier on porous low-k film. Thin Solid Films 2010, 518, 1648. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hosseini, M.; Koike, J. Amorphous CoTix as a liner/diffusion barrier material for advanced copper metallization. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 721, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, L.; Volders, H.; Baklanov, M.; Tokei, Z.; Pantouvaki, M.; Wilson, C.; Besien, E.V.; Beyer, G.; Claeys, C. Study of metal barrier deposition-induced damage to porous low-k materials. Microelectron. Eng. 2011, 88, 3030. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng, Y.; Peng, W.; Lee, C.Y.; Chen, G.; Lin, Y.; Fang, J.S. From electrical and reliability perspective for self-forming barrier CuSc metallization. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 65014. [Google Scholar]
  23. Szwagierczak, D.; Synkiewicz, B.; Kulawik, J. Low dielectric constant composites based on B2O3 and SiO2 rich glasses, cordierite and mullite. Ceramics 2018, 44, 14495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Osburn, C.M.; Raider, S.I. The effect of mobile sodium ions on field enhancement dielectric breakdown in SiO2 films on silicon. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1993, 120, 1369. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nicollian, E.H.; Brews, J.R. MOS (Metal Oxide Semiconductor) Physics and Technology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cheng, Y.L.; Huang, H.C.; Lee, C.Y.; Chen, G.S.; Fang, J.S. Comparison of Cu and Co Integration with Porous Low-k SiOCH Dielectric Material. Thin Solid Films 2020, 704, 138010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fisher, I.; Eizenberg, M. Copper ion diffusion in porous and nonporous SiO2-based dielectric using bias thermal stress and thermal stress tests. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516, 4111. [Google Scholar]
Materials 16 01452 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Resistivity of CoW and CoB films as a function of alloying-element concentration; (b) resistivity changes in CoW and CoB films after annealing at 425 °C.
Figure 1. (a) Resistivity of CoW and CoB films as a function of alloying-element concentration; (b) resistivity changes in CoW and CoB films after annealing at 425 °C.
Materials 16 01452 g001
Materials 16 01452 g002a 550Materials 16 01452 g002b 550
Figure 2. Cross-sectional TEM images: (a) as-deposited CuW/SiO2/Si; (b) annealed CuW/SiO2/Si; (c) annealed CuB/SiO2/Si.
Figure 2. Cross-sectional TEM images: (a) as-deposited CuW/SiO2/Si; (b) annealed CuW/SiO2/Si; (c) annealed CuB/SiO2/Si.
Materials 16 01452 g002aMaterials 16 01452 g002b
Materials 16 01452 g003 550
Figure 3. C-V curves of CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors before and after annealing.
Figure 3. C-V curves of CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors before and after annealing.
Materials 16 01452 g003
Materials 16 01452 g004 550
Figure 4. Dielectric constants of SiO2 films in CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors before and after annealing.
Figure 4. Dielectric constants of SiO2 films in CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors before and after annealing.
Materials 16 01452 g004
Materials 16 01452 g005 550
Figure 5. I-E plots of annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors.
Figure 5. I-E plots of annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors.
Materials 16 01452 g005
Materials 16 01452 g006a 550Materials 16 01452 g006b 550
Figure 6. C-V curves of annealed MIS capacitors after electrical stress at ±9.0 MV/cm for 103 s; (a) CoW-gate; (b) CoB-gate.
Figure 6. C-V curves of annealed MIS capacitors after electrical stress at ±9.0 MV/cm for 103 s; (a) CoW-gate; (b) CoB-gate.
Materials 16 01452 g006aMaterials 16 01452 g006b
Materials 16 01452 g007 550
Figure 7. Vfb shifts of annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors after electrical stress as a function of stress field.
Figure 7. Vfb shifts of annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors after electrical stress as a function of stress field.
Materials 16 01452 g007
Materials 16 01452 g008 550
Figure 8. Leakage current versus stressing time for annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors during TDDB tests.
Figure 8. Leakage current versus stressing time for annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors during TDDB tests.
Materials 16 01452 g008
Materials 16 01452 g009 550
Figure 9. Comparison of breakdown times for annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors as a function of stressing field.
Figure 9. Comparison of breakdown times for annealed CoW-gate and CoB-gate MIS capacitors as a function of stressing field.
Materials 16 01452 g009
Table
Table 1. Tape test results for Cu/SiO2, CoW/SiO2, and CoB/SiO2 before and after annealing at 425 °C.
Table 1. Tape test results for Cu/SiO2, CoW/SiO2, and CoB/SiO2 before and after annealing at 425 °C.
As Dep.Annealed
Cu/SiO286.2%100%
CoW/SiO20%5.0%
CoB/SiO20%0%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, Y.-L.; Wang, K.-H.; Lee, C.-Y.; Chen, G.-S.; Fang, J.-S. Comparison of CoW/SiO2 and CoB/SiO2 Interconnects from the Perspective of Electrical and Reliability Characteristics. Materials 2023, 16, 1452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041452

AMA Style

Cheng Y-L, Wang K-H, Lee C-Y, Chen G-S, Fang J-S. Comparison of CoW/SiO2 and CoB/SiO2 Interconnects from the Perspective of Electrical and Reliability Characteristics. Materials. 2023; 16(4):1452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041452

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Yi-Lung, Kai-Hsieh Wang, Chih-Yen Lee, Giin-Shan Chen, and Jau-Shiung Fang. 2023. "Comparison of CoW/SiO2 and CoB/SiO2 Interconnects from the Perspective of Electrical and Reliability Characteristics" Materials 16, no. 4: 1452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041452

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop