Next Article in Journal
Combustion Synthesis and Reactive Spark Plasma Sintering of Non-Equiatomic CoAl-Based High Entropy Intermetallics
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Elevated Temperature on Color Centers in LiF Crystals and Their Photoluminescence
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Fabrication of Temperature Sensors with High-Performance Uniformity through Thermal Annealing

Materials 2023, 16(4), 1491; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041491
by Hongrui Liu 1,†, Yongchun Li 2,†, Weiji Xie 2, Xinyi Zhou 1, Jishuang Hong 2, Junfeng Liang 1, Yanghui Liu 1,*, Wei Li 2,* and Hong Wang 1,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Materials 2023, 16(4), 1491; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041491
Submission received: 7 January 2023 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 8 February 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Recent Advances in Structural Health Monitoring)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Review of article:

Authors: Hongrui Liu at all. „ Fabrication of temperature sensors with high performance uniformity through thermal annealing “

Materials MDPI 2022

 

The temperature of human body is important parameters which is related to diseases of human as well as occurrence and cure diseases. Therefore, the most authors focus their interest on development of flexible temperature sensors allowed temperature measurement not only a tone point as mercury thermometer but on different place on human body.

The authors described in article the principle of flexible thermal sensors which used the different material and compared their parameters. They show, that annealing at temperature 1000C their suggest material with graphite nanoparticles improved parameters TCR, homogeneity, stability, and reproducibility of temperature measurement.  The results are presented in graph dependences of resistor on temperature in range 300C – 360C with good sensitivity.

My question to the authors: Why did not measured all present parameters for higher temperature than 360C?

The article takes important problem of human diseases a treatment and possibility to improve it. I recommend this article for publication.

Author Response

Q1: My question to the authors: Why did not measured all present parameters for higher temperature than 36 ℃?

R1: Thank you for this valuable recommendation. Since the upper limit of resistance measurement of the source meter we used is 2 × 108 Ω, the resistance of some devices might be out of range of the instrument if the temperature is above 36 ℃. Accordingly, we revise the manuscript as following:

 

In this work, a maximum temperature of 35.5 ℃ is chosen to ensure that all resistances are within the measuring range of the instrument since the upper limit of resistance measurement of the source meter we used is 2 × 108 Ω.(Page 6 line 14)

Reviewer 2 Report

1-     The annealing time is 30 s. Why? Did you try other times? What happens when it increases or decreases?

2-     Figure 6 (a,b,c) ranges of y-axis should be modulated to separate the curves more clearly.

3-     I suggest that figures (S1, S2 and S5) should be concluded inside the manuscript.

4-     Why did not you test your sensor on human?

5-     Where are experimental comparisons with other sensors (by data)?

6-     More references have to be added to the discussion section.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Manuscript ID: materials-2178306

Title: Fabrication of temperature sensors with high performance uniformity through thermal annealing

 

Authors are required to address these comments for the improvement of their paper.

 

·         What are the stability and repeatability factors of prepared composites? And what were the sample numbers used for this investigation?

·         Line number 94 “where both XRD patterns…. ” How do authors come to know the peaks are crystalline AC?

·         Figure 4 needs improvement and highlights what it indicates, particularly matrix vs. fillers.

·         What are the other limitations that need to be included? Explain how the sample's semicrystalline and crystalline nature affects its sensitivity.

 

·         4. Experimental sections 4.1. to 4.4., before 2. results and discussion, need to be replaced. Modify heading numbers accordingly.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

the revised manuscript can be accepted. 

Back to TopTop