Next Article in Journal
Hetero-Bimetallic Ferrocene-Containing Zinc(II)-Terpyridyl-Based Metallomesogen: Structural and Electrochemical Characterization
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of the Environmental Benefits of Using Wood Waste and Magnesium Oxychloride Cement as a Composite Building Material
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 5
10.3390/ma16051945
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lychee-like TiO2@Fe2O3 Core-Shell Nanostructures with Improved Lithium Storage Properties as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries

by
Yuan Chen
1,2,3,
Feihong Liu
1,
Yufei Zhao
1,
Mengdie Ding
1,
Juan Wang
1,2,3,*,
Xuan Zheng
1,2,3,
Huihu Wang
1,2,3,
Marie-Christine Record
2,4,* and
Pascal Boulet
2,5
1
Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Green Materials for Light Industry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Green Light-Weight Materials and Processing, and School of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
2
New Materials and Green Manufacturing Talent Introduction and Innovation Demonstration Base, Wuhan 430068, China
3
Hubei Longzhong Laboratory, Xiangyang 441000, China
4
Aix-Marseille University, Faculty of Sciences, IM2NP, CEDEX 20, 13397 Marseille, France
5
Aix-Marseille University, Faculty of Sciences, Madirel, CEDEX 20, 13397 Marseille, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(5), 1945; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051945
Submission received: 4 February 2023 / Revised: 21 February 2023 / Accepted: 24 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, lychee-like TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres with a core-shell structure have been prepared by coating Fe2O3 on the surface of TiO2 mesoporous microspheres using the homogeneous precipitation method. The structural and micromorphological characterization of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres has been carried out using XRD, FE-SEM, and Raman, and the results show that hematite Fe2O3 particles (7.05% of the total mass) are uniformly coated on the surface of anatase TiO2 microspheres, and the specific surface area of this material is 14.72 m2 g−1. The electrochemical performance test results show that after 200 cycles at 0.2 C current density, the specific capacity of TiO2@Fe2O3 anode material increases by 219.3% compared with anatase TiO2, reaching 591.5 mAh g−1; after 500 cycles at 2 C current density, the discharge specific capacity of TiO2@Fe2O3 reaches 273.1 mAh g−1, and its discharge specific capacity, cycle stability, and multiplicity performance are superior to those of commercial graphite. In comparison with anatase TiO2 and hematite Fe2O3, TiO2@Fe2O3 has higher conductivity and lithium-ion diffusion rate, thereby enhancing its rate performance. The electron density of states (DOS) of TiO2@Fe2O3 shows its metallic nature by DFT calculations, revealing the essential reason for the high electronic conductivity of TiO2@Fe2O3. This study presents a novel strategy for identifying suitable anode materials for commercial lithium-ion batteries.

1. Introduction

With the increase in energy consumption and environmental issues, lithium-ion batteries have attracted considerable interest as a form of energy storage technology [1,2,3]. Due to its low specific capacity and poor cycle performance at high current densities, it is increasingly challenging for commercial graphite to match the needs of lithium-ion batteries [4,5]. As a result, new commercial anode materials are required [6]. Due to their theoretical capacity, high power density, and abundance of resources, transition metal oxides have become a research hotspot for lithium-ion battery anode materials [7]. Nevertheless, the majority of transition metal oxides (including Fe2O3 [8], Fe3O4 [9], MnO2 [10], Mn2O3 [11], Mn3O4 [12], MnO [13], CuO [14], NiO [15], and Co3O4 [16]) used as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries typically experience significant volume expansion effects during the lithium insertion/extraction process. As an anode material for lithium-ion batteries, TiO2 possesses high insertion/extraction lithium-ion potential and a stable insertion/extraction lithium-ion structure in addition to high coulombic efficiency, cheap cost, stable chemical characteristics, and environmental friendliness [17,18]. However, the low electronic conductivity of TiO2 anode materials, as well as the low diffusion coefficient of lithium-ion within them, is insufficient for commercial applications.
Currently, TiO2 anode material optimization measures are primarily focused on two aspects: nanosizing and material compounding [4]. The nanoscale TiO2 anode materials can increase the contact area between the anode materials and the electrolyte, reduce the lithium-ion transport channel within the materials, and provide additional lithium-ion storage sites. Yao et al. [19] manufactured hollow spherical TiO2 anode materials, Zhao et al. [20] constructed interconnected TiO2 nanofiber anode materials, and Lu et al. [21] produced nanowire TiO2 anode materials. Compounding TiO2 with other materials can also effectively enhance the performance of anode materials [22,23,24,25]. Guan et al. [26] coated TiO2 with TiOF2, Wang et al. [27] covered a layer of MgCo2O4 on the surface of TiO2, and Li et al. [28] compounded TiO2 with C/FeS2.
Fe2O3, as a transition metal oxide, has the advantages of low cost, high theoretical capacity, abundant resources, and low power density, and therefore has attracted the interest of researchers [29,30]. The literature indicates that Fe2O3 and TiO2, two anode materials, have a synergistic effect [30,31], i.e., the composite of structurally stable TiO2 and Fe2O3 with a high theoretical capacity can effectively raise the specific capacity of the anode materials. In addition, these materials are inexpensive, abundant in resources, environmentally friendly and pollution-free, and appropriate for large-scale applications. The majority of current studies on the composite of these two materials concentrate on using Fe2O3 as a substrate and utilizing TiO2 as a stable coating layer to address the problem of high-volume expansion of Fe2O3 [4,25,31]. However, less research has been conducted on the issue of the poor specific capacity of TiO2 when combined with Fe2O3 on a TiO2 substrate.
In this study, the lychee-like core-shell structure TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres were prepared by coating a layer of Fe2O3 particles on the surface of homemade TiO2 mesoporous microspheres using the homogeneous precipitation method. In order to investigate the connection between the structure of the materials and their electrochemical performance, we first conducted the phase analysis, micromorphology characterization, and BET test on TiO2 mesoporous microspheres and TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres; subsequently, we tested and compared the electrochemical performance of these two materials as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries and discussed the differences in the electrochemical performance of the materials before and after coating. To further explore the synergistic effect of TiO2 and Fe2O3, calculations using density functional theory were made for TiO2, Fe2O3, and TiO2@Fe2O3. The results indicated that the composite of TiO2 and Fe2O3 changed the electron density of states of the material, which led to a significant increase in electrical conductivity. This research offers a novel strategy for identifying suitable anode materials for commercial lithium-ion batteries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The raw materials consisted of urea (CH4N2O, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Shanghai, China, AR), anhydrous ethanol (C2H5OH, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Shanghai, China, AR), FeCl3·6H2O (Aladdin Reagent Co., Shanghai China, ACS), Fe2O3 (Heng Xing Reagent Co., Tianjin, China, AR), commercial graphite (C, Tianjin Battery Co., Tianjin, China, AR) and tetrabutyl titanate (TBOT, Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Shanghai, China, AR). Solutions were prepared with deionized water (Molecular Lab water ultra-purifier, Shanghai, China).
The precursor TiO2 microspheres used in this study were homemade using a low-temperature modified Stöber method, which was previously reported by our group [32]. In this method, aqueous KCl and tetrabutyl titanate were added to ethanol and reacted at a low temperature of −10 °C for 5 h. The precursor was then collected by centrifugation, washed three times with alcohol and once with water, and subsequently freeze-dried, resulting in amorphous TiO2 microspheres.

2.2. Synthesis of Core-Shell Structure TiO2@Fe2O3 Microspheres

Figure 1 illustrates the preparation method for TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres with the core-shell structure. The above-mentioned TiO2 microspheres (0.3 g) were first ultrasonically dispersed in 100 mL of deionized water, followed by the addition of FeCl3·6H2O (0.5 g) and 0.5 g urea under magnetic stirring for 10 min. The above suspensions were further heated in an 80 °C water bath with magnetic stirring for 8 h to obtain intermediate microspheres according to the following reaction Equations (1) to (3):
(NH2)2CO(aq) + 3H2O→2NH4OH(aq) + CO2(g)↑
NH4OH(aq)→NH4+(aq) + OH−
[Fe(H2O)6]3+(aq) + 3OH−→Fe(OH)3(s)↓ + 6H2O
The precipitate was then collected by centrifugation, washed three times with deionized water, and dried for 12 h at 50 °C. The sample was then calcined at 600 °C for 4 h. The morphology of the sample can be altered by varying the amount of FeCl3·6H2O added. The equation corresponding to this reaction is shown in Equation (4).
2Fe(OH)3→Fe2O3 + 3H2O

2.3. Structure Analysis and Characterization

The structural properties of the products were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using an X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Empyrean, Almelo, Netherlands) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) and a 2θ scan range of 20~90° at a rate of 2°/min. Raman spectra were recorded on an XploRA PLUS spectrometer (HORIBA, Lille, France) using a 532 nm wavelength laser source.
The morphologies and elemental ratio of the samples were determined by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 5 kV with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS, X-MaxN, OXFORD, Oxford, UK).
The N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of porous products were measured using a surface area and pore size analyzer (BET, ASAP 2020 PLUS HD88, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). The specific surface area was calculated with the Brunauer—Emmett—Teller (BET) model, and the pore size distribution was evaluated using the Barrett—Joyner—Halenda (BJH) method.

2.4. Electrochemical Tests

The anode materials, cotinine black (Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Shanghai, China, AR), and the polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Shanghai, China, AR) were weighed according to the mass ratio of 8:1:1, thoroughly mixed, and the mixed sample was then placed in a beaker with N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP, Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Co., Shanghai, China, AR) to be magnetically stirred for 7 h. The slurry was coated on 20 μm thick copper foil, fully dried at 80 °C, and finally cut into 15 mm diameter discs. The solution of 1 M LiPF6 was dissolved in ethylene carbonate (EC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) as electrolyte (EC:DMC = 1:1 vol%). Polypropylene film (Celgard 2500, Celgard Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA) was used as a separator, lithium foil was used as counter and reference electrode, and CR2032 half-cells were assembled in a glove box in an argon atmosphere. The mass loading of the electrodes was around 1.0–1.4 mg cm−2. A Land CT2001A battery test system was used to measure the charge/discharge cycling performance and rate capability of the anode materials in the voltage range of 0.01~3.0 V (vs. Li/Li+). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) analysis of the anode materials was performed using an electrochemical workstation (CS350M, Corrtest Instrument Corp., Ltd., Wuhan, China) with a voltage window of 0.01~3.5 V and a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s−1. Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) were tested on the same instrument in the frequency range from 1 × 106 to 0.01 Hz.

2.5. Computational Details

The density functional theory (DFT) with the pseudopotential plane-wave (PP-PW) approach, as implemented in the VASP program package [33,34], was used to compute the total energy and density of states of TiO2, Fe2O3, and TiO2@Fe2O3. Specifically, we employed the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [35,36] functionals as proposed by Perdew and Wang (PW91) [37]. The cutoff energy of the plane-wave basis sets was set at 500 eV, and self-consistent electronic steps and structure relaxation were carried out until the energy and force thresholds of 1 × 10−6 eV/atom and 0.01 eV/Å/atom, respectively, were reached. TiO2 and Fe2O3 computations were conducted using 4 × 4 × 4 Monkhorst-Pack k-point meshes. By contrast, a Monkhorst-Pack k-point mesh of 4 × 2 × 2 was used for TiO2@Fe2O3 due to the large number of atoms (i.e., 299 atoms) contained in the supercell of TiO2@Fe2O3. Every simulation run required two processes to calculate the density of states: (1) optimizing the crystal structure to obtain the lowest possible total energy, and (2) performing self-consistent simulations using the optimized structure.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Characterization

Previously, we reported that the TiO2 mesoporous microspheres produced in our laboratory at low temperature were amorphous [32]. Figure 2a shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of the TiO2 mesoporous microspheres after calcination at 600 °C. All the diffraction peaks in the pattern correspond to the anatase TiO2 (ref. code: 98-009-6946) in the tetragonal crystal system, indicating that the structure of the TiO2 mesoporous microspheres after calcination at 600 °C is the anatase phase.
Figure 2b shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of TiO2@Fe(OH)3 microspheres generated by water bath reaction prior to calcination. There are no discernible diffraction peaks in the pattern, indicating that both TiO2 and hydroxide precipitates of Fe in TiO2@Fe(OH)3 microspheres are in an amorphous state prior to calcination. Figure 2c shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of TiO2@Fe(OH)3 microspheres after calcination at 600 °C for 4 h. The results show that all the diffraction peaks of the sample correspond to those of hematite α-Fe2O3 (ref. code: 98-003-3643) in the hexagonal crystal system and anatase TiO2 (ref. code: 98-009-6946) in the tetragonal crystal system. This indicates that the Fe(OH)3 precipitation is transformed to α-Fe2O3 through calcination, following Equation (4).
Figure 2d shows the Raman spectrum pattern of calcined TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres. Raman characteristic peaks of the sample at 142, 394, 525, and 634 cm−1 correspond to the Eg(1), B1g, A1g, and Eg(2) vibrational modes of anatase TiO2 [38], while Raman characteristic peaks of the sample at 302 and 1318 cm−1 correspond to the Eg(1) + Eg(2), Eg(3) vibrational modes of hematite Fe2O3 [31]. No characteristic peaks corresponding to the vibrational modes of other phases are detected, providing additional evidence that the TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres are composed of anatase TiO2 and hematite Fe2O3.
The above structural characterization demonstrates that after calcination, TiO2 in TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres prepared by water bath reaction transforms from the early amorphous state to the anatase phase, and the hydroxide precipitation of Fe transforms to α-Fe2O3 of hematite phase, with no other impurities being produced.

3.2. Morphological Characterization

Figure 3a,b display the FE-SEM images of the TiO2 mesoporous microspheres fabricated in our laboratory by the low-temperature modified Stöber method, from which it can be observed (1) that the surface of the microspheres is rough, (2) that there is a large number of mesopores, (3) the average diameter of the microspheres is 1~2 μm, and (4) the monodispersity of the microspheres is good, which is consistent with our previous work [32]. Figure 3c,d show the FE-SEM images of the TiO2 mesoporous microspheres after calcination at 600 °C. After calcination, the surface of the TiO2 mesoporous microspheres becomes smooth and some mesopores are closed, which may have been caused by the decrease in the surface area of the microspheres during the phase transition of TiO2, hence reducing the overall surface energy of the system. The particle size of the microspheres reduced after the calcination step. This may be due to the presence of a large number of micropores inside the uncalcined microspheres. After the calcination, because of the occurrence of crystallization, some of the stomata of this microsphere became closed, decreasing the microsphere volume. Figure 3e,f show the FE-SEM images of TiO2@Fe(OH)3 microspheres prepared by water bath reaction, from which it can be observed that the TiO2@Fe(OH)3 microspheres are uniform in size and well dispersed; compared with Figure 3a, the surface of the microspheres in Figure 3e is rougher and wrapped with a coating layer composed of fine particles, which may be the hydroxide precipitation of Fe according to the previous inference. Figure 3g,h reveal the FE-SEM images of the calcined TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres. Compared with Figure 3e, the particles covered on the surface of the microsphere sample in Figure 3g are larger, and these particles are interconnected and interlaced with one another. The surface of the sample is lychee-like, and it is inferred from the results in Figure 2d that the particulate matter covered on the surface should be α-Fe2O3; Figure 3h shows that the monodispersity of the microspheres remains good after the calcination. The above microscopic morphological characterization indicates that after the calcination, some of the micropores on the surface of TiO2 microspheres inside the sample are closed, and the surface coating layer is transformed from fine hydroxide precipitation of Fe to larger Fe2O3 particles.
To determine the elementary composition of the calcined TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, the FE-SEM image of the analysis area and the associated EDS spectrum are depicted in Figure 3i,j, respectively. It is well indicated that the TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres consist of Ti, Fe, and O elements, and the Ti/Fe atomic ratio is 1.75:23.05. The Fe element is significantly less than the Ti element, implying the thin thickness of the obtained Fe2O3 coating layer. To have a clear insight into the distribution of elements in the TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, elemental mappings based on the analysis area are derived, as shown in Figure 3k–m. Perspicuously, the profiles of three-element mapping show a uniform distribution of Ti, Fe, and O elements, which further indicates a better compound between Fe2O3 and TiO2. The theoretical specific capacity C of the TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres is calculated from the Fe/Ti atomic ratio, molar masses of TiO2 and Fe2O3, theoretical specific capacity of TiO2 and Fe2O3 and Equation (5) and is 382.38 mAh g−1 [39,40].
C(TiO2@Fe2O3) = C(TiO2) × wt%(TiO2) + C(Fe2O3) × wt%(Fe2O3)
= 335 × 92.95% + 1007 × 7.05% = 382.38 mAh g−1

3.3. BET Analysis

As shown in Figure 4a, the nitrogen adsorption—desorption isotherms of the TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres exhibit the type IV nitrogen adsorption branch with a type-H3 hysteresis loop, confirming the presence of mesopores in the TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres [7]. The Brunauer—Emmett—Teller (BET) surface area is calculated to be 14.72 m2/g. Figure 4b shows the corresponding Barrett—Joyner—Halenda (BJH) pore-size distribution of the pores in the sample, and it can be seen that the pore size in the sample is mainly distributed from 1 to 10 nm, and the average pore volume is calculated to be 0.0437 cm3/g. The results show that after calcination, the pores in TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres are mainly micropores and mesopores, which is consistent with the SEM observation.

3.4. Electrochemical Performance

To investigate the influence of the Fe2O3 coating layer on the electrochemical performance of TiO2, we fabricated half-cells with the calcined TiO2 (anatase) and TiO2@Fe2O3 as anode materials (working electrode), tested and compared their electrochemical performance. To compare the lithiation reactions of TiO2, Fe2O3, and TiO2@Fe2O3 while observing whether there are other side reactions of homemade TiO2, we chose a large test voltage range from 0.01 to 3.5 V. Figure 5a,b show the cyclic voltammetry curves of the above two microspheres for the initial three cycles at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s. As shown in Figure 5a, for calcined TiO2, a distinct reduction peak first appears at 1.7 V during the first discharge, which together with the oxidation peak at 2.2 V during the charging process corresponds to the characteristic peaks of the lithium-ion insertion/extraction reactions in anatase TiO2 [8], as shown in Equation (6).
TiO2 + xLi+ + xe− ↔ LixTiO2
Subsequently, a significant reduction peak appears at 0.6 V and disappears in subsequent cycles, which may be due to the insertion of Li+ into the irreversible site and the generation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer [38,39]. In the two subsequent cycles, there is a tendency for the CV curves to overlap, indicating a gradual stabilization of the lithium-ion insertion/extraction reaction in the TiO2 anode material.
As shown in Figure 5b, for the TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material, the reduction peak first appears at 1.7 V during the first discharge, and this peak similarly corresponds to the characteristic peak of the Li+ insertion/extraction reaction in anatase TiO2 together with the oxidation peak at 2.2 V during the charging process. Subsequently, a continuous reduction peak at 0.4~1.0 V corresponds to the multistep reduction of Fe2O3 to Fe0 according to Equations (7) and (8), which shifts to a reduction peak at 0.7 V during the subsequent cycles [25,30]. Presumably, the disappeared reduction peak corresponds to the insertion of Li+ into the irreversible site and the generation of the SEI layer [31] (Figure S1 shows the CV curve of hematite Fe2O3, in which these peaks also appear, further proving that these peaks belong to Fe2O3). This reduction peak at 0.7 V together with the broad oxidation peak at 1.5~2.0 V during the charging process corresponds to the characteristic peaks of the Li+ insertion/extraction reactions in α-Fe2O3 as shown in Equation (9).
Fe2O3 + 2Li+ + 2e− → Li2(Fe2O3)
Li2(Fe2O3) + 4Li+ + 4e− → 2Fe0 + 3Li2O
Fe2O3 + 6Li ↔ 2Fe + 3Li2O
Therefore, the total Li+ insertion/extraction reactions of TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material are shown in Equations (6) and (9). In the two subsequent cycles, the CV curves tend to overlap, demonstrating that the Li+ insertion/extraction reactions in TiO2@Fe2O3 gradually stabilize.
Figure 6a depicts the charge/discharge curves of the anode material calcined anatase TiO2 at a current density of 0.2 C. During the first discharge, a distinct plateau appears at 1.75 V. This plateau together with the one appearing at 2.0 V during the charging process corresponds to the insertion/extraction process of lithium-ions in the interstitial octahedral sites of anatase TiO2, with the chemical reaction shown in Equation (6). Subsequently, a slow ramp appears between 0.9~0.7 V and disappears in the subsequent cycles, which may be due to the generation of the SEI layer and the insertion of Li+ into the irreversible site [38,39]. This result is in accordance with the analysis of Figure 5a. In the first charge/discharge cycle, the initial discharge- and charge-specific capacities of the battery are 335.2 and 178.6 mAh g−1, respectively, corresponding to the initial coulombic efficiency (ratio of charge capacity to discharge capacity) of only 53.3%; the large capacity loss may be attributed to the generation of the SEI layer and the insertion of Li+ into the irreversible site [38,39].
Figure 6b shows the charge/discharge curves of the TiO2@Fe2O3 anode material at a current density of 0.2 C. Similarly, the plateau that appears at 1.75 V during the first discharge along with the plateau at 2.0 V during the charging process corresponds to the insertion/extraction process of lithium-ions in the interstitial octahedral sites of anatase TiO2. Subsequently, a distinct plateau occurs around 0.8 V, which evolves into a section of slope at 1.0~0.7 V during the following cycles. This slope, together with the slope at 1.5~2.0 V during charging, corresponds to the insertion/extraction process of lithium-ions in α-Fe2O3 as shown in Equation (9), and this finding is consistent with the analysis of Figure 5b. The initial discharge- and charge-specific capacities of the TiO2@Fe2O3 anode material are 698.5 and 476.5 mAh g−1, respectively, and the reversible capacity (the portion of capacity that can participate in both charging and discharging within a single cycle, i.e., the minimum of the discharge-specific capacity and the charge-specific capacity) is 476.5 mAh g−1, which is larger than the theoretical specific capacity 382.38 mAh g−1 of TiO2@Fe2O3 previously obtained by calculation (see Equation (5)), which may be mainly attributed to the synergistic effect of TiO2 and Fe2O3 [30,31] and the additional lithium storage sites provided by the larger specific surface area of the material (the surface of the material is more likely to form point defects, thus providing more lithium storage sites and increasing the specific capacity of the material) [40]. The initial coulombic efficiency of the material is 68.2%, and the lost capacity can still be attributed to the generation of the SEI layer and the insertion of Li+ into the irreversible site.
After 2, 3, 10, 100, and 200 cycles, the reversible capacities of TiO2@Fe2O3 anode material are 395.6, 381.0, 386.1, 455.2, and 591.9 mAh g−1, which are much larger than those of anatase TiO2 anode material (146.5, 141.4, 160.1, 159.1, and 185.4 mAh g−1). It is interesting to note that the reversible capacity of the TiO2@Fe2O3 material at the 200th cycle is increased by 219.3% compared with TiO2 and is much higher than its own theoretical specific capacity of 335.2 mAh g−1. According to the results of the previous EDS analysis, the mass of coated Fe2O3 in TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres only accounts for 7.05% of the total mass, and the coating of such a small amount of Fe2O3 brings a significant increase in the reversible capacity of the material, implying a good synergistic effect of TiO2 and Fe2O3 as anode materials. The reversible capacity of both anatase TiO2 and TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres is enhanced after a large number of cycles, which is a phenomenon commonly found in transition metal oxides. This may be due to the structural changes induced in the anode material when lithium-ions are continuously inserted/extracted, i.e., further activation of the material [7,40,41]. It is noteworthy that the reversible capacity of TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material at the 200th cycle increased by 49.62% compared with the 2nd cycle, which is significantly higher than that of TiO2 by 26.81%. The reason may be that the TiO2@Fe2O3 generates new interfaces after the coating of Fe2O3, which reduces the activation energy of this material. With the continuous insertion/extraction of lithium-ions, the structure of the active material is more likely to change, resulting in the formation of more new effective lithium storage sites within the material during the cycling process, which leads to an increase in specific capacity. This finding is also supported by the results in Figure 7 below.
To further exhibit the cycling performance as well as the rate capabilities of the materials, we prepared half-cells with anatase TiO2 microspheres, TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, commercial graphite, and α-Fe2O3 calcined at 600 °C as the anode material (working electrode), and performed cyclic charge/discharge tests at a current density of 2 C; their discharge specific capacities are shown as the purple, red, green, and brown curves in Figure 7, respectively. The discharge-specific capacities of anatase TiO2 and TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres after 500 cycles are 91.6 and 273.9 mAh g−1 at a current density of 2 C, respectively, indicating that the TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material with Fe2O3 coating exhibits a significant increase in the specific capacity after a large number of cycles, and this result is consistent with the findings demonstrated in Figure 6b. In addition, after 500 cycles, the coulombic efficiency of the TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere reaches 99.4%, indicating that the material has good reversibility of charge and discharge [42]. The discharge-specific capacity of the commercial graphite anode stabilizes from the 10th cycle until the 132nd cycle when it begins to decrease gradually, and the discharge-specific capacity is only 167.1 mAh g−1 after 500 cycles, which indicates that the TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material has superior cycling consistency and specific capacity compared with commercial graphite. The discharge-specific capacity of the hematite Fe2O3 anode material has been decaying with cycling and is only 98.1 mAh g−1 after 500 cycles, which indicates that employing TiO2 as the core of the TiO2@Fe2O3 anode material can significantly improve the cycling consistency of this material (the nanoscale structure of Fe2O3 on the surface of the microsphere also plays an important role). The above results demonstrate that in the TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material, TiO2 as the inner core maintains the structural stability of the material when Li-ions are inserted/extracted, while Fe2O3 as the outer shell can effectively enhance the specific capacity of the material. We are trying to explain the essential reasons for the synergistic effect of the two materials through computer simulations, which are in progress.
Figure 8 exhibits the rate performance of anatase TiO2 microspheres, TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, commercial graphite, and the calcined α-Fe2O3 at 600 °C. At current densities of 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 mA g−1, the reversible capacities of the anatase TiO2 anode materials are 73.8, 57, 41.3, 31, and 24.7 mAh g−1, respectively; the reversible capacities of the TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode materials are 394.4, 339.9, 288.2, 220.1, and 126.1 mAh g−1, respectively; the reversible capacities of the commercial graphite are 317.0, 284.9, 251.9, 190.6, and 95.7 mAh g−1; and the reversible capacities of αFe2O3 anode materials are 818.8, 378.6, 255.9, 172.5, and 125.6 mAh g−1, respectively. The reversible capacities of TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode materials at different current densities are significantly larger than those of TiO2 and commercial graphite anode materials, indicating that TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material has the potential for the application. For the calcined α-Fe2O3 anode material, the specific capacity decays at different current densities due to the absence of a solid TiO2 core to support the structure, and this finding is consistent with the results presented in Figure 7. At the end of the test at the current density of 1600 mA g−1, the four materials are then cycled at a current density of 100 mA g−1. From the results shown in Figure 8, it can be found that the specific capacities of the three materials—anatase TiO2 microspheres, TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, and commercial graphite—are not significantly different from those measured at 100 mA g−1 at the beginning of the rate performance test, suggesting that the charge-discharge cycles at high current density do not significantly damage the structural integrity of the three materials [43]. The above results show that the rate performance of the TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material is significantly improved after the coating of Fe2O3 compared with that of anatase TiO2, and we assume that this is because the Fe2O3 coating layer may improve the electronic conductivity of the material and enhance the lithium-ion diffusion rate in the material.
To further investigate the influence of the Fe2O3 coating layer on the electronic conductivity of the anode materials, we conducted EIS tests on anatase TiO2, TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere, and hematite Fe2O3, respectively, and the results are shown in Figure 9. The Nyquist plots of all three materials consist of a semicircle in the high- and medium-frequency region and a slant line in the low-frequency region. The half circle in the high- and medium-frequency region reflects the impedance of the material, which includes the internal resistance of the cell and the charge transfer impedance, the smaller the radius of the half circle, the smaller the impedance; the slope of the slant line in the low-frequency region reflects the lithium-ion diffusion rate in the anode material, and the greater the slope of the slant line, the faster the diffusion rate of Li-ions [44]. Based on the lithium-ion insertion/extraction mechanism in the anode material, the EIS profile can be fitted based on an equivalent circuit (inset in Figure 9). R1 is the ohmic resistance (total resistance of the electrolyte, separator, and electrical contacts), R2 is the charge transfer resistance, Wo1 is the Warburg impedance of lithium-ion diffusion into the active materials, and CPE1 is the constant phase-angle element, which involves double layer capacitance [45]. The fitted results are shown in Table 1. The charge transfer impedances of anatase TiO2 microspheres, TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, and α-Fe2O3 anode materials are 238.35, 119.81, and 202.17 Ω, respectively, and these impedances reflect the conductivity of the three materials, among which, the conductivity of TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material is significantly higher than that of the other two materials and the results of DFT simulations later in the paper also confirm this finding. For the low-frequency region, the slope of the slant line of TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material is significantly larger than that of TiO2 as well as Fe2O3, and the slope of the slant line of Fe2O3 is larger than that of TiO2. This indicates that the lithium-ion diffusion rate is the highest in TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material, which is mainly attributed to the higher lithium-ion diffusion rate of Fe2O3 (1 × 10−14 to 1 × 10−11 cm2 s−1) [46] relative to TiO2 (1 × 10−15 to 1 × 10−9 cm2 s−1) [7] and the unique porous and core-shell structure of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres that shorten the diffusion distance of lithium-ions. The above results reveal that the electronic conductivity of TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material and the diffusion rate of lithium-ions inside it are significantly improved relative to anatase TiO2. It has been reported in the literature [25,47] that the increase in the electronic conductivity of the material and the diffusion rate of lithium-ions inside it can enhance the rate properties of the material, which is consistent with the results demonstrated in Figure 8.

3.5. First-Principles Calculations

Figure 9 demonstrates that the electronic conductivity of TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material is significantly greater than that of TiO2 and Fe2O3. To explain this finding and investigate further the synergistic effect of TiO2 and Fe2O3, we used density functional theory to calculate the electron density of states (DOS) of anatase TiO2, hematite Fe2O3, and TiO2@Fe2O3. Figure 10a depicts the crystal structure of anatase TiO2, which belongs to the tetragonal system and has structurally optimized lattice constants of a = b = 3.803 Å and c = 9.748 Å. Figure 10d illustrates the DOS map of anatase TiO2 with a forbidden bandwidth of 2.14 eV near the Fermi level, indicating that anatase TiO2 is a semiconductor with poor conductivity. As shown in Figure 10b, the crystal structure of hematite Fe2O3 is derived from its XRD test results, which belongs to the hexagonal system with a = b = 5.035 Å, c = 13.763 Å, α = β = 90°, γ = 120°. There is a band gap around 0.4 eV for the majority spin, and no band gap for the minority spin, suggesting the hematite Fe2O3 is a half-metal with slightly higher electrical conductivity than anatase TiO2. The high-energy crystal plane of TiO2 is the (101) plane, while the high-energy crystal plane of Fe2O3 is the (104) plane [48]. Therefore, we constructed the interface model of TiO2@Fe2O3 using the (101) plane of TiO2 and the (104) plane of Fe2O3, and the total number of atoms is 299, as depicted in Figure 10c. Figure 10f is the DOS map of TiO2@Fe2O3, whose spin-up and spin-down show metallicity near the Fermi level, indicating that TiO2@Fe2O3 is a good conductor, and its electronic conductivity is significantly higher than that of anatase TiO2 and hematite Fe2O3. This may be due to the formation of complex chemical bonds at the interface of TiO2 and Fe2O3, where some Ti atoms enter the lattice of Fe2O3, causing a change in the electron cloud state at the interface. The high electronic conductivity gives an enhancement to the rate performance of TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material, which is consistent with the experimental results in Figure 8.

4. Conclusions

In this study, TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material is prepared by the homogeneous precipitation method. The results of XRD and Raman spectroscopy indicate that the material consists of anatase TiO2 and hematite Fe2O3 (α-Fe2O3). SEM and EDS characterization showed that α-Fe2O3 is uniformly coated on the TiO2 surface, and the surface of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres is lychee-like, in addition, the monodispersity of the microspheres is good, and the α-Fe2O3 coating layer accounts for about 7.05% of the total mass. The BET results show that the TiO2@Fe2O3 anode material has a large number of mesopores and micropores on the surface with a specific surface area of 14.72 m2/g.
The small amount of Fe2O3 coating brings a substantial improvement to the electrochemical performance of TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material. After 200 cycles at a current density of 0.2 C, the specific capacity of TiO2@Fe2O3 anode material increases by 219.3% compared with anatase TiO2, reaching 591.5 mAh g−1. After 500 cycles at 2 C current density, the discharge-specific capacity of TiO2@Fe2O3 reaches 273.1 mAh g−1, which is higher than that of commercial graphite 167.9 mAh g−1 under the same test conditions. In addition, TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material outperforms commercial graphite in terms of cycling consistency as well as rate performance. The EIS results demonstrate that the electronic conductivity of the TiO2@Fe2O3 microsphere anode material is higher than that of anatase TiO2 and hematite Fe2O3, which is the primary reason for its improved rate performance, and it also suggests a synergistic effect between TiO2 and Fe2O3. From DFT calculations, the DOS of TiO2@Fe2O3 shows a metallic nature, revealing the essential reason for the high electronic conductivity of TiO2@Fe2O3. At present, the synergistic effect between TiO2 and Fe2O3 is under further study. This study presents a novel strategy for identifying suitable anode materials for commercial lithium-ion batteries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma16051945/s1, Figure S1: CV curves of hematite Fe2O3 at the scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in the range of 0.01~3.5 V.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C. and F.L.; methodology, Y.C., J.W., M.-C.R. and P.B.; software, F.L., J.W., H.W. and X.Z.; validation, Y.C., M.-C.R. and P.B.; formal analysis, Y.C.; investigation, F.L., M.D. and Y.Z.; resources, Y.C.; data curation, F.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C.; writing—review and editing, J.W., M.-C.R. and P.B.; visualization, F.L. and M.D.; supervision, Y.C., M.-C.R. and P.B.; project administration, Y.C., M.-C.R. and P.B.; funding acquisition, Y.C., M.-C.R. and P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (grant number 2020CFB408), Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Green Materials for Light Industry (grant number 201710A06), Hubei Province Key Research Foundation for Water Resources (grant number HBSLKY2023035) and the Open Fund of Hubei Longzhong Laboratory (grant number 2022ZZ-16).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ma, J.; Guo, X.; Yan, Y.; Xue, H.; Pang, H. FeOx-based materials for electrochemical energy storage. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yu, S.; Ng, V.M.H.; Wang, F.; Xiao, Z.; Li, C.; Kong, L.B.; Que, W.; Zhou, K. Synthesis and application of iron-based nanomaterials as anodes of lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 9332–9367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Balogun, M.S.; Wu, Z.; Luo, Y.; Qiu, W.; Fan, X.; Long, B.; Huang, M.; Liu, P.; Tong, Y. High power density nitridated hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanorods as anode for high-performance flexible lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 308, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zuniga, L.; Gonzalez, G.; Orrostieta Chavez, R.; Myers, J.C.; Lodge, T.P.; Alcoutlabi, M. Centrifugally spun α-Fe2O3/TiO2/carbon composite fibers as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Han, M.; Mu, Y.; Yuan, F.; Bai, X.; Yu, J. Vapor pressure-assisted synthesis of chemically bonded TiO2/C nanocomposites with highly mesoporous structure for lithium-ion battery anode with high capacity, ultralong cycling lifetime, and superior rate capability. J. Power Sources 2020, 465, 228206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhai, B.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Z. Facile synthesis of porous anatase TiO2 nanomaterials with the assistance of biomass resource for lithium ion batteries with high-rate performance. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2020, 145, 109552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, S.; Liu, J.; Qiu, S.; Wang, Y.; Yan, X.; Wu, N.; Wang, S.; Guo, Z. Enhancing electrochemical performances of TiO2 porous microspheres through hybridizing with FeTiO3 and nanocarbon. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 190, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yuan, L.; Song, K.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Yang, B.; Qiao, H.; Hu, X. Fe2O3 nanorods decorated with ultrafine CeO2 as binder-free cathode to improve the performance of LiO2 batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 368, 137645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, T.; Shen, Z.; Wu, Y.; Han, T.; Zhu, M.; Qiao, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J. A yolk–shell Fe3O4@void@carbon nanochain as shuttle effect suppressive and volume-change accommodating sulfur host for long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 7744–7750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, A.; Chen, J.; Zhou, W.; Wang, A.; Chen, M.; Tian, Q.; Xu, J. Electrodeposition of MnO2 nanoflakes onto carbon nanotube film towards high-performance flexible quasi-solid-state Zn-MnO2 batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 873, 114392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yan, X.; Han, Q.; Dong, C.; Sun, X.; You, D.; Jiang, F. Spherical-graphite/nano-Mn2O3 composites as advanced anode materials for lithium half/full batteries. J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 853, 157109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Weng, S.C.; Brahma, S.; Huang, P.C.; Huang, Y.C.; Lee, Y.H.; Chang, C.C.; Huang, J.L. Enhanced capacity and significant rate capability of Mn3O4/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as high performance anode material in lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 505, 144629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fu, W.; Liu, T.; Hou, S.; Guo, Y.; Mei, C.; Zhao, L. Engineering MnO/C microsphere for enhanced lithium storage. J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 861, 157961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, B.; Wang, F. Formation of dumbbell and sphere-like CuO as high-performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Mater. Lett. 2020, 261, 127058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, R.; Huang, X.; Lin, Y.; Cao, Y. NiO/carbon aerogel microspheres with plum-pudding structure as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Materials 2020, 13, 2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, D.; Wang, C.; Wu, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, F.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.Y.; Li, C.M. Synthesis of hollow Co3O4 nanocrystals in situ anchored on holey graphene for high rate lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 2020, 163, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qu, D.; Sun, Z.; Gan, S.; Gao, L.; Song, Z.; Kong, H.; Xu, J.; Dong, X.; Niu, L. Two-dimensional Fe2O3/TiO2 Composite Nanoplates with Improved Lithium Storage Properties as Anodic Materials for Lithium-Ion Full Cells. ChemElectroChem 2020, 7, 4963–4970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Irie, H.; Ohwaki, T. Nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide as visible-light-sensitive photocatalyst: Designs, developments, and prospects. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9824–9852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yao, M.; Wang, H.; Qian, R.; Yao, T.; Shi, J.W.; Cheng, Y. Robust hollow TiO2 spheres for lithium/sodium ion batteries with excellent cycling stability and rate capability. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 5024–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, S.; Kang, D. Enhanced electrochemical performance via using interconnected TiO2 nanofibers to inhibit the shuttle effect. Ionics 2021, 27, 2073–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, X.; Luo, F.; Tian, Q.; Zhang, W.; Sui, Z.; Chen, J. Anatase TiO2 nanowires intertangled with CNT for conductive additive-free lithium-ion battery anodes. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2021, 153, 110037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luo, J.; Xia, X.; Luo, Y.; Guan, C.; Liu, J.; Qi, X.; Ng, C.F.; Yu, T.; Zhang, H.; Fan, H.J. Rationally designed hierarchical TiO2@Fe2O3 hollow nanostructures for improved lithium ion storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 737–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, H.; Wang, W.; Yu, G.; Qin, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ren, L.; Chen, J. Nitrogen-doped carbon-coated TiO2/TiF3 heterostructure nanoboxes with enhanced lithium and sodium storage performance. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 4738–4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tian, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, W.; Sui, Z.; Yang, L. Hierarchical carbon-riveted 2D@0D TiO2 nanosheets@SnO2 nanoparticles composite for a improved lithium-ion battery anode. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 511, 145625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, Y.; Wei, Q.; Wang, X.; Shu, H.; Yang, X.; Sun, S. Porous hollow α-Fe2O3@TiO2 core–shell nanospheres for superior lithium/sodium storage capability. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 13807–13818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guan, S.; Fan, Q.; Shen, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Shi, Z. Heterojunction TiO2@TiOF2 nanosheets as superior anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 5720–5729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, H.; Guo, P.; Zhou, T.; Wu, X.; Zeng, M. Investigation of TiO2 surface-coating modification of MgCo2O4 nanorods anode material. Mater. Lett. 2021, 282, 128681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, G.; Cao, S.; Fu, L.; Wan, S.; Liu, Q. A two-step hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2/C/FeS2 composite as high performance anode for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 386, 138470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Du, Z.; Xiao, J.; Cen, W.; Yuan, S. Polypyrrole-encapsulated Fe2O3 nanotube arrays on a carbon cloth support: Achieving synergistic effect for enhanced supercapacitor performance. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 386, 138486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, J.; Wu, Q.; Yang, X.; He, S.; Khan, J.; Meng, Y.; Zhu, X.; Tong, S.; Wu, M. Chestnut-like TiO2@α-Fe2O3 core–shell nanostructures with abundant interfaces for efficient and ultralong life lithium-ion storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, Y.; Liang, J.; Tian, Q.; Zhang, W.; Sui, Z. Facile construction of clustered Fe2O3/TiO2 composite for improved lithium storage performance. Synth. Met. 2020, 263, 116353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, Y.; He, P.; Wei, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Wu, C.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, H.; Kowalska, E.; Dong, S. Three-dimensional monodispersed TiO2 microsphere network formed by a sub-zero sol-gel method. Mater. Lett. 2020, 268, 127592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Perdew, J.P.; Wang, Y. Accurate and simple density functional for the electronic exchange energy: Generalized gradient approximation. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8800–8802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Burke, K.; Perdew, J.P.; Wang, Y. Derivation of a Generalized Gradient Approximation: The PW91 Density Functional. In Electronic Density Functional Theory; Dobson, J.F., Vigale, G., Das, M.M., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  37. Perdew, J.P.; Wang, Y. Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Wei, M. Hierarchical porous anatase TiO2 microspheres with high-rate and long-term cycling stability for sodium storage in ether-based electrolyte. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 3619–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Paul, S.; Rahman, M.A.; Sharif, S.B.; Kim, J.H.; Siddiqui, S.E.T.; Hossain, M.A.M. TiO2 as an Anode of high-performance lithium-ion batteries: A Comprehensive Review towards Practical Application. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Z.; Hu, X.; Shi, Z.; Lu, J.; Wang, Z. MOFs-derived metal oxides inlayed in carbon nanofibers as anode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 531, 147290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hou, S.; Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Pang, F.; Liu, M.; Luo, Y.; Zhuang, L.; Zhao, L. Podocarpus-like α-Fe2O3/TiO2 composite with balsam pear texture for enhanced lithium storage. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 476, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, X.; Chen, H.; Xie, Y.; Guo, J. Ultralong life lithium-ion battery anode with superior high-rate capability and excellent cyclic stability from mesoporous Fe2O3@TiO2 core–shell nanorods. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 3912–3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gu, X.; Chen, L.; Ju, Z.; Xu, H.; Yang, J.; Qian, Y. Controlled growth of porous α-Fe2O3 branches on β-MnO2 nanorods for excellent performance in lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 4049–4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qin, G.; Zeng, M.; Wu, X.; Wen, J.; Li, J. Fabrication of Fe2O3@TiO2 core–shell nanospheres as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 12944–12950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pian, C.; Peng, W.; Ren, H.; Ma, C.; Su, Y.; Ti, R.; Chen, X.; Zhu, L.; Liu, J.; Sun, X.; et al. Robust α-Fe2O3@TiO2 Core–Shell Structures with Tunable Buffer Chambers for High-Performance Lithium Storage. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 866369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yao, J.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xiao, S.; Yang, J. Interconnected α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles prepared from leaching liquor of tin ore tailings as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 855, 157288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xiao, S.; Li, X.; Li, T.; Xiang, Y.; Chen, J.S. Practical strategies for enhanced performance of anode materials in Na+/K+-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 7317–7335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, J.; Ng, K.Y.S.; Deng, D. Micro single crystals of hematite with nearly 100% exposed {104} facets: Preferred etching and lithium storage. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 2811–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 01945 g001 550
Figure 1. Preparation schematic of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres.
Figure 1. Preparation schematic of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres.
Materials 16 01945 g001
Materials 16 01945 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of (a) TiO2 after 600 °C calcination, (b) TiO2@Fe(OH)3 prepared by water bath, (c) TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, (d) Raman spectra of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of (a) TiO2 after 600 °C calcination, (b) TiO2@Fe(OH)3 prepared by water bath, (c) TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, (d) Raman spectra of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres.
Materials 16 01945 g002
Materials 16 01945 g003 550
Figure 3. FE-SEM images of the (a,b) homemade TiO2, (c,d) TiO2 after calcination at 600 °C, (e,f) TiO2@Fe(OH)3 prepared by water bath, and (g,h) calcined TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres; (i,j) the EDS spectrum and (k–m) mapping images of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres. The magnification of (a,c,e,g,i) is 60 k, and that of (b,d,f,h) is 20 k.
Figure 3. FE-SEM images of the (a,b) homemade TiO2, (c,d) TiO2 after calcination at 600 °C, (e,f) TiO2@Fe(OH)3 prepared by water bath, and (g,h) calcined TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres; (i,j) the EDS spectrum and (k–m) mapping images of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres. The magnification of (a,c,e,g,i) is 60 k, and that of (b,d,f,h) is 20 k.
Materials 16 01945 g003
Materials 16 01945 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) N2 adsorption (purple)—desorption (red) isotherms and (b) pore size distribution curves of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres.
Figure 4. (a) N2 adsorption (purple)—desorption (red) isotherms and (b) pore size distribution curves of TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres.
Materials 16 01945 g004
Materials 16 01945 g005 550
Figure 5. CV curves of (a) anatase TiO2 and (b) TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres in the potential window of 0.01~3.5 V with a scanning rate of 0.1 mV·s−1.
Figure 5. CV curves of (a) anatase TiO2 and (b) TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres in the potential window of 0.01~3.5 V with a scanning rate of 0.1 mV·s−1.
Materials 16 01945 g005
Materials 16 01945 g006 550
Figure 6. Galvanostatic discharge/charge curves of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 10th, 100th, and 200th cycles for (a) anatase TiO2 and (b) TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres in the voltage range of 0.01~3.0 V at 0.2 C current density.
Figure 6. Galvanostatic discharge/charge curves of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 10th, 100th, and 200th cycles for (a) anatase TiO2 and (b) TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres in the voltage range of 0.01~3.0 V at 0.2 C current density.
Materials 16 01945 g006
Materials 16 01945 g007 550
Figure 7. Cycling performances of anatase TiO2, TiO2@Fe2O3, hematite Fe2O3, commercial graphite and coulombic efficiency of TiO2@Fe2O3 in the voltage range of 0.01~3.0 V at 2 C current density.
Figure 7. Cycling performances of anatase TiO2, TiO2@Fe2O3, hematite Fe2O3, commercial graphite and coulombic efficiency of TiO2@Fe2O3 in the voltage range of 0.01~3.0 V at 2 C current density.
Materials 16 01945 g007
Materials 16 01945 g008 550
Figure 8. Rate capability tests of anatase TiO2, TiO2@Fe2O3, hematite Fe2O3, and commercial graphite at rates of 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, and 100 mA g−1 in sequence.
Figure 8. Rate capability tests of anatase TiO2, TiO2@Fe2O3, hematite Fe2O3, and commercial graphite at rates of 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, and 100 mA g−1 in sequence.
Materials 16 01945 g008
Materials 16 01945 g009 550
Figure 9. Nyquist plots of anatase TiO2, TiO2@Fe2O3, and hematite Fe2O3 in the frequency range from 0.01 to 1 × 106 Hz. The inset is the corresponding equivalent circuit.
Figure 9. Nyquist plots of anatase TiO2, TiO2@Fe2O3, and hematite Fe2O3 in the frequency range from 0.01 to 1 × 106 Hz. The inset is the corresponding equivalent circuit.
Materials 16 01945 g009
Materials 16 01945 g010 550
Figure 10. Optimized structures of (a) anatase TiO2, (b) hematite Fe2O3, and (c) TiO2@Fe2O3; corresponding electron density of states (DOS) of (d) anatase TiO2, (e) hematite Fe2O3, and (f) TiO2@Fe2O3.
Figure 10. Optimized structures of (a) anatase TiO2, (b) hematite Fe2O3, and (c) TiO2@Fe2O3; corresponding electron density of states (DOS) of (d) anatase TiO2, (e) hematite Fe2O3, and (f) TiO2@Fe2O3.
Materials 16 01945 g010
Table
Table 1. R1 (ohmic resistance) and R2 (charge transfer impedance) values obtained from equivalent circuit fitting for anatase TiO2, TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, and hematite Fe2O3 materials in LIBs.
Table 1. R1 (ohmic resistance) and R2 (charge transfer impedance) values obtained from equivalent circuit fitting for anatase TiO2, TiO2@Fe2O3 microspheres, and hematite Fe2O3 materials in LIBs.
MaterialsR1R2
TiO22.29238.35
TiO2@Fe2O32.08119.81
Fe2O34.03202.17
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Ding, M.; Wang, J.; Zheng, X.; Wang, H.; Record, M.-C.; Boulet, P. Lychee-like TiO2@Fe2O3 Core-Shell Nanostructures with Improved Lithium Storage Properties as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Materials 2023, 16, 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051945

AMA Style

Chen Y, Liu F, Zhao Y, Ding M, Wang J, Zheng X, Wang H, Record M-C, Boulet P. Lychee-like TiO2@Fe2O3 Core-Shell Nanostructures with Improved Lithium Storage Properties as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Materials. 2023; 16(5):1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051945

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yuan, Feihong Liu, Yufei Zhao, Mengdie Ding, Juan Wang, Xuan Zheng, Huihu Wang, Marie-Christine Record, and Pascal Boulet. 2023. "Lychee-like TiO2@Fe2O3 Core-Shell Nanostructures with Improved Lithium Storage Properties as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries" Materials 16, no. 5: 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051945

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop