Next Article in Journal
Nanocomposites as Substituent of Cement: Structure and Mechanical Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Process Parameters on the Microstructure and Properties of Cu–Cr–Nb–Ti Alloy Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Marine Atmospheric Corrosion on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of 7075 High-Strength Aluminum Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation into the Microstructure and Hardness of Additively Manufactured (3D-Printed) Inconel 718 Alloy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Assessment of Ferritic ODS Steels Obtained by Laser Additive Manufacturing

Materials 2023, 16(6), 2397; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062397
by Lucas Autones 1, Pascal Aubry 2, Joel Ribis 1, Hadrien Leguy 1, Alexandre Legris 3 and Yann de Carlan 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Materials 2023, 16(6), 2397; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062397
Submission received: 14 February 2023 / Revised: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 13 March 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing of Metallic Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled “materials-2250111-Laser AM” dealing with laser additive manufacturing has been reviewed. The paper has been nicely written but needs significant improvement. Please follow my comments.

 

 

1.     What is the main research question for this research work?

2.     Please check the chemical composition in Table 1.

3.     What is the future direction of this work?

4.     How did you select the parameters?

5.     Please update the introduction with the new publications in the field. Authors are encouraged to read and add the following two new papers in the field.

·       Microstructure simulation and experimental evaluation of the anisotropy of 316 L stainless steel manufactured by laser powder bed fusion

·       Process-dependent anisotropic thermal conductivity of laser powder bed fusion AlSi10Mg: impact of microstructure and aluminum-silicon interfaces

6.     Please proofread the paper.

7.     Add more discussion about “Figure 12. STEM EDX maps of the SLM sample”.

8.     Additive manufacturing has many advantages over the conventional manufacturing method which can be highlighted in your paper. Please read the following manuscript and add it to the literature to show how additive manufacturing is comparable with conventional manufacturing.

 

·       Laser subtractive and laser powder bed fusion of metals: review of process and production features

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

well done

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper is well presented and contains original results. However, authors are encouraged to improve their work based on the following comments:

 

1) The novelty of this work must be more explained.

2) The applications of this work should be more discussed.

3) For general readers, authors are encouraged to discuss other kind of works such as: [(a) “Microstructural/geometric imperfection sensitivity on the vibration response of geometrically discontinuous bi-directional functionally graded plates (2D-FGPs) with partial supports by using FEM”, Steel and Composite Structures, 45(5), 621-640.; (b) “Combined influence of porosity and elastic foundation parameters on the bending behavior of advanced sandwich structures”, Steel and Composite Structures, 46(1), 1-13.].

 

4) In conclusion, give only main findings of your research with an appropriate value.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop