Next Article in Journal
Reliability Study of Magnesium Oxychloride-Coated Reinforced Concrete Based on Gumbel Distribution
Previous Article in Journal
Reduced Graphene Oxide Aerogels Cartridges for Solid Phase Extraction of Benzotriazoles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical Properties under Compression and Microscopy Analysis of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete

1
School of Urban Construction, Wuchang University of Technology, Wuhan 430223, China
2
School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
3
Kaifeng Development and Reform Commission, Kaifeng 475000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(6), 2520; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062520
Submission received: 2 January 2023 / Revised: 10 March 2023 / Accepted: 19 March 2023 / Published: 22 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)

Abstract

:
In this study, the basalt fiber content (0%, 0.075%, and 0.15%) and replacement ratio of recycled coarse aggregate (0%, 50%, and 100%) were used as parameters, and the compressive strength of 15 cubes and 15 prisms was analyzed. The failure morphology of the specimens was characterized, and the cubic compressive strength, axial compressive strength, elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and other mechanical property indices of the specimens were measured. Upon increasing the replacement ratio, the degree of damage of the specimens gradually increased, whereas the cubic compressive strength, axial compressive strength, and elastic modulus gradually decreased. As the replacement ratio was increased from 50% to 100%, the cubic compressive strength and elastic modulus were noted to decrease the most by about 9.07% and 9.87%, respectively. On the other hand, the Poisson’s ratio first decreased, followed by an increase. Upon increasing the fiber content, the degree of damage of the specimens was gradually reduced, whereas the cubic compressive strength, axial compressive strength, and elastic modulus gradually increased. As the fiber content increased from 0.075% to 0.15%, the axial compressive strength and elastic modulus increased the most by about 6.65% and 10.19%, respectively. On the other hand, the Poisson’s ratio gradually decreased. Based on the test data, the functional relationships between the strength indices and different variables, as well as the conversion value of each strength index and different variables were established; after comparison and verification, the formula calculation results were found to be in good agreement with the test results. The microstructural changes in the basalt fiber reinforced recycled aggregate concrete were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the changes in the mechanical properties of the basalt fiber reinforced recycled aggregate concrete as well as the mechanism of fiber modification and reinforcement were explained from a micro perspective.

1. Introduction

With the acceleration of urbanization, an increasing number of buildings have been demolished, thus resulting in a large amount of construction waste. Simultaneously, the construction of new buildings requires the use of a large amount of natural resources and construction materials. The large resource consumption inevitably causes a significant damage to the environment. Thus, it is of vital concern to effectively deal with waste concrete [1,2,3,4]. Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) is a new material made up of waste concrete after mechanical or artificial crushing, screening, grading, and other processes, in accordance with the designed proportion attained by partially or completely replacing the natural coarse aggregate (NCA) [5,6,7,8]. Because of the original damage or micro-cracks in the aggregate crushing process [9,10], the bearing capacity of RAC is lower compared with the natural aggregate concrete [11]. The disadvantages of high porosity [12,13], strong water absorption [14], and low aggregate strength [15,16] further affect the development of the RAC technology.
Basalt fiber (BF) represents a green concrete reinforcing material. Compared with the glass fiber [17,18], steel fiber [19,20,21], recycled fiber [22,23], and other materials, BF has relatively stable chemical properties, thermal stability, mechanical properties [24,25], and cost effectiveness. The addition of a certain amount of BF imparts BFRRAC superior mechanical properties [26,27]. Zhang et al. [28] studied the influence of BF content on BFRRAC under different RAC strength grades. It was observed that the optimal fiber content for different strength grades of BFRRAC was different, and the BF content increased with the concrete strength grade. The optimal fiber volume content of C25, C35, and C45 was 0.1%, 0.1–0.15% and 0.15%, respectively. Furthermore, the bonding force between the concrete and fiber increased with the concrete strength grade. Ahmadi et al. [29] studied the use of recycled steel fibers by 0.5% to 1%, and the results showed that adding fibers by 0.5% increased the compressive strength to 10% at the highest value. However, adding fibers by 1% reduced the compressive strength by 12% at the maximum amount. Sun et al. [30] studied the mechanical properties of BFRRAC as a function of fiber content. Upon increasing the fiber content, the compressive strength of the concrete material first increased, followed by a decrease, while the bending strength increased gradually. As the fiber content increased from 0 to 3%, the compressive strength increased the most by about 24.4%, and as the fiber content increased from 0 to 5%, the bending strength increased the most by about 28.2%. Katkhuda and Shatarat [31] and Jiang et al. [32] studied the reinforcing effect of BF on the mechanical properties of RAC as a function of BF content. BF was noted to result in a small increase in compressive strength, along with a significant increment in the transverse and splitting tensile strength. Dong et al. [33] studied the effect of BF on the RAC property. The use of BF improved the concrete strength of the mixtures, and an optimal fiber content in each concrete formulation provided a high strength value, but the maximum decreased by 55.6% and 32.3% in the splitting tensile strength and the flexural strength, respectively. Wang et al. [34] demonstrated that at a BF content of 1 kg/m3 and 2 kg/m3, upon increasing of the recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) replacement ratio, the axial compressive strength first increased followed by a decrease. Furthermore, the maximum axial compressive strength was obtained as the RCA replacement ratio was 50%. Fang et al. [35] reported that an optimal BF content effectively improved the flexural, splitting tensile, and compressive strength of RAC; however, the excess BF amount led to the formation of agglomerates, thus weakening the mechanical properties of RAC. Compared with the BF fiber content of 0%, when the BF volume fraction was 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.2%, the cube compressive strengths decreased by 9.9%, 1.0% and 10.6%, respectively. The axial compressive strengths decreased by 3.0%, 5.2%, and 1.7%, respectively. Dilbas and Cakir [36] observed that the physical properties of RAC decreased significantly upon increasing the BF content and RAC replacement ratio, and the effect of BF content on the physical properties was less than the replacement ratio of RAC. At the same time, the incorporation of BF significantly improved the mechanical properties of RAC.
Overall, the literature studies show that the mechanical properties of RAC can be improved by fiber modification. However, only a handful of studies have simultaneously focused on the BFRRAC mechanical properties and microstructure, and only failure modes and test results have been described in most studies and calculation formulas for BFRRAC are rarely proposed. This study aims to close the gap in the literature while providing important outcomes about BFRRAC regarding mechanical properties, and to propose a constitutive relationship suitable for BFRRAC. For this purpose, the mechanical properties of RAC have been studied with BF content and RCA replacement ratio as the variables. At the same time, the characteristics of BFRRAC have been analyzed by SEM after compression failure. The functional relationships between the strength indices and different variables, as well as the conversion value of each strength index and different variables have been established, which provides reference for further research and applications of BFRRAC.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Materials

The following materials were used to fabricate the BFRRAC specimens: cement, natural coarse aggregate, recycled coarse aggregate, natural fine aggregate, BF, high-performance polycarboxylic acid superplasticizer, and tap water. Among these, P·O 42.5 Ordinary Portland Cement was selected, and the quality indexes are shown in Table 1. The NCA was natural continuously graded gravel, with a particle size range of 5~31.5 mm. RCA was obtained by artificial crushing, grading, screening, and drying of the wasted reinforced concrete beam from the structural hall of Henan Polytechnic University, with a particle size range 5~31.5 mm, and the design strength grade of original concrete was C25. The coarse aggregates are shown in Figure 1a,b, respectively, and their basic physical properties are shown in Table 2. Natural yellow sand was selected as the fine aggregate. Its bulk and apparent density values were 1750 kg/m3 and 2300 kg/m3, respectively, and the fineness modulus range was 1.6~2.2. Grade II fly ash produced by a power plant in Gongyi City was used in this study. The basalt fibers are shown in Figure 2, and their quality indices are shown in Table 3.

2.2. Design of Mixture Proportions

The RCA replacement ratios were selected to be 0%, 50%, and 100% (weight percentage of RCA to total coarse aggregate), and the BF content was varied as 0 kg/m3, 2 kg/m3, and 4 kg/m3 (the corresponding volume content was 0%, 0.075%, and 0.15%, respectively). The design of mixture proportions is presented in Table 4. The slump of BFRRAC mixture was measured in the range 130~160 mm, as shown in Figure 3.

2.3. Loading and Characterization of Specimens

An electro-hydraulic servo pressure testing machine (WAW-2000) with a maximum test force of 5000 kN was used. The cubic and axial compressive strength tests were carried out per “Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties” (China, GB/T50081-2019) [37], with a loading rate of 0.5 MPa/s. The BF content and replacement ratio of RCA were used as the variables. Fifteen cubes with dimensions of 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm were fabricated for the cubic compressive strength test, whereas 15 prisms of dimensions 150 mm × 150 mm × 300 mm were fabricated for the axial compression, elastic modulus, and Poisson’s ratio tests.
The test loading method of elastic modulus is shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The loading rate of the elastic modulus was 0.5 MPa/s, the reference load value F0 was 0.5 MPa, and the maximum preload value Fa was 1/3 of the axial compressive strength of the specimen. After the preload was centered, three repeated preloadings were performed between F0 and Fa. When loading to F0 and Fa, the dead load was 60 s, and the deformation value of each measuring point was recorded, and then the elastic modulus was calculated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Failure Process and Morphology

3.1.1. Cubic Compression Failure

The cubic compression failure process of BFRRAC specimens was roughly similar to that of the ordinary concrete specimens. At the initial stages of specimen loading, the specimen mainly resisted the increase in the external load by the overall elastic deformation, and the surface had no obvious change. As the load was increased gradually, cracks began to appear in the stress concentration area inside the specimen. Subsequently, the original micro-cracks of the RCA began to develop and increase. As the load continued to increase, the crackling sound of the colloidal cracking appeared, with the expansion of the internal cracks of the specimen. As a result, several vertical cracks appeared in the middle of the side in the direction 45~60°, and the surface of the BFRRAC began to bulge and peel. Upon reaching the ultimate load value, the specimen was eventually destroyed, and the cubic compression of the BFRRAC specimen exhibited a quadrangular pyramid failure morphology, as shown in Figure 6. As can be observed, the failure morphology of the specimens was dependent on the replacement ratio and BF content. At a same BF content, upon increasing the RCA replacement ratio, the number of cracks gradually decreased; however, the width became large. Furthermore, the degree of brittle failure of the specimens became more obvious. Keeping the RCA replacement ratio constant, upon increasing the BF content, a large number of unpenetrated fine cracks were observed after the failure of the specimen. Although the specimen was cracked; however, it did not scatter into fragments. The upper and lower parts of the specimen were noted to be basically intact, whereas the middle phase exhibited the presence of defects. Thus, increasing the BF content was noted to significantly improve the brittleness of BFRRAC.

3.1.2. Axial Compression Failure

At the initial stages of specimen loading, the surface of the BFRRAC prism did not exhibit any obvious change. As the load increased gradually, the specimen expanded laterally, and the original micro-cracks existing in the RCA began to develop. Furthermore, the micro-cracks between the new/old mortar and RCA began to expand upon increasing the load. BF distributed randomly inside the specimen could alleviate the stress concentration at the crack tip, thus preventing the crack propagation to a certain extent and balancing the internal force. As a result, the generation and development of cracks tended to be relatively stable. As the load continued to increase, the width and number of cracks increased sharply. The shear stress in the 45° direction reached the limit value, and the specimen exhibited the shear slip failure along the oblique section. A fraction of concrete fell off, and the internal aggregate was exposed, thus the bearing capacity was reduced. At this stage, the cracks were unstable and exhibited a sustainable development without increasing the external load. Afterwards, upon increasing the external load, the bonding between the cement mortar at the main crack, aggregate, and BF was lost, and the friction bite force on the slip surface was basically exhausted. Finally, the specimen completely lost its bearing capacity. The morphology of the axial compression of the BFRRAC specimen is shown in Figure 7. As can be observed, the integrity of each specimen was superior after failure. Chen et al. [38] also proposed that BF fiber has a significant toughening effect, the integrity of the specimen is good after failure, and only a small number of particles fall off. Furthermore, mortar loss was observed on the surface of a few specimens, and the surface of the peeled BFRRAC was irregular.

3.2. Test Result

The compression property indices of BFRRAC are shown in Table 5. It can be observed that the cubic and axial compressive strength decreased upon increasing the replacement ratio, whereas these were observed to increase with the BF content.

3.3. Analysis of Influencing Factors

3.3.1. Compressive Strength

The cubic and axial compressive strength of BFRRAC as a function of different variables are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. Compared with the benchmark specimen with 50% RCA replacement ratio and 2 kg/m3 BF content, at a BF content of 2 kg/m3 with the RCA replacement ratios changed to 0% and 100%, the cubic compressive strength increased by 4.14% and decreased by 9.07%, respectively, whereas the axial compressive strength increased by 14.96% and decreased by 10.80%, respectively. Wang et al. [39] and Zheng et al. [40] also proposed that the addition of an appropriate amount of basalt fiber could improve the compressive strength of RAC. The observed phenomenon was mainly due to a large number of micro-cracks inside RCA after crushing and the old mortar attached to the RCA surface. The original damage accumulated upon increasing the replacement ratio, which was reflected by a decline in strength. At an RCA replacement ratio of 50%, the BF content changed to 0 kg/m3 and 4 kg/m3, and the cubic compressive strength decreased by 4.34% and increased by 2.37%, respectively, whereas the axial compressive strength decreased by 3.32% and increased by 6.65%, respectively. The observed phenomenon was attributed to the loading process, which enhanced the axial deformation of the specimen and the bridging effect of BF effectively prevented the expansion of the cracks, thus the strength of the specimen was improved. In summary, the cubic and axial compressive strength of BFRRAC decreased upon increasing the RCA replacement ratio, whereas these exhibited an increase with BF content. Moreover, changing the RCA replacement ratio had a greater impact on the compressive strength of the specimens than the BF content.

3.3.2. The Functional Relationships between fcu, fc and Different Variables

Based on the measured values in Table 4, the compressive strength of the cubic specimens was subjected to dimension normalization and fitting, as shown in Figure 10. It can be seen that the dimensionless cubic compressive strength of BFRRAC showed a linear development trend with the RAC replacement ratio and BF content. Under the condition of a single parameter change (either replacement ratio or BF content), by using the least squares method, Equations (1) and (2), respectively, were obtained:
f cu , γ / f cu , a = 0.127 γ + 1.008                                                           R 2 = 0.96
f cu , λ / f cu , b = 0.018 λ + 1.003                                                             R 2 = 0.97
where the replacement ratio of RCA is represented by γ, the BF content is represented by λ, fcu,γ represents the cubic compressive strength values of BFRRAC with a BF content of 2 kg/m3 under different RCA replacement ratios, fcu,a represents the cubic compressive strength value of BFRRAC at a BF content of 2 kg/m3 and a RCA replacement ratio of 0%, fcu,λ represents the cubic compressive strength values of BFRRAC with a RCA replacement ratio of 50% under different BF contents, and fcu,b represents the cubic compressive strength of BFRRAC at a BF content of 0 kg/m3 and a RCA replacement ratio of 50%.
Based on the measured values in Table 4, the compressive strength of the prism specimens was subjected to dimension normalization and fitting, as shown in Figure 11. It can be seen that the dimensionless axial compressive strength of BFRRAC exhibited a linear development trend with the RAC replacement ratio and BF content. Under the condition of a single parameter change (either replacement ratio or BF content), by using the least squares method, Equations (3) and (4), respectively, were obtained:
f c , γ / f c , a = 0.224 γ + 0.994                                                             R 2 = 0.99
f c , λ / f c , b = 0.026 λ + 0.994                                                             R 2 = 0.96
where fc,γ represents the axial compressive strength values of BFRRAC at a BF content of 2 kg/m3 under different RCA replacement ratios, fc,a represents the axial compressive strength of BFRRAC at a BF content of 2 kg/m3 and a RCA replacement ratio of 0%, fc,λ represents the axial compressive strengths of BFRRAC at a RCA replacement ratio of 50% under different BF contents, and fc,b represents the axial compressive strength of BFRRAC at a BF content of 0 kg/m3 and a RCA replacement ratio of 50%.

3.3.3. fc/fcu

Because of the influence of the BF content and replacement ratio, the conversion relationship between the cubic and axial compressive strength of the ordinary concrete is no longer applicable to RAC. Therefore, the relation between the cubic and the axial compressive strength of the specimen was subjected to fitting, as shown in Figure 12. The functional relationships between the conversion value of each strength index and different variables were established, as shown in the Equations (5) and (6), respectively.
f c , γ / f cu , γ = 0.088 γ + 0.776                                                             R 2 = 0.86
f c , λ / f cu , λ = 0.005 λ 2 0.013 λ + 0.72                                                             R 2 = 1.00
where fc,γ and fcu,γ represent the axial and cubic compressive strength values of BFRRAC at a BF content of 2 kg/m3 BF under different RCA replacement ratios, fc,λ and fcu,λ represent the axial and the cubic compressive strength values of BFRRAC at an RCA replacement ratio of 50% under different BF contents.
To further verify the applicability of the calculation formula, the compressive strength of specimens under different BF contents [33,34,39,41,42] and different replacement ratios [33,34,39,41,42] were substituted into the formula calculation, the comparison between the fc/fcu test result and the calculation result based on Equations (5) and (6) is shown in Figure 13a,b, respectively. It can be observed that the formula calculation results were in good agreement with the test results.

3.3.4. Elastic Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio

The elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of BFRRAC as a function of different variables are shown in Figure 14 and Figure 15, respectively. Compared with the benchmark specimen with a 50% RCA replacement ratio and a BF content of 2 kg/m3, at a BF content of 2 kg/m3 with the RCA replacement ratios changed to 0% and 100%, the elastic modulus increased by 6.69% and decreased by 9.87%, respectively, whereas the Poisson’s ratio increased by 10% and 15%, respectively. At an RCA replacement ratio of 50% with the BF content changed to 0 kg/m3 and 4 kg/m3, the elastic modulus decreased by 7.01% and increased by 10.19%, respectively, whereas the Poisson’s ratio increased by 15% and decreased by 10%, respectively. In summary, upon increasing the RCA replacement ratio, the elastic modulus of BFRRAC decreased, whereas the Poisson’s ratio first decreased, followed by an increase. This was mainly due to a large number of micro-cracks inside RCA, thus it was easy to expand the crack during the test, and the density of concrete was reduced due to the adhesion of loose and porous old mortar outside RCA. Upon increasing the BF content, the elastic modulus of the prepared BFRRAC gradually increased, while the Poisson’s ratio was observed to decrease. The observed phenomenon was due to the reason that RCA adhered to the old mortar, which enhanced the friction force and mechanical bite force between the BF and mortar matrix. The distribution of BF in BFRRAC was disordered in three dimensions, which played a role in pulling the aggregate and preventing the crack propagation, thereby reducing the lateral deformation of the specimens and reducing the Poisson’s ratio. BF was noted to have an optimal compatibility with RAC. Upon incorporating a certain amount of BF, the compactness of the specimen and the continuity of the matrix increased, thus the impact of the original damage caused by crushing decreased, which enhanced the elastic modulus of the specimen.
The elastic modulus is a vital index reflecting the deformation ability of the materials. The elastic modulus of BFRRAC has been studied in many literature studies [36,41]. However, the mathematical expressions of the elastic modulus have been rarely proposed. Based on the “Code for design of concrete structures (China, GB 50010-2010)” [43], the calculation of the elastic modulus of the ordinary concrete was performed as per Equation (7).
E c c = 10 5 2.2 + 34.7 f cu
The measured data were substituted in Equation (7) to obtain the calculated elastic modulus (Ecc) of BFRRAC. The fitting curves of (Ec) and (Ecc) as a function of different parameters are shown in Figure 16. As can be observed, the calculation as per the “Code for design of concrete structures (China, GB/T50010-2010)” generally provided a greater Ecc value than Ec. Obviously, the current code was not applicable to the calculation of the elastic modulus of BFRRAC, and Ec/Ecc showed a linear increasing trend with the RAC replacement ratio and BF content. Under the condition of a single parameter change (either replacement ratio or BF content), by using the least squares method, Equations (8) and (9), respectively, were obtained:
E c , γ = 10 5 2.2 + 34.7 f cu ( 0.122 γ + 0.960   )                                                               R 2 = 0.99
E c , λ = 10 5 2.2 + 34.7 f cu ( 0.035 λ + 0.846     )                                                             R 2 = 0.98
where Ec,γ represents the calculated elastic modulus of BFRRAC with a BF content of 2 kg/m3 under different RCA replacement ratios, and Ec,λ represents the calculated elastic modulus of BFRRAC with an RCA replacement ratio 50% under different BF contents.
To further verify the applicability of the calculation formula, the specimen data under different BF contents [33,35,39,41] and different replacement ratios [28,41,44] were substituted into the formula calculation; the comparison between the test result and the formula calculation result of Ec based on Equations (8) and (9) is shown in Figure 17a and Figure 17b, respectively. It can be observed that the formula calculation results were in good agreement with the test results.

3.4. Analysis of Variance

The significance and primary and secondary order of the influence of each factor on the performance index were reflected by the analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, the influence relationship and law of each factor on the performance index were analyzed. In this study, the analysis was performed at a 5% level of significance to identify the statistically significant experimental parameters. For this, the data presented in Table 5 were examined by using the general linear model analysis of variance technique by means of software called “SPSS”. The cubic and axial compressive strength were assigned as dependent variables while the BF content and the replacement ratio of the recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) were selected as independent factors. The statistical analysis results are shown in Table 6. The p-values indicate the significance of the test parameter on the cubic and axial compressive strength. When the p-value was less than 5%, the parameter had a significant effect on the cubic and axial compressive strength. The contribution ratio represented the degree of response of each influencing factor to the dependent variable. According to the statistical analysis results, the contribution of the BF fiber content replacement ratio of the recycled coarse aggregate could be underestimated when compared with the contribution of the replacement ratio of the recycled coarse aggregate.

3.5. Microscopy Analysis of BFRRAC

The SEM analysis of BFRRAC is presented in Figure 18 (image magnification is represented by Mag, and the scale length is represented by the white lines).
As shown in Figure 18a, the micromorphology of the BFRRAC mortar matrix was mainly composed of the colloidal substances, such as the hydrated calcium silicate gel (C-S-H) of the flocculent, calcium hydroxide gel (CH) of the layered, and ettringite (AFt) of the needle columnar. The hydration products were noted to be tightly bound, which ensured that the specimen had superior mechanical properties. The hydration products appeared on the surface of fly ash, which gradually participated in the secondary hydration reaction. The fly ash also reacted with other basic hydroxides such as CH to produce C-S-H and other compounds with water-hardening cementitious properties, thus making the mortar matrix structure more compact with improved macroscopic mechanical properties.
The micromorphologies of the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between RCA or NCA and mortar matrix are shown in Figure 18b,c, respectively. Overall, the mortar matrix was noted to be dense. The bonding between NCA and mortar matrix was observed to be firm; however, a small number of micro-cracks were present between the RCA and mortar matrix. An obvious presence of ITZ was noted between the aggregate and mortar matrix, and the ITZ between the RCA and mortar matrix was observed to be weaker than that between the NCA and mortar matrix. The microcracks in RAC may have appeared due to the external forces as the recycled aggregate was broken. On the other hand, as the test was carried out, the cracks further expanded under the pressure. Similarly, the conclusion of Dong et al. [33] also proves that the ITZ is an important factor affecting the strength of RAC. Therefore, the mechanical properties of RAC were noted to be inferior compared with NAC.
As shown in Figure 18d,e, there was an obvious ITZ between the BF of the bridge cracks and mortar matrix after the concrete cracks. The mortar matrix was noted to be relatively dense, which indicates that BF had an optimal bridging effect in RAC. This is consistent with the results of Zheng et al. [40], when the fiber content was less than 0.2%, with the increase in fiber content, the mortar matrix became denser and denser. The toughening and crack resistance of BF could effectively prevent the development of cracks and improve the brittleness of the mortar matrix, thus optimizing the macroscopic mechanical properties of the specimen and improving the overall toughness. The morphology of BF being pulled out and failure indicate that BF not only prevented the development of the micro-cracks and cracks, but that is also bore a fraction of the stress, thus contributing towards the improvement of the macroscopic mechanical properties.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the basic mechanical properties of BFRRAC at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, along with discussing the influence of the RCA replacement ratio and BF content on the compressive failure morphology, strength, and deformation of BFRRAC. The main conclusions were as follows:
  • The morphology of the cubic specimens in each group under compression were noted to be similar, representing quadrangular pyramid failure. The BFRRAC prisms in each group represented typical oblique section shear failure, and the incorporation of BF enhanced the integrity of each specimen after failure.
  • The cubic and axial compressive strength of BFRRAC decreased upon increasing the RCA replacement ratio, whereas these increased with the BF content. As the replacement ratio was increased from 50% to 100%, the cubic compressive strength was noted to decrease the most, by about 9.07%. As the fiber content was increased from 2 kg/m3 to 4 kg/m3, the axial compressive strength increased the most, by about 6.65%. In addition, the influence of the RAC replacement ratio on the compressive strength of the specimens was noted to be greater than that of the BF content.
  • Upon increasing the RCA replacement ratio, the elastic modulus of BFRRAC decreased, whereas the Poisson’s ratio first decreased followed by an increase. As the replacement ratio was increased from 50% to 100%, the elastic modulus was noted to decrease the most, by about 9.87%. Upon increasing the BF content, the elastic modulus of BFRRAC increased, and the Poisson’s ratio decreased. As the fiber content was increased from 2 kg/m3 to 4 kg/m3, the elastic modulus increased the most by about 10.19%.
  • Based on the experiment data, the functional relationships between the strength indices and different variables as well as the conversion value of each strength index and different variables were established. In addition, by comparing the test data in the literature, the formula calculation results were in good agreement with the test results and could provide guidance for future applications in engineering.
  • The micromorphology of the mortar matrix and ITZ, as well as the modification mechanism of BF directly affected the macroscopic mechanical properties of RAC. The mechanical properties of RAC could be optimized by the bridging and crack resistance mechanism of BF.
  • Overall, this study carried out the mechanical properties test and microscopy analysis of BFRRAC, and established the relationship between different parameters and BFRRAC. In the future, we can continue to carry out in-depth research on this idea: Visualization of fiber distribution and pore structure distribution of RAC is studied by numerical simulation software and the three-dimensional microscopic analysis of dynamic and static mechanical properties of BFRRAC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.F.; Methodology, G.Z.; Software, P.X., L.F., X.K. and Y.F.; Investigation, G.Z., P.X., L.F., D.D. and X.K.; Resources, X.Z.; Data curation, X.Z. and D.D.; Funding acquisition, X.Z.; Writing – original draft, G.Z.; Writing—review & editing, P.X. and Y.F.; Visualization, D.D.; Supervision, X.K. and L.F.; Project administration, L.F.; Formal analysis, L.F., D.D. and X.K.; Resources, L.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Key R&D and Promotion Projects in Henan Province (212102310288), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (NSFRF200320).

Institutional Review Board Statement

We do not involve human research and do not require ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

We do not involve human research.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siempu, R.; Pancharathi, R.K. Pull-out behaviour of recycled aggregate based self compacting concrete. Comput. Concr. 2018, 21, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Colangelo, F.; Petrillo, A.; Cioffi, R.; Borrelli, C.; Forcina, A. Life cycle assessment of recycled concretes: A case study in southern Italy. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 1506–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Akhtar, A.; Sarmah, A.K. Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A global perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 186, 262–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liang, J.F.; Wang, E.; Zhou, X.; Le, Q.L. Influence of high temperature on mechanical properties of concrete containing recycled fine aggregate. Comput. Concr. 2018, 21, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, J.; Shi, Y.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, S. A BIM-Based construction and demolition waste information management system for greenhouse gas quantification and reduction. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 308–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, G.H.; Li, Q.Y.; Guo, Y.N.; Liu, H.B.; Zheng, S.D.; Chen, M.X. Study on the mechanical properties and durability of recycled aggregate concrete under the internal curing condition. Materials 2022, 15, 5914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liang, C.; Ma, H.; Pan, Y.; Ma, Z.; Duan, Z.; He, Z. Chloride permeability and the caused steel corrosion in the concrete with carbonated recycled aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 218, 506–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Elhakam, A.A.; Mohamed, A.E.; Awad, E. Influence of self-healing, mixing method and adding silica fume on mechanical properties of recycled aggregates concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 35, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shi, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Chong, L.; Xie, Z. Performance enhancement of recycled concrete aggregate—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tam, V.W.Y.; Soomro, M.; Evangelista, A.C.J. A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications (2000–2017). Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 172, 272–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, R.; Yu, N.; Li, Y. Methods for improving the microstructure of recycled concrete aggregate: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 242, 118164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Engelsen, C.J.; van der Sloot, H.A.; Petkovic, G. Long-term leaching from recycled concrete aggregates applied as sub-base material in road construction. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 587, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Behera, M.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Minocha, A.; Deoliya, R.; Maiti, S. Recycled aggregate from C&D waste & its use in concrete—A breakthrough towards sustainability in construction sector: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 68, 501–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Anike, E.E.; Saidani, M.; Ganjian, E.; Tyrer, M.; Olubanwo, A.O. Evaluation of conventional and equivalent mortar volume mix design methods for recycled aggregate concrete. Mater. Struct. 2020, 53, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bravo, M.; de Brito, J.; Pontes, J.; Evangelista, L. Mechanical performance of concrete made with aggregates from construction and demolition waste recycling plants. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 99, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Adesina, A. Performance of cementitious composites reinforced with chopped basalt fibres—An overview. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 266, 120970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mohajerani, A.; Vajna, J.; Cheung, T.H.H.; Kurmus, H.; Arulrajah, A.; Horpibulsuk, S. Practical recycling applications of crushed waste glass in construction materials: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 156, 443–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rashad, A.M. Recycled waste glass as fine aggregate replacement in cementitious materials based on Portland cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 72, 340–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Carneiro, J.A.; Lima, P.R.L.; Leite, M.B.; Filho, R.D.T. Compressive stress–strain behavior of steel fiber reinforced-recycled aggregate concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 46, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, Y.-C.; Zhang, J.-H.; Chen, G.-M.; Xie, Z.-H. Compressive behaviour of concrete structures incorporating recycled concrete aggregates, rubber crumb and reinforced with steel fibre, subjected to elevated temperatures. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 72, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jamshaid, H.; Mishra, R. A green material from rock: Basalt fiber—A review. J. Text. Inst. 2016, 107, 923–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Azevedo, A.R.; Marvila, M.T.; Zanelato, E.B.; Alexandre, J.; Xavier, G.C.; Cecchin, D. Development of mortar for laying and coating with pineapple fibers. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 2020, 24, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fayed, S.; Mansour, W. Evaluate the effect of steel, polypropylene and recycled plastic fibers on concrete properties. Adv. Concr. Constr. 2020, 10, 319–332. [Google Scholar]
  24. Skarżyński, L. Mechanical and radiation shielding properties of concrete reinforced with boron-basalt fibers using Digital Image Correlation and X-ray micro-computed tomography. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 255, 119252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ahmed, W.; Lim, C. Production of sustainable and structural fiber reinforced recycled aggregate concrete with improved fracture properties: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 279, 123832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liang, C.F.; Ma, H.W.; Pan, Y.Q.; Ma, Z.M.; Duan, Z.H.; He, Z.H. The evaluation of calcium carbonate added and basalt fiber reinforced roller compacted high performance concrete for pavement. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 17, e01293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, C.; Shi, F.; Cao, P.; Liu, K. The fracture toughness analysis on the basalt fiber reinforced asphalt concrete with prenotched three-point bending beam test. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e01079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, H.; Wang, B.; Xie, A.; Qi, Y. Experimental study on dynamic mechanical properties and constitutive model of basalt fiber reinforced concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 152, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahmadi, M.; Farzin, S.; Hassani, A.; Motamedi, M. Mechanical properties of the concrete containing recycled fibers and aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 144, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, X.; Gao, Z.; Cao, P.; Zhou, C. Mechanical properties tests and multiscale numerical simulations for basalt fiber reinforced concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 202, 58–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Katkhuda, H.; Shatarat, N. Improving the mechanical properties of recycled concrete aggregate using chopped basalt fibers and acid treatment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 140, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, C.; Fan, K.; Wu, F.; Chen, D. Experimental study on the mechanical properties and microstructure of chopped basalt fibre reinforced concrete. Mater. Des. 2014, 58, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dong, J.; Wang, Q.; Guan, Z. Material properties of basalt fibre reinforced concrete made with recycled earthquake waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 130, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; Hughes, P.; Niu, H.; Fan, Y. A new method to improve the properties of recycled aggregate concrete: Composite addition of basalt fiber and nano-silica. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fang, S.-E.; Hong, H.-S.; Zhang, P.-H. Mechanical Property Tests and Strength Formulas of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Materials 2018, 11, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Dilbas, H.; Çakır, O. Influence of basalt fiber on physical and mechanical properties of treated recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 254, 119216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. GB/T 50081-2019; Standard for Test Methods of Concrete Physical and Mechanical Properties. China Architecture and Building Press: Beijing, China, 2019. (In Chinese)
  38. Chen, A.; Han, X.; Chen, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Guo, T. Mechanical and stress-strain behavior of basalt fiber reinforced rubberized recycled coarse aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 260, 119888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.G.; Li, S.P.; Hughes, P.; Fan, Y.H. Mechanical properties and microstructure of basalt fibre and nano-silica reinforced recycled concrete after exposure to elevated temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 247, 118561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zheng, Y.X.; Zhuo, J.B.; Zhang, P. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-SiO2 and basalt-fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2022, 11, 2169–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W. Bending performance of unbonded prestressed basalt fiber recycled concrete beams. Eng. Struct. 2020, 221, 110937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dong, J.; Wang, Q.Y.; Guan, Z.; Chai, H. High-temperature behaviour of basalt fibre reinforced concrete made with recycled aggregates from earthquake waste. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 48, 103895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. GB 50010-2010; Code for Design of Concrete Structures. China Architecture and Building Press: Beijing, China, 2010. (In Chinese)
  44. Dilbas, H.; Çakır, Ö.; Yıldırım, H. An experimental investigation on fracture parameters of recycled aggregate concrete with optimized ball milling method. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 252, 119118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Coarse aggregate: (a) Natural coarse aggregate and (b) recycled coarse aggregate.
Figure 1. Coarse aggregate: (a) Natural coarse aggregate and (b) recycled coarse aggregate.
Materials 16 02520 g001
Figure 2. Basalt fiber.
Figure 2. Basalt fiber.
Materials 16 02520 g002
Figure 3. The slump measurement of the BFRRAC mixture.
Figure 3. The slump measurement of the BFRRAC mixture.
Materials 16 02520 g003
Figure 4. Elastic modulus loading time history.
Figure 4. Elastic modulus loading time history.
Materials 16 02520 g004
Figure 5. Elastic modulus test.
Figure 5. Elastic modulus test.
Materials 16 02520 g005
Figure 6. The failure morphology of cubic specimens: (a) different replacement ratio (b) different BF content.
Figure 6. The failure morphology of cubic specimens: (a) different replacement ratio (b) different BF content.
Materials 16 02520 g006
Figure 7. The failure morphology of prism specimens: (a) different replacement ratio (b) different BF content.
Figure 7. The failure morphology of prism specimens: (a) different replacement ratio (b) different BF content.
Materials 16 02520 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of cubic compressive strength.
Figure 8. Comparison of cubic compressive strength.
Materials 16 02520 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of axial compressive strength.
Figure 9. Comparison of axial compressive strength.
Materials 16 02520 g009
Figure 10. The fitting curve of the cubic compressive strength of specimens under different variable parameters: (a) fitting curve of fcu,γ/fcu,a and γ (b) fitting curve of fcu,λ/fcu,b and λ.
Figure 10. The fitting curve of the cubic compressive strength of specimens under different variable parameters: (a) fitting curve of fcu,γ/fcu,a and γ (b) fitting curve of fcu,λ/fcu,b and λ.
Materials 16 02520 g010
Figure 11. The fitting curve of the axial compressive strength of specimens under different variable parameters: (a) fitting curve of fc,γ/fc,a and γ and (b) fitting curve of fc,λ/fc,b and λ.
Figure 11. The fitting curve of the axial compressive strength of specimens under different variable parameters: (a) fitting curve of fc,γ/fc,a and γ and (b) fitting curve of fc,λ/fc,b and λ.
Materials 16 02520 g011
Figure 12. The fitting curve of the relation between the cubic compressive strength and the axial compressive strength of the specimen: (a) fitting curve of fc,γ/fcu,γ and γ and (b) fitting curve of fc,λ/fcu,λ and λ.
Figure 12. The fitting curve of the relation between the cubic compressive strength and the axial compressive strength of the specimen: (a) fitting curve of fc,γ/fcu,γ and γ and (b) fitting curve of fc,λ/fcu,λ and λ.
Materials 16 02520 g012
Figure 13. The comparison between the fc/fcu test and the formula calculation results: (a) different BF content of RP [33,34,39,41,42] and (b) different replacement ratio of RP [33,34,39,41,42].
Figure 13. The comparison between the fc/fcu test and the formula calculation results: (a) different BF content of RP [33,34,39,41,42] and (b) different replacement ratio of RP [33,34,39,41,42].
Materials 16 02520 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of the elastic modulus.
Figure 14. Comparison of the elastic modulus.
Materials 16 02520 g014
Figure 15. Comparison of the Poisson’s ratio.
Figure 15. Comparison of the Poisson’s ratio.
Materials 16 02520 g015
Figure 16. The elastic modulus and the fitting curve under different variable parameters: (a) fitting curve of Ec,γ/Ecc and γ and (b) fitting curve of Ec,λ/Ecc and λ.
Figure 16. The elastic modulus and the fitting curve under different variable parameters: (a) fitting curve of Ec,γ/Ecc and γ and (b) fitting curve of Ec,λ/Ecc and λ.
Materials 16 02520 g016
Figure 17. The comparison between the test and the formula calculation results of Ec: (a) different BF content of RP [33,35,39,41] and (b) different replacement ratio of RP [28,41,44].
Figure 17. The comparison between the test and the formula calculation results of Ec: (a) different BF content of RP [33,35,39,41] and (b) different replacement ratio of RP [28,41,44].
Materials 16 02520 g017
Figure 18. Micromorphology of BFRRAC: (a) mortar matrix, (b) recycled aggregate concrete, (c) natural aggregate concrete, (d) pit of BF, and (e) failure morphology of BF.
Figure 18. Micromorphology of BFRRAC: (a) mortar matrix, (b) recycled aggregate concrete, (c) natural aggregate concrete, (d) pit of BF, and (e) failure morphology of BF.
Materials 16 02520 g018
Table 1. The quality indexes of ordinary Portland cement Grade 42.5.
Table 1. The quality indexes of ordinary Portland cement Grade 42.5.
Fineness (%)Ignition Loss (%)SO3 (%)MgO (%)fcu (MPa)fcf (MPa)Initial Setting Time
(min)
Final Setting Time
(min)
1.302.412.452.11518.5180265
Table 2. Basic physical properties of coarse aggregate.
Table 2. Basic physical properties of coarse aggregate.
Aggregate TypeParticle Size (mm)Bulk Density (kg/m3)Apparent Density (kg/m3)Water Content (%)Water Absorption (%)Water Content (%)
Natural5~31.5168124980.00.10.0
Recycled5~31.5127421962.05.60.0
Table 3. Quality indices of BF.
Table 3. Quality indices of BF.
Diameter (μm)Length
(mm)
Density (kg/m3)Tensile Strength (MPa)Elastic Modulus (GPa)Elongation at Break (%)
151826504150~485093~1153.0~3.2
Table 4. Mixture proportion of RAC (kg/m3).
Table 4. Mixture proportion of RAC (kg/m3).
γ (%)W/BSand Ratio (%)Net WaterAditional WaterCementFly AshRecycled Coarse AggregateNatural Coarse AggregateSandWater Reducer
00.40312050.0427.185.40.01115.25012.56
500.403120531.2427.185.4557.6557.65012.56
1000.403120562.5427.185.41115.20.05012.56
Note: Recycled course aggregate replacement ratio represented by γ. The dosage of fly ash is 20% of the cement content. The water reducer is 0.5% of the cementitious materials (cement and fly ash).
Table 5. Property indices of BFRRAC.
Table 5. Property indices of BFRRAC.
γ (%)λ (kg/m3)fcu (MPa)fc (MPa)Ec (GPa)νc
0252.841.533.50.22
50048.534.929.20.23
250.736.131.40.20
451.938.534.60.18
100246.132.228.30.23
Note: The volume content corresponding to 0, 2, and 4 kg/m3 is 0%, 0.075%, and 0.15%, respectively. The BF content is expressed by λ. The cubic compressive strength is expressed by fcu. The axial compressive strength is expressed by fc. The elastic modulus is expressed by Ec, and its value is the ratio value of stress to strain at 0.5 fc on the stress−strain curve of BFRRAC. The Poisson’s ratio is expressed by νc.
Table 6. Results of ANOVA for cubic and axial compressive strength.
Table 6. Results of ANOVA for cubic and axial compressive strength.
Dependent VariableIndependent VariableDegrees of FreedomSum of SquaresVarianceFpContribution
(%)
fcuBF content217.0098.5053.7880.06011.44
γ269.94634.97315.5790.00159.83
Error1022.4492.245 28.73
Total14109.404 100
fcBF content219.2659.6336.1720.0189.76
γ2130.48565.24241.8060.00077.03
Error1015.6061.561 13.21
Total14165.356 100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Zhou, G.; Xu, P.; Fu, L.; Deng, D.; Kuang, X.; Fan, Y. Mechanical Properties under Compression and Microscopy Analysis of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Materials 2023, 16, 2520. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062520

AMA Style

Zhang X, Zhou G, Xu P, Fu L, Deng D, Kuang X, Fan Y. Mechanical Properties under Compression and Microscopy Analysis of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Materials. 2023; 16(6):2520. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062520

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xianggang, Gaoqiang Zhou, Ping Xu, Lei Fu, Dapeng Deng, Xiaomei Kuang, and Yuhui Fan. 2023. "Mechanical Properties under Compression and Microscopy Analysis of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete" Materials 16, no. 6: 2520. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062520

APA Style

Zhang, X., Zhou, G., Xu, P., Fu, L., Deng, D., Kuang, X., & Fan, Y. (2023). Mechanical Properties under Compression and Microscopy Analysis of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Materials, 16(6), 2520. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062520

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop