Next Article in Journal
Effects of Misalignment of c-axis on the Properties of Hydrogenation–Disproportionation–Desorption–Recombination Particles
Next Article in Special Issue
Model of Shape Memory Alloy Actuator with the Usage of LSTM Neural Network
Previous Article in Journal
The Different Properties of Geopolymer Composites Reinforced with Flax Fibers and Carbon Fibers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Test Rig for Investigating the Functional and Structural Fatigue of Shape Memory Alloy Wires Based on Different Activation Profiles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Utilization of Shape Memory Alloy as a Reinforcing Material in Building Structures: A Review

by
Lidan Xu
1,2,3,
Miaomiao Zhu
1,
Jitao Zhao
4,
Ming Chen
1,2 and
Mingfang Shi
1,2,3,*
1
School of Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China
2
Intelligent Construction and Operation Engineering Research Center, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China
3
Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Safety and Durability for Civil Engineering, Baotou 014010, China
4
School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Panzhihua University, Panzhihua 617000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(11), 2634; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112634
Submission received: 28 March 2024 / Revised: 21 May 2024 / Accepted: 24 May 2024 / Published: 29 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling and Design Based on Shape Memory Behavior)

Abstract

:
Shape memory alloy (SMA), a type of smart material, is widely used in the design of reinforcement and repair, isolation, and shock absorption of building structures because of its outstanding characteristics, such as the shape memory effect (SME), superelasticity (SE), and high damping. It not only improves the bearing capacity, ductility, and mechanical properties of the structural components of buildings but can also effectively slow down the strong response of engineering structures under the effect of an earthquake. It plays a key role in energy dissipation and shock absorption as well as sustainable development. To promote the application of SMA in building structures, this paper summarizes the research on the use of SMA as a reinforcing material in building structures, including work related to SMA material characteristics and types, SMA-reinforced structural components, and SMA isolation devices. In addition, the shortcomings of SMA applications in building structures are analyzed, and valuable suggestions for future research methods are put forward. SMA has been applied to engineering practice in the form of embedded and external reinforcement, which shows that it has broad application prospects in future buildings.

1. Introduction

The number of construction projects has increased with the rapid development of the economy and the continuous advancement of urbanization, and the safety of these projects has become a top priority [1,2,3]. With the development and updating of regulations and standards, many buildings, due to inherent problems such as design and construction methods, do not meet the current regulatory requirements. They are also affected by environmental and natural disasters (such as floods, earthquakes, typhoons, and fires), which reduce the strength of reinforced concrete (RC) structural components and cause damage and destruction, resulting in a considerable attenuation of their resistance and severe security hazards [4,5,6,7]. According to the “Uniform standard for design of civil buildings” [8], many buildings have reached the end of their service life, and there are significant challenges in ensuring the safety and durability of RC components. The reinforcement and transformation of existing, old buildings to meet people’s needs represent an alternative to demolition or reconstruction. At the same time, the tense situation caused by the continuous advancement of urbanization of land use has become increasingly prominent. To ensure the high quality and effective application of land resources, it is necessary to proactively plan in advance. It is urgent to scientifically evaluate the damage law and degree of existing buildings and carry out maintenance and reinforcement to delay the process of structural damage and prolong the service life of buildings. The existing data show that China is simultaneously in the stages of construction and maintenance and renovation, and developed countries such as the United States and Japan invest equally in strengthening and renovating existing buildings as in constructing new buildings. Therefore, it is of great significance to repair and reinforce existing buildings based on various damage factors and damage degrees.
Common reinforcement methods include the increasing section reinforcement method [9], cladding steel reinforcement method [10,11], and prestressed reinforcement method [12,13]. Although these approaches can improve the mechanical performance of RC structural members to varying degrees, they do not comprehensively account for economy and efficiency and have their defects. To solve these problems, it is necessary to use more advanced process methods and new materials to improve the reinforcement technology and obtain a simple and feasible reinforcement method. Shape memory alloy (SMA), as a smart material, has many desirable properties such as the shape memory effect (SME), superelasticity (SE), high energy consumption, and biocompatibility. It has been widely used in the automobile [14,15,16], aerospace [17,18,19,20], robotics [21,22], and biomedical [23,24,25] fields, as shown in Figure 1. SMA has a higher energy density, higher driving frequency, larger output stress and strain, and higher fatigue resistance than other advanced materials such as magnetorheological, piezoelectric, and viscoelastic materials. Its comprehensive performance is superior, and it has wide application potential in engineering, giving it broad appeal. With the progress of research and technology, SMA has gradually been applied in the field of building structures, as shown in Figure 2. Its advantages are mainly reflected in three aspects: ① The SE of SMA endows the structure with a good energy dissipation capacity and self-resetting capacity, meaning that cracks and displacements in the structure can easily be suppressed. ② Due to its SME, SMA can produce a large driving force, which can apply prestress to the structure, increase the cracking load, and improve the overall performance of the structure. ③ Reasonable use of high damping characteristics of SMA can lead to significant energy consumption. The structural vibration response can thus be reduced, and shock absorption can be achieved. Figure 3 shows the literature survey results on the application of SMA to various components of building structures from 2003 to 2023 obtained through the official China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Elsevier websites. The research on SMA applications in building structures focuses on beam components (38.76% on average), and the average proportions of research on column components, beam–column joints, and shear walls are 20.43%, 19.64%, and 17.88%, respectively. There is very little research on slab components (3.29% on average).
This paper summarizes the application of the unique properties of different forms (rods, wires, plates, and strips) of SMA in building structures, and Appendix A summarizes the application of SMA in various building structural components (beams, columns, beam–column joints, shear walls, and slabs) in the past decade. It is found from the table that SMA has been widely used in the reinforcement and restoration of building structures. Especially in the past five years, Fe-SMA has attracted the attention of researchers because of its relatively low price and made the application scenarios of SMA more extensive. In this paper, the characteristics, types, and mechanism of SMA are expounded. Then, starting from the application of SMA in building structures, the role of SMA in different structural components of building (beams, columns, beam–column joints, walls, and plates, etc.) is analyzed, and the shortcomings of existing research are outlined. Finally, combined with the application of SMA in practical engineering, the future research and development trend of SMA materials is analyzed to provide a reference for further research of SMA in building structures.

2. SMA Characteristics and Types

SMA has a development history of nearly 90 years. Swedish scientist Ölander [26] first discovered the phenomenon of martensite fluctuation with temperature variation when studying Au-Cd alloy in 1932, which was a prelude to the study of SMA materials. In the following 30 years, American scholars Chang et al. [27] and Rachikger [28] also observed similar phenomena in Au-Cd and Cu-Al-Ni alloys, respectively. In 1962, Buehler et al. [29] in the United States discovered memory behavior in Ni-Ti alloy, which was coined the SME and attracted wide attention from researchers. Since then, many scholars have studied the performance, microstructure, and types of SMA, laying the foundation for its application.

2.1. SMA Characteristics

2.1.1. SMA Phase Transition

SMA has two different crystal structure states: One exists in the form of the martensite phase at lower temperatures, with characteristics of low hardness, easy deformation, and stability at low temperatures. The other is in the form of the austenite phase or parent phase at higher temperatures and has the characteristics of high hardness, low deformation, and stability at high temperatures. Moreover, the transformation between the austenite phase and the martensite phase can be realized by changing the temperature or applying external forces [30,31]. SMA has four characteristic phase transition temperatures, which are martensite start (Mf), martensite finish (Ms), austenite start (As), and austenite finish (Af), among which Mf < Ms < As < Af. At room temperature, SMA generally exists in the parent phase, namely the austenite phase. When the ambient temperature of SMA is below Ms, the austenite contained within will begin to transform into martensite. The transformation process is not declared complete until the ambient temperature is below Mf, at which point its martensite content is 100%. When the ambient temperature of SMA is heated to As, martensite will transform into austenite, and the process will not be fully completed until its temperature rises to Af [32,33,34], as shown in Figure 4.
The phase transition behavior of NiTi-based SMA is significantly affected by the chemical composition and microstructure of the alloy. The phase transition path of solid solution binary NiTi alloy is B2 (parent phase, cubic crystal structure) → B19′ (martensitic phase, monoclinic crystal structure). The change in microstructure [35,36] (grain size, precipitated phase, dislocation, etc.) can cause the R phase to appear in the phase transition path of NiTi SMA. The R phase is the pre-phase transition product of the alloy before the martensitic transition and the R phase transition is the same as the martensitic phase transition. In the process of deformation, the surface of the phase can undergo a convex elastic change, but the deformation variable is much smaller than that of the martensitic phase transition, accounting for only about 1/10 [37]. Doping of many elements also changed the phase transition path of NiTi alloy; for example, the doping of the Fe element caused the appearance of the R phase [38], and the doping of the Cu element caused the appearance of the B19 phase (martensite phase, rhomboidal structure) [39]. Nb, Fe, Co, Cr, V, Mn, A1 [40,41], and other elements reduced the martensitic phase transition point of NiTi alloy, while Pt, Pd, Hf, Ta, Zr, Au, Cu [42,43,44], and other elements increased it.

2.1.2. SME

The SME refers to the plastic deformation recovery performance of SMA in a low-temperature martensitic state, where the material’s plastic deformation is restored after an increase in ambient temperature due to a certain limit of unloading and irreversible plastic deformation caused by external forces [45], as shown in Figure 5a. The SME is essentially caused by martensitic transformation inside the alloy. In short, the SMA is first heated above the temperature T > Af to shape, and the interior of the specimen is mostly austenite phase. It is then cooled below the temperature T < Mf and unloaded after loading to achieve residual deformation. When the deformed specimen is reheated to the above Af level, the specimen will return to the shape before the deformation [46,47].

2.1.3. SE

SMA is not only known for its SME but also for its excellent SE and has gained widespread attention. The strain of SMA in the austenitic phase state is much higher than the elastic limit strain of the alloy, and the phenomenon whereby the deformation can automatically recover after unloading is called SE, as shown in Figure 5b. The essence of SE is the internal friction phenomenon in the process of stress-induced martensitic transformation and martensitic reverse transformation. Specifically, SMA maintains an austenitic phase transition at room temperature, which generally depends on the alloy composition and the resulting phase transition temperature. At this time, multiple martensitic variants tend to a single variant in the direction most conducive toward deformation, leading to the deformation of the alloy. However, this type of martensite remains stable only under external stress. When the alloy is unloaded, the martensitic instability immediately undergoes a reverse phase transformation back to the parent phase, and the shape of the alloy also returns to its original state [48,49,50].

2.1.4. High Damping

Damping capacity is used to describe the ability of a material to block energy in the process of structural mechanical vibration or wave propagation through deformation and gradually dissipate it. Damping performance is an important index used to monitor the energy consumption, vibration, and fatigue fracture of materials. SMA has good damping performance due to the self-coordination ability of martensitic transition, the formation of various interfaces (phase interfaces, twin interfaces, variant interfaces, etc.), and the relative movement of the interfaces (hysteretic elastic migration) absorbing a large amount of energy during the transformation process [51]. Studies have shown that the damping magnitude of SMA is the mixed coexistence state of martensitic phase and austenite phase > martensite phase state > complete austenite phase state [52].

2.2. Types of SMA

More than 100 types of SMA have been discovered to date, among which the most widely used are three types of SMA based on nickel titanium (NiTi-SMA), copper (Cu-SMA) and iron (Fe-SMA). Ni-Ti alloy is the earliest studied, and the production process has reached a mature stage of commercialization. It has the advantages of large recoverable strain/stress, strong adaptive ability, high tensile strength, excellent corrosion resistance, good fatigue resistance, and ease of coupling with other substrates, but its high price limits its development [53,54]. Cu-based alloy has a low price (about 1/10 of Ni-Ti alloy), and its phase transition has an excellent SE effect, but its recovery stress is low. It also has coarse grains, easy fracture of grain boundaries, and poor phase transition stability, resulting in slow progress [55]. Fe-based alloy has attracted increasing attention because of its comparable stress and low cost compared with Ni-Ti alloy, but its poor corrosion resistance and unstable performance mean that it is not as widely used as Ni-Ti alloy [56,57]. Figure 6 shows the ultimate stress and recovery strain of commonly used building materials and different types of SMA. Steel and aluminum are displayed next to the longitudinal axis, indicating that they have high strength but relatively low recovery strain. The elastomer is located next to the horizontal axis, indicating that this type of material has relatively low strength, but it is more likely to restore its shape after unloading. Most of the SMAs are concentrated in the same location, demonstrating that the strength and recoverability of SMA have a better balance, wherein the recovery strain of Ni-Ti alloy is relatively stable, and the recovery strain of Fe-Ni-Co-Al-Ta-B is higher [58,59,60].

3. The Application of SMA in Structural Components of Building

Due to the characteristics of SMA such as the SME and SE, its application in building structures has been widely studied. Among these studies, a considerable amount of research has been conducted on the application of SMA-reinforced beams, columns, beam–column joint areas, shear walls, and slab components, as shown in Figure 7. The related applications and development of SMA will be introduced in the following section.

3.1. SMA-Reinforced Concrete Beams

Concrete beams are among the main load-bearing components in building structures and are widely used. The research on SMA used in beam components focuses on the self-healing, flexural, and shear performance of concrete beams. Therefore, the following three aspects are introduced.

3.1.1. Self-Healing Performance

Concrete is a type of brittle material that inevitably exhibits many different forms and degrees of cracks during the construction and use of concrete structures. This not only affects the appearance of the structure but also inhibits its normal function. The original deflection and cracks in SMA can be restored by utilizing the SME and recovery deformation to generate a large driving force. Figure 8 shows that there are two installation techniques for self-healing of SMA. One is to replace the tensile reinforcement of beams with SMA, and the other is to fix SMA in the tensile area of the beam with anchors. After the component is deformed or cracked under load conditions, the SMA is thermally excited. At this time, the restoring force generated by SMA can act on the structure to heal cracks in concrete beams.
Sakai et al. [61] used SE SMA to embed SMA wires in the austenite state in mortar beams for the three-point bending test. The results showed that the deformation range of the SMA mortar beam was more than seven times that of the reinforced mortar beam, and almost all of its cracks were closed after unloading. Lee et al. [62] and Choi et al. [63] later studied the effect of SMA reinforcement by replacing tensile steel bars on the self-healing performance of the beam. Choi et al. [63] performed thermal excitation of SMA with fire to close cracks, as shown in Figure 9a. Li et al. [64,65] proposed a new repair method: CFRP plate-SMA steel wire composite reinforcement of simply supported beams. Through experiments and finite element analysis, it was found that SMA reinforcement played an important role in reducing residual deformation and closing cracks.
In addition, Kuang and Ou [66] combined SE SMA with the bonding properties of repair adhesives to create self-healing concrete beams. Through static load tests, it was found that the SE of SMA could drive the repair of cracks. The brittle fibers containing the adhesive broke and released the adhesive into the cracks to complete the repair. However, due to the complexity of this structure, the arrangement of SMA filament and repair fibers was difficult, which limited the further application of this method. The specific device is shown in Figure 9b. Bonilla et al. [67] combined SMA with microcapsules to repair cracks in concrete and used crack monitoring and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to evaluate the healing of cracks over time and characterize the healing components in the crack region. The results showed that the combination of the two approaches could lead to better repair of cracks in concrete.
In addition to embedding alloy wire into a beam, Xue et al. [68] fixed NiTi-SMA wire as external prestressed tendons outside an RC beam, stopped loading after reaching a certain load value, and then performed thermal excitation on the alloy wire, so that the deflection of the concrete beam in the early loading process could be restored to a certain extent. Yang et al. [69] and Sun et al. [70,71] compared the repair of beam cracks using two methods of embedded SMA and externally installed SMA and studied the effect of unbonded length on the self-healing ability of embedded SMA wires. The results revealed that the cracks could be repaired effectively using both methods. The longer the unbonded length of embedded SMA, the better the crack repair.
In summary, SMA can indeed play an effective role in the repair of concrete cracks. However, the size of the SMA concrete beam components studied is relatively small, and this effect has not been considered. The size of the components may affect the effectiveness of the alloy in practical engineering. Therefore, more research should be conducted on full-scale beams in practical engineering. Regarding the repair problems of existing projects, the external installation of SMA is more due to the internal setting of SMA. However, the anchorage and excitation methods used need to be further optimized. Reliable and applicable prestressed anchorage and excitation methods have been developed to ensure the stability of prestress and have provided a stronger theoretical basis and technical support for the application of SMA in crack repair of concrete components.

3.1.2. Flexural Performance

In this type of research, the pre-deformed SMA is usually installed and fixed in the tensile zone of the beam, and thermal excitation is immediately applied to it. The recovery force generated by the SMA causes the structure to prestress, thereby improving its bending capacity. SMA can be used to strengthen concrete beams via near-surface mounting (NSM), embedding in the shotcrete layer, external fixation, and internal setting. The research on using these four installation techniques used to strengthen concrete beams to improve their flexural performance is described below.
Most researchers in this field have adopted the method of NSM to achieve prestressed reinforcement of concrete beams and verified the effectiveness of this approach. In this method, grooves are first carved on the concrete protective layer, SMA rebars/slats are placed in the grooves, and then epoxy resin or cement mortar are used to fill in the grooves. Shahverdi et al. [72] and Hong et al. [73] embedded Fe-SMA plates in the protective layers of RC beams and then thermally stimulated the SMA to generate prestress. The flexural performance of the prestressed concrete beams was tested, as shown in Figure 10a. It was found that prestressed reinforcement with SMA could obviously increase the cracking load, improve the fatigue resistance, and reduce the crack width and mid-span deflection of concrete beams. Then, Yeon et al. [74] used OpenSees software (https://opensees.berkeley.edu/) to conduct finite element modeling and analysis of the reference [72], verified the validity of the finite element model, and studied the influence of concrete strength, level of reinforcement, and number of Fe-SMA strips on the bending behavior of RC beams. In addition, Canadian scholars Rojob and El-Hacha [75,76] conducted experimental studies on the flexural properties of prestressed RC beams strengthened with NSM Fe-SMA reinforcement in long-term freeze–thaw cycles and under fatigue load conditions, as shown in Figure 10b. The results showed that using NSM Fe-SMA reinforcement significantly improved the performance of RC beams under service load conditions.
Shahverdi et al. [77] also conducted a bending study on beams reinforced with pre-embedded SMA steel bars in a sprayed concrete layer, as shown in Figure 10c. The results revealed that the prestressed Fe-SMA rebars significantly improved the performance of the normal use stage. It was feasible to embed ribbed Fe-SMA bars in the newly laid shotcrete layer on the bottom of the reinforced concrete beam, and the reinforcement effect was good. Dolatabadi et al. [78] used ABAQUS to conduct numerical studies on RC beams reinforced by Fe-SMA reinforcement and shotcrete in reference [77]. Michels et al. [79] and Strieder et al. [80] also studied the bending performance of concrete beams reinforced with external Fe-SMA strips. Michels et al. [79] used shooting nails to anchor SMA strips and concrete, while Strieder et al. [80] developed a special clamping device to anchor SMA strips and concrete, as shown in Figure 10d. The results showed that there was no damage to the anchorage at the end of the Fe-SMA strip during the loading process. The cracking load, yield load, and ultimate load of the reinforced beam were significantly increased. Due to the effect of prestressing SMA, the development of cracks was also improved.
Some scholars have studied the influence of SMA as a longitudinal reinforcement on the flexural performance of RC beams. Abdulridha et al. [81] studied the mechanical properties of concrete beams with SE SMA bars replacing ordinary steel bars in the critical region (pure bend section of the beam) under monotonic and cyclic loads. The results showed that the existence of SMA bars improved the energy dissipation capacity of beams under cyclic loading conditions. Hong et al. [82] studied the flexural performance of concrete beams with Fe-SMA steel bars of different cross-sectional areas as tensile steel bars and found that the cracking load of concrete beams was significantly increased after SMA activation (by 47.6–113%).
Figure 10. Flexural properties of SMA-strengthened RC beam: (a) NSM of Fe-SMA plate [72]; (b) NSM of Fe-SMA bars [75,76]; (c) Fe-SMA bars installed in the new shotcrete layer at the bottom of the beam [77]; (d) external mechanical anchoring of Fe-SMA strips at the bottom of concrete beams [80].
Figure 10. Flexural properties of SMA-strengthened RC beam: (a) NSM of Fe-SMA plate [72]; (b) NSM of Fe-SMA bars [75,76]; (c) Fe-SMA bars installed in the new shotcrete layer at the bottom of the beam [77]; (d) external mechanical anchoring of Fe-SMA strips at the bottom of concrete beams [80].
Materials 17 02634 g010
In summary, SMA can improve the flexural bearing capacity and deformation capacity of RC beams regardless of the installation technology used. In existing studies, SMA is usually excited by electric heating to apply prestress, but this method requires a large electric current, which has security risks and low economic practicability. Secondly, in practical engineering, beams are often reinforced after certain damage occurs, and the existing studies are mainly related to the flexural resistance of intact beams; so, it is necessary to explore the performance of test beams under secondary loading conditions.

3.1.3. Shear Performance

Concrete beams under load will experience bending and shear failure. Compared with bending failure, shear failure is less anticipated and more obvious and can cause large-scale casualties and economic losses. By utilizing the SME characteristics of SMA, prestress can be generated without tension on site, realizing active shear reinforcement of concrete beams.
Other researchers [83,84,85] have produced closed hoops with Fe-SMA strips for shear reinforcement of concrete beams and used industrial buckles or screws to anchor the strips, as shown in Figure 11a. Although there was still a small gap between the strip and the beam after anchoring, the gap disappeared after energized excitation. It was found that the SMA excitation not only improved the shear strength of the concrete beam but also effectively alleviated the development of cracks. Ruiz-Pinilla et al. [86] later proposed a constitutive model of Fe-SMA according to the Ramberg–Osgood model and simulated the experiments in reference [83] to verify the effectiveness of the model. Czaderski et al. [87] from the EMPA Laboratory in Switzerland combined U-shaped Fe-SMA bars with sprayed cement mortar to strengthen T-shaped concrete beams, as shown in Figure 11b. The results indicated that the shear resistance of RC T-beams was obviously improved under the effect of Fe-SMA stirrups and a new mortar layer. After the shear failure occurred, there was no interface failure between the new mortar layer and the original concrete, and the Fe-SMA stirrup did not fail.
Figure 11. SMA shear-strengthened RC beam: (a) anchorage method [83,84]; (b) stirrups embedded with sprayed mortar [87].
Figure 11. SMA shear-strengthened RC beam: (a) anchorage method [83,84]; (b) stirrups embedded with sprayed mortar [87].
Materials 17 02634 g011
The shear strengthening of RC beams using SE SMA was studied by Mas et al. [88], who investigated the effect of SE Ni-Ti SMA rectangular spirals on the performance of shear critical RC beams. In recent years, SMA has been used for shear reinforcement of RC beams in the form of internal stirrups. Ji et al. [89] and Hong et al. [90] studied the influence of Fe-SMA stirrup spacing and its effect shear performance and used finite element software for simulation and analysis. The results showed that SMA stirrups improved the shear strength and initial stiffness of the component and delayed the formation of cracks, verifying the effectiveness of the model.
In summary, SMA can indeed play an effective role in the shear reinforcement of concrete beams, but it requires high anchoring technology to ensure that the gap between SMA and concrete is as small as possible. Considering that the external enclosed hoop form of SMA does not meet the requirements to be applied to practical engineering, it is necessary to propose new reinforcement methods and anchoring systems and carry out research to find suitable alternatives.

3.2. SMA-Reinforced Concrete Columns

In building structures, concrete columns are the main load-bearing components, and they are more susceptible to the degradation of mechanical properties than other components. The exploration of effective repair and reinforcement of columns has become an urgent task. SMA materials have excellent damping properties and energy consumption capacity due to the self-coordination of martensitic phase transition and the various phase interfaces formed in martensitic, as well as the movement of the interfaces. Therefore, SMA can be used for external winding arrangements of RC columns in the form of wires or strips to enhance the axial compression and seismic performance of concrete column members.

3.2.1. Axial Compression Performance

When SMA is wrapped on the surface of RC columns in the form of wires or strips, it will exert a restraining effect on the internal concrete. The ultimate strength and deformation ability of concrete columns can be improved comprehensively due to the strong lateral confinement ability and good deformation ability of SMA.
Andrawes et al. [91,92,93] and Choi et al. [94] almost simultaneously proposed a method of applying lateral confinement to concrete columns via thermally triggered prestressing of martensitic SMA wires. Choi et al. [95,96] conducted a comparative test on the axial compression properties of SMA-reinforced specimens and thin-walled steel tube reinforced specimens. The results showed that the failure strain of the SMA-wire-reinforced concrete column was significantly increased, up to 20%, and the energy dissipation performance of the column was greatly improved. With the same volume configuration ratio, the enhancement effect of SMA on the ultimate bearing capacity and failure deformation of concrete columns was better than that of thin-walled steel tube reinforcement. Subsequently, Tran et al. [97], Gholampour et al. [98], and Hong et al. [99] studied the effects of different factors on the axial compression performance of concrete columns strengthened by SMA, such as the amount of SMA, the level of prestress, and the form of confinement. The results demonstrated that SMA wire could enhance the axial bearing capacity and deformation properties of concrete columns. The ultimate bearing capacity of concrete columns also increased with the increase in the amount of SMA and the level of prestress. Chen et al. [100] and Suhail et al. [101] compared the axial compression performance of concrete columns confined by SMA and fiber-reinforced polymers/plastics (FRPs), while El-Hacha et al. [102] studied the compression performance of concrete columns reinforced by SMA wire under eccentric load. The results showed that the SMA confined columns exhibited higher ductility and residual strength than the confined FRP members.
The above studies analyzed the axial compression properties of SMA-strengthened concrete columns from the experimental perspective, while Chen et al. [103,104] and Abdelrahman et al. [105] further studied the performance of SMA active reinforcement from a theoretical viewpoint. Based on the plastic theory, the NiTiNb-SMA confined concrete constitutive model was proposed. This model can be utilized to predict and simulate the three-dimensional stress–strain behavior of NiTiNb-SMA confined concrete under monotonic and cyclic loads. In the in-depth study of SMA, Fe-SMA has attracted the attention of researchers because of its lower cost. Jeong et al. [106] compared the axial compression performance of concrete columns confined by Fe-SMA strips and carbon fiber-reinforced plastics (CFRPs), while Han et al. [107] investigated the influence of three variables (constraint types, number of FRP strip layers, and strip spacing) on their performance. The results showed that the bearing capacity and deformation capacity of concrete columns could be effectively improved by all three constraint types, but the Fe-SMA active constraint was more efficient. Meanwhile, the combined constraints obviously influenced the improvement of the mechanical properties of concrete columns. Han et al. [107] proposed a verification calculation method for predicting the peak compressive stress of these specimens, providing a reference for selecting appropriate concrete column reinforcement methods. Subsequently, Zerbe et al. [108] evaluated the effects of different parameters (the presence of internal reinforcement, initial confining pressure, and the ratio of external SMA confinement) on the axial compression performance of Fe-SMA strips confined concrete columns through experiments. In addition, an analytical method was proposed to simulate the axial load–deformation behavior of the active confinement column. Vieira et al. [109] used finite element software to simulate and analyze the experiment, verified the correctness of the proposed model, and showed that the model could also predict the compression performance of SMA confined concrete columns under eccentric loads.
To sum up, SMA can effectively enhance the axial compression performance of column members. Reasonable anchoring methods are crucial in this regard, Figure 12 lists the anchoring methods of SMA-reinforced columns in the literature. Secondly, the existing research mainly focuses on the axial compression performance of circular cross-section columns, while in practical engineering, the cross-section forms of columns are diverse and are mostly complex situations under eccentric or multiple loads. Therefore, the performance of concrete columns under complex stress conditions still requires further study.

3.2.2. Seismic Performance

As the key bearing parts of building structures, RC columns have large axial compressive capacity and stiffness and often fail due to insufficient ductility. Brittle failure can easily occur due to insufficient deformation under the effect of an earthquake, which threatens the overall safety and reliability and even the collapse of the structure. Shin and Anderawes [110,111,112] conducted quasi-static tests on four 1/3-scaled RC columns and studied the effects of constraint methods and materials on the seismic performance of RC columns to determine the seismic ability of SMA-reinforced columns. The results showed that SMA active reinforcement columns had the highest degree of improvement in flexural ductility and energy dissipation capacity and the best control of concrete damage. In addition, the researchers [113] also produced spiral-shaped NiTiNb SMA to repair severely damaged RC columns. The repair time of each column was limited to 15 h, and quasi-static tests were performed on the columns within 24 h after the repair began. The results showed that the lateral strength of the two repaired RC columns was completely restored. This method significantly improved the lateral stiffness and ductility of earthquake-damaged RC columns.
In summary, few studies have been conducted on the seismic performance of SMA-reinforced columns in building structures. Through investigation, it was found that the research on the seismic performance of SMA columns focuses on the reinforcement of bridge pier columns using SMA in the form of longitudinal steel bars. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the research on this aspect using finite element simulation to achieve a more comprehensive understanding.

3.3. SMA-Reinforced Beam–Column Joints

The beam–column joint is the most essential and fragile part of the building structure and is responsible for distributing bending moment as well as transferring shear force and axial force. Many earthquake damage investigations have shown that beam–column joints are easily damaged under seismic force conditions and their failure will cause the destruction or even collapse of the whole structure. Therefore, improving the seismic performance of beam–column joints is particularly important for improving the seismic performance of the entire building. The beam–column joint area is enhanced using SMA to improve the energy dissipation and deformation recovery capacity of the structure under the effect of an earthquake.
Researchers have carried out relevant work on the seismic performance of SMA concrete beam–column joints. Youssef et al. [114,115,116] and Naher et al. [117] buried SE SMA bars as longitudinal reinforcements of beams and conducted experimental research and finite element analysis, as shown in Figure 13a. The results showed that the SE SMA reduced the residual deformation of beam–column joints compared with ordinary beam–column joints and had good self-resetting ability, deformation ability, and plastic hinge rotation ability. Oudah and El-Hacha [118,119] later considered using SMA to reinforce the plastic hinge zone of concrete to enhance the self-centering capability and reduce the direct cost of materials. SMA reduced joint deformation and moved the plastic hinge area away from the cylinder.
Pei et al. [120] put forward a new self-centering joint using SE SMA rods and steel plates as core components in the core area of the node, as shown in Figure 13b. The new joint structure of SMA reinforcement and steel plates improved the bearing capacity of the joint, delayed the stiffness degradation, and improved the ductility and self-centering capacity of the joint. Zafar and Andrawes [121] studied a new fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) embedded with SE SMA fibers, as shown in Figure 13c. The results indicated that the use of SMA-FRP bars in the plastic hinge zone significantly reduced the accumulation of permanent damage and residual deformation, thereby improving the overall performance of the frame under continuous earthquake disaster conditions.
Navarro-Gomez and Bonet [122] used SMA bars and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) in key areas of the structure to improve the seismic performance of the structure. The results showed that the combination of SMA and UHPC reduced deformation. Qian et al. [123,124,125] studied the seismic performance of RC frame joints reinforced by SE SMA bars and ultra-high-toughness, fiber-reinforced, engineering-cement-based composite (ECC), as shown in Figure 13d. The results revealed that pouring ECC after the plastic hinge area of the beam–column joint significantly improved the failure mode and ductility of the joint. SMA-ECC-reinforced beam–column joints achieved better functional self-healing ability after earthquakes and exhibited better self-healing performance in crack healing and internal damage repair.
Figure 13. SMA-reinforced beam–column joints: (a) schematic diagram of the SMA joint [114,115]; (b) 3D sketch of the self-centering joint [120]; (c) schematic diagram of the SMA-FRP joint [121]; (d) diagram of the beam–column joint [125].
Figure 13. SMA-reinforced beam–column joints: (a) schematic diagram of the SMA joint [114,115]; (b) 3D sketch of the self-centering joint [120]; (c) schematic diagram of the SMA-FRP joint [121]; (d) diagram of the beam–column joint [125].
Materials 17 02634 g013
In summary, the research of SMA-reinforced beam–column joints mainly focuses on the analysis of their seismic performance. Most of the research methods are combined with experimental analysis and numerical simulation, but relevant theoretical analysis is lacking. The research on the connection between SMA bars and steel bars in the beam–column joint area is insufficient. In addition, from the overall point of view of the frame structure system, comparative analysis of the seismic performance of different types of joints (such as end joints and middle joints) is still relatively rare, and it is worth conducting more comprehensive discussions.

3.4. SMA-Reinforced Shear Walls and Concrete Slabs

Shear walls are the main lateral force-resistant components of high-rise structures in earthquake-fortified areas. Their performance is crucial to the seismic performance of the entire building structure. The traditional method is to rely on improving the stiffness and strength of the component itself, but this approach cannot solve the problem of excessive residual deformation and macroscopic cracks of the structure under strong earthquake conditions. The SE of SMA can provide better energy dissipation capacity for shear walls and enhance their self-resetting ability and self-healing ability to improve the seismic performance and durability of the shear wall structure.
The research of SMA-reinforced shear wall members mainly focuses on finite element analysis. Based on the shear wall test model proposed by Thomsen et al. [126], Wang and Zhu [127] replaced the steel bar in the edge-constrained key area with SMA and used the finite element software OpenSees to simulate and analyze the self-resetting performance of SMA shear walls, as shown in Figure 14a. The analysis results showed that the residual displacement of the SMA shear wall was still small even at 2.5% inter-story displacement. SMA could meet the seismic response of the structure under large earthquake conditions. Ghassemieh et al. [128,129] developed the SMA constitutive model using the Fortran language and embedded it into Abaqus finite element software. Based on this model, they analyzed the seismic response of a five-story coupled shear wall and a two-story shear wall structure and compared the experimental results to verify the effectiveness of the model. Abraik and Youssef [130] used the vulnerability curve to evaluate the seismic performance and vulnerability of 10-story and 20-story structures. The results of interlayer displacement, residual displacement, and vulnerability proved that even if SMA was only applied to the key parts of the edge constraint, it significantly improved the seismic performance and reduced the residual displacement of the structure.
Cortés-Puentes and Palermo [131,132,133] developed an SMA tension bracket, as shown in Figure 14b. Through experiments and simulations, it was proven that this device improved the strength of RC shear walls while reducing the strength and stiffness degradation caused by shear failure. Abdulridha and Palermo [134] designed an SMA-reinforced shear wall component, as shown in Figure 14c. Through the cyclic loading test, it was found that SMA significantly improved the crack recovery ability of the component, even if the residual crack was 12%. The energy consumption of the SMA shear wall was lower than that of the ordinary shear wall due to the SE SMA reinforcement. Subsequently, Cortés-Puentes et al. [135] replaced the concrete in the damaged area of an SMA shear wall and carried out a cyclic loading test on it. The results showed that the yield load and ultimate load of the repaired shear wall were consistent with the original shear wall, which proved that the SMA shear wall could continue to be used after the earthquake with simple repair. Soares et al. [136] evaluated the seismic performance of the SMA shear wall through numerical simulation. Compared with the traditional steel-reinforced wall, the SMA shear wall had better self-resetting and energy dissipation capabilities.
Kian and Cruz-Noguez [137] introduced three new types of shear walls: the FRP shear wall, steel wire shear wall, and SMA shear wall. The seismic performance of the three types of shear walls was compared through quasi-static loading tests, and the recoverability mechanism of shear walls was discussed. Later, Abraik and Assaf [138] compared the seismic performance of different types of SMA (NiTi, FeNCATB, and CuAlMn)-reinforced shear walls with different ground motion durations, and the results showed that Cu-based RC walls showed better performance. In addition, they [139] used slotting technology to realize an SMA-reinforced shear wall in 2022 and explored its seismic performance under uniaxial and cyclic loads. The results showed that this method improved the bearing capacity and ductility of the wall and delayed strength degradation. In order to solve the problem of brittle cracking of ordinary concrete, Tabrizikahou et al. [140] combined Ni-Ti SMA strips and ECC to form an SMA-ECC shear wall and used Abaqus software (https://www.3ds.com/products/simulia/abaqus) for evaluation, as shown in Figure 14d. The results revealed that the combination of the two methods improved the shear wall’s energy dissipation capacity and led to a superior self-resetting ability and self-healing ability, thereby improving the seismic performance and durability of the shear wall structure.
In summary, the SE SMA can indeed improve the recoverable deformation performance of the concrete shear wall members and effectively reduce the damage to the building structure in the event of an earthquake. At present, the production cost of SMA material is high. When designing and optimizing SMA shear walls, unique design methods and reasonable reinforcement should be adopted to maximize the SE characteristics of SMA with low cost. Therefore, it is necessary to further optimize the design of the SMA shear wall structure.
Figure 14. SMA-reinforced shear walls: (a) finite element modeling of plastic zone of SMA-reinforced shear wall [127]; (b) SMA externally reinforced shear wall [131,132,133]; (c) SMA-reinforced shear wall design [134]; (d) SMA-ECC shear wall [140].
Figure 14. SMA-reinforced shear walls: (a) finite element modeling of plastic zone of SMA-reinforced shear wall [127]; (b) SMA externally reinforced shear wall [131,132,133]; (c) SMA-reinforced shear wall design [134]; (d) SMA-ECC shear wall [140].
Materials 17 02634 g014
After investigation, few studies on SMA-reinforced slab members were found. Yeon et al. [141] conducted a flexural test on unidirectional RC slabs with Fe-SMA reinforcement as the tensile steel bars and evaluated the influence of the recovery stress of Fe-SMA reinforcement on the flexural performance of the slabs. The results showed that the number and width of bending cracks decreased with Fe-SMA reinforcement, which was mainly due to the prestressing effect of the recovery stress generated by the Fe-SMA reinforcement.

4. SMA Isolation Devices in Building Structures

Earthquakes are sudden, unpredictable, and highly harmful natural disasters. The casualties and economic losses caused by earthquakes have a great impact on society and the economy. The consequences of earthquakes cannot be ignored [142]. In China’s seismic design code [143], it is required that structures have sufficient stiffness and strength to resist earthquakes. However, the current methods dissipate seismic energy via the structure itself, which has a significant effect on the main body of the structure. Moreover, due to the uncertainty of the earthquake, the structure cannot adapt to the earthquake effect at various intensities. Such a building is very likely to collapse because it does not meet the safety and stability requirements. Due to its excellent SME and SE characteristics, SMA is mainly used in structural supports and dampers in building structures, and a considerable amount of associated research has been carried out.

4.1. SMA Bearings

The bearing of the structure is an important component connecting the structure and the foundation. It is responsible for the functions of transmitting load and shock isolation. Existing research focuses on the composite bearing combining SMA and rubber materials: the SMA-laminated rubber bearing. Introducing SMA material into ordinary laminated rubber bearings can enhance their durability and shock absorption performance. SMA laminated rubber bearings utilize the SE and SME of SMA to provide greater vertical tensile strength and horizontal damping capacity, thereby enhancing the stability and damping effect of the bearings under earthquake or other vibration conditions.
Gjorgjiev and Garevski [144] combined low-damping rubber bearings with SMA as elastic elements, while Dezfuli and Alam [145] developed SMA-laminated rubber bearings with linear and cross arrangements, as shown in Figure 15a. In 2015, they [146] also studied double-cross SMA wires around the bearings, as shown in Figure 15b. Through numerical simulation, it was found that the presence of SMA wires improved the energy dissipation capacity to varying degrees, and the prestressing of SMA could enhance the vibration isolation capacity of SMA bearings. Li et al. [147] presented a new type of bearing: the SMA-wire-based roller bearing. Through experimental research, the results showed that the NiTi SMA prevented excessive displacement of the device, and the triangular constitutive model used accurately described the hysteresis behavior of the bearing.
SMA is also used in isolation bearings in other forms. Seo and Hu [148] installed SMA bending rods for self-centering on lead rubber bearings, as shown in Figure 15c. These bearings were equipped with different numbers of SMA bending rods and studied through nonlinear dynamic analysis. The results showed that the SMA bending rod system effectively reduced the residual displacement and provided greater flexibility and self-resetting ability for the entire building structure. Zheng et al. [149] developed and tested an isolation system composed of SMA stranded wire and friction sliding bearings, as shown in Figure 15d. A friction sliding bearing was used as the energy dissipation device, and the SMA stranded wire provided the reset ability. The test results revealed that the isolation system had a good energy dissipation and self-resetting effect. The related benefits of the earthquake-isolated building structure with SMA support could be quantified based on the assessment of toughness and life cycle loss. Cao et al. [150] designed a multi-level SMA/lead rubber bearing (ML-SLRB) and established and analyzed the finite element model of the system to evaluate its different responses in varying stages. The results indicated that the device could achieve multi-level performance and had lower residual displacement compared to traditional methods.
To sum up, research on SMA bearings mostly focuses on numerical simulation. Although there are relevant experimental data to assist in verifying the accuracy of the experiment, there is a lack of experimental data on the bearing entity. Static and shaking table tests on the bearing entity and further research and optimization are essential to understand the actual mechanical properties of the bearing and to lay a solid foundation for its practical application in engineering. Secondly, due to the high price of SMA, it is necessary to further consider the arrangement and connection mode when SMA is used with the bearing to give full play to the characteristics of SMA and enable the bearing to play a comprehensive and smart role.

4.2. SMA Dampers

A damper is a commonly used energy dissipation device that can effectively reduce the effects of earthquakes on structures. Combining a damper with SMA can not only improve the energy dissipation capacity but also provide a restoring force to better protect the damper, giving it the dual advantages of self-resetting and energy dissipation.
Wang et al. [151] discussed the manufacturing process and mechanical properties of a new self-resetting damper with a core component of an SMA ring spring, as shown in Figure 16a. The experimental study found that the damper had good energy dissipation performance with an equivalent viscous damping ratio of up to 18.5%. It effectively resisted strong earthquakes and had self-resetting driving effect without requiring maintenance. Zhang et al. [152] and Chen et al. [153] designed a new type of SMA rod damper by combining SMA rod and a friction damper, as shown in Figure 16b,c, and conducted cyclic tensile and compressive tests and finite element simulation. It was found that the damper had a better energy dissipation ability than the damper with SMA wire and was more flexible. Its initial stiffness and deformation capacity could also be adjusted. Sheikhi et al. [154] studied the performance of a natural rubber bearing system (NRB) equipped with a U-shaped damper, as shown in Figure 16d. The results showed that the U-shaped SMA damper had SE behavior and residual deformation reversibility, and the finite element method could accurately simulate the mechanical behavior of the damper. After verifying the validity of the model, the optimal SMA-to-steel thickness ratio was obtained to maximize the energy consumption of the damper and minimize the residual deformation.
Asgarian et al. [155] applied a new SMA self-centering hybrid damper to a five-story frame structure for nonlinear time-history analysis and showed that the damper effectively controlled the acceleration and interlayer displacement of the structure. Mirzai et al. [156] proposed a smart damper design parameter optimization adjustment method based on the cuckoo search algorithm. The cuckoo search algorithm (CSA) was used to study the optimal parameters of a new type of smart damper under the effect of an earthquake, considering the seismic response of four-story and nine-story buildings with seven pairs of ground motions. The results indicated that the CSA was suitable for determining the optimal parameters of shear polyurethane friction devices and SMA plate systems for buildings and considering seismic motion.
Although some research work on SMA dampers has been carried out both domestically and internationally, the research on the mechanical properties and damping effect of these types of smart dampers is still relatively limited. Although the effectiveness of the SMA damper has been proven via theory and experiments, this method also has shortcomings. The energy dissipation unit (SMA alone or with other energy dissipation materials) in the damper is active at the same time, and the working state of the energy dissipation unit cannot be adjusted according to the response of the structure under earthquake conditions. The performance of SMA is dependent on the strong seismic performance requirements of the structure. The energy dissipation capacity of SMA is usually not fully utilized during small and medium earthquakes; so, it is necessary to make full use of its value and continue to innovate to develop more rational and smarter SMA dampers.

5. Practical Engineering Applications of SMA

The vibration control of building structures can be improved by SMA reinforcement. The bell tower of the Church of San Giorgio in Trignano, Italy, was damaged in the earthquake in October 1996. Italian engineers connected pre-tensile steel bars and Ni-Ti SMA bars in series and installed them at the four corners of the bell tower to increase the structure’s resistance to lateral dynamic loads [157], as shown in Figure 17. In the earthquake of 2000, the structure showed good hysteretic properties and was not damaged. Similar SMA-based reinforcement cases for ancient buildings are the Badia Fiorentina Bell Tower in Italy and the Sherith Israel building restoration project in San Francisco, USA [158]. They were not destroyed in subsequent earthquakes and showed good hysteretic properties.
Based on reference [87], it has been proven that the combination of U-shaped Fe-SMA bars and sprayed cement mortar is effective for the shear reinforcement of T-shaped concrete beams. Shear reinforcement was carried out on the concrete beams of the renovated theater in Baden, Switzerland, with the operation steps shown in Figure 18. In addition to bending the exposed stirrups and repairing the groove after excitation, the strengthening procedure is consistent with that in the above study. The reinforcement project uses Fe-SMA stirrups to actively restrain the shear strength of concrete beams, a method which has no effect on the surface appearance of the structure after reinforcement. After the reinforcement is completed, it has no effect on the surface appearance of the structure. Moreover, because the prestress of Fe-SMA bars is generated via the metallography transformation of the material itself, there is no friction loss of prestress in the process.
The Swiss company re-fer AG conducted the world’s first application of Fe-SMA strips in the field of building reinforcement in Villigen in 2017 [159]. Due to the removal of load-bearing walls, the static bearing capacity of the building’s reinforced concrete floor needed to be enhanced. By combining the use of steel beams, Fe-SMA strips and non-prestressed CFRP strips, the defects of insufficient configuration of bending steel bars at the location of the demolished wall are addressed, and the requirements of normal use and ultimate bearing capacity are met. The arrangement of reinforcement materials is shown in Figure 19a. The company also used nail fixation Fe-SMA strip technology to control cracks in the concrete slabs of a school building in Nieppe, France [160]. The Fe-SMA strip was fixed on the concrete slabs by nails, as shown in Figure 19b, and stimulated using a resistance heating device. The crack width was reduced by 0.14 mm after prestressing was generated.

6. Conclusions and Future Works

SMA has a significant effect on improving the mechanical properties of structural components of buildings and the smart deformation control ability of cracking self-recovery. SMA-reinforced structural components can give the structure a deformation and displacement self-recovery ability; improve the working performance; and achieve satisfactory results in the application of concrete beams, columns, beam–column joints, shear walls, and slabs. With the development of SMA material research and production technology, improving the comprehensive performance of SMA while reducing costs will help promote SMA-reinforced building structures as engineering materials and promote the large-scale development of smart concrete structures.
The main conclusions from summarizing and analyzing the research of SMA in building structures are as follows:
(1)
With its unique SME and SE characteristics, SMA can achieve deformation self-recovery. Different types of SMA have different recovery performance, among which NiTi-based SMA has strong comprehensive performance and a wide range of applications. It is the most common material in building structure research, but its price is relatively high.
(2)
The effect of SMA on enhancing the mechanical properties of structural components of buildings is affected by various factors, including the diameter and reinforcement ratio of SMA prestress value, tension method, and excitation method. With different loading modes, SMA enhances the self-healing, flexural, and shear properties of beam components, as well as the deformation energy dissipation capacity of column components, beam–column joints, and shear walls.
(3)
Because of its excellent SME and SE characteristics, SMA is used in bearings and dampers in building structures to improve their mechanical properties under earthquake conditions.
Further research in this field can be carried out as follows:
(1)
The construction technology standards regarding heating in SMA activation are not yet clear. Although excessive heat can be applied to ensure sufficient activation, in concrete components, excessive heat can hinder the formation of ettringite in the concrete matrix and cause longitudinal splitting cracks. The standardized SMA heating method needs to be improved.
(2)
In order to overcome the shortcomings of brittleness and easy cracking of traditional concrete, a strong combination of SMA and ECC or UHPC should be established to study the deformation self-recovery ability of SMA-ECC/SMA-UHPC composite material components.
(3)
SMA is relatively expensive. Considering the actual situation of the building structure, it is necessary to effectively combine SMA with other composite materials (such as CERP) to achieve their complementary advantages and enhance the performance and function of shape memory composite materials.
(4)
The influence of factors such as prestressed tension and anchorage, the splicing mode, and the SME driving mode of SMA on the deformation recovery performance of SMA-reinforced structural components should be considered.
(5)
Existing studies generally use wires with a small cross-sectional area as reinforcement materials. Few studies have been conducted using large-cross-section materials, and the relevant mechanical tests are limited to scale model components. In addition, the effects of state parameters such as temperature, pretension strain, and loading frequency on the SME of SMA still lack sufficient and effective data support. The nonlinear constitutive relationship of SMA in a complex stress state or multi-directional constraint state is still to be established.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.X., M.Z. and J.Z.; software, L.X. and J.Z.; investigation, M.Z., J.Z., M.C. and M.S.; data curation, L.X. and M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.X., M.Z., J.Z. and M.S.; visualization, L.X. and M.Z.; supervision, L.X., M.C. and M.S.; project administration, L.X., J.Z. and M.C.; funding acquisition, L.X., M.C. and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52168024), the Fundamental Research Funds for Inner Mongolia University of Science & Technology (2022QNJS079, 2022RCTD021, 2022YXXS117, 2023YXXS217, 2023YXXS218), the quality and efficiency improvement project of civil engineering discipline, the Baotou City Innovation Talent Project, the Special Funds for “Grassland Talents” Project and the “Grassland Talent” Rolling Support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Review of studies on SMA-reinforced RC beams (in chronological order).
Table A1. Review of studies on SMA-reinforced RC beams (in chronological order).
FunctionStudy YearInstallation TechniqueProperty Type of LoadingResearch Method
Self-healingSakai et al. [61]-2003Internal SMA reinforcementSEThree-point cyclic bendingExperimental
Li et al. [64,65]-2007Embedded Ni-Ti wires + CFRP plateSMENot reportedExperimental + Numerical
Kuang and Ou [66]-2008Internal Ni-Ti SMA wires + adhesivesSEThree-point cyclic bendingExperimental
Xue et al. [68]-2009External installation of Ni-Ti SMA barsSMEFour-point bendingExperimental
Yang et al. [69]-2011Internal/External installation of Ni-Ti SMA barsSMEThree-point bendingExperimental
Sun et al.-2011[70]; 2013 [71]Internal/External installation of Ni-Ti SMA barsSMEThree-point bendingExperimental
Choi et al. [63]-2015Internal Ni-Ti SMA fibersSMEThree-point bendingExperimental
Lee et al. [62]-2018Internal Ni-Ti/Ni-Ti-Nb SMA fibersSMEThree-point bendingExperimental
Bonilla et al. [67]-2018Internal Ni-Ti SMA wires + microcapsulesSMEThree-point bendingExperimental
Flexural
behavior
Abdulridha et al. [81]-2013Ni-Ti rebars as top and bottom longitudinal reinforcement at mid-spanSEFour-point cyclic andreversed bendingNumerical
Shahverdi et al. [72]-2016Fe-SMA strips as NSM reinforcementSMEFour-point bendingExperimental
Shahverdi et al. [77]-2016Fe-SMA rebars embedded in a shotcrete layerSMEFour-point bendingExperimental
Hong et al. [73]-2018NSM Fe-SMA StripsSMEFour-point bendingExperimental
Rojob and El-Hacha [75]-2018NSM Fe-SMA rebarsSMEFreeze–thaw cycles and sustained loadExperimental
Rojob and El-Hacha [76]-2018NSM Fe-SMA rebarsSMECycles of fatigue loadingExperimental
Michels et al. [79]-2018Externally anchored Fe-SMA stripsSMEFour-point bendingExperimental
Strieder et al. [80]-2018Externally anchored Fe-SMA stripsSMEFour-point bendingExperimental + Numerical
Dolatabadi et al. [78]-2020Fe-SMA rebars embedded in a shotcrete layerSMEFour-point bendingNumerical
Yeon et al. [74]-2021Fe-SMA strips as NSM reinforcementSMEFour-point bendingNumerical
Hong et al. [82]-2022Fe-SMA rebars as bottom longitudinal reinforcementSMEFour-point bendingExperimental
Yeon et al. [141]-2022Fe-SMA rebars as tensile longitudinal reinforcementSMEFour-point bendingExperimental
Shear
behavior
Mas et al. [88]-2016Externally installed Ni-Ti rectangular spiralsSEThree-point cyclic bendingExperimental
Montoya-Coronado et al. [83]-2019Externally installed Fe-SMA strips as spiralsSMEThree-point bendingExperimental
Cladera et al. [84]-2020Externally installed Fe-SMA strips as spiralsSMEThree-point bendingExperimental
Ruiz-Pinilla et al. [86]-2020Externally installed Fe-SMA strips as spiralsSMEThree-point bendingNumerical + Analytical
Czaderski et al. [87]-2020U-shaped ribbed bars + cement-based mortarSMEFour-point bendingExperimental
Ji et al. [89]-2022Internal Fe-SMA stirrupsSMEFour-point bendingExperimental + Numerical
Abdulkareem et al. [85]-2023Externally installed U-shaped Fe-SMA strips as spiralsSMEFour-point bendingExperimental
Hong et al. [90]-2023Internal Fe-SMA stirrupsSMEFour-point bendingExperimental + Numerical
Table A2. Review of studies on SMA-reinforced RC columns (in chronological order).
Table A2. Review of studies on SMA-reinforced RC columns (in chronological order).
FunctionStudy YearInstallation TechniquePropertyType of LoadingResearch Method
Axial
compression property
Shin and Andrawes [92,93]-2010External NiTiNb SMA spiralsSMEUniaxial compression testExperimental
Choi et al.-2010 [94,95], 2011 [96]External NiTiNb/NiTi SMA wires/steel jacketsSMEUniaxial compression testExperimental
Chen et al. [100]-2014External SMA wires + steel tubesSMEMonotonic and cyclic loadingNumerical + Experimental
Tran et al. [97]-2015External NiTi SMA wiresSMEUniaxial compression testExperimental
Chen and Andrawes [103]-2017External NiTiNb SMA spiralsSMEUniaxial cyclic loadingExperimental + Analytical
Chen and Andrawes [104]-2017External NiTiNb SMA spiralsSMEMonotonic and cyclic loadingAnalytical + Numerical
Gholampour and Ozbakkaloglu [108]-2018External Ni-Ti SMA spiralsSMEUniaxial compressive testExperimental
Hong et al. [99]-2020External NiTi SMA wiresSEUniaxial compressive testExperimental + Analytical
Suhail et al. [101]-2020External NiTiNb SMA spirals and FRP systemsSMEUniaxial compressive testExperimental
El-Hacha and Abdelrahman [102]-2020External Ni-Ti SMA spiralsSMEUniaxial compressive testExperimental
Khaled and El-Hacha [105]-2020External SMA spiralsSMEUniaxial compressive testAnalytical
Jeong et al. [106]-2022External Fe-SMA stripsSMEUniaxial compressive testExperimental
Zerbe et al. [108]-2022External Fe-SMA stripsSMEUniaxial compressive testExperimental + Analytical
Vieira et al. [109]-2022External Fe-SMA stripsSMEUniaxial compressive testAnalytical + Numerical
Han et al. [107]-2023External Fe-SMA strips + FRPSMEUniaxial compressive testExperimental + Analytical
Seismic
performance
Shin and Andrawes [112]-2011External SMA spirals and FRP wrapsSMEQuasi-static lateral cyclic loadingExperimental
Shin and Andrawes [113]-2011External SMA spiralsSMEQuasi-static lateral cyclic loadingExperimental
Table A3. Review of studies on SMA-reinforced RC beam–column joints (in chronological order).
Table A3. Review of studies on SMA-reinforced RC beam–column joints (in chronological order).
FunctionStudy YearInstallation TechniquePropertyType of LoadingResearch Method
Seismic
performance
Youssef et al. [114]-2008Ni-Ti SMA internal reinforcement in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Experimental
Alam et al. [115]-2008Ni-Ti SMA internal reinforcement in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Analytical + Numerical
Alam et al. [116]-2009Ni-Ti SMA internal reinforcement in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Experimental + Numerical
Zafar and Andrawes [121]-2015SMA internal reinforcement in the plastic hinge region + FRPSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Numerical + Analytical
Oudah and El-Hacha [118]-2017Ni-Ti SMA internal reinforcement anchored using screw lock steel anchorsSEQuasi-static cyclic
loading
Experimental + Analytical
Oudah and El-Hacha [119]-2018Ni-Ti SMA internal reinforcement in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Experimental
Nahar et al. [117]-2019Ni-Ti SMA internal reinforcement in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Numerical + Analytical
Navarro-Gómez and Bonet [122]-2019SMA bars and ultra-high-performance concrete in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static cyclic
loading
Numerical
Pei et al. [120]-2022SMA bars and a steel plate in the core area of the jointSELow cyclic loading testExperimental + Numerical
Qian et al. [123]-2022ECC and SMA bars in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static cyclic
loading
Experimental
Qian et al. [124]-2022ECC and SMA bars in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Experimental + Numerical
Qian et al. [125]-2023ECC and SMA bars in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Experimental
Table A4. Review of studies on SMA-reinforced RC shear walls (in chronological order).
Table A4. Review of studies on SMA-reinforced RC shear walls (in chronological order).
FunctionStudy YearInstallation TechniquePropertyType of LoadingResearch Method
Seismic
performance
Ghassemieh et al.-2012 [128]; 2017 [129]Diagonal SMAs in coupling beams SEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Numerical
Abdulridha and Palermo [134]-2017Ni-Ti SMA rebars as internal longitudinal reinforcement in the plastic hinge regionsSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Experimental
Wang and Zhu [127]-2018Ni-Ti bars in the plastic hinge regionsSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Numerical
Abraik and Youssef [130]-2018SE-SMA bars in the plastic-hinge regionsSEQuasi-static cyclic
loading
Numerical
Navarro-Gómez and Palermo-2017 [133]; 2018 [132]Ni-Ti SMA rebars as external bracesSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Experimental + Numerical
Kian and Cruz-Noguez [137]-2018Ni-Ti SMA internal reinforcement in the
boundary element
SEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Experimental
Navarro-Gómez and Palermo [131]-2020Ni-Ti SMA rebars as external bracesSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Numerical
Córtes-Puentes et al. [135]-2018Ni-Ti SMA internal reinforcement in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static cyclic
loading
Experimental
Soares et al. [136]-2021Ni-Ti SMA internal reinforcement in the plastic hinge regionSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Numerical
Abraik and Assaf [138]-2021Three different types of SE-SMA in the plastic hingeSEQuasi-static cyclic
loading
Numerical
Abraik and Ateeyah [139]-2022SMA bars replacing the conventional steel bars located in the wall boundariesSEQuasi-static reversed
cyclic loading
Numerical
Tabrizikahou et al. [140]-2022Ni-Ti strips and ECC sheetsSECyclical lateral loadingNumerical

References

  1. Alexander, M.; Beushausen, H. Durability, service life prediction, and modelling for reinforced concrete structures-review and critique. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 122, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rabi, M.; Shamass, R.; Cashell, K.A. Structural performance of stainless steel reinforced concrete members: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 325, 126673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zareie, S.; Issa, A.S.; Seethaler, R.J.; Zabihollah, A. Recent advances in the applications of shape memory alloys in civil infrastructures: A review. Structures 2020, 27, 1535–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Looney, T.; Leggs, M.; Volz, J.; Floyd, R. Durability and corrosion resistance of ultra-high performance concretes for repair. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 345, 128238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, S.; Colin, D.; Saeed, M.; Babar, N.K.R.; Zhang, L. Life-cycle modelling of concrete cracking and reinforcement corrosion in concrete bridges: A case study. Eng. Struct. 2021, 237, 112143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Taffese, W.Z.; Nigussie, E.; Isoaho, J. Internet of Things based Durability Monitoring and Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Procedia Comput. 2019, 155, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Imperatore, S.; Rinaldi, Z. Cracking in Reinforced Concrete Structures Damaged by Artificial Corrosion: An Overview. Open Constr. Build. Technol. J. 2019, 13, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. GB 50352-2019; Uniform Standard for Design of Civil Buildings. China Construction Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2019.
  9. Afzal, M.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Gan, V.J.L. Reinforced concrete structural design optimization: A critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 120623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Si, J.; Wu, L.; Guo, W. Axial compression of reinforced concrete columns strengthened by composite of prestressed plastic-steel strip and angle steel: An experimental study. Struct. Concr. 2021, 22, 3620–3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ren, Z.; Shen, Y.; Zeng, X.; Sun, Y. Experimental Research on Axial Compression of Reinforced Concrete Short Circular Columns Strengthened with Prestressed Semicircular Steel Plates. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 2021, 1992084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, H.; Gan, G.; Zeng, K.; Chen, K.; Yu, X. Study on Flexural Performance of Prestressed Concrete Steel Strand Square Piles with Reinforcement. Buildings 2022, 12, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ahmed, A.A.; Hassan, M.; Masmoudi, R. Flexural Performance of Unbonded Posttensioned Rectangular Concrete Filled FRP Tube Beams. J. Compos. Constr. 2020, 24, 04020058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luchetti, T.; Zanella, A.; Biasiotto, M.; Saccagno, A. Electrically actuated antiglare rear-view mirror based on a shape memory alloy actuator. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2009, 18, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jalali, M.S.; Mahanfar, A.; Menon, C.; Vaughan, R.G. Reconfigurable axial-mode helix antennas using shape memory alloys. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 59, 1070–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mazlouman, S.J.; Mahanfar, A.; Menon, C.; Vaughan, R.G. Square ring antenna with reconfigurable patch using shape memory alloy actuation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 5627–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Leal, P.B.; Savi, M.A.; Hartl, D.J. Aero-structural optimization of shape memory alloy-based wing morphing via a class/shape transformation approach. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng. 2018, 232, 2745–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ashir, M.; Hindahl, J.; Nocke, A.; Cherif, C. Development of an adaptive morphing wing based on fiber-reinforced plastics and shape memory alloys. J. Ind. Text. 2020, 50, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, F.; Liu, L.; Lan, X.; Pan, C.; Liu, Y.; Leng, J.; Xie, Q. Ground and geostationary orbital qualification of a sunlight-stimulated substrate based on shape memory polymer composite. Smart Mater. Struct. 2019, 28, 075023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, X.; Chen, B.; Peng, X.; Jin, X.; Zheng, H. Finite Element Simulation of NiTiNb Shape Memory Alloy Pipe-Joint Subjected to Coupled Transformation and Plastic Deformation. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 2020, 6895850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seok, S.; Onal, C.D.; Cho, K.J.; Wood, R.J.; Rus, D.; Kim, S. Meshworm: A peristaltic soft robot with antagonistic nickel titanium coil actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2013, 18, 1485–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Noh, M.; Kim, S.W.; An, S.; Koh, J.S.; Cho, K.J. Flea-inspired catapult mechanism for miniature jumping robots. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2012, 28, 1007–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abbas, A.; Hung, H.Y.; Lin, P.C.; Yang, K.C.; Chen, M.C.; Lin, H.C.; Han, Y.Y. Atomic Layer Deposited TiO2 Films on an Equiatomic NiTi Shape Memory Alloy for Biomedical Applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 886, 161282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhu, Z.; Guo, D.; Xu, J.; Lin, J.; Wang, X. Processing Characteristics of Micro Electrical Discharge Machining for Surface Modification of TiNi Shape Memory Alloys Using a TiC Powder Dielectric. Micromachines 2020, 11, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, P.; Jiang, L.; Xia, D.; Wu, J.; Ye, Y.; Xu, S. Nickel-titanium arched shape-memory alloy connector combined with bone grafting in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2019, 24, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ölander, A. An electrochemical investigation of solid cadmium-gold alloys. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932, 54, 3819–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chang, L.C.; Read, T.A. Plastic deformation and diffusionless phase changes in metals the gold-cadmium beta phase. Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 1951, 47, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rachinger, W.A. A “super-elastic” single crystal calibration bar. Br. J. Appl. Phys. 1958, 9, 250–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Buehler, W.J.; Gilfrich, J.V.; Wiley, R.C. Effect of Low-Temperature Phase Changes on the Mechanical Properties of Alloys near Composition Ti Ni. J. Appl. Phys. 1963, 34, 1475–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, J.; Li, R.; Zheng, D.; Wu, H.; Wang, M.; Niu, P.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Lai, D.; Yuan, T. Unconventional precipitation and martensitic transformation behaviour of Ni-rich NiTi alloy fabricated via laser-directed energy deposition. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2023, 18, e2231415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Santhanam, R.; Krishna, Y.; Sivakumar, M.S. Behaviour of NiTi SMA Helical Springs under Different Temperatures and Deflections. ISRN Mater. Sci. 2013, 2013, 320370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Savage, S.J. Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys. Surf. Eng. 2013, 7, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Suhail, R.; Amato, G.; McCrum, D. Heat-activated prestressing of NiTiNb shape memory alloy wires. Eng. Struct. 2020, 206, 110128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Prader, P.; Kneissl, A.C. Deformation Behaviour and Two-way Shape Memory Effect of NiTi Alloys. Int. J. Mater. Res. 2021, 88, 410–415. [Google Scholar]
  35. Waitz, T.; Kazykhanov, V.; Karnthaler, H.P. Martensitic phase transformations in nanocrystalline NiTi studied by TEM. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.; Li, C.; Verlinden, B.; Humbeeck, J.V. Effect of grain size on aging microstructure as reflected in the transformation behavior of a low-temperature aged Ti-50.8 at.% Ni alloy. Scr. Mater. 2013, 69, 545–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kurita, T.; Matsumoto, H.; Sakamoto, K.; Tanji, K.; Abe, H. Effect of aluminum addition on the transformation of NiTi alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 396, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vickers, N.J. Animal communication: When I’m calling you, will you answer too? Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R713–R715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yoshida, I.; Monma, D.; Iino, K.; Otsuka, K.; Asai, M.; Tsuzuki, H. Damping properties ofTi50Ni50-xCux alloys utilizing martensitic transformation. J. Alloys Comp. 2003, 355, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yin, Y.; Xu, Y.T.; Shen, J.; Xia, T. Review on the Research Status of Ternary NiTi Shape Memory Alloy. Mater. Rev. 2006, 25, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
  41. Raza, S.S.; Ahmad, T.; Kamran, M.; Zhang, X.H.; Basit, M.A.; Manzoor, M.U.; Inam, A.; Butt, O.M.; Abrar, M. Effect of hot rolling on microstructures and mechanical properties of Ni base superalloy. Vacuum 2020, 174, 109204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bigelow, G.S.; Padula, S.A.; Gray, A.; Gaydosh, D.; Noebe, R.D. Characterization of Ternary NiTiPd High Temperature Shape-Memory Alloys under Load-Biased Thermal Cycling. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2010, 41, 3065–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Firstov, G.S.; Humbeeck, J.V.; Koval, Y.N. High-temperature shape memory alloys: Some recent developments. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 378, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Miao, J.; Zhao, L. Characterization of a nanocrystalline NiTiHf high temperature shape memory alloy thin film. Scr. Mater. 2005, 52, 983–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, Y.Y.; Yao, X.Y.; Cao, S.S.; Ma, X.; Ke, C.B.; Zhang, X.P. Rapidly solidified and optimally constraint-aged Ni51Ti49 shape memory alloy aiming at making a purpose-designed bio-actuator. Mater. Des. 2017, 118, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sun, L.; Huang, W.M. Nature of the multistage transformation in shape memory alloys upon heating. Met. Sci. Heat Treat 2009, 51, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bowers, M.L.; Gao, Y.; Yang, L.; Gaydosh, D.J.; De Graef, M.; Noebe, R.D.; Wang, Y.; Mills, M.J. Austenite grain refinement during load-biased thermal cycling of a Ni 49.9 Ti 50.1 shape memory alloy. Acta Mater. 2015, 91, 318–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Junwon, S.; Young, K.; Jong, H. Pilot Study for Investigating the Cyclic Behavior of Slit Damper Systems with Recentering Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) Bending Bars Used for Seismic Restrainers. Appl. Sci. 2015, 5, 187–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Saedi, S.; Turabi, A.S.; Andani, M.T.; Haberland, C.; Karaca, H.; Elahinia, M. The influence of heat treatment on the thermomechanical response of Ni-rich NiTi alloys manufactured by selective laser melting. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 677, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hu, Z.; Gao, S.; Zhang, L.; Shen, X.; Seet, H.L.; Nai, S.M.L.; Wei, J. Micro laser powder bed fusion of stainless steel 316L: Cellular structure, grain characteristics, and mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2022, 848, 143345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, S.K.; Lin, H.C. Damping characteristics of TiNi binary and temary shape memory alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2003, 355, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hsieh, S.F.; Wu, S.K. Damping characteristics of a Ti40.5Ni49.5Zr10 shape memory alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 403, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kaya, E.; Kaya, İ. A review on machining of NiTi shape memory alloys: The process and post process perspective. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 100, 2045–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kumar, S.S.; Arohi, A.C.; Sen, I. A Review on Micro-mechanical Testing of NiTi-Based Shape Memory Alloys. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 2022, 102, 211–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mazzer, E.M.; da Silva, M.R.; Gargarella, P. Revisiting Cu-based shape memory alloys: Recent developments and new perspectives. J. Mater. Res. 2022, 37, 162–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tabrizikahou, A.; Kuczma, M.; Łasecka-Plura, M.; Noroozinejad, F.E.; Noori, M.; Gardoni, P.; Li, S. Application and modelling of Shape-Memory Alloys for structural vibration control: State-of-the-art review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 342, 127975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qiang, X.; Chen, L.; Jiang, X. Achievements and Perspectives on Fe-Based Shape Memory Alloys for Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Bridges: An Overview. Materials 2022, 15, 8089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Molod, M.A.; Spyridis, P.; Barthold, F.J. Applications of shape memory alloys in structural engineering with a focus on concrete construction-A comprehensive review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 337, 127565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Janke, L.; Czaderski, C.; Motavalli, M.; Ruth, J. Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures-Overview, limits and new ideas. Mater. Struct. 2005, 38, 578–592. [Google Scholar]
  60. Billah, A.M.; Rahman, J.; Zhang, Q. Shape memory alloys (SMAs) for resilient bridges: A state-of-the-art review. Structures 2022, 37, 514–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sakai, Y.; Kitagawa, Y.; Fukuta, T.; Iiba, M. Experimental study on enhancement of self-restoration of concrete beams using SMA wire. In Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Smart Systems and Nondestructive Evaluation for Civil Infrastructures, San Diego, CA, USA, 2 March 2003. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lee, K.J.; Lee, J.H.; Jung, C.Y.; Choi, E. Crack-closing performance of NiTi and NiTiNb fibers in cement mortar beams using shape memory effects. Compos. Struct. 2018, 202, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Choi, E.; Kim, D.J.; Chung, Y.S.; Kim, H.S.; Jung, C. Crack-closing of cement mortar beams using NiTi cold-drawn SMA short fibers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24, 015018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Ou, J. Experimental study of a simple reinforced concrete beam temporarily strengthened by SMA wires followed by permanent strengthening with CFRP plates. Eng. Struct. 2007, 30, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Ou, J. Study on reinforced concrete beams strengthened using shape memory alloy wires in combination with carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer plates. Smart Mater. Struct. 2007, 16, 2550–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kuang, Y.; Ou, J. Self-repairing performance of concrete beams strengthened using superelastic SMA wires in combination with adhesives released from hollow fibers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2008, 17, 025020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bonilla, L.; Hassan, M.M.; Noorvand, H.; Rupnow, T.; Okeil, A. Dual self-healing mechanisms with microcapsules and shape memory alloys in reinforced concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04017277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xue, W.C.; Liu, Z.Y.; Zhou, L.L.; Luo, Z.W. Experimental study on active control of intelligent prestressed beams based on SMA. J. Civ. Eng. 2009, 42, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yang, Q.P.; Sun, L.; Feng, Y.Z. Experiment of Beam Crack Repair Using Shape Memory Alloy. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2011, 1366, 1707–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sun, L.; Huang, W.M.; Lim, C.K.; Ding, Z.; Purnawali, H. Crack Closure and Shape Restoration Using NiTi Shape-Memory Alloy. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 1278, 721–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sun, L.; Liang, D.; Gao, Q.; Zhou, J. Analysis on Factors Affecting the Self-Repair Capability of SMA Wire Concrete Beam. Math. Probl. Eng. 2013, 2013, 138162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shahverdi, M.; Czaderski, C.; Motavalli, M. Iron-based shape memory alloys for prestressed near-surface mounted strengthening of reinforced concrete beams. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 112, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hong, K.; Lee, S.; Yeon, Y.; Jung, K. Flexural Response of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with Near-Surface-Mounted Fe-Based Shape-Memory Alloy Strips. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2018, 12, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yeon, Y.M.; Hong, K.N.; Lee, S.; Ji, S.W. Numerical Study of RC Beams Strengthened with Fe-Based Shape Memory Alloy Strips Using the NSM Method. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rojob, H.; El-Hacha, R. Performance of RC beams strengthened with self-prestressed Fe-SMA bars exposed to freeze-thaw cycles and sustained load. Eng. Struct. 2018, 169, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rojob, H.; El-Hacha, R. Fatigue performance of RC beams strengthened with self-prestressed iron-based shape memory alloys. Eng. Struct. 2018, 168, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shahverdi, M.; Czaderski, C.; Annen, P.; Motavalli, M. Strengthening of RC beams by iron-based shape memory alloy bars embedded in a shotcrete layer. Eng. Struct. 2016, 117, 63–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dolatabadi, N.; Shahverdi, M.; Ghassemieh, M.; Motavalli, M. RC Structures Strengthened by an Iron-Based Shape Memory Alloy Embedded in a Shotcrete Layer-Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling. Materials 2020, 13, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Michels, J.; Shahverdi, M.; Czaderski, C. Flexural strengthening of structural concrete with iron-based shape memory alloy strips. Struct. Concr. 2018, 19, 876–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Strieder, E.; Aigner, C.; Petautschnig, G.; Horm, S.; Marcon, M.; Schwenn, M. Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Externally Mounted Sequentially Activated Iron-Based Shape Memory Alloys. Materials 2019, 12, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Abdulridha, A.; Palermo, D.; Foo, S.; Vecchio, F.J. Behavior and modeling of superelastic shape memory alloy reinforced concrete beams. Eng. Struct. 2013, 49, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hong, K.N.; Yeon, Y.M.; Ji, S.W.; Lee, S. Flexural Behavior of RC Beams Using Fe-Based Shape Memory Alloy Rebars as Tensile Reinforcement. Buildings 2022, 12, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Montoya-Coronado, L.A.; Ruiz-Pinilla, J.G.; Ribas, C.; Cladera, A. Experimental study on shear strengthening of shear critical RC beams using iron-based shape memory alloy strips. Eng. Struct. 2019, 200, 109680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cladera, A.; Montoya-Coronado, L.A.; Ruiz-Pinilla, J.G.; Ribas, C. Shear strengthening of slender reinforced concrete T-shaped beams using iron-based shape memory alloy strips. Eng. Struct. 2020, 221, 111018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Abdulkareem, Z.; Oukaili, N.; Al-Mahaidi, R. Shear capacity investigation of RC concrete beams using self-prestressing Fe-based shape memory alloys strips. Results Eng. 2023, 18, 101204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ruiz-Pinilla, J.G.; Montoya-Coronado, L.A.; Ribas, C.; Cladera, A. Finite element modeling of RC beams externally strengthened with iron-based shape memory alloy (Fe-SMA) strips, including analytical stress-strain curves for Fe-SMA. Eng. Struct. 2020, 223, 111152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Czaderski, C.; Shahverdi, M.; Michels, J. Iron based shape memory alloys as shear reinforcement for bridge girders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 274, 121793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mas, B.; Cladera, A.; Ribas, C. Experimental study on concrete beams reinforced with pseudoelastic Ni-Ti continuous rectangular spiral reinforcement failing in shear. Eng. Struct. 2016, 127, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ji, S.W.; Yeon, Y.M.; Hong, K.N. Shear Performance of RC Beams Reinforced with Fe-Based Shape Memory Alloy Stirrups. Materials 2022, 15, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hong, K.N.; Ji, S.W.; Yeon, Y.M. Predicting the shear behavior of reinforced concrete beams with Fe-Based shape memory alloy stirrups. Eng. Struct. 2023, 293, 116644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Andrawes, B.; Shin, M. Seismic retrofitting of bridge columns using shape memory alloys. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on: Smart Structures and Materials and Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, CA, USA, 9 March 2008. [Google Scholar]
  92. Shin, M.; Andrawes, B. Experimental investigation of actively confined concrete using shape memory alloys. Eng. Struct. 2010, 32, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Andrawes, B.; Shin, M.; Wierschem, N. Active Confinement of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Using Shape Memory Alloys. J. Bridge Eng. 2010, 15, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Choi, E.; Chung, Y.S.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, H.T.; Lee, H. The confining effectiveness of NiTiNb and NiTi SMA wire jackets for concrete. Smart Mater. Struct. 2010, 19, 035024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Choi, E.; Park, J.; Nam, T.H.; Yoon, S.J. A new steel jacketing method for RC columns. Mag. Concr. Res. 2009, 61, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Park, J.; Choi, E.; Park, K.; Kim, H.T. Comparing the cyclic behavior of concrete cylinders confined by shape memory alloy wire or steel jackets. Smart Mater. Struct. 2011, 20, 094008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tran, H.; Balandraud, X.; Destrebecq, J.F. Improvement of the mechanical performances of concrete cylinders confined actively or passively by means of SMA wires. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2015, 15, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gholampour, A.; Ozbakkaloglu, T. Understanding the compressive behavior of shape memory alloy (SMA)-confined normal- and high-strength concrete. Compos. Struct. 2018, 202, 943–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hong, C.; Qian, H.; Song, G. Uniaxial Compressive Behavior of Concrete Columns Confined with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy Wires. Materials 2020, 13, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Chen, Q.; Shin, M.; Andrawes, B. Experimental study of non-circular concrete elements actively confined with shape memory alloy wires. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 61, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Suhail, R.; Amato, G.; McCrum, D.P. Active and passive confinement of shape modified low strength concrete columns using SMA and FRP systems. Compos. Struct. 2020, 251, 112649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. El-Hacha, R.; Abdelrahman, K. Behaviour of circular SMA-confined reinforced concrete columns subjected to eccentric loading. Eng. Struct. 2020, 215, 110443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chen, Q.; Andrawes, B. Cyclic Stress-Strain Behavior of Concrete Confined with NiTiNb-Shape Memory Alloy Spirals. J. Struct. Eng. 2017, 143, 04017008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chen, Q.; Andrawes, B. Plasticity Modeling of Concrete Confined with NiTiNb Shape Memory Alloy Spirals. Structures 2017, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Abdelrahman, K.; El-Hacha, R. Analytical prediction model for circular SMA-confined reinforced concrete columns. Eng. Struct. 2020, 213, 110547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jeong, S.; Kim, K.H.E.; Lee, Y.; Yoo, D.; Hong, K.; Jumg, D. Compressive behavior of concrete confined with iron-based shape memory alloy strips. Earthq. Struct. 2022, 23, 431–444. [Google Scholar]
  107. Han, T.; Dong, Z.; Zhu, H.; Wu, G.; Zhao, X. Compression behavior of concrete columns combinedly confined by FRP externally wrapped Fe-SMA strips. Eng. Struct. 2023, 294, 116754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zerbe, L.; Vieira, D.; Belarbi, A.; Senouci, A. Uniaxial compressive behavior of circular concrete columns actively confined with Fe-SMA strips. Eng. Struct. 2022, 255, 113878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Vieira, D.; Zerbe, L.; Belarbi, A. Numerical modeling of iron-based SMA confined concrete columns under axial compressive loading. Eng. Struct. 2023, 275, 115185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shin, M.; Andrawes, B. Cyclic behavior of concrete bridge columns retrofitted with innovative spirals. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on: Smart Structures and Materials and Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, CA, USA, 9 March 2008. [Google Scholar]
  111. Andrawes, B.; Shin, M. Experimental investigation of concrete columns wrapped with shape memory alloy spirals. In Proceedings of the ATC and SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures, San Francisco, CA, USA, 9–11 December 2009. [Google Scholar]
  112. Shin, M.; Andrawes, B. Lateral Cyclic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns Retrofitted with Shape Memory Spirals and FRP Wraps. J. Struct. Eng. 2011, 137, 1282–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Shin, M.; Andrawes, B. Emergency repair of severely damaged reinforced concrete columns using active confinement with shape memory alloys. Smart Mater. Struct. 2011, 20, 065018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Youssef, M.A.; Alam, M.S.; Nehdi, M. Experimental Investigation on the Seismic Behavior of Beam-Column Joints Reinforced with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloys. J. Earthq. Eng. 2008, 12, 1205–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Alam, M.S.; Youssef, M.A.; Nehdi, M. Analytical prediction of the seismic behaviour of superelastic shape memory alloy reinforced concrete elements. Eng. Struct. 2008, 30, 3399–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Alam, M.S.; Nehdi, M.; Youssef, M.A. Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys. Smart Struct. Syst. 2009, 5, 565–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Nahar, M.; Billah, A.H.H.M.; Kamal, H.R.; Islam, K. Numerical seismic performance evaluation of concrete beam-column joint reinforced with different super elastic shape memory alloy rebars. Eng. Struct. 2019, 194, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Oudah, F.; El-Hacha, R. Joint performance in concrete beam-column connections reinforced using SMA smart material. Eng. Struct. 2017, 151, 745–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Oudah, F.; El-Hacha, R. Innovative Self-Centering Concrete Beam-Column Connection Reinforced Using Shape Memory Alloy. ACI Struct. J. 2018, 115, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Pei, Q.; Wu, C.; Cheng, Z.; Ding, Y.; Guo, H. The Seismic Performance of New Self-Centering Beam-Column Joints of Conventional Island Main Buildings in Nuclear Power Plants. Materials 2022, 15, 1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Zafar, A.; Andrawes, B. Seismic behavior of SMA–FRP reinforced concrete frames under sequential seismic hazard. Eng. Struct. 2015, 98, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Navarro-Gómez, A.; Bonet, J.L. Improving the seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames by means of SMA bars and ultra-high performance concrete. Eng. Struct. 2019, 197, 109409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Qian, H.; Ye, Y.; Yan, C.; Jin, G.; Li, C.; Shi, Y. Experimental study on the seismic performance of self-centering bridge piers incorporating ECC and superelastic SMA bars in the plastic hinge regions. Structures 2022, 46, 1955–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Qian, H.; Li, Z.; Pei, J.; Kang, L.; Li, H. Seismic performance of self-centering beam-column joints reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloy bars and engineering cementitious composites materials. Compos. Struct. 2022, 294, 115782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Qian, H.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. Experimental study on re-centering behavior and energy dissipation capacity of prefabricated concrete frame joints with shape memory alloy bars and engineered cementitious composites. Eng. Struct. 2023, 277, 115394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Thomsen, J.H.; Wallace, J.W. Displacement-Based Design of Slender Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls-Experimental Verification. J. Struct. Eng. 2004, 130, 618–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wang, B.; Zhu, S. Seismic behavior of self-centering reinforced concrete wall enabled by superelastic shape memory alloy bars. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2018, 16, 479–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ghassemieh, M.; Bahaari, M.R.; Ghodratian, S.M.; Nojoumi, S.A. Improvement of Concrete Shear Wall Structures by Smart Materials. Open J. Civ. Eng. 2012, 2, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ghassemieh, M.; Rezapour, M.; Sadeghi, V. Effectiveness of the shape memory alloy reinforcement in concrete coupled shear walls. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2017, 28, 640–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Abraik, E.; Youssef, M.A. Seismic fragility assessment of superelastic shape memory alloy reinforced concrete shear walls. J. Build. Eng. 2018, 19, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Cortés-Puentes, W.L.; Palermo, D. Modeling of Concrete Shear Walls Retrofitted with SMA Tension Braces. J. Earthq. Eng. 2020, 24, 555–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Cortés-Puentes, W.L.; Palermo, D. Seismic Retrofit of Concrete Shear Walls with SMA Tension Braces. J. Struct. Eng. 2018, 144, 4017200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Cortés-Puentes, W.L.; Palermo, D. SMA tension brace for retrofitting concrete shear walls. Eng. Struct. 2017, 140, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Abdulridha, A.; Palermo, D. Behaviour and modelling of hybrid SMA-steel reinforced concrete slender shear wall. Eng. Struct. 2017, 147, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Cortés-Puentes, W.L.; Zaidi, M.; Palermo, D.; Dragomirescu, E. Cyclic loading testing of repaired SMA and steel reinforced concrete shear walls. Eng. Struct. 2018, 168, 128–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Soares, M.M.; Palermo, D.; Cortés-Puentes, W.L. Modelling of mid-rise concrete shear walls reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys: Nonlinear analysis. Eng. Struct. 2021, 247, 113049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kian, M.J.T.; Cruz-Noguez, C. Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls Detailed with Innovative Materials: Seismic Performance. J. Compos. Constr. 2018, 22, 4018052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Abraik, E.; Assaf, J. Impact of ground motion duration on concrete shear walls reinforced with different types of shape memory alloy rebars. Structures 2021, 33, 2739–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Abraik, E.; Ateeyah, J. Parametric analysis of slotted concrete shear walls reinforced with shape memory alloy bars. Case Stud. Constr. Mat. 2022, 16, e00806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Tabrizikahou, A.; Kuczma, M.; Łasecka-Plura, M.; Farsangi, E.N. Cyclic Behavior of Masonry Shear Walls Retrofitted with Engineered Cementitious Composite and Pseudoelastic Shape Memory Alloy. Sensors 2022, 22, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Yeon, Y.M.; Hong, K.N.; Ji, S.W. Flexural Behavior of Self-Prestressed RC Slabs with Fe-Based Shape Memory Alloy Rebar. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Morales-Beltran, M.; Paul, J. Technical Note: Active and Semi-Active Strategies to Control Building Structures Under Large Earthquake Motion. J. Earthq. Eng. 2015, 19, 1086–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. GB 50011-2010; Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. China Construction Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2010.
  144. Gjorgjiev, I.; Garevski, M. A polynomial analytical model of rubber bearings based on series of tests. Eng. Struct. 2013, 56, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Dezfuli, F.H.; Alam, M.S. Shape memory alloy wire-based smart natural rubber bearing. Smart Mater. Struct. 2013, 22, 045013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Dezfuli, F.H.; Alam, M.S. Hysteresis model of shape memory alloy wire-based laminated rubber bearing under compression and unidirectional shear loadings. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24, 065022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Li, S.; Dezfuli, F.H.; Alam, M.S.; Wang, J.Q. Design, manufacturing, and performance evaluation of a novel smart roller bearing equipped with shape memory alloy wires. Smart Mater. Struct. 2022, 31, 025032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Seo, J.; Hu, J.W. Seismic Response and Performance Evaluation of Self-Centering LRB Isolators Installed on the CBF Building under NF Ground Motions. Sustainability 2016, 8, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zheng, Y.; Dong, Y.; Li, Y. Resilience and life-cycle performance of smart bridges with shape memory alloy (SMA)-cable-based bearings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 158, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Cao, S.; Ozbulut, O.E.; Shi, F.; Deng, J. Experimental and numerical investigations on hysteretic response of a multi-level SMA/lead rubber bearing seismic isolation system. Smart Mater. Struct. 2022, 31, 035024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, W.; Fang, C.; Zhang, A.; Liu, X. Manufacturing and performance of a novel self-centring damper with shape memory alloy ring springs for seismic resilience. Struct. Control. Health Monit. 2019, 26, e2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhang, S.; Hou, H.; Qu, B.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, X. Tests of a novel re-centering damper with SMA rods and friction wedges. Eng. Struct. 2021, 236, 112125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Chen, J.; Wang, W.; Fang, C. Manufacturing, testing and simulation of novel SMA-based variable friction dampers with enhanced deformability. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 45, 103513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Sheikhi, J.; Fathi, M.; Rahnavard, R.; Napolitano, R. Numerical analysis of natural rubber bearing equipped with steel and shape memory alloys dampers. Structures 2021, 32, 1839–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Asgarian, B.; Salari, N.; Saadati, B. Application of Intelligent Passive Devices Based on Shape Memory Alloys in Seismic Control of Structures. Structures 2016, 5, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mirzai, N.M.; Mansouri, I.; Tezcan, J.; Awoyera, P.O.; Hu, J.W. Estimating optimum parameters of a new SMA damper under different earthquake ground motions. Structures 2021, 33, 2700–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Indirli, M.; Castellano, M.G.; Clemente, P.; Martelli, A. Demo-Application of Shape Memory Alloy Devices: The Rehabilitation of the S. Giorgio Church Bell Tower. In Proceedings of the SPIE SPIE’s 8th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 4 March 2001. [Google Scholar]
  158. Alsaleh, R.; Casciati, F.; EL-Attar, A.; El-Habbal, I. Experimental validation of a shape memory alloy retrofitting application. J. Vib. Control 2012, 18, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Schranz, B.; Michels, J.; Shahverdi, M.; Czaderski, C. Strengthening of concrete structures with iron-based shape memory alloy elements: Case studies. In Proceedings of the SMAR 2019-Fifth Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures, Potsdam, Berlin, Germany, 26 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  160. Fritsch, E.; Izadi, M.; Ghafoori, E. Development of nail-anchor strengthening system with iron-based shape memory alloy (Fe-SMA) strips. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 229, 117042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Applications of SMA in various fields.
Figure 1. Applications of SMA in various fields.
Materials 17 02634 g001
Figure 2. Applications of SMA in building structures: (a) SMA-reinforced beam–column joints; (b) SMA-reinforced shear walls; (c) SMA-reinforced slabs; (d) SMA damping energy dissipation components; (e) SMA-reinforced columns; (f) self-healing of SMA beams; (g) SMA bending-reinforced beams; (h) SMA shear-reinforced beams.
Figure 2. Applications of SMA in building structures: (a) SMA-reinforced beam–column joints; (b) SMA-reinforced shear walls; (c) SMA-reinforced slabs; (d) SMA damping energy dissipation components; (e) SMA-reinforced columns; (f) self-healing of SMA beams; (g) SMA bending-reinforced beams; (h) SMA shear-reinforced beams.
Materials 17 02634 g002
Figure 3. Research on the application of SMA in various components of building structures from 2003 to 2023.
Figure 3. Research on the application of SMA in various components of building structures from 2003 to 2023.
Materials 17 02634 g003
Figure 4. SMA phase transition process: (a) schematic diagram of shape memory alloy microstructure phase transition; (b) martensite volume percentage and temperature diagram.
Figure 4. SMA phase transition process: (a) schematic diagram of shape memory alloy microstructure phase transition; (b) martensite volume percentage and temperature diagram.
Materials 17 02634 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of SMA characteristics: (a) SME; (b) SE.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of SMA characteristics: (a) SME; (b) SE.
Materials 17 02634 g005
Figure 6. Comparison between common building materials and different types of SMA (adapted from [60]).
Figure 6. Comparison between common building materials and different types of SMA (adapted from [60]).
Materials 17 02634 g006
Figure 7. Application of SMA in various aspects of building structures.
Figure 7. Application of SMA in various aspects of building structures.
Materials 17 02634 g007
Figure 8. Two installation techniques for self-healing of SMA in concrete beams: (a) internal: replacement of tension reinforcement; (b) external: fixing with anchors in the tensile zone of the beam.
Figure 8. Two installation techniques for self-healing of SMA in concrete beams: (a) internal: replacement of tension reinforcement; (b) external: fixing with anchors in the tensile zone of the beam.
Materials 17 02634 g008
Figure 9. Repair performance of SMA concrete beams: (a) changes in cracks before and after repair of SMA beams [63]; (b) a smart concrete beam with a self-healing function [66].
Figure 9. Repair performance of SMA concrete beams: (a) changes in cracks before and after repair of SMA beams [63]; (b) a smart concrete beam with a self-healing function [66].
Materials 17 02634 g009
Figure 12. Anchorage methods of SMA-reinforced concrete column: (a) U-shaped clamp connection [92]; (b) drilling hole anchoring at both ends of the strip [108]; (c) U-shaped clamp anchoring fixed to the concrete column [102]; (d) 3 mm stainless steel threaded rod connection [101]; (e) rivet drilling [107].
Figure 12. Anchorage methods of SMA-reinforced concrete column: (a) U-shaped clamp connection [92]; (b) drilling hole anchoring at both ends of the strip [108]; (c) U-shaped clamp anchoring fixed to the concrete column [102]; (d) 3 mm stainless steel threaded rod connection [101]; (e) rivet drilling [107].
Materials 17 02634 g012
Figure 15. SMA bearings: (a) SMA-laminated rubber bearings with straight and cross arrangements [145]; (b) SMA-laminated rubber bearings with double cross arrangement [146]; (c) schematic diagram of LRB model with SMA bending rod [148]; (d) SMA friction sliding bearing [149].
Figure 15. SMA bearings: (a) SMA-laminated rubber bearings with straight and cross arrangements [145]; (b) SMA-laminated rubber bearings with double cross arrangement [146]; (c) schematic diagram of LRB model with SMA bending rod [148]; (d) SMA friction sliding bearing [149].
Materials 17 02634 g015
Figure 16. Various SMA dampers: (a) self-resetting damper [151]; (b) wedge damper [152]; (c) SMA-based variable friction damper [153]; (d) U-shaped damper [154].
Figure 16. Various SMA dampers: (a) self-resetting damper [151]; (b) wedge damper [152]; (c) SMA-based variable friction damper [153]; (d) U-shaped damper [154].
Materials 17 02634 g016
Figure 17. SMA application of San Giorgio Church in Italy [157].
Figure 17. SMA application of San Giorgio Church in Italy [157].
Materials 17 02634 g017
Figure 18. Process of active shear strengthening concrete beams with Fe-SMA stirrups: (a) installation and fixation of Fe-SMA stirrups; (b) energized excitation of Fe-SMA stirrups; (c) post-excitation trimming.
Figure 18. Process of active shear strengthening concrete beams with Fe-SMA stirrups: (a) installation and fixation of Fe-SMA stirrups; (b) energized excitation of Fe-SMA stirrups; (c) post-excitation trimming.
Materials 17 02634 g018
Figure 19. Fe-SMA-reinforced concrete slabs: (a) reinforcement example after removal of load-bearing wall [160]; (b) crack control of concrete slabs [160].
Figure 19. Fe-SMA-reinforced concrete slabs: (a) reinforcement example after removal of load-bearing wall [160]; (b) crack control of concrete slabs [160].
Materials 17 02634 g019
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; Zhu, M.; Zhao, J.; Chen, M.; Shi, M. The Utilization of Shape Memory Alloy as a Reinforcing Material in Building Structures: A Review. Materials 2024, 17, 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112634

AMA Style

Xu L, Zhu M, Zhao J, Chen M, Shi M. The Utilization of Shape Memory Alloy as a Reinforcing Material in Building Structures: A Review. Materials. 2024; 17(11):2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Lidan, Miaomiao Zhu, Jitao Zhao, Ming Chen, and Mingfang Shi. 2024. "The Utilization of Shape Memory Alloy as a Reinforcing Material in Building Structures: A Review" Materials 17, no. 11: 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop