Next Article in Journal
Improved Biocompatibility and Osseointegration of Nanostructured Calcium-Incorporated Titanium Implant Surface Treatment (XPEED®)
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Rhenium Content on Helium Desorption Behavior in Tungsten–Rhenium Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure and Texture Evolution of Cu-Ni-P Alloy after Cold Rolling and Annealing
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of Cavitation Erosion on Pumps and Valves in Nuclear Power Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorption Behavior of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+, and I by Corrosion Products α-FeOOH from Typical Metal Tanks

China Nuclear Power Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(11), 2706; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112706
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 23 May 2024 / Accepted: 28 May 2024 / Published: 3 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Key Materials in Nuclear Reactors)

Abstract

:
Throughout the nuclear power production process, the disposal of radioactive waste has consistently raised concerns about environmental safety. When the metal tanks used for waste disposal are corroded, radionuclides seep into the groundwater environment and eventually into the biosphere, causing significant damage to the environment. Hence, investigating the adsorption behavior of radionuclides on the corrosion products of metal tanks used for waste disposal is an essential component of safety and evaluation protocols at disposal sites. In order to understand the adsorption behavior of important radionuclides 60Co, 59Ni, 90Sr, 135Cs and 129I on α-FeOOH, the influences of different pH values, contact time, temperature and ion concentration on the adsorption rate were studied. The adsorption mechanism was also discussed. It was revealed that the adsorption of key nuclides onto α-FeOOH is significantly influenced by both pH and temperature. This change in surface charge corresponds to alterations in the morphology of nuclide ions within the system, subsequently impacting the adsorption efficiency. Sodium ions (Na+) and chlorate ions (ClO3) compete for coordination with nuclide ions, thereby exerting an additional influence on the adsorption process. The XPS analysis results demonstrate the formation of an internal coordination bond (Ni–O bond) between Ni2+ and iron oxide, which is adsorbed onto α-FeOOH.

1. Introduction

Due to the widespread use of nuclear energy worldwide, the management and disposal of hazardous spent fuel and radioactive waste have become significant environmental concerns [1]. Geological disposal is internationally acknowledged as the preferred approach for the long-term management of high level radioactive waste (HLW) [2,3,4,5]. In the disposal repository, multi physical barriers are designed to prevent the release of radionuclides, such as the HLW glass solidified body, the HLW disposal tank, the buffer/backfill material, and the surrounding rock of the repository. For the HLW disposal tank, it is mostly made by carbon steel, copper, stainless steels, titanium alloys or nickel alloys [6]. Within the multi-barrier system designed for the deep geological disposal of HLW, the metal container located near the buffer/backfill material serves as the initial barrier, isolating HLW from the biosphere. Its operational lifespan symbolizes the entire journey from geological disposal to the corrosion damage of HLW [7,8,9,10]. However, during the long-term waste treatment process, the HLW disposal tank may fail due to corrosion caused by groundwater infiltration into the storage. At this time, the corrosion layer of iron containers should be a key barrier to control and delay the migration of radionuclides [11]. When metal tanks used for waste disposal corrode, allowing local water to penetrate, radionuclides slowly dissolve from the waste matrix. They then migrate through the buffer layer and lithosphere via processes such as advection, dispersion, and diffusion, ultimately entering the biosphere. The radionuclides mitigation can lead to significant environmental harm [3]. Therefore, the investigating of radionuclide adsorption behavior onto corrosion products from metal tanks used in waste disposal is an essential component of safety and evaluation practices at disposal sites. Corrosion products commonly found in metal tanks include white rust (Fe(OH)2), magnetite (Fe3O4), goethite (α-FeOOH), and denser hematite (α-Fe2O3), with their formation progressing from the inner to the outer layers [12]. α-FeOOH, being one of the most stable iron oxides, has received considerable attention in the realm of soil and water quality remediation [13,14]. α-FeOOH is the most common iron hydroxide found in nature. It possesses a large specific surface area, numerous active sites, variable surface charges, and is relatively easy to synthesize in a laboratory [15,16]. Furthermore, it exhibits a particularly high affinity for a wide range of anions [17,18] and cations [1,19,20].
Radionuclides as 60Co, 59Ni, 90Sr, 135Cs, 129I, 233U, and 99Tc, characterized by their long half-lives and ease of diffusion mechanisms, can infiltrate organisms through water, soil, animals, and plants, persist for extended periods, and pose a threat to human health as they enter the food chain [21,22]. Co2+ can induce neurotoxicological diseases and genotoxicity in humans, and chronic exposure can increase the risk of cancer [23]. The radionuclide 63Ni (with a half-life of 96 years) is a significant byproduct of neutron activation in reactor materials, and the investigation of Ni2+ is essential for assessing the behavior of 63Ni in the environment [24]. Sr2+ is a highly toxic radionuclide that readily infiltrates the skeletal systems of organisms, leading to radiation damage [25]. Cs+ and I nuclides are pervasive in the Earth’s environment, entering the human body through the food chain and posing significant threats to the biosphere [26]. Previous studies have shown that the adsorption of Ni2+ by α-FeOOH was positively responsive to the increase in the amount, time and temperature of the adsorbent. The adsorption behavior of Ni2+ on the α-FeOOH (0 1 0) plane simulated by Molecular Dynamics (MD) shows that NiCl2 concentration is highest in the 30–40 Å region [27]. At low pH, the adsorption of Co2+ by α-FeOOH is dependent on ionic strength and foreign ions, while at high pH, the adsorption is independent of ionic strength and foreign ions. In addition, the presence of FA promotes the adsorption of Co2+ to α-FeOOH at low pH, but inhibits the adsorption of Co2+ to α-FeOOH at high pH [15]. The EXAFS data showed that the inner-sphere complexes with goethite at alkaline conditions and the outer-sphere complexes at moderate pH [28,29]. Based on the analysis of ion exchange mechanism, the higher the pH value, the higher the adsorption efficiency of iron oxides α-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 on 60Co, 90Sr and 137Cs. Regardless of oxidation properties, the absorption characteristics of 60Co are the best, and the absorption characteristics of 137Cs are the worst, forming an arrangement of 60Co > 90Sr > 137Cs [30].
In conclusion, the adsorption of radionuclides by iron oxides has great potential. In addition, there are few studies on the adsorption behavior of nuclides 60Co, 59Ni, 90Sr, 135Cs and 129I based on corrosion products from HLW disposal tanks. In this work, the adsorption behavior of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+ and I in α-FeOOH corrosion products of typical metal cans was preliminarily investigated. We achieved this by simulating the groundwater environment, exploring the impact of factors such as pH, temperature, and ionic strength on the adsorption behavior, and discussing the potential adsorption mechanisms. In this paper, we collectively refer to these five ions as nuclide ions.

2. Adsorption Experiment

2.1. Materials Preparation

KOH and Na2CO3 were purchased from Tianjin Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China. NaOH was purchased from Beijing Oriental Shibo Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. HNO3 was purchased from Tianjin Kemi Ou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China. Co(NO3)2·6H2O was purchased from Innochem (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and CsNO3 were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Fe(NO3)3, Sr(NO3)2, KI and NaClO4 were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. All of these chemicals were analytical pure. In addition, 18.2 MΩ deionized ultra-pure water was used for preparing solutions. The calculated dosages of the prepared reserve solution are shown in Table 1. The α-FeOOH sample was prepared using the precipitation-aging method [15]. KOH (5 mg∙L−1, 180 mL) and Fe(NO3)3 (1 mol∙L−1, 100 mL) were mixed in a polypropylene (PP) plastic bottle and diluted with deionized water to a total volume of 2 L. After heating the mixture to 70 °C, the plastic bottle was sealed. After three days of the aging reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and then centrifuged. The solid phase was rinsed with deionized water, dried at 60 °C for 24 h, ground, and passed through a 200-mesh sieve to obtain FeOOH powder.

2.2. Adsorption Experiment for α-FeOOH

In all experimental batches, the pH of α-FeOOH suspension and the reserve solution containing key nuclides were adjusted using appropriate HNO3 and NaOH/Na2CO3 solutions, respectively. The two solutions were then mixed in a centrifuge tube, following a solid–liquid ratio (2 g∙L−1) and oscillated on a constant temperature oscillator. The concentrations of Co2+ and Ni2+ were measured by ICP-OES (Horiba JY2000-2, Kyoto, Japan), and the wavelength of the spectral lines selected for the detection of Co and Ni were 228.62 nm (Co) and 231.60 nm (Ni), respectively. Standard curves, ranging from 0 to 5 mg/L, were established using standard solutions containing specified concentration of(0 mg/L, 1 mg/L, 2 mg/L and 5 mg/L) corresponding element. The samples to be measured were diluted different times so that their concentration fell within the range of standard curve. The concentration of Sr2+, Cs+ and I were measured using internal standard method in ICP-MS (Thermo X7, Waltham, MA, USA), selecting 115In as the internal standard. The isotopes of these elements selected for determination were 88Sr, 133Cs, and 127I. The concentration range of the standard curve is 0–100 ppb (the concentration selection points of the standard curve are 0 μg/L, 0.1 μg/L, 0.5 μg/L, 1 μg/L, 5 μg/L, 10 μg/L, 50 μg/L and 100 μg/L). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were obtained using an ESCALAB 250Xi (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) spectrometer equipped with an Al Kα source (1486.8 eV). XPS spectra were calibrated by setting the major C–C peak of adventitious carbon to 284.8 eV and fitted using the Shirley algorithm background. The crystal structures of α-FeOOH were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Advance, Billerica, MA, USA, Cu Kα X-ray source, λ = 1.5406 Å, step size 0.02°). The scanning rate was 2°/min from 15° to 70° in 2θ. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on a HITACHI Regulus8100 instrument (Tokyo, Japan). The surface area of α-FeOOH measurements were conducted using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method by the instrument ASAP 2020 (Micrometrics, Norcross, GA, USA). The Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, UK) zeta potential analyzer was used to determine the zeta potential of α-FeOOH.
With the variation of concentration before and after adsorption, the adsorption capacity and adsorption distribution coefficient Kd of α-FeOOH for nuclide ions were calculated by the following formula [7]:
q e = ( C 0 C e ) × V m
K d = C 0 C e C e × V m
where C0 (mg∙L−1) and Ce (mg∙L−1) is the initial and after adsorption concentration of key nuclides in sample, respectively, qe (mg∙g−1) is the adsorption capacity of α-FeOOH for key nuclide ions, Kd is the distribution coefficient of nuclide ions in the solid–liquid phase, V (L) is the volume of the suspension and m (g) is the mass of α-FeOOH.

2.3. Preliminary Experiment

The suspension of iron oxide adsorbent and the reserve solution containing nuclide ions are adjusted to the specified pH using an appropriate amount of HNO3 and NaOH/Na2CO3 solution. Two solutions were mixed in a centrifugal tube in accordance with a specified solid–liquid ratio. The mixture was subsequently subjected to oscillation on a constant temperature oscillator to ensure a proper mixing and the homogenization of the solution. Samples were taken at a certain time, and pH of the system was recorded within 10 min after mixing and after the experiment. One group of experiments were conducted for Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+ and I, and each group of experiments contained three parallel samples. The results show that the removal rate of Co2+ and Ni2+ by iron oxide is moderate (35~40%) at the initial concentration of 5 ppm and near neutral pH. The results not only ensure the accuracy of ICP-OES measurement, but also reflect the change of adsorption behavior in a wide range of pH. Under the same conditions, Sr2+, Cs+ and I have relatively poor adsorption performance of the nuclide ion, and the instrument error significantly impacts the accuracy of concentration measurement. Therefore, the initial concentration of these three nuclides is reduced to 1 ppm later in this work, and ICP-MS with higher measurement accuracy was used to determine the concentration of related adsorption samples. In order to better explore the adsorption effect of iron oxides on the five kinds of nuclides under different conditions, the reaction conditions selected after the pre-experiment are shown in Table 2.

2.4. Adsorption Thermodynamics

The calculation of thermodynamic parameters and the analysis of apparent changes in enthalpy (ΔH), entropy (ΔS), and Gibbs free energy (∆G) during the adsorption process are crucial for assessing the feasibility and spontaneity of the process. The thermodynamic properties of the target nuclide ions, namely entropy, enthalpy, and Gibbs free energy (ΔS, ΔH, ∆G), can be determined by calculating the distribution coefficients at various temperatures and substituting them into the relevant equation. This methodology enables the assessment of temperature effect on the adsorption characteristics of crucial nuclide ions by the corrosion products of typical metal tanks. The formula for thermodynamic calculations is presented below [31]:
ln K d = Δ S R Δ H R T
Δ G = Δ H T × Δ S
where Kd is the distribution coefficient (mL∙g−1); T is the absolute temperature (K); R is the ideal gas constant (8.314 J·mol−1·K−1); ∆S is the change in entropy (J·mol−1·K−1); ∆H is the enthalpy change(J·mol−1); ∆G is the Gibbs free energy change (J·mol−1).

2.5. Adsorption Kinetics

In this work, kinetic models were used to further analyze the adsorption of key nuclides on α-FeOOH The equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe) calculated by the experimental model or by the kinetic model were compared to verify the reliability of experimental results. A pseudo-first-order kinetic model and a pseudo-second-order kinetic model were used to fit the adsorption results of five nuclides, respectively. The two kinetic models are described by Equations (5) and (6) [32]:
(1)
pseudo-first-order kinetic model:
log ( q e q t ) = log q e k 1 2.303 × t
(2)
pseudo-second-order kinetic model:
t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + t q e
where qe and qt are adsorption amounts at equilibrium and time t, respectively (mg∙g−1). k1 (min−1) and k2 (g∙mg−1∙min−1) are rate constants of pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, respectively.

3. Results

In this study, α-FeOOH, a typical corrosion product of metal tanks, was selected as the adsorbent to investigate the adsorption behavior of key nuclide ions under various influencing factors. The influences of environmental factors, including contact time, pH, temperature, and ionic strength, on the adsorption efficiency of key nuclides Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+ and I were investigated. Different kinetic models were used to analyze the adsorption process.

3.1. Characterization

The surface chemical composition and bonding information of the adsorbent α-FeOOH obtained by XPS are presented in Figure 1a. The spectrum shows that the adsorbent consists mainly of Fe and O. No N (binding energy of about 400.0 eV) [33] and K (binding energy of about 292.9–295.7 eV) [34] were identified, indicating that nitrate and potassium ions from raw materials were effectively removed by the cleaning process.
Figure 1b shows the XRD pattern of α-FeOOH. It can be seen that the α-FeOOH before adsorption well matches the standard card of goethite (JCPDS:29-0713). The correspondence of the position and intensity of the peaks proves that the synthesized α-FeOOH is well crystallized. The BET specific surface area of α-FeOOH is measured to be 39.4386 m2∙g−1. The SEM image in Figure 1c, further prove that α-FeOOH of goethite has been successfully prepared [35]. Figure 1d presents the measured zeta potential of iron oxide α-FeOOH in function of pH. The point of zero charge (PZC) (pH corresponding to zero zeta potential) of the α-FeOOH particles was determined to be 8.3.
Figure 2a shows the high-resolution Fe 2p spectrum of α-FeOOH before adsorption. The Fe 2p3/2 peak at 710.9 eV and its associated satellite peak at 718.9 eV, as well as the Fe 2p1/2 peak at 724.7 eV and its associated satellite peak at 732.7 eV, can be observed [36]. The results suggest that the valence state of Fe in α-FeOOH is Fe(III) [37]. Figure 2b shows the high-resolution O 1s spectrum of α-FeOOH. The peak at 529.4 eV is assigned to Fe-O, and the peak at 530.6 eV is assigned to Fe-OH [38,39]. The curve fitting result supports the presence of Fe-O and Fe-OH bonds in α-FeOOH, in line with its chemical composition. Figure 2c,d showed the N 1s and K 2p spectra of α-FeOOH, respectively. The absence of N 1s (around 400 eV) [40] and K 2p (292.9~295.7 eV) [41] peaks confirms that the sample does not contain any N and K elements.

3.2. Effect of Adsorption Time

Adsorption equilibrium time is one of the important parameters to evaluate the practicability of adsorbents. The influences of adsorption time on the adsorption of nuclide ions on α-FeOOH was investigated by controlling other conditions obtained in the preliminary experiment (pH 6.5~7.5, temperature 28 °C and NaClO4 0 mmol/L). Figure 3 shows the adsorption kinetics curves of α-FeOOH for Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+ and I. Experimental data show that in the early stage of adsorption, the adsorption rate of Co2+ and Ni2+ nuclides is relatively high, which may be due to the large number of adsorption active sites on α-FeOOH in the early stage. Subsequently, with the reduction in adsorption sites, the adsorption rate gradually flattens and the adsorption reaches equilibrium [42]. As shown in Table 3, the adsorption capacity of Co2+ and Ni2+ is positively correlated with time and is dependent on the number of active sites available on the adsorbent.
In Figure 3a, the initial adsorption capacity of Sr2+ and Cs+ increases during the first 1 h and then decreases, indicating that the adsorption of Sr2+ and Cs+ by α-FeOOH followed a pattern of initial adsorption and desorption resolution. In addition, the adsorption kinetic curve of α-FeOOH adsorption of I shows that the adsorption reaches equilibrium after 12 h.

3.3. Adsorption Kinetics Study

In this work, α-FeOOH adsorption kinetic of nuclide ions was studied under the conditions of adsorption time 72 h, pH 6.5~7.5, temperature 28 °C and NaClO4 0 mmol/L. The interaction force of α-FeOOH adsorption on Sr2+ and Cs+ is weak [30], and the pH of the solution system will be slightly reduced during the adsorption process: Co2+ pH 7.0→pH 6.9; Ni2+ pH 7.2→pH 6.9; Sr2+ pH 7.4→pH 7.0; Cs+ pH 7.5→pH 7.3; I pH 7.6→pH 7.2. Changes in the pH of the solution tend to cause desorption of these weakly adsorbed nuclide ions. Due to the initial adsorption and desorption phenomenon caused by Sr2+ and Cs+, the fitting using the pseudo-first-order kinetic model and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model is not ideal, meaning that the obtained fitting parameters are unreasonable, thus are not listed.
The change of the adsorption capacity of α-FeOOH for Co2+, Ni2+ and I over time is shown in Figure 4. It can also be seen from Figure 4 that both the pseudo-first-order kinetic model and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model fit the primary experimental data well. The equilibrium adsorption capacity (qe) of α-FeOOH for Co2+, Ni2+ and I are 0.674 mg·g−1, 0.743 mg∙g−1 and 0.0295 mg·g−1, respectively, close to the experimental results. Table 4 shows the fitting kinetic parameters of the adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+ and I by α-FeOOH. As can be seen from Table 4, compared with the pseudo-first-order model, the correlation coefficient R2 of the pseudo-second-order kinetic equation is closer to one. This indicated that the adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+ by α-FeOOH is more consistent with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. This indicates that α-FeOOH adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+ may be chemisorption.

3.4. Effect of pH

The influence of pH on the adsorption behavior of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+, and I by α-FeOOH is shown in Figure 5. In this work, the species state distribution of five ions at different pH was calculated by using the species state analysis simulation software Visual MINTEQ 3.1. As can be seen from Figure 5a,b the adsorption capacity of α-FeOOH for Co2+ and Ni2+ increases with the increase in pH in the range of 3~8. In Figure 5e, the adsorption capacity of α-FeOOH for Sr2+ increases with increasing pH. The effect of pH on the adsorption is related to the surface charge properties of iron oxide at different pH conditions and the distribution of the two nuclide ions [43,44,45,46]. Figure 5c,d show that in acidic and near-neutral environments, nuclides exist primarily in the form of Co2+ and Ni2+. Figure 5f shows that Sr2+ exists predominantly as Sr2+ when the solution pH < 10.0. When pH < pHPZC(8.3), the surface of α-FeOOH carries a positive charge, leading to electrostatic repulsion that hinders the adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, and Cs+. However, at pH > pHPZC(8.3), the surface charge of α-FeOOH shifts from positive to negative. Meanwhile, Co2+ and Ni2+ undergo partial hydrolysis to form MOH+, facilitating the formation of strong internal coordination complexes with iron oxide. This results in a rapid increase in adsorption capacity [23]. At higher pH levels, Co(OH)2 and Ni(OH)2 colloids form in the system and easily adhere to the adsorption material’s surface, achieving a nuclide ion removal rate of up to 100%. Outer-sphere surface complexation and/or ion exchange were the main mechanisms of Co2+ adsorption on α-FeOOH at low pH values, whereas innersphere surface complexation was the main adsorption mechanism at high pH values [15]. When the pH > 11.0, Sr2+ gradually hydrolyzes to form SrOH+, enhancing adsorption via electrostatic attraction and further increasing adsorption capacity [1].
Figure 5g illustrates that the adsorption capacity of α-FeOOH for Cs+ initially rises and subsequently decreases with increasing pH. Under acidic conditions, the surface of α-FeOOH becomes positively charged, resulting in a significantly reduced adsorption capacity for Cs+ due to electrostatic repulsion. At pH levels above pHPZC(8.3), the surface of α-FeOOH becomes negatively charged, facilitating a further enhancement of adsorption capacity, with maximum adsorption occurring at pH = 9. With a further increase in pH, the adsorption capacity began to decline, possibly due to the increased introduction of Na+ while adjusting the high pH solution. This decrease resulted from the weak electrostatic interaction between Cs+ and α-FeOOH and the significant reduction in adsorption capacity of Cs+ due to the introduction of other competitive cations with a certain concentration in the system [37]. At low pH, I is unstable and prone to oxidation by HNO3, so pH > 4.0 is selected for research. As illustrated in Figure 5h, the adsorption capacity of I gradually decreases with the increase in pH. In weakly acidic environments, the surface of α-FeOOH becomes positively charged, thereby enhancing the adsorption. As pH increases, the positive surface charge of α-FeOOH decreases, leading to a gradual reduction in the adsorption capacity of I. When the pH exceeds pHPZC, the surface charge of α-FeOOH shifts from positive to negative, leading to a substantial decrease in the adsorption capacity of I.

3.5. Effect of Temperature and Thermodynamic Analysis

The current experimental study aimed to explore the influence of different temperatures (20 °C, 28 °C, 36 °C, 44 °C, and 52 °C) on the adsorption effects. Analysis of Figure 6a–c,e revealed significant effects of temperature elevation on the adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+ and I by α-FeOOH. The experimental results indicate a gradual increase in the adsorption capacity (qe) of α-FeOOH for Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+ and I as the temperature increases from 20 °C to 52 °C. This increase is accompanied by a corresponding rise in Kd values. In addition, it can be seen from Table 5 that ΔS > 0 and ΔH > 0 in the adsorption process of these four nuclide ions indicate that α-FeOOH adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+ and I is a process of entropy increase and heat absorption, and temperature increase is conducive to adsorption. In the study temperature range, ΔG is less than 0, indicating that α-FeOOH adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+ and I is a spontaneous reaction, and ΔG becomes more negative with the increase in temperature, which further indicates that high temperature is conducive to adsorption.
Figure 6d indicates a gradual decrease in the adsorption capacity of α-FeOOH for Cs+ as the temperature increases. The Kd values corresponding to different temperature conditions are consistently low, ranging from 0.023 to 0.010 m3∙kg−1. Additionally, the thermodynamic analysis of Table 5 reveals that the adsorption of Cs+ by α-FeOOH is an exothermic process, accompanied by a reduction in entropy. Furthermore, as the temperature rises, ΔG also increases, further indicating that low temperature is more conducive to the adsorption [47,48].

3.6. Effect of Ionic Strength

This study focuses on investigating the impact of the ClO4 anion present in groundwater on adsorption. Nuclide ion solutions with varying concentrations of NaClO4 were individually mixed with adsorbent suspensions. The pH of both solutions was pre-adjusted to approximately 6.5~7.5. The pH levels were recorded at 10 min and 72 h. As depicted in Figure 7a,b the adsorption capacity qe of Co2+ and Ni2+ remains relatively constant at around 0.60 mg∙g−1 with increasing ion concentration, indicating that the adsorption performance of α-FeOOH for Ni2+ and Co2+ is minimally affected by ion strength. At pH = 7.0, Ni2+ and Co2+ form relatively stable inner coordination complexes on the surface of α-FeOOH. Under these conditions, competitive cations cannot displace the nuclide ions through outer coordination. Consequently, the increase in ionic strength has no significant impact on the adsorption capacity [38]. Figure 7c–e demonstrate a gradual reduction in the adsorption performance of α-FeOOH for Sr2+, Cs+ and I as ionic strength increases. The inclusion of a certain concentration of supporting electrolyte significantly inhibits the adsorption capacity of Sr2+, Cs+ and I. This inhibition can be attributed to the weak force between the nuclide ions and α-FeOOH via outer layer coordination, allowing for the replacement of nuclide ions by competing coordination with negative ions and cations present in the electrolyte solution (Na+ competes with Sr2+, Cs+; ClO4 competes with I) [39]. Consequently, at high concentrations of NaClO4, the adsorption capacity of Sr2+, Cs+ and I approaches zero.

3.7. Adsorption Mechanism

In this study, we analyzed the surface chemical composition and bonding information of iron oxides before and after the adsorption of nuclide ions using a photoelectron spectrometer (XPS). The main objective was to investigate the mechanism of the adsorption effect between α-FeOOH and the nuclide ions. Figure 8 illustrates the XPS full spectrum comparison before and after α-FeOOH adsorption of Co2+ and Ni2+. The two full spectrums of α-FeOOH showed no remarkable difference. Subsequently, Figure 9a presents the high-resolution spectrum of Co 2p after α-FeOOH adsorption of Co2+. Generally, the binding energy of Co2+ is 781 eV [49,50]. However, in this spectrum, the peak is located at 784 eV, in good agreement with the Auger electron spectral line peak of Fe, indicating that the presence of a large amount of Fe in the adsorbent material determines the characteristic peak rather than the adsorbed Co. Therefore, the characteristic peak of Co cannot be definitively determined at this stage. Furthermore, Figure 9b demonstrates the high-resolution spectrum of Ni 2p after α-FeOOH adsorption of Ni2+; the peak at 847 eV is the Fe 2s characteristic peak of iron oxides [51]. In Figure 9b, the 854.4 eV peak corresponds to the Ni2+-O peak of nickel oxide (NiO), consistent with the binding energy of Ni-O bond reported in the literature [52,53]. This observation indicates that Ni2+ interacts strongly with oxygen on the surface of α-FeOOH. These findings suggest that α-FeOOH may bind to Ni2+ through internal coordination and that the chemical valence state of Ni remains unchanged during the adsorption process.
Figure 10a depicts the full XPS spectrum before and after the adsorption of Sr2+, Cs+, and I on α-FeOOH. No evident difference is observed between the full spectra of α-FeOOH before and after adsorption. Figure 10b displays the Cs 3d spectrum after the adsorption of Cs+ on α-FeOOH. The characteristic peak of Cs 3d5/2 is at 724.8 eV, while the satellite peak of Fe (Fe 2p1/2) is located at 724 eV [20]. The presence of a substantial amount of Fe3+ in the sample interferes with the identification of Cs 3d characteristic peaks. Therefore, the binding energy peak near 725 eV in Figure 10b belongs to the characteristic peak of Fe 2p1/2 rather than Cs 3d. Due to the insufficient adsorption capacity of α-FeOOH for Cs+, the characteristic peak of Cs 3d cannot be observed. Generally, XPS test results are more accurate when the mass content of elements in the sample exceeds 5%. In this case, the low adsorption capacity of α-FeOOH for Sr2+, Cs+ and I leads to the absence of characteristic peaks.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the typical metal tank corrosion product α-FeOOH was proposed as an adsorbent for the absorption of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+ and I. The influences of external conditions on the properties of adsorbent was systematically studied, and the adsorption mechanism was elucidated. The adsorption equilibrium for Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+ and I occurred at 72 h, 48 h, 24 h, 24 h, and 12 h, respectively. The adsorption kinetic of Co2+, Ni2+ and I is more consistent with that of chemisorption. The morphology of nuclides and the positive and negative charges on α-FeOOH change with the increasing pH values in the system. The adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+ and Sr2+ showed the best efficiency under alkaline conditions. With increasing pH, the adsorption capacity of Cs+ initially increases and then decreases, while the adsorption capacity of I gradually decreases. The adsorption capacity of α-FeOOH for Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+ and I increases with increasing temperature. The calculation of thermodynamic parameters reveals that the adsorption behavior of the aforementioned four nuclides involves entropy increase and heat absorption. In contrast, Cs+ exhibits entropy decrease and heat release, which corresponds to the experimental observation of decreased adsorption capacity with increasing temperature. The calculation of thermodynamic parameters reveals that the adsorption behavior of the aforementioned four nuclides involves entropy increase and heat absorption. In contrast, Cs+ exhibits entropy decrease and heat release, which corresponds to the experimental observation of decreased adsorption capacity with increasing temperature. Due to the competitive coordination between negative ions, cation ions in the electrolyte, and nuclide ions, the adsorption capacity of Sr2+, Cs+ and I decreases with increasing ionic strength of the system. XPS patterns were used to analyze the main characteristic peaks before and after α-FeOOH adsorption, the peak of 854.4 eV was consistent with the binding energy of Ni-O bond, indicating that Ni2+ interacts strongly with oxygen on the surface of α-FeOOH.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Y. (Yukun Yuan); methodology, Y.D. and L.L.; software, L.L. and Y.D.; validation, Y.Y. (Yufaning Yin) and G.D.; investigation Y.R. and S.L.; data curation, Y.D. and L.L.; writing—original draft, Y.D. and G.D.; Writing—review and editing, Y.D. and P.L.; project administration, P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Yingzhe Du, Lili Li, Yukun Yuan, Yufaning Yin, Genggeng Dai, Yaqing Ren, Shiying Li and Peng Lin were employed by the company China Nuclear Power Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nie, Z.; Finck, N.; Heberling, F.; Pruessmann, T.; Liu, C.; Lützenkirchen, J. Adsorption of Selenium and Strontium on Goethite: EXAFS Study and Surface Complexation Modeling of the Ternary Systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 3751–3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bracke, G.; Kudla, W.; Rosenzweig, T. Status of Deep Borehole Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in Germany. Energies 2019, 12, 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Carter, A.; Kelly, M.; Bailey, L. Radioactive high level waste insight modelling for geological disposal facilities. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2013, 64, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gibb, F.G.F.; Beswick, A.J. A deep borehole disposal solution for the UK’s high-level radioactive waste. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Energy 2022, 175, 11–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jeong, J.; Lee, Y.-M.; Kim, J.-W.; Cho, D.-K.; Ko, N.Y.; Baik, M.H. Progress of the long-term safety assessment of a reference disposal system for high level wastes in Korea. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2016, 90, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. King, F.; Padovani, C. Review of the corrosion performance of selected canister materials for disposal of UK HLW and/or spent fuel. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bennett, D.G.; Gens, R. Overview of European concepts for high-level waste and spent fuel disposal with special reference waste container corrosion. J. Nucl. Mater. 2008, 379, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ewing, R.C. Long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rigonat, N.; Isnard, O.; Harley, S.L.; Butler, I.B. Monitoring long-term evolution of engineered barrier systems using magnets: Magnetic response. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 341, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, X.; Liu, Y.; Dong, J.; Cao, S.; Xie, J.; Chen, N.; Xue, F.; Wang, C.; Ke, W. Study on corrosion behavior of low carbon steel under different water conditions in bentonite of China-Mock-Up. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 167, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grambow, B.; Smailos, E.; Geckeis, H.; Muller, R.; Hentschel, H. Sorption and reduction of uranium(VI) on iron corrosion products under reducing saline conditions. Radiochim. Acta 1996, 74, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, B.; Fernandez-Martinez, A.; Madé, B.; Findling, N.; Markelova, E.; Salas-Colera, E.; Maffeis, T.G.G.; Lewis, A.R.; Tisserand, D.; Bureau, S.; et al. XANES-Based Determination of Redox Potentials Imposed by Steel Corrosion Products in Cement-Based Media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 11931–11940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, J.; Zhu, R.; Ma, L.; Fu, H.; Lin, X.; Parker, S.C.; Molinari, M. Adsorption of phosphate and cadmium on iron (oxyhydr)oxides: A comparative study on ferrihydrite, goethite, and hematite. Geoderma 2021, 383, 114799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shi, M.; Min, X.; Ke, Y.; Lin, Z.; Yang, Z.; Wang, S.; Peng, N.; Yan, X.; Luo, S.; Wu, J.; et al. Recent progress in understanding the mechanism of heavy metals retention by iron (oxyhydr)oxides. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 752, 141930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, Z.; Xu, D.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, S.; Xu, J. Influence of pH, ionic strength, foreign ions and FA on adsorption of radiocobalt on goethite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2011, 287, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, C.; Yao, J.; Knudsen, T.Š.; Liu, J.; Zhu, X.; Ma, B.; Li, H.; Cao, Y.; Liu, B. Performance and mechanisms for Cd(II) and As(III) simultaneous adsorption by goethite-loaded montmorillonite in aqueous solution and soil. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 330, 117163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goldberg, S. Chemical Modeling of Anion Competition on Goethite Using the Constant Capacitance Model. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1985, 49, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, G.; Qafoku, N.P.; Szecsody, J.E.; Strickland, C.E.; Brown, C.F.; Freedman, V.L. Time-Dependent Iodate and Iodide Adsorption to Fe Oxides. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019, 3, 2415–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, P.; Binter, E.A.; Vo, T.; Benjamin, I.; Bera, M.K.; Lin, B.; Bu, W.; Schlossman, M.L. Relevance of Surface Adsorption and Aqueous Complexation for the Separation of Co(II), Ni(II), and Fe(III). J. Phys. Chem. B 2023, 127, 3505–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ugwu, I.M.; Sherman, D.M. The solubility of goethite with structurally incorporated nickel and cobalt: Implication for laterites. Chem. Geol. 2019, 518, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Johansen, M.P.; Ruedig, E.; Tagami, K.; Uchida, S.; Higley, K.; Beresford, N.A. Radiological Dose Rates to Marine Fish from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident: The First Three Years Across the North Pacific. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 1277–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, W.; Yu, K.; Du, J.; Lin, H.; Yu, W.; Mo, M. Marine ecological environment impact and countermeasures under the scenario of Fukushima nuclear wastewater discharge in Japan. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 4500–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Achour, S.; Amokrane, S.; Chegrouche, S.; Guedioura, B.; Nibou, D. Adsorption Mechanism Study of Radionuclide 60Co by Purified and α-Fe2O3-Supported Bentonite from Radioactive Solution. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 47, 5629–5645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, H.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Yu, X. Impact of environmental conditions on the adsorption behavior of radionuclide Ni(II) onto hematite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2010, 287, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Casacuberta, N.; Masqué, P.; Garcia-Orellana, J.; Garcia-Tenorio, R.; Buesseler, K.O. 90Sr and 89Sr in seawater off Japan as a consequence of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident. Biogeosciences 2013, 10, 3649–3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lin, W.; Zhang, F.; Yu, K.; Ma, H.; Du, J.; Mo, Z.; Li, Y.; He, X.; Mo, M. Assessment and enrichment of artificial radionuclides in coral reef ecosystems. Adv. Earth Sci. 2023, 38, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dash, B.; Dash, B.; Rath, S.S. A thorough understanding of the adsorption of Ni (II), Cd (II) and Zn (II) on goethite using experiments and molecular dynamics simulation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 240, 116649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Collins, C.R.; Sherman, D.M.; Ragnarsdottir, K.V. The adsorption mechanism of Sr2+ on the surface of goethite. Radiochim. Acta 1998, 81, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fuller, A.J.; Shaw, S.; Peacock, C.L.; Trivedi, D.; Burke, I.T. EXAFS Study of Sr sorption to Illite, Goethite, Chlorite, and Mixed Sediment under Hyperalkaline Conditions. Langmuir 2016, 32, 2937–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Efimova, N.V.; Krasnopyorova, A.P.; Yuhno, G.D.; Sofronov, D.S.; Rucki, M. Uptake of Radionuclides (60)Co, (137)Cs, and (90)Sr with alpha-Fe2O3 and Fe2O3 Particles from Aqueous Environment. Materials 2021, 14, 2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Wang, C.; Zhu, Q.; Luo, J.; Chen, F.; Xiao, F.; Peng, G. Fabrication of magnetic functionalized m-carboxyphenyl azo calix[4]arene amine oxime derivatives for highly efficient and selective adsorption of uranium (VI). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2020, 323, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, G.; Liu, S.; Dong, L.; Gu, P.; Hou, L.a. Rapid and effective removal of strontium ions from aqueous solutions by a novel layered metal sulfide NaTS-2. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2023, 332, 2367–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Datta, M.; Mathieu, H.J.; Landolt, D. AES/XPS Study of Transpassive Films on Iron in Nitrate Solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 131, 2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. He, X.; Li, J.; Chen, M.; Jin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. Resistance of deliquescence and caking to enhance the effective utilization of potassium nitrate: A novel surface modification method by SDS. Powder Technol. 2019, 356, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hou, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Tang, S.; Zhang, J.; Pan, Q.; Hu, T. Goethite Enhances Cr(VI) Reduction by S. oneidensis MR-1 under Different Conditions: Mechanistic Insights. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, Y.; Ding, J.; Zhang, A. Experimental and theoretical studies of cadmium adsorption over Fe2O3 sorbent in incineration flue gas. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 425, 131647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, H.; Wei, G.; Xu, Z.; Liu, P.; Li, Y. Quantitative analysis of Fe and Co in Co-substituted magnetite using XPS: The application of non-linear least squares fitting (NLLSF). Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 389, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, L.-K.; Wu, H.; Zhang, H.-B.; Cao, H.-Z.; Hou, G.-Y.; Tang, Y.-P.; Zheng, G.-Q. Graphene oxide/CuFe2O4 foam as an efficient absorbent for arsenic removal from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 1808–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, D.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, S. Enhanced PEC performance of hematite photoanode coupled with bimetallic oxyhydroxide NiFeOOH through a simple electroless method. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 265, 118580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Muthu, M.; Ramachandran, D.; Hasan, N.; Jeevanandam, M.; Gopal, J.; Chun, S. Unprecedented nitrate adsorption efficiency of carbon-silicon nano composites prepared from bamboo leaves. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 189, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, Y.; Deng, Z.; Li, Z.; Lin, Q.; Wu, Y.; Dou, W. Adsorption characteristics and mechanism for K2Ti4O9 whiskers removal of Pb(II), Cd(II), and Cu(II) cations in wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hamed, M.M.; Ahmed, I.M.; Holiel, M. Retention behavior of anionic radionuclides using metal hydroxide sludge. Radiochim. Acta 2019, 107, 1161–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hamed, M.M.; Holiel, M.; El-Aryan, Y.F. Removal of selenium and iodine radionuclides from waste solutions using synthetic inorganic ion exchanger. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 242, 722–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jordan, N.; Foerstendorf, H.; Weiß, S.; Heim, K.; Schild, D.; Brendler, V. Sorption of selenium(VI) onto anatase: Macroscopic and microscopic characterization. Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta 2011, 75, 1519–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, X.; Ma, J.; Lu, X.; Huangfu, X.; Zou, J. High efficient removal of molybdenum from water by Fe2(SO4)3: Effects of pH and affecting factors in the presence of co-existing background constituents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 300, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Netpradit, S.; Thiravetyan, P.; Towprayoon, S. Application of ‘waste’ metal hydroxide sludge for adsorption of azo reactive dyes. Water Res. 2003, 37, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dai, Y.; Lv, R.; Fan, J.; Zhang, X.; Tao, Q. Adsorption of cesium using supermolecular impregnated XAD-7 composite: Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2019, 321, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hu, Y.-Y.; Pan, C.; Zheng, X.; Hu, F.; Xu, L.; Xu, G.; Jian, Y.; Peng, X. Prediction and optimization of adsorption properties for Cs+ on NiSiO@NiAlFe LDHs hollow spheres from aqueous solution: Kinetics, isotherms, and BBD model. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chen, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, D.; Feng, Z.; Li, X.; Huang, J.; Shen, X. Construction of hierarchical Mn-CoO@Fe(OH)3 nanofiber array for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 847, 155560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yu, J.; Zhong, Y.; Wu, X.; Sunarso, J.; Ni, M.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Bifunctionality from Synergy: CoP Nanoparticles Embedded in Amorphous CoOx Nanoplates with Heterostructures for Highly Efficient Water Electrolysis. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Santaya, M.; Jimenez, C.E.; Esteban Troiani, H.; Carbonio, E.A.; Damian Arce, M.; Maria Toscani, L.; Garcia-Diez, R.; Wilks, R.G.; Knop-Gericke, A.; Baer, M.; et al. Tracking the nanoparticle exsolution/reoxidation processes of Ni-doped SrTi0.3Fe0.7O3−δ electrodes for intermediate temperature symmetric solid oxide fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 15554–15568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Carley, A.F.; Jackson, S.D.; O’Shea, J.N.; Roberts, M.W. The formation and characterisation of Ni3+: An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic investigation of potassium-doped Ni(110)-O. Surf. Sci. 1999, 440, L868–L874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, Y.S.; Kang, J.F.; Chen, B.; Gao, B.; Liu, L.F.; Liu, X.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wu, L.; Yu, H.Y.; Wang, J.Y.; et al. Microscopic mechanism for unipolar resistive switching behaviour of nickel oxides. J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 2012, 45, 065303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Characterization diagrams of α-FeOOH. (a) XPS survey spectrum of α-FeOOH; (b) XRD patterns of α-FeOOH; (c) SEM image; (d) zeta potential in function of pH.
Figure 1. Characterization diagrams of α-FeOOH. (a) XPS survey spectrum of α-FeOOH; (b) XRD patterns of α-FeOOH; (c) SEM image; (d) zeta potential in function of pH.
Materials 17 02706 g001
Figure 2. High-resolution spectrum of α-FeOOH. (a) Fe 2p; (b) O 1s; (c) N 1s; (d) K 2p.
Figure 2. High-resolution spectrum of α-FeOOH. (a) Fe 2p; (b) O 1s; (c) N 1s; (d) K 2p.
Materials 17 02706 g002aMaterials 17 02706 g002b
Figure 3. At pH 6.5~7.5, temperature 28 °C and NaClO4 0 mmol/L, influence of contact time on adsorption effect. (a) qe; (b) Kd.
Figure 3. At pH 6.5~7.5, temperature 28 °C and NaClO4 0 mmol/L, influence of contact time on adsorption effect. (a) qe; (b) Kd.
Materials 17 02706 g003
Figure 4. Kinetic fitting curves of α-FeOOH adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+ and I. (a) Co2+; (b) Ni2+; (c) I.
Figure 4. Kinetic fitting curves of α-FeOOH adsorption of Co2+, Ni2+ and I. (a) Co2+; (b) Ni2+; (c) I.
Materials 17 02706 g004
Figure 5. Effect of pH on the adsorption of (a) Co2+, (b) Ni2+, (e) Sr2+, (g) Cs+, and (h) I by α-FeOOH and probability distribution graph of (c) Co2+, (d) Ni2+, and (f) Sr2+.
Figure 5. Effect of pH on the adsorption of (a) Co2+, (b) Ni2+, (e) Sr2+, (g) Cs+, and (h) I by α-FeOOH and probability distribution graph of (c) Co2+, (d) Ni2+, and (f) Sr2+.
Materials 17 02706 g005aMaterials 17 02706 g005b
Figure 6. Effect of temperature on the adsorption of (a) Co2+, (b) Ni2+, (c) Sr2+, (d) Cs+ and (e) I by α-FeOOH. (f) Effect of temperature on Kd.
Figure 6. Effect of temperature on the adsorption of (a) Co2+, (b) Ni2+, (c) Sr2+, (d) Cs+ and (e) I by α-FeOOH. (f) Effect of temperature on Kd.
Materials 17 02706 g006aMaterials 17 02706 g006b
Figure 7. Effect of ion strength on the adsorption of (a) Co2+, (b) Ni2+, (c) Sr2+, (d) Cs+ and (e) I by α-FeOOH.
Figure 7. Effect of ion strength on the adsorption of (a) Co2+, (b) Ni2+, (c) Sr2+, (d) Cs+ and (e) I by α-FeOOH.
Materials 17 02706 g007
Figure 8. XPS full spectrum comparison of α-FeOOH before and after adsorption of Co2+ and Ni2+.
Figure 8. XPS full spectrum comparison of α-FeOOH before and after adsorption of Co2+ and Ni2+.
Materials 17 02706 g008
Figure 9. High-resolution spectrum of α-FeOOH after adsorption. (a) Co 2p; (b) Ni 2p.
Figure 9. High-resolution spectrum of α-FeOOH after adsorption. (a) Co 2p; (b) Ni 2p.
Materials 17 02706 g009
Figure 10. XPS full spectrum of α-FeOOH before and after adsorption of Sr2+, Cs+ and I. (a) XPS images before and after adsorption; (b) Cs 3d.
Figure 10. XPS full spectrum of α-FeOOH before and after adsorption of Sr2+, Cs+ and I. (a) XPS images before and after adsorption; (b) Cs 3d.
Materials 17 02706 g010
Table 1. Calculation of isotope ion reserve solution amount for preparation.
Table 1. Calculation of isotope ion reserve solution amount for preparation.
Nuclide IonsInorganic SaltsMion
(g∙mol−1)
Minorganic salts
(g∙mol−1)
Calculated Dosage (mg)
Co2+Co(NO3)2·6H2O58.9291.03370.5815
Ni2+Ni(NO3)2·6H2O58.69290.79371.6008
Sr2+Sr(NO3)287.63211.63181.1280
Cs+CsNO3132.9194.91109.9944
IKI126.9166.098.2636
Note: Mion—Molecular weight of ion; Minorganic salts—Molecular weight of inorganic salts.
Table 2. Adsorption experimental conditions.
Table 2. Adsorption experimental conditions.
Research ObjectExperimental ConditionsMain Selection Condition
Adsorption time1 min, 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h,
18 h, 24 h, 36 h, 48 h, 72 h
72 h
pH2.0~12.06.5~7.5
Temperature20 °C, 28 °C, 36 °C, 44 °C, 52 °C28 °C
Ionic strength (NaClO4)0 mmol/L, 0.5 mmol/L, 1 mmol/L, 5 mmol/L, 10 mmol/L, 50 mmol/L, 100 mmol/L0 mmol/L
Table 3. At pH 6.5~7.5, temperature 28 °C and NaClO4 0 mmol/L, the α-FeOOH of nuclide ions adsorption equilibrium data.
Table 3. At pH 6.5~7.5, temperature 28 °C and NaClO4 0 mmol/L, the α-FeOOH of nuclide ions adsorption equilibrium data.
Nuclide IonsAdsorption Equilibrium Time
(h)
qe 
(mg∙g−1)
Kd
(m3∙kg−1)
Co2+480.690.196
Ni2+720.780.247
Sr2+240.20.044
Cs+240.340.039
I120.0290.031
Note: qe—Equilibrium adsorption capacity; Kd—Distribution coefficient.
Table 4. The calculated parameters of the pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order kinetic models for sorption of Co2+, Ni2+ and I.
Table 4. The calculated parameters of the pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order kinetic models for sorption of Co2+, Ni2+ and I.
Nuclide
Ions
Pseudo-First-Order Kinetic ModelPseudo-Second-Order Kinetic Model
k1 (min−1)qe/(mg·g−1)R2k2/(g·mg−1·min−1)qe/(mg·g−1)R2
Co2+0.06160.6600.9600.21350.6740.978
Ni2+0.05960.7260.9510.18310.7430.971
I0.01450.02690.9400.66050.02950.982
Table 5. α-FeOOH adsorption of Co2+ (R2 = 0.8044), Ni2+ (R2 = 0.8429), Sr2+ (R2 = 0.9282), Cs+ (R2 = 0.9544), I (R2 = 0.6276), the thermodynamic parameters.
Table 5. α-FeOOH adsorption of Co2+ (R2 = 0.8044), Ni2+ (R2 = 0.8429), Sr2+ (R2 = 0.9282), Cs+ (R2 = 0.9544), I (R2 = 0.6276), the thermodynamic parameters.
Nuclide
Ions
ΔS
(J·mol−1·K−1)
ΔH
(kJ·mol−1)
G (kJ·mol−1)
293.15 K301.15 K309.15 K317.15 K325.15 K
Co2+133.44225.966−13.153−14.220−15.288−16.356−17.423
Ni2+112.29719.500−13.420−14.319−15.217−16.115−17.014
Sr2+151.09131.683−12.609−13.818−15.027−16.236−17.444
Cs+−40.348−19.432−7.604−7.281−6.959−6.636−6.313
I95.83921.411−6.684−7.451−8.218−8.984−9.751
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, Y.; Li, L.; Yuan, Y.; Yin, Y.; Dai, G.; Ren, Y.; Li, S.; Lin, P. Adsorption Behavior of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+, and I by Corrosion Products α-FeOOH from Typical Metal Tanks. Materials 2024, 17, 2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112706

AMA Style

Du Y, Li L, Yuan Y, Yin Y, Dai G, Ren Y, Li S, Lin P. Adsorption Behavior of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+, and I by Corrosion Products α-FeOOH from Typical Metal Tanks. Materials. 2024; 17(11):2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112706

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Yingzhe, Lili Li, Yukun Yuan, Yufaning Yin, Genggeng Dai, Yaqing Ren, Shiying Li, and Peng Lin. 2024. "Adsorption Behavior of Co2+, Ni2+, Sr2+, Cs+, and I by Corrosion Products α-FeOOH from Typical Metal Tanks" Materials 17, no. 11: 2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112706

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop