1. Introduction
The European market offers a wide range of truck scales, usually with a nominal load capacity of 6 to 90 tons [
1,
2]. The basic requirements for truck scale platforms include high durability, stiffness, and light weight. Scales with a working range up to 20 tons are used most frequently as portable steel platforms. Scales with larger nominal capacities are produced as recessed or overground structures, usually made from steel, reinforced and prestressed concrete, or steel–concrete (steel bearing beams with a filling RC panel). Unfortunately, these three requirements are mutually exclusive in any constructional solution. Truck scales with steel platforms are lighter but remain prone to corrosion and require additional resources to maintain their condition during their lifetime. Reinforced concrete and steel–concrete slabs are cheaper to maintain and have higher durability than steel platforms. The main disadvantage of RC slabs is their high weight, which increases the costs for transporting such slabs. For example, the weight of a single module of a reinforced concrete platform with a capacity of 60 tons and a length of 6.0 m can be over 10 tons, while the weight of a whole platform with a length of 18.0 m can be 32 tons. The solution that best fulfills all requirements is post-tensioned concrete. This technology allows the construction of slender panels (light in weight) with high stiffness and good durability.
At Cracow University of Technology, we attempted to design lightweight platforms made from prestressed concrete for vehicle scales with a working range of up to 60 tons. The slabs were designed to be partially prestressed (operating as cracked) using unbonded tendons (monostrands) due to the low weight of the structures relative to the service load and established prestressing limits.
The problems in designing partially prestressed elements have been a subject of interest among many researchers. Since the 1960s, numerous studies and research reports, conducted primarily in the US and, to a lesser extent, in Europe, have been published in this area (Albelsey [
3], Lin [
4], Moustafa [
5], and Naaman et al. [
6,
7,
8]). The reactions of partially prestressed elements subjected to cyclic loading have also been studied, albeit to a much lesser extent [
9,
10]. Undoubtedly, the least explored issue is the behavior of elements prestressed by unbonded tendons under cyclic loads. Post-tensioned columns with unbonded tendons have been subjected to many tests under cyclic loading [
11,
12], as have post-tensioned walls with unbonded tendons [
13]. However, a study on partially prestressed slender slabs with unbonded tendons under cyclic loads has not yet been published. The present study seeks to fill this research gap.
Given the calculation difficulties in assessing the behavior of slabs during the expected period of use at the Research Laboratory of Cracow University of Technology, we constructed the two slabs with the design and technology typically used for platforms. The slabs were tested under cyclic loads. The number of cycles was matched with the lifetime of a platform and the intensity of its use, and the value of the load was matched with the characteristics of weighed vehicles. The paper presents the basic assumptions, design problems, applied design solutions, and results of the conducted tests, along with comments and conclusions.
3. Test Results
Figure 11 illustrates the deflection and crack width development at the beginning (after 1000 cycles) and end (after a million cycles for slab No. 1 and 888,000 cycles for slab No. 2) of the repetitive load test. For slab No. 1, when the load changed from 20 to 150 kN, deflection initially changed from 4.4 to 20.4 mm (continuous dark blue line) and from 5.7 to 22.9 mm at the end (dotted dark blue line). The crack width changed from 0.01 to 0.11 mm at the start and from 0.01 to 0.12 mm at the end. For slab No. 2, when subjected to a load change within the limits of 40 and 180 kN, deflection oscillated between 5.3 and 26.2 mm at the start (continuous red line) and between 8.4 and 31.2 mm at the end (dotted red line). The crack width changed from 0.025 to 0.18 mm at the start and from 0.03 to 0.21 mm at the end. The results indicate that the deflection and crack width grew alongside an increase in the load cycles, especially for slab No. 2.
The first slab tested under a cyclically variable load of 150 kN successfully handled 1,000,000 load cycles. The changes in the behavior of this slab after increasing the number of cycles is discussed later in this section considering changes in the measured values, together with the results for slab No. 2. After completion, the program was loaded again—this time, until the slab was destroyed. The course of selected parameters up to the destruction test is shown in
Figure 12. The extension value of the press piston was used as a measure of deformation.
Figure 12a shows the dependence of the force generated by the press and piston displacement. The greatest load capacity was reached by the slab when the piston extended by 110 mm, with a value of 364 kN. In that position, the load capacity had already begun to fall dramatically. The rapid collapse of the load–displacement dependence occurred under a displacement area of 60 mm. The sudden loss of rigidity at that point was also confirmed by a sudden increase in crack width (
Figure 12c).
Figure 12b shows the increased average force in prestressing strands, which rose from 176.7 to 219.5 kN.
Figure 12d illustrates the increased stress values in the reinforcement bars, calculated based on the average strain of strain gauges on the bars. These stresses were determined based on an elasticity modulus value equal to 202.3 GPa using a bar tensile test. In the displacement area of 60 mm, the strain gauges were damaged due to a sudden loss of stiffness. The largest registered stress was 336 MPa, and the average width of the crack was 0.40 mm.
The attempted destruction of the slab showed that the programmed upper value for a cyclically variable load of 150 kN is 41%, while the load amplitude alone is 36% of the breaking load. We generally assumed that a variable cyclic load less than 0.4 times that of the breaking load would not lead to RC element failure due to fatigue. Considering the positive test results for the first slab (small permanent changes in monitored values—see the following figures), we decided to increase the upper limit and amplitude of cyclic loading when loading slab No. 2. The upper value of the force amounted to 180 kN, while the bottom value was increased to 40 kN. The upper load value was then 49%, and the amplitude alone was 38% of the breaking load. This slab unexpectedly failed after approximately 980,000 cycles, a few hours before the scheduled completion of the loading process. The damage was caused by fatigue and a sudden increase in deflection, breaking 9 out of 12 reinforced bars (
Figure 13). The two external bars at the first edge and the corner bar at the second edge remained undamaged. Excessive deflection resulted in immediate arrest of the hydraulic cylinder, causing a cyclic load.
Figure 14 shows an arrangement of registered cracks on one of the side surfaces of slab No. 2. Here, the cracks formed immediately upon loading the slab with a force of 180 kN are marked in red. Blue indicates the propagation of cracks after 137,000 load cycles. Further cyclic loading revealed no coverage growth or new cracks. The average spacing of cracks in the cross-section between concentrated forces amounted to 130 mm, with widths ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 mm.
The wait time was approximately 30 min after the cyclic loadings were stopped, after which the residual deflection of the slab was registered, as shown in
Figure 15a. Due to prestressing, the 2 mm camber of slab No. 1 and 1.8 mm camber of slab No. 2 were permanently eliminated during the initial loading of the slabs. Residual deflections increased with the number of load cycles. For slab No. 1 (under a cyclic load of 150 kN) and slab No. 2 (under a cyclic load of 180 kN), the residual deflection was 1.1 mm after 1 million cycles and 1.9 mm after 888 thousand cycles.
Figure 15b shows the results of increasing deflections when a control load of 180 kN was applied. The results show an increase in value accompanied by an increase in the number of cycles, especially for slab No. 2. Here, the deflection under a control load was much higher shortly after post-tensioning because post-tensioning reduced the effect of the camber.
The significant increase observed in the deflection of slab No. 2, between 763 and 888 thousand cycles, was produced by a significant decrease in the force of one of the strands (
Figure 16), which is discussed in the analysis of prestressing forces. Excluding this case from further analysis, the increase in deflections was 21.3 mm for slab No. 1 and 23.9 mm for slab No. 2, constituting 1/278 and 1/248 of the span, respectively. Thus, we can conclude that the limit value was almost achieved for the two slabs based on a limit value of L/250.
Figure 16 shows the course of prestressing force depending on the load applied at different stages of the cyclic load for slab No. 2. For both slabs, a decrease in the initial and final prestressing force with the number of load cycles was observed in the process of loading. This observation highlights the declining role of prestressing and the increasing role of ordinary reinforcement as the number of cycles increases. Indeed, this result was confirmed by the stress increases in ordinary steel (
Figure 17b). The drastic decrease in prestressing force after 888 thousand cycles was caused by a decrease in the force of one strand. The initial value of the force in the cable decreased from 182 kN to 152 kN, i.e., 16%. This decrease was likely caused by a fatigue interruption in one of the seven wires in the strand (a 14% loss in the strand cross-sectional area).
Figure 17 shows the changes in the width of cracks and stresses in reinforcing steel with an increase in the number of cycles. In both cases, an upward trend can be observed. The width of the crack remained at a safe level throughout the entire range of loading. In slab No. 1, the width fluctuated between 0.14 and 0.15 mm, while in slab No. 2, the width fluctuated between 0.18 and 0.19 mm. Notably, the width of the crack was smaller than the calculated value of 0.21 mm. The average spacing of cracks was 130 mm—more than two-times lower than the theoretical value of 310 mm. The stresses in ordinary steel oscillated around a calculated value of 245.9 MPa for slab No 1 and clearly increased with the number of cycles for slab No. 2.
4. Conclusions
The results of the conducted tests indicated the following:
At a nominal load of 150 kN, the slab resisted 1,000,000 load cycles without any significant increase in the values indicating worsening serviceability conditions or durability (crack width, residual deflection, and deflection increase under service load).
At a cyclic load of 180 kN, the slab failed at the end of the programmed load (after 980,000 cycles). However, this result considers a 20% overload of the vehicle, and the probability of such a load occurring in nature is equal to zero based on the number of cycles established in the tests.
For the more strongly loaded slab No. 2, we observed a decrease in the role of prestressing as the number of cycles increased (
Figure 16). Cross-sectional tensile forces were taken up by the ordinary reinforcement (
Figure 17b).
The obtained results were not compared with those from other tests, as similar studies have not yet been published. There is also a lack of calculation procedures for analytically determining the studied parameters.
Further optimization to decrease the thickness of the slabs or the amount of reinforcement and prestressing may be unachievable as the slab already reached its deflection limits, and stresses in ordinary reinforcements achieved a high level of almost 290 MPa. Further savings could be achieved in the weights of slabs and the amount of concrete by increasing the number of channels.
This paper presents the development results for the first Polish slabs for truck scales made from prestressed concrete with unbonded tendons, as well as the results of laboratory tests under repetitive loads. These slabs were invented, tested, and implemented for mass production by the authors of this paper. The process of shaping these slabs into their final form required approximately two years of work. At that time, three versions of the slabs were created. Notably, there is another European patent on a slab featuring a similar load capacity and thickness of 350 mm. However, the present slab is 280 mm thick and was made with a core version, which significantly reduced its weight.
Our results show that these slabs were properly designed and should work successfully for many years with proper maintenance and the avoidance of unforeseen factors. The period of use, however, will depend on the aggressiveness of the environment causing corrosion of steel and concrete.
Notably, although the present results are unique, they cannot be generalized in any way due to the unexplored nature of the observed phenomena. Plates with similar parameters to those used in this study may behave similarly. However, with changes in any parameter (crack width, load, or stress level in the reinforcement), their behavior will be completely different (as observed in the differences between slabs No. 1 and 2).
Ultimately, our positive experience with the analysis and maintenance of slabs under the studied conditions of use contributed to the development of a novel truck scale with a capacity of 30 tons. This scale features a single-span concrete platform 3.00 × 8.00 m in size and 240 mm thick, prestressed with 10 unbonded tendons.