Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Fire Resistance of Geopolymers Modified with Thermal Insulation Additives
Previous Article in Journal
Eco-Design of Thermopressing through Induction of 100% Coriander-Based Fiberboards: Optimization of Molding Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(19), 4853; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194853
Submission received: 7 August 2024 / Revised: 27 September 2024 / Accepted: 28 September 2024 / Published: 1 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Biomaterials)

Abstract

This article comprehensively reviews the performance of simplified direct restorative materials that have the potential to be an alternative to amalgam. Following an understanding of the material structures and clinical performances, this review provides an analysis of the bonding mechanisms and influential factors on the bond strength. These factors include substrate-related variations, involving primary vs. permanent dentin, sound- vs. caries-affected/demineralized dentin comparisons and surface-related factors and pretreatments. Special attention is given to the factors changing the substrate surface, such as different contaminants, remedy methods after contamination and different conditioning methods related to the materials. Variations in sample preparation and bond strength test parameters are also evaluated for the analysis of the outcomes. This review aims to provide an overview of the factors involved in the application procedure of direct restorations together with in vitro testing variations to guide the selection of suitable materials by understanding strengths and shortcomings.
Keywords: bond strength; glass ionomer cement; resin-modified glass ionomer cement bond strength; glass ionomer cement; resin-modified glass ionomer cement

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Batu Eken, Z.; Ilie, N. A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam. Materials 2024, 17, 4853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194853

AMA Style

Batu Eken Z, Ilie N. A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam. Materials. 2024; 17(19):4853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194853

Chicago/Turabian Style

Batu Eken, Zeynep, and Nicoleta Ilie. 2024. "A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam" Materials 17, no. 19: 4853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194853

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop