Next Article in Journal
A Preliminary Investigation on a Water- and Acetone-Based Solvolysis Recycling Process for CFRPs
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Thin Lamination of Carbon Fiber Based on Mechanical Broadening
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Load Capacity of Screw Anchor Installed in Concrete Substrate Reinforced with Steel Fibers Depending on Fiber Content

Building Research Institute (ITB), ul. Filtrowa 1, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(5), 1105; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051105
Submission received: 9 January 2024 / Revised: 23 February 2024 / Accepted: 26 February 2024 / Published: 28 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Materials and Techniques for Reinforced Concrete)

Abstract

:
Pull-out strength tests conducted on screw anchors in uncracked concrete substrates of the C25/30 class are presented in this article. The destructive force for anchor–concrete fasting was tested, and in the next step, the average pull-out strengths of screw anchors in concrete substrates with and without the addition of steel fiber were determined. Currently, the pull-out strengths of anchors in fiber-reinforced concrete substrates are defined as for unreinforced concrete substrates. Therefore, pull-out tests were performed for screw anchors in fiber-reinforced concrete substrates. Fiber contents of 10, 20, 30, and 50 kg/m3 were used. An increase in the load capacity of screw anchors in a fiber-reinforced concrete substrate was demonstrated in a pull-out test compared to base samples without fibers. The coefficient related to the actual fastening behavior of a screw anchor in the fiber-reinforced concrete substrate was determined. It was assumed that a coefficient of 13.10 should be adopted. This was the lowest value obtained for the load capacity in this study for screw anchors in a fiber-reinforced concrete substrate.

1. Introduction

Each structure should be designed such that it fulfils its tasks in terms of usability, load-bearing capacity, and stability throughout its intended period of use without any significant reduction in its usefulness or excessive unforeseen maintenance costs. The development of civilization and its surprising pace require the use of various construction technologies. In a building’s structure, fastener elements play an important role in addition to purely structural elements. Anchors are used to enable quick and safe fastening of various types of structural and nonstructural building elements [1]. Thus, there are two types of anchors: anchors of a construction nature are used to connect elements of the structure of a facility or heavy elements of equipment (beams, columns, walls, stair supports, ventilated façade structures, drywall structures, windows, heavy chandeliers, furniture, etc.), and nonstructural anchors are used when additional light elements are installed (skirting boards, wall lamps, pictures, etc.).
Anchors are exposed to various factors during their installation and operation, such as the type and nature of the load transferred, the condition and strength of the substrate, and the temperature at which the anchors are installed and used. However, they are most often used in concrete substrates. This is consistent with the assessment of fasteners based on the EOTA (European Organisation for Technical Approvals) [2] and Eurocode 2 [3]. However, many researchers have tested the strength of fasteners depending on various conditions, such as the type of concrete, a non-cracked or cracked substrate [4,5,6,7,8], its carbonation [9,10,11,12,13], or additional impacts, including static and dynamic loads [14]. Ruopp et al. [15] investigated large anchor plates under shear loading in steel–concrete connections. However, Luo et al. [16] analyzed the connections of steel plates with concrete using anchors and adhesives in terms of shear performance. Woyciechowski et al. [13] examined the load-bearing capacity of steel fixing anchors depending on the condition of the concrete substrate, which was degraded as a result of carbonation, water absorption, and freezing.
Moreover, according to the EOTA [2] and Eurocode 2 [3], fastenings made in fiber-reinforced concrete elements were designed and implemented as typical concrete substrates. This does not correspond to the actual operating conditions of fasteners, which are often installed in elements made of fiber-reinforced concrete [10,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. An example is fiber-reinforced concrete floors [25,26,27]. Fiber-reinforced concrete is resistant to cracking and crack propagation (by bridging the fibers over the crack) [28,29]. Moreover, it is characterized by higher flexural strength, resistance to impact and fatigue, and good durability [11]. Fibers can improve the stiffness and durability of reinforced concrete and prestressed structures [12]. Owing to these properties, fiber-reinforced concrete is used in the construction of buildings, bridges, tunnels, and high-strength surfaces [18]. The most widely used fiber-reinforced concrete is concrete reinforced with steel fibers [13,30,31,32,33,34]. However, only a few studies have been conducted on anchorage in fiber-reinforced concrete [35,36,37,38]. The load-bearing capacity of anchors anchored in a substrate made of steel fiber-reinforced concrete has been shown to increase with the fiber content [36,37]. Lee et al. [36] obtained a linear correlation between load-bearing capacity and fiber content. Bokor et al. [37] obtained increases in load-bearing capacity of 22% and 37%, respectively, for steel fibers in the amounts of 30 kg/m3 and 50 kg/m3. However, Gesoglu et al. [38] found that the addition of steel fibers had no significant effect on the pull-out strength of anchors, but there was a reduction in concrete damage compared to plain concrete. Dudek et al. [35] analyzed the effect of the steel fiber content on the maximum pull-out force of M10 expansion anchors installed in concrete substrates (non-cracked and cracked with a crack width of 0.30 mm) reinforced with fibers. Two concrete classes (C20/25 and C50/60) and three steel fiber contents (15 kg/m3, 30 kg/m3, and 50 kg/m3) were used. The study presented in this article is a continuation of this research, the goal of which is to change the technical assessment procedure and the design system for the use of steel anchors in a fiber-reinforced concrete substrate and not in a concrete substrate as before. This study used a different type of anchor: steel screw anchors. This study aimed to assess the effect of reinforcement on the load capacity of screw anchors installed in concrete substrates (non-cracked) reinforced with fibers at different depths of anchoring.

2. Materials

2.1. Steel Anchors

This study used two types of screw anchors, TFE14120 and TFE14140 (Técnicas Expansivas S.L., Logroño (La Rioja), Spain), as shown in Figure 1.
Table 1 and Table 2 present the material and installation parameters of the anchors used, respectively, which are provided in accordance with the guidelines. The first connector, with a length of 120 mm, was screwed into the concrete to depths of 65 and 75 mm, while the second connector, with a length of 140 mm, was screwed into the concrete to depths of 85, 95, and 105 mm in holes 10 mm deeper (see Table 2). The holes were drilled using a drill with a diameter of 14 mm according to [39].
Table 1. The material parameters of the screw anchors (see Figure 2).
Table 1. The material parameters of the screw anchors (see Figure 2).
No.Type of Screw AnchorLength
L [mm]
Diameter
d [mm]
Nut Diameter
Sw [mm]
1TFE141201201719
2TFE141401401719

2.2. Concrete Substrate

The concrete substrate for the load capacity tests was made of a C25/30 concrete mixture in accordance with the EAD (European Assessment Document) [2] and the Eurocode standard [3] for steel anchors, as shown in Table 3.
Portland cement CEM I 42.5R was used according to PN-EN 197-1:2012 [40] (Górażdże Cement S.A., Chorula, Poland) (see Table 4 and Table 5). Moreover, to produce reinforced concrete substrates, steel fibers (Steelbet 50/0.75, Urban-Metal, Poland) were used (see Figure 3 and Table 6). Fiber contents of 10 kg/m3, 20 kg/m3, 30 kg/m3, and 50 kg/m3 were used.
Table 4. The chemical composition of the cement was measured as per PN-EN 196-2:2013-11 [41].
Table 4. The chemical composition of the cement was measured as per PN-EN 196-2:2013-11 [41].
CompositionSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOSO3Na2OK2OClLOIIR
Unit (vol.%)19.54.92.963.31.32.80.10.90.052.480.63
LOI—loss on ignition; IR—insoluble residue.
Table 5. The physical properties of the cement were measured according to PN-EN 196-6:2011 [42] and PN-EN 196-1:2016-07 [43].
Table 5. The physical properties of the cement were measured according to PN-EN 196-6:2011 [42] and PN-EN 196-1:2016-07 [43].
PropertiesSpecific Surface Area
[m2/kg]
Specific Gravity
[kg/m3]
Compressive Strength
[MPa]
MaterialAfter 2 DaysAfter 28 Days
Cement3840306028.058.0
Table 6. The physical and mechanical properties of the steel fibers are shown in Figure 4.
Table 6. The physical and mechanical properties of the steel fibers are shown in Figure 4.
Length of Fiber
L [mm]
Length
l [mm]
Diameter
d [mm]
Height
h [mm]
Tensile Strength
Rm, min [MPa]
504.00.75≥3.0100
After pouring the concrete mix with or without steel fibers, the concrete and steel fiber-reinforced substrates were stored for 28 d at a temperature of 21 ± 1 °C and a humidity above 95%. The substrates were then stored at a humidity of 60 ± 10% until testing. Screw anchors were installed in concrete substrates with or without fibers in the drill holes, and dcut was nominal.

3. Methodology

Pull-out strength tests were carried out 90 d after the production of the concrete substrate to approximate the actual working conditions [44,45]. Load-bearing capacity tests of steel anchors installed in a C25/30 class concrete substrate without dispersed reinforcement and with the addition of steel fibers were carried out in accordance with the requirements of the EOTA [2]. Pull-out strength tests of steel anchors installed in concrete and steel fiber-reinforced concrete substrates were carried out using the following equation:
-
The HBM force and displacement measurement device was compatible with the force, displacement, and pressure transducers. Data processing software from Hbm QuantumX–Catman II, operating in Windows, was used;
-
C6 A force sensors (HBM, Darmstadt, Germany) were used in the range from 0 kN to 200 kN, with a force measurement resolution of 0.01 kN and a sensitivity of 2 mV/V;
-
WA50 displacement sensors (HBM, Darmstadt, Germany) were used in the range of 0–50 mm, with a resolution of 0.01 mm, as shown in Figure 5.
The steel screw anchors were pulled out under the impact of static tensile forces, and the maximum destructive force was noted. The tests were performed on five samples. The load capacity (NRu,m) was determined according to Formula (1).
N R u , m = F R u , m t · f c k f c , t 0.5
where
F R u , m t —average maximum destructive force [kN];
fck—characteristic value of compressive strength of concrete substrate [MPa];
fc,t—determined compressive strength [MPa].
Screw anchors installed in concrete are shown in Figure 6. Installation consisted of drilling a hole into the base material of the correct diameter and depth using a drill bit that met the requirements. Dust and debris were removed from the hole using a hand pump, and compressed air or a vacuum was used to remove loose particles left from drilling. A powered impact wrench or a torque wrench that did not exceed the maximum torque was selected. An appropriately sized hex socket was attached to the wrench. A screw anchor head was mounted in the socket. The anchor was driven with an impact driver or torque wrench through the fixture and into the hole until the anchor head washer came in contact with the fixture. The anchor needed to be snug after installation.
After testing the pull-out strength of the anchors, cylindrical samples were taken from the concrete substrates with and without the addition of steel fibers according to [47,48]. The samples were tested using a MEGA 6-3000-100 compression machine (FORM + TEST, Riedlingen, Germany) with a maximum load capacity of 3000 kN. Compressive strength tests were performed on three samples with diameters of 105 mm and heights of 105 ± 1 mm per substrate according to the PN-EN 12504-1:2019-08 standard [48]. Moreover, tensile splitting tests of concrete samples with and without fibers were conducted. Tests were performed on three samples with diameters of 105 mm and heights of 210 ± 1 mm per substrate according to the PN-EN 12390-6:2011 standard [49].

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Mechanical Properties of the Concrete Substrate

Table 7 and Figure 7 present the results of the mechanical properties of the concrete substrate of the C25/30 class without fibers (base sample) and with the addition of steel fibers. Although the purpose of the fibers was not to increase the compressive strength [28,50], as the fiber content increased, the compressive strength increased (see Figure 7). The standard deviation of the compressive strength was approximately 1 MPa. Moreover, the effect of the fiber reinforcement of the concrete is visible in the failure image from the tensile splitting strength test (Figure 8).

4.2. The Results of the Pull-Out Test

The results of the pull-out tests of the screw anchors installed in the concrete substrates of the C25/30 class without fibers and with the addition of fibers are listed in Table 8. An increase in the average maximum destructive force was observed depending on the fiber content in the concrete mixture of the substrate.
The greatest effect of fiber addition was observed for an effective depth of 45 mm, followed by an effective depth of 79 mm. Figure 9 presents the characteristic failure mode of screw anchors in fiber-reinforced concrete observed in the pull-out tests. This was different from that observed for unreinforced substrates [22,51,52].
In the first case, the maximum destructive force increased by approximately 3%, 13%, 17%, and 25% compared to the reference sample for steel fiber contents of 10, 20, 30, and 50 kg/m3, respectively. In the second case, the destructive force increased by approximately 3%, 8%, 15%, and 21%, respectively. For the remaining effective depths, the increases in the maximum destructive force with the steel fiber content were not spectacular and amounted to approximately 1–2%, 5–7%, 9%, and 12–15% compared to the reference sample for steel fiber contents of 10, 20, 30, and 50 kg/m3, respectively. Therefore, a significant improvement in the value of the maximum destructive force was obtained with the steel fiber content in the concrete substrate. This may be related to the increase in the strength of the steel fiber-reinforced substrate, as shown in Figure 7. Figure 10 presents a linear correlation between the average destructive force of the screw anchors and the compressive strength of the concrete substrate with and without the addition of steel fibers, which depends on the effective depth.
In the next step, the load capacity was determined according to Equation (1). The results are shown in Figure 11. A linear correlation between the load capacity of screw anchors installed in the fiber-reinforced concrete substrate and the effective depth was determined, which was consistent with previous test results, for example, for expansion connectors [35,46]. However, it can be observed that the effect of the fiber content on the load capacity for a given effective depth was slight. For higher effective depths, a greater effect of the steel fiber content on the load capacity of the screwed anchor was observed.
Figure 12 shows the correlation between the load capacity and the steel fiber content depending on the effective depth. It is possible to notice a smaller effect of the fiber content on the load capacity of screw anchors for effective depths of 54 mm and 62 mm, which is visible in the flattening of the curve. At higher effective depths, a greater impact of the steel fiber content on the load capacity of the screwed anchor was observed. The difference in load capacity was up to 20% for anchors with a length of 120 mm (anchor 1), for which the effective depth was 45 mm, and up to 13% for anchors with a length of 140 mm (anchor 2), for which the effective depth was 79 mm. However, for effective depths of 54 mm (anchor 1) and 62 mm (anchor 2), this difference was approximately 8%, and for an effective depth of 71 mm (anchor 2), it was 10%.
Figure 12 presents a linear correlation for all analyzed effective depths. Pearson coefficients above 0.9 were obtained for all correlations, which indicates a good fit for the curves.
The fasteners of the mechanical anchors were designed in accordance with the Concrete Capacity Method specified in the PN-EN 1992-4 standard [3]. The characteristic values of the load capacity of the anchors installed in the concrete substrate (NRk,p) can be calculated according to Formula (2).
N R k , p = k u c r , N · h e f 1.5 · f c k 0.5
where
kucr,N—correction factor [-] according to Eurocode [3];
hef—effective depth of fasting screw anchor in the concrete substrate [mm];
fck—characteristic value of compressive strength of concrete substrate [MPa].
Based on the obtained results of the pull-out test for the screw anchors installed in the concrete substrates (with and without the addition of steel fiber), the characteristic value of the load capacity (NRk,p) for each case can be determined according to Formula (3).
N R k , p = N R u , m · 1 k s · ν F
where
ks—coefficient for a tolerance level of 95% (defectiveness level of 5%) and a confidence level of 90%, depending on the sample size;
ν F —coefficient of variation calculated according to Formula (4).
ν F = s F R u , m · 100
where
s—standard deviation.
The results for the characteristic value of the load capacity of the screw anchors in the concrete substrates with and without the addition of steel fiber, determined based on Formula (3), are presented in Figure 13.
Based on Formula (2) and the characteristic value of the load capacity (NRk,p) calculated from the results obtained in laboratory tests for non-cracked concrete substrates with the addition of steel fibers, the kucr,N coefficient was determined. The results of the kucr,N coefficient for different steel fiber contents are listed in Table 9.
The lowest value of kucr,N, with a coefficient of 13.10, was obtained. Therefore, this value of the kucr,N coefficient is recommended for Steelbet 50/0.75 fibers.
The lower kucr,N coefficient from Table 9 can be taken into account when assessing the safety of a building structure. This value of the kucr,N coefficient is recommended as a reference value for determining the characteristic value of the load capacity of screw anchors installed in a non-cracked concrete substrate of class C25/30 with the addition of Steelbet 50/0.75 fibers, based on Formula (2).

5. Summary and Conclusions

This study aimed to assess the possibility of using screw anchors installed in concrete substrates of class C25/30 without fibers and with the addition of steel fibers (10 kg/m3, 20 kg/m3, 30 kg/m3, and 50 kg/m3). Different values of effective depth were used (45, 54, 62, 71, and 79 mm). The following conclusions can be drawn based on the results of this experimental study:
  • Steel fibers affect the destructive force of screw anchors, increasing the pull-out strength for each effective depth.
  • A significant improvement in the value of the maximum destructive force was obtained for the concrete substrate with the addition of steel fiber.
  • With increasing effective depth (effective depth (hef) = 45 mm–79 mm), the destructive force of screw anchors increases; this correlation is linear for screw anchors installed in concrete substrates without fiber and with the addition of fiber.
  • To calculate the characteristic value of the load capacity of screw anchors in the fiber-reinforced concrete substrate with the addition of steel fiber, a kucr,N coefficient of 13.10 can be used. This was the lowest value obtained in this study for the load capacities of screw anchors in the fiber-reinforced concrete substrate.
This study is part of a wider research project aimed at assessing the actual load capacities of fasteners in steel fiber-reinforced concrete substrates. A novelty is the testing of screws screwed into steel fiber-reinforced substrates. So far, tests have been conducted for expansion and bonded anchors. As this research continues, testing of other types and contents of steel fibers is planned.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K. and K.K.; investigation, A.K.; data curation, D.D.; formal analysis, D.D.; resources, A.K., D.D., and K.K.; supervision, K.K.; validation, K.K.; visualization, A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.; writing—review and editing, D.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding other than the statutory research of a particular scientific unit.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dudek, D. Influence of Variable Loads of Expansion Fasteners on Their Load Capacity in Cracked Concrete Substrate. Ph.D. Thesis, Research Building Institute (ITB), Warsaw, Poland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. EAD 330232-01-0601; Mechanical Fasteners for Use in Concrete. EOTA European Assessment Document: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.
  3. PN-EN 1992-4:2018-11; Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 4: Design of Fasteners for Use in Concrete. PKN: Warsaw, Poland, 2018.
  4. Mahrenholtz, C.; Ayoubi, M.; Müller, S.; Bachschmid, S. Tension and shear performance of anchor channels with channel bolts cast in Fibre Reinforced Concrete (FRC). IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 615, 012089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dudek, D.; Kadela, M. Pull-Out Strength of Resin Anchors in Non-cracked and Cracked Concrete and Masonry Substrates. Proc. Eng. 2016, 161, 864–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schwenn, M.; Voit, K.; Zeman, O.; Bergmeister, K. Post-installed mechanical fasteners in high strength and ultra-high strength performance concrete. Civ. Eng. Des. 2019, 1, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmed, L.T.; Braimah, A. Behaviour of undercut anchors subjected to high strain rate loading. Proc. Eng. 2017, 210, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, X.; Tian, S. Load transfer mechanism and critical length of anchorage zone for anchor bolt. PLoS ONE 2010, 15, e0227539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Woyciechowski, P.; Sokołowska, J.J.; Chondzyński, M. Influence of the condition of the concrete substrate on the steel fixing anchors load capacity. In Proceedings of Conference Dni Betonu; Stowarzyszenie Producentów Cementu: Wisła, Poland, 2018; pp. 207–221. Available online: https://www.dnibetonu.com/wp-content/pdfs/2018/woyciechowski_sokolowska_chondzynski.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2023).
  10. Małek, M.; Łasica, W.; Kadela, M.; Kluczyński, J.; Dudek, D. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene Fibre-Reinforced Cement–Glass Composite. Materials 2021, 14, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gribniak, V.; Arnautov, A.; Norkus, A.; Kliukas, R.; Tamulenas, V.; Gudonis, E.; Sokolov, A. Steel Fibres: Effective Way to Prevent Failure of the Concrete Bonded with FRP Sheets. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2016, 4913536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bonopera, M.; Chang, K.-C.; Lin, T.-K.; Tullini, N. Influence of prestressing on the behavior of uncracked concrete beams with a parabolic bonded tendon. Struct. Eng. Mech. 2021, 77, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, J.-M.; Yoo, D.-Y.; Kim, Y.-C.; Yoon, Y.-S. Mechanical Properties of Steam Cured High-Strength Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete with High-Volume Blast Furnace Slag. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2017, 11, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dudek, D.; Knap, P.; Kadela, M. Nośność łączników w podłożach betonowych zarysowanych wskutek oddziaływania eksploatacji górniczej. Bezpieczeństwo Pr. i Ochr. Sr. w Górnictwie 2015, 10, 23–27. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ruopp, J.; Kuhlmann, U. Steel-to-concrete joints with large anchor plates under shear loading. Steel Constr. 2017, 10, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luo, Y.; Wu, B. Shear performance of steel plate-concrete joints connected with anchors and adhesive. J. Adhes. 2020, 98, 889–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Panzera, T.H.; Christoforo, A.L.; Ribeiro Borges, P.H. 15—High performance fibre-reinforced concrete (FRC) for civil engineering applications. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering. Advanced Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Structural Applications; Bai, J., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2013; pp. 552–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Błaszczyński, T.; Przybylska-Fałek, M. Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete as a Structural Material. Proc. Eng. 2015, 122, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Małek, M.; Jackowski, M.; Łasica, W.; Kadela, M.; Wachowski, M. Mechanical and Material Properties of Mortar Reinforced with Glass Fiber: An Experimental Study. Materials 2021, 14, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Małek, M.; Jackowski, M.; Łasica, W.; Kadela, M. Influence of Polypropylene, Glass and Steel Fiber on the Thermal Properties of Concrete. Materials 2021, 14, 1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mohammed, A.A.; Rahim, A.A.F. Experimental behavior and analysis of high strength concrete beams reinforced with PET waste fiber. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 244, 118350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Małek, M.; Jackowski, M.; Łasica, W.; Kadela, M. Characteristics of Recycled Polypropylene Fibers as an Addition to Concrete Fabrication Based on Portland Cement. Materials 2020, 13, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ardhira, P.J.; Ardra, R.; Harika, M.; Sathyan, D. Study on fibre reinforced foam concrete-a review. Mat. Tod. Proc. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Małek, M.; Kadela, M.; Terpiłowski, M.; Szewczyk, T.; Łasica, W.; Muzolf, P. Effect of Metal Lathe Waste Addition on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Concrete. Materials 2021, 14, 2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nguyen, N.T.; Bui, T.-T.; Bui, Q.-B. Fiber reinforced concrete for slabs without steel rebar reinforcement: Assessing the feasibility for 3D-printed individual houses. Case Stud. Constr. Mat. 2022, 16, e00950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chajec, A.; Sadowski, Ł. The Effect of Steel and Polypropylene Fibers on the Properties of Horizontally Formed Concrete. Materials 2020, 13, 5827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kadela, M.; Kozłowski, M. Foamed concrete layer as sub-structure of industrial concrete floor. Proc. Eng. 2016, 161, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Glinicki, M.A. Beton ze zbrojeniem strukturalnym. In Proceedings of the Conference XXV Ogólnopolskie Warsztaty Pracy Projektanta Konstrukcji (WPPK’2010); PZITB: Szczyrk, Poland, 2010; pp. 279–308. Available online: https://www.ippt.pan.pl/repository/open/o70.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2023).
  29. Jasiczak, J.; Zieliński, K. Projektowane i rzeczywiste cechy mechaniczne betonowej posadzki przemysłowej zbrojonej włóknami stalowymi. Mat. Bud. 2017, 9, 28–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yao, J.; Zhou, Z.; Zhou, H. Highway Engineering Composite Material and Its Application; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kore, S.; Joshi, S. Experiments on the Workability of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete. In Advances in Civil Engineering and Infrastructural Development. Select Proceedings of ICRACEID 2019; Gupta, L.M., Ray, M.R., Labhasetwar, P.K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 627–635. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lehner, P.; Horňáková, M.; Hrabová, K. Sensitivity Analysis of Stochastic Calculation of SCC Regarding Aggressive Environment. Materials 2021, 14, 6838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shi, K.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, T.; Li, P.; Zhu, J.; Li, L. Seismic Performance of Steel Fiber Reinforced High–Strength Concrete Beam–Column Joints. Materials 2021, 14, 3235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jiang, F.; Deng, M.; Mo, L.; Wu, W. Effects of MgO Expansive Agent and Steel Fiber on Crack Resistance of a Bridge Deck. Materials 2020, 13, 3274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dudek, D.; Kadela, M.; Małek, M. Effect Steel Fibre Content on the Load-Carrying Capacity of Fibre-Reinforced Concrete Expansion Anchor. Materials 2021, 14, 7757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, J.-H.; Choi, E.; Cho, B.-S. Shear Failure Mode and Concrete Edge Breakout Resistance of Cast-In-Place Anchors in Steel Fiber-Reinforced Normal Strength Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bokor, B.; Tóth, M.; Sharma, A. Fasteners in Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Subjected to Increased Loading Rates. Fibers 2018, 6, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gesoglu, M.; Ozturan, T.; Özel, M.; Güneyisi, E. Tensile Behavior of Post-Installed Anchors in Plain and Steel Fiber-Reinforced Normal-and High-Strength Concretes. ACI Struct. J. 2005, 102, 224–231. Available online: https://www.concrete.org/publications/internationalconcreteabstractsportal/m/details/id/14273 (accessed on 9 December 2023).
  39. Available online: https://www.indexfix.com (accessed on 3 August 2023).
  40. PN-EN 197-1:2012; Cement—Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. PKN: Warsaw, Poland, 2012.
  41. PN-EN 196-2:2013-11; Methods of Testing Cement—Part 2: Chemical Analysis of Cement. PKN: Warsaw, Poland, 2013.
  42. PN-EN 196-6:2011; Methods of Testing Cement—Part 6: Determination of Fineness. PKN: Warsaw, Poland, 2011.
  43. PN-EN 196-1:2016-07; Methods of Testing Cement—Part 1: Determination of Strength. PKN: Warsaw, Poland, 2016.
  44. RILEM Technical Committee TC-242-MDC. X1 RILEM draft recommendation: TC-242-MDC multi-decade creep and shrinkage of concrete: Material model and structural analysis. Model B4 for creep, drying shrinkage and autogenous shrinkage of normal and high-strength concretes with multi-decade applicability. Mater. Struct. 2015, 48, 753–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jhatial, A.A. Synergic influence of degrading mechanisms and induced loading by prestressing on the concrete: State of the art. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 3184–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Konieczny, K.; Dudek, D.; Kukiełka, A. Expansion and Bonded Anchors in (Shallow) Fixings in Concrete Substrate Reinforced with Steel and Polypropylene Fibres. Procedia Eng. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar]
  47. Czarnecki, L. (Ed.) Concrete according to the PN-EN 206-1 Standard—Commenary [Beton Według Normy PN-EN 206-1—Komentarz]; Polish Cement [Polski Cement]: Krakau, Poland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  48. PN-EN 12504-1:2019-08; Testing Concrete in Structures—Part 1: Cored Specimens—Taking, Examining and Testing in Compression. PKN: Warsaw, Poland, 2019.
  49. PN-EN 12390-6:2011; Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 6: Tensile Splitting Strength of Test Specimens. PKN: Warsaw, Poland, 2011.
  50. Giresini, L.; Puppio, M.L.; Taddei, F. Experimental pull-out tests and design indications for strength anchors installed in masonry walls. Mater. Struct. 2020, 53, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Farhat, M.; Issa, M.; Prado, B.F.J. Pull-Out Behavior of Headed Anchors Used in a Totally Prefabricated Counterfort Retaining Wall System. PCI J. 2019, 64, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Czarnecki, R.M.; Manrique, M.A.; Samaddar, S.K. Ultimate Load Capacities of Expansion Anchor Bolts. J. Energy Eng. 1993, 119, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TFE14120 (bottom) and TFE14140 (top) steel screw anchors [photo taken by authors].
Figure 1. TFE14120 (bottom) and TFE14140 (top) steel screw anchors [photo taken by authors].
Materials 17 01105 g001
Figure 2. Geometry of steel screw anchors used [39].
Figure 2. Geometry of steel screw anchors used [39].
Materials 17 01105 g002
Figure 3. Steel fibers (SFs) used [photo taken by authors].
Figure 3. Steel fibers (SFs) used [photo taken by authors].
Materials 17 01105 g003
Figure 4. Geometry of the steel fibers (SFs) used.
Figure 4. Geometry of the steel fibers (SFs) used.
Materials 17 01105 g004
Figure 5. The test stand for anchor fastening. (a) Diagram of the test: 1—force sensor, 2—actuator, 3—support, 4—displacement sensor, 5—socket, 6—concrete, 7—screw anchor [46]. (b) Special test station [35].
Figure 5. The test stand for anchor fastening. (a) Diagram of the test: 1—force sensor, 2—actuator, 3—support, 4—displacement sensor, 5—socket, 6—concrete, 7—screw anchor [46]. (b) Special test station [35].
Materials 17 01105 g005
Figure 6. Screw anchor installation [39].
Figure 6. Screw anchor installation [39].
Materials 17 01105 g006
Figure 7. Ninety-day compressive strengths of concrete substrates with and without the addition of steel fibers.
Figure 7. Ninety-day compressive strengths of concrete substrates with and without the addition of steel fibers.
Materials 17 01105 g007
Figure 8. Images of the destruction of samples taken from the concrete substrates without (a) and with the addition of 10% steel fibers (b) after the tensile splitting strength test.
Figure 8. Images of the destruction of samples taken from the concrete substrates without (a) and with the addition of 10% steel fibers (b) after the tensile splitting strength test.
Materials 17 01105 g008
Figure 9. The characteristic failure mode of the connection was observed with the test screw anchors in fiber-reinforced concrete.
Figure 9. The characteristic failure mode of the connection was observed with the test screw anchors in fiber-reinforced concrete.
Materials 17 01105 g009
Figure 10. The correlation between the average destructive force of the screw anchors and the 90-day compressive strength of the concrete substrate with and without the addition of steel fibers, which depends on the effective depth (hef).
Figure 10. The correlation between the average destructive force of the screw anchors and the 90-day compressive strength of the concrete substrate with and without the addition of steel fibers, which depends on the effective depth (hef).
Materials 17 01105 g010
Figure 11. The correlation between the load capacity and the effective depth, hef, depends on the fiber content in the concrete substrate.
Figure 11. The correlation between the load capacity and the effective depth, hef, depends on the fiber content in the concrete substrate.
Materials 17 01105 g011
Figure 12. Correlation between load capacity and fiber content in concrete substrate depending on effective depth (hef).
Figure 12. Correlation between load capacity and fiber content in concrete substrate depending on effective depth (hef).
Materials 17 01105 g012
Figure 13. Summary of the results of the characteristic value of the load capacity of screw anchors in fiber-reinforced concrete substrates depending on the effective depth (hef).
Figure 13. Summary of the results of the characteristic value of the load capacity of screw anchors in fiber-reinforced concrete substrates depending on the effective depth (hef).
Materials 17 01105 g013
Table 2. Installation parameters of the screw anchors used.
Table 2. Installation parameters of the screw anchors used.
No.Type of Screw AnchorDrill Diameter
d0 [mm]
Drill Depth
h1 [mm]
Embedment Depth
hnom [mm]
Effective Depth
hef [mm]
1TFE1412014756545
857554
2TFE14140958562
1059571
11510579
Table 3. Composite concrete mix [1 m3].
Table 3. Composite concrete mix [1 m3].
Type of CompositeCompositeDensity [kg/m3]Content [kg]
AggregateSand 0/22660747
AggregateGravel 2/82640362
AggregateGravel 8/162630811
Portland cementCEM I 42.5R3060292
WaterTap water998153
AdmixtureMasterPozzolith BV 18C (0.40% of cement mass)10951.16
AdmixtureSikament 400/30 (0.70% of cement mass)10802.04
Table 7. Strength results of the concrete substrate.
Table 7. Strength results of the concrete substrate.
No.Fiber Content
[kg/m3]
Average Compressive StrengthAverage Tensile Splitting Strength
fc,t [MPa]fc,t [MPa]
1Reference sample37.1 ± 0.83.15 ± 0.12
21036.8 ± 1.03.18 ± 0.14
32037.9 ± 1.13.34 ± 0.21
43038.8 ± 1.23.58 ± 0.18
55040.2 ± 1.34.38 ± 0.21
Table 8. Results of pull-out test depending on effective depth.
Table 8. Results of pull-out test depending on effective depth.
No.Fiber Content
[kg/m3]
Average Maximum Destructive Force
F R u , m t [kN]
Effective Depth
hef [mm]
4552627179
1Reference sample28.45 ± 1.1239.89 ± 2.3149.34 ± 2.1059.10 ± 3.2369.23 ± 2.67
21029.39 ± 1.9739.94 ± 2.3749.72 ± 3.3560.11 ± 3.6771.24 ± 3.60
32032.17 ± 1.6141.77 ± 2.4151.60 ± 2.5563.21 ± 3.2475.07 ± 2.88
43033.25 ± 1.1043.12 ± 3.2153.69 ± 3.1265.73 ± 3.3979.34 ± 4.17
55035.59 ± 2.1644.73 ± 2.7755.38 ± 3.0867.84 ± 3.4181.60 ± 3.34
Table 9. Designated values of the kucr,N coefficient.
Table 9. Designated values of the kucr,N coefficient.
Fiber Content [kg/m3]
10203050
kucr,N coefficient13.1014.3214.4514.77
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Konieczny, K.; Dudek, D.; Kukiełka, A. Load Capacity of Screw Anchor Installed in Concrete Substrate Reinforced with Steel Fibers Depending on Fiber Content. Materials 2024, 17, 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051105

AMA Style

Konieczny K, Dudek D, Kukiełka A. Load Capacity of Screw Anchor Installed in Concrete Substrate Reinforced with Steel Fibers Depending on Fiber Content. Materials. 2024; 17(5):1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Konieczny, Kazimierz, Daniel Dudek, and Alfred Kukiełka. 2024. "Load Capacity of Screw Anchor Installed in Concrete Substrate Reinforced with Steel Fibers Depending on Fiber Content" Materials 17, no. 5: 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051105

APA Style

Konieczny, K., Dudek, D., & Kukiełka, A. (2024). Load Capacity of Screw Anchor Installed in Concrete Substrate Reinforced with Steel Fibers Depending on Fiber Content. Materials, 17(5), 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop