Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Endodontic Posts with Different Diameters
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Tooth Selection and Specimen Preparation
2.2. Post-Space Preparation and Post Cementation
2.3. Slicing of the Specimens for the Push-Out Test
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Schwartz, R.S.; Robbins, J.W. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. J. Endod. 2004, 30, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fennis, W.M.; Kuijs, R.H.; Kreulen, C.M.; Roeters, F.J.; Creugers, N.H.; Burgersdijk, R.C. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2002, 15, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hood, J. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials; Vanherle, G.S.D., Ed.; Peter Szulc Publishing: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1985; pp. 443–450. [Google Scholar]
- Zarow, M.; Ramírez-Sebastià, A.; Paolone, G.; Porta, J.d.R.; Mora, J.; Espona, J.; Durán-Sindreu, F.; Roig, M. A new classification system for the restoration of root filled teeth. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51, 318–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peroz, I.; Blankenstein, F.; Lange, K.P.; Naumann, M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores—A review. Quintessence Int. 2005, 36, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Johnson, W.T. Color Atlas of Endodontics, 1st ed.; W. B. Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2002; pp. 140–144. [Google Scholar]
- Gulabivala, K.; Ng, Y.L. Factors that affect the outcomes of root canal treatment and retreatment—A reframing of the principles. Int. Endod. J. 2023, 56 (Suppl. S2), 82–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goracci, C.; Ferrari, M. Current perspectives on post systems: A literature review. Aust. Dent. J. 2011, 56, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Shu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, B.; Jian, Y.; Zhao, K. Evaluation of fiber posts vs metal posts for restoring severely damaged endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int. 2019, 50, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Martins, M.D.; Junqueira, R.B.; de Carvalho, R.F.; Lacerda, M.F.L.S.; Faé, D.S.; Lemos, C.A.A. Is a fiber post better than a metal post for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2021, 112, 103750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsintsadze, N.; Margvelashvili-Malament, M.; Natto, Z.S.; Ferrari, M. Comparing survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored either with glass-fiber-reinforced or metal posts: A systematic review and meta-analyses. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2022. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grandini, S.; Goracci, C.; Monticelli, F.; Tay, F.R.; Ferrari, M. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: Three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent. Mater. 2005, 21, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galhano, G.A.; Valandro, L.F.; de Melo, R.M.; Scotti, R.; Bottino, M.A. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts. J. Endod. 2005, 31, 209–211. [Google Scholar]
- Chandra, A. Discuss the factors that affect the outcome of endodontic treatment. Aust. Endod. J. 2009, 35, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhuva, B.; Giovarruscio, M.; Rahim, N.; Bitter, K.; Mannocci, F. The restoration of root filled teeth: A review of the clinical literature. Int. Endod. J. 2021, 54, 509–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo Giudice, G.; Ferrari Cagidiaco, E.; Lo Giudice, R.; Puleio, F.; Nicita, F.; Calapaj, M. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of a Hollow Endodontic Post by Three Point Test and SEM Analysis: A Pilot Study. Materials 2019, 12, 1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mosharraf, R.; Haerian, A. Push-out bond strength of a fiber post system with two resin cements. Dent. Res. J. 2011, 8 (Suppl. S1), S88–S93. [Google Scholar]
- Pereira, J.R.; Pamato, S.; Santini, M.F.; Porto, V.C.; Ricci, W.A.; Só, M.V.R. Push-out bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented with adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements according to the root canal surface. Saudi Dent. J. 2021, 33, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goracci, C.; Tavares, A.U.; Fabianelli, A.; Monticelli, F.; Raffaelli, O.; Cardoso, P.C.; Tay, F.; Ferrari, M. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: Comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2004, 112, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habib, S.R.; Ansari, A.S.; Khan, A.S.; Alamro, N.M.; Alzaaqi, M.A.; Alkhunefer, Y.A.; AlHelal, A.A.; Alnassar, T.M.; Alqahtani, A.S. Push-Out Bond Strength of Endodontic Posts Cemented to Extracted Teeth: An In-Vitro Evaluation. Materials 2022, 15, 6792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Freitas, T.L.; Vitti, R.P.; Miranda, M.E.; Brandt, W.C. Effect of Glass Fiber Post Adaptation on Push-Out Bond Strength to Root Dentin. Braz. Dent. J. 2019, 30, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mirmohammadi, H.; Gerges, E.; Salameh, Z.; Wesselink, P.R. Effect of post diameter and cement thickness on bond strength of fiber posts. Quintessence Int. 2013, 44, 801–810. [Google Scholar]
- Latempa, A.M.; Almeida, S.A.; Nunes, N.F.; da Silva, E.M.; Guimarães, J.G.; Poskus, L.T. Techniques for restoring enlarged canals: An evaluation of fracture resistance and bond strength. Int. Endod. J. 2015, 48, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Druck, C.C.; Bergoli, C.D.; Pereira, G.K.; Valandro, L.F. Effect of two resin cements and two fiber post surface treatments on push-out bond strength between fiber post and root dentin. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2015, 16, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
- Das, A.K.; Muddugangadhar, B.C.; Amarnath, G.S.; Garg, A.; Kumar, U.; Rao, T.R. Comparative Evaluation of Push Out Bond Strength of a Fiber Post System using Four Different Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study. J. Int. Oral. Health 2015, 7 (Suppl. S1), 62–67. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y.; Kim, J.; Shin, Y. Push-Out Bond Strength Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin Post Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Using Different Adhesive Bonding Systems. Materials 2021, 14, 3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giachetti, L.; Scaminaci Russo, D.; Baldini, M.; Bertini, F.; Steier, L.; Ferrari, M. Push-out strength of translucent fibre posts cemented using a dual-curing technique or a light-curing self-adhering material. Int. Endod. J. 2012, 45, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arisu, H.D.; Kivanç, B.H.; Sağlam, B.C.; Şimşek, E.; Görgül, G. Effect of post-space treatments on the push-out bond strength and failure modes of glass fibre posts. Aust. Endod. J. 2013, 39, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Cai, Q.; Li, Y.; Wei, X.Y.; Huang, Z.; Wang, X.Z. Effect on push-out bond strength of glass-fiber posts functionalized with polydopamine using different adhesives. J. Adhes. Dent. 2014, 16, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Mastoras, K.; Vasiliadis, L.; Koulaouzidou, E.; Gogos, C. Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two endodontic post systems. J. Endod. 2012, 38, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ha, W.N.; Chaves, G.S.; Decurcio, D.; Estrela, C.; Peters, O.A.; Rossi-Fedele, G. Remaining dentinal thickness after simulated post space preparation and the fit of prefabricated posts to root canal preparation shapes. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2021, 152, 1020–1032.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kadam, A.; Pujar, M.; Patil, C. Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro. J. Conserv. Dent. 2013, 16, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Group Number | 1 (1.0 mm) | 2 (1.2 mm) | 3 (1.5 mm) | 4 (2.0 mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ø 0.7 mm reamer | + | + | + | + |
Ø 1.0 mm drill | + | + | + | + |
Ø 1.2 mm drill | - | + | + | + |
Ø 1.5 mm drill | - | - | + | + |
Ø 2.0 mm drill | - | - | - | + |
Pin diameters (mm) | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.0 | |
Fibre-reinforced post diameters (mm) | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
Root sections | A | B | C |
Section/Diameter | 1.0 mm | 1.2 mm | 1.5 mm | 2.0 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
“A” section | 4.43 | 5.25 | 6.32 | 7.58 |
“B” section | 5.94 | 6.98 | 8.08 | 9.34 |
“C” section | 6.28 | 7.54 | 9.32 | 11.06 |
Peak Force (N) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Section/Diameter | 1.0 mm | 1.2 mm | 1.5 mm | 2.0 mm |
“A” section | 97.58 ± 19.45 | 85.70 ± 12.18 | 74.16 ± 16.59 | 85.46 ± 10.45 |
“B” section | 95.42 ± 14.54 | 110.66 ± 6.55 | 125.40 ± 20.69 | 136.82 ± 16.13 |
“C” section | 106.64 ± 8.92 | 104.72 ± 7.96 | 109.53 ± 13.77 | 110.13 ± 22.30 |
Average | 99.98 ± 8.05 | 101.00 ± 5.39 | 103.80 ± 10.32 | 111.99 ± 10.40 |
Mean Push-Out Bond Strength (MPa) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Section/Diameter | 1.0 mm | 1.2 mm | 1.5 mm | 2.0 mm |
“A” section | 22.03 ± 4.39 | 16.32 ± 2.32 | 11.73 ± 2.63 | 11.27 ± 1.38 |
“B” section | 16.06 ± 2.45 | 15.85 ± 0.94 | 15.52 ± 2.56 | 14.65 ± 1.73 |
“C” section | 16.98 ± 1.42 | 13.89 ± 1.06 | 11.75 ± 1.48 | 9.96 ± 2.02 |
Average | 18.20 ± 1.67 | 15.31 ± 0.85 | 12.86 ± 1.23 | 12.08 ± 1.05 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rajnics, Z.; Pammer, D.; Kőnig-Péter, A.; Turzó, K.; Marada, G.; Radnai, M. Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Endodontic Posts with Different Diameters. Materials 2024, 17, 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071492
Rajnics Z, Pammer D, Kőnig-Péter A, Turzó K, Marada G, Radnai M. Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Endodontic Posts with Different Diameters. Materials. 2024; 17(7):1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071492
Chicago/Turabian StyleRajnics, Zsolt, Dávid Pammer, Anikó Kőnig-Péter, Kinga Turzó, Gyula Marada, and Márta Radnai. 2024. "Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Endodontic Posts with Different Diameters" Materials 17, no. 7: 1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071492