Next Article in Journal
Crushing Response and Optimization of a Modified 3D Re-Entrant Honeycomb
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and High-Temperature Resistance Properties of Phenolic Resin/Phosphate Hybrid Coatings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 17
Issue 9
10.3390/ma17092082
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Temperature, Ionic Strength and Humic Acid on the Transport of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles in Geosynthetic Clay Liner

by
Yaohui Liu
1,* and
Tao Jiang
2
1
School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221000, China
2
Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(9), 2082; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092082
Submission received: 20 March 2024 / Revised: 13 April 2024 / Accepted: 22 April 2024 / Published: 28 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Carbon Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With the wide application of graphene oxide nanoparticles (GONPs), a great amount of GONP waste is discarded and concentrated in landfills. It has been proven that GONPs have strong toxicity and could gather toxic substances due to their high adsorption capacity. GONPs will seriously pollute the surrounding environment if they leak through the geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) in landfills. To investigate various factors (temperature, ionic strength (IS) and humic acid (HA)) on the transport and retention of GONPs in the GCL, a self-designed apparatus was created and column tests were carried out. The experimental results show that GONPs could be transported through the GCL. The mobility and sorption ratio of GONPs in GCL decreased with an increase in temperature and IS, and increased with an increase in HA. The temperature had little effect on the deposition ratio of GONPs in the GCL. The deposition ratio of GONPs in the GCL increased with IS, and decreased with an increase in HA. The transport of GONPs in GCL, glass beads and quartz sand was compared, and the results show that the retention ability of the GCL is much better than other porous materials. The experimental results could provide significant references for the pollution treatment in landfills.

1. Introduction

With the wide application of nanometer materials, increasing nanometer wastes are produced. Reports show that the total output of nanometer materials in the world is 260,000~309,000 tons, and 63~91% of these materials are discarded in landfills [1]. Previous studies have proven that nanoparticles pose a serious risk to the environment [2,3,4]. Barlaz et al. [5] and Khan et al. [6] found that nanoparticles could be transported into the interior of landfills, and this aggravated the pollution of nanometer particles.
Graphene oxide nanoparticles (GONPs) are one of the most widely used nanoparticles. Kamenska et al. [7] investigated the impact of polyethylene glycol functionalization of graphene oxide on anticoagulation and the hemolytic properties of human blood. Li et al. [8] investigated the application of graphene oxide composite catalysts for high-efficiency and bifunctional catalysts for photocatalytic dye degradation and hydrogenation. A great number of GONPs were released into the environment during the industrial cycle and finally concentrated in landfills [9,10]. GONPs have been proven to have strong toxicity [11,12] and adsorption capacity [13] and thereby could gather toxic substances in landfills. Dibyanshu et al. [14] investigated the possibility of GONPs becoming an emerging contaminant in groundwater and proposed the corresponding treatment strategy. Additionally, the mobility of GONPs was greater than that of other nanoparticles due to their high water solubility and stability, resulting in the serious harm of GONP leakage into landfills [15]. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the transport and leakage of GONPs in landfills.
Many researchers have investigated the transport of GONPs in porous media [16,17,18]. Many factors, e.g., humic acid (HA) [19,20], ionic strength (IS) [21] and pH [22,23], have been proven to have an influence on the transport of GONPs in porous media. Cao et al. [24] proved that the mobility of GONPs is highly sensitive to ionic strength and pH. Wang et al. [25] investigated the co-transport of GONPs and hematite colloids (a model representative of iron oxides) in saturated sand through column experiments. The results demonstrated that the presence of hematite colloids inhibited GONP transport in quartz sand columns. The temperature inside the landfill is significantly higher than the normal temperature in nature. This is because the chemical substances inside the landfill will react to produce heat. Additionally, heat is difficult to emit because the landfill is buried underground. High temperatures may have a serious impact on the migration of GONPs. However, studies on the effect of temperature on the transport of GONPs are still rare.
The transport of GONPs in various porous media such as silica sand [26,27], glass bead [28] and loess [29] has been observed by many researchers, and the results showed that the types of media have a significant influence on the transport of GONPs. Chen et al. [30] investigated the effects of low-molecular-weight organic acids (LMWOAs) on the transport of GONPs in saturated kaolinite- and goethite-coated sand columns. Esfahani et al. [31] evaluated the effect of co-transport of different-sized microorganisms on graphene oxide nanoparticle (GONP) transport and the retention in saturated pristine and biofilm-conditioned limestone columns. However, the above studies were based on the transport of GONPs in traditional porous media. The geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) is one of the most important barriers preventing the leakage of pollutants in landfills [32,33,34]. Previous studies have shown that the GCL can reduce the ground subsidence caused by garbage leakage, improve the stability of landfills and prolong the service life of landfills [35,36]. One of the main components of the GCL is bentonite particles, and the adsorption of bentonite particles is pretty large, resulting in the fact that the retention mechanism of the GCL is quite different from traditional porous media [37]. However, investigations on the transport of GONPs in the GCL are still ongoing. It is still unclear if GONPs could be transported through the GCL and what the transport behavior of the GONPs in the GCL is like under different conditions.
To investigate the transport and retention rule of GONPs in the GCL, flexible wall permeameters were modified and column tests were carried out. The influence of various factors (temperature, IS and HA) on the transport of GONPs was investigated and analyzed. The transport of GONPs in different media was compared. The experimental results can provide some technical references for the prevention of GONP pollution.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. GONPs

GONPs were derived from Suzhou Heng-qiu Company (Shanghai, China). GONPs are produced through pressurized oxidation method, and the specific manufacture method has been recorded by many investigations. The characteristics of GONPs are summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Geosynthetic Clay Liner

The GCL was prepared through stitching sodium bentonite particles between two layers of geotextiles, as shown in Figure 1. According to the information provided by manufacturer, the bottom layer was woven geotextile with a unit mass of 221 g/cm3, and the top layer was non-woven geotextile with a unit mass of 112 g/cm3.

2.3. Concentration Determination of GONPs

The concentration of GONPs is difficult to determine directly at present. The most widely used method to determine the GONP concentration is the indirect method of ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometry (UV-vis). However, the type and size of GONPs may have an influence on the measuring results. Therefore, calibration tests for UV-vis were carried out, and the results can provide some references for other scholars. Previous investigations have proven that the characteristic adsorption wavelength of GONPs was 230 nm [38]. The relationship between GONP concentration and absorbance was investigated before column tests. GONP suspension (500 mL) was shaken through ultrasonic oscillator for 30 min. Then, suspension was diluted through deionized water. According to the chemical analysis of leachate in landfills, the final concentration range of GONPs was determined from 5 mg/L to 30 mg/L. Suspension was shaken through ultrasonic oscillator for 30 min again, and the absorbance of wave was measured through UV-vis [38]. The experiment was repeated three times, and the average value was taken.

2.4. Experimental Setup

The transport process of GONPs in GCL was investigated using a self-designed apparatus. The apparatus was modified from a flexible wall permeameter [38]. The costumed-designed apparatus consisted of pressure control system, temperature control system (thermostatic water bath and peristaltic pump), penetration vessel and collector, as shown in Figure 2. Constant temperature and pressure should be maintained during the test. To maintain a constant pressure, a pressure gauge was used to monitor the pressure change in real time, and an air pump was used to adjust the pressure state. The temperature can be maintained through the indoor temperature control in previous studies. However, the temperature requirement for column tests in this work was pretty high. Therefore, water circulation was used to keep the constant temperature of the device. Water was heated by heating pump and injected into the flexible hose, which encircles the entire penetration device, as shown in Figure 2. The suspension was transported through GCL under the influence of gravity and specific pressure, which was determined according to the measuring value in LaoGang Landfill in Shanghai, China. The suspension passing through GCL successfully was collected by a collector.

2.5. Column Experiment

To investigate effects of temperature, IS and HA on the transport of GONPs in GCL, a series of column experiments were conducted. The detailed procedures were as follows:
(1)
GCL was placed in the bottom of column. Deionized water (20 PVs) was injected into the column. The value of pore volumes (PVs) was determined by dividing effluent volume by GCL pore volume [33]. The deionized water was transported through the GCL and cleared the mini-impurity in GCL.
(2)
NaCl crystal was dissolved in deionized water, and specific NaCl solution was mixed with GONP suspension to acquire GONP suspension with specific IS [33]. NaCl was chosen to control the IS because Na+ was the most-widespread and common positive ion in leachate. IS could be acquired through NaCl concentration and IS formula. IS value in each experiment is shown in Table 2.
(3)
Specific content of HA was added into the deionized water, and the impurity of HA was removed using 0.45 μm filter membrane. Then, the HA solution was added into the GONP suspension to obtain the suspension with different HA content (Table 2).
(4)
The GONP suspension with different IS and HA was injected into the column. The temperature was controlled by a temperature control system. To highlight the effect of single factor, the experimental scheme was designed based on simple variable method, as shown in Table 2.
(5)
The initial concentration was 50 mg/L, and the pressure was 0.1 MPa in each column experiment. The values for temperature, IS and HA were determined based on previous studies, measured data and hydrogeological reports in many landfills [33].
(6)
Effluent samples (1/3 PV each sample) were collected through automated collector until the volume of effluent exceeded 10 PV. The GONPs remaining in the GCL were washed by 6 PV deionized water.
(7)
The concentration of GONPs in the effluents was measured through UV-vis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Results of GONP Concentration Determination

Figure 3 shows that the absorbance (230 nm) increased with an increase in GONP concentration. The relationship between the absorbance of wavelength (230 nm) and the concentration of GONPs could be fitted through a linear equation, and the correlation coefficient was more than 0.99. This demonstrates that there was a good linear correlation between the GONP concentration and absorbance. Therefore, it is feasible to measure the concentration of GONPs through UV-vis in a specific concentration range.

3.2. Transport of GONPs in GCL

We marked the concentration of GONPs before infiltrating the GCL as C0, and we marked that in effluents as C. The breakthrough curve (BTC) could be plotted through adopting PV as the abscissa and C/C0 as the ordinate [38]. The BTCs of the GONP transport in the GCL under different conditions are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4 shows that GONPs could be transported through the GCL, but the mobility was different under different conditions. As shown in Figure 4a, the maximum value of C/C0 (Cmax) decreased from 0.49 to 0.25 when the temperature increased from 30 °C to 70 °C, indicating that a higher temperature hindered the transport of GONPs in the GCL. Previous studies have also reported a similar trend in the transport of GONPs in quartz sand [26]. This was because a higher temperature aggravated the Brownian movement of GONPs. The Brownian movement increased the aggregation of GONPs and reduced the stability of GONPs in suspension. Additionally, greater Brownian movement increased the collision probability between the GONPs and bentonite particles in the GCL [39]. As a result, a great number of GONPs were deposited on the surface of the bentonite particles, reducing the transport of GONPs.
It is also worth noting that the microbial decomposition in landfills will produce a lot of heat and promote an increase in temperature in landfills. Landfills should be kept at a higher temperature from the view of solely preventing leakage. However, a higher temperature will affect the microbial decomposition. Therefore, the inner temperature of landfills should be controlled at an appropriate value based on specific requirements.
The influence of IS on the BTC is shown in Figure 4b. The Cmax was 0.5, 0.42, 0.37, 0.29 and 0.2 when the IS was 10 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM and 50 mM, respectively. The increasing velocity of C/C0 in the initial period also decreased with an increase in IS, suggesting that a higher IS inhibited the transport of GONPs in the GCL. This result is consistent with previous studies on the transport of GONPs in other porous materials.
The greater IS could inhibit the transport of GONPs for two reasons. Firstly, the electrostatic repulsion between nanoparticles and bentonite particles decreased with an increase in IS, promoting the aggregation and sediment of GONPs. Secondly, the electrostatic repulsion between the positive ion of the suspension and the positive ion of the diffusion layer increased with increasing IS. This resulted in the positive ions of the suspension entering into the adsorption layer, and the shrink of the bentonite double layer. Therefore, the flowing tunnel enlarged and the permeability coefficient of the GCL increased.
Figure 4c reflects the influence of HA on the BTC. The Cmax increased from 0.5 to 0.8 when HA increased from 1 mg/L to 9 mg/L. Additionally, the increasing velocity of C/C0 in the initial period also increased with an increase in HA, suggesting that a more HA tended to be more favorable for the transport of GONPs in the GCL.
This was because HA covered the surface of GONPs and had an effect on the characteristics of the GONP surface. The HA covering the GONPs increased the repulsive force among the GONPs and promoted the suspending stability of GONPs. When the GONPs were transported through the GCL, the covering HA could increase the repulsive force between the nanoparticles and the bentonite particles, promoting the transport of GONPs.

3.3. Retention of GONPs in GCL

The main components of bentonite (kaolinite, montmorillonite and illite) have been proven to have a strong adsorbing effect on GONPs [40]. Additionally, a small part of GONPs was found to deposit on the GCL after each column tests due to the low permeability of the GCL and the aggregation of GONPs (Figure 5). Therefore, the retention of GONPs in the GCL consisted of the adsorption of GONPs and the deposition of GONPs (Figure 5).
The GONPs that deposited on bentonite after each column test were collected and determined through UV-vis. The quantity of GONPs adsorbing on bentonite could be calculated according to the quantity of the total GONPs, GONPs in effluents and deposited GONPs.
The sorption ratio and deposition ratio of GONPs in the GCL under various conditions are shown in Figure 6. Figure 6 shows that the retention ratio of GONPs in the GCL exceeded 40% under different conditions (except Test 13), suggesting the high retention ability of the GCL.
The retention ratio (64.27–78.93%) and sorption ratio (18.44–33.06%) increased when the temperature increased from 30 °C to 70 °C (Figure 6a). This result is consistent with the experimental results of GONP transport in quartz sand and the BTCs in Figure 4. However, the deposition ratios under various temperatures were similar because a higher temperature could enhance the random Brownian movement and the collision frequency, but has little effect on the transport channel of bentonite particles.
When the IS increased from 10 mM to 50 mM, the retention ratio increased from 64.27% to 84.67% and the sorption ratio increased from 18.44% to 31.8% (Figure 6b). This was because the electrostatic repulsion between the GONPs decreased with an increase in IS. Additionally, the deposition ratio also increased from 45.83% to 52.87%, with an increase in IS because the IS could reduce the transport channel.
The retention ratio (64.27–36.4%) and the adsorption ratio (18.44–8.78%) decrease when HA increases from 1 mg/L to 9 mg/L (Figure 6c). A previous study has reported that HA was conducive to the mobility of GONPs because the addition of HA could result in stronger electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance [41].

3.4. Comparison between Transport of GONPs in GCL and in Other Porous Materials

To investigate the difference between the transport of GONPs in the GCL and in other porous materials, the BTCs of GONPs in the GCL (Test 1 and Test 6) were compared with the BTCs in fine glass beads (50–70 μm), coarse glass beads (600–850 μm) and quartz sand (0.425–0.5 mm), as shown in Figure 7. The BTC data in glass beads were provided by the investigation of Chen et al. [42], and the BTC data in quartz sand were provided by the results of Wang et al. [26]. The experiments were conducted under similar pressure, initial concentration and temperature.
Figure 7 shows that the curve shape of the BTC for the GONP transport in the GCL was quite different from the BTCs of the GONPs in other porous materials. The BTCs in quartz sand and glass beads were much steeper, indicating that the increasing rate of C/C0 was much greater. This was because the retention locations on the sand surface were of a limited number and filled up quickly over time due to Languirian dynamics blocking.
In contrast, although the GONPs could also be transported through the GCL, the shape of the BTC in the GCL was much smoother. The Cmax in the GCL was much smaller than the Cmax in glass beads and quartz sand and could be limited within a certain value. For example, the Cmax was 0.71 (fine glass beads), 0.998 (coarse glass beads) and 0.69 (quartz sand), while the Cmax in the GCL (20 mM) was only 0.36. More remarkably, the column test in the GCL was conducted under the condition that the HA of the suspension was 1 mg/L, and the Cmax in the GCL will be smaller if there was no HA in suspension.
The transport velocity of the GONPs in glass beads and quartz sand was also much greater than that in the GCL (Figure 7) due to the strong adsorption of the bentonite particles. These facts proved that the retention ability of the GCL was much better than other porous media.

4. Limitations and Discussion

Some measures were taken to ensure the reliability of the test environment. A water cycle was used to keep the temperature of the penetration tests constant. Constant pressure was maintained through some devices such as pressure gauges and air pumps. However, the simulation tests still face many challenges such as accurately simulating landfill pressure conditions, effectively collecting effluent, maintaining seal integrity to prevent leaks, minimizing pulsation effects from the peristaltic pump, and ensuring the homogeneity of the nanoparticle suspension. Due to the limitation of the experimental conditions, these problems will be investigated in a further study.
The effects of some single factors such as temperature, IS and HA were investigated. However, the actual conditions of landfills are complex and the factors can influence each other. The inconsistency in peak BTCs suggests that the influence rule is more complex than the experimental setup can account for. The setup will be further improved, and the coupling effect of various factors will be studied.

5. Conclusions

The GONPs in landfills have great potential harm to the environment. To investigate the effects of temperature, IS and HA on the leakage of GONPs in the GCL, the experimental setup was modified and a series of column experiments were conducted.
(1)
GONPs could be transported through the GCL, and the transport behaviors under various conditions were different: Cmax decreased (0.49–0.25) with an increase in temperature (30–70 °C) because a higher temperature will aggravate the Brownian movement of GONPs; Cmax decreased (0.49–0.20) with an increase in IS (10–50 MM) because a greater IS could reduce the electrostatic repulsion between nanoparticles and bentonite particles; Cmax increased (0.49–0.8) with an increase in HA (1–9 mg/L) because HA covered the surface of GONPs and affected the characteristics of the GONP surface.
(2)
Higher temperature, greater IS and lower HA will increase the adsorption ratio of GONPs. The deposition ratio increased with an increase in IS, and temperature had little effect on deposition ratio.
(3)
The comparison between the transport of GONPs in the GCL and in other porous materials showed that the BTCs in the GCL were much smoother, and the retention ability of the GCL (0.36 Cmax) was much better than glass beads (0.71 Cmax) and quartz sand (0.69 Cmax).

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.L.; Validation, Y.L.; Investigation, Y.L.; Writing—original draft, Y.L.; Writing—review & editing, T.J.; Supervision, T.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (projects No. 42307198), National Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20221148), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M733747) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XJ2021008101).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

BTCbreakthrough curve
GCLgeosynthetic clay liner
GONPsgraphene oxide nanoparticles
ISionic strength
HAhumic acid

References

  1. Ozcoban, M.S.; Acarer, S. Investigation of the effect of leachate on permeability and heavy metal removal in soils improved with nano additives. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhu, Y.L.; Huang, W.; Liu, Z.L.; Wang, D.B. Application of supramolecular nano-material adsorbent in the treatment of heavy metal pollution in acid selenium-rich soils in south China. Integr. Ferroelectr. 2021, 217, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, X.; Deng, J.R.; Yang, R.; Zhou, D.; Fang, C.Q.; He, X.Y.; Wang, D.; Lei, W.Q.; Hu, J.B.; Li, Y. Facile preparation and characterization of fibrous carbon nanomaterial from waste polyethylene terephthalate. Waste Manag. 2020, 107, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gambardella, C.; Pinsino, A. Nanomaterial Ecotoxicology in the Terrestrial and Aquatic Environment: A Systematic Review. Toxics 2022, 10, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barlaz, M.A.; Mike, M.W.; Ham, R.K. Gas production parameters in sanitary landfill simulations. Waste Manag. Res. 1987, 5, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, I.A.; Berge, N.D.; Sabo-Attwood, T.; Ferguson, P.L.; Saleh, N.B. Single-walled carbon nanotube transport in representative municipal solid waste landfill conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 8425–8433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kamenska, T.; Abrashev, M.; Georgiven, M.; Krasteva, N. Impact of Polyethylene Glycol Functionalization of Graphene Oxide on Anticoagulation and Haemolytic Properties of Human Blood. Materials 2021, 14, 4853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, N.; Ming, J.; Ling, M.; Wu, K.L.; Ye, Y.; Wei, X.W. Solvothermal Synthesis of Bi Nanoparticles/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites and Their Catalytic Applications for Dye Degradation and Fast Aromatic Nitro Compounds Hydrogenation. Chem. Lett. 2020, 49, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, P.; Liu, Y.H.; Yang, K.; Ouyang, Z.B. Effects of pressure on graphene oxide nanoparticle deposition and transport in GCLs. Geosynth. Int. 2020, 27, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cui, J.L.; Qi, M.; Gao, S.B.; Xu, N.; Wang, X.H.; Li, N.; Chen, G.Y. Disposal and resource utilization of waste masks: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 19683–19704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wierzbicki, M.; Jaworski, S.; Sawosz, E.; Jung, A.; Gielerak, G.; Jaremek, H.; Lojkowski, W.; Wozniak, B.; Stobinski, L.; Malolepszy, A.; et al. Graphene Oxide in a Composite with Silver Nanoparticles Reduces the Fibroblast and Endothelial Cell Cytotoxicity of an Antibacterial Nanoplatform. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. An, W.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, K.; Kang, Y.J.; Akhtar, S.; Sha, X.L.; Gao, L. Ocular toxicity of reduced graphene oxide or graphene oxide exposure in mouse eyes. Exp. Eye Res. 2018, 174, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rodriguez-Garcia, S.; Santiago, R.; Lopez-Diaz, D.; Merchan, M.D.; Velazquez, M.M.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Palomar, J. Role of the Structure of Graphene Oxide Sheets on the CO2 Adsorption Properties of Nanocomposites Based on Graphene Oxide and Polyaniline or Fe3O4-Nanoparticles. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 12464–12473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dibyanshu, K.; Chhaya, T.; Raychoudhury, T. A review on the fate and transport behavior of engineered nanoparticles: Possibility of becoming an emerging contaminant in the groundwater. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 20, 4649–4672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, J.D.; Yin, X.B.; Pang, H.; Zhang, L.; Liao, B.; Xin, M.L.; Su, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, L.; Jia, K.L.; et al. Tuning the Wrinkles in 3D Graphene Architectures for Mass and Electron Transport. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 1902190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Seetha, N.; Hassanizadeh, S.M. A two-way coupled model for the co-transport of two different colloids in porous media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2022, 244, 103922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Georgopoulou, M.P.; Syngouna, V.I.; Chrysikopoulos, C.V. Influence of graphene oxide nanoparticles on the transport and cotransport of biocolloids in saturated porous media. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 189, 110841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, M.; Gao, B.; Tang, D.S.; Sun, H.; Yin, X.; Yu, C. Effect of temperature on graphene oxide deposition and transport in saturated porous media. J. Hazard Mater. 2017, 331, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Qi, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, F.; Hou, L.; Chen, W. Factors controlling transport of graphene oxide nanoparticles in saturated sand columns. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wang, D.; Zhang, J.F.; Cao, R.Y.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Li, J.X. The detection and characterization techniques for the interaction between graphene oxide and natural colloids: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 151906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Esfahani, A.R.; Batelaan, O.; Hutson, J.L.; Fallowfield, H.J. Transport and retention of graphene oxide nanoparticles in sandy and carbonaceous aquifer sediments: Effect of physicochemical factors and natural biofilm. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 278, 111419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dong, L.L.; Shi, C.; Guo, L.L.; Yang, T.; Sun, Y.X.; Cui, X.J. Fabrication of redox and pH dual-responsive magnetic graphene oxide microcapsules via sonochemical method. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2017, 36, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xia, T.J.; Lin, Y.X.; Guo, X.T.; Li, S.L.; Cui, J.S.; Ping, H.X.; Zhang, J.; Zhong, R.W.; Du, L.S.; Han, C.X.; et al. Co-transport of graphene oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in saturated quartz sand: Influences of solution pH and metal ions. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 251, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cao, J.J.; Bai, X.; Ye, Z.F.; Chen, W.; Ge, H.Y.; Ding, Y.Y.; Hua, Z.L. Enhanced Transport of TiO2-Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites in Saturated Porous Media: The Impact of Loaded TiO2 Shape and Solution Conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, M.J.; Zhang, H.J.; Chen, W.F.; Lu, T.T.; Yang, H.Y.; Wang, X.H.; Lu, M.H.; Qi, Z.C.; Li, D.L. Graphene oxide nanoparticles and hematite colloids behave oppositely in their co-transport in saturated porous media. Chemosphere 2021, 265, 129081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, M.; Gao, B.; Tang, D.; Yu, C. Concurrent aggregation and transport of graphene oxide in saturated porous media: Roles of temperature, cation type, and electrolyte concentration. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 235, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bai, B.; Nie, Q.K.; Wu, H.Y.; Hou, J.P. The attachment-detachment mechanism of ionic/nanoscale/microscale substances on quartz sand in water. Powder Technol. 2021, 394, 1158–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chrysikopoulos, C.V.; Sotirelis, N.P.; Kallithrakas-kontos, N.G. Cotransport of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles and Kaolinite Colloids in Porous Media. Transp. Porous Media 2017, 119, 181–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tan, S.; Zhou, B.; Wang, Q. Effects of nanocarbon on the hydraulic parameters and the solute transport process for disturbed loessial soil. Arab. J. Geosci. 2016, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, J.Y.; Lu, T.T.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.Q.; Fu, X.W.; Qi, Z.C.; Zhang, Q. Transport of graphene oxide nanoparticles in saturated kaolinite- and goethite-coated sand columns: Effects of low-molecular-weight organic acids. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 24922–24932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Esfahani, A.R.; Batelaan, O.; Hutson, J.L.; Fallowfield, H.J. Effect of bacteria and virus on transport and retention of graphene oxide nanoparticles in natural limestone sediments. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 125929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brachman, R.W.I.; Rowe, R.K.; Take, W.A. Reductions in GCL Overlap Beneath an Exposed Geomembrane. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 2018, 144, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, P.; Jiang, T.; Zhang, Y.L.; Li, Z.C. Effect of Osmotic Pressure on Migration Behavior of nZnO in GCL. Adv. Civ. Engineering 2018, 2018, 6703485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ozcoban, M.S.; Acarer, S.; Tufekci, N. Effect of solid waste landfill leachate contaminants on hydraulic conductivity of landfill liners. Water Sci. Technol. 2022, 85, 1581–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, J.; Huang, C.H.; Zhang, J.W.; Zhang, Z.G. Review of the Anti-Pollution Performance of Triple-Layer GM/GCL/AL Composite Liners. Membranes 2022, 12, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zeng, Z.M.; Lu, Y.; Wan, T.; Lin, S.; Nong, X.Z.; Sun, J.J. Modeling the Salinity Effect on the Water Retention Curve of Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) on the Drying Path. Materials 2023, 16, 5468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shu, S.; Peng, C.J.; Liu, H.; Meng, L.F. Breakthrough times for barrier systems at typical municipal solid waste landfills in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 58773–58782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Fan, W.; Jiang, X.H.; Yang, W.; Geng, Z.; Huo, M.X.; Liu, Z.M.; Zhou, H. Transport of graphene oxide in saturated porous media: Effect of cation composition in mixed Na–Ca electrolyte systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 511, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, C.; Sun, B.; Zhong, Y.; Jiang, J. Numerical Simulation of the Intensified Heat Exchange of CUO-H2O Nano-fluid. J. Eng. Therm. Energy Power 2015, 30, 200–204. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lu, T.T.; Xia, T.J.; Zhang, C.D.; Chen, W. Effects of clay minerals on transport of graphene oxide in saturated porous media. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2017, 36, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jones, E.H.; Su, C. Transport and retention of zinc oxide nanoparticles in porous media: Effects of natural organic matter versus natural organic ligands at circumneutral PH. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 275, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, C.; Shang, J.Y.; Zheng, X.; Zhao, K.; Yan, C.R.; Sharma, P.; Liu, K. Effect of physicochemical factors on transport and retention of graphene oxide in saturated media. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 236, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 17 02082 g001
Figure 1. Structure of the GCL.
Figure 1. Structure of the GCL.
Materials 17 02082 g001
Materials 17 02082 g002
Figure 2. Experimental set-up: (a) schematic diagram and (b) modified flexible wall permeameter.
Figure 2. Experimental set-up: (a) schematic diagram and (b) modified flexible wall permeameter.
Materials 17 02082 g002
Materials 17 02082 g003
Figure 3. Relation between GONP concentration and absorbance.
Figure 3. Relation between GONP concentration and absorbance.
Materials 17 02082 g003
Materials 17 02082 g004
Figure 4. BTCs of GONPs under different conditions in GCL: (a) with different temperature, (b) with different IS and (c) with different HA.
Figure 4. BTCs of GONPs under different conditions in GCL: (a) with different temperature, (b) with different IS and (c) with different HA.
Materials 17 02082 g004
Materials 17 02082 g005
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the deposition and sorption of GONPs.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the deposition and sorption of GONPs.
Materials 17 02082 g005
Materials 17 02082 g006
Figure 6. Retention percent under different conditions: (a) 30–70 °C, (b) 10–50 mM and (c) 1–9 mg/L.
Figure 6. Retention percent under different conditions: (a) 30–70 °C, (b) 10–50 mM and (c) 1–9 mg/L.
Materials 17 02082 g006
Materials 17 02082 g007
Figure 7. BTCs of GONPs in different porous materials [26,42].
Figure 7. BTCs of GONPs in different porous materials [26,42].
Materials 17 02082 g007
Table 1. Characteristics of GONPs.
Table 1. Characteristics of GONPs.
Specific Surface Area (cm2/g)Rate of Single Layer (%)Thickness of Single Layer (nm)Solubility (%)
121798%1.0 nm25%
Table 2. Experimental scheme of column tests.
Table 2. Experimental scheme of column tests.
Test NumberTemperature
(°C)		IS (mmol/L)OC (mg/L)
Temperature group1 (reference test)30101
240101
350101
460101
570101
IS group130101
630201
730301
830401
930501
OC group130101
1030103
1130105
1230107
1330109
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Jiang, T. Effects of Temperature, Ionic Strength and Humic Acid on the Transport of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles in Geosynthetic Clay Liner. Materials 2024, 17, 2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092082

AMA Style

Liu Y, Jiang T. Effects of Temperature, Ionic Strength and Humic Acid on the Transport of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles in Geosynthetic Clay Liner. Materials. 2024; 17(9):2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yaohui, and Tao Jiang. 2024. "Effects of Temperature, Ionic Strength and Humic Acid on the Transport of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles in Geosynthetic Clay Liner" Materials 17, no. 9: 2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092082

APA Style

Liu, Y., & Jiang, T. (2024). Effects of Temperature, Ionic Strength and Humic Acid on the Transport of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles in Geosynthetic Clay Liner. Materials, 17(9), 2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop