Dimensional Stability of Additively Manufactured Dentate Maxillary Diagnostic Casts in Biobased Model Resin
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Specimen Preparation
2.2. Deviation Analysis
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Morón-Conejo, B.; López-Vilagran, J.; Cáceres, D.; Berrendero, S.; Pradíes, G. Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2023, 27, 2521–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joda, T.; Matthisson, L.; Zitzmann, N.U. Impact of aging on the accuracy of 3d-printed dental models: An in vitro investigation. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Young Kim, R.J.; Cho, S.M.; Jung, W.S.; Park, J.M. Trueness and surface characteristics of 3-dimensional printed casts made with different technologies. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Etemad-Shahidi, Y.; Qallandar, O.B.; Evenden, J.; Alifui-Segbaya, F.; Ahmed, K.E. Accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed full-arch dental models: A systematic review. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yilmaz, B.; Donmez, M.B.; Kahveci, Ç.; Cuellar, A.R.; de Paula, M.S.; Schimmel, M.; Abou-Ayash, S.; Çakmak, G. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2022, 128, e1311–e1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brown, G.B.; Currier, G.F.; Kadioglu, O.; Kierl, J.P. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2018, 154, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, S.J.; Kim, D.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, W.C. Accuracy of dental replica models using photopolymer materials in additive manufacturing: In vitro three-dimensional evaluation. J. Prosthodont. 2019, 28, e557–e562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Z.C.; Li, P.L.; Chu, F.T.; Shen, G. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2019, 80, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yousef, H.; Harris, B.T.; Elathamna, E.N.; Morton, D.; Lin, W.S. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2022, 128, 1041–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohner, L.; Hanisch, M.; De Luca Canto, G.; Mukai, E.; Sesma, N.; Neto, P.T. Accuracy of casts fabricated by digital and conventional implant impressions. J. Oral. Implantol. 2019, 45, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dönmez, M.B.; Wepfer, A.B.; Güven, M.E.; Çakmak, G.; Schimmel, M.; Yilmaz, B. Dimensional stability of additively manufactured diagnostic maxillary casts fabricated with different model resins. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2024, 37, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsolakis, I.A.; Papaioannou, W.; Papadopoulou, E.; Dalampira, M.; Tsolakis, A.I. Comparison in terms of accuracy between DLP and LCD printing technology for dental model printing. Dent. J. 2022, 10, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aly, P.; Mohsen, C. Comparison of the accuracy of three-dimensional printed casts, digital, and conventional casts: An in vitro study. Eur. J. Dent. 2020, 14, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Camardella, L.T.; de Vasconcellos Vilella, O.; Breuning, H. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2017, 151, 1178–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rungrojwittayakul, O.; Kan, J.Y.; Shiozaki, K.; Swamidass, R.S.; Goodacre, B.J.; Goodacre, C.J.; Lozada, J.L. Accuracy of 3D printed models created by two technologies of printers with different designs of model base. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grassia, V.; Ronsivalle, V.; Isola, G.; Nucci, L.; Leonardi, R.; Lo Giudice, A. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition. BMC Oral. Health 2023, 23, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lo Giudice, A.; Ronsivalle, V.; Rustico, L.; Aboulazm, K.; Isola, G.; Palazzo, G. Evaluation of the accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped with entry-level LCD-based 3D printers: A study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2022, 26, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corbani, K.; Hardan, L.; Skienhe, H.; Özcan, M.; Alharbi, N.; Salameh, Z. Effect of material thickness on the fracture resistance and failure pattern of 3D-printed composite crowns. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 2020, 23, 225–233. [Google Scholar]
- Vendittoli, V.; Polini, W.; Walter, M.S. An overall performance index to quantify dimensional accuracy and mechanical strength of parts manufactured through VAT photopolymerization in biodegradable and non-biodegradable resin. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 2023, 128, 5491–5502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voet, V.S.D.; Guit, J.; Loos, K. Sustainable photopolymers in 3D printing: A review on biobased, biodegradable, and recyclable alternatives. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2021, 42, e2000475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherman, S.L.; Kadioglu, O.; Currier, G.F.; Kierl, J.P.; Li, J. Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2020, 157, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cho, S.H.; Schaefer, O.; Thompson, G.A.; Guentsch, A. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2015, 113, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maneiro Lojo, J.; Alonso Pérez-Barquero, J.; García-Sala Bonmatí, F.; Agustín-Panadero, R.; Yilmaz, B.; Revilla-León, M. Influence of print orientation on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of diagnostic casts manufactured with a daylight polymer printer. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nestler, N.; Wesemann, C.; Spies, B.C.; Beuer, F.; Bumann, A. Dimensional accuracy of extrusion-and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 125, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nulty, A.B. A comparison of full arch trueness and precision of nine intra-oral digital scanners and four lab digital scanners. Dent. J. 2021, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The Dreve Website. Available online: https://dentamidshop.dreve.de/daten/enu_inst_fotodent_biobased_model_de_gb.pdf?expired=1705759616 (accessed on 20 January 2024).
- The Dreve Website. Available online: https://dentamidshop.dreve.de/daten/enu_inst_fotodent_model2_de_gb.pdf?expired=1705759768 (accessed on 20 January 2024).
- Mangano, F.; Lerner, H.; Margiani, B.; Solop, I.; Latuta, N.; Admakin, O. Congruence between meshes and library files of implant scanbodies: An in vitro study comparing five intraoral scanners. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 12836; Dentistry Digitizing Devices for CAD/CAM Systems for Indirect Dental Restorations: Test Methods for Assessing Accuracy. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:12836:ed-2:v1:en (accessed on 20 January 2024).
- Cakmak, G.; Marques, V.R.; Donmez, M.B.; Lu, W.E.; Abou-Ayash, S.; Yilmaz, B. Comparison of measured deviations in digital implant scans depending on software and operator. J. Dent. 2022, 122, 104154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Material | Chemical Composition |
---|---|
BAM (Biobased dental model resin; FotoDent biobased model) | Acrylic oligomer: ≥50% Fatty acids, C18-unsatd., dimers, polymers with acrylic acid and 1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)- trione: ≥1–<10% |
AM (Dental model resin; FotoDent model 2 beige-opaque) | Bisphenol A, ethoxylated, dimethacrylate: ≥50% 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate: ≥1–<6.3% 7,7,9(7,9,9)-trimethyl-4,13-dioxo-3,14-dioxa-5,12-diazahexadecane-1,16-diylbismethacrylate: 2.5–10% Hydroxypropyl methacrylate: ≥2.5–<10% Aliphatic urethane methacrylate: ≥1–<10% Hydroxylpropyl methacrylate: ≥1–<10% Acrylic resin: ≥1–<3.6% Diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide: ≥1–<3% Propylidynetrimethanol, ethoxylated, esters with acrylic acid: ≥0.1–<1% |
Time Points | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Total | |
BAM | 76.5 ± 1.6 a^ (75.2–77.8) | 77.6 ± 1.5 ab^ (76.4–78.9) | 78.5 ± 1.8 bc^ (77.0–90.0) | 80.0 ± 1.6 cd^ (78.4–81.1) | 80.8 ± 1.7 d^ (79.3–82.2) | 78.6 ± 2.2 B (77.9–79.3) |
AM | 99.3 ± 2.1 a# (97.5–101.0) | 101.4 ± 2.3 b# (99.4–103.3) | 102.4 ± 1.4 b# (101.2–103.6) | 104.4 ± 0.9 c# (103.6–105.1) | 105.8 ±1.0 d# (104.9–106.9) | 102.6 ± 2.8 C (101.7–103.5) |
CV | 50.5 ± 0.9 a* (49.7–51.3) | 52.4 ± 0.7 b* (51.8–53.0) | 54.6 ± 1.6 c* (53.3–56.0) | 56.8 ± 1.3 d* (55.7–57.8) | 58.8 ± 1.7 e* (57.4–60.2) | 54.6 ± 3.3 A (53.6–55.7) |
Total | 75.4 ± 20.4 A (66.8–84.0) | 77.1 ± 20.5 B (68.5–85.8) | 78.5 ± 20.0 C (70.1–86.9) | 80.3 ± 19.9 D (71.9–88.7) | 81.8 ± 19.6 E (73.6–90.1) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Demirel, M.; Diken Türksayar, A.A.; Petersmann, S.; Spintzyk, S.; Donmez, M.B. Dimensional Stability of Additively Manufactured Dentate Maxillary Diagnostic Casts in Biobased Model Resin. Materials 2024, 17, 2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092128
Demirel M, Diken Türksayar AA, Petersmann S, Spintzyk S, Donmez MB. Dimensional Stability of Additively Manufactured Dentate Maxillary Diagnostic Casts in Biobased Model Resin. Materials. 2024; 17(9):2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092128
Chicago/Turabian StyleDemirel, Münir, Almira Ada Diken Türksayar, Sandra Petersmann, Sebastian Spintzyk, and Mustafa Borga Donmez. 2024. "Dimensional Stability of Additively Manufactured Dentate Maxillary Diagnostic Casts in Biobased Model Resin" Materials 17, no. 9: 2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092128