Next Article in Journal
Identification the Pathogens Causing Rot Disease in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) in China and the Antifungal Activity of Aqueous Garlic Extract
Previous Article in Journal
Object-Based Tree Species Classification Using Airborne Hyperspectral Images and LiDAR Data
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/f11010033
Review Report
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Overexpression of a Novel LcKNOX Transcription Factor from Liriodendron chinense Induces Lobed Leaves in Arabidopsis thaliana

Forests 2020, 11(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010033
by Jikai Ma 1, Guoguo Mei 1, Huanhuan Liu 1 and Huogen Li 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Forests 2020, 11(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010033
Submission received: 6 December 2019 / Revised: 18 December 2019 / Accepted: 23 December 2019 / Published: 24 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecophysiology and Biology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thanks for editing your manuscript and responding to my questions and suggestions. I find this paper interesting. It brings new insights to our understanding of leaf shape development and evolution. It seems there are still some minor language edits to be done but in general, I recommend it for publication in Forests. 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We are really grateful for your thorough reading and professional suggestions of this manuscript which really help us improve the quality of this manuscript. We have checked and modified the language in manuscript.

Thanks again.

Sincerely,

Reviewer 2 Report

After reviewing the resubmitted manuscript and the authors' responses to my comments, the following should be noted: (i) the authors satisfactorily responded to all the questions and comments I have raised; (ii) the comments and questions posed by me has been clarified in manuscript.

Line 160 - it is more professional to use the term “the 35S CaMV promoter instead of “the CaMV 35S promoter”, as well as “XbaI and BamHI sites” instead of “Xba- I and Bam-HI”.

I believe these shortcomings will be resolved during the editing of the manuscript.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We truly appreciate for your thorough reading and professional suggestions of this manuscript which really help us improve the quality of this manuscript.

The inaccurate words have been revised. Also, we checked and revised the language in manuscript.

Thanks again.

Sincerely,

Back to TopTop