Next Article in Journal
Differentiation in Leaf Physiological Traits Related to Shade and Drought Tolerance Underlies Contrasting Adaptations of Two Cyclobalanopsis (Fagaceae) Species at the Seedling Stage
Next Article in Special Issue
Simulation Models of Skidder Conventional and Hybrid Drive
Previous Article in Journal
Growth, Carbon Storage, and Optimal Rotation in Poplar Plantations: A Case Study on Clone and Planting Spacing Effects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimation of Over- and Under-Bark Volume of Scots Pine Timber Produced by Harvesters
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Innovative Design of the Fire-Fighting Adapter for Forest Machinery

Forests 2020, 11(8), 843; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080843
by Richard Hnilica 1,*, Miroslava Ťavodová 1, Michaela Hnilicová 1, Jaroslav Matej 2 and Valéria Messingerová 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Forests 2020, 11(8), 843; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080843
Submission received: 17 July 2020 / Revised: 25 July 2020 / Accepted: 30 July 2020 / Published: 4 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forestry Production Process Automation and Robotization)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article is very interesting and valuable. It shows whole process of desinging of innovative fire-fighting attachment starting from a concept and ending with a product.

I recommend some small changes:

  1. Tab. 1. In a table or in a text. Add the steel title or EN steel number, add a type or a short description of tested fiberglass.
  2. Fig. 4 - Too small axis labels. Description "a" "b" in wrong places.
  3. Fig. 6 - bigger or clearer picture or close up for internal wave-breaks. Show at least one dimension on it.
  4. What about stability and power demand - are there any recommendations for a machine like weight?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

An interesting concept of an innovative adapter for a skidding tractor, the dominant model in the forestry of Central Europe. It allows to extend the possibilities of using the base machine for other tasks. Project work with great application potential; carried out in accordance with the current methods in this area.

Detailed comments:

(1) The manuscript does not contain abstracts and keywords.

(2) The authors analyze only one (IV) concept of the new construction, therefore the remaining possible should be criticized in the chapter discussion.

(3) Material testing methods should be in Chapter 2.

(4) The mechanical properties tests were carried out in accordance with the applicable standards, therefore Figure 3 does not add any new information and should be deleted.

(5) Rows 298-301 should be in Chapter 4.

(6) The authors should explain why they put so much work into material research, leading to a reduction in the weight of the adapter. They got a lot of information added. However, considering the large total weight of the container, was it crucial to reduce the weight of the structure itself?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop