Next Article in Journal
Stand Structural Diversity and Species with Leaf Nitrogen Conservation Drive Aboveground Carbon Storage in Tropical Old-Growth Forests
Next Article in Special Issue
Herb-Layer Dynamics in an Old-Growth Forest: Vegetation–Environment Relationships and Response to Invasion-Related Perturbations
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Genetic Parameters and Selection of Superior Genotypes in a 12-Year-Old Clonal Norway Spruce Field Trial after Phenotypic Assessment Using a UAV
Previous Article in Special Issue
Forest Compositional Changes after a Decade of Emerald Ash Borer
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Investigation of Pinewood Nematodes in Pinus tabuliformis Carr. under Low-Temperature Conditions in Fushun, China

Forests 2020, 11(9), 993; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090993
by Long Pan 1, Rong Cui 1,2, Yongxia Li 1,3,*, Yuqian Feng 1 and Xingyao Zhang 1,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Forests 2020, 11(9), 993; https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090993
Submission received: 4 August 2020 / Revised: 5 September 2020 / Accepted: 9 September 2020 / Published: 16 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impacts of Insect Pests and Diseases on Forest Ecosystems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscripts is satisfactory, however the authors should address the below queries before it is further processed.

Major

  • Provide the Nucleotide sequence alignment of the ITS of your amplified sequennce and compare with previous B. xylophilus sequence.
  • Whats the approximate length of the third stage juvenile. Please use scale bars in Fig.2
  • What are authors trying to say in Fig. B , C, D? What’s the point in showing them separately.
  • Fig. 4. What are the estimates of nematode eggs? It should also be estimated I believe.
  • Give proper citations for the ITS primers used.  I would have preferred doing an a RPA assay.

Minor

  • Line 24. Monochamus which species was tested.
  • I believe pinewood is a single term. It should be  pinewood and not Pine Wood.
  • Fig.1. the captions should be healthy and not health. IN legends mention the statistics.
  • Fig. 4. It would be scientific if the significance levels are provided.

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper deals with interesting topic of B. xylophilus nematode adaptation into cooler conditions.

According to my opinion the manuscript should be improved.

Add basic aims of your work at the end of Introduction part. It must be clearly stated what was the main purpose of the paper and what main scientific result was expected.

Line 95: Sentence beginning with "Look for..." does not make sense, please adjust it.

Line 108: Baermann funnel

Paragraph 2.3: There is no information considering DNA sequencing in this paragraph, add at least one sentence with short description how was it done (PCR product sequencing, cloning in bacterial vector?).

Paragraph 2.5: Last sentence of the paragraph is rather banal, please omit it.

Table 1: what are the values presented in the table? Averages +/- SD or averages +/- SE? Please add the explanation into table description. On the other hand there is no need to explain deManns indexes (a, b etc) in the table description, they should be well known to nematologists. 

Line 187: cancer of trees - please delete this, Pine Wilt Disease is better and much more widespread term. 

The manuscript also contains a number of spacing faluts, it should be corrected prior the publication.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors have defended well. it can be accepted now.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop