Next Article in Journal
Impact of Gene Flow and Introgression on the Range Wide Genetic Structure of Quercus robur (L.) in Europe
Previous Article in Journal
Plywood Made from Plasma-Treated Veneers: Investigation of Performance Differences between Plasma-Pretreated and Untreated Beech Veneers at Comparable Melamine Resin Load
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ethnobotanical Survey in Tampolo Forest (Fenoarivo Atsinanana, Northeastern Madagascar)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenology of Oenocarpus mapora H. Karst in Low-Terrace and High-Terrace Forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru

1
Instituto de Ciencias de los Alimentos y Nutrición (ICAN-USIL), Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru
2
Asociación para la Conservación de la Cuenca Amazónica (ACCA), Madre de Dios 17001, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2021, 12(10), 1424; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101424
Submission received: 1 July 2021 / Revised: 29 September 2021 / Accepted: 14 October 2021 / Published: 19 October 2021

Abstract

:
Oenacarpus mapora H. Karst (O. mapora) is an Amazon palm with high economic and nutraceutical potential, from which the pulp and oil can be extracted. The objective of this study was to evaluate the phenology of O. mapora in low-terrace and high-terrace forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru. Two hundred sixteen individuals of O. mapora were monitored between June 2019 and January 2020, evaluating the presence of flower buds, open flowers, immature fruits and ripe fruits. Weighted mean analyses of the phenological pattern and correlation between climatic and phenological variables were carried out. Higher productivity mediated by a greater number of mature green leaves and bunches was observed in terrace forests located at a lower altitude. In both forest subtypes, flower buds and open flowers were continuous with a peak in July and August, respectively, during the dry season. In both habitats, unripe fruits were also continuous with a peak in September, while ripe fruits showed a peak in December and January in low-terrace and high-terrace forests, respectively, during the rainy season. Our findings show that flowering was continuous during the evaluated period, while fruiting increased during the rainy season associated with a greater number of days with precipitation.

1. Introduction

Phenological events in Neotropical plants are regulated by abiotic and biotic factors. Climate and soil are the most important abiotic factors that regulate plant phenology [1,2]. In tropical forests with well-defined dry and rainy seasons, the phenological patterns are highly seasonal, with precipitation and soil moisture being the main factors that induce reproductive activities [3]. In general, flowering is triggered by rains. In many tree species, more intense rains induce a greater synchronization of flowering [4]. Furthermore, in some species, fruit production increases during the rainy season [5,6].
Palm trees are abundant in the tropics and are found in almost all possible habitats, but their diversity is greatest in rainy lowland rainforests [7]. The phenological behavior of palm populations and communities is still scarce for the forests of the South American Amazon. The flowering of palm trees takes place mainly in the dry season and fruiting throughout the year but is greater in the rainy season. These phenological variations are influenced by various factors, such as the degree of seasonality, which is correlated with flowering [8].
In the Amazon, there is very little information on the flowering and fruiting processes in palm trees. Approximately, the Amazon basin is home to 151 species of palm trees [7], of which 149 species of palm trees have been reported in the Peruvian Amazon [9].
The Madre de Dios Region located to the Eastern part of Peru has an area of 85,182.63 km2, which represents 6.6% of the Peruvian territory and 15.3% of the Peruvian Amazon. [10]. In this region, which presents a high biological diversity in flora and fauna [11], 42 species and 18 genera of palm trees have been identified, mainly in four forest habitats: terra firme, flood plain, terrace and premontane hills. These forests present densities ranged from 1709 to 3245 (on average 2755) palms/hectare [12].
In general, terrace forests present a lower species richness and abundance of palm trees compared to other forests in the Madre de Dios Region, Peru [12]. Within the palm trees of the Peruvian Amazon that inhabit terrace forests, O. mapora has received less attention. However, this palm tree has a high economic potential due to the different uses attributed to it, which is why it is highly valued by the Ashaninka population of Peru [13]. The roots and pods are attributed a medicinal and cosmetic use, the logs are used in the construction of rustic houses, the leaves for the construction of baskets and house roofs, while the fruits have a high nutraceutical potential, from which the pulp and oil can be extracted. Ripe fruits are used to make beverages that can be consumed locally or exploited commercially [14]. In tropical forests, palms can contribute more than 80% of the total biomass of the fruit fall, which constitute a “key resource” for the survival of frugivorous vertebrates and the maintenance of Neotropical rainforests [15]. In the case of O. mapora fruits, these have a high potential for industrial exploitation due to their high content of phenolic compounds and polyunsaturated fatty acids.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the phenological behavior of O. mapora in the Peruvian Amazon. This study evaluated the hypothesis that meteorological conditions or habitat influence the phenological pattern of O. mapora, with higher productivity associated with lower altitudes. The objective of this research was to compare the phenological behavior and productivity of O. mapora in two types of habitats (low-terrace and high-terrace forests) from the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Species Studied

O. mapora is a monocaule or multicaule Amazonian palm, belonging to the Arecaceae family, which has up to 10 stems, a height and diameter between 5–15 m and 4–17 cm, respectively. It can be found in primary or moderately intervened humid forests, which can be on the mainland or flooded areas. It is distributed from Central America to Northern South America, including the Amazon basin, from sea level to 1000 m of altitude [16,17]. In Peru, it is distributed along the lower Ucayali, often in swamps where Mauritia flexuosa L.f. inhabits. In this region, the density of O. mapora can reach 351 trees per hectare. In the Peruvian Amazon, O. mapora is called “sinami”, “sinamillo”, “ciame” or “ungurahuillo”. Generally, its fruits appear at the end of the rainy season and at the beginning of summer, when they are ripe, they are dark purple in color and can be used for making beverages [18].

2.2. Study Area

The study was carried out between June 2019 and January 2020 (in eight field trips) at the “Los Amigos” Biological Station, granted to the “Asociación para la Conservación de la Cuenca Amazónica (ACCA)”, located in the “Los Amigos” river basin in the lower Amazon rainforest of the Madre de Dios Region (12°34′06.9″–12°50′10.12″ S, 70°05′56.5″–70°40′26″ W), ranging from 200–300 m asl [19]. This area has an extension of 145,918 ha and a total perimeter of 450 km. The climate of this region is hot, humid and seasonal [20]. The dry season occurs from May to October and the rainy season from November to April [21]. The annual average temperature is 24.2 °C, with a maximum and minimum temperature of 37.9 °C and 11.3 °C, respectively. Average annual precipitation is 2648 mm, average relative humidity and minimum relative humidity are 87.6% and 29.2%, respectively [19]. According to the classification of Life Zones by Holdrige [22], the Madre de Dios Region of Peru belongs to the Transitional to Subtropical Tropical Humid Forest Life Zone (bh-T/S). In this region, the terrace forest and floodplain forest predominate. Furthermore, it presents in its surroundings bamboo patches, primary succession forest, riparian vegetation and areas altered by artisanal gold mining [19]. The present study was carried out in two types of habitats: low-terrace and high-terrace forests (Figure 1). Terraced forests are found along rivers, adjacent to and similar to floodplains, but located outside the flood zone. The terraces are flat and originated as floodplains but have risen higher due to tectonic movements [12]. Terrace forests can be subdivided into low-terrace forest located on terraces formed during the Pleistocene and high-terrace forest located on the Pebas and Ipururo formations developed in the late Tertiary [23].

2.3. Selection of Individuals

For the identification of O. mapora individuals, the variable transect method proposed by Foster et al. [24] was used, which allows to quickly perform vegetation evaluations. In the present study, approximately eight palm trees were evaluated for each transect. The phenological monitoring was carried out in low-terrace and high-terrace forests, in nine existing trails of the “Los Amigos” Biological Station of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru (Table 1).
The individuals of O. mapora were selected according to Ureta et al. [21], considering: (a) individuals capable of producing flowers and fruits, (b) individuals with flowers and fruits, and (c) individuals with a crown free of infestations (lianas, epiphytes and stranglers). Likewise, for each one of the individuals of O. mapora, the height, number of mature green leaves and bunches per individual were recorded (Table 2).

2.4. Reproductive Phenology, Rainfall and Temperature

Two hundred sixteen individuals of O. mapora (84 and 132 in low-terrace and high-terrace forests, respectively) were directly monitored monthly with binoculars [25] by two people for a period of eight months from June 2019 to January 2020. For each individual, the total number of the following phenophases was recorded monthly: (1) Unopened inflorescences (flower buds), (2) Open inflorescences (open flowers), (3) Green inflorescences (unripe fruits) and (4) Ripe inflorescences (ripe fruits) (Figure 2).
The rainfall and temperature data were obtained from the meteorological station “Monitoring Center 1” located in the low-terrace forest in the “Los Amigos” Conservation Concession, Madre de Dios Region, Peru. In the study area, there is another meteorological station located at a distance of 3.5 km from “Monitoring Center 1”; however, it did not record complete data for this period.
As shown in Figure 3, during the study period, a rainfall between 85–551 mm (212 mm on average) was observed. Rainfall had a unimodal behavior, with a maximum peak in December with 551.20 mm. The number of days with precipitation varied between 4 and 31 days (17 days on average). The climate was warm with an average temperature ranged between 25.69 to 29.52 °C (27.87 °C on average), while the maximum and minimum temperatures varied between 33.47 to 38.10 °C and 17.39 to 23.00 °C, respectively.

2.5. Biometric Characteristics of the Fruits

Each bunch of O. mapora produced between 500 and 700 fruits. From five individuals of O. mapora from low-terrace and high-terrace forests, 223 fruits from different positions along the rachis were selected to evaluate their biometric characteristics. For each of the fruits, the length, width and weight of the fruit were recorded.

2.6. Data Analysis

The mean date for all phenological variables was calculated using the weighted average date of occurrence, which is the arithmetic mean of all the dates on which the occurrence was observed, weighted by its abundance on each date [26,27]. This analysis was carried out with the R software version 4.0.4. Differences in the intensity of the different phenological variables between low-terrace and high-terrace forests were evaluated using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Furthermore, to evaluate the association between the climatic and phenological variables, the monthly mean of each climatic variables was correlated with the monthly average per individual of each phenological variable using the Spearman method. These results were considered significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01.

3. Results

3.1. Plant Height and Mature Green Leaves

As shown in Figure 4 and Table 3, the different phenological variables evaluated showed variation in their intensity in low-terrace and high-terrace forests. In the high-terrace forest, the palm trees presented a significantly higher average height compared to the low-terrace forest (p < 0.05). In both forest subtypes, no significant differences were found in the height of O. mapora depending on the season.
In low-terrace and high-terrace forests, the number of mature green leaves and bunches per individual presented a mean date in August, in the middle of the dry season (May to October). In both habitats, the number of mature green leaves was stable throughout the evaluated period, with a significantly higher number of mature green leaves in the low-terrace forest compared to the high-terrace forest (p < 0.05). Likewise, throughout the study, the average number of bunches per individual was higher in the low-terrace forest compared to the high-terrace forest (p < 0.05).
As shown in Table 4, in the low-terrace forest, the climatic variables (minimum temperature, rainfall and numbers of days with precipitation) showed a positive correlation with the height of the palm tree (p < 0.05). On the other hand, in the high-terrace forest, minimum temperature, rainfall and numbers of days with precipitation showed a negative correlation with average height of the palm tree (p < 0.05).

3.2. Flowering and Fructification

During the study period, no large temperature fluctuations were observed. Between June to August, a lower average temperature was observed (25.69 to 25.98 °C), while between July to January an increase in the average temperature was observed (28.65 to 29.52 °C). Likewise, during the rainy season, from November to January, a significant increase in rainfall was observed, ranging from 291 to 551.20 mm.
Regarding flowering phenology, flower buds were continuous in low-terrace and high-terrace forests, with a mean date in July, peaking in June; while open flowers were also continuous in low-terrace and high-terrace forests, with a mean date and peaking in August, at the end of the dry season (May to October). When comparing the flowering pattern between both forest subtypes, the number of open flowers was significantly higher in the high-terrace forest compared to the low-terrace forest (59.76 ± 10.09% and 44.85 ± 7.36%, respectively, p < 0.05).
Likewise, in the low-terrace forest, average and maximum temperature showed a negative correlation with flower buds (p < 0.05), while numbers of days with precipitation showed a negative correlation with open flowers (p < 0.05).
Fruiting phenology showed a continuous pattern for unripe fruits in low-terrace and high-terrace forests, with a mean date and peaking in September, at the end of the dry season. Ripe fruits were also continuous in the low-terrace forest, with a with a mean date in August, peaking in December; while in the high-terrace forest, ripe fruits peaked in January with a mean date in July. In both forest subtypes, a higher occurrence of ripe fruits was observed in the middle of the rainy season (November to April). The ripe fruits had a length, width and weight of 18.9 ± 1.0 mm, 17.8 ± 0.9 mm and 3.9 ± 0.5 g, respectively.
No statistically significant differences were observed in the flowering pattern and unripe fruits between low-terrace and high-terrace forests. Throughout the study, the presence de ripe fruits were higher in the low-terrace forest compared to the high-terrace forest, although statistically significant differences were not observed.
Furthermore, in the high-terrace forest, the maximum temperature was positively correlated with unripe fruits (p < 0.05), while the number of days with precipitation showed a negative and positive correlation with open flowers and ripe fruits, respectively (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1. Plant Height and Mature Green Leaves

In plants, the height of an individual is correlated with its reproductive ability because larger individuals have a greater potential for obtaining the resources necessary for their reproduction [28]. In some palm species such as Butia, Geonoma, and Chamaedorea, height is associated with higher fruit or leaf productivity [29,30,31]. Particularly in B. capitata, the number of mature green leaves associated with its aerial foliar biomass and photosynthetic potential, represents a good indicator of its productivity. A higher productivity was found in a younger population composed of shorter individuals compared to older and taller individuals. An increase in height followed by the senescence of the palm tree would explain the decrease in the production of leaves and fruits [31]. Likewise, growth rates of a plant may decline with altitude because the intensity of competition for light decreases at a higher altitude [32]. According to these findings, in the present study, in the low-terrace forest compared to the high-terrace forest, O. mapora individuals presented a lower height. However, these individuals showed higher productivity represented by an increased number of mature green leaves and bunches, which would indicate that similar to B. capitata [31], productivity in O. mapora could be associated with the number of mature green leaves.

4.2. Flowering and Fructification

In many tropical species, the phenological behavior varies between geographic regions, and may be related to habitat and climatic conditions [33]. There are few studies on the reproductive phenology of palms of the genus Oenocarpus in South America. Some studies carried out in other Oenocarpus species, such as O. bataua, have reported a lack of synchrony between the individuals of a population in regions where there is no greater variation in climatic factors or it responds to endogenous factors [34,35].
A study in which the reproductive phenology of O. bataua was evaluated for four years in the forests of the Colombian Andes reported different peaks of flowering and fruiting during the evaluated period, observing a lack of synchrony between and within individuals. Likewise, due to the climatic conditions in which there was no greater fluctuation in temperature and rainfall during the evaluated period, no effect was observed on the onset or frequency of phenological events [34]. Furthermore, in a study carried out on the phenology of O. bataua in two forest types: occasionally and periodically flooded, in the Chocó Biogeographic Region of Colombia, a synchrony was not observed in the occurrence of the different phenological phases evaluated: flower bud, unfertilized inflorescence, fertilized inflorescence, infrutescence with immature fruits, infrutescence with ripe fruits and dry bunches. Similarly, there was no significant association between precipitation and the occurrence of phenophases, so its phenological cycle seems to respond to endogenous factors and/or to ecological-evolutionary relationships [35].
Another study carried out in eight species of palm trees (Euterpe precatoria, Oenocarpus bataua, Iriartea deltoidea, Mauritia flexuosa, Bactris gasipaes, Astrocaryum murumuru, Socratea exorrhiza and Attalea phalerata) in the Amazon rainforest of Bolivia, found that the phenology was variable according to the climate seasonal of the Amazonian forest of Hondo River, observing a decrease in the occurrence of flowers and fruits during the dry season. In the case of O. batatua, long asynchronous flowering and short synchronous fruiting were observed. The presence of flowers occurred throughout the rainy season (December to February), while the presence of immature fruits was observed throughout the year. The presence of ripe fruits was recorded mainly in the dry season (June to August) and lasted until the transition from the dry to rainy season (March to May) [36].
Some studies show that flowering begins at the end of the dry season, probably because palm tree seeds have the ability to germinate quickly when water and nutrients are available in the rainy season [37]. Likewise, the availability of fruits is related to a period of greater intensity of rains [38].
In the present study, during February to May 2020, complete data on the phenology of O. mapora could not be recorded. However, a previous study carried out between July 2005 and May 2008 in two localities of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru, such as Tampobata and “Los Amigos”, in which the dry and rainy seasons occur in the same periods as our investigation, reported in general that seven arborescent palms (Mauritia flexuosa, Socratea exorrhiza, Euterpe precatoria, Oenocarpus bataua, Iriartea deltoidea, Astrocaryum murumuru and Attalea butyracea) that inhabit these areas, flowering occurred during the rainy season while fruiting occurred during the transition from dry to rainy season. Particularly in “Los Amigos”, located on the banks of the Madre de Dios and Los Amigos rivers, some palm trees such as A. butyracea showed an annual flowering and fruiting pattern. Other palms of the genus Oenocarpus, such as O. bataua, presented a sub-annual to continuous flowering pattern with maximum productivity peaks of 40% in the rainy season, while fruiting showed a continuous pattern, with peaks that varied between 60% and 80% throughout the rainy season [21]. There is no evidence on the phenological behavior of O. mapora in Amazonian rainforests.
During the present study, the lower Amazon rainforest of the Madre de Dios Region of Peru presented a warm climate, however, during the winter months between June to August, the lowest minimum temperature was recorded (on average 17.90 °C), which favored the formation of flower buds during these months. According to this finding, in the low-terrace forest a negative correlation was observed between flower buds with the maximum temperature and average temperature. Previous studies show that flowering is stimulated at low temperatures close to 17 °C but is reduced when the temperature is increased to 24 °C [39,40].
Furthermore, an increase of approximately 4 °C in the average temperature was observed during the spring months between September to December. During this period, in both low-terrace and high-terrace forests, this increase in average temperature is consistent with an increase in the presence of open flowers in August. A previous study shows that an increase in temperature from 20 °C to 30–35 °C, in the presence of light, is required for a rapid flower opening, observing a full opening in the presence of light and high temperatures [41]. According to these findings, a lower intensity in the abundance of open flowers was observed in the low-terrace forest, where the climatic conditions for the present study were recorded. However, altitude has an effect on phenological behavior through air temperature, causing a decrease in temperature of approximately 0.6 °C per 100 m [42], which would produce a lower minimum temperature in the high-terrace forest, driving a greater abundance of open flowers.
Comparing the two subtypes of forests evaluated in the present study, no differences were observed in the fruiting pattern, with the exception of the occurrence of ripe fruits, whose peak in low-terrace and high-terrace forests was at the beginning and middle of the rainy season, respectively.
During the evaluated period, an increase in rainfall was observed from November to January. Interestingly, an increase in the number of ripe fruits was associated with a greater intensity of rainfall and number of days with precipitation. However, in the high-terrace forest, the occurrence of ripe fruits significantly correlated with the number of days of precipitation, observing a trend in the association with rainfall. Probably, a greater availability of water in the soil mediated by a greater number of days of precipitation would be important in palm trees that grow in flooded soils such as O. mapora. According to this, the aptitude of this Amazon palm was associated with a greater availability of water observed during the middle of the rainy season [43].
The study of the vegetative and reproductive phenology of O. mapora is of great interest to understand the ecosystem and availability of resources in the Peruvian Amazon. In this sense, this palm has a high economic potential as a nutraceutical and is also part of the diet of several Amazonian herbivores, which favors its distribution and density in the Amazon forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.

5. Conclusions

During our study, climatic conditions in the lower Amazon rainforest of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru, caused the flowering of O. mapora to be observed throughout the evaluated period, while fruiting increased from the middle of the rainy season. Flowering was influenced by temperature and type of habitat, while fruiting was associated with an increase in the number of days with precipitation. Furthermore, depending on the habitat, terrace forests located at higher altitudes had a lower average palm height, as well as a lower number of mature green leaves and bunches per individual, probably due to greater senescence and lower productivity of the palm trees. However, long-term studies are required to evaluate the effects of habitat and inter-annual climatic variation on flowering and fruiting events of this important southeastern Peruvian Amazon palm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, I.B., A.P., L.A., F.R.-E. and A.M.M.; field work, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, H.R., E.V., J.F.L. and P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Fund for Scientific, Technological Development and Technological Innovation (FONDECYT) of the National Council of Science, Technology and Technological Innovation (CONCYTEC) of Peru, Contract 108-2018-FONDECYT-BM-IADT-MU.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Association for the Conservation of the Amazon Basin (ACCA) for their valuable assistance in carrying out the field work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morellato, L.P.C.; Talora, D.C.; Takahasi, A.; Bencke, C.C.; Romera, E.C.; Zipparro, V.B. Phenology of Atlantic Rain Forest Trees: A Comparative Study1. Biotropica 2000, 32, 811–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morellato, L.P.C.; Alberton, B.; Alvarado, S.T.; Borges, B.; Buisson, E.; Camargo, M.G.G.; Cancian, L.F.; Carstensen, D.W.; Escobar, D.F.E.; Leite, P.T.P.; et al. Linking Plant Phenology to Conservation Biology. Biol. Conserv. 2016, 195, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Nadia, T.d.L.; Morellato, L.P.C.; Machado, I.C. Reproductive Phenology of a Northeast Brazilian Mangrove Community: Environmental and Biotic Constraints. Flora 2012, 207, 682–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Morellato, L.P.C.; Camargo, M.G.G.; Gressler, E. A Review of Plant Phenology in South and Central America. In Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science, 2nd ed.; Schwartz, M., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 91–113. ISBN 978-94-007-6924-3. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sun, C.; Kaplin, B.A.; Kristensen, K.A.; Munyaligoga, V.; Mvukiyumwami, J.; Kajondo, K.K.; Moermond, T.C. Tree Phenology in a Tropical Montane Forest in Rwanda. Biotropica 1996, 28, 668–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Villasana, A.R.A.; Suárez, A. Estudio Fenológico de Dieciseis Especies Forestales Presentes en la Reserva Forestal IMATACA, Edo. Bolívar-Venezuela; Universidad de los Andes: Mérida, Venezuela, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Henderson, A.; Salazar, A. The Palms of the Amazon; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1995; ISBN 978-0-19-508311-8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Henderson, A. Bactris (Palmae). Flora Neotrop. 2000, 79, 1–181. [Google Scholar]
  9. Balslev, H.; Macía, M.; Navarrete, H. Cosecha de Palmas en el Noroeste de Suramérica: Bases Científicas Para Su Manejo y Conservación; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador: Ambato, Ecuador, 2015; ISBN 978-9978-77-230-0. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dirección Regional de Salud Madre de Dios. Dirección de Epidemiología. Análisis de Situación de Salud 2016. Available online: http://dge.gob.pe/portal/Asis/indreg/asis_madrededios.pdf (accessed on 16 June 2021).
  11. Phillips, O.; Martinez, R.; Vargas, P.; Monteagudo, A.; Zans, M.E.; Galiano Sánchez, W.; Cruz, A.; Timana, M.; Yli-Halla, M.; Rose, S. Efficient Plot-Based Floristic Assessment of Tropical Forests. J. Trop. Ecol. 2003, 19, 629–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Balslev, H.; Laumark, P.; Pedersen, D.; Grández, C. Tropical Rainforest Palm Communities in Madre de Dios in Amazonian Peru. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2016, 23, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sosnowska, J.; Walanus, A.; Balslev, H. Asháninka Palm Management and Domestication in the Peruvian Amazon. Hum. Ecol. Interdiscip. J. 2015, 43, 451–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Balslev, H.; Grandez, C.; Paniagua Zambrana, N.Y.; Møller, A.L.; Hansen, S.L. Palmas (Arecaceae) Útiles En Los Alrededores de Iquitos, Amazonía Peruana. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2008, 15, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Genini, J.; Galetti, M.; Morellato, L.P.C. Fruiting Phenology of Palms and Trees in an Atlantic Rainforest Land-Bridge Island. Flora-Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2009, 204, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Balick, M.J. Systematics and Economic Botany of the Oenocarpus-Jessenia (Palmae) Complex. Adv. Econ. Bot. 1986, 3, 1–140. [Google Scholar]
  17. Moura, E.F.; de Oliveira, M.S.P. Genetic Diversity in a Germplasm Bank of Oenocarpus Mapora (Arecaceae). Genet. Mol. Res. 2012, 11, 4008–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Smith, N. Oenocarpus mapora. In Palms and People in the Amazon; Smith, N., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 421–428. ISBN 978-3-319-05509-1. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pitman, N.C.A. An Overview of the Los Amigos Watershed, Madre de Dios, Southeastern Peru; (Unpublished Report); Amazon Conservation Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  20. Terborgh, J.; Andresen, E. The Composition of Amazonian Forests: Patterns at Local and Regional Scales. J. Trop. Ecol. 1998, 14, 645–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ureta, A.M.; Martinez, P.; Tupayachi, R.; Zuniga, A. Fenología de palmeras arborescentes nativas de Madre De Dios–Perú. Intropica 2014, 9, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Holdridge, L.; Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agrícolas (IICA); Jiménez Saa, H. Ecología Basada en Zonas de Vida; Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura: San José, Costa Rica, 1978; ISBN 978-92-9039-131-9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dumont, J.F.; Deza, E.; Garcia, F. Morphostructural Provinces and Neotectonics in the Amazonian Lowlands of Peru. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 1991, 4, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Foster, R.B.; Hernandez, N.C.; Kakudidi, E.K.; Burnham, R.J. Rapid Assessment of Tropical Plant Communities Using Variable Transects: An Informal and Practical Guide; Field Museum of Chicago: Chicago, IL, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  25. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Guidelines for Plant Phenological Observations; WCDMP-No. 70; WMO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gillespie, M.A.K.; Baggesen, N.; Cooper, E.J. High Arctic Flowering Phenology and Plant–Pollinator Interactions in Response to Delayed Snow Melt and Simulated Warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 115006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ter Braak, C.J.F. New Robust Weighted Averaging- and Model-Based Methods for Assessing Trait–Environment Relationships. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2019, 10, 1962–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Harper, J.L.; Ltd, H.P. Population Biology of Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1977; ISBN 978-0-12-325850-2. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chazdon, R.L. Patterns of Growth and Reproduction of Geonoma Congesta, a Clustered Understory Palm. Biotropica 1992, 24, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Otero-Arnaiz, A.; Oyama, K. Reproductive Phenology, Seed-Set and Pollination in Chamaedorea Alternans, an Understorey Dioecious Palm in a Rain Forest in Mexico. J. Trop. Ecol. 2001, 17, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Da Silva, P.A.D.; Scariot, A. Phenology, Biometric Parameters and Productivity of Fruits of the Palm Butia Capitata (Mart.) Beccari in the Brazilian Cerrado in the North of the State of Minas Gerais. Acta Bot. Bras. 2013, 27, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Coomes, D.A.; Allen, R.B. Effects of Size, Competition and Altitude on Tree Growth. J. Ecol. 2007, 95, 1084–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gray, R.E.J.; Ewers, R.M. Monitoring Forest Phenology in a Changing World. Forests 2021, 12, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rojas-Robles, R.; Stiles, F.G. Analysis of a Supra-Annual Cycle: Reproductive Phenology of the Palm Oenocarpus Bataua in a Forest of the Colombian Andes. J. Trop. Ecol. 2009, 25, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cifuentes, L.; Moreno, F.; Arango, D.A. Reproductive Phenology and Fruit Productivity of Oenocarpus Bataua (Mart.) in Flooded Forests in the Chocó Biogeographic Region, Colombia. Biota Neotrop. 2010, 10, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cabrera, W.H.; Wallace, R. Patrones fenológicos de ocho especies de palmeras en un bosque amazónico de Bolivia. Rev. Bol. Ecol. Cons. Amb. 2007, 21, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nord, E.A.; Lynch, J.P. Plant Phenology: A Critical Controller of Soil Resource Acquisition. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1927–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kiltie, R.A. Distribution of Palm Fruits on a Rain Forest Floor: Why White-Lipped Peccaries Forage near Objects. Biotropica 1981, 13, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abbott, D.L.; Bull, V.; Bishop, S.N. Effect of Summer Temperature on Flower Initiation; Report of the Long Ashton Research Station; University of Bristol: Bristol, UK, 1974; Volume 1973, pp. 31–32. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tromp, J. Flower-Bud Formation and Shoot Growth in Apple as Affected by Temperature. Sci. Hortic. 1976, 5, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ichimura, K.; Suto, K. Environmental Factors Controlling Flower Opening and Closing in a Portulaca Hybrid. Ann. Bot. 1998, 82, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ashwell, I.Y. Mountain Weather and Climate, Roger, G. Barry, Methuen, London, 1981, No. of Pages; 313. Rice: £17.50. J. Climatol. 1982, 2, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kimball, S.; Gremer, J.R.; Angert, A.L.; Huxman, T.E.; Venable, D.L. Fitness and Physiology in a Variable Environment. Oecologia 2012, 169, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Location map of the study area in the “Los Amigos” Biological Station in the Madre de Dios Region, Peru. LABL: “Los Amigos” Biological Station.
Figure 1. Location map of the study area in the “Los Amigos” Biological Station in the Madre de Dios Region, Peru. LABL: “Los Amigos” Biological Station.
Forests 12 01424 g001
Figure 2. (A) O. mapora in its natural habitat, (B) Flower bud, (C) Open flower, (D) Unripe fruits and (E) Ripe fruits.
Figure 2. (A) O. mapora in its natural habitat, (B) Flower bud, (C) Open flower, (D) Unripe fruits and (E) Ripe fruits.
Forests 12 01424 g002
Figure 3. Rainfall and monthly temperature between June 2019 to January 2020 in the Madre de Dios Region, Peru. Months are represented by their first three letters. Max: Maximum, Min: Minimum.
Figure 3. Rainfall and monthly temperature between June 2019 to January 2020 in the Madre de Dios Region, Peru. Months are represented by their first three letters. Max: Maximum, Min: Minimum.
Forests 12 01424 g003
Figure 4. Intensity of phenophases of O. mapora for low-terrace (A) and high-terrace forests (B) of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.
Figure 4. Intensity of phenophases of O. mapora for low-terrace (A) and high-terrace forests (B) of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.
Forests 12 01424 g004
Table 1. Geographical characterization of the trails evaluated in the study.
Table 1. Geographical characterization of the trails evaluated in the study.
TrailHabitatLength (m)Altitude (m asl)LongitudeLatitude
CarreteraLow-terrace forest2674250–300−70.094397−12.576631
PlayaLow-terrace forest676250–270−70.088417−12.570647
CochaloboLow-terrace forest1584250–275−70.098553−12.570858
BajíoLow-terrace forest1387250–286−70.083242−12.565974
YungunturoHigh-terrace forest1199285–300−70.089977−12.562769
CarrizoHigh-terrace forest956268–300−70.094028−12.567466
Primer miradorHigh-terrace forest2372250–300−70.094459−12.561381
Segundo miradorHigh-terrace forest3409264–300−70.099235−12.547318
CastañalHigh-terrace forest1870270–300−70.104610−12.551184
Table 2. Main characteristics of O. mapora in low-terrace and high-terrace forests in the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.
Table 2. Main characteristics of O. mapora in low-terrace and high-terrace forests in the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.
ParameterLow-Terrace Forest
(n = 84)
High-Terrace Forest
(n = 132)
Height (m)10.52 ± 2.9311.95 ± 1.89 *
Number of mature green leaves per individual8.07 ± 1.407.84 ± 1.35 *
Number of bunches per individual1.55 ± 0.671.42 ± 0.60 *
* Differences between groups were evaluated using the Mann Whitney U test., p < 0.05.
Table 3. Weighted mean of phenological variables in low-terrace and high-terrace forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.
Table 3. Weighted mean of phenological variables in low-terrace and high-terrace forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.
HabitatMature Green LeavesBunchesFlower BudsOpen FlowersUnripe FruitsRipe Fruits
Low-terrace forest
Mean date222
(10 August 2019)
223
(11 August 2019)
182
(1 July 2019)
231
(19 August 2019)
244
(1 September 2019)
226
(14 August 2019)
High-terrace forest
Mean date222
(10 August 2019)
224
(12 August 2019)
184
(3 July 2019)
231
(19 August 2019)
254
(11 September 2019)
185
(4 July 2019)
Data were expressed in Julian days.
Table 4. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (Rs) between monthly phenological variables and environmental factors in low-terrace and high-terrace forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.
Table 4. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (Rs) between monthly phenological variables and environmental factors in low-terrace and high-terrace forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru.
VariablesHabitatTemperatureRainfallNumber of Days of
Precipitation
AverageMaximumMinimum
HeightLow-terrace forest
High-terrace forest
0.526
−0.761 *
0.451
−0.638
0.801 *
−0.896 **
0.801 *
−0.896 **
0.743 *
−0.722 *
Number of Mature Green LeavesLow-terrace forest
High-terrace forest
−0.552
0.401
−0.552
0.250
−0.430
0.451
−0.381
0.375
−0.173
0.315
Number of BunchesLow-terrace forest
High-terrace forest
0.132
−0.073
0.419
0.146
−0.180
−0.073
−0.036
0.146
−0.277
0.012
Flower Buds Low-terrace forest
High-terrace forest
−0.790 *
−0.181
−0.946 **
−0.361
−0.443
−0.253
−0.515
−0.422
−0.090
−0.194
Open FlowersLow-terrace forest
High-terrace forest
0.144
−0.048
0.419
0.262
−0.563
−0.619
−0.443
−0.500
−0.789 *
−0.766 *
Unripe FruitsLow-terrace forest
High-terrace forest
0.407
0.482
0.539
0.711 *
−0.132
0.024
0.036
0.241
−0.283
−0.182
Ripe FruitsLow-terrace forest
High-terrace forest
−0.277
0.108
−0.337
−0.193
0.337
0.687
0.410
0.615
0.612
0.861 **
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Best, I.; Rengifo, H.; Velarde, E.; Loja, J.F.; Portugal, A.; Rengifo, P.; Aguilar, L.; Ramos-Escudero, F.; Muñoz, A.M. Phenology of Oenocarpus mapora H. Karst in Low-Terrace and High-Terrace Forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru. Forests 2021, 12, 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101424

AMA Style

Best I, Rengifo H, Velarde E, Loja JF, Portugal A, Rengifo P, Aguilar L, Ramos-Escudero F, Muñoz AM. Phenology of Oenocarpus mapora H. Karst in Low-Terrace and High-Terrace Forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru. Forests. 2021; 12(10):1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Best, Ivan, Helmut Rengifo, Ernesto Velarde, Juan Francisco Loja, Alan Portugal, Piero Rengifo, Luis Aguilar, Fernando Ramos-Escudero, and Ana María Muñoz. 2021. "Phenology of Oenocarpus mapora H. Karst in Low-Terrace and High-Terrace Forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru" Forests 12, no. 10: 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101424

APA Style

Best, I., Rengifo, H., Velarde, E., Loja, J. F., Portugal, A., Rengifo, P., Aguilar, L., Ramos-Escudero, F., & Muñoz, A. M. (2021). Phenology of Oenocarpus mapora H. Karst in Low-Terrace and High-Terrace Forests of the Madre de Dios Region, Peru. Forests, 12(10), 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101424

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop