Next Article in Journal
Delivery of Ecosystem Services by Community Woodland Groups and Their Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Forest Fire on Understory Species Diversity in Canary Pine Ecosystems on the Island of La Palma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mycophagy of White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus Zimmermann) in the Boreal Forest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Plant Tannins and Essential Oils Have an Additive Deterrent Effect on Diet Choice by Kangaroos

by
Christine Rafferty
1,2 and
Byron B. Lamont
1,*
1
Ecology Section, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
2
Whiteman Park, Whiteman, WA 6068, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2021, 12(12), 1639; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121639
Submission received: 7 November 2021 / Revised: 22 November 2021 / Accepted: 22 November 2021 / Published: 26 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecology of Plant-Herbivore Interactions)

Abstract

:
Tannins and essential oils are well recognised as antiherbivore compounds. We investigated the relative effectiveness of the polyphenol, tannin, and the essential oils, 1,8-cineole and pine oil, as feeding deterrents against western grey kangaroos. Both groups of secondary metabolites are naturally abundant in many Australian plants. These three metabolite groups were incorporated separately or together into standard pellets for presentation to kangaroos, and their behaviour (sequence of food choice and feeding time) and amounts consumed were observed. The control (with no secondary metabolites) was much preferred. There was a sharp reduction in the ingestion of pellets containing tannins, 1,8-cineole or pine oil. Combinations of the metabolites resulted in almost no consumption. In association with tannin, pellets containing either 1,8-cineole or pine oil were as effective deterrents as both combined. There was a strong correlation between time spent feeding on the different diets and the amount of food consumed, although the rate of intake was markedly slower when secondary metabolites were present. Behavioural observations showed that the amount of food ingested is initially guided by the presence/absence of essential oils, apparently detected by smell, and later by the presence/absence of tannins, by taste. Both groups of secondary metabolites work in concert by stimulating different senses that minimise herbivory by marsupials, such as the western grey kangaroo, and help to explain their abundance in the Australian flora.

1. Introduction

Tannins (polyphenolics) and essential oils (terpenoids) co-occur in several families well represented, if not dominant, in the Australian flora and elsewhere, especially in the families Lamiaceae, Mimosaceae, Myrtaceae, and Rutaceae [1,2,3,4]. These secondary plant metabolites are well established as antiherbivore chemicals in many parts of the world [3,5,6]. Tannins are usually non-volatile and inhibit nitrogen assimilation [7], binding readily to proteins and inhibiting digestive enzyme function and/or reducing absorption of dietary protein [8]. Tannins are therefore potent feeding deterrents among mammals [9]. Essential oils are volatile and aromatic. They block the stimulatory effects of sugars on palatability [10], inhibit the action of bacteria involved in digestion and block the action of digestive enzymes [11,12,13]. Formylated phloroglucinol metabolites (non-volatile combinations of condensed tannins and terpenes) are also potent antifeeding chemicals in eucalypts, the dominant tree in Australian forests and woodlands (Myrtaceae [14]).
We examined which metabolites—tannin or essential oils—are pivotal in diet selection by the western grey kangaroo (Macropus fuliginosus (Desmarest, 1817), and therefore their relative importance in deterring herbivory among plants. Western grey kangaroos are facultative browsers, but in the absence of grasslands, they are routinely browsers in heathlands to forests, where both essential-oil- and tannin-bearing plants dominate the ground flora [2,15]. The study was conducted with semi-domesticated animals at the Perth Zoo, Western Australia, using their usual diet modified to incorporate tannin, as oenotannin, and two aromatic metabolites: 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol)—common in Australian plants [3], and pine oil—containing a number of terpenes including α pinene, present in eucalypts [16]. Both 1,8-cineole and metabolites in pine oil are reported in the foliage of myrtaceous species with essential oils averaging 1–20% dry weight [3], while phenolics have been noted in the range 2–17% dry weight for shrub species in a wide range of taxa and life stages [2,4,17] and tannins (as a subset) up to 9% in juvenile plants [18].
Among ringtail and brushtail possums fed a synthetic diet of 1,8-cineole and jensenone, a non-volatile formylated phloroglucinol, Lawler et al. [19] noted that the jensenone determined how much the animal ate, while the presence of 1,8-cineole provided a learned cue about the presence of jensenone. Hunt et al. [20] undertook a parallel trial with red kangaroos that learned to use odour cues to avoid ingesting bitter alkaloids in solution. If essential oils have an inhibitory effect in their own right, as noted above, then they should have an additional deterrent effect when combined with tannin rather than the effect remaining unchanged, as expected with a learned cueing (‘Pavlovian’) response. Thus, we tested three hypotheses: (a) the presence of tannin reduces food consumption by western grey kangaroos, (b) the presence of essential oils reduces food consumption by kangaroos, and (c) there is an additive effect when the two groups of metabolites are combined. Since the aromatic essential oils should be detected by smell and the non-volatile tannins by taste, an ancillary hypothesis was that diets lacking either or just tannin would be selected before those containing essential oils, independent of the presence of tannin.

2. Materials and Methods

The western grey kangaroos at Perth Zoo, Western Australia, were selected for use in the trials as they are accustomed to human contact, allowing for their close observation, and our previous work on this population showed that their food choice behaviour was matched with that in the wild [20]. Presentations were made in the Australian Bushwalk exhibit, covering an area of 0.5 ha, in the feeding area frequented by six western greys, although several red kangaroos and wallabies also used the area. Kangaroo pellets (Glenforest Stockfeeds, Perth, Western Australia), the primary component of macropod diets at Perth Zoo, were modified via the addition of three metabolites: oenotannin (ellagic tannin derived from chestnut (Castanea sativa) wood, Laffort Oenologie, Bordeaux, France, laffort.com/en/products/tanin-oenologique-2), pine oil (derived from Pinus pinaster, containing α and β pinene, Range Products, St. Pacoima, CA, USA), and 1,8-cineole (C10H16O, eucalyptol BPC, Faulding, Sydney, Australia). These compounds were incorporated into the pellets during manufacture of regular kangaroo pellets (at Glenforest Stockfeeds). Pine oil and 1,8-cineole were added at a concentration of 2% pellet dry weight, while tannin was added at 10% pellet dry weight (three treatments plus control). For treatments incorporating more than one metabolite, the same concentrations were used; thus, concentrations were cumulative (1,8-cineole-tannin, pine-oil-tannin, 1,8-cineole-pine-oil, 1,8-cineole-pine-oil-tannin). Samples were sealed in plastic wrap and placed in jars immediately after manufacture. Post-trial chemical analysis of pellets yielded the same concentrations of metabolites at the beginning of the study (gas chromatography–mass spectrometry screening). The smell of essential oils, as detected by the human nose, was also similar to that noted at the time of manufacture.
The weather was mild during the trial, which was undertaken throughout a single day until all replicates were presented. Treatments were randomly allocated in groups of four, such that the eight treatments were offered with every two successive presentations (Figure 1). This was to ensure that kangaroos were not overwhelmed by the presentation of all treatments at once. The eight treatments were numbered 1 to 8; then, their order was repeatedly randomised in fours for each pair of presentations. This was continued until (4 × 2) × 10 presentations were offered with ten random replicates per treatment. A black plastic tray (30 × 40 cm) with small plastic dishes with pellets in each of the corners (diameter 12 cm) was used per treatment. These were spaced sufficiently far apart (2 m) to allow kangaroos to consciously select between the four treatments and restrict the aroma of neighbouring pellets interfering in the selection process. Normal feeding regimes were maintained, and care was taken to keep human disturbance to a minimum.
Preliminary test trials involving the same animals were conducted to provide an indication of the level of their interest. A sufficient volume of each treatment type was required to ensure preferred pellets did not run out, leading animals to eat less-preferred types and possibly confound the results. It was concluded from the trials run during the day before the study that 100 g (25 g per dish) of each treatment per presentation was ideal, with trays able to be visited by kangaroos for a total of five minutes. Presentation time was halved if two kangaroos visited together, and so on, to quantify feeding frequencies between trays relative to kangaroo participation. The timing of presentations was paused with the departure of the feeding kangaroos and restarted when the same or another individual approached. Since other macropods reside within the enclosure, it was necessary to cancel presentations when interrupted by other marsupials. At the end of each presentation, the remaining pellets per treatment were bulked, bagged, and weighed later.
Kangaroos were observed throughout pellet presentations, and behavioural activity was noted. Order of pellet selection was recorded, and a tally was made of the first treatment selected in each presentation. A total of six kangaroos visited the trays to feed, four females and two juveniles, although in which order they visited was not monitored as we were only interested in the role of food type on feeding. While all animals participated in the trial, the four adults fed more often and apparently equally in number of visits, although this was not quantified (the distinctive markings on each animal made it easy to identify individuals). For presentations where more than one kangaroo participated, only the first treatment eaten was recorded, as selection by the second or third kangaroo was often determined by what was remaining to feed upon. String was attached to each tray, and if under visit by a kangaroo when the time was up, the tray was pulled away by the observer.

Statistical Analyses

Two-way analyses of variance were performed on consumption and feeding times for the ± tannin ± 1,8-cineole/pine oil treatments (SPSS for Mac OS X, 2002, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Order of pellet selection was regressed against amount consumed to indicate if selection order was indicative of overall feeding preferences. Fisher’s Exact test was used on the order of diet selection. First preference among the aromatic treatments was compared with the nonaromatic by contingency table analysis. Time spent feeding was regressed against food ingested to determine if the former could be used as a surrogate for the latter.

3. Results

3.1. Amount Consumed

The two-way analysis of variance showed highly significant tannin (p < 0.001) and essential oil (p < 0.001) effects, with no interaction (Table 1). The control group was consumed 3–4 times more readily than when tannin, 1,8-cineole, or pine oil were added. When individual essential oils were combined with tannin, consumption was <5% of the control. 1,8-cineole and pine oil present together were sufficient to reduce consumption to either alone with tannin.

3.2. Feeding Times

The two-way analysis of variance showed highly significant tannin (p < 0.001) and essential oil (p < 0.001) effects, with no interaction (Table 1). The amount consumed was well correlated with the time spent feeding per visit (R2 = 0.976, Figure 2). However, kangaroos took longer to consume pellets containing tannins and/or essential oils. Time spent feeding on the control group was 1.5–2.7 times longer than any of the single-metabolite-added treatments, but the rate of consumption (seconds/gram) was 1.9–2.1 times slower. When individual essential oils were combined with tannin, time spent feeding was 5.5–13.0% of the control. The rate of consumption of the pine oil treatment in the presence of tannin was particularly slow (2.9–3.8 times slower rate than the control).

3.3. Order of Preference

Contingency analysis showed that the two treatments lacking essential oils (11 visits, of 15 possible, as these treatments were not always present among the 20 sets of four) were more likely to be selected before the six aromatic treatments (four first visits) when random visits would have shown the reverse (p = 0.0253, two-tailed). When the control was removed from the order of selection (as it tended to be the first or second choice and accounted for about three times the amount eaten as the next choice, greatly affecting the correlation), the order of choice for the next seven treatments was completely random and unrelated to the order of amount consumed (p > 0.1000).

4. Discussion

The individual addition of three sources of secondary metabolites—tannin, 1,8-cineole, and pine oil—greatly reduces the acceptability of pellets to western grey kangaroos (Table 1). In Australia, only specialist mammals are observed to consume foliage containing essential oils, despite its abundance in key elements of the flora over many millions of years [21]. The kangaroos tended to avoid the 1,8-cineole- and pine-oil-rich pellets, with their aromatic properties providing an olfactory cue [19,20] and their bitterness apparently providing a later taste cue to their unpalatability. This was supported by the kangaroos choosing pellets lacking essential oils to taste first. In the absence of other cues as to their presence, this confirms that the large ellagitannin molecules are non-volatile, and so the pellets containing them lacked a detectable aroma. Jones et al. [1] concluded that the absence of any herbivory by kangaroos in five of seven myrtaceous genera/species (in contrast to morphologically matched nonaromatic control species) must have been due to their emission of aromatic essential oils. Not until 1,8-cineole and pine oil were combined (4% air dry weight) was consumption reduced to negligible levels (1%) compared with their effects alone. This further supports that the intensity of the aroma was the key to feeding rather than the actual chemical composition of the essential oils, noting that the pine oil was a mixture of three compounds. While the concentration and range of essential oils are within acceptable bounds [1,3], this does not negate the possibility that the tannins present in aromatic species might still have an antiherbivore function as their role is different (see Introduction).
Tannin alone was highly effective at reducing consumption (and equally effective as the essential oils alone), confirming earlier feeding trials with other semi-wild kangaroos that used plant species and synthetic diets with different levels of tannin content [22,23]. The requirement to taste before rejection may account for part-ingestion of foliage containing relatively high levels of tannins, despite their overall negative correlation with total consumption [22]. Time spent feeding mimicked consumption amounts, although kangaroos took longer to consume pellets if they contained tannin and/or essential oils (Figure 2). Thus, to ingest 10 g of pellets containing these metabolites took, on average, 25% longer than to consume 10 g of the controls. Deterrence was greatest when tannin and individual essential oils were combined such that total pellet consumption approached zero. Thus, essential oils must have an inhibitory role in their own right (see Introduction), rather than just as a cue to the presence of high tannin levels, especially as tannin/polyphenolic concentrations are just as high in many nonaromatic species [2,4].
We accept that a sample of six animals is small. However, one advantage was that it meant that the design could be kept compact without having to prepare large quantities of the special feeds, and dishes and trays were easily handled and replaced. Second, the lack of crowding around the trays meant that the two observers could easily monitor which treatment was visited first, one of the key objectives of the trial. Third, kangaroos could move unimpeded toward the preferred treatment without other animals interfering (getting in the way physically or being aggressive) to alter the actual treatment visited. Besides, this same group of animals had been shown to match the feeding behaviour of wild kangaroos in an earlier study that was based on living plant material [22].

5. Conclusions

Based on a synthetic diet that removes other confounding factors present in a previous study of western grey kangaroos at Perth Zoo using actual species foliage [22], our study highlights the cumulative effect of different secondary metabolites in reducing the acceptability of potential plant food. While the detection of essential oils via smell and tannins via taste is well known [24], this is the first time that a clear temporal aspect has been demonstrated: a diet high in aromatic essential oils is avoided first, while a diet high in tannins is only avoided later after initial tasting [1]. Since all aromatic species contain tannins, it seems likely that they act additively to deter herbivory, independently of the target animal’s sense of smell. A negative correlation between tannin/phenolic levels and levels of herbivory is recorded frequently in multivariate trials that include aromatic species [16,17,20,25,26,27]. We conclude that plant consumption by western grey kangaroos is deterred by both their essential oil and tannin contents, that the effect is additive, and that essential oils are detected initially by smell (and apparently later by taste) while tannins are detected (later) by taste. This is consistent with aromatic species experiencing much lower levels of herbivory than (matched) nonaromatic species [1].
We note that many secondary metabolites invariably have alternative/additional functions that are more related to physiological adaptations to heat and drought, and so it does not follow that they necessarily are involved in plant-animal relations. However, our work shows that the most widespread and abundant secondary metabolites in the Australian flora—tannins and essential oils—also have a vital role in reducing herbivory by the indigenous fauna (see reference list). Among western grey kangaroos, it may be significant that aromatic species are not even given a preliminary nibble before rejection, unlike those high in tannin [1], although our results indicate that this may be concentration-dependent. Western greys are facultative browsers and readily graze grasslands in the wild and in captivity, where aromatic species are conspicuously absent. Given a choice, grass-like species (Poaceae, Restionaceae, Cyperaceae) are always preferred in the diet of this kangaroo, and these tend to occur bunched in woody vegetation [17,28]. If this preference has a phylogenetic basis, it might explain their unexpected aversion to the many shrubs in forests that possess essential oils that would normally be expected to be included in the diet of obligate browsers [9,29].
An understanding of the factors driving dietary selection among kangaroos should provide much-needed information on plant species that are suitable for parks, reserves, zoo exhibits, and semirural properties (with gardens), and rehabilitation of post-disturbed lands [18]. Herbivore-resistant species may be identified according to the presence of particular secondary metabolites without the need for trial-and-error plantings. The formulation of suitable carrier agents and application methods for such metabolites may provide species highly sensitive to herbivory a greater chance of survival (especially at the seedling stage), reducing the need for physical protection methods such as plant guards and fencing.

Author Contributions

C.R. designed and undertook the trial. C.R. and B.B.L. shared analyses of the data and writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Our research was funded by the Australian Research Council (Linkage Scheme), Curtin University, Whiteman Park, Alcoa World Alumina and Worsley Alumina.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Means and standard errors for all the data are given in Table 1. Further information is available in Rafferty, C. 2005. Selective herbivory by western grey kangaroos following a fire at Whiteman Park Reserve, Perth, Western Australia. PhD Thesis, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Warren Potts at Glenforest Stockfeeds for formulation and manufacture of kangaroo pellets, Helen Robertson and the staff at Perth Zoo, the Chemistry Centre of Western Australia, Mark Hayman for assistance with pellet presentation, Mick Hanley for help with the randomization design, and Pat and Lyn Rafferty for aid in trial preparation. The trial was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee at Perth Zoo.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jones, A.; Lamont, B.B.; Fairbanks, M.M.; Rafferty, C.M. Kangaroos avoid eating seedlings with or near others with volatile essential oils. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 2621–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rafferty, C.; Lamont, B.B. Selective herbivory by mammals on 19 species planted at two densities. Acta Oecol. 2007, 32, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Keszei, A.; Brubaker, C.L.; Foley, W.J. A molecular perspective on terpene variation in Australian Myrtaceae. Aust. J. Bot. 2008, 56, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Read, J.; Sanson, G.D.; Caldwell, E.; Clissford, F.J.; Chatain, A.; Peters, P.; Lamont, B.B.; de Garine-Wichatitisky, M.; Jaffré, T.; Kerr, S. Correlations between leaf toughness and phenolics among species in contrasting environments of Australia and New Caledonia. Ann. Bot. 2019, 103, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hanley, M.E.; Lamont, B.B.; Fairbanks, M.M.; Rafferty, C.M. Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 8, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Takahashi, A.; Shimada, T. Selective consumption of acorns by the Japanese wood mouse according to tannin content: A behavioral countermeasure against plant secondary metabolites. Ecol. Res. 2008, 23, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barthelmess, E.L. The effects of tannin and protein on food preference in eastern grey squirrels. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2001, 13, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Swain, T. Phenolics in the environment. In Biochemistry of Plant Phenolics; Swain, T., Harborne, J.B., Van Sumere, C.F., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 617–640. [Google Scholar]
  9. Navon, S.; Kigel, J.; Dudai, N.; Knaanie, A.; Glasser, T.A.; Shachter, A.; Ungar, E.D. Volatiles and tannins in Pistacia lentiscus and their role in browsing behavior of goats (Capra hircus). J. Chem. Ecol. 2020, 46, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jansen, B.J.M.; de Groot, A. The synthesis of drimane sesquiterpenoids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1991, 8, 319–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jedlickova, Z.; Mottl, O.; Sery, V. Antibacterial properties of the Vietnamese cajeput oil and ocimum oil in combination with antibacterial agents. J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microbiol. Immunol. 1992, 36, 303–309. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kohl, K.D.; Pitman, E.; Robb, B.C.; Connelly, J.W.; Dearing, M.D.; Forbey, J.S. Monoterpenes as inhibitors of digestive enzymes and counter-adaptations in a specialist avian herbivore. J. Comp. Physiol. B 2015, 18, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Skopec, M.M.; Adams, R.P.; Muir, J.P. Terpenes may serve as feeding deterrents and foraging cues for mammalian herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 2019, 45, 993–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lawler, I.R.; Foley, W.J.; Eschler, B.M. Foliar concentration of a single toxin creates habitat patchiness for a marsupial folivore. Ecology 2000, 81, 1327–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shephard, K.A.; Wardell-Johnson, G.W.; Loneragan, W.A.; Bell, D.T. Diet of herbivorous marsupials in a Eucalyptus marginata forest and thir impact on the understorey vegetation. J. R. Soc. West. Aust. 1997, 80, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  16. Brophy, J.J.; Southwell, I.A. Eucalyptus chemistry. In Eucalyptus; Coppen, J.J.W., Ed.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2002; pp. 102–160. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rafferty, C.; Lamont, B.B.; Hanley, M.E. Selective feeding by kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) on seedlings of Hakea species: Effects of chemical and physical defences. Plant Ecol. 2005, 177, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Parsons, M.H.; Rafferty, C.M.; Lamont, B.B.; Dods, D.; Fairbanks, M.M. Relative effects of mammal herbivory and plant spacing on seedling recruitment following fire and mining. BMC Ecol. 2007, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Lawler, I.R.; Foley, W.J.; Eschler, B.M.; Handayde, K. Intraspecific variation in Eucalyptus secondary metabolites determines food intake by folivorous marsupials. Oecologia 2000, 116, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hunt, M.; Slotnick, B.; Croft, D. Olfactory function in the red kangaroo (Macropus rufus) assessed using odor-cued taste avoidance. Physiol. Behav. 1999, 67, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Crisp, M.D.; Burrows, G.E.; Cook, L.G.; Thornhill, A.H.; Bowman, D.M. Flammable biomes dominated by eucalypts originated at the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Rafferty, C.M.; Lamont, B.B.; Hanley, M.E. Herbivore feeding preferences in captive and wild populations. Austral Ecol. 2010, 35, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Parsons, M.H.; Lamont, B.B.; Davies, S.J.J.F.; Kovacs, B.R. How energy and co-available foods affect the currency of forage for the western grey kangaroo. Anim. Behav. 2006, 71, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hansen, S.C.; Stolter, C.; Imholt, C.; Jacob, J. Plant secondary metabolites as rodent repellents: A systematic review. J. Chem. Ecol. 2016, 42, 970–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hanley, M.E.; Lamont, B.B. Herbivory, serotiny and seedling defence in Western Australian Proteaceae. Oecologia 2001, 126, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hanley, M.E.; Lamont, B.B. Relationships between physical and chemical attributes of congeneric seedlings: How important is seedling defence? Funct. Ecol. 2002, 16, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Parsons, M.H.; Koch, J.M.; Lamont, B.B.; Vlahos, S.; Fairbanks, M. Planting density effects and selective herbivory by kangaroos on species used in restoring forest communities. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 229, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lamont, B.B.; Groom, P.K. Seed and seedling biology of the woody-fruited Proteaceae. Aust. J. Bot. 1998, 46, 387–406. [Google Scholar]
  29. Utsumi, S.A.; Cibils, A.F.; Estell, R.E.; Soto-Navarro, S.A.; Chen, L.; Hallford, D.M. Effects of adding protein, condensed tannins, and polyethylene glycol to diets of sheep and goats fed one-seed juniper and low quality roughage. Small Rumin. Res. 2013, 112, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Arrangement and order of presentation of each of the eight treatments, numbered 1 to 8, with four dishes of pellets of that treatment per dish, presented in pairs of four, and randomised within each pair, until presentation of all treatments was replicated ten times. Trays were 2 m apart and had strings attached so that they could be pulled away when the time was up.
Figure 1. Arrangement and order of presentation of each of the eight treatments, numbered 1 to 8, with four dishes of pellets of that treatment per dish, presented in pairs of four, and randomised within each pair, until presentation of all treatments was replicated ten times. Trays were 2 m apart and had strings attached so that they could be pulled away when the time was up.
Forests 12 01639 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between time spent feeding and number of pellets consumed per kangaroo visitor (mean ± se). The solid line is fitted to all means except the control, while the broken line is fitted between the control and origin only. This shows that the kangaroos take somewhat longer to consume a given number of pellets that contain tannins and/or essential oils.
Figure 2. Relationship between time spent feeding and number of pellets consumed per kangaroo visitor (mean ± se). The solid line is fitted to all means except the control, while the broken line is fitted between the control and origin only. This shows that the kangaroos take somewhat longer to consume a given number of pellets that contain tannins and/or essential oils.
Forests 12 01639 g002
Table 1. Pellets consumed and time spent feeding [mean (standard error), 10 replicates] by western grey kangaroos in a tannin–essential oil interaction trial with eight treatments at Perth Zoo, Western Australia.
Table 1. Pellets consumed and time spent feeding [mean (standard error), 10 replicates] by western grey kangaroos in a tannin–essential oil interaction trial with eight treatments at Perth Zoo, Western Australia.
TanninControl1,8-CineolePine OilPine Oil
+1,8-Cineole
Pellets consumed (g) *Absent34.8 (6.9)12.4 (4.2)7.2 (2.4)1.0 (0.4)
Present10.4 (2.9)1.4 (0.7)1.6 (0.6)1.2 (0.4)
Time spent feeding (s)Absent56.0 (7.1)24.7 (8.2)14.0 (4.5)1.3 (0.5)
Present22.7 (6.3)1.0 (2.0)4.7 (1.8)4.7 (1.6)
* 100 g supplied.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rafferty, C.; Lamont, B.B. Plant Tannins and Essential Oils Have an Additive Deterrent Effect on Diet Choice by Kangaroos. Forests 2021, 12, 1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121639

AMA Style

Rafferty C, Lamont BB. Plant Tannins and Essential Oils Have an Additive Deterrent Effect on Diet Choice by Kangaroos. Forests. 2021; 12(12):1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121639

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rafferty, Christine, and Byron B. Lamont. 2021. "Plant Tannins and Essential Oils Have an Additive Deterrent Effect on Diet Choice by Kangaroos" Forests 12, no. 12: 1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121639

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop