Next Article in Journal
Quantification of One-Year Gypsy Moth Defoliation Extent in Wonju, Korea, Using Landsat Satellite Images
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Natural Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Bamboo Groves in Urban Forests
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/f12050544
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Climate Change on Potential Distribution of Chinese White Pine Beetle Dendroctonus armandi in China

by
Hang Ning
1,2,
Ming Tang
1,2 and
Hui Chen
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2021, 12(5), 544; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12050544
Submission received: 15 March 2021 / Revised: 24 April 2021 / Accepted: 26 April 2021 / Published: 27 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dendroctonus armandi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytidae) is a bark beetle native to China and is the most destructive forest pest in the Pinus armandii woodlands of central China. Due to ongoing climate warming, D. armandi outbreaks have become more frequent and severe. Here, we used Maxent to model its current and future potential distribution in China. Minimum temperature of the coldest month and precipitation seasonality are the two major factors constraining the current distribution of D. armandi. Currently, the suitable area of D. armandi falls within the Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains. The total suitable area is 15.83 × 104 km2. Under future climate scenarios, the total suitable area is projected to increase slightly, while remaining within the Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains. Among the climate scenarios, the distribution expanded the most under the maximum greenhouse gas emission scenario (representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5). Under all assumptions, the highly suitable area is expected to increase over time; the increase will occur in southern Shaanxi, northwest Hubei, and northeast Sichuan Provinces. By the 2050s, the highly suitable area is projected to increase by 0.82 × 104 km2. By the 2050s, the suitable climatic niche for D. armandi will increase along the Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains, posing a major challenge for forest managers. Our findings provide information that can be used to monitor D. armandi populations, host health, and the impact of climate change, shedding light on the effectiveness of management responses.

1. Introduction

The Chinese white pine beetle, Dendroctonus armandi Tsai and Li (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytidae), a bark beetle native to China, is distributed in the Pinus armandii Franch. woodlands of central China [1]. As a pioneer species, this bark beetle invades healthy P. armandii individuals older than 30 years. Subsequently, secondary bark beetles attack the infected or withered hosts, resulting in landscape-level tree mortality [2]. Dendroctonus armandi inhabits and feeds on the phloem of the host [3]. When mature adults search for new host trees, they briefly leave the gallery. It is always the females that break through the first line of defense, by boring through the host’s bark. The females then release aggregation pheromones to attract males for mating and colonization. The females subsequently lay eggs in the phloem, and the larvae excavate feeding tunnels in this tissue [4]. In the Qinling Mountains, the number of beetle generations varies with elevation, with ca. 2 per year below 1700 m, 1.5 per year at 1700–2150 m, and 1 per year above 2150 m [5]. Outbreaks of this beetle have occurred every year in recent decades, altering the ecosystem and causing economic losses.
Because insects are poikilotherms and have short generation times, their life history is closely related to temperature [6]. They are therefore particularly sensitive to the warming associated with climate change, and may be early indicators of local climate change [7]. In recent years, field observations have revealed that the D. armandi outbreak frequency and intensity have increased with the rise in temperature [8,9]. New occurrence records continue to be published [10]. The projected climate changes are likely to alter the characteristics of D. armandi eruptions, and cause alterations in species distributions. It is therefore critical to understand how the geographical distribution of D. armandi in China may respond to climate change, to enable appropriate ongoing forest ecosystem management. To address this, we applied species distribution models (SDMs) to predict climate change-driven habitat shifts for this species.
SDMs have become a major focus of large-scale ecology and biogeography studies. They are widely applied to model plant and insect habitat ranges, assess the effects of global environmental change on species and ecosystems, evaluate the risk of species invasion and spread, and manage and plan habitats for species, communities, and ecosystems [11,12]. Popular SDMs, including BIOCLIM, GARP, BIOMAPPER, DOMAIN, GAM, GLM, CLIMEX, and Maxent, use species occurrence records (presence only, or presence/absence) associated with environmental variables to describe the fundamental niche of a particular species [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. They then project this niche onto the landscape of interest to reflect the potential distribution of the species [21]. Maxent is commonly used because of its excellent predictive performance. Maxent modeling predictions are typically stable and reliable even when species distribution data are incomplete or sample sizes are small [22,23,24].
Effective representation of the geographical distribution of the D. armandi population can provide a reference point for forest managers in the face of climate change. In this study, we used Maxent to model the current distribution of D. armandi in China, and predict its future habitat alterations. This research has three objectives: (1) to identify the dominant environmental variables that describe the distribution range of D. armandi; (2) to map current potential distribution of D. armandi; and (3) to predict future potential distribution of D. armandi under climate change scenarios.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Occurrence Data

Dendroctonus armandi presence data was collected in the field, from May to October 2016–2019. The fieldwork was conducted with the assistance of the Department of Forestry Protection. The distance between the sampling sites was >20 km. When the distance between two or more occurrence points was <20 km, we recorded only one occurrence. First, we judged beetle presence by observing resin-flow from the bark, because P. armandii responds to attack by D. armandi by releasing large amounts of distinctly fluid resin. Further, we used pheromone-baited traps to detect beetle presence in areas with population outbreaks.
The traps consisted of six identical black plastic funnels aligned vertically over a cup (model YBQ-LD-004, Geruibiyuan Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), similar to those commonly used to collect bark beetles. As an attractant we used <bait: mixture of terpenes and pheromones> (Sino-Czech Trading Company, Beijing, China) packed in a 15 mL slow-release polyethylene vial with a release rate of 200 mg/day. Each trap was vertically suspended from a manila rope tied between two host trees at the forest edge and positioned more than 1 m from the closest host tree. The lower end of the trap was 1.5 m above ground. The traps were spaced at least 30 m apart. Liquid paraffin was used as a killing agent in the cups. Trapped D. armandi were collected weekly, counted, and then stored in 70% ethanol. Location name, longitude, latitude, and altitude were documented for all occurrence points. In addition, occurrence records were collected from the literature [1,2,3,4,5,8,9,10]; points without accurate location data were excluded. In total, we obtained 132 point-based occurrence records from the literature and fieldwork (Figure 1).
For the host distribution variable, we gathered presence data for the host P. armandii using three methods. First, we registered P. armandii in the field from 2016 to 2018. Raw data were processed as for the D. armandi data. Second, we obtained P. armandii occurrence data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, http://www.gbif.org (accessed on 27 April 2021)) and the Chinese Virtual Herbarium (CVH, http://www.cvh.org.cn/ (accessed on 27 April 2021)). Although GBIF contains >1000 records, many lack coordinates and altitudes, or are duplicates, and were removed. Third, we consulted the literature for P. armandii occurrence records using a Chinese academic website (https://www.cnki.net/ (accessed on 27 April 2021)). From the all of the above records, we discarded 78 records with incomplete geographic information. In total, 236 P. armandii occurrence records were used to generate its potential distribution via Maxent.

2.2. Environmental Variables

Nineteen bioclimatic variables, three terrain variables, and one host variable were used to predict the potential distribution of D. armandi (Table 1). Nineteen bioclimatic variables, with a spatial resolution of 2.5 arc minutes (approximately 4.7 × 4.7 km), were freely downloaded from www.worldclim.org (accessed on 27 April 2021). Terrain variables were obtained from the United States Geological Survey (USGS, http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30/gtopo30.html (accessed on 27 April 2021)). We used Arc-GIS v.10.2 (Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, CA, USA) to convert all variable layers into ASCII format for use with Maxent. We accessed the National Fundamental Geographic Information System (http://www.ngcc.cn (accessed on 27 April 2021)) and downloaded the National Map as the analytical base map.
We used a dataset on future climate from the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security program (CCAFS, http://ccafs-climate.org/ (accessed on 27 April 2021)) to determine the future distribution of D. armandi under different climate scenarios. Representative concentration pathways (RCPs) were announced in the fifth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. These include four greenhouse-gas concentration trajectories, representing scenarios in which the total radiative forcing in 2100 is 2.6 W/m2, 4.5 W/m2, 6 W/m2, and 8.5 W/m2 (in excess of 1750 W/m2) [25]. We used the BCC-CSM 1.1 climate system model, developed by the Beijing Climate Center, China. After more than ten years of development, its performance and functions have been effectively improved [26]. It has been widely used for climate prediction. Of the four available RCPs, we used RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP 8.5 to model the future distributions of D. armandi in the 2030s and 2050s.
To avoid overfitting of the models due to multicollinearity within environment variables, we selected variables with higher maximum entropy gain and nonzero regression coefficients of LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection) [27,28]. LASSO is a regression analysis method that performs both variable selection and regularization, in order to enhance the prediction accuracy and interpretability of the statistical model. The method regularizes model parameters by shrinking the regression coefficients, reducing some to zero. The feature selection phase occurs after the shrinkage; in this phase, every non-zero value is selected for use in the model. This improves model accuracy because coefficient shrinkage reduces variance and minimizes bias [29]. LASSO was applied using the R package glmnet (http://www.web.stanford.edu/~hastie/Papers/Glmnet_Vignette.pdf (accessed on 27 April 2021)).

2.3. Species Distribution Modelling

We used Maxent v.3.3.1 (http://www.cs.princeton.edu/wschapire/MaxEnt (accessed on 27 April 2021)) to predict the potential distribution of D. armandi. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to train and validate the model. The occurrence dataset was randomly divided into 10 equal-sized subsets. Of these, a single subset was retained as the validation data for testing; the remaining subsets were used as training data. For each subset, 90% of the occurrence data were used to train the single model, and the remaining data were used to test the predictive ability of the model. The mathematical modelling process was provided by the Maxent function in the R package Maxent (https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/maxnet/versions/0.1.2 (accessed on 27 April 2021)). The cross-validation process was repeated 10 times, with each of the 10 subsets used once as validation data. The 10 results were then averaged to produce a single estimation. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the prediction performance of each Maxent model. When the ROC curve is at 45° in the ROC space, the AUC value is close to 0.5, indicating that the model is a random model with an accuracy of 50%; when the AUC > 0.5, the model is more accurate than a random model; when the AUC < 0.5, the model is less accurate than a random model. The closer the AUC is to 1, the better the model performance [30,31]
The impact of sampling bias on species distribution modeling must be noted [32]. Sampling intensity often varies between sites and sampling sites are usually biased toward areas which are more accessible. Oversampling in some geographic spaces can cause repetition in the ecological space when building the model; this will affect simulation of the ecological needs of the species. This kind of sampling bias will generally cause overfitting of niche models to species requirements, thus reducing model transferability [33]. In brief, these situations may result in the observed species distribution not reflecting the real distribution. To counter the sampling bias, “pseudo-absence” with the same spatial bias as the presence points is recommended to be introduced into the model. For this purpose, Arc-GIS v. 10.2 was used to generate 1000 background points throughout China with the same bias [34]. As a result, there were a total of 1132 occurrence points with the same bias in this study. Next, we selected points for model calibration using a subsampling regime to reduce sampling bias and spatial autocorrelation [35]. We generated models using all occurrence points and measured spatial autocorrelation among model pseudo-residuals (1—probability of occurrence generated by model) by calculating Moran’s I at multiple distance classes [36,37]. Significance was determined using permutation tests. A minimum distance of 275 km was detected, so we selected the occurrence point that close to the centroid of each grid cell. This procedure reduced the number of occurrences to 138 points used for model calibration. The procedure greatly reduced sampling bias and spatial autocorrelation, resulting in evenly distributed occurrence points across space [36].
The output layers were imported into Arc-GIS v.10.2 for further analysis, and the final distribution map was generated. Using occurrence records from different sources may cause some sampling bias. A ten-percentile training presence logistic threshold was adopted to define the minimum probability of suitable habitat for D. armandi [38]. Based on this, the habitat suitability of D. armandi was divided into four grades: unsuitable (0–0.1), poorly suitable (0.11–0.3), moderately suitable (0.31–0.6), highly suitable (0.61–1). We then calculated suitable areas under future climate scenarios by multiplying the number of presence grid cells by their spatial resolution.

3. Results

3.1. Model Performance and Variables Selection

When running the training and test dataset independently, the model had robust evaluation metrics: the five-number summary of AUC based on 10-times cross-validation (0.838, 0.878, 0.894, 0.921, 0.946) shows that the model performance was excellent. Based on the regression coefficients and percentage contributions of the environmental variables used in the model, we selected the following five variables as the most important for determining the habitat suitability of D. armandi: minimum temperature of coldest month (Bio6, 1.4832; 29.9%), precipitation seasonality (Bio15, −0.8965; 19.3%), mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio9, 0.7865; 16.8%), annual mean temperature (Bio1, −0.4614; 11.4%), precipitation of driest quarter (Bio17, −0.2488; 9.8%) (Table 2).
The response curves show the quantitative relationship between environmental variables and the habitat suitability, and the responses of five variables to D. armandi suitability are shown in Figure 2. According to the response curves, annual mean temperature (Bio1) ranges from 5.6 to 17.1 °C, minimum temperature of coldest month (Bio6) ranges from −11 to 2 °C, mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio9) ranges from −5 to 7 °C, precipitation seasonality (Bio15) ranges from 63 to 94, and precipitation of driest quarter (Bio17) ranges from 12 to 74 mm. These variables were considered to have a significant effect on the survival of D. armandi.

3.2. Current Potential Distribution of D. armandi

The current potential distribution of D. armandi is located in the Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains, including southern Shaanxi, western Henan, northwest Hubei, north Chongqing, northeast Sichuan, and southeast Gansu Provinces (Figure 3). The highly suitable habitats occur in discontinuous patches, and the moderately suitable habitats are embedded in these patches. The total suitable area amounts to 15.83 × 104 km2. The total areas for highly, moderately, and poorly suitable habitats are 4.41 × 104 km2, 4.97 × 104 km2, and 6.45 × 104 km2, respectively. Among the six provinces, Shaanxi possesses the largest suitable area, amounting to 6.73 × 104 km2.

3.3. Future Potential Distribution of D. armandi

Under future climate scenarios, the potential distribution area of D. armandi is projected to increase slightly (Figure 4a–f). The response was strongest under the RCP 8.5-2050s scenario, with a total suitable area of 16.75 × 104 km2, followed by the RCP 4.5-2050s scenario (Figure 5). The additional suitable area still falls within the Qinling and Daba Mountains. Under all scenarios, the area of highly suitable habitat increases over time.
Under the RCP 2.6-2030s and -2050s scenarios, the area of highly suitable habitat is expected to increase in southern Shaanxi, and the area of poorly suitable habitat is expected to increase in southeast Gansu Provinces. Under the RCP 4.5-2030s scenario, the highly suitable area in southern Shaanxi is projected to increase continually, whereas the poorly and moderately suitable areas are projected to decrease. Under the RCP 4.5-2050s scenario, no change in the poorly suitable habitat area is projected. At the junction of Shaanxi and Hubei Province, the moderately and highly suitable areas are both projected to increase. Under the RCP 8.5 scenario, the highly suitable area is projected to increase in southern Shaanxi, northwest Hubei, and northeast Sichuan Provinces. By the 2050s, the highly suitable area is projected to increase by 0.82×104 km2. Overall, in the near future, D. armandi will gain increasingly suitable climatic space in the Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains.

4. Discussion

Bark beetles comprise a large subfamily of true weevils but only a small fraction of the more than 6000 bark beetle species globally can cause landscape-scale plant mortality [39]. In central China, D. armandi destroys healthy P. armandii forests. Previous research on D. armandi has focused on integrated control. However, because the beetle spends most of its life cycle protected under the bark, measures to prevent and control outbreaks have not been fully effective [40]. Our current SDM analysis makes it possible to classify and monitor its habitat in a targeted way, based on habitat suitability maps. This both reduces the need for service staff, materials, and funding, and improves the efficiency of monitoring work.
Our findings confirmed that D. armandi is restricted to the Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains, despite there being large numbers of hosts in northern and southwestern China. Under all the climate scenarios we studied, the highly suitable area is projected to increase somewhat in the near future. In particular, southern Shaanxi, northwest Hubei, and northeast Sichuan Provinces may become centers of distribution for this species. Although the scale of the changes in suitable area varied among the scenarios, all of the scenarios will present difficulties for forest managers in the coming decades. To address this, better monitoring and management are required in these areas. For instance, regular surveys should be conducted to ensure early detection of outbreaks, and vulnerable forest areas should be identified from maps of projected suitable distributions. Pest populations should be carefully monitored, using both visual inspection and trapping systems; this will help to determine when pest-control activity is needed. Robust forest monitoring and reporting systems should be established, to ensure timely warnings of the effects of climate change on pests and hosts, and to measure the effectiveness of management responses. These procedures are an important step in developing management strategies that integrate monitoring systems and projected climate change impacts, when conducting vulnerability and risk assessments.
In this study, temperature and precipitation were found to be the variables that constrain the current distribution of D. armandi; the minimum temperature of coldest month is particularly important. The complex relationship between temperature and physiological processes affects the geographic distribution of a species [41]. In particular, overwinter survival is a dominant factor limiting the distribution of insects. D. armandi relies on supercooling for overwintering survival. The ability to supercool is a key survival indicator for species living at low temperatures. Among its life-cycle stages, the larvae are considered the most tolerant to cold [42]. During the autumn and winter, the larvae acclimate to decreasing temperatures by increasing cryoprotectant production, thereby reducing their supercooling point. Cold tolerance is dynamic and changes throughout the life-cycle. In the coldest month, January, the supercooling point of larvae decreases to the lowest level (−7.5 ± 0.2 °C). However, it has been reported that −6.0 °C causes 100% larval mortality [43]. Observations of field populations suggested that temperatures below −10 °C reduced larvae survival [44]. In addition, for many species of bark beetle, synchronous adult emergence and life-cycle timing are required to kill the host trees [39]. Synchronous adult emergence is an important regulator of insect seasonality and synchrony, and ultimately of the mean fitness of the population. To improve their chances of surviving adverse conditions such as extreme cold or heat, vulnerable life-cycle stages must be synchronized with the appropriate seasons (the phenomenon known as seasonality). Maintaining an appropriate seasonality is critical for bark beetle population growth and outbreak potential [45]. Disrupted synchronization can severely impact insect populations, even leading to widespread mortality [46]. If the rainfall period becomes intermittent or overlong (for instance, in southern China), this may postpone the emergence of D. armandi adults.
Based on results of variable selection, host distribution has little weight as a predictor variable, and we hypothesize that at the macro-scale level the potential distribution of this beetle is limited more by temperature and precipitation variables than by the host distribution; that is, the distribution of D. armandi is not limited by the host’s distribution. In fact, in many parts of the Qinling and Daba Mountains where P. armandii trees occur, D. armandi was absent. The host species is distributed far more widely than the beetle, including in northern and southwestern China. Moreover, the beetle has high host selectivity and it only attacks P. armandii older than 30 years; that is, there are enough hosts to provide for the beetles. Our findings are similar to those reported for bark beetles in North America. For example, the northward movements of Dendroctonus frontalis in United States were found to be constrained by the minimum annual temperature isotherm [47]. In western Canada, the distribution of Dendroctonus ponderosae, the mountain pine beetle, was found to be limited by the minimum winter temperature [48]. In the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico, the Dendroctonus rhizophagus was found to be limited by the maximum temperature isotherms [49]. However, the host distribution is dynamic in the future and the host tree distribution will respond dynamically to climate change: forest trees may persist via migration, adapt to the new conditions, or become locally extinct [50]. Some predicative results showed the host distribution in Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains, i.e., the occurrence area of this beetle, is conservative and the change is relatively small [51,52]. Therefore, the response of D. armandi to the host may be more prominent in the local geographic range. In addition, it is worth noting that the gaps between the actual dispersal of P. armandii in the real world and that predicted by the models cannot be ignored. As a large-seeded pine species, in particular, it has a short dispersal distance that is limited to the area around the parent trees, and mainly relies on animal dispersal, which are adverse factors affecting its dispersal. Previous studies have indicated that most of the P. armandii seeds were dispersed less than 20 m [53]. In other words, the long-distance seed dispersal events are almost impossible to achieve based on the current dispersal distance, which would mean zero dispersal on the scale of predictive models. Coupled with geographical barriers, such as mountains and rivers, communications between species are almost blocked, ensuring the short-distance dispersal dominates in a local geographic range. Therefore, the research on dispersal of P. armandii seed needs to be explored. This would allow modeling of how the distribution changes of the beetle and its host tree in a local geographical range will be affected by climate change. To summarize, climate change will affect bark beetle–host interactions in complex or nonlinear ways [54,55].
Maxent models describe association between the occurrence of species populations and environmental variables [22]. Usually, tree mortality induced by bark beetle has been correlated with the climate variables describing conditions during the mortality events [56]. Such analyses are usually retrospective, rather than describing the processes leading to plant mortality. Moreover, because these relationships are likely to be different under future climatic conditions, ecosystem models must include phenology data if they are to explain physiological changes in response to a changing climate. The effects of temperature on insect physiology have been studied for decades, with the primary focus being on how temperature affects development time and survival, and how photoperiod and temperature affect diapause [57,58]. Phenological models are driven by the functional relationships between physiological process and temperature, rather than by statistical relationships [59]. Models describing bark beetle phenology require detailed information on the responses of individual beetles. Globally, there are at least 30 bark beetle species that can cause landscape-scale plant mortality [56]. Of these, sufficient data to model climate-driven phenology is available for only six species. Therefore, to model the phenology of D. armandi, we first need to collect detailed physiological information about it. Using this data, we will be able to use a phenological model to predict how temperature will impact life-cycle timing and ultimately population success in this species, based on a quantitative description of the physiological processes that are impacted by temperature.
There are still some limitations in our study. Firstly, there are the relatively low number of geo-references occurrence points in available databases. Moreover, the occurrence points collected through the field are relatively limited. Although the Maxent model has been shown to perform well with a small sample size, the sample size may still affect the accuracy of the model results [60]. Secondly, only 23 environmental variables were used to model the potential distribution of D. armandi, which did not consider the effects of biotic factors, such as dispersal, geographic barriers, competition, predation, and herbivory, that often also play roles in determining species distributions; this is clearly a critical limitation. Finally, although the individual SMD model in this study showed high prediction accuracy, there are still some limitations in prediction precision. The accuracy and performance of individual SMD varies widely among methods and species [61,62]. Some studies have shown that methods integrating multiple individual models provide robust estimates of potential species’ distributions, which provide a means to improve the accuracy of models [63]. All of the factors mentioned above may cause differences between predicted distributions and actual distributions.

5. Conclusions

We used Maxent to map climate habitat for D. armandi, in terms of its climatic niche, based on 132 occurrence records. The minimum temperature of the coldest month and precipitation seasonality constrain its current distribution, which is within the Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains. Under the future climate scenarios that we studied, its total suitable area, as determined by climate, is projected to increase slightly, although remaining within the Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains. The increase in highly suitable habitat will increase the number of potential centers for build-up of D. armandi populations, meaning that an increasing number of host trees will need to be monitored and protected. This will pose a major challenge for forest managers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.N. and H.C.; methodology, H.N.; software, H.N.; investigation, H.N.; writing—original draft preparation, H.N.; writing—review and editing, H.N.; supervision, M.T. and H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 2017YFD0600104 and 31870636, respectively.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the assistance of Ningxi Forestry Bureau in the collection of the occurrence records of D. armandi and its host.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, H.; Tang, M. Spatial and temporal dynamics of bark beetles in Chinese white pine in Qinling mountains of Shaanxi Province, China. Environ. Entomol. 2007, 36, 1124–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tang, M.; Chen, H. Effect of symbiotic fungi of Dendroctonus armandi on host trees. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 1999, 35, 63–66. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, H.; Tang, M.; Ye, H.M.; Yuan, F. Niche of bark beetles within Pinus armandii ecosystem in inner Qinling mountains. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 1999, 35, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dai, L.; Ma, M.; Wang, C.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, R.R.; Chen, H. Cytochrome P450s from the Chinese white pine beetle, Dendroctonus armandi (Curculionidae: Scolytinae): Expression profiles of different stages and responses to host allelochemicals. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 65, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Ma, C.; Li, Z. Chinese white pine beetle, Dendroctonus armandi (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), population density and dispersal estimated by mark-release-recapture in Qinling mountains, Shaanxi, China. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2010, 45, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhang, H.; Lin, J.T. Responses of insects to global warming. J. Environ. Entomol. 2015, 37, 1280–1286. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bale, J.S.; Masters, G.J.; Hodkinson, I.D.; Awmack, C.; Bezemer, T.M. Herbivory in global climate change research: Direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2002, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tang, Y.M.; Hong, M.F. The risk analysis of Chinese white pine beetle in Chang’an forest area, Shaanxi. Shaanxi For. Sci. Technol. 2018, 46, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  9. Feng, S.Y.; Li, T.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H.C. Investigation and control of in Chinese white pine beetle in Foping Nature Reserve, Shaanxi. Shaanxi For. Sci. Technol. 2018, 46, 80–81. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zi, S.L.; Xiong, P.; Ma, L. Preliminary study on the prevention and control of the Chinese white pine beetle in Qinling Mountains and Ta-pa Mountains. J. Green Sci. Technol. 2016, 5, 41–42. [Google Scholar]
  11. Guillera-Arroita, G.; Lahoz-Monfort, J.J.; Elith, J.; Gordon, A.; Kujala, H.; Lentini, P.E.; McCarthy, M.A.; Tingley, R.; Wintle, B.A. Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2015, 24, 276–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Heads, M. The relationship between biogeography and ecology: Envelopes, models, predictions: Biogeography and ecology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2015, 115, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Booth, T.H.; Nix, H.A.; Busby, J.R.; Hutchinson, M.F. BIOCLIM: The first species distribution modelling package, its early applications and relevance to most current Maxent studies. Divers. Distrib. 2014, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stockwell, D.; Peters, D.P. The GARP modelling system: Problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 1999, 13, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hirzel, A.; Guisan, A. Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling. Ecol. Model. 2002, 157, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carpentar, G.; Gillison, A.N.; Winter, J. DOMAIN: A flexible modelling procedure for mapping potential distributions of plants and animals. Biodivers. Conserv. 1993, 2, 667–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yee, T.W.; Mitchell, N.D. Generalized additive models in plant ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 1991, 2, 287–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lehmann, A.; Overton, J.M.; Leathwick, J.R. GRASP: Generalized regression analysis and spatial prediction. Ecol. Model. 2002, 160, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kriticos, D.J.; de Barro, P.J.; Yonow, T.; Ota, N.; Sutherst, R.W. The potential geographical distribution and phenology of Bemisia tabaci Middle East/Asia Minor 1, considering irrigation and glasshouse production. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2020, 110, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, G.Q.; Liu, C.C.; Liu, Y.G.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.S.; Guo, K. Advances in theoretical issues of species distribution models. Sheng Tai Xue Bao 2013, 33, 4827–4835. [Google Scholar]
  22. Elith, J.; Phillips, S.J.; Hastie, T.; Dudík, M.; Chee, Y.E.; Yates, C.J. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 17, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pearson, R.G.; Raxworthy, C.J.; Nakamura, M.; Peterson, A.T. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Phillips, S.J.; Dudík, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 2008, 31, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. IPCC. Climate change 2014: Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report. Available online: http://www.ipcc/report/ar5/syr/ (accessed on 13 April 2015).
  26. Xin, X.G.; Gao, F.; Wei, M.; Wu, T.W.; Fang, Y.J.; Zhang, J. Decadal prediction skill of BCC-CSM1.1 climate model in East Asia. Int. J. Climatol. 2018, 38, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Duque-Lazo, J.; van Gils, H.; Groen, T.A.; Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M. Transferability of species distribution models: The case of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Southwest Spain and Southwest Australia. Ecol. Model. 2016, 320, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 1996, 58, 267–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kukreja, S.L.; Löfberg, J.; Brenner, M.J. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) for nonlinear system identification. IPV 2006, 39, 814–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hanley, J.A.; McNeil, B. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Swets, J. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988, 240, 1285–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Syfert, M.M.; Smith, M.J.; Coomes, D.A. The effects of sampling bias and model complexity on the predictive performance of MaxEnt species distribution models. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, G.P.; Liu, Q.; Gao, Y.B. Improving ecological niche model transferability to predict the potential distribution of invasive exotic species. Biodivers. Sci. 2014, 22, 223–230. [Google Scholar]
  34. Phillips, S.J.; Dudík, M.; Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Lehmann, A.; Leathwick, J.; Ferrier, S. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: Implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 181–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhu, G.P.; Bu, W.J.; Gao, Y.B.; Liu, G.Q. Potential geographic distribution of brown marmorated stink bug invasion (Halyomorpha halys). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nunez, M.A.; Medley, K.A. Pine invasions: Climate predicts invasion success; something else predicts failure. Divers. Distrib. 2011, 17, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rangel, T.F.; Diniz-Filho, J.A.F.; Bini, L.M. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2006, 15, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bean, W.T.; Stafford, R.; Brashares, J.S. The effects of small sample size and sample bias on threshold selection and accuracy assessment of species distribution models. Ecography 2012, 35, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bentz, B.J.; Régnière, J.; Fettig, C.J.; Hansen, E.M.; Hayes, J.L. Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: Direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 2010, 60, 602–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, X.P.; Wang, X.W.; Li, T.; Li, Q.; Li, F. Advance in researches on Dendroctonus armandi. Sichuan For. Sci. Technol. 2008, 29, 56–58. [Google Scholar]
  41. Régnière, J.; Powell, J.; Bentz, B.; Nealis, V. Effects of temperature on development, survival and reproduction of insects: Experimental design, data analysis and modeling. J. Insect. Physiol. 2012, 58, 634–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, J.; Zhang, R.R.; Gao, G.Q.; Ma, M.Y.; Chen, H. Cold tolerance and silencing of three cold-tolerance genes of overwintering Chinese white pine larvae. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, J.; Gao, G.Q.; Zhang, R.R.; Dai, L.L.; Chen, H. Metabolism and cold tolerance of Chinese white pine beetle Dendroctonus armandi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) during the overwintering period. Agric. For. Entomol. 2017, 19, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ning, H.; Dai, L.L.; Fu, D.Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, H.L.; Chen, H. Factors influencing the geographical distribution of Dendroctonus armandi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytidae) in China. Forests 2019, 10, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Logan, J.A.; Bentz, B.J. Model analysis of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) seasonality. Environ. Entomol. 1999, 28, 924–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Jaworski, T.; Hilszczański, J. The effect of temperature and humidity changes on insect development their impact on forest ecosystems in the expected climate change. For. Res. Pap. 2013, 74, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ungerer, M.J.; Ayres, M.P.; Lombardero, M.J. Climate and the northern distribution limits of Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Biogeogr. 1999, 26, 1133–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Carroll, A.L.; Taylor, S.W.; Régnière, J.; Safranyik, L. Effect of climate change on range expansion by the mountain pine beetle in British Columbia. In Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions, Information Report BC-X.-399; Natural Resources Canada: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2003; p. 298. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mendoza, M.G.; Salinas-Moreno, Y.; Olivo-Martínez, A.; Zúñiga, G. Factors influencing the geographical distribution of Dendroctonus rhizophagus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico. Environ. Entomol. 2011, 40, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Aitken, S.N.; Yeaman, S.; Holliday, J.A.; Wang, T.L.; McLane, S.C. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: Climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evol. Appl. 2008, 1, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zheng, X.; Gao, P.; Zhang, S.X. The distribution shifts of Pinus armandii and its response to temperature and precipitation in China. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lin, L.; He, J.; Xie, L.; Cui, G.F. Prediction of the suitable area of the Chinese white pines (Pinus subsect. Strobus) under climate changes and implications for their conservation. Forests 2020, 11, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yu, F.; Wang, D.X.; Yi, X.F.; Shi, X.X.; Huang, Y.K.; Zhang, H.W.; Zhang, X.P. Does animal-mediated seed dispersal facilitate the formation of Pinus armandii-Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forests? PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Forrest, J.R. Complex responses of insect phenology to climate change. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2016, 17, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Burkett, V.R.; Wilcox, D.A.; Stottlemyer, R.; Barrowa, W.; Fagre, D. Nonlinear dynamics in ecosystem response to climatic change: Case studies and policy implications. Ecol. Complex. 2005, 2, 357–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Bentz, B.J.; Jönsson, A.M. Modeling bark beetle responses to climate change. In Bark Beetles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 533–553. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sømme, L. Effect of glycerol on cold-hardiness in insect. Can. J. Zool. 1964, 42, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Saunders, D.S. Insect photoperiodism: Effects of temperature on the induction of insect diapause and diverse roles for the circadian system in the photoperiodic response. Entomol. Sci. 2014, 17, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Davis, C.C.; Willis, C.G.; Primack, R.B.; Miller-Rushing, A.J. The importance of phylogeny to the study of phenological response to global climate change. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365, 3201–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wisz, M.S.; Hijmans, R.J.; Li, J.; Peterson, A.T.; Graham, C.H.; Guisan, A. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 2008, 14, 763–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Anderson, R.P.; Dudík, M.; Ferrier, S.; Guisan, A. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Marmion, M.; Parviainen, M.; Luoto, M.; Heikkinen, R.K.; Thuiller, W. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Araujo, M.; New, M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Forests 12 00544 g001 550
Figure 1. Occurrence records of Dendroctonus armandi and current distribution of Pinus armandii in China.
Figure 1. Occurrence records of Dendroctonus armandi and current distribution of Pinus armandii in China.
Forests 12 00544 g001
Forests 12 00544 g002a 550Forests 12 00544 g002b 550
Figure 2. Quantitative relationship between environmental variables and habitat suitability to Dendroctonus armandi. (a) Bio1: Annual mean temperature (°C); (b) Bio6: Minimum temperature of coldest month (°C); (c) Bio9: Mean temperature of driest quarter (°C); (d) Bio15: Precipitation seasonality (Coefficient of variation) (%); (e) Bio17: Precipitation of driest quarter (mm).
Figure 2. Quantitative relationship between environmental variables and habitat suitability to Dendroctonus armandi. (a) Bio1: Annual mean temperature (°C); (b) Bio6: Minimum temperature of coldest month (°C); (c) Bio9: Mean temperature of driest quarter (°C); (d) Bio15: Precipitation seasonality (Coefficient of variation) (%); (e) Bio17: Precipitation of driest quarter (mm).
Forests 12 00544 g002aForests 12 00544 g002b
Forests 12 00544 g003 550
Figure 3. Current distribution of suitable habitat for Dendroctonus armandi in China.
Figure 3. Current distribution of suitable habitat for Dendroctonus armandi in China.
Forests 12 00544 g003
Forests 12 00544 g004 550
Figure 4. Future distribution of suitable habitat for Dendroctonus armandi in China. The 2030s represents 2021–2040, and 2050s represents 2041–2060. ((a,b), future distribution of suitable habitat under RCP2.6 in 2030s and 2050s, respectively; (c,d), future distribution of suitable habitat under RCP4.5 in 2030s and 2050s, respectively; (e,f), future distribution of suitable habitat under RCP8.5 in 2030s and 2050s, respectively).
Figure 4. Future distribution of suitable habitat for Dendroctonus armandi in China. The 2030s represents 2021–2040, and 2050s represents 2041–2060. ((a,b), future distribution of suitable habitat under RCP2.6 in 2030s and 2050s, respectively; (c,d), future distribution of suitable habitat under RCP4.5 in 2030s and 2050s, respectively; (e,f), future distribution of suitable habitat under RCP8.5 in 2030s and 2050s, respectively).
Forests 12 00544 g004
Forests 12 00544 g005 550
Figure 5. Predicted areas of different habitat suitability classes for Dendroctonus armandi.
Figure 5. Predicted areas of different habitat suitability classes for Dendroctonus armandi.
Forests 12 00544 g005
Table
Table 1. Description of environmental variables used for modeling the habitat suitability distribution of Dendroctonus armandi in this study.
Table 1. Description of environmental variables used for modeling the habitat suitability distribution of Dendroctonus armandi in this study.
Data SourceCategoryEnvironmental Variables (Unit)Abbreviation
WorldClimBioclimaticAnnual mean temperature (°C)Bio1
Mean diurnal range (Mean of monthly (max temp-min temp)) (°C)Bio2
Isothermality (Bio2/Bio7) (%)Bio3
Temperature seasonality (Standard deviation × 100) (°C)Bio4
Maximum temperature of warmest month (°C)Bio5
Minimum temperature of coldest month (°C)Bio6
Temperature annual range (Bio5-Bio6) (°C)Bio7
Mean temperature of wettest quarter (°C)Bio8
Mean temperature of driest quarter (°C)Bio9
Mean temperature of warmest quarter (°C)Bio10
Mean temperature of coldest quarter (°C)Bio11
Annual precipitation (mm)Bio12
Precipitation of wettest month (mm)Bio13
Precipitation of driest month (mm)Bio14
Precipitation seasonality (Coefficient of variation) (%)Bio15
Precipitation of wettest quarter (mm)Bio16
Precipitation of driest quarter (mm)Bio17
Precipitation of warmest quarter (mm)Bio18
Precipitation of coldest quarter (mm)Bio19
TerrainAltitude (m)Alt.
USGSAspect (degree)Asp.
Slope (degree)Slop.
GBIF, CVH, Field investigationsHostPinus armandii distribution H
Note: USGS—United States Geological Survey; CVH—Chinese Virtual Herbarium; GBIF—Global Biodiversity Information Facility.
Table
Table 2. Ranking of the importance of environmental variables for predicting the distribution of Dendroctonus armandi.
Table 2. Ranking of the importance of environmental variables for predicting the distribution of Dendroctonus armandi.
RankEnvironmental VariablesRegression Coefficients in LASSOContribution (%)Probability of Selection *
1Minimum temperature of coldest month (Bio6)1.483229.91.00
2Precipitation seasonality (Bio15)−0.896519.30.98
3Mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio9)0.786516.80.96
4Annual mean temperature (Bio1)−0.461411.40.93
5Precipitation of driest quarter (Bio17)−0.24889.80.92
* Cross-validation analysis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ning, H.; Tang, M.; Chen, H. Impact of Climate Change on Potential Distribution of Chinese White Pine Beetle Dendroctonus armandi in China. Forests 2021, 12, 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12050544

AMA Style

Ning H, Tang M, Chen H. Impact of Climate Change on Potential Distribution of Chinese White Pine Beetle Dendroctonus armandi in China. Forests. 2021; 12(5):544. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12050544

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ning, Hang, Ming Tang, and Hui Chen. 2021. "Impact of Climate Change on Potential Distribution of Chinese White Pine Beetle Dendroctonus armandi in China" Forests 12, no. 5: 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12050544

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop