1. Introduction
Green plants and soil layers can be used to store carbon dioxide in terrestrial ecosystems, which can be effectively reduced in the atmosphere [
1,
2]. In the midst of rapid urbanization and industrialization, land-use changes have also occurred dramatically [
3]. Urban expansion, which mainly encroaches on ecological land, leads to changes in the large amount of ecological land that can provide carbon storage. Urban expansion is not only provided with ecological service functions but also has high density of carbon storage, thereby, causing the reduction of CS [
4].
Carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems has been significantly reduced [
5] because of the influence of rapid urban sprawl, which affects the health of the carbon cycle and the further development of urban sustainability. Therefore, studying the interrelationship between urban sprawl and CS not only contributes to discovering the changes of CS in ecosystems but also has important implications for ecosystem conservation, environmental sustainability and the global greenhouse climate.
Ecosystem services are significant for maintaining the stability and healthy development of ecological environment, the economy, and society [
6,
7]. In recent years, the sustainable development of urban ecosystems is gradually becoming a guarantee for maintaining urban ecological security [
8] and improving the health of ecosystems [
9,
10].
The Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model [
11] assesses CS, using CS modules and carbon density data, which simplifies a complex process and makes it more efficient [
12]. In recent years, InVEST has been applied to CS assessment in many fields. The variability of carbon storage in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration [
13] has been assessed in two dimensions with the help of the InVEST model. There are also studies on the economic valuation of CS in the Konar Basin in India [
14] and on the relationship between ecosystems and carbon storage changes at both the national and provincial levels [
15].
However, most studies stay at the national and provincial levels of carbon storage [
16,
17], and spatial changes to the county-level CS have not been studied in depth, particularly for the developing needs of different townships [
18]. To the end, the CS module of the InVEST model was, thereby, chosen to explore the dynamic variations of CS. Policymakers can select the optimal model for integrated urban–rural development, formulate ecological conservation policies, and protect rural cropland by considering the demands of various townships. The reduction of cropland may cause a food crisis, food security issues, and an increase in food miles, which will, in turn, cause an increase in carbon emissions.
Setting up different scenarios based on different urban construction policies is a more scientific method to explore the future impact of LULC changes on CS, which can provide useful information for future urban planning [
19]. Additionally, there are studies with combined land-use simulation models with the assessment of carbon storage, thus, offering the possibility of combining multiple models [
20]. Many simulation models, such as the Cellular Automata (CA) model and the Markov and Flus model, have been used to investigate the relationship between LULC change and CS [
21,
22,
23].
However, these models are subject to the drawbacks of failing to reveal the underlying indicates driving land-use change or easily capture the spatio-temporal evolution of various land-use patches [
20]. The patch-generating land-use simulation (PLUS) model [
24] is divided into three main panels, of which, the Land Expansion Analysis Strategy (LEAS) panel reveals the expansion potential of each type of land use; and the CA model is based on multi-type random patch seeds (CARS) [
25].
The panel allows the addition of different policy constraints to simulate land-use expansion in different future scenarios, and studies the relationship between urban expansion and the impact of CS [
26]. Second, in the carbon sink services of ecosystems, their economic value has been recognized and applied by the global market economy system [
27]; however, the impact of CS changes on socio-economic values has been rarely studied. Therefore, this study examines the changes in carbon storage and the estimation of the CS economic value under different scenarios at the regional level of development.
The global climate is increasingly worsening, and climate change is affecting the natural environment where humans live. Controlling carbon dioxide emissions has become a major global challenge, and a series of guidelines and targets have been set by countries around the world to address climate issues. The urbanization of China is growing rapidly [
28,
29], and in 2021, the National People’s Congress proposed to include “carbon peaking” and “carbon neutrality” in the government report. Therefore, balancing the urbanization development rate and carbon dioxide emissions becomes an essential issue for healthy regional development [
26].
Foshan is in a subtropical climate zone and suffers from a severe greenhouse climate with high summer temperatures. In addition, the city is also undergoing rapid urbanization, making it a typical city in China to study carbon emissions. Considering the rapid urban sprawl, land use in Foshan is being exposed to dramatic changes. The CS of the ecosystem services is significantly decreasing.
To this end, herein, two models, PLUS and InVEST, were combined to examine the changes in CS at the urban and rural scales and explore balancing carbon emissions with human survival and achieving sustainable management of urban and rural ecosystems are the goals of the future regional development of Foshan City, a “low-carbon city” and “resource-saving and environment-friendly” pilot city in China. In the face of climate risks, such as high temperatures and heat, only by actively building a climate-resilient society can urban problems and damage be mitigated.
Herein, Foshan City was selected as a typical area for the assessment of CS, and three different development scenarios explore the LULC changes and CS in conjunction with more appropriate local urban planning and land policies. The study aims to (1) identify land-use changes and analyze the potential relationships between land use and CS from 2010 to 2020; (2) predict the future changes of CS and its economic value with three different scenarios; and (3) analyze the urban–rural relationship and spatial variability of CS, and select appropriate urban land-use scenarios. The research results can allow government departments and planners to obtain helpful suggestions and solutions for improving sustainable urbanization in their areas.
3. Results
3.1. Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Urban Expansion
Significant changes in the land use of Foshan resulted from the urban expansion between 2010 and 2020. Urban construction land expanded, going from 103,637.16 ha in 2010 to 124,034.94 ha in 2015. Urban construction land in Foshan City is mainly concentrated in the central urban district of Chancheng District and has a tendency to expand from the center to the periphery while continuing to grow.
During the decade, a total of 20,397.78 ha of construction land was granted for other land-use types. Urban expansion mainly took over cropland, forest land, and water. With an urban expansion area of about 68.84% of the 10-year urban expansion (2010–2020), the fastest phase of construction land urbanization took place between 2010 and 2015, and the cropland and water land of 6355.62 ha made up the majority of the urban construction land flow from 2015 to 2020.
According to the land-use policy for setting different constraints, three different simulation scenarios were set up using the PLUS model. Under the BS scenario, all types of land present a natural development state. By 2035, both cropland and forest land will have decreased to 113,335.92 and 80,308.17 ha, respectively, while grassland will have increased. In contrast to the other two scenarios, the EP scenario has the smallest urban expansion (130,959.99 ha), which occupies less forest and cropland. Additionally, the CP scenario indicates the largest urban expansion area (133,437.24 ha), occupying forest land but maintaining cropland and grassland (
Table 4 and
Figure 5).
In terms of spatial distribution, the urban expansion in Foshan will spread to the countryside areas in 2035. However, compared with the other two scenarios, the BS scenarios show that the construction land use will extend more to rural land and ecological land use. The CP scenario has the least urban expansion and mainly encroaches on grassland. This scenario strictly controls the amount of retained cropland and also protects forest land. The EP scenario has limited urban construction land expansion as forest land is strictly protected.
The results reveal a continuous growth of urban construction land under different scenarios. According to the three scenario simulations, construction land will further expand in 2035, which will mainly erode ecological land. However, the encroachment of construction land can be effectively controlled using the basic cropland control and ecological protection policy of government travel (
Figure 6).
3.2. Carbon Storage Dynamics in Terrestrial Ecosystems
The carbon storage in Foshan City has changed drastically as a result of its rapid outward expansion. In 2010, 2015, and 2020, the total terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage was 26.53 × 10
6, 30.20 × 10
6 and 29.65 × 10
6 t, and the average CS density was 69.88, 79.55 and 78.10 t/ha, respectively. The overall trend of terrestrial ecosystem CS in Foshan City increased from 2010 to 2015. However, it was statistically derived that the carbon storage declined rapidly during the period of 2015–2020. According to the projected 2035, the BS scenario carbon storage decline rate will continue with the decline rate of 2015–2020; while the EP scenario will decline slower than that under the BS scenario; and the CP scenario will decline slower than that under the EP scenario, presenting a carbon storage decline rate c CP > BS > EP (
Figure 7).
From 2010 to 2015, CS showed an increasing trend due to the conversion of most of the waters of Foshan into agricultural land for pond fields, mainly concentrated in Shunde District, Foshan City. The area of carbon loss was expanding quickly as a result of construction land encroaching on cropland and forest land from 2015 to 2020, which led to the decline of carbon storage at the fastest rate in the previous 5 years. By directly occupying cropland and forest land, the urban extension of Foshan City has resulted in the ecosystem carbon storage of 403,493.16 and 570,741.21 t.
By 2035, it is estimated that the CS in Foshan City will have further decreased with more than 75% of the city’s total carbon sink coming from cropland and forest land—two types of Foshan’s most significant carbon pools. Cropland among them sequestered the most carbon in 2015, which was 13.21 × 10
6 t, or 44% of the total carbon sequestered in 2015. According to 2035 simulations and projections, CS will continue to decline; however, the decline rate can be slowed by policy protection (
Table 5).
Under all these three scenarios, the CS capacity of terrestrial ecosystems shows a decreasing trend in 2020–2035. The CS capacity of ecosystem is expected to reach 28.97 × 10
6 (BS), 29.05 × 10
6 (EP), and 28.66 × 10
6 t (CP) in the three scenarios. The CS will decrease by 0.67 × 10
6 (BS), 0.60 × 10
6 (EP), and 0.99 × 10
6 t (CP), with decreases of 2.28%, 2.02%, and 3.33%, respectively, compared to 2020. In 2035, the CS sink capacity of Foshan ecosystem will decrease under the different scenarios (
Table 6).
Comparing the other two scenarios, the EP scenario has the highest average carbon density of 76.72 t/ha, proving the efficiency of the forest land conservation in this scenario in maintaining carbon storage. Additionally, the lower CS density is 75.69 t/ha for CP, which has a weaker carbon sequestration capacity. Conservation of ecological land can effectively maintain CS, and the primary cause of carbon loss is urban expansion. Under the three scenarios, the CS loss brought by the loss of cropland is 874,914.42 (BS), 874,914.42 (EP), and 47,616.96 t (CP), 1.29, 1.45, and 0.05 times the total CS loss (
Figure 8).
3.3. Spatial Variability of CS and Economic Losses
The InVEST model was used to assess the economic value changes on ecosystem CS in Foshan City, and the carbon loss was implemented at the township level. From 2010 to 2020, the highest carbon losses were concentrated in Southwest Street in Sanshui District and Nanshan Town in Sanshui District, with losses of 122,422.57 and 51,144.6 t, respectively. In contrast, the CP scenario retained the largest amount of farmland, and the reduction of carbon storage was concentrated in Genghe Town and Mingcheng Town of Gaoming District, with losses of 213,442.69 and 102,017.29 t.
Under the EP scenario, some of the cropland in northern Foshan would be further transformed into forest land, generating CS sinks. Additionally, the reduction of carbon storage was concentrated in Xiqiao Town and Shishan Town of Nanhai District, with losses of 44,809.05 and 42,420.17 t. The most serious loss of CS in the ecosystem of Foshan was in Sanshui District, followed by Shunde District and Gaoming District, where the economic development and urban expansion were obvious (
Figure 9).
This was a critical period for the development and transformation of urbanization in Foshan, with its population, social, economic and cultural level, and market circulation increasing. However, the urban–rural conflict was further intensified [
8]. The carbon value valuation module of the InVEST model was, thereby, used to calculate the economic losses brought on by the loss of CS. According to the findings, carbon sequestration totaled 28,757,080 USD between 2010 and 2020, with a loss of 4,889,513 USD between 2015 and 2020. Under the three simulated scenarios, the predicted value of carbon storage will be reduced by 5,447,538 (BS), 4,799,589 (EP), and 8,293,614 (CP) USD over the course of the next 15 years.
In the regional distribution, the highest loss of carbon storage value during 2010–2020 was in Southwest Street and Nanshan Town of Sanshui District, with a loss value of 1,116,220 and 466,324 USD, respectively; the highest economic value of carbon sequestration was in Xingtan Town of Shunde District of Foshan City, with a loss value of 7,185,766 USD. Under the BS and EP scenarios, the highest economic value of CS loss is in Shishan Town, Southern District, with losses valued at about 633,825 and 409,372 USD, respectively. In the CP scenario, the economic value of CS loss was as high as 1,936,458 USD in Genghe Town, Gaoming District (
Figure 10).
4. Discussion
4.1. Impact of Urban Expansion on CS
The land amount used for construction continues increasing, encroaching on cropland, forest land, and water, thus, reducing the CS amount. The construction land growth of Foshan City has severely encroached on rural cropland and water, with Chancheng District as its central urban area, and Shunde District occupying the highest proportion of encroachment on ponds and paddy fields. In Foshan City, the period from 2010 to 2020 witnessed both the fastest rates of urban sprawl and the fastest rates of decline in the amount of carbon sequestered by the terrestrial ecosystem.
From 2010 to 2015, Foshan City expanded its construction land area by 14,042.16 ha, resulting in a decrease of 10,226.27 t in CS of cropland and 385,956.88 t in CS of ecological land. From 2010 to 2020, the area of urban construction land increased by 6355.62 ha, resulting in a decrease of 2,959,201.39 t in CS of cropland and a loss of 482,026.03 t in CS of ecological land (
Table 7). Urbanization has a gradually increasing and decreasing effect on the carbon-storage ability of Foshan. The expansion of urban construction land has, however, slowed down when compared to the previous phase, which is closely related to a series of ecological protection policies in Foshan.
Foshan introduced the “Foshan City Work Plan for Building a High-Quality Forest City in the Greater Bay Area (2018–2022)” and the “Special Plan for the Construction of Natural Ecological Civilization in Foshan City” since receiving the designation of “National Forest City” in 2017. It is actively engaged in ecological protection and seeks to develop a sustainable urban environment. A new ecological pattern of blue-green integration has been built, creating a high-quality urban and rural space. This pattern has been achieved in three ways, i.e., forestation on the mountain, forests in the city, and greening at the seams.
Recently, several studies have attempted to analyze the changes of carbon storage under different urban development scenarios through the urban expansion model [
43,
44,
45]. For example, Jiang and Deng (2017) [
46] analyzed the potential impacts of urban expansion on carbon storage through the Conversion of Land Use and its Effects modeling framework (CLUE-S) model and the Integrated Valuation of Environmental Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model, and the results indicated that carbon storage has experienced varying degrees of loss due to urban expansion.
Externally, the change of CS in the region is affected by the expansion of urban construction land, while internally, it is influenced by the urban policies and plans implemented by the government, making it necessarily important to study the spatial and temporal patterns of urban expansion under different policies. To this end, this research predicted three different scenarios, including the BS scenario, CP scenario, and EP scenario.
According to the simulation results, under the BS scenario, the average annual CS loss caused by construction land enlargement in 2020–2035 is projected to be 0.41-times higher than that in 2015–2020. The EP scenario shows that protecting ecological lands can mitigate the reduction of CS and that the loss of CS caused by ecological land occupied by urban sprawl is the lowest. In contrast to the CP scenario, there is less loss of CS caused by the urban enlargement in the development of the EP scenario, compared to the overall loss of CS, which is relatively mild. This indicates that ecological protection policies mitigate and limit urban expansion and reduce carbon losses and are, thus, beneficial to mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and global warming.
4.2. Value Loss and Spatial Heterogeneity on CS
Overall, there are essential regional differences in the endowment of ecological land resources, economic levels, and urban expansion in different regions of Foshan City, which are primarily attributed to regional differences in the ecological land resource endowment, economic levels, and urban expansion [
47].
According to the present findings, the type of land most susceptible to the encroachment of urban growth is rural production, ecological, and living land, which will exacerbate the already severe urban–rural fragmentation. Although urban construction land expansion will inevitably encroach on forest land and cropland that can be used for carbon sequestration in rural towns, rural towns still have an advantage over urban construction land in terms of spatial distribution. The urban growth in Foshan primarily encroaches on rural cropland, although it also significantly affects forest land. The conversion of ecological land with higher carbon density into urban construction land with lower carbon density leads to the reduction and loss of ecosystem CS [
16].
In this case, China launched a program to turn cropland back into forests starting in 1999 [
41], and the national policy has contributed considerably in certain ways to the restraint and management. With the proposal of the carbon neutrality goal of China [
2], the future development of government policy and planning implementations of China are inevitable for ecological protection and climate environment preservation.
We suggest promoting large-scale greening of the national territory, biodiversity conservation, system management, further optimization of the spatial pattern of carbon sinks, implementation of green carbon sink ecological restoration and synergistic efficiency using nature-based solutions, and enhancing the carbon sequestration capacity of ecosystems. Other rapidly urbanizing cities can draw inspiration from Foshan City to formulate corresponding ecological protection policies, deepen greening construction at multiple levels, diversify, and rely on the proposed “forest city”, “ecological city”, and “park city” plans of China. For instance, “park cities” were proposed to improve the quality of ecological space, promote the efficiency of carbon sequestration, and reduce the loss of the CS value.
4.3. Limitations and Future Directions
Herein, the land use and carbon sink data of Foshan City are substituted into the CS module of the INVEST model to study the CS changes in Foshan City. However, given that carbon storage is usually affected by environmental hydrothermal factors, anthropogenic factors, plant species, and patch size and that many land-use types in the research region are currently changing, these changes will also lead to a gradual increase in CS. Therefore, the data from the model may be inaccurate to an extent.
The future construction of land-use space was also simulated using the PLUS model. Undoubtedly, the three future land-use scenarios described in this model fail to cover all land-use conditions. Hence, the use of the model in the future scenarios needs to be close to the reality and to focus on the relationship between natural and social environment systems in the research region so that the data can better match the actual situation. In addition, the purpose of using this model is to better reveal the trending patterns rather than the data evaluation.