Next Article in Journal
Modeling the Effect of Stand Characteristics on Oak Volume Increment in Poland Using Generalized Additive Models
Next Article in Special Issue
Impacts of Different Reforestation Methods on Fungal Community and Nutrient Content in an Ex-Tea Plantation
Previous Article in Journal
Green in the City: Estimating the Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban and Peri-Urban Forests of Tbilisi Municipality, Georgia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changing Spring Phenology of Northeast China Forests during Rapid Warming and Short-Term Slowdown Periods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extending the Behavioral Geography within the Context of Forest Restoration: Research on the Geographical Behaviors of Northern-Migrating Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) in Southwest China

1
College of Geographical Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
2
School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
3
School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
4
Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(1), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010122
Submission received: 19 November 2022 / Revised: 6 January 2023 / Accepted: 8 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Detection and Mitigation of Forest Degradation and Fragmentation)

Abstract

:
In 2021, the northward migration of Asian elephants in southwestern China’s Yunnan Province attracted significant public attention. Exploring the behavior of Asian elephants will help to better protect this endangered species and further realize the harmonious coexistence of humans and elephants. Based on the news texts regarding the northward migration of Asian elephants, this study used network text analysis, social network analysis, and grounded theoretical research methods to explore the behavioral characteristics and internal motivations of Asian elephants during their northward migration. The results indicate that: (1) during the northward migration of Asian elephants, moving and foraging are their most frequent behaviors, and foraging may be the chief purpose of the migration. (2) Different behaviors of Asian elephants hide their behavioral choice preferences, including environmental, time, and behavioral preferences. During the migration, Asian elephants mostly move in low-altitude areas, often foraging or migrating around farmland in the afternoon or at night, returning to the mountains to rest in the early morning. Corn, rice, and other crops are their primary food; the change in their eating habits is influenced by the lack of herbs and woody plants inside the protected area. (3) The northward migration behavior of elephant herds is influenced by various factors, such as elephant population expansion, habitat change, and species migration characteristics, and the relationship between conservation and development needs to be balanced.

1. Introduction

As an integral part of the many terrestrial ecosystems, forests play an important role in maintaining biodiversity. As one of the world’s leading economies, balancing economic development and environmental protection has become an urgent issue for China to address. However, China’s rapid economic development in recent years has been accompanied by deforestation. Forest fragmentation has led to an inevitable squeeze on wildlife habitats, resulting in frequent incidents of wild animals leaving traditional habitats to enter the human activity space, conflicting with humans throughout China [1]. Strengthening the protection of forest resources is an important condition to ensure the development of forest resources. At the same time, to protect forest resources, rational development and utilization can effectively improve the use efficiency of forest resources and promote economic growth. How to balance forest conservation and development has received great attention in academia. However, little attention has been paid to the impact of forest conservation and development on wildlife behavior. As a core area of reproduction and growth, forests are essential for the survival of wildlife. Recently, a highly destructive, long-lasting, and wide-ranging wildlife incident occurred in China, arousing widespread concern worldwide [2,3]. On 16 April 2021, 16 wild Asian elephants from the Mengyang Nature Reserve in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China, left their traditional habitat to migrate more than 1300 km northwards, which took more than 500 days, and they passed through eight counties (cities, districts) in Yuxi, Honghe, and Kunming. The northern migration of Asian elephants has been one of China’s most destructive wildlife incidents in recent years. Most scholars believe it results from a combination of forest overprotection and habitat destruction. Therefore, it is worthwhile to pay attention to these problems and explore the hidden scientific issues behind forest conservation and wildlife behavior to provide references on striking a balance between forest conservation and wildlife protection.
The Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), the protagonist of the aforementioned northward migration, belongs to the order Proboscidea, the largest and most representative terrestrial vertebrate in Asia; is a key protected animal in China; and is listed as an endangered species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Recently, China has adhered to the development concept of prioritizing conservation and has continued to increase its efforts to protect Asian elephants and their habitats. With the joint efforts of the relevant departments of the Chinese government, the conservation of wild Asian elephant populations in China has achieved remarkable results. Compared to the past 30 years, the number of wild Asian elephants has increased from approximately 150 to 300. In addition, as the Chinese government and relevant departments have focused on ecological and environmental protection, the forest coverage of the traditional habitat of Asian elephants has also been increasing each year. However, the increase in forest coverage also means that the understory shrubs and herbs have been decreasing, leading to a shortage of food sources and a decrease in suitable habitats for the elephants. Because of the mutual contradiction between the increasing elephant population and decreasing habitat, wild Asian elephants frequently enter human activity areas due to foraging, leading to frequent human–elephant conflict (HEC). Forest conservation has led to reduced and fragmented elephant habitats, creating the problem of how to protect elephants and mitigate HEC. HEC not only causes substantial economic losses but also affects and threatens the daily activities and safety of local residents, intensifying their resentment toward Asian elephants [4].
Under the background of habitat fragmentation of Asian elephants caused by excessive forest protection, how to respect the survival behavior of wild animals and mitigate the conflict between humans and elephants has become a popular issue of widespread concern in academia, the government, and the public. In recent years, many studies have evaluated the habitat suitability of Asian elephants. Habitat destruction has been found to affect the survival and reproduction of Asian elephants more than other species with smaller home ranges because elephants require large areas of habitat to meet their ecological requirements [5]. Most scholars believe that the area and distribution range of suitable habitats for Asian elephants in China are shrinking, and many elephants are in danger due to insufficient habitats [6,7,8]. HEC occurs when the habitat needs of Asian elephants and human needs intersect. HEC are is generally common in protected areas with a high human demand for natural resources [9,10,11,12]. The key types of HEC include crop damage, property destruction, and human and elephant casualties [13,14,15]. For example, Asian elephants feed on farmland due to food shortage, and pesticides on crops will harm the health of Asian elephants. In addition, farmers may hunt Asian elephants for revenge. An evaluation of the patterns and distribution of HEC can help to better understand the causes and provide reference for mitigating these conflicts. Although, there are differences in the mode and distribution of HEC in different regions, generally, altitude, topography, land-use type, population density, and distance from the protected areas are the main factors that affect the pattern and distribution of HEC [16,17,18]. HEC seriously affect human life and livelihoods, and understanding people’s attitudes toward these conflicts is crucial when designing long-term effective management policies for Asian elephants. Scholars generally agree that education, culture, wealth level, and the intensity of loss affect the local population’s perceptions and attitudes toward HEC to varying degrees [19,20,21,22,23,24].
When forests are destroyed, the animals and plants present are affected to varying degrees [25]. From the perspective of behavioral geography, this paper explores the behavior of Asian elephants during their northward migration and their relationship with the geographical environment [26]. Traditional behavioral geography is based on human beings as the basic object of study, which is inextricably linked to the long-standing prevalent anthropocentrism. Traditional anthropocentrism believes that nature and all things exist to serve and be used by human beings and that in the relationship between human beings and nature, everything must start and end with the interests of human beings. This view once influenced social practices and academic orientation. However, as environmental problems become increasingly serious, some scholars have begun to rethink the relationship between humans and non-humans, proposing new ethical concepts, such as “De-anthropocentrism” and “More-than-human” [27,28,29,30]. Under the new ethical orientation, behavioral geography should no longer be confined to humans, and its attention on non-human actors should be strengthened. Under the current background of increasingly intensified “human–animal conflicts,” behavioral geography research on wild animals is attracting increasing attention. Therefore, this study applied an expanding behavioral geography framework (Figure 1) to analyze the northward migration behavior of Asian elephants. Based on identifying Asian elephants as behavioral actors, this study focuses on summarizing the behavioral types, behavioral preferences and their relationship with the environment, behavioral consequences, and behavioral causes and further explores the inner mechanism of the northward migration behavior of Asian elephants. This study attempted to answer the following questions: What are the factors that drove the migration? What are the behaviors of Asian elephants during their northward migration? What are the behavior choice preferences of Asian elephants during their northward migration?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

After the Asian elephants migrated north, to grasp the activity route and behavior of elephant’s migration in real time, the relevant departments organized a monitoring team to monitor the elephant herd 24 h a day. The mainstream media have set up news features to continuously report the path and behavior of elephant migration. Therefore, the data in this study were obtained from the texts about the northern migration behavior of Asian elephants from well-known official news websites, such as CCTV.com, People’s Daily Online, and Yunnan.com, and the following conditions were set for screening: (1) to ensure the timeliness of the data, the relevant news texts used were from 25 March 2021, to 16 August 2021, for a total of 145 days. (2) To ensure the quality of the research data, irrelevant and repetitive contents were eliminated, and relevant texts that included the behavioral trajectories and behavioral characteristics of the Asian elephants in the process of their northward migration, as well as the cause analysis and solution countermeasures, were extracted. A total of 234 news texts were selected based on this standard, which were sorted and edited into .txt documents and used as the basis for studying the northward migration of Asian elephants.
The subject of this study is the Asian elephant herd originally inhabiting the Meng Yang Reserve in the Xishuangbanna National Nature Reserve. The Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve has five sub-reserves where tropical and monsoon rainforests coexist. Thirty-one species of plants and 104 species of wild animals are protected inside by the state government. The reserve is rich in biodiversity and is one of the main habitats of Asian elephants [31]. However, the current distribution of tropical rainforests or tropical monsoon forests in protected areas is fragmented and can no longer support survival, reproduction, and development in Asia [32].

2.2. Methods

To conduct behavioral research on the Asian elephants moving north, the grounded theory was used to conduct the exploratory analysis of the relevant news texts. The grounded theory is a qualitative research method proposed by Glaser and Strauss in 1967, which aims to help researchers form and validate theories from original data [33]. As a research method, the grounded theory can extract meaningful categories from the original data through three processes: open coding, spindle coding, and selective coding.
(1) Open coding: the first step of the rooted theory approach is open-ended coding, in which meaning units are used as the coding units, and concepts and meanings that are similar are coded into a subcategory to operationalize the process of discovering the conceptual classes and categories from the information [34]. While coding the news texts about the migration, we repeatedly read and broke down the collected primary sources to discover the initial concepts word-by-word with an open attitude and condensed them into more generalized initial categories by comparing them with each other. Following the operational logic of open coding, 137 original statements with high relevance to the northward migration behavior of the Asian elephants were finally extracted, and 70 initial concepts and 27 initial categories were abstracted after the comparison and generalization of the statements (Table 1).
(2) Spindle coding: the purpose of spindle coding is to discover and establish the connection between the concept category and the category and to identify the primary category from the initial category to represent the various relationships between the parts of the data. In this study, we refined the initial categories based on open coding, analyzed the interrelationships among the initial categories, and integrated the categories with a higher level of abstraction. Eventually, the 27 initial categories formed by open coding were distilled into 11 main categories (Table 2).
(3) Selective coding: selective coding aims to distill the core categories based on the main categories, relate them systematically to other categories, and analyze the relationships between the core categories, major categories, and other categories. In this study, through the continuous generalization, extraction, integration, and abstraction of 70 initial concepts, 27 initial categories, and 11 main categories, the logical structure between the concepts and categories was constructed, and three core categories were refined: the behavioral characteristics of the Asian elephants migrating northward, the causes of the migration, and the response measures (Table 3).
In this study, we conducted content analysis with the help of ROST Content Mining 6.0 software to extract high-frequency keywords and the co-occurrence matrix of keywords (Table 4) regarding Asian elephant behaviors during their northward migration. And the keywords with the same meaning were grouped together to obtain the high-frequency keywords (Table 5).
In social network analysis, degree centrality is used to express the importance of nodes in the network [35]. This study uses point degree centrality and UCINET 6.0 software to analyze the importance of keywords in the semantic network during the northward migration of Asian elephants. Degree centrality measures the degree to which a node in a network is connected to other nodes. The calculation method of degree centrality is as follows [35]:
D e g r e e i = j = 1 N x i j i j
where D e g r e e i is the degree centrality of node i ; i and j are the nodes in the social network, that is, the corresponding keywords; j = 1 N x i j is the co-occurrence count of node i and node j .

3. Results

3.1. Behavioral Types of Asian Elephants Moving Northward

The most frequent behaviors of Asian elephants during their northward migration were movement and foraging, which occurred 55 times and 24 times, respectively. The frequency of resting behavior was 13 times. Interestingly, Asian elephants were also observed to exhibit play and bathing behaviors on several occasions during their northern migration. The frequency of play and bathing behavior was 11 times (Table 6).

3.2. Behavioral Selection Preferences of Asian Elephants Migrating Northward

The co-occurrence matrix of keywords (Table 4) were imported into the UCINET 6.0 software to analyze the degree centrality of keywords (Table 7) and construct a keyword co-occurrence network (Figure 2). The points in the figure represent nodes, and the edges represent connections between nodes. The arrow represents the direction of the edge. The size of the nodes is proportional to the centrality of the point. The closer the words are to the central node core node, the stronger the connection with the central node words.
The different behaviors of Asian elephants indicate their behavioral choice preferences, including behavior preferences, time preferences, and environmental preferences. The key behavior of Asian elephants during their northward migration is foraging. According to the Table 7, the average degree centrality of Asian elephant migration behavior keywords is 9.280, and the degree centrality of 7 nodes is higher than the average. Foraging has the highest degree centrality of 40, which is the core keyword of Asian elephants’ northward migration. According to the Figure 2, Asian elephants often forage in villagers’ homes or woodlands during their northward migration. Asian elephants often rested on the top of the mountain or in the forest at noon, foraged, and moved in the afternoon or at night. The Asian elephants that moved north preferred corn, sugarcane, so corn field and villagers’ home warehouses were often their first choice of foraging grounds.

4. Discussion and Policy Implications

4.1. Discussion

According to the coding results (Table 3), it can be concluded that the northward migration of Asian elephants results from the protection of wild animals and forests, habitat changes, species-migration characteristics, and other factors driving Asian elephants to go out for food.
After leaving their traditional habitats, the behaviors of Asian elephants can be broadly sorted and summarized into four major types: foraging behaviors, movement behaviors, resting behaviors, and playing and bathing behaviors, which can be fundamentally summarized as survival behaviors. Movement and foraging occur most frequently and are the two types of behavior that have the greatest degree of impact on humans. Foraging is the primary purpose, movement is the process, and food shortage is the primary reason for the northward migration of Asian elephant herds, so to some extent, it can be said that foraging is the core behavior of Asian elephants in the process of northward migration, which is based on their basic survival needs. Related research also found elephants may spend anywhere between about 40% and 75% of their time in feeding [36]. All of their behaviors have a close relationship with the environment. During migration, to consume corn, sugarcane, and other agricultural foods, elephants frequently intrude into villages, farmland, and residential areas. Sukumar’s research also believes that in drier regions of Asia, the agricultural crops consumed by elephants are commonly corn and sugarcane [36]. The movement and migration of Asian elephants depend on the availability of natural food and water [36,37]. Therefore, elephants usually extend their foraging areas to the edges of farmland, where food and water resources are abundant [38], which leads to HEC. Asian elephants also play and bathe during their northern migration. Bathing, primarily in the form of rain showers, water baths, sand baths, mud baths, and grass baths, is one of the key ways they lower their body temperature [32]. Additionally, to help digest their food and replenish salt and inorganic substances, they often suck up inorganic nutrients in the nitrate ponds under the forest.
With the Chinese government’s increasing efforts to protect wildlife and forest resources and the improvement in public awareness of protection, the population of Asian elephants has been increasing. According to the Forestry and Grass Bureau of Yunnan Province, in the 1990s, the population of Asian elephants in Yunnan fell to approximately 150 and faced many problems, such as narrow and fragmented distribution areas, declining habitat quality, and reduced genetic diversity of the population. With increasing protection efforts, the development of the Asian elephant population has exhibited significant changes. Ac-cording to the Xishuangbanna National Nature Reserve Management Bureau, the number of wild Asian elephants has increased from approximately 150 to 300. In recent years, with the gradual improvement in the legal system and the strengthening of people’s awareness of protection, the Asian elephants’ fear of human beings has de-creased, and they have started to move around villages and farmland year-round, even near people, for food. Large herbivores such as elephants require extensive home range for food [39], so they require a large area of suitable habitat to meet their survival and reproduction needs. According to data from the Yunnan Provincial Online Press Office, Xishuangbanna’s forest coverage rate reached 81% in 2019. With the substantial increase in forest canopy density, the lack of light in the forest has caused some plants, such as plantains and loquat reeds, evolve into inedible woody plants. When the food quantity in the habitat does not match the expansion rate of the elephant population, it causes problems of intra-population competition and a lack of food. To solve this problem, Asian elephants must expand outward to find new habitats and gradually move toward farm villages outside the reserve to feed, leading to the potential risk of HEC.
Despite the increasing human protection of Asian elephants, the existential crisis of Asian elephants has been highlighted by the intensification of human–elephant conflicts. The practice of prohibiting all exploitation in the reserve has increased the forest cover, but it also threatens the survival and reproduction of Asian elephants to a certain extent. On the one hand, herbaceous plants naturally cannot grow well because the forest is too dense, resulting in the ground being deprived of sunlight. Furthermore, the fire-free forest management model affects the turnover rate of grasses and lianas, which reduces the food source of Asian elephants that live on herbs, grasses, and lianas. At the same time, under the influence of multiple development goals, such as agriculture and transportation, habitats that overlap with human activities are impacted by rising cash crop cultivation areas, the construction of highways, and other projects, affecting the migration and communication of Asian elephant populations. In other words, human activities continue to encroach on the living spaces of Asian elephants in different ways. For example, Asian elephants mainly live in valleys and rainforests. In the past 40 years, large areas of natural forests in the primary range of Asian elephants in Yunnan have been occupied by rubber and tea plantations. The share of the rubber plantation area expanded from 0.52% in 1975 to 12.71% in 2014, and the area covered by tea plantations increased from 8.77% to 22.01% [40]. This caused the habitat of Asian elephants to become disconnected and fragmented, thus forcing Asian elephants to leave their traditional habitats.
The general trend of regional changes in the wild elephant distribution in China is that the northern boundary of the distribution is gradually moving south [41]. Three thousand years ago, Asian elephants were widely distributed from the northernmost part of China to the Yellow River Basin [7]. However, with the development of human civilization and the intensification of economic and social activities, as well as excessive deforestation and potential climate change, the distribution of Asian elephants in China has retreated southward at a rate of 0.5° latitude per century [42]. The distribution area of Asian elephants has drastically decreased, and now they are predominantly distributed in Pu ‘er City, the Xishuangbanna National Nature Reserve, and the Nangunhe National Nature Reserve in Yunnan Province [40]. In fact, the Asian elephant population in Yunnan has always been characterized by migration and diffusion. According to the data records, the wild Asian elephants distributed in Simao disappeared in 1976 [43]. It was not until after 1992 that the Asian elephants that moved from Xishuangbanna began to move into Simao District [44]. According to the statistics of Asian elephant accidents in 2010, 14 Asian elephants moved northward to Simao District of Puer City in 2010, and more than 20 Asian elephants moved to Jiangcheng County in Puer City in 2011. In addition, in wild Asian elephants, as herbivores, cycle feeding patterns are critical factors affecting their migration and diffusion behavior. When food reserves in a certain area reach the upper limit of food intake, Asian elephants will move to another area for food and wait until the food resources in the previous area have recovered before returning to forage [32]. This causes Asian elephants to constantly migrate and spread in search of optimal foraging sites.
Humans are not the masters of the natural world; nature is a “community of life” of humans and non-humans, and the coexistence and co-prosperity of humans and non-humans is the real, sustainable future of human development [45]. The relationship between humans and wildlife is a critical dimension of the relationship between humans and nature. Wildlife is a vital part of the natural world and deserves equal rights with humans to live, and wildlife can also move, think, and feel emotions (especially pain) [46,47]. Understanding the behavior of wild animals is a key component of human respect for the survival rights of animals. HEC is a pressing issue in major habitat areas of Asian elephants worldwide. For the past 50 years, the “human–elephant retreat” scenario has been frequently played out in Xishuangbanna, China. Human activities have contracted the living space of Asian elephants, while the migration and incidents of Asian elephants undermine the livelihood of humans, and humans and Asian elephants harm each other without any benefit to either side. In this context, balancing the survival rights of Asian elephants with the welfare of human beings is a subject that needs to be studied in depth. Given this, the summary of Asian elephants’ behavior patterns is a critical path. Based on extended behavioral geography and news reports, this study analyzes the behavior of Asian elephants during their northern migration. However, because the media do not report every detail of the elephant movement, the data in this paper cannot represent the complete migration behavior of the elephants, and it needs to be verified by other scholars’ research.

4.2. Policy Implications

The prohibition of all exploitation is the current approach to protecting nature reserves in China. However, such approach to conservation is also seen as not respecting the existing patterns of human–elephant relationships. The over-protection of forest vegetation in the reserve has also caused a lack of understory plants, which has aggravated the islanding of wild elephants’ living spaces and forced Asian elephants to enter human living and production spaces to feed. Therefore, the proliferation of Asian elephants is inevitable. Many experts and scholars believe that the HEC is an inevitable practical problem [17,32,48]. Thus, it is crucial to explore how to protect Asian elephants and to cooperate with forest conservation and forest resources development in protected areas to mitigate human-elephant conflicts, based on a comprehensive analysis and summary of the experiences and lessons from the process of Asian elephants’ migration northward.
The first goal should be to change the perception and regard of animals as cohabitants of the natural space, respect the traditional use of communities, and to build a symbiotic relationship between people and ecosystems. For Asian elephants, there is no concept of “habitat,” and their choice of habitat depends on various factors, such as food availability, habitat characteristics, predation, and competition [49]. The awareness of local people in terms of wildlife protection should be improved through wildlife protection publicity to improve their knowledge and perception toward elephants. Forest and wildlife conservation also requires considering the wholeness of people and the ecosystem, respecting the objective laws of ecosystem succession, accepting natural disasters and natural phenomena, and respecting the authenticity of the forest system.
Second, it is necessary to change the protection mode. Traditional “closed” conservation strategies can effectively protect biodiversity in nature reserves but may not mitigate the conflicts between regional development and Asian elephants’ conservation [50]. Under the eviction model, communities are mostly clustered around the reserve, and human activities outside the reserve have blocked the biological corridors of Asian elephants. Therefore, there is a current need to strengthen the protection and management of forest resources based on the ecosystem capacity, restore the original biological corridor, and restore the real and complete natural forest ecosystem. Due to the diversity of wild animal species in the reserve, different species have varying habitat requirements. Therefore, establishing the Asian Elephant National Park might be urgently needed to protect Asian elephants [31]. Furthermore, a unified protection management system should be established by integrating and optimizing the existing habitat range to further protect Asian elephants in this area.
Finally, based on traditional methods, such as strengthening the protection of food sources and restoring habitats, we should strengthen the application of modern science and technology and build a better forest monitoring system. Using digital technology, the activity track, living habits, and ecological environment of Asian elephants can be mapped in the digital world. By analyzing the digital data, scientific and accurate decision support can be provided for the monitoring and early warning of Asian elephants and their habitats in practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Y., Q.G., and Y.C.; methodology, X.Q.; software, X.L.; validation, X.Q. and B.Z.; formal analysis, X.Q.; investigation, X.L.; resources, X.L.; data curation, X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; writing—review and editing, B.Z.; visualization, X.L.; supervision, X.Q.; project administration, X.Q.; funding acquisition, D.Y. and X.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 42271297 and 41901173). We are grateful for their support.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, J.; Wei, J.; Liu, W. Escalating human–wildlife conflict in the Wolong Nature Reserve, China: A dynamic and paradoxical process. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 7273–7283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Fandi, C.; Lin, W. Kunming Well Prepared as 15 Wild Elephants Intrude after 500 km Journey. 2021. Available online: www.globaltimes.cn/page/202106/1225293.shtml (accessed on 14 July 2021).
  3. Yin, D.; Yuan, Z.; Li, J.; Zhu, H. Mitigate human-wildlife conflict in China. Science 2021, 373, 500–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wen, S.; Zhou, J.; Li, J.; Xu, L.; Dong, R. Analysis of the spatial distribution characteristics of human-elephant conflicts in Jinghong City, Xishuangbanna. Environ. Sci. Surv. 2018, 37, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Neupane, D.; Kwon, Y.; Risch, T.S.; Williams, A.C.; Johnson, R.L. Habitat use by Asian elephants: Context matters. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019, 17, e00570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, W.; Yu, Y.; Liu, P.; Tang, R.; Dai, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, L. Identifying climate refugia and its potential impact on small population of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) in China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019, 19, e00664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, P.; Wen, H.; Lin, L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L. Habitat evaluation for Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Lincang: Conservation planning for an extremely small population of elephants in China. Biol. Conserv. 2016, 198, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Neupane, D.; Kwon, Y.; Risch, T.S.; Johnson, R.L. Changes in habitat suitability over a two decade period before and after Asian elephant recolonization. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 22, e01023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barua, M.; Bhagwat, S.A.; Jadhav, S. The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 157, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Githiru, M.; Mutwiwa, U.; Kasaine, S.; Schulte, B. A spanner in the works: Human–elephant conflict complicates the food–water–energy nexus in drylands of Africa. Front. Environ. Sci. 2017, 5, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nyhus, P.J. Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2016, 41, 143–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rakshya, T. Living with wildlife: Conflict or co-existence. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chiyo, P.I.; Cochrane, E.P.; Naughton, L.; Basuta, G.I. Temporal patterns of crop raiding by elephants: A response to changes in forage quality or crop availability? Afr. J. Ecol. 2005, 43, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Choudhury, A. Human–Elephant Conflicts in Northeast India. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2004, 9, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hazarika, A.; Dutta, H. Perceptions of human-elephant conflict around abhaypur reserve forest in northeast India. Gajah 2018, 48, 27–29. [Google Scholar]
  16. Billah, M.M.; Rahman, M.; Abedin, J.; Akter, H. Land cover change and its impact on human–elephant conflict: A case from Fashiakhali forest reserve in Bangladesh. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, W.; Liu, P.; Guo, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, L. Human-elephant conflict in Xishuangbanna Prefecture, China: Distribution, diffusion, and mitigation. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2018, 16, e00462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thant, Z.M.; May, R.; Røskaft, E. Pattern and distribution of human-elephant conflicts in three conflict-prone landscapes in Myanmar. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 25, e01411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abdullah, A.; Sayuti, A.; Hasanuddin, H.; Affan, M.; Wilson, G. People’s perceptions of elephant conservation and the human-elephant conflict in Aceh Jaya, Sumatra, Indonesia. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2019, 65, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mumby, H.S.; Plotnik, J.M. Taking the elephants’ perspective: Remembering elephant behavior, cognition and ecology in human-elephant conflict mitigation. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 6, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Nsonsi, F.; Heymans, J.; Diamouangana, J.; Mavinga, F.B.; Breuer, T. Perceived human–elephant conflict and its impact for elephant conservation in northern Congo. Afr. J. Ecol. 2018, 56, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Patil, M.D.; Patil, V.K. Farmers’ perceptions about elephant crop raiding in Sindhudurg District, Maharashtra, India. Gajah 2017, 47, 4–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rohini, C.K.; Aravindan, T.; Das, K.S.A.; Vinayan, P.A. Human–elephant conflict around north and south forest divisions of Nilambur, Kerala, India. Gajah 2016, 45, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sampson, C.; Leimgruber, P.; Rodriguez, S.; McEvoy, J.; Sotherden, E.; Tonkyn, D. Perception of Human–Elephant Conflict and Conservation Attitudes of Affected Communities in Myanmar. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2019, 12, 1940082919831242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Deng, X. Protection, Utilization and Sustainable Development Strategy of Forestry Resources in Nature Reserves. For. Sci. Technol. Inf. 2022, 54, 172–174. [Google Scholar]
  26. Golledge, R.G.; Stimson, R.J. Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective; Chai, Y.; Cao, X.; Long, T., Translators; The Commercial Press: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, R.; Castree, N.; Kitchin, R.; Lawson, V.; Paasi, A.; Philo, C.; Radcliffe, S.; Roberts, S.M.; Withers, C.W. More-than-human geographies. In The Sage Handbook of Human Geography; Sage: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2014; pp. 94–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Whatmore, S. Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces; Thousand Oaks: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  29. Whatmore, S. Humanism’s excess: Some thoughts on the ‘post-humanist’ agenda. Environ. Plan. A-Econ. Space 2004, 36, 1360–1363. [Google Scholar]
  30. Whatmore, S. Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cult. Geogr. 2006, 13, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, J.; Xu, T.; Ze, D. Study on the Rationality of “Closed” Protection Model in Nature Reserve: Reflections on the Incidents of the Asian Elephants in Xishuangbanna. Issues For. Econ. 2020, 40, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen, M.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, F.; Bao, M.; Zheng, X. Research on Asian Elephant Behavior; Yunnan Science and Technology Press: Kunming, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  33. Glaser, B.; Strauss, A. The discovery of grounded theory. In Strategies for Qualitative Research; The Sociology Press: Mill Valley, CA, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, M.; Bai, L.; Gong, S.; Huang, L. Determinants of consumer food safety self-protection behavior—An analysis using grounded theory. Food Control. 2020, 113, 107198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xue, W.; Li, H.; Ali, R.; Rehman, R.U. Knowledge Mapping of Corporate Financial Performance Research: A Visual Analysis Using Cite Space and Ucinet. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sukumar, R. The Living Elephants: Evolutionary Ecology, Behaviour, and Conservation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  37. Joshi, R. Asian elephant’s (Elephas maximus) behaviour in the Rajaji National Park, North-West India: Eight years with Asian elephants. Nat. Sci. 2009, 7, 49–77. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wanghongsa, S.; Boonkird, K.; Saengsen, D.; Jantarat, N. Ecological density of elephants in Khao Ang Rue Nai Wildlife Sanctuary. Wildl. Yearb. 2007, 8, 44–62. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sukumar, R. The Asian Elephant: Ecology and Management; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, P.; Wen, H.; Harich, F.K.; He, C.; Wang, L.; Guo, X.; Zhao, J.; Luo, A.; Yang, H.; Sun, X.; et al. Conflict between conservation and development: Cash forest encroachment in Asian elephant distributions. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, M.; Wu, Z.; Dong, Y. Research on Asian Elephants in China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sun, G.; Xu, Q.; Jin, K.; Wang, Z.; Lang, Y. The historical withdrawal of wild Elephas maximus in China and its relationship with human population pressure. J. Northeast. For. Univ. 1998, 26, 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  43. Editorial Board of Simao County Records. Simao County Records; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang, L. Living with the elephants. Anim. Update Spring/Summer 2000, 1, 10. [Google Scholar]
  45. Schlesinger, J. A World Trimmed with Fur: Wild Things, Pristine Places, and the Natural Fringes of Qing Rule; Stanford University Press: Redwood City, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Souza, I.M.D.A. Eduardo Kohn’s How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  47. Singer, P. Animal Liberation: The Definitive Classic of the Animal Liberation Movement; Harper Collins Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  48. Munyao, M.; Siljander, M.; Johansson, T.; Makokha, G.; Pellikka, P. Assessment of human–elephant conflicts in multifunctional landscapes of Taita Taveta County, Kenya. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 24, e01382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Williams, E.; Bremner-Harrison, S.; Harvey, N.; Evison, E.; Yon, L. An investigation into resting behavior in Asian elephants in UK zoos. Zoo Biol. 2015, 34, 406–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, L.; Ma, L.; Feng, L. New challenges facing traditional nature reserves: Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) conservation in China. Integr. Zool. 2006, 1, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Analysis framework.
Figure 1. Analysis framework.
Forests 14 00122 g001
Figure 2. Co-occurrence network of keywords. The points in the figure represent nodes, and the edges represent connections between nodes. The arrow represents the direction of the edge. The larger the node, the stronger the centrality. The closer the words are to the central node core node, the stronger the connection with the central node words.
Figure 2. Co-occurrence network of keywords. The points in the figure represent nodes, and the edges represent connections between nodes. The arrow represents the direction of the edge. The larger the node, the stronger the centrality. The closer the words are to the central node core node, the stronger the connection with the central node words.
Forests 14 00122 g002
Table 1. Example of open coding.
Table 1. Example of open coding.
Part of the Original DataConceptualizationPreliminary Categorization
Asian elephants came to play in the water near Yuanjiang County, Yunnan ProvincePlay in the waterPlay and bathing behavior
Elephants take a rest in the woodland near Longwu Town, Shiping CountyWoodland, restRest behavior
They frequently enter the village, causing some villagers’ crops and houses to be destroyedDestroy houses and cropsEconomic loss
Asian elephant habitat shrinks significantly, down by as much as 40%Habitat area reductionHabitat change
Table 2. Main category and corresponding category.
Table 2. Main category and corresponding category.
Main CategoryCorresponding Category
Behavior typeForaging behavior; resting behavior; moving behavior; play and bathing behavior
Behavioral preferenceForaging place selection preference; resting place selection preference; play and bathing place selection preference; movement path selection preference
Behavioral consequenceEconomic loss; life impact
Migration-diffusion properties of speciesMigration habit; wandering habit
Habitat destructionHabitat change; habitat fragmentation; food source shortage
Protection of wild animals and forestsAnimal protection; ecological protection
Pre-risk warningInformation tracking
Guide in dangerRoad dredging; human–elephant isolation; auxiliary elephant group; departmental collaboration
Post-risk preventionIdeological education; compensation and restoration
Table 3. Core category.
Table 3. Core category.
Core CategoryMain Category
Behavioral characteristics Behavior type; behavioral preference; behavioral consequence
Causes of the migrationProtection of wild animals and forests; habitat destruction; migration-diffusion properties of species
Response measuresPre-risk warning; guide in danger; post-risk prevention
Table 4. Examples of co-occurrence matrix of keywords.
Table 4. Examples of co-occurrence matrix of keywords.
KeywordMovingForagingEveningAfternoonRestHomeWoodland
Moving0484022
Foraging5037032
Evening10301704
Afternoon4710400
Rest1074000
Home2300000
Woodland2200000
Note: The number indicates the frequency of co-occurrence of two keywords.
Table 5. Top 5 high-frequency keywords.
Table 5. Top 5 high-frequency keywords.
KeywordFrequency
Moving55
Foraging24
Evening20
Resting13
Afternoon12
Table 6. Behaviors of Asian elephants and their impact on humans.
Table 6. Behaviors of Asian elephants and their impact on humans.
Behavior TypeBehavioral DescriptionSelected Relevant High-Frequency WordsFrequency
Foraging behaviorFeeding on various plants or sucking water through the trunk and putting it into the mouthForaging, eating, enjoying, salt, finding food, drinking24
Moving behaviorWalking or runningMove, leave, return, descend, move south, start, arrive, cross, break in, cross the river, pass, enter the village, visit55
Resting behaviorThe body is in a state of complete relaxation, such as standing still or lying on the ground to restSleep, rest, nap, lethargy13
Play and bathing behaviorPlayfulness or lowering body temperaturePlaying, bathing, playing in the water, playing around11
Table 7. Degree centrality of keywords.
Table 7. Degree centrality of keywords.
NodeDegree
Foraging40.000
Evening33.000
Moving32.000
Afternoon19.000
Rest17.000
Home10.000
Woodland10.000
Morning9.000
Corn9.000
Corn field7.000
Hilltop7.000
Street5.000
Mean9.280
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, X.; Yin, D.; Gao, Q.; Qi, X.; Cheng, Y.; Zheng, B. Extending the Behavioral Geography within the Context of Forest Restoration: Research on the Geographical Behaviors of Northern-Migrating Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) in Southwest China. Forests 2023, 14, 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010122

AMA Style

Lin X, Yin D, Gao Q, Qi X, Cheng Y, Zheng B. Extending the Behavioral Geography within the Context of Forest Restoration: Research on the Geographical Behaviors of Northern-Migrating Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) in Southwest China. Forests. 2023; 14(1):122. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010122

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Xijie, Duo Yin, Quan Gao, Xinhua Qi, Yu Cheng, and Boming Zheng. 2023. "Extending the Behavioral Geography within the Context of Forest Restoration: Research on the Geographical Behaviors of Northern-Migrating Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) in Southwest China" Forests 14, no. 1: 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010122

APA Style

Lin, X., Yin, D., Gao, Q., Qi, X., Cheng, Y., & Zheng, B. (2023). Extending the Behavioral Geography within the Context of Forest Restoration: Research on the Geographical Behaviors of Northern-Migrating Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) in Southwest China. Forests, 14(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010122

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop