Next Article in Journal
Variation in the Basic Density of Woods Produced in the Brazilian Semiarid Region Subjected to Different Irrigation Regimes
Previous Article in Journal
Foraging Niche Differentiation of Five Woodpecker Species in the Primitive Broadleaved Korean Pine Forests of Northeast China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dendrometric Relationships and Biomass in Commercial Plantations of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon

by
Lucas Sérgio de Sousa Lopes
1,*,
Daniela Pauletto
2,
Emeli Susane Costa Gomes
3,
Ádria Fernandes da Silva
4,
Thiago Gomes de Sousa Oliveira
5,
Jéssica Aline Godinho da Silva
6,
Diego Damázio Baloneque
7 and
Lucieta Guerreiro Martorano
8
1
Department of Forestry Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Brazil
2
Postgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology, Institute of Biodiversity and Forests, Federal University of Western Pará, Santarém 68040-255, Brazil
3
Postgraduate Program in Plant Genetic Resources, Plant Science Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88034-350, Brazil
4
National Amazon Research Institute, Manaus 69067-375, Brazil
5
Independent Researcher, Curitiba 80210-350, Brazil
6
Environment Secretariat of Santarém City Hall, Santarém 68030-290, Brazil
7
Independent Researcher, Tucumã 68385-000, Brazil
8
Postgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology, Postgraduate Doctorate Program in Society, Nature and Development, Embrapa Eastern Amazon, Santarém 68345-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(11), 2167; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14112167
Submission received: 28 September 2023 / Revised: 27 October 2023 / Accepted: 28 October 2023 / Published: 31 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Inventory, Modeling and Remote Sensing)

Abstract

:
The objective of this study is to characterize and compare the relationships between dendrometric variables in Dipteryx spp. stands in the Western Amazon by fitting linear regression equations for total height (ht) and crown diameter (dc). Six forest stands were evaluated in three municipalities. The variables collected included diameter at 1.3 m height (dbh), ht, and dc. Simple and multiple linear regression equations were fitted to characterize the relationships between ht and dc. The aboveground biomass and carbon stock of the stands were estimated. Most dendrometric variables were positively correlated (97.5%). The general equations presented an R2adj. greater than 0.7, and all coefficients were significant. Equations with non-significant coefficients were common in settlement adjustments (45%). The error for these equations varied between 1.1 and 23.6 m. The trees averaged 22 t ha−1 of aboveground biomass in the stands. There was a variation in carbon sequestration potential among stands, ranging from 5.12 to 88.91 t CO2 ha−1. Single-input equations using dbh as an independent variable are recommended for estimating dc and ht for individual Dipteryx spp. stands. Stands in the Western Amazon play a significant role in carbon sequestration and accumulation. Trees can sequester an average of 4.8 tons of CO2 per year.

1. Introduction

The Amazon rainforest is widely recognized as one of the main ecosystems on the planet and is the largest tropical forest in Brazil, covering approximately 60% of the national territory [1]. In its extension of 5,015,068 km2 in the region known as the Legal Amazon, the forest is home to a great diversity of living organisms, including a wide variety of plants and animals [2,3]. In addition to preserving biodiversity, the Amazon ecosystem also provides important environmental services, such as carbon storage and contribution to the conservation of water resources, playing a key role in maintaining the global climate [4,5,6].
Regardless of their relevance, tropical forests in the Amazon region have been severely impacted by the expansion of the agricultural and livestock frontier, illegal logging and mining, and other activities since the 1970s [7,8,9]. These practices directly reflect high deforestation rates and increased degradation of areas [10].
From this context, the adoption of production systems focused on supplying goods and services sustainably, such as reforestation with native species and agroforestry systems (AFS), is considered a very promising alternative [11,12]. These systems are legally and environmentally accepted as sustainable alternatives for the conversion of degraded areas and help to reduce the exploration pressure on native forests [13,14], in addition to their potential for providing ecosystem services due to their similarity with a natural environment of secondary forest [15].
Among the various species used in reforestation in the Amazon, those of the genus Dipteryx, popularly known as tonka beans, stand out. The adoption of tonka beans as a tree component in agroforestry systems is a widespread silvicultural practice by small and medium-sized producers in the Eastern Amazon [16,17]. Part of the interest of producers is related to the possibility of multiple uses of the species and its growth potential in degraded areas [18,19]. Its use is extremely diverse; however, it stands out for containing an aromatic essential oil in its seeds that is widely used in the cosmetics, perfumery, and pharmaceutical industries [20], as well as showing potential for antifungal action [21]. In regard to the production of tonka beans, the state of Pará is responsible for a significant portion of it, with a production of 79 tons per year [1].
Knowledge of the dendrometric variables of a forest stand is essential for its proper management since it is part of the production prognosis [22]. Estimates of variables such as total height, stem volume, crown diameter, and others, through regression models, enable adequate and sustainable management of production, as well as assist in decision-making [23,24]. In addition, knowledge of the behavior of dendrometric variables allows recommending interventions, such as the application of thinning, and inferring about the growth of the population.
The Amazon Forest has significant carbon sequestration potential and plays an essential role in regulating the planet’s climate [25,26]. In recent decades, forestry research has focused on assessing carbon absorption in natural forests and its impacts [27]. However, there is a notable gap in the attention devoted to the potential of reforested ecosystems, such as AFS and monocultures of native species [14,27]. Given the context of Brazil’s commitment to reforest 12 million hectares by 2030 as part of the Paris Agreement, aiming for a net reduction in carbon emissions, it is essential to fully explore the potential of these initiatives [28].
Dipteryx spp. stands out as a tree with the capacity to store large amounts of carbon compared to other native wood species [29], indicating that stands planted with this species have a high potential for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, thus aiding in the fight against climate change. Estimates of biomass and carbon sequestration are a fundamental part of the process of dealing with climate change, which already affects the climate of large cities, altering temperatures in agricultural and urban areas [30,31]. Furthermore, forecasts indicate changes in urban development and food production in both the short and long term [32,32].
Scientific and technological advances have driven a significant increase in the productivity of reforestation with species of the genus Eucalyptus and Pinus in the southeastern and southern regions of Brazil, as highlighted by [33]. However, similar advances have not yet been observed in the planting of native species, especially in the Amazon region. Dipteryx spp. has been the subject of study in a large number of recent research projects. However, these studies are primarily concentrated on wood production in native forests [29,34] and the potential use of almonds and coumarin [21,35,36].
In the context of the Amazon region, the cultivation of native species for timber purposes is still at an early stage, and it is mainly aimed at small producers, as evidenced by mapping works carried out in western Pará [16,37]. In this sense, the objective of this work is to characterize and compare the relationships between dendrometric variables in populations of Dipteryx spp. in the Western Amazon by adjusting regression equations for total height and crown diameter.

2. Materials and Methods

Study and Data Collection Locations

The present research was conducted in six distinct reforestation areas located in three municipalities (Alenquer, Belterra, and Mojuí dos Campos) in the Western Amazon, more specifically in the west of the state of Pará, Brazil (Figure 1). The surveyed stands are part of the sample for the project ‘Socio-economic and environmental assessment of agroforestry systems in Western Pará’, which conducts research on silvicultural practices in the Eastern Amazon region. Stands with Dipteryx spp. were selected and integrated as a tree component, with a priority on the municipality of Alenquer, which hosts the largest almond production in Brazil. The selection of plantations was conducted with the assistance of extension agents and technicians from the environment and agriculture departments of the involved municipalities.
The predominant climate in the region is hot and humid, with rainfall concentrated in the first half of the year, an average annual temperature between 25 °C and 27 °C, an average air humidity of 86%, and an average annual rainfall of 1920 mm, varying in terms of monthly rainfall between 170 mm and 60 mm [38], being part of the Am3 climate subtype, except for the northern portion of Belterra, with an Am4 subtype [39]. The predominant soil types in the region are oxisols and argisols, which correspond to 81% of the state of Pará [40]. The vegetation typology is called Dense Ombrophylous Forest [41].
Sampling of tonka bean trees was carried out in six stands of different ages and spatial arrangements, four of these being agrisilvicultural systems, one silvopastoral system, and one monoculture area (Table 1). More detailed descriptions of the sampled systems can be found in [16,17,42].
The sampling of the measured trees was carried out systematically, excluding individuals located at the edges of plantations and the subsequent trees, as shown in Figure 2. The dendrometric variables, diameter at 1.3 m height (dbh), total height (ht), commercial height (hc), crown length (cc), and crown diameter (dc), were collected from 25 trees in each system and 50 trees in the silvopastoral system. The dbh was measured with a dendrometric tape around the perimeter of the trees at a height of 1.30 m in relation to the ground level. Total and commercial heights were measured indirectly with the aid of a Vertex IV hypsometer with a T3 transponder. To obtain the crown diameter, two measurements were taken, one in the east–west direction and the other in the north–south direction, using a 50 m measuring tape. The mean of the two measurements was considered as the dc of the tree. The crown length of each individual was determined from the difference between the total height of the tree and the crown insertion height, as recommended by [42].

3. Statistical Analysis

The total individual volume with tree bark (m3) was estimated using a volumetric equation (Equation (1)) adjusted for individuals of Dipteryx spp. in the state of Pará, which is available in [38]. Due to the scarcity of specific equations to estimate the species’ biomass (kg per tree), it was decided to use the double-entry equation (Equation (2)) adjusted by [43] for tropical forests in the Amazon region. The value of basic wood density (p) for tonka bean trees of 0.87 g cm−3 was adopted, corresponding to the average of the densities reported for the species in the literature [44,45,46]. To calculate the carbon stock, it was considered that 50% of the biomass corresponds to carbon, and the conversion factor of carbon stock into carbon sequestration (CO2) used was 3.67 [47]. Annual carbon sequestration rates were obtained by dividing the total carbon sequestered by the age of the settlement. The equations, adjusted by [37,43], along with their estimated coefficients and adjusted determination coefficients (R2adj.), are described below:
v = 0.009440 + 0.0000241 × dbh2ht
R2adj. = 0.891
w = p × exp(−1.499 + 2.148 × ln(dbh) + 0.207 × (ln(dbh))2 – 0.0281 × (ln(dbh))3)
R2adj. = 0.996
Pearson’s correlation coefficients were estimated for the dendrometric variables (ht, hc, dc, cc, dbh, v, and w) in each of the stands considering a significance of 5%. The descriptive statistics of the dendrometric variables evaluated in the different stands are presented in Table 2.
The regression technique was adopted to identify the relationships between the variables dc, ht, and dbh in each of the Dipteryx spp. populations, as well as to develop equations for estimating the variables dc and ht. We employed simple regression to fit single-input equations using only the dbh. Additionally, multiple regression models were adjusted to understand the effect of incorporating dc and ht into the generated equations. Before adjusting the regression models, the Shapiro–Wilk normality test was applied with 5% significance. In order to meet the assumption of normality for all stands, it was decided to adjust the models on a logarithmic scale.
Simple (Equations (3) and (4)) and multiple (Equations (5) and (6)) linear regression models were adjusted for each of the stands, using the total height (ht) and crown diameter (dc) as dependent variables. The evaluation of adjustments was performed using the adjusted determination coefficient, R2adj. (Equation (7)), and the standard error of estimates of total height and crown diameter, Syx (Equation (8)).
The overall significance of the models was tested using the F-test for regression models at 5% significance (Equation (9)). In addition to the statistical criteria, the scatter plots between the values of the estimated and observed variables were evaluated graphically. Stands that did not show significant regression were grouped and subsequently subjected to model identity testing [48] for comparison with other stands (Table S1). The best models were selected based on fit statistics, global significance, estimated coefficients, and graphical performance.
L n ( h t ) = β 0 + β 1 l n ( d b h ) + ε
l n ( d c ) = β 0 + β 1 l n ( d b h ) + ε
l n h t = β 0 + β 1 l n d b h + β 2 l n d c + ε
l n d c = β 0 + β 1 l n d b h + β 2 l n h t + ε
R 2 a d j . = 1 Q M r e s Q M t o t a l
S y x = Q M r e s
F c a l = Q M r e g Q M r e s
where βn = estimated regression coefficient; ln = natural logarithm; ε = random error; n = number of observations; Q M r e s = residual mean square; and Q M r e g = regression mean square.

4. Results

Most of the significant correlations (95% probability) between the dendrometric variables evaluated in the tonka bean trees stands are positive (Figure 3). The AFS 2 and 4 systems showed a negative and significant relationship between marketable height and canopy diameter, these being the only negative correlation coefficients found in the 6 stands. The dendrometric variables dbh, individual volume, and biomass per area showed strong and very strong correlation values, with values above 0.86 for all stands.
The AFS 1 and AFS 4 stands did not show significant regressions (5% significance) for total height and crown diameter (Tables S2 and S3). Thus, the models were adjusted jointly for these stands (Table 3 and Table 4). The general equations adjusted with data from all stands for dc and ht showed global significance by the F-test, and all estimated coefficients were significant by the t-test in both models. The values of R2adj. were greater than 0.70 for the four equations.
All adjustments stratified by stands for total height and crown diameter showed significance considering the 5% level by the F-test (Table 3). However, of the 20 equations adjusted for individual stands, only 8 are significant for all coefficients estimated by the t-test (5% significance). For the simple equations to estimate crown diameter, the AFS 3, homogeneous and silvopastoral stands did not show a significant β0 coefficient, which does not generate practical implications, since they are simple linear equations.
All estimated coefficients for the simple linear model to estimate total height were significant at 5%, according to the t-test (Table 3). However, the multiple regression models with the introduction of the dc variable generated at least one non-significant estimated coefficient in each of the stands. The highest values of R2adj. and the lowest value of Syx were obtained with the multiple model.
For the homogeneous population, the equation adjusted from the multiple model for dc showed significance for the regression by the F-test (5% significance); however, none of the estimated coefficients were significant by the t-test (Table 4). The coefficient of determination adjusted for multiple equations varied between 0.55 and 0.80, being higher than for simple linear equations. However, only the adjusted equation for the silvopastoral stand presented all the estimated significant coefficients.
Estimates of total height (Figure 4) and crown diameter (Figure 5) were plotted against the observed values for each stand. The general equations, using both models, resulted in overestimation and underestimation trends for the two estimated variables. Such trends can be seen more expressively in the AFS 1, AFS 2, AFS 4, and silvopastoral stands for both variables. Estimates for the simple linear model obtained slightly more heterogeneous dispersions when compared to the values estimated by the multiple model, both for total height and for crown diameters.
Table 5 contains estimates of volume, aboveground biomass, carbon stored above ground, and carbon sequestration per area in each tonka bean stand. The average aboveground biomass of the tonka bean stands was 22 t ha−1 (±15 t ha−1), which indicates a significant potential for carbon storage in these areas. The average amount of carbon stored in the tonka bean trees was 11.07 t C ha−1 (±7.64 t C ha−1). Furthermore, the total amount of carbon sequestered by population varied considerably, with values between 5.12 and 88.91 t CO2 ha−1, with an average of 40.64 (±28 t CO2 ha−1).
The annual carbon sequestration rates of the different systems varied between 0.64 and 9.88 t CO2 ha−1 yr−1, with an average of 4.84 t CO2 ha−1 yr−1 (±3.16 t CO2 ha−1 yr−1). AFS 4 obtained the highest values for all evaluated variables, with an estimated CO2 sequestration potential 17 times greater than the system with the lowest amount of CO2 (AFS 3).

5. Discussion

Equine stands, in general, demonstrate greater correlations between dendrometric variables due to characteristics shared by trees, such as the same spacing and the same age [49,50,51]. In these stands, competition conditions for light and nutrients tend to be similar, which may lead to well-defined correlations between dendrometric variables [52,53].
The negative correlations between dc and hc found in AFS 2 and 4 demonstrate that tonka bean trees with larger crown diameters have lower commercial heights, which apparently, in this study, is related to conducting AFS 2 with periodic silvicultural pruning operations and, in the case of AFS 4, due to the predominance of the D. punctata species [17] and the greater availability of space. Commercial height has a strong biological relationship with tree crown diameter and crown vigor, since the lower branches of living crowns may die, resulting in an increase in hc and a reduction in dc [54,55]. The relationships between morphometric parameters, such as crown diameter and tree height, are strongly influenced by individual species, as well as site and competition-related factors [56,57].
Tree species inserted in systems with greater structural complexity, both vertically and horizontally, as in AFS 2 and 4, which have arrangements composed of other tree species, tend to have greater plasticity of the crowns [58]. Thus, the negative correlation between hc and dc may also be associated with a strategy of the tonka bean trees to circumvent the competition microclimate established by the interaction with other species in AFS 2 and 4, investing in crown growth and aiming to increase the amount of intercepted light [49,59].
From a productive point of view, tonka bean trees with lower commercial heights and larger crown diameters are preferable, as they facilitate the collection of fruits by farmers. Even so, it is worth mentioning that hc and canopy insertion require minimum values due to their influence on the operability of fruit harvesting, since for tonka beans, it is expected that there will be maturation for the collection of fruits under the canopy. Thus, trees with crown insertions below the average height of workers can make the operation more time-consuming and costly.
Very strong positive correlations between tree diameter, bole volume, and aerial biomass are expected in even stands and may be associated with several factors. In the present study, both the bole volume and the tree biomass were estimated indirectly through allometric equations where the dbh was one of the independent variables. However, these positive relationships are expected even without the interference of the equations, since the dbh is a variable that biologically and mathematically expresses the dimensions of tree individuals and their growth [22,60,61].
The β1 coefficients, estimated by the simple linear models for the two variables, indicate that when increasing 1 cm in the dbh of the tonka bean trees, there is an average increase of 1.01 m in the total height of the tree and of 0.87 m in the diameter of the crown. All equations adjusted with collective data from the six tonka bean stands resulted in adjustments with global statistical significance and in the estimated parameters, as well as adequate precision statistics. Thus, such equations can be used to estimate the total height and crown diameter dendrometric variables in other stands of tonka bean trees in the Eastern Amazon with just the diameter of the trees.
The measurement of variables such as crown diameter and total tree height is quite costly, and in cases of multistrata stands, such as AFS and uneven forests, it becomes even more complex due to overlapping crowns [62,63]. Regression equations that estimate these variables accurately are essential for prescriptions for silvicultural purposes and management of stands, since they make it possible to obtain the dimensions of trees from easily measured variables and, combined with other methods, provide available wood stocks or other products [64,65].
The significant coefficients of the adjusted simple linear model equations for total height demonstrate the strong correlation between tree height and diameter at a height of 1.3 m. This strong biological relationship between dbh and total height is expected in forest stands, allowing the construction of allometric models with high precision and biological realism [22,66].
The introduction of the crown diameter variable in the equations for estimating the total height resulted in equations with high multicollinearity, and the opposite was also observed in the equations for estimating the crown diameter. Multicollinearity can be identified from the existence of regression equations with global significance by the F-test, that have non-significant estimated coefficients, as in the cases of multiple regressions of total height and crown diameter adjusted individually for the stands [67].
In the multiple equations to estimate the crown diameter, the effect of the multicollinearity generated by the correlation between dbh and total height can be seen in a more accentuated way in the adjusted equation to estimate the dc in the homogeneous stand. The strong association between these independent variables generates a significant effect on crown diameter; however, individually, the effect is not very significant since there is a high correlation between the variables, resulting in non-significant coefficients. It is possible to use equations with multicollinearity to generate estimates of the dependent variables without major losses; however, the interpretation of the estimated parameters and the relationships performed between the variables are compromised [67,68,69].
Simple linear models graphically demonstrated greater dispersion in the distribution between estimated and observed values; however, they generated equations with significance and the absence of multicollinearity. The general equations, although significant, showed different performances among the tonka bean stands, with the presence of estimation trends in some cases. The graphical performance of the estimates generated through the equations adjusted by the stand may be a reflection of the adjustment strategy by stratification, which allows the adjustment of specific equations for each of the stands. In many cases, the adoption of stratification tends to reduce the presence of under and overestimation trends in the dependent variables, in addition to being more efficient in capturing different behaviors between the variables studied in different strata [70,71].
When fitting equations for the total height of Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd. in iLPF in the western region of the state of Pará, ref. [37] also found more favorable results, including higher adjusted R2adj., using simple linear regression models. The addition of variables to the multiple models also resulted in adjusted coefficients without statistical significance.
The use of models for the selection and adjustment of equations based on easy-to-measure inventory variables, such as dbh, has significant potential to help small and medium-sized forestry producers who have restricted access to technical assistance and consulting resources [72,73]. The application of equations, together with the use of electronic spreadsheets and mobile applications that allow the precise measurement of dendrometric variables, can be considered an essential tool for the implementation of forest production control strategies in reforestation areas [74,75]. The dissemination and use of these tools in the management of tonka bean plantations managed by small and medium-sized producers in the Amazon region can significantly improve production, as they allow better production control.
Variations in aboveground biomass, carbon, and carbon sequestration between systems may be related to characteristics such as species richness, planting density adopted for the tree component, and the age of each of the reforestation areas [76,77,78,79]. Large variations in these parameters between systems were also observed by [80] when evaluating AFS in the Western Amazon region. When mapping the aboveground biomass of trees in agroforestry systems in the Brazilian Amazon, ref. [81] found an average value of 105 t ha−1. The carbon stock for trees in agroforestry systems dominated by Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. Ex A. Juss.) Müll. Arg, as found by [82], was 55 t ha−1. These values are higher than those found for populations of Dipteryx spp. in this study. However, it is important to highlight that these values consider all tree species present in the systems.
Carbon sequestration rates reflect the ability of plantation systems to capture and store atmospheric carbon over time, which could be compensated or subsidized with payment programs for environmental services due to the perennial cultivation of tonka bean trees as a form of stimulus mainly to family-based farmers [83,84]. The successful values of AFS 4 were mainly driven by the high values of crown length, total height, and crown diameter.
Production systems with tonka bean trees have a variable potential for carbon sequestration, with a high range of values between stands, as well as biomass and carbon stocks that are close to those of other perennial species included in reforestation and AFS [85,86]. Reforestation areas are strategic systems for carbon sequestration in the Amazon region, especially AFS and consortia with multiple perennial species [87]. The carbon sequestration potential is strongly influenced by factors such as environmental conditions, management and silvicultural practices adopted in the system, the regions where the plantations are located, and others [88].
Tonka beans reforestation areas in the Eastern Amazon region have a complex diversity of adopted silvicultural practices, including even the absence of interventions, which contributes significantly to the variation in stocks and the potential for carbon sequestration [16,88]. In addition, the different types of productive arrangements adopted, and the history of the cultivated areas, also play a fundamental role in the differences in the carbon sequestration potential of the agroecosystem [80,85].
It is important to point out that this study focused only on estimating the biomass and carbon sequestration of the tonka bean trees present in the studied systems. This fact implies that the carbon sequestration potential of these systems is being underestimated since the carbon stored in the soil and in other consortium species is not being considered. In any case, this study indicates, even considering only one perennial species, the importance of intercropping crops mainly as an environmental regulation service, contributing to the sustainability of the system [89].

6. Conclusions

The regression models demonstrated a linear relationship between total height, crown diameter, and diameter at 1.3 m height for Dipteryx spp. trees in various settlements in the Eastern Amazon.
Simple linear equations that use dbh as an independent variable are recommended, both in the stratified adjustment forms for each stand and in general form as they present good precision and significant estimated parameters.
The use of simple input equations with dbh is operationally easier since they only need to measure the diameter of the trees at a height of 1.3 m.
Multiple linear equations fitted with data from this research can be used to estimate the dendrometric variables (ht and dc) in new tonka bean stands in the Eastern Amazon with good precision. However, the equations generated from the adjustments stratified by stand present multicollinearity, indicating the need for caution in their use.
Culture systems that include individuals of Dipteryx spp. as a tree component are able to sequester, on average, 4.8 tons of CO2 per year.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f14112167/s1, Table S1: Identity tests for models adjusted for total height (ht) and crown diameter (dc) for Dipteryx spp. in Eastern Amazonia, considering the group formed between AFS 1 and 4 stands; Table S2: Estimated coefficients and fit statistics of linear and multiple regression models for total height (ht) in stands non-significant (5% significance) of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon; Table S3: Estimated coefficients and fit statistics of linear and multiple regression models for crown diameter (dc) in stands non-significant (5% significance) of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S.d.S.L. and D.P.; methodology, L.S.d.S.L. and D.P.; software, L.S.d.S.L.; validation, L.G.M.; formal analysis, D.D.B., E.S.C.G., J.A.G.d.S. and Á.F.d.S.; investigation, D.P. and L.S.d.S.L.; resources, D.P.; data curation, D.P. and T.G.d.S.O.; writing—original draft preparation, L.S.d.S.L., E.S.C.G. and T.G.d.S.O.; writing—review and editing, L.S.d.S.L., D.P. and L.G.M.; visualization, L.S.d.S.L.; supervision, L.G.M.; project administration, D.P.; funding acquisition, D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Pro-Rector of Research, Graduate Studies and Technological Innovation (Proppit), and Promotion Program for Course Completion Works—PROTCC of the Federal University of West Pará. Additionally, the payment of the article processing charges (APC) was funded through resources provided by the Call for Proposals 03/2022/PROPPIT/UFOPA-PAPCIQ, Program for Support of Qualified Scientific Publications. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. These data are not accessible to the general public due to their use in additional analyses for future publication that involve other approaches, including machine learning.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the rural producers who allowed the research to be carried out on their properties and the students who collaborated in collecting information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Mapa da Amazônia Legal 2022; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021.
  2. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática—SIDRA; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021.
  3. Peres, C.A.; Campos-Silva, J.; Ritter, C.D. Environmental policy at a critical junction in the Brazilian Amazon. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2023, 38, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fearnside, P.M. Valoração do estoque de serviços ambientais como estratégia de desenvolvimento no Estado do Amazonas. Inclusão Soc. 2018, 12, 141–151. [Google Scholar]
  5. Homma, A.K.O. Amazônia: Venda de Serviços Ambientais ou de Atividades Produtivas? Terceira Margem Amaz. 2021, 6, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lapola, D.M.; Pinho, P.; Barlow, J.; Aragão, L.E.O.C.; Berenguer, E.; Carmenta, R.; Liddy, H.M.; Seixas, H.; Silva, C.V.J.; Silva-Junior, C.H.L.; et al. The drivers and impacts of Amazon forest degradation. Science 2023, 379, eabp8622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Potapov, P.; Hansen, M.C.; Laestadius, L.; Turubanova, S.; Yaroshenko, A.; Thies, C.; Smith, W.; Zhuravleva, I.; Komarova, A.; Minnemeyer, S.; et al. The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1600821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. da Cruz, D.C.; Ferreira, G.C.; Ribeiro, S.S.; Schwartz, G.; Monteiro, A. Priority areas for restoration in permanent preserrmedvation areas of rural properties in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 2022, 115, 106030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nunes, C.A.; Berenguer, E.; Frana, F.; Ferreira, J.; Lees, A.C.; Louzada, J.; Sayer, E.; Solar, R.; Smth, C.C.; Aragao, L.E.O.C.; et al. Linking land-use and land-cover transitions to their ecological impact in the Amazon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2202310119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sonter, L.J.; Herrera, D.; Barrett, D.J.; Galford, G.L.; Moran, C.J.; Soares-Filho, B.S. Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vasconcelos, A.Í.T.; Garcia, E.A.d.R.; Furtado, C.F.C.; Cabral, J.E.D.O. As dimensões da sustentabilidade dos Sistemas Agroflorestais—SAFs: Um estudo no Projeto de Reflorestamento Consorciado e Adensado—RECA, Ponta do Abunã—RO. Desenvolv. Meio Ambiente 2016, 36, 73–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. da Cruz, D.C.; Benayas, J.M.R.; Ferreira, G.C.; Santos, S.R.; Schwartz, G. An overview of forest loss and restoration in the Brazilian Amazon. New For. 2021, 52, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. BRASIL. Lei nº 12.651, de 25 de maio de 2012. Dispõe sobre a proteção da vegetação nativa; altera as Leis nºs 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981, 9.393, de 19 de dezembro de 1996, e 11.428, de 22 de dezembro de 2006; revoga as Leis nºs 4.771, de 15 de setembro de 1965, e 7.754, de 14 de abril de 1989, e a Medida Provisória nº 2.166-67, de 24 de agosto de 2001; e dá outras providências. Available online: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12651.htm (accessed on 20 June 2023).
  14. Villa, P.M.; Martins, S.V.; de Oliveira Neto, S.N.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Hernández, E.P.; Kim, D.G. Policy forum: Shifting cultivation and agroforestry in the Amazon: Premises for REDD+. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 118, 102217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. de Vasconcellos, R.C.; Beltrão, N.E.S. Avaliação de prestação de serviços ecossistêmicos em sistemas agroflorestais através de indicadores ambientais. Interações 2018, 19, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. da Silva, J.A.G.; Pauletto, D.; da Silva, A.F.; Carvalho, C.D.S.d.S.; Nascimento, H.G.G.D. Morfometria de Plantios de Dipteryx odorata Aubl Willd (Cumaru) no Oeste do Pará. Adv. For. Sci. 2020, 7, 1171–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Capucho, H.L.V.; Silva, A.F.d.S.; Rebelo, A.G.d.M.; Pauletto, D.; Silva, A.R. Phenology of Dipteryx odorata and Dipteryx punctata in agroforestry systems in the eastern Amazon. Amaz. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2021, 64, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  18. Román-Dañobeytia, F.; Cabanillas, F.; Lefebvre, D.; Farfan, J.; Alferez, J.; Polo-Villanueva, F.; Llacsahuanga, J.; Vega, C.M.; Velasquez, M.; Corvera, R.; et al. Survival and early growth of 51 tropical tree species in areas degraded by artisanal gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon. Ecol. Eng. 2021, 159, 106097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. da Mota, C.G.; Pauletto, D.; Capucho, H.L.V.; da Silva, S.U.P.; Ponte, M.X. O cultivo do cumaru como alternativa econômica para agricultores familiares: Estudo de caso na região oeste do Pará. Res. Soc. Dev. 2022, 11, e46511326732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Melo, R.R.; Dacroce, J.M.F.; Junior, F.R.; Lisboa, G.d.S.; França, L.C.d.J. Lumber yield of four native forest species of the Amazon Region. Floresta E Ambiente 2019, 26, e20160311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. de Sousa, B.C.M.; de Castro, S.P.; Lourido, K.A.; Kasper, A.A.M.; Paulino, G.d.S.; Delarmelina, C.; Duarte, M.C.T.; Sartoratto, A.; Vieira, T.A.; Lustosa, D.C.; et al. Identification of Coumarins and Antimicrobial Potential of Ethanolic Extracts of Dipteryx odorata and Dipteryx punctata. Molecules 2022, 27, 5837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Campos, J.C.C.; Leite, H.G. Mensuração Florestal: Perguntas e Respostas, 5th ed.; Editora UFV: Viçosa, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. Binoti, D.H.B.; Da Binoti, M.L.M.S.; Leite, H.G.; Silva, A. Redução dos custos em inventário de povoamentos equiâneos. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Agrar. 2013, 8, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lopes, L.S.S.; Rode, R.; Pauletto, D.; Baloneque, D.D.; dos Santos, F.G.; Silva, A.R.; Binoti, D.H.B.; Leite, H.G. Uso de regressão e redes neurais artificiais na estimativa do volume de Khaya ivorensis. Rev. Ciência Madeira—RCM 2020, 11, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Phillips, O.L.; Brienen, R.J.W. Carbon uptake by mature Amazon forests has mitigated Amazon nations carbon emissions. Carbon Balance Manag. 2017, 12, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Heinrich, V.H.A.; Dalagnol, R.; Cassol, H.L.G.; Rosan, T.M.; de Almeida, C.T.; Silva Junior, C.H.L.; Campanharo, W.A.; House, J.I.; Sitch, S.; Hales, T.C.; et al. Large Carbon Sink Potential of Secondary Forests in the Brazilian Amazon to Mitigate Climate Change. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Araujo, E.C.G.; Sanquetta, C.R.; Dalla Corte, A.P.; Pelissari, A.L.; Orso, G.A.; Silva, T.C. Global Review and State-of-the-Art of Biomass and Carbon Stock in the Amazon. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 331, 117251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA). ENREDD+ Estratégia Nacional para Redução das Emissões Provenientes do Desmatamento e da Degradação Florestal, Conservação dos Estoques de Carbono Florestal, Manejo Sustentável de Florestas e Aumento de Estoques de Carbono Florestal. 2016. Available online: http://redd.mma.gov.br/en/redd-and-brazil-s-ndc (accessed on 7 May 2023).
  29. Romero, F.M.B.; Jacovine, L.A.G.; Ribeiro, S.C.; Neto, J.A.F.; Ferrante, L.; da Rocha, S.J.S.S.; Torres, C.M.M.E.; Junior, V.T.M.d.M.; Gaspar, R.d.O.; Velasquez, S.I.S.; et al. Stocks of carbon in logs and timber products from forest management in the southwestern Amazon. Forests 2020, 11, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Isinkaralar, O.; Isinkaralar, K.; Yilmaz, D. Climate-related spatial reduction risk of agricultural lands on the Mediterranean coast in Türkiye and scenario-based modelling of urban growth. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 25, 13199–13217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Isinkaralar, O. Bioclimatic comfort in urban planning and modeling spatial change during 2020–2100 according to climate change scenarios in Kocaeli, Türkiye. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 7775–7786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zilli, M.; Scarabello, M.; Soterroni, A.C.; Valin, H.; Mosnier, A.; Leclère, D.; Havlík, P.; Kraxner, F.; Lopes, M.A.; Ramos, F.M. The impact of climate change on Brazil’s agriculture. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 139384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Medeiros, R.A.; de Paiva, H.N.; Nogueira, G.S.; Leite, H.G. Planejamento de Experimentos Com Espécies Florestais, 1st ed.; Editora UFV: Viçosa, Brazil, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lima, Q.T.; Cunha, T.A.; Amaro, M.A.; Figueiredo, E.O.; Parente, P.R.F. Volume estimate for three timber species with commercial interest from the diameter of the stump. Floresta 2021, 51, 776–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fetzer, D.E.F.; Kanda, L.R.S.; Xavier, L.A.; Cruz, P.N.; Errico, M.; Corazza, M.L. Lipids and coumarin extraction from cumaru seeds (Dipteryx odorata) using sequential supercritical CO2+solvent and pressurized etanol. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2022, 188, 105688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Moraes, M.L.L.; Silva, S.A.; Silva, H.D.T. Experimental mixture design as a tool to evaluate coumarin (1,2-benzopyrone) extraction from Dipteryx odorata seeds. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2022, 210, 114586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lameira, M.K.d.S.; Silva, H.K.M.; Gomes, K.M.A.; Cândido, A.C.T.F.; Martorano, L.G.; Ribeiro, R.B.d.S.; Silva, A.R.; Gama, J.R.V. Capacidade produtiva de Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd. em um sistema de produção de pecuária integrada no Baixo Amazonas. Bras. Product. 2022, 19, 56–65. [Google Scholar]
  38. Alvares, C.A.; Stape, J.L.; Sentelhas, P.C.; Gonçalves, J.L.d.M.; Sparovek, G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol. Z. 2013, 22, 711–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Martorano, L.G.; Soares, W.B.; Moraes, J.R.d.S.C.d.; Nascimento, W.; Aparecido, L.E.d.O.; Villa, P.M. Climatology of air temperature in Belterra: Thermal regulation ecosystem services provided by the Tapajós National Forest in the amazon. Rev. Bras. De Meteorol. 2021, 36, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brasil, E.C.; Cravo, M.S.; Viégas, I.J.M. Recomendações de adubação para o estado do Pará. In Recomendações de Calagem e Adubação Para o Estado do Pará; EMBRAPA: Brasília, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  41. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Mapa de Vegetação do Brasil; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2004.
  42. Baloneque, D.D.; Pauletto, D.; Lopes, L.S.S.; Rode, R.; Oliveira, T.G.d.S. Variáveis morfométricas de quatro espécies florestais em sistema silvipastoril no município de Belterra, Pará. Res. Soc. Dev. 2022, 11, e43511326761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chave, J.; Andalo, C.; Brown, S.; Cairns, M.A.; Chambers, J.Q.; Eamus, D.; Fölster, H.; Fromard, F.; Higuchi, N.; Kira, T.; et al. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 2005, 145, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Araújo, S.O.; Vital, B.R.; Oliveira, B.; Carneiro, A.C.O.; Lourenço, A.; Pereira, H. Physical and mechanical properties of heat treated wood from Aspidosperma populifolium, Dipteryx odorata and Mimosa scabrella. Maderas. Cienc. Tecnol. 2016, 18, 143–156. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zau, M.D.L.; De Vasconcelos, R.P.; Giacon, V.M.; Lahr, F.A.R. Chemical, physical and mechanical properties of particleboard produced with Amazon wood waste—Cumaru (Dipteryx odorata)—and Castor oil based polyurethane adhesive. Polimeros 2014, 24, 726–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Romero, F.M.B.; Jacovine, L.A.G.; Ribeiro, S.C.; Torres, C.M.M.E.; da Silva, L.F.; Gaspar, R.d.O.; da Rocha, S.J.S.S.; Staudhammer, C.L.; Fearnside, P.M. Allometric equations for volume, biomass, and carbon in commercial stems harvested in a managed forest in the southwestern amazon: A case study. Forests 2020, 11, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. de Souza, A.L.; Soares, C.P.B. Florestas Nativas: Estrutura, Dinâmica e Manejo, 1st ed.; Editora UFV: Viçosa, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  48. Santos, A.C.d.A.; Fardin, L.P.; de Oliveira Neto, R.R. Teste de hipótese em análise de regressão. In Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1st ed.; Novas Edições Acadêmicas: São Paulo, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  49. Binkley, D.; Stape, J.L.; Bauerle, W.L.; Ryan, M.G. Explaining growth of individual trees: Light interception and efficiency of light use by Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 1704–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wink, C.; Monteiro, J.S.; Reinert, D.J.; Liberalesso, E.E. Parâmetros da copa e a sua relação com o diâmetro e altura das árvores de eucalipto em diferentes idades. Sci. For./For. Sci. 2012, 40, 57–67. [Google Scholar]
  51. Li, Q.; Liu, Z.; Jin, G. Impacts of stand density on tree crown structure and biomass: A global meta-analysis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 326, 109181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. de Oliveira, T.M.; Madi, J.P.S.; Cerqueira, C.L.; Millikan, P.H.K.; Chaves, M.P.d.L.; Carvalho, S.d.P.C. Relações morfométricas para árvores de Tectona grandis. Adv. For. Sci. 2018, 5, 461–465. [Google Scholar]
  53. Resende, R.T.; Soares, A.A.V.; Forrester, D.I.; Marcatti, G.E.; dos Santos, A.R.; Takahashi, E.K.; e Silva, F.F.; Grattapaglia, D.; Resende, M.D.V.; Leite, H.G. Environmental uniformity, site quality and tree competition interact to determine stand productivity of clonal Eucalyptus. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 410, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sharma, R.P.; Vacek, Z.; Vacek, S. Individual tree crown width models for Norway spruce and European beech in Czech Republic. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 366, 208–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, Q.; Duan, G.; Liu, Q.; Ye, Q.; Sharma, R.P.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H.; Fu, L. Estimating crown width in degraded forest: A two-level nonlinear mixed-effects crown width model for Dacrydium pierrei and Podocarpus imbricatus in tropical China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 497, 119486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ricken, P.; Hess, A.F.; de Mattos, P.P.; Braz, E.M.; Nakajima, N.Y.; Hosokawa, R.T. Morfometria de Araucaria angustifolia em diferentes altitudes no Sul do Brasil. Pesqui. Florest. Bras. 2020, 40, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chai, G.; Zheng, Y.; Lei, L.; Yao, Z.; Chen, M.; Zhang, X. A novel solution for extracting individual tree crown parameters in high-density plantation considering inter-tree growth competition using terrestrial close-range scanning and photogrammetry technology. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 209, 107849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Forrester, D.I.; Ammer, C.; Annighöfer, P.J.; Barbeito, I.; Bielak, K.; Bravo-Oviedo, A.; Coll, L.; del Río, M.; Drössler, L.; Heym, M.; et al. Effects of crown architecture and stand structure on light absorption in mixed and monospecific Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests along a productivity and climate gradient through Europe. J. Ecol. 2018, 106, 746–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qin, Y.; Wu, B.; Lei, X.; Feng, L. Prediction of tree crown width in natural mixed forests using deep learning algorithm. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mildrexler, D.J.; Berner, L.T.; Law, B.E.; Birdsey, R.A.; Moomaw, W.R. Large Trees Dominate Carbon Storage in Forests East of the Cascade Crest in the United States Pacific Northwest. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2020, 3, 594274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shoda, T.; Imanishi, J.; Shibata, S. Growth characteristics and growth equations of the diameter at breast height using tree ring measurements of street trees in Kyoto City, Japan. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 49, 126627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qin, Y.; He, X.; Lei, X.; Feng, L.; Zhou, Z.; Lu, J. Tree size inequality and competition effects on nonlinear mixed effects crown width model for natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forest in northeast China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 518, 120291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hu, L.; Xu, X.; Wang, J.; Xu, H. Individual tree crown width detection from unmanned aerial vehicle images using a revised local transect method. Ecol. Inform. 2023, 75, 102086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Feldpausch, T.R.; Banin, L.; Phillips, O.L.; Baker, T.R.; Lewis, S.L.; Quesada, C.A.; Affum-Baffoe, K.; Arets, E.J.M.M.; Berry, N.J.; Bird, M.; et al. Height-diameter allometry of tropical forest trees. Biogeosciences 2011, 8, 1081–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nascimento, R.G.M.; Vanclay, J.K.; Filho, A.F.; Machado, S.D.A.; Ruschel, A.R.; Hiramatsu, N.A.; de Freitas, L.J.M. The tree height estimated by non-power models on volumetric models provides reliable predictions of wood volume: The Amazon species height modelling issue. Trees For. People 2020, 2, 100028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Leites, L.P.; Zubizarreta-Gerendiain, A.; Robinson, A.P. Modeling mensurational relationships of plantation-grown loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in Uruguay. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 289, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gujarati, D.N.; Porter, D.C. Econometria Básica, 5th ed.; AMGH Editora: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  68. Hair, J.F., Jr.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; Blanck, W.C. Análise Multivariada de Dados, 5th ed.; Bookman: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  69. Voss, D.S. Multicollinearity. In Encyclopedia of Social Measurement; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; Volume 2, pp. 1–3000. [Google Scholar]
  70. de Oliveira, M.L.R.; Leite, H.G.; Garcia, S.L.R.; Campos, J.C.C.; Soares, C.P.B.; Santana, R.C. Estimação do volume de árvores de clones de eucalipto pelo método da similaridade de perfis. Rev. Árvore 2009, 33, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Reis, T.; Silva, S.; Junior, I.T.; Leite, R.; Taquetti, M.; Atanazio, K.; Fardin, L.; Cruz, J.; Leite, H. Assessing alternatives for growth and yield modelling in eucalypt stands. South. For. 2022, 84, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gomes, G.S.L.; Neto, S.N.d.O.; Leite, H.G.; da Silva, M.L.; Lopes, L.S.d.S.; Said Schettini, B.L. Relationships between spacing, productivity and profitability of eucalypt plantations in a small rural property in south-eastern Brazil. South. For. 2022, 84, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Araujo, H.J.B. Inventário florestal a 100% em pequenas áreas sob manejo florestal madeireiro. Acta Amaz. 2006, 36, 447–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wu, X.; Zhou, S.; Xu, A.; Chen, B. Passive measurement method of tree diameter at breast height using a smartphone. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 163, 104875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Curto, R.D.A.; Pinto, M.F.; Wink, C.; de Araújo, E.J.G.; Kohler, S.V. Aplicativos e smartphones para mensuração da altura de árvores em plantio florestal. Pesqui. Florest. Bras. 2022, 42, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chisholm, R.A.; Muller-Landau, H.C.; Abdul Rahman, K.; Bebber, D.P.; Bin, Y.; Bohlman, S.A.; Bourg, N.A.; Brinks, J.; Bunyavejchewin, S.; Butt, N.; et al. Scale-dependent relationships between tree species richness and ecosystem function in forests. J. Ecol. 2013, 101, 1214–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Castro-Izaguirre, N.; Chi, X.; Baruffol, M.; Tang, Z.; Ma, K.; Schmid, B.; Niklaus, P.A. Tree diversity enhances stand carbon storage but not leaf area in a subtropical forest. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sullivan, M.J.P.; Talbot, J.; Lewis, S.L.; Phillips, O.L.; Qie, L.; Begne, S.K.; Chave, J.; Cuni-Sanchez, A.; Hubau, W.; Lopez-Gonzalez, G.; et al. Diversity and carbon storage across the tropical forest biome. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 39102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, X.; Trogisch, S.; He, J.S.; Niklaus, P.A.; Bruelheide, H.; Tang, Z.; Erfmeier, A.; Scherer-Lorenzen, M.; Pietsch, K.A.; Yang, B.; et al. Tree species richness increases ecosystem carbon storage in subtropical forests. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 285, 20182090. [Google Scholar]
  80. Celentano, D.; Rousseau, G.X.; Paixão, L.S.; Lourenço, F.; Cardozo, E.G.; Rodrigues, T.O.; Silva, H.R.; Medina, J.; Sousa, T.M.C.; Rocha, A.E.; et al. Carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling in agroforestry systems on degraded soils of Eastern Amazon, Brazil. Agrofor. Syst. 2020, 94, 1781–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, Q.; Lu, D.; Keller, M.; Dos-Santos, M.N.; Bolfe, E.L.; Feng, Y.; Wang, C. Modeling and Mapping Agroforestry Aboveground Biomass in the Brazilian Amazon Using Airborne Lidar Data. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lenci, L.H.V.; Tsukamoto Filho, A.A.; Weber, O.L.S.; Honoré, E.A.D.; Caldeira, S.F.; Bertolini, J. Estoque de carbono da biomassa arbórea, serapilheira e solo em sistemas agroflorestais com seringueira. Rev. Bras. Ciências Agrárias 2022, 17, e2406. [Google Scholar]
  83. Neuman, A.D.; Belcher, K.W. The contribution of carbon-based payments to wetland conservation compensation on agricultural landscapes. Agric. Syst. 2011, 104, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Manzatto, C.V.; Skorupa, L.A.; de Araújo, L.S.; Vicente, L.E.; Assad, E.D. Estimativas de redução de emissões de gases de efeito estufa pela adoção de sistemas ILPF no Brasil. In Sistemas de Integração Lavoura-Pecuária-Floresta no Brasil: Estratégias Regionais de Transferência de Tecnologia, Avaliação da Adoção e de Impactos; EMBRAPA: Brasília, Brazil, 2019; pp. 400–424. [Google Scholar]
  85. Cardozo, E.G.; Celentano, D.; Rousseau, G.X.; e Silva, H.R.; Muchavisoy, H.M.; Gehring, C. Agroforestry systems recover tree carbon stock faster than natural succession in Eastern Amazon, Brazil. Agrofor. Syst. 2022, 96, 941–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Müller, M.D.; Fernandes, E.N.; Castro, C.R.T.; Paciullo, D.S.C.; Alves, F.D.F. Estimativa de Acúmulo de Biomassa e Carbono em Sistema Agrossilvipastoril na Zona da Mata Mineira. Pesqui. Florest. Bras. 2010, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. dos Santos, S.R.M.; Miranda, I.d.S.; Tourinho, M.M. Análise florística e estrutural de sistemas agroflorestais das várzeas do rio Juba, Cametá, Pará. Acta Amaz. 2004, 34, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Montagnini, F.; Nair, P.K.R. Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 2004, 61–62, 281–295. [Google Scholar]
  89. BRASIL. Lei nº 14.119, de 13 de Janeiro de 2021. Institui a Política Nacional de Pagamento por SA; e Altera as Leis nos 8.212, de 24 de Julho de 1991, 8.629, de 25 de Fevereiro de 1993, e 6.015, de 31 de Dezembro de 1973, Para Adequá-Las à Nova Política. Available online: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2021/lei/L14119.htm (accessed on 24 June 2023).
Figure 1. Location map of the municipalities.
Figure 1. Location map of the municipalities.
Forests 14 02167 g001
Figure 2. Illustrative scheme of the tree sampling procedure carried out in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Figure 2. Illustrative scheme of the tree sampling procedure carried out in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Forests 14 02167 g002
Figure 3. Significant Pearson correlation coefficients at 95% probability between dendrometric variables of individuals of Dipteryx spp. in six stands in the Western Amazon.
Figure 3. Significant Pearson correlation coefficients at 95% probability between dendrometric variables of individuals of Dipteryx spp. in six stands in the Western Amazon.
Forests 14 02167 g003aForests 14 02167 g003b
Figure 4. Dispersion between observed total height and estimated total height by simple and multiple linear regression models for six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Figure 4. Dispersion between observed total height and estimated total height by simple and multiple linear regression models for six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Forests 14 02167 g004
Figure 5. Dispersion between observed crown diameter and estimated crown diameter by simple and multiple linear regression models for six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Figure 5. Dispersion between observed crown diameter and estimated crown diameter by simple and multiple linear regression models for six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Forests 14 02167 g005aForests 14 02167 g005b
Table 1. Description of the characteristics of the six populations of Dipteryx spp. researched in the Eastern Amazon.
Table 1. Description of the characteristics of the six populations of Dipteryx spp. researched in the Eastern Amazon.
Forest StandCityAge (Years)Spacing (m)Species Cultivated/Raised in Consortium *
HomogeneousAlenquer106 × 6-
AFS 1Alenquer65.5 × 4.5Ab
AFS 2Belterra78 × 6C; Aç; Gr; Bn; P
AFS 3Alenquer810 × 8.5Lm
AFS 4Mojuí dos Campos94 × 8Lj
SilvopastoralBelterra1110 × 10Bovines
* Ab: Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merril); C: Cupuaçu (Theobroma grandiflorum (Willd. ex Spreng.) K. Schum.); Aç: Açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart); Gr: Soursop (Annona muricata L.); Bn: Banana (Musa spp.); P: Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.); Lm: Lemon (Citrus limon L.); Lj: Orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osb.).
Table 2. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) of the data collected in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) of the data collected in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Forest Standnht (m)hc (m)cc (m)dbh (cm)dc (m)
Homogeneous257.04 ± 1.431.9 ± 0.734.48 ± 1.348.79 ± 2.864.1 ± 1.26
AFS 1258.08 ± 0.780.64 ± 0.476.03 ± 0.938.88 ± 1.515.15 ± 0.77
AFS 2259.68 ± 1.942.78 ± 1.16.22 ± 2.0311.95 ± 3.314.7 ± 1.57
AFS 3255.26 ± 1.41.26 ± 0.842.74 ± 1.426.18 ± 2.783.15 ± 1.54
AFS 4259.62 ± 1.380.7 ± 0.357.83 ± 1.214.09 ± 2.67.25 ± 0.76
AFS 1 and 4508.85 ± 1.350.67 ± 0.416.93 ± 1.411.48 ± 3.366.2 ± 1.3
Silvopastoral5014.35 ± 4.555.45 ± 2.5810.45 ± 3.7716.57 ± 5.317.97 ± 3.16
Total sample1759.77 ± 4.22.6 ± 2.456.88 ± 3.5611.86 ± 5.225.76 ± 2.68
Table 3. Estimated coefficients and fit statistics of linear and multiple regression models for total height (ht) in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Table 3. Estimated coefficients and fit statistics of linear and multiple regression models for total height (ht) in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
ModelSystem β 0 β 1 β 2 R2adj. S yx F
l n ( h t ) = β 0 + β 1 l n ( d b h ) + ε Homogeneous0.857056 *0.50536 * 0.5892.50034.556
AFS 11.382878 *0.32745 * 0.3581.13128.310
AFS 20.839736 *0.57845 * 0.6962.92473.442
AFS 30.857707 *0.446987 * 0.6982.15935.696
AFS 41.382878 *0.32745 * 0.3581.13128.310
Silvopastoral0.762366 *0.671219 * 0.51623.59950.384
General model−0.584886 *1.010811 * 0.7139.497359.300
l n h t = β 0 + β 1 l n d b h + β 2 l n d c + ε Homogeneous0.921099 *0.353371 *0.19068 ns0.6171.13920.344
AFS 11.303266 *0.219919 *0.187483 ns0.3781.12915.880
AFS 21.0934 *0.370159 *0.172467 ns0.7671.11740.406
AFS 30.922075 *0.204625 ns0.33709 *0.7081.17030.078
AFS 41.303266 *0.219919 *0.187483 ns0.3781.12915.880
Silvopastoral1.030821 *0.251216 ns0.447024 *0.6361.26543.872
General model0.617836 *0.458415 *0.300522 *0.7601.231275.800
β n : coefficients estimated by the model; R2adj.: adjusted coefficient of determination; S yx : standard error of estimated total height in meters; F: calculated F-value; *: significant coefficient at 5% (alpha = 0.05) according to the t-test; ns: non-significant coefficient at 5% (alpha = 0.05) according to the t-test.
Table 4. Estimated coefficients and fit statistics of linear and multiple regression models for crown diameter (dc) in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Table 4. Estimated coefficients and fit statistics of linear and multiple regression models for crown diameter (dc) in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
ModelSistem β 0 β 1 β 2 R2adj. S yx F
l n ( d c ) = β 0 + β 1 l n ( d b h ) + ε Homogeneous−0.335868 ns0.797088 * 0.5071.28225.666
AFS 10.42463 *0.57355 * 0.5441.16159.440
AFS 2−1.470793 *1.207716 * 0.7931.23692.693
AFS 3−0.190952 ns0.718981 * 0.5731.36433.147
AFS 40.42463 *0.57355 * 0.5441.16159.440
Silvopastoral−0.600536 ns0.939553 * 0.5821.39069.203
General model−0.4364 *0.8743 * 0.6991.331404.400
l n d c = β 0 + β 1 l n d b h + β 2 l n h t + ε Homogeneous−0.883262 ns0.474319 ns0.638691 ns0.5471.26915.503
AFS 10.045817 ns0.483848 *0.273933 ns0.5581.15831.950
AFS 2−1.970995 *0.863153 *0.595666 ns0.8051.22850.667
AFS 3−0.996543 *0.299154 ns0.939239 *0.6951.30028.293
AFS 40.045817 ns0.483848 *0.273933 ns0.5581.15831.950
Silvopastoral−1.086688 *0.511525 *0.637688 *0.6951.32556.760
General model−0.674451 *0.521555 *0.489129 *0.7411.303250.500
βn: coefficients estimated by the model; R2adj.: adjusted coefficient of determination; S yx : standard error of the total height estimate in meters; F: calculated F-value; *: significant coefficient at 5% (alpha = 0.05) according to the t-test; ns: non-significant coefficient at 5% (alpha = 0.05) according to the t-test.
Table 5. Volume and aboveground biomass per tree and per area, carbon stored above ground, and accumulated carbon sequestration per year in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
Table 5. Volume and aboveground biomass per tree and per area, carbon stored above ground, and accumulated carbon sequestration per year in six stands of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon.
SistemN ha−1 v V w WCCO2CO2 yr−1
(m3 tree−1)(m3 ha−1)(kg tree−1)(t ha−1)(t C ha−1)(t CO2 ha−1)(t CO2 ha−1 yr−1)
Homogeneous2780.02527.016350.82014.1287.06425.9252.592
AFS 14050.025410.289945.12118.2749.13733.5335.589
AFS 22090.047910.0087107.73922.51711.25941.3205.903
AFS 31180.01631.928823.6612.7921.3965.1230.640
AFS 43130.057818.0926154.79248.45024.22588.9069.878
Silvopastoral1000.126112.6057267.13526.71413.35749.0194.456
N ha−1: number of trees per hectare; v : individual volume with bark in m3 per tree; V: volume per area in m3 ha−1; w : individual aboveground biomass in kg per tree; W: aboveground biomass per area in t ha−1; C: total carbon per unit area in t C ha−1; CO2: carbon dioxide per area in t CO2 ha−1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Sousa Lopes, L.S.; Pauletto, D.; Gomes, E.S.C.; da Silva, Á.F.; de Sousa Oliveira, T.G.; da Silva, J.A.G.; Baloneque, D.D.; Martorano, L.G. Dendrometric Relationships and Biomass in Commercial Plantations of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon. Forests 2023, 14, 2167. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14112167

AMA Style

de Sousa Lopes LS, Pauletto D, Gomes ESC, da Silva ÁF, de Sousa Oliveira TG, da Silva JAG, Baloneque DD, Martorano LG. Dendrometric Relationships and Biomass in Commercial Plantations of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon. Forests. 2023; 14(11):2167. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14112167

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Sousa Lopes, Lucas Sérgio, Daniela Pauletto, Emeli Susane Costa Gomes, Ádria Fernandes da Silva, Thiago Gomes de Sousa Oliveira, Jéssica Aline Godinho da Silva, Diego Damázio Baloneque, and Lucieta Guerreiro Martorano. 2023. "Dendrometric Relationships and Biomass in Commercial Plantations of Dipteryx spp. in the Eastern Amazon" Forests 14, no. 11: 2167. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14112167

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop