Next Article in Journal
Linking Microbial Decomposition to Dissolved Organic Matter Composition in the Revegetation of the Red Soil Erosion Area
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Variation Patterns in Xylem Vessels and Parenchyma Cells and Their Association with Tree Evolution
Previous Article in Journal
End-to-End Learning for Visual Navigation of Forest Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Response of Tracheid Structure Characteristics and Lignin Distribution of Taxodium Hybrid Zhongshanshan to External Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/f14020269
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Organ and Leaf Habit on the Secondary Xylem Anatomy Variation across 15 Species from Brazilian Cerrado

by
Rafaella Dutra
1,2,*,
Anselmo Nogueira
3,
Sergio Rossi
1,
Larissa Chacon Dória
4,
Valentina Buttò
1,5 and
Carmen Regina Marcati
2
1
Laboratoire sur les Écosystèmes Terrestres Boréaux, Département des Sciences Fondamentales, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555 Boulevard de l’Université, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada
2
Laboratório de Anatomia da Madeira, Departamento de Ciência Florestal, Solos e Ambiente, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil
3
Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo 09210-580, SP, Brazil
4
Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13038-970, SP, Brazil
5
Forest Research Institute, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 5E4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(2), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020269
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 28 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wood Anatomy and Evaluation of Wood Structures and Their Modifications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Xylem is a complex tissue connecting the organs of plants and it performs multiple functions, including water transport, mechanical support, and storage. Because of the interaction between structure and function, xylem anatomy can provide useful information about its role in plant strategies. However, knowledge of how xylem anatomical traits change across organs and species functional groups is still limited. Here, we tested the role of different plant organs (stem and roots) and leaf habits (deciduous, semi-deciduous, and evergreen) on xylem anatomy variation across 15 woody species from the Brazilian Cerrado. Vessels, fibers, and parenchyma traits were measured on 45 individuals sampled in 2014 in Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. Our results revealed a higher parenchyma fraction and less fiber fraction in roots than in stems across species. Differences in wood anatomical traits between organs were mainly species-specific in parenchyma traits rather than vessel and fiber traits. Across leaf habits, only the root ray fraction was higher in evergreen species compared to deciduous species. These findings highlight a potential role of organs and leaf habits in xylem storage across Cerrado woody species.

1. Introduction

The emergence of secondary xylem (i.e., wood) is a milestone in ensuring the dominance and longevity of plants in terrestrial ecosystems [1]. As part of the vascular system connecting the components of the plant body, xylem plays multiple functions, such as long-distance water transport, mechanical support, and storage. For most angiosperms, these functions are performed by different cell types: vessels conduct water, fibers provide mechanical support, and the parenchyma (rays and axial) stores nutrients and water. Considering such complexity, dividing the xylem area amongst different cell types could result in functional trade-offs, enhancing some functions over others [2,3]. Thus, the enhancement of certain xylem functions due to xylem cell partition allows plants to maximize fitness and survival [4]. Wood anatomical traits, therefore, provide a detailed insight into tissue properties and functionality as well as ecological and adaptive species strategies [5]. However, critical questions about how wood anatomy changes across organs and species functional groups (e.g., leaf habit) still awaits a clear answer.
Explanations of the wood functionality based on anatomy are well made at the stem and branch level [6,7,8,9,10], while variation in belowground plant traits remains poorly quantified. However, considering that the xylem is a functional unit that integrates plant compartments, inferring wood traits from a single or aerial organs may obscure the implications of wood functionality at the whole-plant level [5]. Therefore, how different plants’ functional requirements above- and belowground reflect on xylem anatomy remains challenging [11,12]. Xylem traits’ variability is expected to mirror the demands for efficient water transport, storage, and mechanical support of roots and stems. For example, wider conduits indicate greater hydraulic conductivity [13] and are often observed in roots given the need for efficient water transport from the soil to leaves [14,15]. A higher amount of parenchyma tissue also implies storage demand and less investment in support cells in roots due to the soil matrix surrounding underground organs [16,17,18]. By contrast, the xylem profile tendency in the stem, considering the bottom–top direction, shows thicker cell walls and narrower cell lumen diameter to deal with the expected needs for mechanical support (i.e., canopy support and wind load breaking resistance) [11,19] or water transport failure resistance under drought-induced tension [20,21], or both requirements simultaneously.
Under different conditions, species can have leaf habits responding to seasonal environmental filters, with varying traits linked to water and carbon use and acquisition strategies [22,23]. Thus, leaf permanence or fall are potentially connected to xylem anatomy [24,25]. Plants can be classified into functional groups according to leaf habit senescence, as deciduous (i.e., shedding leaves at the peak of the dry season), intermediate such as semi-deciduous plants (i.e., partial shedding in the dry season), and evergreen (i.e., retaining leaves throughout the year) [26]. Compared to evergreens, deciduous species exhibit a larger vessel diameter [24], enhancing efficient water transport and photosynthetic leaf capacity [27,28]. However, larger vessel diameters imply greater vulnerability to hydraulic failure via embolism [29]. Therefore, evergreen species tend to show a hydraulic system that better avoids embolism than deciduous species. In addition, due to the higher demand for non-structural carbohydrate allocation during the regrowth period [30], higher parenchyma fractions are expected for carbohydrate storage in species with a deciduousness strategy. Although studies between deciduous and evergreen indicate differences in xylem anatomical traits linked to water transport [7,23,24,31,32], how leaf habit explains xylem anatomy variation beyond these classifications and in the view of storage function is not well understood.
Here, we investigated the role of plant organs (i.e., stem and roots) and leaf habits (i.e., deciduous, semi-deciduous and evergreen) on wood anatomy variation in a functional perspective. For this, we collected woody samples from 15 species in the Brazilian Cerrado (Neotropical savanna), where plants‘ growth and survival are driven by water seasonality, fire dynamics and soil fertility [33]. We hypothesized that (1) there is a higher investment in water transport efficiency (i.e., larger vessels) and storage (i.e., higher parenchyma amount), and less investment in support (i.e., fiber fraction and wall thickness) in roots compared to the stem; and (2) evergreen species have embolism-resistant water transport (i.e., narrow vessels, higher vessel density and thicker fibers) and less investment in storage (i.e., parenchyma amount) than deciduousness species strategy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study site and sampling

The study was conducted in Estancia Santa Catarina Private Reserve, Botucatu (São Paulo State, Brazil) (22°54′51″ S, 48°30′13″ W). The site is located in the Cerrado sensu stricto (i.e., Brazilian savanna), with vegetation composed of short and sparse woody species [34]. The soils are sandy and acid, with low organic matter and high aluminum content (Departamento de Solos e Recursos Ambientais, UNESP Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil). The area has a mean annual temperature of 21 °C and a seasonal precipitation pattern of 1507 mm from September to April and 50 mm from May to August.
We selected 15 dominant species based on a previous floristic inventory in the area and covering a wide phylogenetic diversity (Figure 1, Table 1). In addition, all species have diffuse-porous wood except Aegiphila verticillata Vell., with semi-porous rings. We sampled the stem and root from three mature individuals per species, at 60 cm aboveground and a depth of 15–30 cm from the root collar. Samples were collected in June–July 2015, when the vascular cambium is dormant [35].

2.2. Wood Anatomy Measurements

Samples were cut in transversal and tangential sections 15–22 μm thick with a sliding microtome (Reichert Om E, Vienna, Austria). Sections were stained in safranin and astra blue, dehydrated in ethanol, and mounted on permanent slides with synthetic resin (Entellan®, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). To measure individual cellular elements, samples were reduced in small fragments and placed with hydrogen peroxide and glacial acetic acid (1:1) in an oven at 60 °C for 24 h. The resulting material were stained with safranin and mounted on semi-permanent slides with 50% glycerin. Measurements were performed using light microscopy (Axioscop 40 Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with Axiocam MRc camera (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and Axiovision software (Version 4.9.1, White Plains, NY, USA). Anatomical wood traits were measured with ImageJ 2.0 [36]. All measurements were performed on one cross-section, except for ray density that was measured on tangential sections, and fiber features from individualized elements for each sample [37,38]. In total, we analyzed 1335 vessels (660 in roots, and 675 in the stem), 1200 fibers (630 in roots, and 570 in the stem) for fiber lumen diameter, and 1260 fibers (630 in both organs) for fiber wall thickness. The xylem traits of each sample were averaged to determine individual values. Vessel and ray densities (number/area) were estimated in 1 mm2 and 1 mm−1, respectively, across 10 fields. Fiber lumen diameter and wall thickness (µm) were calculated on 30 individual fibers. Hydraulic vessel diameter (Dh) was calculated based on the formula (Σd4/n)1/4, where d refers to vessel diameter, estimated from vessel lumen area, and n refers to vessel number [13]. The vessel lumen area was measured in 30 vessels per individual. The vessels, fibers, and parenchyma fractions were quantified over an area of 1 mm² [39].

2.3. Data Analysis

To test for differences between organs, we used linear mixed models (LMM) on anatomical wood traits (response variables) as a function of organs (root; stem) (fixed effects) across species, in which the individuals nested in species were considered as random term in the models. For each species separately, we also compared anatomical wood traits between organs using Student’s t-test, the Welch t-test or the Mann–Witney U-test according to data normality checked a priori using the Shapiro–Wilk test and histograms. Plant height and organ diameter size were also included as fixed factors due to their potential allometric effect on the anatomical wood traits [40,41,42].
To test for differences between leaf habits, we used LMM on anatomical wood traits (response variables) as a function of leaf habits (deciduous; semi-deciduous; evergreen) (fixed factor) for each organ separately. Species was considered as a random term in the models. A Bonferroni post hoc test was applied for multiple comparisons among leaf habits, respectively.
All mixed models were compared by the likelihood ratio test. The normality and homoscedasticity of the residuals were checked by visual inspection [43]. When needed, data were transformed by square root or logarithm to meet the normality or homogeneity of variances. Analyses were performed in R (Version 4.0.5, Vienna, Austria) [44]. The lme4 package [45] was used to fit LMM, and the lmerTest package [46] and emmeans package [47] were used to test the fixed effects significance of models and for multiple comparisons, respectively.

3. Results

Wood anatomical traits differed slightly between root and stem across species (Figure 2, Table 2). On average, the hydraulic vessel diameter was similar between organs (root: 76.32 ± 6.25 µm vs stem: 70.74 ± 5.40 µm) (Figure 2A), with highest values observed in roots of Diospyros lasiocalyx and Eriotheca gracilipes, about 5.5-fold higher than the lowest values observed in both organs of Erythroxylum buxos (Figure 3A). When contrasted organs within species, Leptolobium elegans showed larger hydraulic vessel diameter in the stem (root: 47.48 ± 6.34 µm vs stem: 76.55 ± 5.89 µm; t = −3.36, df = 4, p = 0.03, Figure 3A). Vessel density showed the largest variability across organs, ranging between 1.70 and 193.63 n° mm2 in roots and between 3 and 164.70 n° mm2 in the stem; no difference, on average, was observed between organs (Table 2). Within species, we detected a higher density of vessels in stems in Couepia grandiflora (t = −3.15, df = 4, p = 0.03) and Roupala montana (t= −3.14, df = 4, p = 0.04) (Figure 3C). Fiber and parenchyma properties were less than about 1% divergent between roots and stems across species (Figure 2E,G,I). On another hand, both cell types features differed between organs at intraspecific level. Wider fiber lumen diameters were detected in the roots of C. grandiflora and stems of Myrcia guianensis (t = 3.48, df = 4, p = 0.02; t = −2.82, df = 4, p = 0.05, respectively) (Figure 3E). For fiber wall thickness, the higher values were found in stems of Annona crassiflora (t = −19.92, df = 2, p = 0.002) and in roots of Casearia sylvestris (t = 4.87, df = 4, p = 0.008) (Figure 3G). Compared to the stem, ray density was ca. 16% lower in the roots of C. sylvestris (t= −4.88, df = 4, p = 0.008, Figure 3I).
At the cell fraction level, both organs were composed mainly of total parenchyma fraction (root: 0.51; stem: 0.46), which varied about 7.5-fold in roots and 4-fold in stems (Figure 2F). The total parenchyma fraction was driven by the ray fraction (Figure 2H), and both fractions were larger in roots compared to stems across the studied species (p = 0.05; p = 0.0002, Table 2). C. sylvestris and Eriotheca gracilipes showed higher total parenchyma fraction in the roots than stems (Figure 3F). Ray fraction showed different patters between organs, with lower values in roots of A. crassiflora and Erythroxylum suberosum (t = −8.56, df = 4, p = 0.001; t = −3.36, df = 3, p = 0.05, respectively) and higher values in roots of C. sylvestris, Myrcia bella and M. guianensis (t = 2.86, df = 4, p = 0.05; t = 5.02, df = 4, p = 0.009; t = 5.02, df = 4, p = 0.007, respectively) (Figure 3H). In contrast, the fiber fraction was slightly greater in stems (0.38 ± 0.01) than in roots (0.32 ± 0.01) (p = 0.02, Table 2). Roots of A. crassiflora and stems of C. sylvestris showed higher fiber amounts (t = −3.18, df = 4, p = 0.04; t = 4, df = 4, p = 0.02, Figure 3D). Across species, no difference was detected in the vessel and axial parenchyma fractions in roots relative to stems (Table 2). The amount of vessels in the roots was higher in A. crassiflora and lower in M. guianensis and R. montana (t = 9.35, df = 4, p <0.0001; t = -4.38, df = 4, p = 0.02; t = -5.04, df = 4, p = 0.007, Figure 3B). Likewise, lower root axial parenchyma fraction was found in Caryocar brasiliense (root: 0.17 ± 0.003 vs stem: 0.20 ± 0.009; t = −2.98, df = 4, p = 0.04, Figure 3J).
Among leaf habits, a higher similarity was detected in wood anatomy for each organ (Figure 4, Table S1). From the 10 anatomical wood traits measured, only the ray fraction changed among leaf habits (F = 9.08, p = 0.003), with roots of evergreen species showing higher values than deciduous species (p = 0.04) (Figure 4H). Intermediate values were found in semi-deciduous species (Table S1). Across species, roots of Piptocarpha rotundifolia, R. montana and M. bella showed the highest ray amount, and the stem of L. elegans showed the lower (Figure 3H).
We also examined the potential influence of organ diameter and plant height on the anatomical traits. Vessel and ray densities as well as ray fraction were correlated with organ diameter (slope = −0.03, p = 0.04; slope = 0.02, p = 0.05; slope = 0.01, p = 0.04, respectively) (Table 2), but the relatively low slope estimates indicate no influence of organ diameter on either trait. No studied trait correlated with plant height (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Evaluating xylem anatomical traits variation between organs and functional plant groups is crucial to map the functional meaning of the complex xylem tissue, determining plant fitness and forest function. In this study, we identified shifts of anatomical xylem traits comparing different organs and leaf habits categories across 15 species from Cerrado. Overall, our results indicate that: (1) organs are related to storage and, to a lesser extent, support tissue variation; (2) contrasts in wood anatomical traits between organs are mainly species-specific in parenchyma traits than vessel and fiber traits; (3) at the organ level, divergences in root parenchyma amount are best explained by leaf habits. Collectively, these findings indicate that organ and leaf habit have a major role in wood storage across the species of Cerrado plants studied.

4.1. Xylem Anatomy Variation between Organs

Contrasting functional demands and environments of plant organs are expected to translate into xylem traits and functions. The higher amount of parenchyma (total and ray) and lower amount of fiber in roots than in stems across species confirmed our hypothesis that storage rather than mechanical support is emphasized in roots compared to stems. In agreement with previous studies [12,17,18], a greater amount of parenchyma indicates higher storage capacity in roots. In comparison, a greater amount of fiber in the stem indicates a requirement for mechanical support [19]. This pattern possibly reflect distinct biomechanical demands within the plant body and the microenvironment that surrounds the organs. Indeed, the soil matrix supports anchoring the plants, reducing the requirement for mechanical support tissues and favoring storage for roots compared to aerial organs such as stems [16]. Thus, our findings demonstrate that xylem parenchyma and fiber fractions variation are structured by organs differently, which underlie potential trade-offs between storage and support functions.
Similarly, these patterns above were also detected in some species studied when comparing organs within the same species. For example, roots of C. sylvestris and E. grandiflora showed a higher total fraction of parenchyma, and M. bella, M. guianensis and C. sylvestris showed a higher ray fraction, while the stem of C. sylvestris showed a higher fiber fraction (Figure 3F,H,D, respectively). However, lower root ray fractions were observed in A. crassiflora and E. suberosum, indicating that in both species, ray parenchyma may be a limited proxy of storage function in the root wood. Furthermore, A. crassiflora exhibited a higher root amount of vessels and fibers. This implies a potential way to minimize the wood risks of embolism induced by water stress [21,29].
The findings that organs differentiate within species could explain the large overlap of most anatomical xylem features between organs across species. Indeed, certain anatomical wood traits in below- and aboveground organs are variable at the intraspecific level [17,48]. For example, we found a larger stem vessel diameter in L. elegans and a higher stem vessel density and amount in C. grandiflora and R. montana, and M. guianensis, respectively. These results indicate that xylem in root and stem is structured to avoid failures in water transport via embolism [29], and it is potentially species-specific for these species. However, implications concerning wood anatomy and water transport should also consider the pit membrane features due to effects on water transport over long distances [14,49], and they need to be further evaluated across Cerrado species. Likewise, observed divergences in fiber features between root and stem in a given species suggest that fiber function as a proxy of wood functions is organ and species dependent. Among the species studied, the large fiber lumen diameter in roots of C. grandiflora and stems of M. guianensis indicates a dual fiber function of support and storage [50,51]. On the other hand, the thicker fiber observed in stems of A. crassfilora and roots of C. sylvestris potentially reinforces certain contrasting demand for mechanical support at the intraspecific level. Finally, other species-specific characteristics (e.g., ray cellular dimensions [52]) could explain the higher ray density in the stem of C. sylvestris.
Despite the patterns discussed above, most of the studied species showed convergences in wood anatomical traits in roots compared to stems. There are, however, other possible explanations. First, general xylem features can be more variable according to environmental, taxonomic classifications (e.g., genus, family), life history or genetically con-served [51,53], which may minimize the organ or species-specific influence on wood traits. Second, patterns of phenological organ growth dynamics vary substantially within species, as observed in roots of temperate tree species [54,55]. Further studies which take these variables into account are needed to better understand structural–functional trade-offs in xylem and plant demands above- and belowground in a broader perspective.
In addition, we observed that no studied trait correlates with organ diameter or plant height across Cerrado species. This outcome is contrary to previous studies which have demonstrated that anatomical wood characteristics variation is influenced by plant size [40,41,42,56]. One potential explanation is that the effect of plant or organ size on variations in anatomical traits could be obscured when considering a single sampling position. Indeed, a potential plant size allometric effect on the anatomical wood traits was detected when considering different heights from the base to tip of the stem in wide range of species [40,50] or along the root and stem [41,42]. Moreover, plant size-dependent wood anatomy variation can occur in species-specific anatomical traits [56], and it is different from those investigated in this study. Future studies along the root and/or stem across and within species from Cerrado is therefore recommended.

4.2. Xylem Anatomy Variation among Leaf Habits

When considering the association of contrasting leaf habits and xylem anatomy, we only found a higher root ray fraction in evergreen plants. This result is contrary to our expectation of increased storage investment in species with deciduous species. The space allocated to ray parenchyma allows for greater storage capacity in woody tissue for the studied evergreen plants [57]. Conversely, less parenchyma in deciduous plants implies a limited role of wood parenchyma as a carbohydrate storage component. The requirement for more energy reserves for regrowth [30] leads deciduous species to prioritize storage tissues and cell types. We suggest that the sampled root deciduous species show alternative carbohydrate storage strategies, such as living fibers and inner bark [58,59,60]. Notwithstanding, our results diverge from the pattern reported of xylem anatomical traits variability related to water transport and support functions among species with contrasting leaf habits [7,23,24,31,32]. Therefore, regardless of organ, the leaf habit potentially plays a limited role in variation in the vessel, fiber, and axial parenchyma characteristics across woody plants from the Brazilian savanna.

5. Conclusions

Our study provides a more integrated insight into the wood anatomy and functional traits of woody plants, reinforcing the importance of plant organs, leaf phenological groups and species-specific analyses to deepen knowledge on xylem variation and plant functionality. The counterbalancing of parenchyma and fiber fractions between roots and stems indicates potential contrasts in mechanical demands on different plant compartments that reflect a trade-off between storage and mechanical support functions. Contrasts in xylem parenchyma traits between organs vary mainly at the intraspecific level. By comparing evergreen, semi-deciduous and deciduous species, we provide evidence that leaf habit is a suitable predictor for variation in storage capacity in root xylem. These findings show that organs, intrinsic factors (i.e., species-specifics), and leaf habits play a major role in structuring wood anatomical variation in parenchyma traits across species from Cerrado. Our approach, based on functional groups represented by leaf habit, in the most floristically diverse savanna [61], also provides valuable information to detect and generalize plant growth response patterns and better understand their responses under extreme climatic scenarios.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f14020269/s1. The Supplementary Material describes wood anatomy traits as function of the leaf habit of species studied. Table S1. Fixed effect estimates of linear mixed models for leaf habits (Dec: deciduous, Sd: semi-deciduous, Ev: evergreen) on wood anatomical traits for a given organ (root, stem) across 15 Cerrado species. Species were considered as a random factor in the models. A Bonferroni post hoc test was used for multiple comparisons among leaf habits. Values in bold indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and investigation: R.D. and C.R.M.; methodology: C.R.M., R.D. and A.N.; formal analysis and writing—original draft preparation: R.D.; writing—review and editing R.D., S.R., L.C.D., V.B., A.N. and C.R.M.; supervision: C.R.M. and A.N.; funding acquisition: C.R.M. R.D. was corresponding author. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP—Procs. 15/14954-1, 19/09417-8), and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT—Proc. 237061). R.D. received grants from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Emerging Leaders in the Americas Program (ELAP—Global Affairs Canada), the Observatoire régional de recherche en forêt boréale, and Centre d’étude de la forêt (CEF—Fonds de recherche du Québec). C.R.M. thanks the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development for the productivity grant (CNPq—Proc. 304715/2018-2), S.R. thanks CAPES-PrInt/Sustainable Development for the grant (Finance Code 462), and A.N. thanks the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development for the Research Grant (CNPq—Proc. 434692/2018-2) and São Paulo Research Foundation through a Young Investigators Grant (FAPESP—2019/19544-7).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to O. Pupo for access to the Cerrado reserve. We thank P. Vergilio, J. A. Rosell, M. Olson, F. Bosio, M. Blagitz, L. C. Pereira, J. da Silva, T. Oya and J. M. Santos for the fieldwork, L.C. Pereira for technical assistance in the lab, and A. Garside for checking the English text. This study is part of the master’s dissertation of the first author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lucas, W.J.; Groover, A.; Lichtenberger, R.; Furuta, K.; Yadav, S.R.; Helariutta, Y.; He, X.Q.; Fukuda, H.; Kang, J.; Brady, S.M.; et al. The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and Functions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 294–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pratt, R.B.; Jacobsen, A.L. Conflicting Demands on Angiosperm Xylem: Tradeoffs among Storage, Transport and Biomechanics. Plant. Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 897–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pratt, R.B.; Jacobsen, A.L.; Percolla, M.I.; de Guzman, M.E.; Traugh, C.A.; Tobin, M.F. Trade-Offs among Transport, Support, and Storage in Xylem from Shrubs in a Semiarid Chaparral Environment Tested with Structural Equation Modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2104336118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lachenbruch, B.; Mcculloh, K.A. Traits, Properties, and Performance: How Woody Plants Combine Hydraulic and Mechanical Functions in a Cell, Tissue, or Whole Plant. New Phytol. 2014, 204, 747–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chave, J.; Coomes, D.; Jansen, S.; Lewis, S.L.; Swenson, N.G.; Zanne, A.E. Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carlquist, S. Ecological Strategies of Xylem Evolution; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  7. Choat, B.; Ball, M.C.; Luly, J.G.; Holtum, J.A.M. Hydraulic Architecture of Deciduous and Evergreen Dry Rainforest Tree Species from North-Eastern Australia. Trees—Struct. Funct. 2005, 19, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zanne, A.E.; Westoby, M.; Falster, D.S.; Ackerly, D.D.; Loarie, S.R.; Arnold, S.E.J.; Coomes, D.A. Angiosperm Wood Structure: Global Patterns in Vessel Anatomy and Their Relation to Wood Density and Potential Conductivity. Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pulido-Rodríguez, E.; López-Camacho, R.; Tórres, J.; Velasco, E.; Salgado-Negret, B. Traits and Trade-Offs of Wood Anatomy between Trunks and Branches in Tropical Dry Forest Species. Trees—Struct. Funct. 2020, 34, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dória, L.C.; Sonsin-Oliveira, J.; Rossi, S.; Marcati, C.R. Functional Trade-Offs in Volume Allocation to Xylem Cell Types in 75 Species from the Brazilian Savanna Cerrado. Ann. Bot. 2022, 130, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jacobsen, A.L.; Agenbag, L.; Esler, K.J.; Pratt, R.B.; Ewers, F.W.; Davis, S.D. Xylem Density, Biomechanics and Anatomical Traits Correlate with Water Stress in 17 Evergreen Shrub Species of the Mediterranean-Type Climate Region of South Africa. J. Ecol. 2007, 95, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Plavcová, L.; Gallenmüller, F.; Morris, H.; Khatamirad, M.; Jansen, S.; Speck, T. Mechanical Properties and Structure–Function Trade-Offs in Secondary Xylem of Young Roots and Stems. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 3679–3691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tyree, M.T.; Zimmermann, M.H. Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hacke, U.G.; Sperry, J.S.; Wheeler, J.K.; Castro, L. Scaling of Angiosperm Xylem Structure with Safety and Efficiency. Tree Physiol. 2006, 26, 689–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jacobsen, A.L.; Valdovinos-Ayala, J.; Rodriguez-Zaccaro, F.D.; Hill-Crim, M.A.; Percolla, M.I.; Venturas, M.D. Intra-Organismal Variation in the Structure of Plant Vascular Transport Tissues in Poplar Trees. Trees—Struct. Funct. 2018, 32, 1335–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McElrone, A.J.; Pockman, W.T.; Martínez-Vilalta, J.; Jackson, R.B. Variation in Xylem Structure and Function in Stems and Roots of Trees to 20 m Depth. New Phytol. 2004, 163, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Machado, S.R.; Rodella, R.A.; Angyalossy, V.; Marcati, C.R. Structural Variations in Root and Stem Wood of Styrax (Styracaceae) from Brazilian Forest and Cerrado. IAWA J. 2007, 28, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Morris, H.; Plavcová, L.; Cvecko, P.; Fichtler, E.; Gillingham, M.A.F.; Martínez-Cabrera, H.I.; McGlinn, D.J.; Wheeler, E.; Zheng, J.; Ziemińska, K.; et al. A Global Analysis of Parenchyma Tissue Fractions in Secondary Xylem of Seed Plants. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1553–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Niklas, K.J. Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  20. West, G.B.; Brown, J.H.; Enquist, B.J. A General Model for the Structure and Allometry of Plant Vascular Systems. Nature 1999, 400, 664–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jacobsen, A.L.; Ewers, F.W.; Pratt, R.B.; Paddock, W.A.; Davis, S.D. Do Xylem Fibers Affect Vessel Cavitation Resistance? Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Eamus, D.; Myers, B.; Duff, G.; Williams, D. Seasonal Changes in Photosynthesis of Eight Savanna Tree Species. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Fu, P.L.; Jiang, Y.J.; Wang, A.Y.; Brodribb, T.J.; Zhang, J.L.; Zhu, S.D.; Cao, K.F. Stem Hydraulic Traits and Leaf Water-Stress Tolerance are Co-Ordinated with the Leaf Phenology of Angiosperm Trees in an Asian Tropical Dry Karst Forest. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arenas-Navarro, M.; Oyama, K.; García-Oliva, F.; Torres-Miranda, A.; De La Riva, E.G.; Terrazas, T. The Role of Wood Anatomical Traits in the Coexistence of Oak Species along an Environmental Gradient. AoB Plants 2021, 13, plab066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Scholz, A.; Stein, A.; Choat, B.; Jansen, S. How Drought and Deciduousness Shape Xylem Plasticity in Three Costa Rican Woody Plant Species. IAWA J. 2014, 35, 337–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Reich, P.B. Phenology of Tropical Forests: Patterns, causes, and consequences. Can. J. Bot. 1995, 73, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goldstein, G.; Rada, F.; Sternberg, L.; Burguera, J.L.; Burguera, M.; Orozco, A.; Zabala, O.; Azocar, A.; Canales, M.J.; Celis, A. Gas Exchange and Water Balance of a Mistletoe Species and Its Mangrove Hosts. Oecologia 1989, 78, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Poorter, L.; Kitajima, K.; Mercado, P.; Chubiña, J.; Melgar, I.; Prins, H.H.T. Resprouting as a Persistence Strategy of Tropical Forest Trees: Relations with Carbohydrate Storage and Shade Tolerance. Ecology 2010, 91, 2613–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hacke, U.G.; Sperry, J.S. Functional and Ecological Xylem Anatomy. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2001, 4, 97–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Piper, F.I.; Fajardo, A. Foliar Habit, Tolerance to Defoliation and Their Link to Carbon and Nitrogen Storage. J. Ecol. 2014, 102, 1101–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, S.B.; Wen, G.J.; Qu, Y.Y.; Yang, L.Y.; Song, Y. Trade-Offs between Xylem Hydraulic Efficiency and Mechanical Strength in Chinese Evergreen and Deciduous Savanna Species. Tree Physiol. 2022, 42, 1337–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Méndez-Alonzo, R.; Pineda-García, F.; Paz, H.; Rosell, J.A.; Olson, M.E. Leaf Phenology is Associated with Soil Water Availability and Xylem Traits in a Tropical Dry Forest. Trees—Struct. Funct. 2013, 27, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Oliveira, P.S.; Marquis, R.J. The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ribeiro, J.F.; Walter, B.M.T. Cerrado: Ambiente e Flora. In Fitofisionomias Do Bioma Cerrado; Sano, S.M., Almeida, S.P., Eds.; EMBRAPA: Planaltina, Brazil, 1998; pp. 89–166. [Google Scholar]
  35. Marcati, C.R.; Machado, S.R.; Podadera, D.S.; de Lara, N.O.T.; Bosio, F.; Wiedenhoeft, A.C. Cambial Activity in Dry and Rainy Season on Branches from Woody Species Growing in Brazilian Cerrado. Flora 2016, 223, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rasband, W.S. 1997–2018. ImageJ. Available online: https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ (accessed on 20 February 2020).
  37. IAWA Committee. List of Microscopic Features for Hardwood Identification. IAWA Bull. 1989, 10, 219–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Scholz, A.; Klepsch, M.; Karimi, Z.; Jansen, S. How to Quantify Conduits in Wood? Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Ziemińska, K.; Butler, D.W.; Gleason, S.M.; Wright, I.J.; Westoby, M. Fibre Wall and Lumen Fractions Drive Wood Density Variation across 24 Australian Angiosperms. AoB Plants 2013, 5, plt046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Olson, M.; Rosell, J.A.; Martínez-Pérez, C.; León-Gómez, C.; Fajardo, A.; Isnard, S.; Cervantes-Alcayde, M.A.; Echeverría, A.; Figueroa-Abundiz, V.A.; Segovia-Rivas, A. Xylem Vessel-Diameter–Shoot-Length Scaling: Ecological Significance of Porosity Types and Other Traits. Ecol. Monogr. 2020, 90, e01410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schuldt, B.; Leuschner, C.; Brock, N.; Horna, V. Changes in Wood Density, Wood Anatomy and Hydraulic Properties of the Xylem along the Root-to-Shoot Flow Path in Tropical Rainforest Trees. Tree Physiol. 2013, 33, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Piermattei, A.; von Arx, G.; Avanzi, C.; Fonti, P.; Gärtner, H.; Piotti, A.; Urbinati, C.; Vendramin, G.G.; Büntgen, U.; Crivellaro, A. Functional Relationships of Wood Anatomical Traits in Norway Spruce. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zuur, A.F.; Ieno, E.N.; Walker, N.J.; Saveliev, A.A.; Smith, G.M. Mixed-Effects Modeling for Ecology with R; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  44. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Viena, Austria, 2021; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 1 June 2021).
  45. Bates, D.; Mächler, M.; Bolker, B.M.; Walker, S.C. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 67, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kuznetsova, A.; Brockhoff, P.B.; Christensen, R.H.B. LmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J. Stat. Softw. 2017, 82, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Russell, A.; Lenth, V.; Buerkner, P.; Giné-vázquez, I.; Herve, M.; Love, J.; Singmann, H.; Lenth, M.R.V. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means. R Package Version 1.4.5. 2020. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (accessed on 1 June 2021).
  48. Marcati, C.R.; Longo, L.R.; Wiedenhoeft, A.; Barros, C.F. Comparative Wood Anatomy of Root and Stem of Citharexylum myrianthum (Verbenaceae). Rodriguésia 2014, 65, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Rosell, J.A.; Olson, M.E.; Anfodillo, T. Scaling of Xylem Vessel Diameter with Plant Size: Causes, Predictions, and Outstanding Questions. Curr. For. Rep. 2017, 3, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Carlquist, S. Living Cells in Wood 3. Overview; Functional Anatomy of the Parenchyma Network. Bot. Rev. 2018, 84, 242–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carlquist, S. How Wood Evolves: A New Synthesis. Botany 2012, 90, 901–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Denne, P.; Gasson, P. Ray Structure in Root- and Stem-Wood of Larix decidua: Implications for Root Identification and Function. IAWA J. 2008, 29, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hietz, P.; Rosner, S.; Hietz-Seifert, U.; Wright, S.J. Wood Traits Related to Size and Life History of Trees in a Panamanian Rainforest. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Makoto, K.; Wilson, S.D.; Sato, T.; Blume-Werry, G.; Cornelissen, J.H.C. Synchronous and Asynchronous Root and Shoot Phenology in Temperate Woody Seedlings. Oikos 2020, 129, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Radville, L.; McCormack, M.L.; Post, E.; Eissenstat, D.M. Root Phenology in a Changing Climate. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 3617–3628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Dória, L.C.; Podadera, D.S.; Lima, R.S.; Lens, F.; Marcati, C.R. Axial Sampling Height Outperforms Site as Predictor of Wood Trait Variation. IAWA J. 2019, 40, 191–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Słupianek, A.; Dolzblasz, A.; Sokołowska, K. Xylem Parenchyma—Role and Relevance in Wood Functioning in Trees. Plants 2021, 10, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Carlquist, S. Comparative Wood Anatomy; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  59. Rosell, J.A.; Piper, F.I.; Jiménez-Vera, C.; Vergílio, P.C.B.; Marcati, C.R.; Castorena, M.; Olson, M.E. Inner Bark as a Crucial Tissue for Non-Structural Carbohydrate Storage across Three Tropical Woody Plant Communities. Plant. Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Herrera-Ramírez, D.; Sierra, C.A.; Römermann, C.; Muhr, J.; Trumbore, S.; Silvério, D.; Brando, P.M.; Hartmann, H. Starch and Lipid Storage Strategies in Tropical Trees Relate to Growth and Mortality. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 139–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Forzza, R.C.; Baumgratz, J.F.A.; Bicudo, C.E.M.; Canhos, D.A.L.; Carvalho, A.A.; Coelho, M.A.N.; Costa, A.F.; Costa, D.P.; Hopkins, M.G.; Leitman, P.M. New Brazilian Floristic List Highlights Conservation Challenges. Bioscience 2012, 62, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Forests 14 00269 g001 550
Figure 1. Stem and root wood, in the transversal section, of studied Cerrado Brazilian plants. For leaf habit type, see Table 1. Scale bars= 200 μm.
Figure 1. Stem and root wood, in the transversal section, of studied Cerrado Brazilian plants. For leaf habit type, see Table 1. Scale bars= 200 μm.
Forests 14 00269 g001
Forests 14 00269 g002 550
Figure 2. Anatomical xylem traits (i.e., hydraulic vessel diameter (A); vessel fraction (B); vessel density (C); fiber fraction (D); fiber lumen diameter (E); total parenchyma fraction (F); fiber wall thickness (G); ray fraction (H); ray density (I); axial parenchyma fraction (J)) as function of organs across 15 woody species from Cerrado. Boxplots show the average (red diamond), individual data points (gray dots), and median (horizontal line); lower and upper boxplots represent the 25th and 75th percentiles; and whiskers represent 1.5 × the interquartile range. Different letters indicate significant difference between organs according to linear mixed models (p < 0.05). ns = not significant.
Figure 2. Anatomical xylem traits (i.e., hydraulic vessel diameter (A); vessel fraction (B); vessel density (C); fiber fraction (D); fiber lumen diameter (E); total parenchyma fraction (F); fiber wall thickness (G); ray fraction (H); ray density (I); axial parenchyma fraction (J)) as function of organs across 15 woody species from Cerrado. Boxplots show the average (red diamond), individual data points (gray dots), and median (horizontal line); lower and upper boxplots represent the 25th and 75th percentiles; and whiskers represent 1.5 × the interquartile range. Different letters indicate significant difference between organs according to linear mixed models (p < 0.05). ns = not significant.
Forests 14 00269 g002
Forests 14 00269 g003 550
Figure 3. Anatomical xylem traits (i.e., hydraulic vessel diameter (A); vessel fraction (B); vessel density (C); fiber fraction (D); fiber lumen diameter (E); total parenchyma fraction (F); fiber wall thickness (G); ray fraction (H); ray density (I); axial parenchyma fraction (J)) as function of species, organs, and leaf habits from Cerrado. Roots and stems are shown in gray and black, respectively. Boxplots show the median (horizontal line); the lower and upper boxplot represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers represent 1.5 × the interquartile. Different letters indicate significant difference between organs for a given species (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Anatomical xylem traits (i.e., hydraulic vessel diameter (A); vessel fraction (B); vessel density (C); fiber fraction (D); fiber lumen diameter (E); total parenchyma fraction (F); fiber wall thickness (G); ray fraction (H); ray density (I); axial parenchyma fraction (J)) as function of species, organs, and leaf habits from Cerrado. Roots and stems are shown in gray and black, respectively. Boxplots show the median (horizontal line); the lower and upper boxplot represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers represent 1.5 × the interquartile. Different letters indicate significant difference between organs for a given species (p < 0.05).
Forests 14 00269 g003
Forests 14 00269 g004 550
Figure 4. Anatomical xylem traits(i.e., hydraulic vessel diameter (A); vessel fraction (B); vessel density (C); fiber fraction (D); fiber lumen diameter (E); total parenchyma fraction (F); fiber wall thickness (G); ray fraction (H); ray density (I); axial parenchyma fraction (J)) as function of leaf habit senescence and organs of the studied Cerrado species (N = 15). Roots and stems are shown in gray and black, respectively. Boxplots show the average (red diamond), individual data points (dots), and median (horizontal line); lower and upper boxplots represent the 25th and 75th percentiles; and whiskers represent 1.5× the interquartile range. Different letters indicate a significant difference among leaf habits for a given organ according to Bonferroni post hoc test (p < 0.05); uppercase: root, lowercase: stem. ns = not significant. Dec, deciduous; Sd, semi-deciduous; Ev, evergreen.
Figure 4. Anatomical xylem traits(i.e., hydraulic vessel diameter (A); vessel fraction (B); vessel density (C); fiber fraction (D); fiber lumen diameter (E); total parenchyma fraction (F); fiber wall thickness (G); ray fraction (H); ray density (I); axial parenchyma fraction (J)) as function of leaf habit senescence and organs of the studied Cerrado species (N = 15). Roots and stems are shown in gray and black, respectively. Boxplots show the average (red diamond), individual data points (dots), and median (horizontal line); lower and upper boxplots represent the 25th and 75th percentiles; and whiskers represent 1.5× the interquartile range. Different letters indicate a significant difference among leaf habits for a given organ according to Bonferroni post hoc test (p < 0.05); uppercase: root, lowercase: stem. ns = not significant. Dec, deciduous; Sd, semi-deciduous; Ev, evergreen.
Forests 14 00269 g004
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of studied species. Values represent means ± standard error (N = 3). Stem and root diameters were measured at 60 cm aboveground and 15–30 cm belowground, respectively. Dec: deciduous; Sd: semi-deciduous; Ev: evergreen.
Table 1. Characteristics of studied species. Values represent means ± standard error (N = 3). Stem and root diameters were measured at 60 cm aboveground and 15–30 cm belowground, respectively. Dec: deciduous; Sd: semi-deciduous; Ev: evergreen.
SpeciesFamilyLeaf
Habit		Growth FormPlant Height
(m)		Stem Diameter
(cm)		Root Diameter
(cm)
Aegiphila verticillata Vell.LamiaceaeDecTree4.3 ± 0.714.7 ± 3.93.6 ± 1.3
Annona crassiflora Mart.AnnonaceaeDecTree3.8 ± 0.615.7 ± 2.38.8 ± 0.7
Caryocar brasiliense Cambess.CaryocaraceaeSdShrub1.8 ± 0.15.7 ± 2.312.4 ± 2.0
Casearia sylvestris Sw.SalicaceaeSdShrub2.3 ± 0.14.7 ± 2.01.5 ± 0.2
Couepia grandiflora (Mart. & Zucc.) Benth.ChrysobalanaceaeDecTree3.1 ± 0.512.5 ± 1.011.9 ± 0.4
Diospyros lasiocalyx (Mart.) B. Walln.EbanaceaeDecTree2.7 ± 0.29.2 ± 0.57.5 ± 0.5
Eriotheca gracilipes (K.Schum.) A.RobynsMalvaceaeSdTree4.6 ± 0.819.3 ± 2.413.6 ± 0.9
Erythroxylum buxos Peyr.ErythroxylaceaeEvShrub2.2 ± 0.42.7 ± 0.32.2 ± 0.2
Erythroxylum suberosum A.St.-Hil.ErythroxylaceaeSdTree2.7 ± 0.69.7 ± 2.22.7 ± 1.4
Leptolobium elegans VogelLeguminosaeDecTree4.5 ± 1.013.3 ± 1.82.8 ± 0.6
Myrcia bella Cambess.MyrtaceaeSdTree4.5 ± 0.511.9 ± 0.55.7 ± 2.5
Myrcia guianensis (Aubl.) DC.MyrtaceaeEvShrub2.1 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.3
Piptocarpha rotundifolia (Less.) BakerAsteraceaeEvTree3 ± 0.314.6 ± 3.57.5 ± 3.2
Qualea grandiflora Mart.VochysiaceaeDecTree5.8 ± 0.726.7 ± 4.713.5 ± 9.2
Roupala montana Aubl.ProteaceaeEvTree3.0 ± 0.56.3 ± 1.56.6 ± 2.6
Table
Table 2. Fixed effect estimates of linear mixed models for organ (root, stem), organ diameter and plant height on wood anatomical traits across 15 Cerrado species. Individuals nested within species were considered the random term in all models. Values in bold denote statistical significance. SE = standard deviation.
Table 2. Fixed effect estimates of linear mixed models for organ (root, stem), organ diameter and plant height on wood anatomical traits across 15 Cerrado species. Individuals nested within species were considered the random term in all models. Values in bold denote statistical significance. SE = standard deviation.
Response VariableFixed FactorEstimateSEt-Valuep-ValueGraph
sqrt Hydraulic
vessel diameter		Organ (root–stem)0.160.330.470.64Figure 2A
Organ_diameter0.010.040.200.84
Plant_height0.380.241.610.11
Vessel fractionOrgan (root–stem)0.000.000.370.72Figure 2B
Organ_diameter0.000.000.510.62
Plant_height0.000.001.690.10
log Vessel densityOrgan (root–stem)0.100.120.750.46Figure 2C
Organ_diameter−0.030.01−2.150.04
Plant_height0.030.090.320.75
Fiber fractionOrgan (root–stem)−0.070.03−2.540.02Figure 2D
Organ_diameter−0.000.01−0.130.90
Plant_height0.010.020.300.77
Fiber lumen diameterOrgan (root–stem)−0.040.37−0.090.93Figure 2E
Organ_diameter0.010.040.100.92
Plant_height−0.070.26−0.260.80
Total parenchyma fractionOrgan (root–stem)0.070.032.270.05Figure 2F
Organ_diameter0.010.010.110.78
Plant_height−0.020.02−1.050.48
Fiber wall thicknessOrgan (root–stem)−0.330.21−1.570.07Figure 2G
Organ_diameter0.020.230.510.55
Plant_height0.060.130.460.17
Ray fractionOrgan (root–stem)0.080.023.790.002Figure 2H
Organ_diameter0.010.012.750.04
Plant_height−0.020.02−1.530.06
sqrt Ray densityOrgan (root–stem)0.020.090.180.97Figure 2I
Organ_diameter0.020.012.190.05
Plant_height−0.100.06−1.900.77
Axial parenchyma fractionOrgan (root–stem)0.010.020.430.72Figure 2J
Organ_diameter−0.010.02−0.150.76
Plant_height−0.010.01−0.950.79
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dutra, R.; Nogueira, A.; Rossi, S.; Chacon Dória, L.; Buttò, V.; Marcati, C.R. The Role of Organ and Leaf Habit on the Secondary Xylem Anatomy Variation across 15 Species from Brazilian Cerrado. Forests 2023, 14, 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020269

AMA Style

Dutra R, Nogueira A, Rossi S, Chacon Dória L, Buttò V, Marcati CR. The Role of Organ and Leaf Habit on the Secondary Xylem Anatomy Variation across 15 Species from Brazilian Cerrado. Forests. 2023; 14(2):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dutra, Rafaella, Anselmo Nogueira, Sergio Rossi, Larissa Chacon Dória, Valentina Buttò, and Carmen Regina Marcati. 2023. "The Role of Organ and Leaf Habit on the Secondary Xylem Anatomy Variation across 15 Species from Brazilian Cerrado" Forests 14, no. 2: 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020269

APA Style

Dutra, R., Nogueira, A., Rossi, S., Chacon Dória, L., Buttò, V., & Marcati, C. R. (2023). The Role of Organ and Leaf Habit on the Secondary Xylem Anatomy Variation across 15 Species from Brazilian Cerrado. Forests, 14(2), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop