Next Article in Journal
Variation in Leaf Cutin Content and Chemical Composition along One Annual Cycle in the Mediterranean Cork Oak (Quercus suber L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Landscape Preference Evaluation of Old Residential Neighbourhoods: A Case Study in Shi Jiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
Previous Article in Journal
Differences of Moss Mites Communities at Different Vegetation Succession Stages in Subalpine Wetland (Jiulongchi, Fanjing Mountain), Southwest China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Forest Landscape Spaces on Physical and Mental Restoration and Preferences of Young Adults of Different Genders
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/f14020333
Review Report
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Protocol
Peer-Review Record

Forest Therapy for Women with Gynaecological Cancer—A Feasibility Study to Find New Alternatives in Cancer Rehabilitation

Forests 2023, 14(2), 333; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020333
by Hanna Anundi 1, Ann Dolling 2 and Anna María Pálsdóttir 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Jelena Tomicevic
Reviewer 2:
Jin-Gun Kim
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Forests 2023, 14(2), 333; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020333
Submission received: 29 December 2022 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 3 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest, Trees, Human Health and Wellbeing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We sincerely thank you for your constructive feedback and suggestions that have improved the manuscript. Please advise if further clarifications are needed.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We sincerely thank you for your constructive feedback and suggestions that have improved the manuscript.Please advise if further clarifications are needed.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

I have no objections to the research protocol. I look forward to the results received by the authors. I agree as much as possible that these types are very much needed, and that the alternative of forest baths can help in recovery, after the trauma of cancer, especially for women. 

Author Response

Thank you for the encouraging words on this pilot study. We hope that the intervention in the form of forest bathing will be a supportive intervention for the vulnerable group in a life crisis and a large-scale study including a control group could be the next step.

Kind regards

The authors

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall, I think it can be accept in present form because it reflects the reviewers' comments well.

Back to TopTop