Next Article in Journal
Assessment of the Potential of Indirect Measurement for Sap Flow Using Environmental Factors and Artificial Intelligence Approach: A Case Study of Magnolia denudata in Shanghai Urban Green Spaces
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing Forest-Change-Induced Carbon Storage Dynamics by Integrating GF-1 Image and Localized Allometric Growth Equations in Jiangning District, Nanjing, Eastern China (2017–2020)
Previous Article in Journal
Large-Scale and High-Accuracy Phenotyping of Populus simonii Leaves Using the Colony Counter and OpenCV
Previous Article in Special Issue
Soil Temperature, Organic-Carbon Storage, and Water-Holding Ability Should Be Accounted for the Empirical Soil Respiration Model Selection in Two Forest Ecosystems
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Habitat Distribution Pattern of Rare and Endangered Plant Magnolia wufengensis in China under Climate Change

Forests 2023, 14(9), 1767; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091767
by Xiaodeng Shi 1,2,3,†, Qun Yin 2,3,†, Ziyang Sang 4, Zhonglong Zhu 2,3, Zhongkui Jia 2,3,* and Luyi Ma 2,3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Forests 2023, 14(9), 1767; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091767
Submission received: 4 August 2023 / Revised: 24 August 2023 / Accepted: 29 August 2023 / Published: 31 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling Forest Response to Climate Change)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I found this manuscript very interesting and well-written. The quality and number of graphs are adequate for this type of paper. I have only  one suggestion: In L 124 & 125 the word "ex-situ" should be written as "ex situ", that is, in italics and without de - separating both words.

Author Response

Response: We revised "ex-situ" into "ex situ" in the new line 124 & 125.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article is well defined in all its parts.

It has a sufficiently broad introduction and good citations.

The methodology is well exposed, giving way to the results following the same methodology.

In the results section a table with potential surface area values could be added.  In this table a comparison can be made between the current surface (with the 4 levels) and the future surfaces, which would allow to see the increase and/or decrease of the potential surface in the different scenarios.

I think that in this way, the results can be seen in a clearer way.

In general the article is fine, and if you want to take into account what was said above it would be ready to be published.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see the attachment. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript is sufficiently improved.

 

Back to TopTop