Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Teakwood Bending Components with Excellent Softening Properties by Vacuum Impregnation with Triethanolamine Compounding Solution
Previous Article in Journal
Restorative Environment Characteristics of an Urban Forest Based on Big Data Analytics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptomic Response to Drought Stress in Populus davidiana Dode
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Salt Tolerance-Associated WRKY Family Genes in Cyclocarya paliurus

Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Biodiversity Conservation in Karst Mountainous Areas of Southwestern China, School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Forests 2023, 14(9), 1771; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091771
Submission received: 3 August 2023 / Revised: 25 August 2023 / Accepted: 29 August 2023 / Published: 31 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomics of Growth Traits and Stress Acclimation in Forest Trees)

Abstract

:
WRKY proteins are key transcription factors involved in a range of physiological processes and environmental adaptations. Yet, little is known about the role WRKY genes play in Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja (C. paliurus) a significant medicinal plant belonging to the Juglandaceae family. Leveraging the recently released whole-genome sequence of C. paliurus, we conducted an in-depth, genome-wide study on the expression of WRKY genes under environmental stresses. We identified 80 CpWRKY genes, classifying them into distinct groups and subgroups based on their structural and phylogenetic characteristics. Synteny analysis and phylogenetic comparison provided insights into the evolutionary traits of these genes. We further investigated the response of the WRKY gene family to salinity stress in combination with the following specific stressors: Methyl jasmonate (MeJA), sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP), which induce the production of signaling molecules jasmonates (JA), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and nitric oxide (NO), respectively. Our comprehensive analysis of CpWRKY gene expression patterns under various conditions revealed that combined treatments were more effective in inducing up-regulation of CpWRKY gene expression than individual treatments.

1. Introduction

WRKY transcription factors (TFs) are a unique class of proteins commonly present in higher plants and throughout the entire green lineage. These proteins are characterized by a distinct 60-amino acid WRKY domain, which encompasses a highly conserved WRKYGQK sequence and a zinc finger motif, enabling them to bind robustly to W-box cis-elements [1,2,3]. According to the number of WRKY domains and their zinc finger motif structure, WRKY proteins can be divided into three major categories [4]. These proteins exhibit a wide range of functions, influencing various physiological processes. These include aging [5], seed dormancy and germination [6], embryogenesis [7], trichome development [8], regulation of flowering time [9,10], determination of fruit flavor [11], and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites [12,13,14].
Research has underscored the role of WRKY TFs in plant defense responses against both biotic and abiotic stresses. These TFs are responsive to dehydration stress and phosphate deficiency. For instance, VvWRKY11 from grapevines is implicated in dehydration stress response [15], while AtWRKY75, induced during phosphate deficiency, has been linked to increased phosphate stress susceptibility when suppressed [16]. In maize, salt tolerance is facilitated by the interaction between transcription factor ZmWRKY20 and ZmWRKY115, which represses ZmbZIP111 expression [17]. Furthermore, the BnD11 gene expression from the WRKY transcription factor family augments salt tolerance and drought resistance in rapeseed [18]. Moreover, WRKY TFs play a pivotal role in signal transduction processes, especially those regulated by plant hormones, such as abscisic acid (ABA) and salicylic acid (SA) [6]. They work in conjunction with other elements to fine-tune responses to environmental stimuli. Studying the evolution of WRKY gene family provides valuable insights into the development of biotic and abiotic stress responses and signal transduction mechanisms.
Salinity stress, caused by the accumulation of high levels of salt in the soil, poses a major threat to agricultural productivity worldwide. As the global climate changes and human activities lead to soil salinization, understanding the molecular mechanisms that govern plant responses to salinity stress becomes crucial for developing stress-tolerant crops and ensuring food security. Among the various transcription factors that play pivotal roles in mediating plant stress responses, the WRKY family has emerged as a key player in the regulatory network involved in salinity stress adaptation [19]. In recent years, accumulating evidence has suggested that WRKY transcription factors play a central role in orchestrating plant responses to salinity stress [19,20,21]. Several members of the WRKY family have been shown to exhibit differential expression under salinity stress, and their overexpression or suppression has been associated with enhanced or reduced tolerance to salt in different plant species [22]. These findings highlight the potential of WRKY transcription factors as promising candidates for improving crop salinity tolerance through genetic engineering or breeding strategies.
Salinity stress responses in plants are complex and interconnected with various signaling pathways. Recently, gasotransmitters, like nitric oxide (NO), jasmonates (JA), and hydrogen sulfide (H2S), have emerged as important players in these processes. NO, as a versatile signaling molecule, plays a crucial role in plants by acting as a highly reactive free radical gas [23]. JA, on the other hand, are lipid-derived plant hormones that regulate diverse processes, including defense responses and developmental pathways [24,25]. H2S, similar to NO, interacts with other hormone signaling pathways, such as ABA and ethylene, to modulate plant responses to environmental stresses [26]. These small gaseous molecules serve as vital signaling mediators, facilitating cross-talk between different stress response pathways and regulating various physiological processes in plants [27]. Combining salinity stress with the application of these stressors provides valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying plant acclimation and adaptation to multiple environmental challenges.
Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja (C. paliurus), also known as the sweet tea tree or the tea tree of immortality, is a deciduous tree native to China [28,29,30]. It belongs to the Juglandaceae family, which also includes walnuts and pecans [30]. The tree is primarily found in the central and southern regions of China, particularly in the provinces of Hubei, Hunan, and Guizhou [31]. Cyclocarya paliurus (C. paliurus) has long been recognized for its medicinal properties, containing valuable biological components such as triterpenoids, polysaccharides, and flavonoids [32,33]. Its leaves are commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat various ailments, and the tea made from C. paliurus leaves has gained popularity due to its diverse health benefits [32,34]. However, the species is facing environmental challenges, especially salinity stress, which can harm plant growth [35]. To protect C. paliurus and understand its response to salinity stress, it is crucial to identify key genes involved in this process [28,36]. Among the gene families associated with salinity stress response, the WRKY gene family has been extensively studied in other plant species but remains relatively unexplored in C. paliurus [37]. The recently completed C. paliurus genome sequencing provides an opportunity to study the structure, expression, and evolutionary characteristics of the WRKY gene family at the whole genome level [38].
The study aims to bridge this knowledge gap by investigating the role of WRKY genes in the response to salt stress in C. paliurus. By identifying the WRKY family genes associated with salt tolerance and analyzing their expression profile, we hope to provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying salt tolerance in C. paliurus. This knowledge is crucial for enhancing the salt tolerance of C. paliurus and exploring the feasibility of cultivating it in coastal saline areas.
In this study, we focused on the WRKY gene family in C. paliurus and identified 80 WRKY genes categorized into three groups. Comprehensive analyses were conducted to understand their characteristics and evolution. We also examined their expression under different conditions, including salinity stress. Additionally, we explored the interplay between WRKY genes and gasotransmitters (NO, JA, H2S) during salinity stress. These findings provide insights into stress adaptation and offer potential strategies for enhancing crop resilience and global food security.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Gene Identification

This study employed a systematic approach to identify and validate WRKY genes in the C. paliurus genome. The genome of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja (C. paliurus) can be extracted at the website (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn, accessed on 12 April 2023). This was achieved using hidden Markov models (HMMs) from the Pfam protein family database and by confirming the presence of core WRKY sequences. Further validation of the annotation of the predicted WRKY gene model through RNA seq reading. These models were then curated, with some being validated through PCR amplification and sequencing, culminating in the final set of WRKY gene models.
Additional information about the identified WRKY proteins was also gathered. This included data on sequence length, molecular weights, isoelectric points, and predictions of subcellular locations. These details were obtained using tools available on the ExPasy website (https://www.expasy.org/, accessed on 15 April 2023).

2.2. Sequence Analysis

A series of bioinformatics tools and techniques were used to analyze the WRKY proteins in C. paliurus. The WRKY domain sequence of protein characterizations were aligned using ClustalW 2.0 software (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/, accessed on 20 April 2023) and subsequently adjusted with the help of GeneDoc 2.7 software. Using Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/, accessed on 25 April 2023) to determine the Exon Intron Tissue of C. paliurus WRKY gene [39]. Furthermore, the MEME online program (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/intro.html, accessed on 13 May 2023) was employed to identify conserved motifs in the WRKY proteins we discovered [40]. These steps provided valuable insights into the structure of these proteins and their potential functions within C. paliurus. This tool was used with optimized parameters, including a maximum of 20 motifs and an optimum width between 5 and 100 residues.

2.3. Chromosomal Distribution and Gene Duplication

In this study, we used a variety of tools to analyze the CpWRKY genes in C. paliurus. First, we mapped these genes to the chromosomes of C. paliurus using a tool called Circos [41]. Next, we employed MCScanX to examine gene duplication events, using the software’s default parameters [42]. Finally, we used Dual Synteny Plotter software (https://github.com/CJ-Chen/Tbtools, accessed on 20 May 2023) to create syntenic analysis maps [43]. These maps allowed us to visualize the synteny relationships between the orthologous WRKY genes in C. paliurus and those in other selected species.

2.4. Classification and Phylogenetic Analysis of C. paliurus WRKY Gene Family

The outgroup is a taxon closely related to, but not part of, the group of interest (ingroup). It helps root the phylogenetic tree, clarifying evolutionary relationships within the ingroup. By comparing the two, we can deduce the common ancestor and evolutionary path. In our study, we chose Molluginaceae as the outgroup based on its established taxonomic relationship and prior research [44]. Using an outgroup like this enhances the precision of our phylogenetic analysis by offering a benchmark for evolutionary comparison. The WRKY genes in C. paliurus were classified into different groups using the At-WRKY classification scheme. This was achieved by aligning their WRKY domains with those of CpWRKY and AtWRKY proteins. The phylogenetic tree is constructed using the Poisson model and through the neighbor-joining (NJ) method in MEGA 5.0.
To compare the C. paliurus WRKY genes with those of other species, we obtained WRKY protein sequences from Arabidopsis and rice [45,46]. These sequences were retrieved from the Phytozome database, based on the descriptions provided in the corresponding literature. This comparative analysis allowed for a deeper understanding of the evolutionary relationships and potential functional similarities between the WRKY genes in these different species.

2.5. RNA-Seq Data Analysis and GO Annotation

We sourced our transcriptome data from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BioProject database, specifically under the project number PRJNA799813. We then selected CpWRKYs that had RPKM (reads per kilobase of transcript, per million mapped reads) and FPKM (fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads) values greater than 1 for further analysis. To visualize the expression patterns of these selected genes, we generated a heatmap using TBtools V1.098 [47]. For gene ontology (GO) analysis, we refer to the NCBI database, using the Blast2GO program (https://www.biobam.com/blast2go/, accessed on 30 May 2023) [48]. The results of the study can be divided into the following three main categories: molecular function, biological processes, and cellular components.

2.6. Promoter Cis-Acting Element Prediction

To analyze promoter sequences, the sequence 1500 bp upstream of the transcription start site of the CpWRKYs gene was extracted from transcriptome sequencing data using BEDtools (version 2.25.0) [49]. The PlantCARE online tool (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 26 April 2023) was utilized to identify motifs present in promoter sequences.

2.7. Plant Materials and Treatments

High-salting pot experiment of C. paliurus: In order to better observe the effects of high-concentration salt stress on the growth of C. paliurus, in this study, two C. paliurus plants with good growth status were selected, one was treated with high concentration salt (4% NaCl), and the other was treated with distilled water as blank control. Pour 1L of the corresponding solution into the pot every 2 days. Observe and record the growth of the plants every day. Because of the high concentration of salt treatment for a long time, the growth of willow plants was seriously affected, and even led to the death of the plants. The plants treated with high salt can be used to view phenotypic changes but may cause low confidence in subsequent experimental data. Therefore, this study adopts the method of low salt treatment to carry out the following experiment.
The study conducted eight treatments. These treatments included a control group (CK) that was treated with distilled water, a group subjected to salt stress with 0.4% NaCl, a Methyl Jasmonate (MeJA) group treated with 0.2 mM MeJA and distilled water, and a combined salt + MeJA group. We also had a Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) group treated with 0.25 mM SNP and distilled water, a combined salt + SNP group, a Sodium Hydrosulfide (NaHS) group treated with 0.5 mM NaHS and distilled water, and a combined salt + NaHS group. The NaCl solution was gradually introduced into the planting substrate to induce salt stress. The MeJA, SNP, and NaHS solutions were sprayed onto the plants to induce various physiological responses.
After a period of 30 days, leaf samples were collected from each plant. We ensured a representative sample by collecting two leaves from the upper, middle, and lower parts of each plant. These samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen to halt any biological activity and then stored at −80 °C until further analysis. This rigorous process ensured the preservation of the samples and the reliability of the subsequent analyses.

2.8. Expression Profile under Salinity Stress and qRT-PCR Analysis

In the pot experiment, we quantified the transcript abundance using a metric known as fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) values. This measure provides a normalized count of the number of reads mapped to each gene, allowing for a comparison of gene expression levels across different samples.
We derived the expression profiles of C. paliurus from the transcriptome sequencing data under various treatments. These treatments included the control (CK), salt, salt + Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP), salt + Methyl Jasmonate (MeJA), and salt + Sodium Hydrosulfide (NaHS).
To visualize the expression patterns across these different treatments, we generated a heatmap using the TBtools software (https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools, accessed on 6 June 2023). This graphical representation allowed us to easily compare and contrast the gene expression levels under different conditions, providing valuable insights into the response of C. paliurus to various stressors.

2.9. Sequence Analysis

For the statistical analysis of our data, we employed a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). This method allowed us to identify significant variations in gene expression across the different treatments. Following the ANOVA, we used the Duncan’s test for multiple comparisons to further investigate the differences between each treatment group.
All of these statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22 software (SPSS Inc., IBM Company Headquarters, Chicago, IL, USA). This software is a powerful tool for managing and analyzing data, and it provided us with robust and reliable results. The data obtained from these analyses were presented as means with their corresponding standard deviations (SD).

3. Results

3.1. Identification of WRKY Proteins in Cyclocarya paliurus (C. paliurus)

At the outset, we obtained a total of 95 candidate gene models corresponding to the Pfam WRKY family. To validate these gene models, we cross-checked their annotations using available Cyclocarya paliurus (C. paliurus) transcriptome data. Through a comparative analysis with the WRKY family in Arabidopsis thaliana, HMM models, and Pfam results, we identified discrepancies and manually curated some incorrectly predicted WRKY gene models. As a result, 12 redundant sequences were removed. Ultimately, we meticulously selected and annotated 80 gene models as C. paliurus WRKY genes, ensuring they were included based on the presence of the intact WRKY domain. The validation sequences of CpWRKY genes are provided in Supplementary File S1. We successfully mapped these 80 WRKY genes onto the corresponding linkage groups and systematically renamed them as CpWRKY1 to CpWRKY80 based on their sequential arrangement on the linkage groups (Figure S1).
We further analyzed gene characteristics, including the length of the coding sequence (CDS), length of the protein sequence, protein molecular weight (MW), isoelectric point (pI), and subcellular localization (Supplementary Excel S1). Among the 80 CpWRKY proteins, CpWRKY42 was identified as the smallest protein, consisting of 152 amino acids (aa), while CpWRKY19 was the largest, with 818 aa. The MW of the proteins was from 17.7 to 89.6 kDa, and the pI was from 5.06 (CpWRKY50 and CpWRKY19) to 9.93 (CpWRKY3). In terms of subcellular localization, all 80 CpWRKY proteins were predicted to be located in the nucleus, as indicated by our predictions (Supplementary Excel S1).

3.2. Multisequence Alignment, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Classification of CpWRKY Genes

The CpWRKY genes are classified based on phylogenetic analysis and multiple sequence alignment of its WRKY domain, which usually spans about 60 amino acids. As representatives for comparison, we randomly selected the WRKY domains of seven different Arabidopsis WRKY proteins (AtWRKY33, 18, 42, 48, 74, 69, 55) from each of the groups or subgroups.
Phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1) identified three main groups in C. paliurus, which corresponded to groups I, II, and III as identified in Arabidopsis, a model plant species [2]. Group I consisted of 18 CpWRKY proteins, all containing two WRKY domains and C2H2-type zinc finger motifs (C-X4-C-X22–23-H-X-H) (Figure S2; Supplementary Excel S1). Through further analysis, we found that the WRKY domain sequences of 80 CpWRKY proteins had high conservatism. Specifically, 78 out of the 80 CpWRKY proteins displayed the highly conserved sequence WRKYGQK within their WRKY domain. This conservation suggests the functional importance of this sequence motif in WRKY proteins. However, it is worth noting that CpWRKY56 and CpWRKY55 exhibited a slight variation in this conserved sequence, differing by a single amino acid (Figure S2). Notably, CpWRKY80, belonging to group I, possessed two WRKY domains and a C2H2-type zinc finger motif at its N-terminus, while lacking this motif at the C-terminus. Group II contains 52 CpWRKY proteins, all of which possessed C2H2-type zinc finger (C-X4-5-C-X23-H-X-H), which can be further subdivided into 5 subgroups (IIa-IIe). Within group II, 5 WRKY proteins belonged to subgroup IIa, 14 to IIb, 15 to IIc, 5 to IId, and 13 to IIe. Lastly, group III included 10 CpWRKY members, all of which possessed C2HC-type zinc finger (C-X7-C-X23-H-X-C) (Figure S2; Supplementary Excel S1).

3.3. Gene Structure and Motif Composition of C. paliurus WRKY Gene Family

To better understand the evolution of the WRKY gene family in C. paliurus, we examined the exon–intron organization of all the identified CpWRKY genes. Figure 2 illustrates that CpWRKY genes exhibit diverse exon numbers, ranging from two to seven. Specifically, we observed that 6 genes have 2 exons, 33 genes have 3 exons, 10 genes have 4 exons, 21 genes have 5 exons, 9 genes have 6 exons, and 1 gene has 7 exons. Interestingly, we did not find any genes with only one exon in our analysis; moreover, we noticed a pattern where genes belonging to the same group tend to have similar exon–intron structures (Figure 2a,b). For instance, all members of group IIe share a three-exon and two-intron configuration.
Notably, each CpWRKY gene was found to contain an intron within its WRKY domain. The distribution and phases of these introns corresponded with those observed in the CpWRKY gene alignment. The V-type intron is a phase 0 intron, which is only found in IIa and IIb groups. On the other hand, type r intron is a phase 1 intron, which has been identified in all other groups, including groups I, IIc, IId, IIe, and III. This pattern mirrors observations made in both rice and Arabidopsis [24]. In a surprising finding, we discovered that no introns were present in the N-terminal WRKY domains of the group I genes. This absence of introns in these specific domains could suggest unique regulatory mechanisms or evolutionary paths for these genes.
Moving on to the motif composition of CpWRKY proteins, we conducted MEME motif analysis (Figure 2c). In addition to the well-known WRKY domains (motifs 1 and 2), CpWRKY members within the same groups often shared similar motif compositions (Supplementary Excel S2). For instance, motif 10 was unique to group I, while motif 4 and motif 6 were specific to group IIa and IIb, respectively. We also observed closely clustered pairs of CpWRKY proteins, such as CpWRKY4/5, CpWRKY44/79, CpWRKY23/47, CpWRKY32/74, and others, which exhibited highly similar motif distributions. The presence of these similar motif arrangements within specific subgroups suggests conserved protein architecture; however, the roles of the majority of these preserved motifs are still unknown.
In summary, the conserved motif composition and similar gene structure in the same taxa, combined with the results of our phylogenetic analysis, provide strong support for the reliability of taxa classification.

3.4. Evolutionary Analysis of Group III WRKY Genes in C. paliurus and Several Different Species

The group III WRKY gene is thought to play a crucial role in plant adaptation and evolution, emerging after the differentiation of monocots and dicots [29]. In order to further investigate the duplication and diversity of C. paliurus group III genes, we detected available WRKY III genes. The phylogenetic tree of WRKY III was constructed using the whole protein sequences of WRKY III of three monocots (pineapple, rice, maize) and four dicots (Arabidopsis, grapes, and poplar) (Supplementary Excel S3) [4,50,51]. The phylogenetic analysis, performed using MEGA 5.0, revealed two distinct clades (Figure S3). Within these clades, WRKY members from closely related species clustered together, signifying their evolutionary relationships. For instance, Clade 1a and Clade 1b consisted of members from rice and maize, two non-grass monocots. Clade 1c encompassed WRKY genes from six different species, suggesting they might be orthologous genes originating from a common ancestor. Intriguingly, a small branch in the phylogenetic tree grouped together three C. paliurus WRKY members with three poplar WRKY members and two grape WRKY members, indicating their evolutionary connection during the evolutionary process.
Through the use of the MEME web server, we identified 20 distinct conserved motifs among the WRKY III proteins. Notably, motifs 1, 2, and 10 were found to encode the WRKY domain. We observed that the WRKY members from the same lineage often shared similar motif compositions, suggesting potential functional similarities. Interestingly, motif 6 was unique to members of Clade 2, suggesting that it might play a critical role in the biological activities of certain WRKY III proteins. Additionally, motif 20 was found exclusively in WRKY III proteins from monocotyledonous plants, indicating that it may have played a significant role in the functional divergence of WRKY genes during the evolution of these plants.
In conclusion, our phylogenetic analysis and examination of motif composition among group III WRKY genes in C. paliurus and various species provide valuable insights into their evolutionary patterns and potential functional similarities.

3.5. Chromosomal Distribution and Synteny Analysis of AcWRKY Genes

In our study, we observed an uneven distribution of the CpWRKY genes across the 16 C. paliurus linkage groups (chromosomes, Chr), with the exception of Chr 14 (Figure S4). Chr05 had the highest number of CpWRKY genes, totaling 11. Some linkage groups, such as Chr05, Chr04, and Chr02, had a higher number of CpWRKY genes, while others, like Chr10 and Chr12, had fewer.
We also identified tandem duplication events, which are a common mechanism for gene family expansion. Notably, Chr05 revealed four clusters of CpWRKY genes, indicating that it was a hotspot for WRKY gene distribution. In total, the 47 CpWRKY genes were clustered into 23 locations across various linkage groups, further highlighting the occurrence of tandem duplication events.
Interestingly, we found that the quantity of WRKY genes did not positively correlate with the length of the chromosomes. This suggests that other factors, such as selective pressure or functional diversification, might have influenced the distribution and expansion of the CpWRKY genes. In addition to tandem duplication events, the study also identified that 30 WRKY genes from segmental duplication events and 3 WRKY genes are dispersed duplication by using BLASTP and MCScanX methods (Supplementary Excel S4). These results suggest that gene duplication, both tandem and segmental, played a significant role in the evolution of CpWRKY genes.
To further investigate the phylogenetic mechanisms of the CpWRKY gene family, comparative syntenic maps were constructed for C. paliurus with the following two representative species: Arabidopsis (a dicot) and rice (a monocot) (Figure 3). A total of 24 CpWRKY genes showed syntenic relationships with genes in Arabidopsis, followed by rice with 11 syntenic genes (Supplementary File S2). The numbers of orthologous gene pairs between rice and Arabidopsis were 22 and 31. Some CpWRKY genes were discovered to be linked to at least three syntenic gene pairs, indicating their significance in the evolution of the WRKY gene family.
Interestingly, certain collinear gene pairs identified between C. paliurus and rice were not found between C. paliurus and Arabidopsis, such as CpWRKY9/OsWRKY9 and CpWRKY13/OsWRKY47. These orthologous pairs may have developed following the split between dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants, according to this evidence. Additionally, certain collinear pairs between C. paliurus and both rice and Arabidopsis (with eight CpWRKY genes) were discovered, suggesting that these orthologous pairs may have existed before the original separation.

3.6. GO Annotation and Cis-Element Analyses of the CpWRKYs

To understand the biological functions associated with CpWRKY genes, GO annotation was performed on the 80 identified CpWRKY proteins (Figure S5; Supplementary Excel S5). The GO annotation results categorized the CpWRKY proteins into the following three primary gene ontology (GO) terms: In the context of gene ontology (GO) analysis, CC refers to the cellular component, MF denotes molecular function, and BP stands for biological process. In the molecular function (MF) category, the majority of CpWRKY proteins (74 out of 80) were annotated for “molecular function”, with a significant emphasis on “nucleic acid binding” and “DNA binding”. These functions are closely related to the primary roles of transcription factors (TFs), which are to regulate gene expression by binding to specific DNA sequences. In the cellular component (CC) category, the majority of CpWRKY proteins (31 out of 80) were assigned to the nucleus, which is consistent with their role as transcription factors. However, only a few CpWRKY proteins were found to be located in the cytoplasm (3 out of 80), organelle parts (CpWRKY6/7), plastids (3 out of 80), and chloroplasts (3 out of 80) (Figure S5; Supplementary Excel S5). This distribution reflects the primary function of these proteins in the nucleus, where they interact with DNA to regulate gene expression.
In terms of the BP aspect, CpWRKY proteins were found to participate in various biological processes. The largest number of CpWRKYs (74 out of 80) were annotated to be involved in multiple biosynthetic and metabolic processes (Figure S5; Supplementary Excel S5). Additionally, CpWRKY proteins were implicated in the regulation of biological processes, such as the regulation of cellular processes (74 out of 80), transcription (74 out of 80), DNA-templated processes (74 out of 80), and gene expression (74 out of 80). Furthermore, the analysis of biological processes (BP) showed that a significant number of CpWRKYs (44 out of 80) are involved in responding to stimuli, encompassing various types of biotic and abiotic stressors.
In this study, we analyzed conserved motifs in the gene promoter regions of CpWRKY genes, which act as recognition and binding sites for proteins. These cis-regulatory elements (CREs) were categorized into the following three main groups based on their functions: plant growth and development, phytohormone responsiveness, and responses to abiotic and biotic stresses (Figure 4).
This study identified multiple motifs within the CpWRKY genes, with CAT-box and O2-site being the most frequently found, associated with meristem expression and zein metabolism regulation, respectively. Other motifs related to palisade mesophyll cell differentiation (HD-Zip 1) and cell cycle regulation (MSA-like) were less prevalent. The study also discovered RY-element and GCN4-motif in the promoters of CpWRKY genes, known for seed-specific regulation and endosperm expression, respectively. Insights into the potential roles of these motifs in regulating gene expression in response to various biological processes and stress conditions were provided. Additionally, various phytohormone-responsive elements (ABRE, CGTCA-motif, TGACG-motif, and TCA element) and stress response elements (ARE, MBS, LTR, GC-motif, TC-rich, and ERE) were identified, shedding light on the potential regulatory mechanisms allowing CpWRKY genes to respond to different stimuli in plant growth, development, and stress responses.

3.7. Salinity Stress Elicits WRKY Genes’ Response in C. paliurus

Salinity stress can negatively affect the growth and development of plants. To cope with this stress and adapt to harsh conditions, plants regulate their gene expression. Previous studies have explored the role of the WRKY gene family in salinity stress in other species, such as pineapple [52]. However, there is a lack of research specifically focusing on the involvement of WRKY genes in salinity stress in C. paliurus.
To address this gap, we conducted a growth experiment under salinity stress conditions to investigate how C. paliurus responds to such stress. The results were presented in Figure 5A, which showed that the plant indeed demonstrated a response to salinity stress.
Next, we analyzed the expression changes of the WRKY gene family under salinity stress. The findings, depicted in Figure 5B, revealed that 43.8% (38) of the WRKY genes were significantly up-regulated, indicating that they play important roles in responding to salinity stress. On the other hand, 27.5% (22) of the genes were down-regulated, while 28.7% (23) showed no significant change. This suggests that salt stress alone is a potent inducer of WRKY gene expression, indicating their involvement in the plant’s response to salinity stress.

3.8. Profiling of Expressed CpWRKY Genes under Combined Salinity Stress

Jasmonates (JA), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and nitric oxide (NO) function as signaling molecules that modulate plant growth, development, and responses to environmental stresses. In this study, we aimed to investigate the response of the WRKY gene family to salinity stress in combination with the following specific stressors: Methyl jasmonate treatment (MeJA), sodium hydrosulfide treatment (NaHS), and sodium nitroprusside treatment (SNP). These treatments induce JA, H2S, and NO production, respectively. To further explore this phenomenon, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of CpWRKY gene expression patterns under various conditions using transcriptome data.
We observed that 80 CpWRKY genes were expressed under these treatments, and the combination treatment exhibited a superior capacity to induce the up-regulation of CpWRKY gene expression compared to the individual treatments (Figure S6A). For instance, when MeJA was administered alone, 26.3% (21) of CpWRKY genes showed up-regulation; however, under the combined treatment of salt and MeJA, 48.8% (39) of CpWRKY genes displayed up-regulation (Figure S6B). Similar trends were observed for NaHS, SNP, NaCl + NaHS, and NaCl + SNP treatments. As depicted in Figure S6C, only 5.0% (4) of CpWRKY genes were up-regulated under NaHS alone; nevertheless, under the combined treatment of salt and NaHS, 41.3% (33) of CpWRKY genes exhibited up-regulation. Under the SNP stress treatment condition alone, only 6.3% (5) of CpWRKY genes demonstrated up-regulation; however, under the combined treatment with salt and SNP stress conditions applied together resulted in an increase in expression levels for 50.0% (40) of CpWRKY genes (Figure S6D).
Additionally, we verified the expression patterns of 11 genes selected at random that had exhibited up-regulation in response to salt-induced stress through qRT-PCR analysis. The results obtained from qRT-PCR were consistent with those from transcriptome data. Specifically, two genes showed up-regulation under MeJA treatment, six genes were down-regulated under NaHS treatment, and three genes were down-regulated under SNP treatment. However, most of these genes demonstrated up-regulation when subjected to combined salinity stress with MeJA or NaHS or SNP treatments (Figure 6A–C).
In summary, the combined treatment exhibited an antagonistic effect on individual treatments, resulting in a significant up-regulation of CpWRKY genes. This suggests a synergistic interaction between salinity stress and other stressors in regulating the expression of these genes. These findings provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay among different stress signaling pathways and highlight the pivotal role of WRKY genes in plants’ response to salinity stress.
Overall, our study results suggest that salt stress combined with combined abiotic stressor treatment can lead to an up-regulated WRKY gene expression, emphasizing the complex and interactive nature of plant stress responses and highlighting the potential role of NASH in modulating these responses. Salt stress alone is a potent inducer of WRKY gene expression, indicating their involvement in plants’ response to salt stress.

4. Discussion

Cyclocarya paliurus (C. paliurus) has been recognized for its medicinal properties and has been used for generations in traditional Chinese medicine to treat a variety of health conditions [31,32]. The plant contains a rich array of bioactive substances, including flavonoids, polysaccharides, triterpenic acids, and essential human trace elements [29,53,54,55]. These compounds contribute to the diverse biological and physiological activities exhibited by C. paliurus, making it a valuable resource in the field of herbal medicine. One of the well-known medicinal virtues of C. paliurus is its use in managing hyperlipidemia and coronary heart disease [32,56]. Studies have shown that C. paliurus leaves possess cholesterol-lowering properties and can effectively reduce lipid levels in the blood, thereby promoting cardiovascular health [57]. Additionally, C. paliurus has been found to have anti-hyperglycemic effects, making it a potential natural remedy for managing high blood sugar levels in diabetes [58]. The plant’s polysaccharides have been studied for their antioxidant properties, helping to combat oxidative stress in the liver and kidneys. Oxidative stress can cause damage to cells and tissues, leading to various diseases, but the polysaccharides from C. paliurus have demonstrated protective effects against such stress-induced damage [59]; moreover, C. paliurus has been investigated for its potential to support the immune system. Some studies suggest that the plant’s bioactive compounds may enhance immunity, making it a promising candidate for developing immune-boosting supplements or functional foods [34]. Environmental factors may cause a decline in leaf yield and quality of C. paliurus. For example, seasonal changes affect leaf elongation and aging in Cyclocarya paliurus, as well as their effects on the accumulation of flavonoids and phenolic compounds in the leaves [60]. This paper mainly discusses the effect of salt stress on it.
Despite its remarkable medicinal properties, C. paliurus faces challenges posed by environmental stresses, particularly salinity stress. Salinity stress can negatively impact the growth of C. paliurus and, consequently, the yield and quality of its bioactive compounds. The WRKY gene family plays a pivotal role in plants’ responses to various stresses, including salinity. Although salinity is also an abiotic stress source that seriously harms plant growth and crop yield, plants have evolved corresponding protection mechanisms to cope with external hazards. For example, WRKY transcription factor participates in JA regulation pathway, regulates H2S signaling pathway and controls NO production in plants, thus enhancing plant resistance to stress. It has been reported that plants will produce NO after being harmed by salinity stress in the process of growth and development, in order to reduce the toxic effect of salting [61]. The application of artificial exogenous JA increased the antioxidant reaction of plants and alleviated the harm of salinity stress [62]. The H2S alleviates salt stress in plant by maintaining Na/K balance, regulating H2S metabolism and oxidative stress response. [63]. Moreover, in response to drought stress, tomato SlWRKY81 transcription factor attenuates the effects of drought by regulating the production of intercellular NO [64]. The transcription factor WRKY75 also plays an important role in plant defense against necrotic fungal pathogens by positively regulating the jasmonate-mediated mechanism [65]. Understanding the genetic basis of its response to salinity stress, especially the role of the WRKY gene family, can offer insights into potential strategies for protecting this valuable medicinal plant and harnessing its therapeutic potential.
This study delves into the WRKY gene family, a large group of transcription factors found in all plant species, with a focus on Cyclocarya paliurus (C. paliurus). We identified 80 WRKY genes in the C. paliurus genome, named CpWRKY1 to CpWRKY80 based on their chromosomal locations. Two of these genes, CpWRKY55 and CpWRKY56, showed sequence variations in their WRKY domains, suggesting potential differences in their interactions with downstream target genes.
The study also explored the evolution of the WRKY gene family. Unlike many monocotyledons, such as rice and maize, where a loss of WRKY domain is common, all group I WRKY proteins in C. paliurus have two domains, indicating unique evolutionary characteristics. The number of WRKY genes in C. paliurus is comparatively fewer than other sequenced monocot genomes, suggesting that duplication events have played a significant role in the expansion of the WRKY gene family.
The study also indicated that group III WRKY genes, which are thought to be the most advanced in terms of evolution, diversified prior to the divergence of monocots and dicots. This group’s size variation could be a potential cause for the diversity of the WRKY gene family size. Interestingly, C. paliurus has more group III WRKY genes than most other dicots, but without a lineage-specific radiation, possibly due to different duplication patterns.
We also investigated the expression patterns of the CpWRKY gene, revealing their potential role in physiological processes and stress responses. For instance, 95% of WRKY genes showed altered expression under NaCl stress, with eleven genes significantly up-regulated. These genes, mainly from group II, may play a key role in coping with salinity stress. In conclusion, this comprehensive analysis of the WRKY gene family in C. paliurus provides valuable insights into their potential functional roles and evolutionary characteristics. We explored the importance of the health benefits of C. paliurus and the regulatory mechanisms of the WRKY gene in a plant’s response to salt stress. It is a good way to know that regulating the WRKY gene can improve the salt tolerance of C. paliurus and increase the quality of its accessory products. Therefore, studying the WRKY gene aims to address the challenge of breeding a valuable resource, C. paliurus, under adverse conditions. These findings could guide further research into the genetic improvement of C. paliurus, particularly in terms of environmental resistance and agronomic traits.

5. Conclusions

This study provides a detailed analysis of the WRKY gene family in the medicinal plant, Cyclocarya paliurus. We identified 80 CpWRKY genes and investigated their response to salinity stress and specific stressors. Our findings revealed that combined treatments were more effective in inducing gene expression than individual treatments. The study enhances our understanding of the potential roles of WRKY genes in C. paliurus under environmental stress conditions, paving the way for future research into their functional roles in plant growth, development, and stress response.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f14091771/s1, Supplementary File S1: The coding sequence (CDS) sequences of 80 CpWRKY genes in Cyclocarya paliurus. Supplementary File S2: One-to-one orthologous relationships between C. paliurus and two other plant species. Supplementary Excel S1: List of the 80 CpWRKY genes identified in this study. Supplementary Excel S2: Analysis and distribution of conserved motifs in C. paliurus WRKY proteins. Supplementary Excel S3: List of WRKY III genes identified in Pineapple, Rice, Maize, Populus, Grape, Arabidopsis, and C. paliurus, along with their seven sequence characteristics. Supplementary Excel S4: Segmentally and tandemly duplicated CpWRKY gene pairs. Supplementary Excel S5: Gene ontology (GO) distribution of CpWRKY proteins, including molecular function (MF), biological process (BP), and cellular component (CC). Supplementary Figure S1: Chromosomal locations of the CpWRKY genes in C. paliurus based on their physical positions. Supplementary Figure S2: Alignment of multiple CpWRKY and selected AtWRKY domain amino acid sequences, showing the N-terminal and C-terminal WRKY domain of each protein. Supplementary Figure S3: Phylogenetic relationships and motif compositions of group III WRKY proteins from seven different plant species, presented as an unrooted phylogenetic tree and distribution of conserved motifs in the WRKY proteins. Supplementary Figure S4: Schematic representations of the chromosomal distribution and inter chromosomal relationships of C. paliurus WRKY genes, including synteny blocks and duplicated WRKY gene pairs. Supplementary Figure S5: Gene ontology (GO) distribution of CpWRKY proteins, displaying the predominant GO items. Supplementary Figure S6: Clustering expression analysis of 80 CpWRKY genes in different stress treatments based on pot experiments, showing the normalized transcript abundance levels in different treatments.

Author Contributions

Z.Y. and K.L. designed the research. Z.Y., F.H., S.F., N.Z. and Y.A. performed the study. Z.Y., M.T., F.H. and K.L. analyzed the data. Z.Y., F.H. and K.L. wrote the manuscript, K.L. revised the manuscript. per. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by Guizhou Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Department of Education [2022]077, the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Karst Science Research Center of Guizhou Province (grant number U1812401), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31600214 and 32360074).

Data Availability Statement

All data are available upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

C. paliurusCyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja
MeJAMethyl jasmonate
NaHSSodium hydrosulfide
SNPSodium nitroprusside
JAJasmonates
H2SHydrogen sulfide
NONitric oxide
HMMMarkov models
GSDSGene Structure Display Server
NJNeighbor-Joining
NCBINational Center for Biotechnology Information
RPKMReads per kilobase of transcript, per million mapped reads
FPKMFragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads
GOGene ontology
CDSCoding sequence
MWMolecular weight
pIIsoelectric point
aaAmino acids
CCCellular component
MFMolecular function
BPBiological process
CREscis-regulatory elements

References

  1. Bekir, Ü.; Imre, E.S. WRKY transcription factors: From DNA binding towards biological function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brand, L.H.; Fischer, N.M.; Harter, K.; Kohlbacher, O.; Wanke, D. Elucidating the evolutionary conserved DNA-binding specificities of WRKY transcription factors by molecular dynamics and in vitro binding assays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 9764–9778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: Its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. Bmc Evol Biol 2005, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiang, Y.; Liang, G.; Yang, S.; Yu, D. Arabidopsis WRKY57 Functions as a Node of Convergence for Jasmonic Acid- and Auxin-Mediated Signaling in Jasmonic Acid-Induced Leaf Senescence. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 230–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, Y.; Feng, C.; Ye, Q.; Wu, W.; Chen, Y. Arabidopsis WRKY6 Transcription Factor Acts as a Positive Regulator of Abscisic Acid Signaling during Seed Germination and Early Seedling Development. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grunewald, W.; De Smet, I.; De Rybel, B.; Robert, H.S.; van de Cotte, B.; Willemsen, V.; Gheysen, G.; Weijers, D.; Friml, J.; Beeckman, T. Tightly controlled WRKY23 expression mediates Arabidopsis embryo development. Embo Rep. 2013, 14, 1136–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, M.; Yan, T.; Shen, Q.; Lu, X.; Pan, Q.; Huang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Fu, X.; Liu, M.; Jiang, W.; et al. GLANDULAR TRICHOME-SPECIFIC WRKY 1 promotes artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, Y.; Hu, R.; Wang, H.; Cao, Y.; He, G.; Fu, C.; Zhou, G. MlWRKY12, a novel Miscanthus transcription factor, participates in pith secondary cell wall formation and promotes flowering. Plant Sci. 2013, 212, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, W.; Wang, H.; Yu, D. The Arabidopsis WRKY transcription factors WRKY12 and WRKY13 oppositely regulate flowering under short-day conditions. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1492–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ye, J.; Wang, X.; Hu, T.; Zhang, F.; Wang, B.; Li, C.; Yang, T.; Li, H.; Lu, Y.; Giovannoni, J.J.; et al. An InDel in the Promoter ofAl-ACTIVATED MALATE TRANSPORTER9 Selected during Tomato Domestication Determines Fruit Malate Contents and Aluminum Tolerance. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 2249–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Amato, A.; Cavallini, E.; Zenoni, S.; Finezzo, L.; Begheldo, M.; Ruperti, B.; Tornielli, G.B. A Grapevine TTG2-Like WRKY Transcription Factor Is Involved in Regulating Vacuolar Transport and Flavonoid Biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gonzalez, A.; Brown, M.; Hatlestad, G.; Akhavan, N.; Smith, T.; Hembd, A.; Moore, J.; Montes, D.; Mosley, T.; Resendez, J.; et al. TTG2 controls the developmental regulation of seed coat tannins in Arabidopsis by regulating vacuolar transport steps in the proanthocyanidin pathway. Dev. Biol. 2016, 419, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mirabella, R.; Rauwerda, H.; Allmann, S.; Scala, A.; Spyropoulou, E.A.; de Vries, M.; Boersma, M.R.; Breit, T.M.; Haring, M.A.; Schuurink, R.C. WRKY40 and WRKY6 act downstream of the green leaf volatileE-2-hexenal in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015, 83, 1082–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, H.; Yang, W.; Liu, D.; Han, Y.; Zhang, A.; Li, S. Ectopic expression of a grapevine transcription factor VvWRKY11 contributes to osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Devaiah, B.N.; Karthikeyan, A.S.; Raghothama, K.G. WRKY75 Transcription Factor Is a Modulator of Phosphate Acquisition and Root Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1789–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bo, C.; Cai, R.; Fang, X.; Wu, H.; Ma, Z.; Yuan, H.; Cheng, B.; Fan, J.; Ma, Q. Transcription factor ZmWRKY20 interacts with ZmWRKY115 to repress expression of ZmbZIP111 for salt tolerance in maize. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2022, 111, 1660–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nan, H.; Lin, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, H.; Li, W.; Gao, L. Genome-Wide Analysis of the WRKY Transcription Factor Gene Family and Their Response to Salt Stress in Rubber Tree. Trop. Plant Biol. 2021, 14, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, J.; Ma, S.; Ye, N.; Jiang, M.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rushton, P.J.; Somssich, I.E.; Ringler, P.; Shen, Q.J. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rushton, D.L.; Tripathi, P.; Rabara, R.C.; Lin, J.; Ringler, P.; Boken, A.K.; Langum, T.J.; Smidt, L.; Boomsma, D.D.; Emme, N.J.; et al. WRKY transcription factors: Key components in abscisic acid signalling. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2012, 10, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yuan, H.; Guo, W.; Zhao, L.; Yu, Y.; Chen, S.; Tao, L.; Cheng, L.; Kang, Q.; Song, X.; Wu, J.; et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the WRKY transcription factor family in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Oku, H.; Nahar, K.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Mahmud, J.A.; Baluska, F.; Fujita, M. Nitric oxide-induced salt stress tolerance in plants: ROS metabolism, signaling, and molecular interactions. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2018, 12, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kamińska, M. Role and activity of jasmonates in plants under in vitro conditions. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2021, 146, 425–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Larrieu, A.; Vernoux, T. Q&A: How does jasmonate signaling enable plants to adapt and survive? BMC Biol. 2016, 14, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xuan, L.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, C. Crosstalk between Hydrogen Sulfide and Other Signal Molecules Regulates Plant Growth and Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Karle, S.B.; Guru, A.; Dwivedi, P.; Kumar, K. Insights into the Role of Gasotransmitters Mediating Salt Stress Responses in Plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 2259–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, Z.; Xiong, M.; Yan Jian, S.F.; Luo, S.; An, Y.; Li, K.; Yi, Y. Transcriptome Analysis of ER Stress-related Genes and Validation of Reference Genes in Gene Expression RT-qPCR for Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2019, 22, 1588–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, J.; Wang, W.; Dong, C.; Huang, L.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Nie, S.; Xie, M. Protective effect of flavonoids from Cyclocarya paliurus leaves against carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. Int. J. Publ. Br. Ind. Biol. Res. Assoc. 2018, 119, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. SUN, T.; ABLAEV, A.G.; WANG, Y.; LI, C. Cyclocarya cf. paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja (Juglandaceae) from the Hunchun Formation (Eocene), Jilin Province, China. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2005, 47, 1281–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zheng, X.; Xiao, H.; Chen, J.; Zhu, J.; Fu, Y.; Ouyang, S.; Chen, Y.; Chen, D.; Su, J.; Xue, T. Metabolome and Whole-Transcriptome Analyses Reveal the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Hypoglycemic Nutrient Metabolites Biosynthesis in Cyclocarya paliurus Leaves During Different Harvest Stages. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 851569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shen, Y.; Peng, Y.; Zhu, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Kong, F.; Wang, J.; Yu, D. The phytochemicals and health benefits of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batalin) Iljinskaja. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1158158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, H.; Tang, C.; Gao, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wei, J.; Zhao, L.; Tong, X. Potential Role of Natural Plant Medicine Cyclocarya paliurus in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Diabetes Res. 2021, 2021, 1655336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, Z.; Jian, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wu, J.; Sheng, W.; Jiang, S.; Shehla, N.; Aman, S.; Wang, W. Cyclocarya paliurus (Batalin) Iljinskaja: Botany, Ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 285, 114912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, S.; Liu, Y.; Shang, X. Metabolome and Transcriptome Analyses Unravel the Molecular Regulatory Mechanisms Involved in Photosynthesis of Cyclocarya paliurus under Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Shang, X.; Fang, S. Identification and Expression Analysis of R2R3-MYB Family Genes Associated with Salt Tolerance in Cyclocarya paliurus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, Z.T.; Fan, S.X.; Li, R.; Huang, T.M.; An, Y.; Guo, Z.Q.; Li, F.; Yi, Y.; Li, K. The optimal reference gene validation in Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja under environmental stresses. Agron. J. 2022, 114, 2044–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, Z.; Fan, S.; Shen, Y.; Shi, W.; Huang, T.; An, Y.; Li, K. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase (CDPK) Gene Families in Cyclocarya paliurus. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Shenzhen, China, 8–11 August 2022. [Google Scholar]
  39. Guo, A.Y.; Zhu, Q.H.; Chen, X.; Luo, J.C. GSDS:a gene structure display server. Yi Chuan. 2007, 29, 1023–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; DeBarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, C.; Xie, T.; Chen, C.; Luan, A.; Long, J.; Li, C.; Ding, Y.; He, Y. Genome-wide organization and expression profiling of the R2R3-MYB transcription factor family in pineapple (Ananas comosus). BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thulin, M.; Moore, A.J.; El-Seedi, H.; Larsson, A.; Christin, P.; Edwards, E.J. Phylogeny and generic delimitation in Molluginaceae, new pigment data in Caryophyllales, and the new family Corbichoniaceae. Taxon 2016, 65, 775–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ross, C.A.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Q.J. The WRKY Gene Family in Rice (Oryza sativa). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 827–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Group, R.W.W. Nomenclature report on rice WRKY’s-Conflict regarding gene names and its solution. Rice 2012, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Conesa, A.; Götz, S.; García-Gómez, J.M.; Terol, J.; Talón, M.; Robles, M. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3674–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Quinlan, A.R.; Hall, I.M. BEDTools: A flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 841–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wei, K.F.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.F.; Wu, L.J.; Xie, D.X. Molecular Phylogenetic and Expression Analysis of the Complete WRKY Transcription Factor Family in Maize. Dna Res. 2012, 19, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.; Feng, L.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yan, H.; Xiang, Y. Comparative genomic analysis of the WRKY III gene family in populus, grape, arabidopsis and rice. Biol. Direct. 2015, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xie, T.; Chen, C.; Li, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; He, Y. Genome-wide investigation of WRKY gene family in pineapple: Evolution and expression profiles during development and stress. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yao, Y.; Yan, L.; Chen, H.; Wu, N.; Wang, W.; Wang, D. Cyclocarya paliurus polysaccharides alleviate type 2 diabetic symptoms by modulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids. Phytomedicine 2020, 77, 153268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, S.; Fang, S.; Zhu, L.; Song, Z.; Shang, X.; Fang, S.; Pan, K.; Cao, X.; et al. New triterpenoids from the Cyclocarya paliurus (Batalin) Iljinskaja and their anti-fibrotic activity. Phytochemistry 2022, 204, 113434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xie, J.; Shen, M.; Nie, S.; Liu, X.; Yin, J.; Huang, D.; Zhang, H.; Xie, M. Simultaneous analysis of 18 mineral elements in Cyclocarya paliurus polysaccharide by ICP-AES. Carbohyd Polym. 2013, 94, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yao, X.; Lin, Z.; Jiang, C.; Gao, M.; Wang, Q.; Yao, N.; Ma, Y.; Li, Y.; Fang, S.; Shang, X.; et al. Cyclocarya paliurus prevents high fat diet induced hyperlipidemia and obesity in Sprague-Dawley rats. Can. J. Physiol. Pharm. 2015, 93, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiang, C.; Wang, Q.; Wei, Y.; Yao, N.; Wu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Lin, Z.; Zhao, M.; Che, C.; Yao, X.; et al. Cholesterol-lowering effects and potential mechanisms of different polar extracts from Cyclocarya paliurus leave in hyperlipidemic mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 176, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Feng, Z.; Fang, Z.; Chen, C.; Vong, C.T.; Chen, J.; Lou, R.; Hoi, M.P.M.; Gan, L.; Lin, L. Anti-Hyperglycemic Effects of Refined Fractions from Cyclocarya paliurus Leaves on Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice. Molecules 2021, 26, 6886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, T.; Shen, M.; Liu, S.; Yu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Xie, J. Ameliorative effect of Cyclocarya paliurus polysaccharides against carbon tetrachloride induced oxidative stress in liver and kidney of mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. Int. J. Publ. Br. Ind. Biol. Res. Assoc. 2020, 135, 111014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, C.; Shang, X.; Ding, H.; Cao, Y.; Fang, S. Natural variations in flavonoids and triterpenoids of Cyclocarya paliurus leaves. J For. Res. 2021, 32, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shang, J.; Li, X.; Li, C.; Zhao, L. The Role of Nitric Oxide in Plant Responses to Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, Y.; Yang, X.; Guo, X.; Hu, X.; Dong, D.; Li, G.; Xiong, X. Exogenously applied methyl Jasmonate induces early defense related genes in response to Phytophthora infestans infection in potato plants. Hortic. Plant J. 2022, 8, 511–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jiang, J.; Ren, X.; Li, L.; Hou, R.; Sun, W.; Jiao, C.; Yang, N.; Dong, Y. H2S Regulation of Metabolism in Cucumber in Response to Salt-Stress Through Transcriptome and Proteome Analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ahammed, G.J.; Li, X.; Mao, Q.; Wan, H.; Zhou, G.; Cheng, Y. The SlWRKY81 transcription factor inhibits stomatal closure by attenuating nitric oxide accumulation in the guard cells of tomato under drought. Physiol. Plantarum. 2021, 172, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Xiang, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yu, D. The transcription factor WRKY75 positively regulates jasmonate-mediated plant defense to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 1473–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree representing relationships among WRKY domains of Cyclocarya paliurus (C. paliurus) and Arabidopsis. The different-colored graths indicate different groups (or subgroups) of WRKY domains. WRKY proteins from Arabidopsis with the prefix ‘At’ indicate ‘AtWRKY’.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree representing relationships among WRKY domains of Cyclocarya paliurus (C. paliurus) and Arabidopsis. The different-colored graths indicate different groups (or subgroups) of WRKY domains. WRKY proteins from Arabidopsis with the prefix ‘At’ indicate ‘AtWRKY’.
Forests 14 01771 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships, gene structure, and architecture of conserved protein motifs in WRKY genes from C. paliurus. (a) The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the full-length sequences of C. paliurus WRKY proteins using MEGA 5 software. (b) Exon–intron structure of C. paliurus WRKY genes of structures. Green boxes indicate exons; black lines indicate introns. The WRKY domains are highlighted by yellow boxes. The number indicates the phases of corresponding introns. (c) The motif composition of C. paliurus WRKY proteins. The number indicates the phases of corresponding introns. The motifs, numbers 1–20, are displayed in different colored boxes. The sequence information for each motif is provided in Supplementary Excel S2. The length of protein can be estimated using the scale at the bottom.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships, gene structure, and architecture of conserved protein motifs in WRKY genes from C. paliurus. (a) The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the full-length sequences of C. paliurus WRKY proteins using MEGA 5 software. (b) Exon–intron structure of C. paliurus WRKY genes of structures. Green boxes indicate exons; black lines indicate introns. The WRKY domains are highlighted by yellow boxes. The number indicates the phases of corresponding introns. (c) The motif composition of C. paliurus WRKY proteins. The number indicates the phases of corresponding introns. The motifs, numbers 1–20, are displayed in different colored boxes. The sequence information for each motif is provided in Supplementary Excel S2. The length of protein can be estimated using the scale at the bottom.
Forests 14 01771 g002
Figure 3. Synteny analysis of WRKY genes between C. paliurus and two representative plant species. Gray lines in the background indicate the collinear blocks within C. paliurus and other plant genomes, while the red lines highlight the syntenic WRKY gene pairs. The specie names with the prefixes ‘C. paliurus’, ‘A. thaliana’, and ‘O. sativa’ indicate Cyclocarya paliurus, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Oryza sativa, respectively.
Figure 3. Synteny analysis of WRKY genes between C. paliurus and two representative plant species. Gray lines in the background indicate the collinear blocks within C. paliurus and other plant genomes, while the red lines highlight the syntenic WRKY gene pairs. The specie names with the prefixes ‘C. paliurus’, ‘A. thaliana’, and ‘O. sativa’ indicate Cyclocarya paliurus, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Oryza sativa, respectively.
Forests 14 01771 g003
Figure 4. Cis-regulatory elements in the promoter region of CpWRKY genes. The figure represents the number of each type of motifs identified in the promoter sequence of CpWRKY genes.
Figure 4. Cis-regulatory elements in the promoter region of CpWRKY genes. The figure represents the number of each type of motifs identified in the promoter sequence of CpWRKY genes.
Forests 14 01771 g004
Figure 5. Clustering expression analysis of 80 CpWRKY genes in different stress treatments based on the pot experiments. (A) Phenotypes of C. paliurus seedlings at the various time under salt treatments of the pot experiment. (B) The CK (control), T (0.4% NaCl) represent the two different treatments. The transcript abundance level was normalized and hierarchically clustered by using the log 2 (FPKM + 1) comparison among genes of different treatments. The expression value is presented on the color scale, with red representing high expression and blue representing low expression.
Figure 5. Clustering expression analysis of 80 CpWRKY genes in different stress treatments based on the pot experiments. (A) Phenotypes of C. paliurus seedlings at the various time under salt treatments of the pot experiment. (B) The CK (control), T (0.4% NaCl) represent the two different treatments. The transcript abundance level was normalized and hierarchically clustered by using the log 2 (FPKM + 1) comparison among genes of different treatments. The expression value is presented on the color scale, with red representing high expression and blue representing low expression.
Forests 14 01771 g005
Figure 6. Expression profiles of the 11 candidate CpWRKY genes responding in different stress treatments. (A) Expression profiles of CpWRKY genes responding under 0.2 mM MeJA and T + MeJA (0.4% NaCl with 0.2 mM MeJA) stress treatments. (B) Expression tendency of CpWRKY genes responding under 0.5 mM NaHS and T + NaHS (0.4% NaCl with 0.5 mM NaHS) stress treatments. (C) Expression tendency of CpWRKY genes responding under 0.25 mM SNP and T + SNP (0.4% NaCl with 0.25 mM SNP) stress treatments. The standard errors from three biological and three technical replications are presented as error bars. Following analysis of variance, significant differences identified by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05), using SPSS v.22, are represented by different letters.
Figure 6. Expression profiles of the 11 candidate CpWRKY genes responding in different stress treatments. (A) Expression profiles of CpWRKY genes responding under 0.2 mM MeJA and T + MeJA (0.4% NaCl with 0.2 mM MeJA) stress treatments. (B) Expression tendency of CpWRKY genes responding under 0.5 mM NaHS and T + NaHS (0.4% NaCl with 0.5 mM NaHS) stress treatments. (C) Expression tendency of CpWRKY genes responding under 0.25 mM SNP and T + SNP (0.4% NaCl with 0.25 mM SNP) stress treatments. The standard errors from three biological and three technical replications are presented as error bars. Following analysis of variance, significant differences identified by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05), using SPSS v.22, are represented by different letters.
Forests 14 01771 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Z.; He, F.; An, Y.; Zhang, N.; Fan, S.; Tang, M.; Li, K. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Salt Tolerance-Associated WRKY Family Genes in Cyclocarya paliurus. Forests 2023, 14, 1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091771

AMA Style

Yang Z, He F, An Y, Zhang N, Fan S, Tang M, Li K. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Salt Tolerance-Associated WRKY Family Genes in Cyclocarya paliurus. Forests. 2023; 14(9):1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091771

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Zhengting, Fayin He, Yin An, Nannan Zhang, Sixian Fan, Ming Tang, and Kun Li. 2023. "Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Salt Tolerance-Associated WRKY Family Genes in Cyclocarya paliurus" Forests 14, no. 9: 1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091771

APA Style

Yang, Z., He, F., An, Y., Zhang, N., Fan, S., Tang, M., & Li, K. (2023). Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Salt Tolerance-Associated WRKY Family Genes in Cyclocarya paliurus. Forests, 14(9), 1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091771

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop