Next Article in Journal
Trends in Brazil’s Forestry Education—Part 3: Employment Patterns of Forest Engineering Graduates from Two Public Universities in the Last 15 Years
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Quality Evaluation of Typical Vegetation and Their Response to Precipitation in Loess Hilly and Gully Areas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Energy, Dynamic and Economic Balance of Chipping Operation in Poplar Medium Rotation Coppice (MRC) Plantations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Charcoal Trade in Niger—Product Flows and Business Models

1
Département Génie Rural, Eaux et Forêts, Faculté d’Agronomie, Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey, Niamey BP 10960, Niger
2
African Forest Forum (AFF), Nairobi P.O. Box 30677-00100, Kenya
3
Kenya Forestry Research Institute, Taita Taveta Research Centre, Wundanyi P.O. Box 1206-80304, Kenya
4
Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7060, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(9), 1910; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091910
Submission received: 18 August 2023 / Revised: 15 September 2023 / Accepted: 15 September 2023 / Published: 19 September 2023

Abstract

:
Charcoal is used in Africa for household energy, and the sector involves different actors with specific business strategies. Based on theories on sustainable business models and livelihoods, charcoal traders in five cities in Niger were surveyed about supply chains and strategies. Most charcoal is imported from Nigeria, and smaller quantities come from Benin and Burkina Faso or domestically. Men dominate the trade. Customers value charcoal quality, tree species, packaging, and low prices. Three groups of traders and their business models were identified: small-scale retailers, large-scale retailers, and wholesalers. The charcoal trade is typically combined with trade in other products and is frequently conducted with family members or friends; laborers are employed for loading and unloading. The charcoal business provides a complementary income for the traders’ livelihoods. Most respondents believed that trade would increase in the future; wholesalers expected promising future business opportunities. This study concludes that improvements should focus on quality, better marketing skills, and more sustainable charcoal sourcing. Charcoal use in the Sahel region of Africa should also be studied further to enable the development of effective policies in the West African bioenergy sector. The cross-border charcoal trade creates a need for coordinated policies for a sustainable charcoal sector in the Sahel region.

1. Introduction

Charcoal is an important energy source across Africa, and the continent accounts for 65% of its global production [1,2]. Since charcoal contains approximately 1.7 times more energy than firewood per unit weight, it is suitable for long-distance trade [1,3]; hence, the charcoal trade can be observed from production sites in forested regions to places where markets can be found.
Aspects of charcoal production, commerce, and significance for livelihoods in Africa have been analyzed in previous studies [4,5]; however, the charcoal trade in the western Sahel region (Senegal, Gambia, Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger) is not so adequately described. This part of Africa, characterized by low rainfall and with a considerable population of 90 million, is highly dependent on biomass for household energy needs. This biomass includes, to an important degree, charcoal, and the consumption of this energy carrier in the region is on the rise (p. 82, [1,6]). Ouedraogo [7] documented that a section of the more well-off households in Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso frequently used charcoal alongside fuelwood for energy; however, the study did not trace the origin of the charcoal quantities. The charcoal trade from the north of Ghana, a West African country, to the demand centers in the southern region of the country has been studied [8,9]. Moreover, the importance of the charcoal trade in Africa, including the Sahel, has been examined and described by Nyarko et al. [10]. Despite previous studies, detailed information about product flows and involved actors in the Sahel is still in part lacking.
Charcoal production and trade across Africa mainly operate in the informal sector; therefore, the business practices and actors involved are not well documented in official reports and statistics [1,11]. Nonetheless, business strategies among producers have been published in individual studies from the Democratic Republic of Congo [4], Uganda [12], Kenya [13,14], Malawi [15,16], and Ghana [8,9]. These studies generally characterize the charcoal sector as having low entry barriers with thin profit margins, even though the research distinguishes a few powerful large-scale market players [5,14,17]. According to Ihalainen et al. [18], women are more frequently engaged in retailing than in production and transport, and they generally capture smaller benefits than their male colleagues.
Another area of research has focused on the sector’s sustainability implications, including its impact on livelihoods and forest conditions [14,19,20,21]. This literature suggests that the charcoal sector can trigger forest degradation and deforestation that impacts carbon flow and biodiversity, with consequences for the sustainable development goals (SDGs) 13 (climate action) and 15 (life on land). Conversely, the charcoal sector benefits low-income households and indirectly affects poverty, food security, and schooling by providing means to cover school fees, consequently supporting SDGs 1 (no poverty), 2 (no hunger), and 4 (quality education).
The extant literature suggests policy interventions to improve the sustainability of the charcoal sector, including mobilization of charcoal producers for sustainable practices, development of more efficient production, formalizations of the sector, and community participation [1,11]. However, further improvements in the charcoal sector in the Sahel are hampered by knowledge gaps concerning traders both at the wholesale and retail stages. Insights about value streams, business practices, resource use, and marketing strategies are crucial for policies aiming to improve the sector’s long-term viability. Together with insights into charcoal production, knowledge of the trade at both the wholesale and retail levels would enable the development of regulatory and trade policies and inclusive actions to improve the sector’s contribution to livelihoods and sustainable development. Otherwise, less appropriate practices and regulations risk leading to wasteful and unsustainable production and use [1,2,22]. Therefore, this study had three research objectives:
  • Analyze the product flows of the charcoal trade in southern Niger.
  • Characterize the charcoal traders’ business model and their strategic considerations.
  • Indicate key sustainability implications of charcoal trade regarding livelihoods and the environment.
The subsequent section presents the methods applied in this study, including the conceptual framework and the research approach. The results section describes the findings and subsequently a discussion of their implications. The final section presents this study’s conclusions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Conceptual Framework

The analysis in this study was based on the sustainable business model (SBM) concept [13,23], which draws on the widely applied business model canvas (here labeled as “the basic business model”) describing a company’s configuration of value propositions, value delivery, and economic value capture [24,25]. The SBM complements this basic business model with sustainability considerations. “A sustainable business model is about creating significantly increased positive effects and/or significantly reduced negative effects for the natural environment and society through changes in the way a company and its network create, deliver, and capture value” [24]. Sustainability, or SDG-progress, also influences business models through feedback loops as the forest resource is declining. Furthermore, this inquiry refers to the sustainable livelihood framework, particularly for indicating the SBM’s linkages with livelihood outcomes [26]. The conceptual model epitomizes the research objectives on trade flows, business models, and sustainability aspects of the charcoal trade (Figure 1).
Figure 1 shows that for charcoal traders, the basic business model comprises the value proposition (product values and customer segments), value creation and delivery (key activities, resources, partnerships, and channels involved in the trade), and economic value capture (economic costs and benefits). The business model also consists of charcoal sourcing and sale, which, when aggregated, generate product flows (corresponding to the research question RQ 1). The wider red circle in Figure 1 indicates the overall sustainable business model (corresponding to RQ2). The activity’s specific sustainability impacts and feedback loops (Blue arrows in Figure 1) refer to the research question (RQ3).
The outline of the research Is shown In Figure 2.

2.2. Research Approach

2.2.1. General Approach

This study was designed as a semi-structured survey, which is the most appropriate approach to document and describe product flows, business models, strategies, and sustainability and livelihood implications [27]. A survey was conducted in October and November 2019 among charcoal traders along the charcoal supply chain in the five cities of Dosso, Gaya, Birni-N’Konni, Maradi, and Niamey (Table 1 and Figure 3) in the most populated southern part of Niger. These cities are among the ten largest cities in Niger (Niamey and Maradi are the first and second largest cities in Niger, respectively); and the administrative regions where the cities are located contain 58% of the country’s population. The selection of sites was determined by security considerations, which necessitated the exclusion of investigations in rural areas and cities with unstable security status in eastern and northern Niger and along the border with Mali. The vast northern parts of the country consist of deserts and are very sparsely populated.

2.2.2. Charcoal and Household Energy in Niger

Niger faces substantial energy needs and widespread poverty among the rural and urban population. The country has a forest cover of less than 1% of the land area, and 80% of the surface consists of deserts and dry vegetation. The population of 23.3 million people is growing rapidly at a rate of 3.8% annually, and 16% live in cities. The average age of 15 years is low, even in comparison with other countries on the world’s youngest continent. Four-fifths of the population lack access to electricity, and 98% cannot use clean cooking methods [6,28,29]. Biomass represents 77% of the country’s total energy supply and dominates household energy use [28,30]. Accordingly, the annual charcoal use in Niger in 2019 was estimated to be 772,000 metric tons, which is an increase of 82% from 2000 [3]. Despite its high importance for a large proportion of the population, recent research about charcoal energy use and how this demand is met is limited [30].

2.2.3. Data Collection and Analysis

To acquire an updated overview of the charcoal market, a workshop was organized in October 2019 in Niamey. It brought together 23 stakeholders with specific roles and insights about bioenergy and charcoal use in Niger, including charcoal traders, researchers, representatives of environmental non-governmental organizations, ministry officials, and delegates from the private sector. The outcome was documented in “Rapport de l’atelier de concertation des parties prenantes du projet sur les modèles commerciaux de chaîne de valeur des produits forestiers,” which can be provided upon request.
Survey questions were based on this study’s objectives, the literature cited above, the framework (Figure 1), and the workshop outcomes. The questions were written in French, and their topic areas are shown in Figure 4. An English translation of the questionnaire is presented in Appendix A.
Four enumerators (one female and three males) were engaged in the interviews. They hold college diplomas and are fluent in French, Hausa, and Djerma; the latter two languages are the most diffused in the study area. The enumerators were trained for one day. The questionnaire was also pretested, and minor corrections were made (p. 262, [27]).
For each location, charcoal trader interviewees were selected randomly along the main roads traversing the city. Participation was based on informed consent and anonymity. Furthermore, this study observed the ethical guidelines in [31]. Interviews were held in the local languages and lasted for about 30 min each, and answers were translated from the local language into French and entered into Excel spreadsheets for analysis.
The collected data were analyzed statistically with Excel 2016 and IBM SPSS Statistics version 29 software. Statistics in the form of parameters and distributions were calculated or estimated for the whole sample and segments thereof. Post hoc ANOVA tests of means and Z-tests for independent proportions were performed, in both cases, together with Bonferroni corrections to avoid incorrect rejection of a null hypothesis (p. 440, [32]). Moreover, subgroup means were also analyzed with nonparametric methods.
The empirical estimation of differences and distributions included weights assigned to every response (Equation (1)). Proportional weights (w) assigned to each respondent within the sample of size n in city c are represented as follows:
w c = p c   c = 1 5 p c   n c 1
where pc represents the population per city based on the most recent 2012 census. The findings could not be generalized into total quantities because the total number of traders is unknown. National proportions were instead conducted based on the total charcoal consumption in Niger [3].
The respondents were divided into three classes based on their size and business characteristics: small, medium retailers, and wholesalers. Wholesalers were identified as respondents that sold most of their products to retailers. The retailers had end-users as their primary customer group. Consequently, retailers were divided into two quantiles according to sales quantities. This segmentation was based on previous charcoal studies, which found that customer segments and quantities were expected to influence business practices [5,8,17,33]. When the trade flows were calculated, wholesalers were removed to avoid double counting, i.e., to avoid counting the same quantities in the retail and wholesale stages.

3. Results

3.1. The Sample

In total, 347 interviews were conducted at five locations (Table 1 above). Information about the profile of the weighted sample is listed in Table 2.
Table 2 provides a sample overview based on weighted values.
Most respondents were male. The female representation was the lowest in Maradi (4.7%) and Niamey (11.8%) and the highest in Gaya (28.6%) and Dosso (22.2%).
A large share were small retail traders, whereas a minority handled larger wholesale quantities. The age of the traders varied, with an average age of 40.8 years, indicating that the charcoal trade is not an occupation for youth. Most interviewees perceived the charcoal trade as part-time, combined with the trade of other goods, e.g., food items. One-fifth of the respondents answered that the charcoal trade was their main occupation (highest in Maradi with 26.7%, and lowest in Gaya with 15.8%). Thus, in most cases, the charcoal trade was combined with commerce in other items, restaurants, or other businesses. Only a few respondents combined trading charcoal with farming or other salaried employment.

3.2. Trade Flows

The results also revealed that over 73.6% of the charcoal was imported. Nigeria is the primary source of charcoal, whereas Burkina Faso and Benin serve markets that are situated closest to the respective country borders (Table 3 and Figure 5). Domestic production accounted for less than a third of the charcoal that retailers sold.
The weighted quantities indicate that the five cities source most of their charcoal from Nigeria, Burkina Faso, and domestically. Niamey features diverse supply sources, where substantial quantities are bought from Nigeria, Burkina Faso, and Niger, whereas Maradi and Konni are more dependent on Nigeria for charcoal. Benin supplies some proportion of the consumption in Dosso and Gaya. However, these quantities represent small shares of the total consumption. This study shows that if the total sourcing shares are similar to the country totals [3], the total import quantities would consist of 354,348 tons from Nigeria, 186,052 tons from Burkina Faso, 11,580 tons from Benin, and 219,248 tons from Niger [3].
Table 4 lists key figures about the countries supplying charcoal to Niger. The group of countries faces similar challenges to meet the needs of growing populations and to protect the environment.
Niger and its neighbors have growing populations, potentially creating an increasing demand for forest products in the region, specifically for wood energy (Table 4). All four countries also recorded a decreasing forest area between 2010 and 2020. Furthermore, poverty rates are also high. These challenges indicate difficulties in the four countries in meeting the Agenda 2030 goals regarding life on land and no poverty [34].
The traded quantities for the three categories are shown in Table 5.
The overall high share of small-scale traders selling less than 20 bags per month reflects the normal distribution situation in emerging economies where consumers do not have transport availability to frequent larger retailing centers (p. 117, [35]).
Table 6 lists the traded quantities divided into supplier categories used by different trader types.
Small- and medium-scale producers purchased most of their charcoal from upstream traders/wholesalers. The distribution of sourcing quantities was similar between small and large retailers. Notably, a share of large producers (12%) sourced directly, possibly allowing them to integrate vertically and negotiate better prices.

3.3. Business Model

3.3.1. Value Proposition

The key component of the business model contains a value proposition comprising the charcoal product, customer groups, and customer relations. The most valued product quality dimensions reported for the respondents’ customers are listed in Table 7.
Price and product quality were the most critical aspects of customer satisfaction reported by all types of charcoal traders. Both charcoal quality and quality tree species were highly rated. Price and the quality of packaging received slightly lower scores among the traders; however, these aspects were still seen as essential prerequisites for customer satisfaction.
The service aspects (availability, courtesy, credibility, and home delivery) were given slightly lower ratings than the product quality attributes, even though they are important components in the overall product–service value proposition (Table 7). Service indicators were more highly rated among wholesale traders than small-scale traders, which reflects a more professional view of customer satisfaction in this group.
The key customer groups for the different size groups are indicated in Table 8.
Small-scale traders mostly sold their charcoal to households. Large-scale traders sold relatively smaller, although still considerable, shares to households and more to large commercial customers. The specifically mentioned customer groups were tea sellers, tailors, and laundry operators (blachisseurs). Wholesale traders focused on retailers. However, several traders did not highlight a specific dominant target customer group.

3.3.2. Value Creation and Delivery

Value creation and delivery involve the key activities associated with buying and selling charcoal: skills, resources used, channels, and business partners (Figure 1). The majority of the traders’ time (their activities) was used for selling activities, followed by purchasing, information processing (particularly among large-scale traders), and loading/unloading. The most traded tree species for the traders’ customers in the order of mention are listed in Table 9. The raw material consisted of wood species, whereas alternative charcoal sources, e.g., agricultural waste, were not mentioned.
Furthermore, the additional physical resources reported included vehicles such as pickups and motorbikes. The findings revealed that 20% of the respondents owned a vehicle and 20% owned a motorbike; moreover, it was also common to rent a car or motorbike for charcoal transport. Other transport means included bicycles and carts pulled by donkeys or oxen.
The capabilities and competencies used in the charcoal business are listed in Table 10.
The top three capabilities included physical strength to carry bags, good customer relations, market knowledge, and schooling knowledge. Wholesalers differed slightly from the larger sample and prioritized market and price knowledge, negotiation skills, and good customer relations. Partners in the charcoal business are listed in Table 11.
Family plays a central role in charcoal-trading activities, and half the respondents across the different groups conducted trade together with family members (Table 11). Traders also created partnerships with friends. However, the role of traders’ associations appeared insignificant, according to interview data. A few large-scale enterprises reported a high number of employees.

3.3.3. Value Capture

Value capture concerns earning revenues from the charcoal value proposition, associated value creation, and delivery. Economic estimates are listed in Table 12.
The value capture values were converted from CFA francs to USD according to the exchange rate in November 2019.
Both the average purchasing and selling prices were lower among wholesalers compared with the categories focusing on retail. This difference may depend on the economies of scale and a fixed cost component in purchasing (e.g., fixed ordering costs). The circumstance can also explain why wholesale traders purchase more upstream in the supply chain, even from the producer, with lower unit prices. Wholesale traders may also have the market power to negotiate quantity discounts, indicating that wholesale traders obtained profits through a high asset turnover and by extracting a good unit margin. Small-scale traders could benefit from a larger gross margin per bag by charging high consumer prices. Large traders that served end-use customers obtained the lowest gross margins per bag. Small-scale retailers also reported the longest period between purchasing and selling charcoal. This cash-to-cash measure negatively affected returns on assets [36].
Income from the charcoal trade was primarily used for food. Other cost items involved housing, school fees, medical costs, and helping extended families (Table 13).
The findings indicate that trade may contribute to reducing poverty among poorer traders (43% were calculated to be below the assessed poverty line). Moreover, this rate coincides with the overall poverty rate for Niger of 45.4% [29].
Alternative activities that could be performed in case charcoal income were to end are listed in Table 14.
Table 14 indicates that traders would utilize diverse strategies if the charcoal trade disappeared, e.g., if the charcoal trade became banned for conservation reasons. Continued trade of other types of products was most frequently mentioned, alongside farming and transport. A higher percentage of wholesalers confirmed that emigration was a likely strategy. Wholesalers may have more possibilities than small-scale retailers to access the necessary financial means to emigrate.

3.3.4. Strategy

The traders’ expectations for the future were mixed (Table 15). Nearly half of the respondents expected a reduced supply of charcoal; however, an increase in charcoal supply was also expected, particularly among wholesalers.
According to most categories, prices were expected to continue to increase, although the view within the wholesaler group was mixed. However, diverse views were expressed on the future general development of the charcoal sector. Large-scale traders and wholesalers showed a more optimistic view of the development of the sector than small-scale retailers.

3.3.5. Female Traders

The share of women among the respondents was less than 15%. Compared with men, women were mainly small-scale traders, and their gross margins were on average 20% of what men earned. Women had a more pessimistic view of the market, and they expected that the supply of charcoal would not increase. Moreover, they mostly thought the trade prospects were bleak.
The general view on women’s capacity to engage in the charcoal trade also differed between genders (Table 16).
Men considered this capacity to be lower and cited reasons why women could not participate in the charcoal trade, which included security reasons, traditional norms, women’s lack of endurance or marketing skills, and the view that commerce was men’s work. Women, on the other hand, claimed that they were fully capable of participating in the charcoal trading business. One main obstacle for women to enter the charcoal business, mentioned by both genders, was household chores.

4. Discussion

4.1. Main Results

The survey used in this study obtained new insights into the stated research questions. The charcoal trade in Niger is conducted by a range of actors, from large- to small-scale levels. The business sector includes a few large-scale actors and a high number of small-scale retailers. More than 70% of the charcoal comes from sources outside Niger, and nearly half the quantity is produced in Nigeria; however, charcoal also enters Niger from Burkina Faso and Benin (RQ1). Many traders combine charcoal in a portfolio of traded products, and business models differ between the different categories of traders. A common key ambition is to offer charcoal of high quality from preferred tree species. Large traders obtain revenues from the sale of large quantities and by sourcing at low prices, sometimes directly from producers. Small-scale traders/retailers benefit economically from higher consumer prices. Large retailers reach more modest unit margins. Respondents expect a reduced supply of charcoal, increasing prices, and, for their own business, stable or, for wholesalers, improved opportunities (RQ2). The activity contributes to sustainable development by generating additional income for the actors, which in some cases reduces their poverty level. However, the increasing import of charcoal from countries with weak forest governance and forest decline suggests that the value chains in their current unregulated form are not sustainable in the long term (RQ3).
This study confirms previous surveys documenting thriving charcoal use in West Africa [7]. Additionally, our findings reveal a cross-border trade and expectations of increased charcoal quantities in the future. This study confirms earlier reports [8,10] that charcoal quantities are transported from forested areas, such as Nigeria, overland to less forested regions in Africa, such as the Sahel. Furthermore, this study’s results conform with study findings from the Democratic Republic of Congo and other parts of Africa, which describe how charcoal is usually transported to urban centers [4].
The large imports of charcoal and comparatively modest domestic production in Niger are noticeable but not unexpected. However, the findings from the five studied cities in Niger do not conform to the 2019 data provided in the FAO databases [3], which reported an annual production within the country of 771,843 metric tons and insignificant import quantities. The current study indicates a larger dependency on imported charcoal in Niger.
The high diversity in size classes of charcoal traders explains how the distribution and retailing of charcoal are organized in Niger and other low-income countries with similar characteristics. Low-income countries commonly show a fine network of small-scale retailers, partially because customers need local selling points and do not have the means to travel far to buy charcoal. In contrast, sourcing, transportation, and complicated cross-border trade bring advantages and economies of scale for a few large-scale resourceful actors. Large trade operators also appear to have a more professional approach to the charcoal trade than small-scale traders.
The presence of wholesale, large-scale, and small-scale traders agrees with the findings of Shively et al. [17] in Uganda and Baumert et al. [5] in Mozambique, which also indicated different size classes within the charcoal supply chains. This also reflects that charcoal revenues are proportional to the scale of operation; however, a strict categorization of charcoal traders may be too simplistic; large-scale traders may also sell to final customers and, conversely, individual small- or medium-scale retail traders can also source charcoal directly from producers.
The low participation of women in the charcoal trade, including small-scale retail, does not conform with some studies that document a high share of women in charcoal retail [14,18], although the situation in Niger may be explained by gendered conventions whereby trade is seen as a men’s occupation. However, the responses from female respondents demonstrate their preparedness to participate in the charcoal business.
Our findings confirm the previous results from Smith et al. [16], which state that the charcoal sector plays a key role in livelihood diversification. The unequal distribution of revenues from the charcoal trade observed in the present study concurs with Shively et al. [17] and Baumert et al. [5].

4.2. Implications

This study further elucidates the trade flows and business aspects of charcoal in southern Niger including the supply situation, business practices, and prospects. A fair understanding of the charcoal trade in these cities may improve the possibilities for policy intervention.
The findings indicate improvement opportunities for better efficiency, customer satisfaction, and sustainability, highlighting the importance of charcoal quality for customer satisfaction. Furthermore, they suggest that an increased regeneration and use of high-quality wood types in tandem with more efficient charcoal production techniques could improve the profitability of the traders. The actors’ margins can also benefit from improved marketing and management skills. Improved profits can, in turn, increase traders’ opportunities to meet SDGs 1, 2, and 4. In addition, improved charcoal quality reduces indoor pollution for end-users, which would bring progress concerning SDG 7.
The increasing charcoal use and other trends in Niger and the region indicate a worsening situation for the forest condition related to deforestation and forest degradation [19,22]. Measures that manage to reconcile forest conservation with meeting basic household energy needs are warranted. A transition toward sustainable forest management in Niger and neighboring countries and alternative biomass sources (e.g., through briquetting) could reduce pressure on the region’s forest resources and consequently improve the prospects of reaching SDGs 13 and 15 [37]. This would probably also promote the conservation of the nation’s scarce forest area. However, due to security problems and the need for regional collaboration, this task appears to be complicated in Niger.
Consequently, concerns could be raised about the future sustainability of the charcoal sector. Previous studies, e.g., [1,20], argue that charcoal production is one driver of the forest cover decline in Africa. The increasing charcoal consumption in Niger and expected continued demand in the future may aggravate an unsustainable situation for the forest conditions in the region and the charcoal sector. Therefore, overland charcoal trade flows should be monitored more intensely, specifically along the Sahel region.

4.3. Limitations and Further Research

This study’s findings must be interpreted with caution. Protocols with well-determined sampling probabilities could not be guaranteed since the charcoal trade operates within the informal economy and a sampling frame could not be established. Moreover, interviews in certain cities and towns in Niger and the countryside could not be conducted for security reasons. The lack of standardized and precise records in official statistics and enterprise economic reporting also impacts this study’s reliability. The limited rights for women to engage in business activities, or to speak to strangers, may have affected this study’s outcomes. However, the fact that this study was carried out over several cities in the most populated area of the country could have improved this study’s validity.
Despite the limitations encountered during the survey, this study provides insights into charcoal trade flows and highlights the need for further and in-depth studies about the overland charcoal trade in Africa. Trade streams should be investigated further to capture the actual quantities and actors involved, including production, transport, and trade. The expected increase in charcoal trade calls for regional assessments of its impact on the forests. Studies can also probe more into women’s roles in the charcoal trade in the region. Finally, future research can uncover the real drivers for sustainable charcoal supply chains in Niger.

5. Conclusions

Most of the traded charcoal in the cities in southwestern Niger is imported, to a large extent from Nigeria. Key actors are wholesalers and large-scale and small-scale retailers. This is concluded from the reported origin of the traded charcoal. The business models consider value proposition, value creation, and economic value capture, which differ among enterprise types. Consequently, large-scale traders follow a more focused and professional business strategy than small-scale retailers. Moreover, most actors combine the charcoal trade with the sale of other products, and charcoal surplus is used for basic needs and school fees. This survey study elucidated the supply situation in southern Niger and the origins of the imports from neighboring countries. Business practices can be improved in terms of product quality and the creation of equal opportunities for men and women. There are also compelling reasons to conduct in-depth analyses as to whether the current supply is based on sustainable forest use. A key objective would consist of combining a sound charcoal trade with sustainable sourcing and practices. There are strong motives for implementing regional collaborations to promote a sustainable charcoal sector.
This study is one of the first to examine the charcoal trade in a Sahelian country and to describe business models and strategies. Overland charcoal trade is probably more important than is reflected in the current literature, and it should be regarded as a pan-African challenge; therefore, regional policies may be motivated to avoid leakages, overexploitation, and uncoordinated national policies. The charcoal market and product streams should be monitored more closely and managed appropriately, without adversely affecting low-income households, until charcoal can be supplanted by clean, affordable, adaptable, and sustainable energy sources in Niger.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L., D.M. and A.R.; methodology, M.L., D.M. and A.R.; validation, A.R.; formal analysis, M.L., D.M., C.W. and A.R.; investigation, M.L., D.M. and A.R.; resources, M.L., D.M. and A.R.; data curation, M.L., D.M. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L., D.M., C.W. and A.R.; writing—review and editing, M.L., D.M., C.W. and A.R.; visualization, A.R.; supervision, M.L., D.M. and A.R.; project administration, M.L., D.M. and A.R.; funding acquisition, M.L., D.M. and A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development, Formas (Grant No. 2017-00210).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the charcoal value chain actors in Dosso, Gaya, Birini-N’Konni, Maradi, and Niamey in Niger for their participation and considerable contribution to this study. We are also thankful for the help and assistance from Mamane Seini. The dedicated work of the four enumerators is also acknowledged. We are grateful for the valuable suggestions and feedback from three anonymous reviewers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

  • Questionnaire
  • Identification
  • Questions about the interviewee:
  • Age:
  • Gender:
  • Education:
  • Number of children:
3.
The business
  • Is the charcoal business a full or part-time occupation?  Full-time, Part-time
  • If "part-time", what are the other sources of income?  agriculture  Shopkeeper or catering  Transport/Taxi  Employment  Other
4.
Sourcing
  • Where do you source your charcoal from?
  • Which country does the charcoal come from?
  • Is the supply of charcoal  decreasing  stable  increasing
  • Is the price of charcoal  decreasing  stable  increasing
5.
Type of business
  • Do you conduct your trade with …..
  • Family members?  Yes  No
  • Friends?  Yes  No
  • Association?  Yes  No
  • Do you employ people?  Yes  No
  • If yes: The number of people employed
6.
Key Activities
  • What activities do you do in your coal business?
  • Activity: Not at all Partially Frequently
  • Collection of supply and demand information
  • Purchase with supplier
  • Loading
  • Transportation
  • Sale
  • Others
  • If “Other”, please indicate the activity
  • What is the lead time between buying a bag of charcoal and selling the same charcoal?
7.
Resources
  • What means and equipment do you use in your business, do you own them or do you rent them?
  • Staff Purchase price (if “staff”) I rent Rental per month (if “rent”)
  • Car, truck, pickup
  • Motorcycle
  • Others
  • Please specify “other”
8.
Competences and Capabilities
  • State how important these factors/skills are for you to be able to practice your trade successfully.
  • Capacity… Not important Slightly important Some importance Important Very important
  • Physical strength
  • Negotiation techniques
  • Machine driving skills
  • Knowledge of costs and prices
  • Academic knowledge (reading, writing, and arithmetic)
  • Good relationship with customers
  • Good collaboration with other traders
  • Others
  • If “Other”, please indicate the capacity
9.
Marketing
  • How important are the following properties of charcoal to your customers?
  • Unimportant Slightly important Some importance Important Very important
  • Tree species
  • list the two best species
  • Charcoal quality: lump size, color, etc.
  • Packaging
  • Price
  • Others
  • If “other”, please describe the property.
  •  
  • How important are the following aspects of service to you for your customers?
  • Unimportant Slightly important Some importance Important Very important
  • That you have coal “in stock at all times”
  • Possibility of credit
  • Politeness
  • Home supply
  • Other services
  • If “other services”, please explain.
10.
Customers
  • Please indicate the share sold to different types of customers
  • Customers: Less than ¼, ¼ to half, half to ¾, More than ¾
  • Retailers or wholesalers
  • Households
  • Small businesses, e.g., small restaurants
  • Official clients or Institutions (e.g., schools, etc.)
  • Large customers, e.g., hotels, large restaurants
  • Others
  • If “Other”, please explain
11.
Revenues and costs
  • Revenues and costs for charcoal:
  • Dry season How much charcoal (in bags) do you sell per month?
  • What is your purchase price for the bag?
  • What is your selling price for the bag (or sachet)? (please explain if it is per bag or sachet.)
  • Rainy season How much charcoal (in bags) do you sell per month?
  • What is your purchase price for the bag?
  • What is your selling price for the bag (or sachet)? (please explain if it is per bag or sachet.)
  • Estimated costs per bag:
  • Transportation
  • Materials (except coal, empty bags for example)
  • Wages
  • Storage location (Rent)
  • License/permit/tax fees
  • Other costs
  •  
  • What is your total income from activities other than charcoal?
  • What is your net income per month from the charcoal business? (calculated by the interviewer.)
12.
Livelihoods
  • How do you use your charcoal income?
  • Use of income: Less than ¼, ¼ to half, half to ¾, More than ¾
  • Food
  • Tuition fees
  • Housing
  • Others
  • Do women have the same opportunities as men in the coal sector? Yes No
  • If ‘no’, please give a reason
  • Yes No
  • Women are limited by security issues
  • Traditions limit women’s opportunities
  • Women do not decide how the money is used
  • Charcoal trade affects household work
  • If you hadn’t been in the charcoal business, what would you have been doing instead?
  • Agriculture
  • Transport of products other than charcoal
  • Trade, sale of products other than charcoal
  • Casual work
  • Exodus
  • Nothing, I would earn less
  • Others
  • If “Other”, please specify ……
  • How is your charcoal business growing (from your perspective)?
  • Do you have any comments or questions?

References

  1. Van Dam, J. The Charcoal Transition: Greening the Charcoal Value Chain to Mitigate Climate Change and Improve Local Livelihoods; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. FAO. Sustainable Charcoal Production for Food Security and Forest Landscape Restoration; FO:AFWC/2020/4.2; African Forestry and Wildlife Commission: Nairobi, Kenya, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. FAOSTAT. Forestry Production and Trade. 2021. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO (accessed on 9 August 2023).
  4. Schure, J.; Levang, P.; Wiersum, K.F. Producing Woodfuel for Urban Centers in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Path Out of Poverty for Rural Households? World Dev. 2014, 64, S80–S90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baumert, S.; Luz, A.C.; Fisher, J.; Vollmer, F.; Ryan, C.M.; Patenaude, G.; Zorrilla-Miras, P.; Artur, L.; Nhantumbo, I.; Macqueen, D. Charcoal supply chains from Mabalane to Maputo: Who benefits? Energy Sustain. Dev. 2016, 33, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. IEA. Africa Energy Outlook 2019; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ouedraogo, B. Household energy preferences for cooking in urban Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 3787–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Agyei, F.K.; Hansen, C.P.; Acheampong, E. Profit and profit distribution along Ghana’s charcoal commodity chain. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2018, 47, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brobbey, L.K.; Hansen, C.P.; Kyereh, B.; Pouliot, M. The economic importance of charcoal to rural livelihoods: Evidence from a key charcoal-producing area in Ghana. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 101, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nyarko, I.; Nwaogu, C.; Miroslav, H.; Peseu, P.O. Socio-Economic Analysis of Wood Charcoal Production as a Significant Output of Forest Bioeconomy in Africa. Forests 2021, 12, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schure, J.; Ingram, V.; Sakho-Jimbira, M.S.; Levang, P.; Wiersum, K.F. Formalisation of charcoal value chains and livelihood outcomes in Central-and West Africa. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2013, 17, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khundi, F.; Jagger, P.; Shively, G.; Sserunkuuma, G. Income, poverty and charcoal production in Uganda. For. Policy Econ. 2011, 13, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mutta, D.; Mahamane, L.; Wekesa, C.; Kowero, G.; Roos, A. Sustainable Business Models for Informal Charcoal Producers in Kenya. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roos, A.; Mutta, D.; Larwanou, M.; Wekesa, C.; Kowero, G. Operations and improvement needs in the informal charcoal sector: A participatory value stream analysis. Int. For. Rev. 2021, 23, 351–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Smith, H.E.; Eigenbrod, F.; Kafumbata, D.; Hudson, M.D.; Schreckenberg, K. Criminals by necessity: The risky life of charcoal transporters in Malawi. For. Trees Livelihoods 2015, 24, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Smith, H.E.; Hudson, M.D.; Schreckenberg, K. Livelihood diversification: The role of charcoal production in southern Malawi. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2017, 36, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shively, G.; Jagger, P.; Sserunkuuma, D.; Arinaitwe, A.; Chibwana, C. Profits and margins along Uganda’s charcoal value chain. Int. For. Rev. 2010, 12, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ihalainen, M.; Schure, J.; Sola, P. Where are the women? A review and conceptual framework for addressing gender equity in charcoal value chains in Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2020, 55, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chidumayo, E.N.; Gumbo, D.J. The environmental impacts of charcoal production in tropical ecosystems of the world: A synthesis. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2013, 17, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sedano, F.; Silva, J.A.; Machoco, R.; Meque, C.H.; Sitoe, A.; Ribeiro, N.; Anderson, K.; Ombe, Z.A.; Baule, S.H.; Tucker, C.J. The impact of charcoal production on forest degradation: A case study in Tete, Mozambique. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 094020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zorrilla-Miras, P.; Mahamane, M.; Metzger, M.J.; Baumert, S.; Vollmer, F.; Luz, A.C.; Woollen, E.; Sitoe, A.A.; Patenaude, G.; Nhantumbo, I.; et al. Environmental Conservation and Social Benefits of Charcoal Production in Mozambique. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 144, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main Report; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ludeke-Freund, F.; Carroux, S.; Joyce, A.; Massa, L.; Breuer, H. The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy-45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2018, 15, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Osterwalder, A.; Pigneur, Y.; Tucci, C. Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2005, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Teece, D.J. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 172–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. DFID. Framework of Sustainable Livelihoods; Department for International Development: London, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bryman, A.; Bell, E. Business Research Methods; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  28. IEA. Country Profile—Niger. 2023. Available online: https://www.iea.org/countries/niger (accessed on 16 August 2023).
  29. World Bank. Statistics. World Bank. Available online: https://databank.worldbank.org (accessed on 16 August 2023).
  30. Mijitaba, M.M.; Jing, F.J. Fuelwood consumption in Niger: A review. Int. J. Res. Stud. Manag. 2013, 2, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Swedish Research Council Good Research Practice; Swedish: Stockholm, Sweden, 2017.
  32. Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  33. Branch, A.; Agyei, F.K.; Anai, J.G.; Apecu, S.L.; Bartlett, A.; Brownell, E.; Caravani, M.; Cavanagh, C.J.; Fennell, S.; Langole, S.; et al. From crisis to context: Reviewing the future of sustainable charcoal in Africa. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022, 87, 102457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chopra, S. Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation, 7th ed.; Global Pearson: Harlow, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  36. Berk, J.; DeMarzo, P. Corporate Finance, 5th ed.; Pearson: Harlow, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanchez, P.D.C.; Aspe, M.M.T.; Sindol, K.N. An Overview on the Production of Bio-briquettes from Agricultural Wastes: Methods, Processes, and Quality. J. Agric. Food Eng. 2022, 1, 2716–6236. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Sustainable business model and linkages to this study’s objectives.
Figure 1. Sustainable business model and linkages to this study’s objectives.
Forests 14 01910 g001
Figure 2. Overview of this study.
Figure 2. Overview of this study.
Forests 14 01910 g002
Figure 3. Locations in this study.
Figure 3. Locations in this study.
Forests 14 01910 g003
Figure 4. Topics in the questionnaire.
Figure 4. Topics in the questionnaire.
Forests 14 01910 g004
Figure 5. Charcoal trade flows in percent (left side: country of origin; right side: retail quantities in the respective town/city).
Figure 5. Charcoal trade flows in percent (left side: country of origin; right side: retail quantities in the respective town/city).
Forests 14 01910 g005
Table 1. Cities and towns where this study was conducted.
Table 1. Cities and towns where this study was conducted.
SitePopulation *Sample Size
Dosso58,67163
Gaya45,46559
Birni-N’Konni63,16969
Maradi267,24988
Niamey978,02968
Total 347
*: Census data 2012.
Table 2. Description of the sample.
Table 2. Description of the sample.
VariablePercentage
Female11.3%
Small < 20 bags */month52.5%
Large ≥ 20 bags/month43.1%
Wholesale4.4%
Mean age40.8
Less than 30 years27.0%
30–49 years46.6%
50 years and above26.4%
Town:
Dosso4.2%
Gaya3.2%
Konni4.5%
Maradi18.9%
Niamey69.2%
The charcoal trade is a partial occupation80.0%
* One bag weighs about 40 kg.
Table 3. Trade flows listed as percent of quantities.
Table 3. Trade flows listed as percent of quantities.
Country of Origin and Quantity Percentage per Destination
DossoGayaKonniMaradiNiamey
Country of originNigeria69.5%5.2%100.0%85.4%28.3%
Burkina Faso1.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%36.1%
Benin22.7%40.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Niger6.7%54.3%0.0%14.6%35.5%
100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
Country of Origin and Destination Quantity Percentage of the Total Quantity
DossoGayaKonniMaradiNiameyWhole Sample
Country of originNigeria1.8%0.1%6.1%19.1%18.9%45.9%
Burkina Faso0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%24.1%24.1%
Benin0.6%0.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%1.5%
Niger0.2%1.3%0.0%3.3%23.7%28.4%
Total2.5%2.3%6.1%22.4%66.7%100.0%
Wholesaler quantities were eliminated to avoid double counting.
Table 4. Description of the forest, demographic, and economic situations in sourcing countries.
Table 4. Description of the forest, demographic, and economic situations in sourcing countries.
Country
NigerNigeriaBurkina FasoBenin
Area, thousand km21267924274115
Population 2020, million24.2206.120.912.1
Population increase in 2020 3.8%2.5%2.8%2.7%
Relative forest area0.9%24.1%23.1%28.7%
Net annual forest area change 2010–2020−1.1%−0.2%−0.8%−1.5%
Poverty rate (year)45.4% (2014)39.1% (2018)43.8% (2014)49.6% (2015)
Sources: [22,29].
Table 5. Charcoal quantities per trader category, bags.
Table 5. Charcoal quantities per trader category, bags.
SmallLargeWholesaleWhole Sample
Percent of number traders 52.5% 43.1% 4.4% 100%
Average sold quantity per month, bags 9.5 a 71.8 b 511.6 c58.6
Percent of total studied quantity8.5%52.8%38.8%100%
Superscript letters denote that column values/proportions with the same letter do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
Table 6. Sourcing type as a share of the total quantity as a percentage within the category.
Table 6. Sourcing type as a share of the total quantity as a percentage within the category.
Category
Sourcing TypeSmallLargeWholesaleWhole Sample
SourcingFrom trader95.7% a93.9% a88.4% b94.6%
From producer2.1% a3.3% a11.6% b3.0%
Own production2.1% a2.4% a 2.1%
Other0.1% a0.5% a 0.3%
Total100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
Superscript letters denote that column values/proportions with the same letter do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
Table 7. The importance of quality dimensions among traders’ customers expressed as a percentage of respondents assigning “high importance” as a percentage within the category.
Table 7. The importance of quality dimensions among traders’ customers expressed as a percentage of respondents assigning “high importance” as a percentage within the category.
Category
Quality DimensionSmallLargeWholesaleWhole Sample
Product quality:
Quality tree species95.0%100%100%97.3%
Quality of the charcoal95.9%96.1%98.3%96.1%
Price91.8%98.2%100%94.9%
Packaging60.4%73.9%66.8%66.4%
Service quality:
Availability78.5%86.5%96.1%82.7%
Courtesy50.3%61.3%64.7%55.4%
Credibility31.4%34.4%56.9%33.8%
Home deliveries9.4%32.7%42.1%20.5%
Table 8. Customer segments expressed as the percentage of the category selling mainly to the customer segment.
Table 8. Customer segments expressed as the percentage of the category selling mainly to the customer segment.
Category
Customer SegmentSmallLargeWholesaleWhole Sample
Households42.9%10.6%1.3%27.1%
Retailers and wholesalers1.2%0.0%98.7%5.0%
Institutions (schools, public purchasers) 3.3%1.3%1.3%2.3%
Large commercial customers (large hotels, restaurants)3.0%31.2%0.0%15.0%
Share in group selling >50% to the customer group; most important customer segment in bold.
Table 9. Most important tree species listed according to the number of mentions.
Table 9. Most important tree species listed according to the number of mentions.
Tree SpeciesNumber of Mentions
Piliostigma reticulatum25
Balanites aegyptiaca23
Prosopis africana20
Guiera senegalensis20
Faidherbia albida17
Combretum nigricans13
Ziziphus mauritiana12
Combretum micranthum9
Azadirachta indica7
Acacia senegal5
Acacia nilotica3
Vitellaria paradoxa3
Anogeissus leiocarpa3
Piliostigma reticulatum3
Bauhinia rufescens2
Vitex doniana2
Combretum glutinosum1
Detarium microcarpum1
Table 10. Capabilities and competencies listed as average importance on a scale of 1 to 5.
Table 10. Capabilities and competencies listed as average importance on a scale of 1 to 5.
Category
Capability and CompetenceSmallLargeWholesaleWhole Sample
Physical strength 4.34 a 4.12 b 3.69 c 4.21
Good customer relations 4.18 a 4.14 b 4.51 c 4.18
Market and price knowledge 3.99 a 3.87 b 4.81 c 3.98
Schooling (reading, writing, and calculations) 4.03 a 3.75 b 4.11 a 3.91
Good collaboration with other traders 3.72 a 3.91 b 4.50 c 3.84
Negotiation skills 3.51 a 3.46 a 4.75 b 3.55
Driving skills 3.07 a,b 2.97 a 3.36 b 3.04
EducationNone 45.0% a 65.1% b 37.9% a 51.3%
Primary 30.6% a 24.0% b 40.7% c 29.1%
Secondary 24.4% a 10.9% b 21.4% a 19.6%
Superscript letters denote that column values/proportions with the same letter do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
Table 11. Partners in the charcoal business enterprise as a percentage within the category.
Table 11. Partners in the charcoal business enterprise as a percentage within the category.
Category
Partner TypeSmallLargeWholesaleWhole Sample
Family64.5% a45.2% b74.7% c56.6%
Friend24.6% a49.9% b35.7% c36.0%
Association1.9% a2.7% a1.3% a2.2%
Employed60.8% a77.5% b94.2% c69.5%
The average number of employed workers2 a2 a6 b2
Superscript letters denote that column values/proportions with the same letter do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
Table 12. Value capture per bag and month, USD.
Table 12. Value capture per bag and month, USD.
DescriptionCategory
SmallLargeWholesaleWhole Sample
Average cost per bag: dry season 10.18 a 10.00 a 5.46 b 9.88
Average selling price per bag: dry season 12.56 a 11.31 b 8.76 c 12.56
Margin per bag2.38 a1.32 b3.30 b2.68
Margin per trader and month22.69 a94.64 a1688.09 b156.80
Cash-to-cash time (days) 4.96 a 3.50 b 2.86 b4.37
Superscript letters denote that column values/proportions with the same letter do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
Table 13. Use of charcoal revenues on cost type as a percentage within the category.
Table 13. Use of charcoal revenues on cost type as a percentage within the category.
Cost TypeShare of Revenue CategoryWhole Sample
SmallLargeWholesale
FoodLT 1/435.6% a48.6% b 39.6%
1/4–1/215.7% a17.3% a42.9% b17.6%
1/2–3/448.5% a34.1% b57.1% a42.7%
>3/40.2% a 0.1%
School feesLT 1/474.3% a75.7% a42.9% b73.5%
1/4–1/223.3% a24.2% a57.1% b25.2%
1/2–3/42.4% a0.1% b 1.3%
HousingLT 1/461.6% a43.3% b89.6% c55.0%
1/4–1/237.6% a56.4% b10.4% c44.5%
1/2–3/40.8% a0.3% a 0.5%
Superscript letters denote that column values/proportions with the same letter do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
Table 14. Alternative activities that could be performed if the charcoal trade was not possible as a percentage within the category.
Table 14. Alternative activities that could be performed if the charcoal trade was not possible as a percentage within the category.
Category
Reported Alternative ActivitySmallLargeWholesaleWhole Sample
FarmingNot likely42.6% a33.2% b27.9% b37.9%
Maybe35.4% a49.8% b27.3% a41.2%
Very likely22.0% a17.0% b44.8% c20.9%
Transport of other productsNot likely39.2% a27.7% b32.0% a,b33.9%
Maybe31.5% a55.3% b26.1% a41.5%
Very likely29.2% a17.0% b41.8% c24.5%
Sell other products than charcoalNot likely5.6% a7.6% a5.8% a6.5%
Maybe32.5% a50.4% b57.8% b41.3%
Very likely61.9% a42.1% b36.4% b52.2%
Occasional workNot likely48.5% a69.9% b47.7% a57.7%
Maybe32.5% a17.7% b30.1% a26.0%
Very likely19.0% a12.4% b22.2% a16.3%
EmigrationNot likely59.9% a67.7% b37.7% c62.3%
Maybe27.8% a23.2% b30.5% a,b25.9%
Very likely12.3% a9.1% b31.8% c11.8%
Nothing. I would just earn lessNot likely91.8% a89.4% a100.0% b91.1%
Maybe1.6% a3.5% b 2.4%
Very likely6.6% a7.1% a 6.5%
Superscript letters denote that column values/proportions with the same letter do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
Table 15. Expected development expressed as a percentage within the category.
Table 15. Expected development expressed as a percentage within the category.
Expectation AspectGroup
SmallLargeWholesaleWhole Sample
Expected supply of charcoalDecreasing52.4% a44.4% a11.8% b46.7%
Stable26.5% a20.0% a5.9% a22.5%
Increasing21.2% a35.6% b82.4% c30.8%
Expected price of charcoalDecreasing9.6% a3.2% a31.3% b7.7%
Stable24.7% a29.9% a50.0% a28.3%
Increasing65.7% a66.9% a18.8% b64.0%
How will your charcoal trade develop?Improve43.7% a94.2% b87.7% c67.2%
Stable37.9% a1.5% b9.7% c21.1%
Decrease18.3% a4.3% b2.6% b11.6%
Superscript letters denote that column values/proportions with the same letter do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
Table 16. Share among female and male traders that agree with statements about the charcoal business.
Table 16. Share among female and male traders that agree with statements about the charcoal business.
StatementGenderTotal
FemaleMale
Women have the same opportunities as men85.8% a80.7% b81.2%
Women are affected by security problems30.4% a26.2% a26.5%
Traditions are affecting women’s participation33.1% a32.0% a32.1%
Women do not decide on financial issues1.6% a20.0% b18.6%
The charcoal trade affects household activities52.4% a80.6% b78.6%
Superscript letters denote that column values/proportions with the same letter do not differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Larwanou, M.; Mutta, D.; Wekesa, C.; Roos, A. Charcoal Trade in Niger—Product Flows and Business Models. Forests 2023, 14, 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091910

AMA Style

Larwanou M, Mutta D, Wekesa C, Roos A. Charcoal Trade in Niger—Product Flows and Business Models. Forests. 2023; 14(9):1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091910

Chicago/Turabian Style

Larwanou, Mahamane, Doris Mutta, Chemuku Wekesa, and Anders Roos. 2023. "Charcoal Trade in Niger—Product Flows and Business Models" Forests 14, no. 9: 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091910

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop