Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Role of Visitor Behavior in Soundscape Restorative Experiences in Urban Parks
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Water Demand for Riparian Forest Vegetation Based on Sentinel-2 Data: A Case Study of the Kokyar River Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Global Overview of the Application of the Braun-Blanquet Approach in Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Tradeoffs between Stand Volume and Understory Vegetation Diversity in Quercus wutaishanica Forests under Climate Change

1
Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Liupan Mountains Forest Ecosystems National Positioning Observation and Research Station, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2
College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(10), 1750; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15101750
Submission received: 26 March 2024 / Revised: 26 September 2024 / Accepted: 2 October 2024 / Published: 4 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Indicators and Baselines of Afforestation and Reforestation)

Abstract

Natural forests play a crucial role in providing various ecosystem services, including timber production and biodiversity conservation. However, climate change and anthropogenic factors pose a severe threat to competing forest ecosystem services functions. Therefore, to optimize and sustainably utilize competing forest services, tradeoffs are often necessary. This study was conducted in Northwest China to explore tradeoffs aimed at improving the quality of Quercus wutaishanica Mayr natural forests under climate change conditions, focusing on stand volume, timber production, and understory vegetation diversity conservation. Data from 77 field surveys were used to construct a coupled model for stand growth, stand structure, and site conditions. Changes in understory vegetation species number (UVSN) with crown cover were quantified. These models and relationships can be used as tools to estimate tradeoffs. As stand density increased, single-tree volume decreased, whereas timber volume increased. UVSN increased and then decreased with increasing crown cover and was able to maintain a relative maximum at 0.5–0.65. Under the current climatic conditions, the optimum stand densities corresponding to 30, 40, 50, and 60 years were 1390, 1153, 1042, and 871 trees/ha, respectively, to maintain a high UVSN and adequate stand volume. When mean annual temperature rose, stand densities could be reduced to maintain high-quality timber. Although only two major services were considered, the tradeoffs presented in this study can inform future research to improve the quality of natural forests.
Keywords: natural forests; forest multiple service functions; optimize; coupled model; stand density natural forests; forest multiple service functions; optimize; coupled model; stand density

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, B.; Yu, P.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Yu, Y.; Wan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xu, L. Tradeoffs between Stand Volume and Understory Vegetation Diversity in Quercus wutaishanica Forests under Climate Change. Forests 2024, 15, 1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15101750

AMA Style

Liu B, Yu P, Wang X, Zhang X, Yu Y, Wan Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Xu L. Tradeoffs between Stand Volume and Understory Vegetation Diversity in Quercus wutaishanica Forests under Climate Change. Forests. 2024; 15(10):1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15101750

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Bingbing, Pengtao Yu, Xiao Wang, Xue Zhang, Yipeng Yu, Yanfang Wan, Yanhui Wang, Zebin Liu, and Lihong Xu. 2024. "Tradeoffs between Stand Volume and Understory Vegetation Diversity in Quercus wutaishanica Forests under Climate Change" Forests 15, no. 10: 1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15101750

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop