The Impact of the Urban Forest Park Recreation Environment and Perceived Satisfaction on Post-Tour Behavioral Intention—Using Tongzhou Grand Canal Forest Park as an Example
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Research Hypotheses
2.1. SOR Theory
2.2. Service Scene Theory and Forest Park Recreation Environment
2.2.1. Service Scene Theory
2.2.2. Proposal of the Concept of an Urban Forest Park Recreation Environment
2.2.3. The Concept of the Cultural Landscape
2.3. Research Hypothesis
2.3.1. The Impact of the Urban Forest Park Recreation Environment on Recreationists’ Perceived Satisfaction
2.3.2. The Impact of the Urban Forest Park Recreation Environment on Post-Tour Behavioral Intention
2.3.3. The Impact of Perceived Satisfaction on Post-Tour Behavioral Intention
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Site
3.2. Questionnaire Design
3.3. Field Survey and Data Collection
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Statistics of Sample Data
4.2. Reliability and Validity Analysis
4.2.1. Reliability Analysis
4.2.2. Validity Analysis
4.3. Structural Model Analysis
4.4. Structural Modeling and Hypothesis Testing
4.4.1. Goodness-of-Fit Test of Structural Model
4.4.2. Hypothetical Test
4.4.3. Test of the Mediating Effect of Perceived Satisfaction
4.5. Model Result Analysis
5. Conclusions
5.1. Analysis Conclusions
5.2. Design and Management Implications
5.3. Research Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Table of Results
KMO | 0.946 | |
---|---|---|
Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity | Chi-Square | 9180.592 |
df | 351 | |
p | 0.000 |
SPE | SE | RCC | PS | PTBI | |
SPE | 0.805 | ||||
SE | 0.175 | 0.824 | |||
RCC | 0.308 | 0.197 | 0.814 | ||
PS | 0.322 | 0.213 | 0.289 | 0.862 | |
PTBI | 0.52 | 0.428 | 0.447 | 0.453 | 0.843 |
R-Squared | Adj R-Squared | |
Perceived Satisfaction | 0.161 | 0.156 |
Post-Tour Behavioral Intention | 0.493 | 0.49 |
SSO | The Sum of Squared Residuals | Q2 (=1 − SSR/SSO) | |
---|---|---|---|
Spatial physical environment | 6402 | 6402 | |
Service experience | 2328 | 2328 | |
Regional cultural characteristics | 2328 | 2328 | |
Perceived satisfaction | 2328 | 2056.732 | 0.117 |
Post-tour behavioral intention | 2328 | 1528.052 | 0.344 |
Path | Initial Sample | Sample Mean | Standard Deviation | T-Statistic | p Value | 2.5% | 97.5% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPE → PS → PTBI | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.014 | 3.905 | 0.000 | 0.029 | 0.083 |
SE → PS → PTBI | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 2.821 | 0.005 | 0.01 | 0.051 |
RCC → PS → PTBI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.012 | 3.581 | 0.000 | 0.021 | 0.066 |
Path | Initial Sample | Sample Mean | Standard Deviation | T-Statistic | p Value | 2.5% | 97.5% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPE → PTBI | 0.383 | 0.386 | 0.039 | 9.929 | 0.000 | 0.305 | 0.46 |
SE → PTBI | 0.308 | 0.308 | 0.036 | 8.626 | 0.000 | 0.236 | 0.375 |
RCC → PTBI | 0.269 | 0.268 | 0.042 | 6.34 | 0.000 | 0.189 | 0.35 |
References
- Hsiao, C.H.; Tang, K.Y. Who Captures Whom—Pokémon or Tourists? A Perspective of the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 61, 102312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulrich, R.S.; Simons, R.F.; Losito, B.D.; Fiorito, E.; Miles, M.A.; Zelson, M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 1991, 11, 201–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pintilii, R.-D. Forest Recreation and Landscape Protection. Forests 2022, 13, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Zhang, W.; Meng, H.; Zhang, Z. Analyzing visitors’ preferences and evaluation of satisfaction based on different attributes, with forest trails in the Akasawa national recreational forest, central Japan. Forests 2019, 10, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, T.; Ouyang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Wang, X.; Miao, H. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China. J. Nat. Resour. 2004, 19, 480–491. [Google Scholar]
- Han, X.; Sun, T.; Cao, T. Study on landscape quality assessment of urban forest parks: Take Nanjing Zijinshan National forest Park as an example. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 120, 106902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, W.; Meng, H. Psychological Cognitive Factors Affecting Visual Behavior and Satisfaction Preference for Forest Recreation Space. Forests 2022, 13, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.J.; Huang, Q.T.; Lan, S.R. Tourists’ environmental preferences, perceived restoration and perceived health at Fuzhou National Forest Park. Resour. Sci. 2018, 40, 381–391. [Google Scholar]
- Geng, T.; Fu, H.; Zeng, Y.; Hu, M. Study on the Relationship between Site Perception and Health Benefit Evaluation of People in Forest Recreation Tourism—A Case Study of Longquanshan Urban Forest Park in Chengdu. For. Econ. 2021, 3, 21–36. [Google Scholar]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. The basic emotional impact of environments. Percept. Mot. Ski. 1974, 38, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Q.; Qu, G.; Tang, J. Research on the impact of O2O takeaway price promotion strategies on consumers’ purchase intention. Chin. Manag. Sci. 2023, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Xu, H. The effects of tourscape and destination familiarity on tourists’ place attachment. Tour. Trib. 2022, 38, 122–135. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, B.; Wang, L.; Huang, S.S.; Xiong, Q. Impact of perceived environmental restorativeness on tourists’ pro-environmental behavior: Examining the mediation of place attachment and the moderation of ecocentrism. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2023, 56, 398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Ming, R. Construction of Long March National Cultural Park and Its National Identity: Research on Integrative Development of Culture and Tourism in China. China Soft Sci. 2021, S1, 157–163. [Google Scholar]
- He, X.; Cheng, J.; Hu, D.; Su, L. Influence Mechanism of Service Quality on Tourist Environmentally Responsible Behavior. J. Arid. Land Resour. Environ. 2021, 41, 232–240. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, C.; Pei, Z. Study on the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty oftourists in cultural heritage sites. J. Arid. Land Resour. Environ. 2021, 35, 203–208. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Xiao, L.; Yang, J.; Wang, K.; Cheng, S. On the influence of perception of the Grand Canal landscape value on touristswillingness to protect heritage: A case study of Oingming Bridge Historical and Cultural District, Wuxi. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 36, 202–208. [Google Scholar]
- He, O.; Tan, G. A Study on Tourists’ Prior Knowledge, Perceptions and Behaviors in Culture Ecology Protection Area Tourism. Tour. Sci. 2023, 37, 98–119. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, J. The role of natural soundscape in nature-based tourism experience: An extension of the stimulus–organism–response model. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 25, 707–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Graefe, A.R.; Burns, R.C. Examining the antecedents of destination loyalty in a forest setting. Leis. Sci. 2007, 29, 463–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotler, P. Atmospheric as a marketing tool. J. Retail. 1973, 49, 48–64. [Google Scholar]
- Baker, J.; Grewal, D.; Parasuraman, A. The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1994, 22, 328–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turley, L.W.; Milliman, R.E. Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: A review of the experimental evidence. J. Bus. Res. 2000, 49, 193–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenbaum, M.S. Restorative servicescapes: Restoring directed attention in third places. J. Serv. Manag. 2009, 20, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cox, J. The Importance of Streetscapes and Servicescapes in Tourist Shopping Villages: A Case Study of Two Arizona Communities; Arizona State University: Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kwortnik, R.J. Shipscape influence on the leisure cruise experience. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2008, 2, 289–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhu, S.R.; Chen, Z.H.; Wang, X.L. Study on the perceived difference of tourists in urban forest parks: Based on the perspective of urban leisure service supply. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 35, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Xu, H. A structural model of liminal experience in tourism. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Xu, N.; Song, J.D.; Hu, S.C. Research on visitors’ thermal sensation and space choices in an urban forest park. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2017, 37, 3561–3569. [Google Scholar]
- Kaplan, R.; Kaplan, S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Richards, G. Tourism attraction systems: Exploring cultural behavior. Ann. Tour. Res. 2002, 29, 1048–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rudan, E. The development of cultural tourism in small historical towns. Tour. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 10, 577–586. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.H. Determining the factors affecting the memorable nature of travel experiences. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2010, 27, 780–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nassauer, J.I. Culture and changing landscape structure. Landsc. Ecol. 1995, 10, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M. The Concept of Cultural Landscape: Discourse and Narratives. Landsc. Interfaces Cult. Herit. Chang. Landsc. 2003, 3, 21–51. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, N. Strategic Planning and Place Branding in a World Heritage Cultural Landscape: A Case Study of the English Lake District, UK. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2020, 28, 1291–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saunders, P. Social Theory and the Urban Question; Routledge: Oxford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, Y.; Fu, X.X. Impact of the built environment and perceived neighborhood characteristics on residents’ satisfaction: Evidence from the Shanghai suburbs. Prog. Geogr. 2019, 38, 686–697. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, A.P. Forest landscapes as social-ecological systems and implications for management. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 177, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, K. Empirical study on factors affecting tourist satisfaction in scenic spots based on Fuzzy-IPA. J. Tour. 2010, 25, 61–65. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, C.M.; Zhao, B.F. The tourism visitor satisfaction perception and promotion strategy—A case of Harbin, Heilongjiang Province. J. Arid. Land Resour. Environ. 2014, 28, 780–796. [Google Scholar]
- Warshaw, P.R.; Davis, F.D. Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1985, 21, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zabkar, V.; Brencic, M.M.; Dmitrovic, T. Modeling perceived quality, visitor satisfaction and behavioural intentions at the destination level. Tour. Manag. 2010, 31, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, P. Spatial deconstruction of tourism image research using foreign place theory. Mod. Urban Res. 2009, 24, 69–75. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, Q.; Xue, F.; Chen, Q. An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Tourists’ Revisit Intention in Forest Park—Taking Jiulonggu National Forest Park in Putian City, Fujian Province as an Example. For. Econ. 2021, 43, 50–61. [Google Scholar]
- Dang, B.; Kang, Z.; Sun, B. Study on the Influencing Mechanism of Forest Recreation Environment Restoration Assessment. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 36, 135–140. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, W.; Meng, F.; Xu, Y. An Empirical Study on the Impact of Tourists’ Environmental Attitude on Their Environmental Behaviors-A Case Study in Wulingyuan Scenic Spot of Zhangliajie, the World Natural Heritage Site. J. Jishou Univ. 2016, 37, 101–108. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, O.; Yang, D.; Li, W. Driving Factors of Pro-environment Behaviorof Forest Park Tourists: A Case Study of Zhangjiajie National Forest Park. Areal Res. Dev. 2018, 37, 101–106+125. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, X.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Research on the driving factors of tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior—Taking Taiwan as an example. J. Tour. 2015, 30, 49–59. [Google Scholar]
- Morgan, M.; Xu, F. Student travel experiences: Memories and dreams. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2009, 18, 216–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H. The antecedents of memorable tourism experiences: The development of a scale to measure the destination attributes associated with memorable experiences. Tour. Manag. 2014, 44, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coudounaris, D.N.; Sthapit, E. Antecedents of memorable tourism experience related to behavioral intentions. Psychol. Mark. 2017, 34, 1084–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, C.; Qu, H. Examining the structural relationships of destination image, tourists, satisfaction and destination loyalty: An integrated approach. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 624–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, Y.; Uysal, M. An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: A structural model. Tour. Manag. 2005, 26, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagles, P.F.J.; McCool, S.F. Tourism in National Parks and Protected Areas: Planning and Management; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Rivera, M.A.; Croes, R. Ecotourists’ loyalty: Will they tell about the destination or will they return? J. Ecotourism. 2010, 9, 85–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taplin, R.H.; Rodger, K.; Moore, S.A. A method for testing the effect of management interventions on the satisfaction and loyalty of national park visitors. Leis. Sci. 2016, 38, 140–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, S.A.; Rodger, K.; Taplin, R. Moving beyond visitor satisfaction to loyalty in nature-based tourism: A review and research agenda. Curr. Issues Tour. 2015, 18, 667–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, S.A.; Rodger, K.; Taplin, R.H. Developing a better understanding of the complexities of visitor loyalty to Karijini National Park, Western Australia. Tour. Manag. 2017, 62, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Liu, Z.; Wu, T.; Zhang, P. In the Clear Mirror, the Blue Oars Move and the Green Poplar Sits Deep, Smelling the Warbler—Plant Landscape Design in the Southern District of Tongzhou Grand Canal Forest Park, Beijing. In Proceedings of the Academic Forum on Capital Landscape Greening and Biodiversity Protection, Beijing, China, 14 October 2011; pp. 104–111. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, T.H.; Jan, F.H.; Huang, G.W. The influence of recreation experiences on environmentally responsible behavior: The case of Liuqiu Island, Taiwan. J. Sustain. Tour. 2015, 23, 947–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, H.; Zhang, Y. Research on the generation mechanism of tourists’ happiness in virtual tourism product experience-based on the perspective of embodied experience. Tour. Sci. 2022, 36, 17–35. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.; Alamer, A. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Res. Methods Appl. Linguist. 2022, 1, 100027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grewal, R.; Cote, J.A.; Baumgartner, H. Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Mark. Sci. 2004, 23, 519–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Dijkstra, T.K.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Diamantopoulos, A.; Straub, D.W.; Calantone, R.J. Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Ronnkko and Evermann (2013). Organ. Res. Methods 2014, 17, 182–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Hubona, G.; Ray, P.A. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikalef, P.; Pateli, A. Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 70, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Shu, B.Y. Study on the perceived images, positive sentiment and behavioral intention of international tourists: Based on the empirical analysis of five old capital cities. Sci. Decis. 2023, 4, 186–198. [Google Scholar]
Dimensions | Related Definitions |
---|---|
Spatial physical environment | Kaplan’s Environmental Preference Scale (Table 2). |
Regional cultural characteristics | Richards found that the cultural and historical resources of the destination may affect destination selection [31]. |
Rudan found that the unique cultural assets of the destination can also improve its image and enhance its competitive advantage [32]. | |
The Memorable Tourism Experience (MTE) scale developed by KIM and other scholars in 2010 included local culture as one of the seven influencing dimensions [33]. | |
Landscapes are also defined in terms of the social processes that shape them. In this view, landscapes modified by human activities reflect cultural values and practices and can therefore be considered social phenomena [34]. | |
Service experience | The interaction between tourists, other tourists, and the staff who provide services in the park is one of the contents of the recreational experience of tourists in the urban forest park recreation environment. |
Various service facilities ensure the functional needs of tourists for recreation in the urban forest park recreation environment. |
Understanding Behavior | Exploratory Behavior | |
---|---|---|
Direct Message | Coherence | Complexity |
Information obtained after speculation is required | Legibility | Mystery |
Classification | Related Description | |
Spatial attributes | Spatial physical environment | Various landscape elements that constitute landscape space. |
Service experience | Supporting leisure facilities, management and maintenance, and other factors; basic public service facilities are the core elements that affect residents’ perceived satisfaction [38]. | |
Non-spatial attributes | Regional cultural characteristics | Without important landscape resources, the quality of urban forest parks will be greatly compromised [39]; regional cultural characteristics will be a component of landscape resources. |
Service experience | Scholar Yuekun Tian studied the factors affecting the satisfaction of recreationists in scenic spots and pointed out that “scenic spot services, tourist landscapes, and scenic spot management have a greater impact on recreationists’ satisfaction” [40]; Yang and other scholars proposed seven subdivisions of service perception, namely, catering, accommodation, transportation, shopping, travel routes, travel safety, and tour guide explanations [41]. |
Latent Variable | Measure Items No. | Measure Items | Variable Types and Assignments | Mean | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spatial physical environment | A1 | The landscape within the urban forest park can be identified | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 4.09 | 1.034 |
A2 | It’s not easy to get lost in the urban forest park | Ordered variable, 1–5: very easy to get lost–very difficult to get lost | 3.97 | 1.032 | |
A3 | There are obvious landmarks in the urban forest park | Ordered variable, 1–5: very unobvious–very obvious | 3.89 | 1.040 | |
A4 | The landscape in the urban forest park is continuous | Ordered variable, 1–5: very discontinuous–very continuous | 3.93 | 1.077 | |
A5 | The landscape within the urban forest park is repetitive | Ordered variable, 1–5: very high repeatability–very low repeatability | 4.01 | 1.024 | |
A6 | The landscape in the urban forest park has distinct layers | Ordered variable, 1–5: very unclear–very clear | 3.77 | 1.084 | |
A7 | There are rich types of landscapes in the urban forest park | Ordered variable, 1–5: very not rich–very rich | 4.05 | 1.018 | |
A8 | The landscape in the urban forest park has rules and order | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low rules and order–very high rules and order | 4.12 | 1.008 | |
A9 | Urban forest parks invite further exploration | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low exploration–very high exploration | 3.81 | 1.102 | |
A10 | The landscape in the urban forest park is clear at a glance | Ordered variable, 1–5: very high–very low | 4.13 | 1.004 | |
A11 | The landscape in the urban forest park is deep and mysterious | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low mystery–very high mystery | 3.85 | 1.099 | |
Service experience | B1 | The hygienic environment in the dining area is clean | Ordered variable, 1–5: very unclean–very clean | 3.92 | 1.056 |
B2 | The amusement facilities are clean and safe | Ordered variable, 1–5: very untidy–very tidy | 3.65 | 1.096 | |
B3 | Is the service provided by the service staff in place | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.52 | 1.103 | |
B4 | The sanitary environment of the recreation area is clean | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.78 | 1.065 | |
Regional cultural characteristics | C1 | Is the regional cultural background significant | Ordered variable, 1–5: very unobvious–very obvious | 3.99 | 1.055 |
C2 | The richness of cultural attractions | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.75 | 1.067 | |
C3 | cultural heritage integrity | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.61 | 1.107 | |
C4 | The popularity of cultural attractions | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.88 | 1.075 | |
Perceived Satisfaction | D1 | Motivating learning and mastering new knowledge | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.76 | 1.141 |
D2 | Forest Park is very attractive | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.58 | 1.198 | |
D3 | Recreational experience activities are fun | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.48 | 1.192 | |
D4 | Immersive experience value | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.67 | 1.166 | |
Post-Tour Behavioral Intention | E1 | Form beautiful memories in memory | Ordered variable, 1–5: very ow–very high | 4.20 | 1.014 |
E2 | Invite friends to play together in the future | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.99 | 1.079 | |
E3 | I would also like to come and play during the holidays | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 3.88 | 1.090 | |
E4 | Will recommend this place to colleagues and friends | Ordered variable, 1–5: very low–very high | 4.09 | 1.053 |
Latent Variable | Measure Items No. | Load Value | Cronbach’s Alpha | rho_A | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spatial physical environment | A1 | 0.805 | 0.946 | 0.947 | 0.953 | 0.647 |
A2 | 0.804 | |||||
A3 | 0.81 | |||||
A4 | 0.787 | |||||
A5 | 0.806 | |||||
A6 | 0.793 | |||||
A7 | 0.837 | |||||
A8 | 0.819 | |||||
A9 | 0.784 | |||||
A10 | 0.811 | |||||
A11 | 0.795 | |||||
Service experience | B1 | 0.834 | 0.843 | 0.847 | 0.895 | 0.68 |
B2 | 0.819 | |||||
B3 | 0.799 | |||||
B4 | 0.845 | |||||
Regional cultural characteristics | C1 | 0.834 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.887 | 0.662 |
C2 | 0.8 | |||||
C3 | 0.797 | |||||
C4 | 0.823 | |||||
Perceived satisfaction | D1 | 0.874 | 0.885 | 0.885 | 0.921 | 0.744 |
D2 | 0.856 | |||||
D3 | 0.854 | |||||
D4 | 0.866 | |||||
Post-tour behavioral intention | E1 | 0.865 | 0.864 | 0.866 | 0.908 | 0.711 |
E2 | 0.815 | |||||
E3 | 0.834 | |||||
E4 | 0.859 |
NO. | Path | Initial Sample | Sample Mean | Standard Deviation | T-Statistic | p Value | 2.5% | 97.5% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SPE-PS | 0.241 | 0.242 | 0.045 | 5.347 | 0.000 | 0.154 | 0.328 |
2 | SE-PS | 0.133 | 0.133 | 0.043 | 3.069 | 0.002 | 0.05 | 0.219 |
3 | RCC-PS | 0.189 | 0.191 | 0.042 | 4.454 | 0.000 | 0.109 | 0.269 |
4 | SPE-PTBI | 0.33 | 0.332 | 0.037 | 8.946 | 0.000 | 0.258 | 0.404 |
5 | SE-PTBI | 0.279 | 0.279 | 0.035 | 7.915 | 0.000 | 0.208 | 0.345 |
6 | RCC-PTBI | 0.227 | 0.226 | 0.043 | 5.234 | 0.000 | 0.14 | 0.308 |
7 | PS-PTBI | 0.222 | 0.221 | 0.034 | 6.45 | 0.000 | 0.152 | 0.287 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yao, X.; Sun, Y.; Sun, B.; Huang, Y. The Impact of the Urban Forest Park Recreation Environment and Perceived Satisfaction on Post-Tour Behavioral Intention—Using Tongzhou Grand Canal Forest Park as an Example. Forests 2024, 15, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020330
Yao X, Sun Y, Sun B, Huang Y. The Impact of the Urban Forest Park Recreation Environment and Perceived Satisfaction on Post-Tour Behavioral Intention—Using Tongzhou Grand Canal Forest Park as an Example. Forests. 2024; 15(2):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020330
Chicago/Turabian StyleYao, Xuhui, Yan Sun, Bowen Sun, and Yan Huang. 2024. "The Impact of the Urban Forest Park Recreation Environment and Perceived Satisfaction on Post-Tour Behavioral Intention—Using Tongzhou Grand Canal Forest Park as an Example" Forests 15, no. 2: 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020330
APA StyleYao, X., Sun, Y., Sun, B., & Huang, Y. (2024). The Impact of the Urban Forest Park Recreation Environment and Perceived Satisfaction on Post-Tour Behavioral Intention—Using Tongzhou Grand Canal Forest Park as an Example. Forests, 15(2), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020330