Next Article in Journal
Urban Vegetation Classification for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing Combining Feature Engineering and Improved DeepLabV3+
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Profiling of the Genes Related to Leaf Discoloration in Zelkova schneideriana
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy and Antifungal Mechanism of Rosemary Essential Oil against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Type A Response Regulator Is Involved in Growth in Salix Matsudana Koidz
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CsAFS2 Gene from the Tea Plant Intercropped with Chinese Chestnut Plays an Important Role in Insect Resistance and Cold Resistance

School of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture Sciences, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(2), 380; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020380
Submission received: 15 January 2024 / Revised: 8 February 2024 / Accepted: 16 February 2024 / Published: 18 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Progress in Research on Forest Tree Genomics)

Abstract

:
α-Farnesene, a crucial secondary metabolite in sesquiterpenes, is crucial for plant biotic and abiotic stress resistance. In this study, we screened an AFS gene from transcriptome data of tea plants (Camellia sinensis) intercropped with Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima), resulting in the cloning of CsAFS2. CsAFS2 expression increased following treatment with MJ (Methyl jasmonate), SA (Salicylic acid), GA3 (Gibberellin A3), and various plant growth regulators, as well as under high-salt, drought, and low-temperature conditions. The heterologous genetic transformation of tobacco with CsAFS2 led to an enhanced resistance to low-temperature stress and aphid feeding, evident from elevated levels of osmotic regulatory substances, increased protective enzyme activity, and the upregulation of cold and insect resistance-related genes. Trichomes, crucial in cold and insect resistance, exhibited significantly greater length and density in transgenic tobacco as compared to control plants. These results confirm the vital role of CsAFS2 in enhancing cold and insect resistance, providing comprehensive insights into stress regulation mechanisms in tea plants and advancing stress-resistant tea plant breeding.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

α-Farnesene is prevalent in leaves, flowers, and fruits of various plants, serving as a crucial aroma component and signal substance. It plays significant roles in insect induction, plant defense, and growth regulation. In apple, pear, and tea plants, α-farnesene production substantially increased when insects invaded [1,2,3]. In soybeans, it was vital for both belowground and aboveground organ defense against nematodes [4]. Additionally, α-farnesene accumulation rose notably in tea plants infested by various pests (tea tapeworm, tetranychus kanzawai, tea looper, or tea green leafhopper) [5,6]. Low-temperature apple treatments also significantly boosted α-farnesene expression [7]. In Arabidopsis, overexpressing the AFS gene enhanced cold stress tolerance through JA biosynthesis and signaling pathways [8]. Thus, high α-farnesene content generally indicated strong resistance.
Intercropping, planting multiple crops in the same field rows, is a common agricultural method to enhance production by efficiently utilizing space, improving ventilation and light transmission, and boosting light energy utilization and stress resistance of crops [9]. In Chinese tea production, a notable cultivation technique involves planting trees in tea plantations, notably intercropping tea plants with Chinese chestnut. This approach benefits tea plant growth, development, and quality compared to pure plantations. In spring, Chinese chestnut trees reduced wind speed and turbulence, thereby minimizing heat exchange between tea plants canopies, facilitating a faster temperature rise in intercropped tea plantations than in monoculture, thus promoting tea plant germination. During summer, the Chinese chestnut canopy shade effectively lowered sun radiation in intercropped plantations, protecting tea plants from high temperatures. In fall and winter, fallen chestnut leaves reduced surface long-wave radiation and soil–air heat exchange, aiding soil heat preservation [10]. However, studies on the impact of intercropping tea plants with Chinese chestnuts on tea quality, particularly concerning key genes, is limited.
Tea plants in Chinese chestnut-tea intercropped plantations outperformed those in pure tea plantations regarding cold and insect resistance, as well as quality. This superiority is attributed to two factors: Firstly, on a macro level, chestnut plants provided excellent protection and support for the growth and development of tea plants. Secondly, at the micro level, certain resistance genes within the tea plants of the Chinese chestnut-tea intercropped plantation are highly expressed, enhancing cold and insect resistance, thus elevating overall quality as compared to pure tea plantation. Previous studies suggested the significant involvement of the AFS gene in insect and cold resistance. Consequently, tea plants within the Chinese chestnut-tea intercropped plantation likely exhibited better resistance compared to those in pure tea plantations, a correlation closely linked to the AFS gene. Transcriptome [11] analysis of the Chinese chestnut-tea intercropped plantation identified four AFS genes: AFS1 (LOC114298667), AFS2 (LOC114266406), AFS3 (LOC114293286), and AFS4 (LOC114257853). After analyzing the AFS2 gene expression through qPCR following various hormone, drought, salt, and low-temperature treatments, we observed a rapid and robust induction of AFS2 expression, prompting further intensive investigation. Consequently, we successfully cloned its full length, designating it as CsAFS2. Employing heterologous genetic transformation in tobacco, we subjected CsAFS2 transgenic tobacco to low-temperature stress and aphid feeding. This approach aimed to explore alterations in osmotic regulatory substances and protective enzyme activities in transgenic tobacco under both biotic and abiotic stresses, laying the groundwork for functional analysis and expression patterns of AFS genes in tea plants intercropped with Chinese chestnut. This study contributes to a comprehensive understanding of AFS genes. Additionally, our findings reveal superior tea plant quality in the Chinese chestnut-tea intercropped plantation compared to pure tea plantations. Furthermore, we utilized the CsAFS2 gene to elucidate the resistance mechanism of tea plants in the Chinese chestnut-tea intercropped plantation.

2. Results

2.1. qRT-PCR Expression Analysis of AFS1, AFS2, AFS3, and AFS4

The relative expression of AFS2 surpassed that of AFS1, AFS3, and AFS4 across various hormone, drought, salt, and low-temperature treatments (Figure 1a–d). Therefore, we focused our research on AFS2. Following MJ, SA, and GA3 treatments, AFS2’s relative expression increased by 8.0-, 4.7-, and 13.3-fold compared to the control, respectively. Notably, its peak relative expression, 22.4-fold higher than the control, occurred after 30 min at 4 °C (Figure 1b).

2.2. Gene Cloning and Sequence Analysis

The AFS2 gene was cloned from tea plants intercropped with Chinese chestnut. Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis showed substantial similarity between this gene and AFS gene of Theaceae plants, leading to its designation as CsAFS2 (Figure 2a). The CsAFS2 gene (Genbank: OM888666) spanning 1683 bp features open reading frames encoding 560 amino acids (Figure 2b).

2.3. Genetic Transformation in Tobacco

Infiltrating tobacco leaves with Agrobacterium tumefaciens sap via the pCAMBIA1300-CsAFS2 overexpression vector induced resistant buds on MS 3 media containing hyg. These buds, reaching 1–2 cm, were transferred to MS 4 media for seedling reinforcement. Upon reaching 3–5 cm, tobacco seedlings were shifted to MS 5 media for rooting and plant formation (Figure 3). By the following qRT-PCR analysis, transgenic efficiency reached 85%.

2.4. Generation and Screening of Transgenic Tobacco Lines

Twenty T1 tobacco lines were acquired, and their seeds were harvested and sown. Subsequently, twenty T2 transgenic tobacco lines were generated. Transgenic tobacco DNA served as the template for PCR, utilizing primers designed for the hygromycin transferase gene. Ten positive lines were identified through PCR screening. Comparative analysis against the empty vector control revealed ten positive lines, from which three high-expression lines—CsAFS2-OE9, CsAFS2-OE26, and CsAFS2-OE31—emerged. Their expression levels exceeded those of the control by 420.26-, 370.09-, and 600.45-fold, respectively (Figure 4).

2.5. Phenotype Observation of the CsAFS2 Transgenic Lines

No significant differences were observed in plant height, leaf length, and leaf width between transgenic tobacco plants and the control. After 12 h of aphid feeding, phenotypic changes were insignificant in both plant types (Figure 5a,b). However, following exposure to low temperatures for the same duration, the control tobacco plants wilted noticeably, while transgenic ones remained upright, indicating enhanced cold resistance conferred by the CsAFS2 gene (Figure 6a(i–iv)). An examination of tobacco stem trichomes revealed that transgenic tobacco had more numerous and longer trichomes compared to the control (Figure 6b(i–iv)). Electron microscopy analysis of freehand sections showed that control plants had around 10 trichomes per field of view (20×), ranging from 0.52 to 1.13 mm in length, with an average length of ~0.83 mm. In contrast, transgenic tobacco had 20–30 trichomes ranging from 2.16 to 3.18 mm in length, with an average length of about 2.67 mm, resulting in trichome length and density three-fold higher than that of control plants (Figure 6c(i–iv)). This indicated that transgenic tobacco trichomes were denser and longer, potentially enhancing resistance to piercing-sucking insects.

2.6. Analysis of Cold Resistance of CsAFS2-Overexpressing Tobacco Plants

After 4 °C treatment, the relative conductivity increased in two transgenic tobacco lines, CsAFS2-OE9 and CsAFS2-OE31, by 1.06- and 1.22-fold, respectively, compared to 25 °C. Conversely, in CsAFS2-OE26, it decreased by 0.93-fold (Figure 7a). The MDA content in transgenic tobacco increased by 2.50-, 1.20-, and 1.40-fold after 4 °C treatment, significantly lower than in the control tobacco plant (Figure 7b), indicating stronger cold tolerance in CsAFS2 transgenic lines than in the control.
Following 4 °C treatment, compared to 25 °C, soluble protein content in transgenic tobacco increased by 1.33-, 1.11-, and 1.10-fold (Figure 7c); soluble sugar content by 1.50-, 1.54-, and 1.36-fold (Figure 7d); and proline contents by 1.67-, 2.13-, and 1.25-fold (Figure 7e). These contents in transgenic tobacco after 4 °C treatment were significantly higher than those at 25 °C and in the control tobacco plant, demonstrating stronger cold tolerance in CsAFS2 transgenic lines compared to the control tobacco plant.
Following 4 °C treatment, transgenic tobacco exhibited notable enhancements in POD, SOD, and CAT activities. Specifically, POD activity increased by 1.42-, 1.61-, and 1.50-fold (Figure 7f); SOD activity by 3.81-, 1.43-, and 1.52-fold (Figure 7g); and CAT activity by 2.19-, 1.35-, and 2.13-fold (Figure 7h). These activities were significantly higher than those observed at 25 °C and in the control tobacco plant, which indicated enhanced cold tolerance in CsAFS2 transgenic lines.
Moreover, after 12 h at 4 °C, the relative expression of four cold-resistance genes—NtCBF1, NtCBF3, NtDREB2B, and NtCOR47—significantly increased compared to 25 °C and the control tobacco plant (Figure 7i–l). This underscores CsAFS2’s positive influence on cold-resistance gene expression, thereby improving plant low-temperature resistance.

2.7. Insect Resistance Analysis of CsAFS2-Overexpressing Tobacco Plants

Following a 24 h inoculation with aphids, transgenic tobacco showed increased enzyme activities. Specifically, POD activity rose by 16%, 22%, and 33% (Figure 8a), while SOD activity increased by 19%, 21%, and 34% (Figure 8b). However, CAT activity did not significantly differ from pre-aphid feeding levels (Figure 8c). Subsequently to aphid inoculation, POD, SOD, and CAT activities in transgenic tobacco surpassed both their pre-aphid feeding levels and those observed in the control tobacco plants, indicating enhanced insect resistance in the CsAFS2-transgenic tobacco compared to controls.
Twenty-four hours post-aphid inoculation, the relative expression of four insect resistance genes—NtCPI1, NtChiA, NtCAF1, and NtTD—significantly exceeded pre-inoculation levels and surpassed expression in the control tobacco plants (Figure 8d–g).

2.8. The CsAFS2 Gene Promoter Analysis

After subjecting transgenic tobacco leaves to a 12 h low-temperature treatment at 4 °C, GUS staining revealed evident blue staining (Figure 9), confirming the low-temperature-inducible nature of the CsAFS2 promoter. This observation reinforces the resistance function of the AFS gene. The CsAFS2 promoter contained various core elements, including hormone response, light response, and defense-related elements. Notable among these are cis-acting regulatory elements responsive to plant growth regulators such as methyl jasmonate (MJ) (CGTCA-motif, TGACG-motif), gibberellic acid (GA3) (TATC-box), salicylic acid (SA) (TCA-element), and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (CTTGTGT-box). Stress-related elements include MYCATRD22, MYBCORE, and LTRE1HVBLT49 (Table 1 and Table 2).

3. Discussion

3.1. Effects of Trichomes on Plant Stress Resistance

Trichomes play a vital protective role in plants. This study revealed that transgenic tobacco exhibited increased and elongated trichomes compared to the control. These epidermal structures, integral to specialized epidermal cells, significantly bolstered plant defenses against insects and pathogens, while enhancing resistance to freezing and other stressors [12]. In cotton, trichomes deterred bollworm hatching on leaves and petioles, thus mitigating bollworm damage [13]. Similarly, in tomatoes, the TF Wooly’s homologous structural domain regulated SlCycB2, a cell cycle protein gene, governing type I trichome development. Through mutation of the Y2001 NtCycB2 gene, the HY2001 line exhibited enhanced resistance to oxidative stress, aphids, and cold [14,15]. RNA-seq analysis of stem segment trichomes and leaves in tea plants revealed higher AFS gene expression in trichomes, indicating its pivotal role in trichome formation. Additionally, in Opisthopappus taihangensis, trichome density positively correlated significantly with terpenoid content, particularly α-farnesene [16,17,18]. In hops, both the HlAFS1 and HlAFS2 genes significantly influenced trichome growth and the aroma emitted by hops [19]. Glandular trichomes serve as production and storage organs for specialized metabolites like terpenes, crucial in plant defense. Transcriptome data from tomato trichomes reveal that MYC, bHLH, and WRKY can activate the S. lycopersicum terpene synthase promoter, facilitating trichome growth [20,21,22]. Furthermore, previous studies underscored the significance of, MYC, bHLH, and WRKY, along with terpenoids, in trichome growth and development, with their cis-elements found in the CsAFS2 promoter sequence. CsAFS2 may interact with MYC, bHLH, and WRKY to co-regulate trichome growth. Identified in tea plants from Chinese chestnut tea plantations, the AFS2 gene potentially influences tea trichome growth, enhancing both plant resistance and tea fragrance. The enhanced “hao xiang” (fragrance) in tea leaves is notable in intercropped plantations, suggesting CsAFS2’s role in regulating trichome development is vital for stress resistance and tea quality improvement in such systems.

3.2. The Combination Analysis of the CsAFS2 Gene and Transcription Factors

The CsAFS2 gene was typically regulated by transcription factors, with its promoter containing WRKY, MYB, MYC, and ERF cis-elements, suggesting interaction likelihood with these transcription factors. In apple, MdAFS expression correlates closely with MdMYC2 and MdERF3. Transformation experiments in apple callus demonstrated elevated MdAFS expression by MdMYC2 and MdERF3 [5]. In Indian sandalwood (Santalum album), ERF positively regulated SaAFS gene expression, enhancing low-temperature resistance via JA biosynthesis and signaling pathways [8]. In spearmint, MsMYB, specific to terpene biosynthesis, positively regulated terpene compound expression [23]. Analysis of the CsAFS2 promoter post-cloning revealed eight MYC and eight ERF cis-elements, implying significant association of CsAFS2 gene expression with MYC and ERF. However, the specific pathway through which MYC and ERF regulate enhanced the CsAFS2 gene expression required further research and validation.

3.3. Regulation of CsAFS2 Gene by Hormone Crosstalks

The CsAFS2 gene responded to various plant growth regulators. In this study, its expression notably increased in transgenic tobacco after treatments with MJ, ABA, ETH, GA3, and SA. The CsAFS2 promoter contains plant growth regulator response elements, including MJ-responsive cis-acting regulatory elements (CGTCA-motif, TGACG-motif), GA3-responsive cis-acting elements (TATC-box), SA-responsive cis-acting elements (TCA-element), and an IAA response element (cttgtgt-box). This indicated crosstalk between the CsAFS2 gene and MJ, ABA, ETH, GA3, and SA. In apple, analysis of the MdAFS gene promoter showed that MJ and ETH stimulated α-farnesene synthesis [1]. Research on tobacco heterologous genetic transformation of the apple AFS gene indicated that GA3, IAA, MJ, and ABA promoted α-farnesene synthesis [7]. In citrus, MJ and SA increased AFS expression, enhancing cold resistance [24]. In Arabidopsis, AFS gene expression was promoted after exogenous MJ spraying, making MJ-sprayed lines more insect-resistant than non-MJ-sprayed lines, indicating crosstalk between MJ and AFS and increased plant insect resistance [25]. It is hypothesized that optimal levels of SA, MJ, ABA, and GA3 are crucial in biotic and abiotic stress resistance, leading to terpenoid accumulation. Consequently, this study suggested that in tea plants, SA, MJ, ABA, and GA3 regulate α-farnesene gene expression, thereby enhancing stress resistance. However, due to the complex interactions of plant hormones, further investigation into specific regulatory mechanisms in tea plants is necessary.

3.4. CsAFS2 Might Enhance Insects and Cold Resistance in Plants by Releasing α-Farnesene

The AFS gene significantly enhanced plant resistances, and played a vital role in plant growth and development. The SaAFS gene from Santalum album introduced into Arabidopsis thaliana generated significant cold tolerance via JA biosynthesis and signaling pathways. Tea geometrid poses a severe threat to tea plant growth [8]. When tea plants face tea geometrid attacks, they emit numerous volatiles to repel them, with α-farnesene being pivotal among these [26]. Aphids, significant agricultural pests, are disrupted by α-farnesene, the primary component of aphid alarm pheromones, prompting their dispersal from host plants [27]. Application of ASM (Acibenzolar-S-methyl) to apples triggers a substantial release of α-farnesene, bolstering apple resistance against aphid infestations [28]. Previous studies indicated that α-farnesene is released in response to low temperature and insect pests, playing a crucial role in plant resilience against biotic and abiotic stresses. AFS acts as the primary enzyme regulating α-farnesene synthesis; thus, over-expression of CsAFS2 leads to the accumulation of α-farnesene in transgenic tobacco. Consequently, CsAFS2 enhanced tobacco resistance to low temperature and aphids by modulating the expression of protective enzymes, cold resistance-related genes, and insect resistance-related genes. Subsequent investigations will compare α-farnesene levels in transgenic and wild-type tobacco to further validate the role of CsAFS2 and α-farnesene in plant resistances.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The tender leaves (second leaves from top) from the cultivar C. sinensis ‘Yunkang No.10’, grown in a tea plantation alongside Chinese chestnut in Kunming, were promptly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. As Camellia sinensis lacks a robust homologous transformation system, tobacco served as the model plant for heterologous genetic transformation. Tobacco cultivation occurred in a tissue culture room maintained at a consistent 25 °C, with daily light exposure lasting 10–12 h and a 65%–75% humidity range.
A total of seven different cultural media were utilized in this study. YEB 1 (Agrobacterium rhizogenes liquid medium), comprising YEB + 100 mg/L Rif (Rifampin) + 100 mg/L Kan (Kanamycin) + 6.5 g/L Agar), and YEB 2, comprising YEB + 100 mg/L Rif + 100 mg/L Kan, were applied for spreading and shaking bacteria during the transformation step. MS (Murashig and Skoog medium) 1: 3% MS + 6.5 g/L Agar + 30 g/L sucrose was employed for infection in the genetic transformation process. MS 2: 3% MS + 2.25 mg/L 6-BA (6-Benzylamino purine) + 0.3 mg/L NAA (Naphthylacetic acid) + 6.5 g/L Agar was used in the genetic transformation. MS 3: 3% MS + 2.25 mg/L 6-BA + 0.3 mg/L NAA + 20 mg/L Hyg (Hygromycin) + 400 mg/L Cef (Cephalosporin) + 6.5 g/L Agar served for the preliminary screening of transformants obtained through genetic transformation. Finally, MS 4: 3% MS + 0.1 mg/L 6-BA + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 20 mg/L Hyg + 400 mg/L Cef + 6.5 g/L Agar was utilized for the rooting culture of transgenic tobacco.

4.2. Expression of AFS1, AFS2, AFS3, and AFS4 Genes under Different Plant Growth Regulators and Low Temperature

Transcriptome data analysis revealed the presence of AFS1, AFS2, AFS3, and AFS4 genes in tea plants from plantations intercropped with Chinese chestnut, compared to those in pure tea plantations. NCBI Primer-BLAST facilitated the design of qPCR primers for AFS1, AFS2, AFS3, AFS4, and Actin genes, which were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Samples, including untreated leaves as controls, were collected after 2 h of treatment. Cold resistance analysis involved exposing tea plant leaves to 4 °C for varying durations: 0, 10, 30, 60, and 120 min. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed on these treated leaves for subsequent qPCR analysis. Utilizing the 2−ΔΔCt method, relative expression levels of the AFS2 gene were quantified under different plant growth regulators, high-salt, drought, and low-temperature treatments.

4.3. The CsAFS2 Gene Cloning

RNA was extracted following Magen’s RNA extraction kit protocol (Magen Biotech, Guangzhou, China). Specific cloning primers P1-F and P1-R were designed using the NCBI online platform. The cDNA, obtained from reverse transcription, served as a template for CsAFS2 full-length sequence amplification. Gel recovery kit was used to purify the destination bands (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The target band was ligated into a cloning vector and transformed into E. coli receptor cells.

4.4. The CsAFS2 Gene Promoter Cloning and Sequence Analysis

DNA was extracted from tea plant leaves using the TIANGEN DNA Secure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The extracted DNA underwent 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis evaluation. Specific cloning primers P11-F and P11-R, designed via NCBI online, amplified the target fragment using diluted DNA as a template according to the PCR amplification system. Electrophoresis analyzed PCR products, and gel DNA recovery kit (TAKARATM Gel DNA Recovery Kit) purified the destination bands. The target band was ligated into a cloning vector and transformed into E. coli receptor cells. Positive colonies underwent sequencing; the obtained sequence, named CsAFS2pro, was analyzed on New PLACE for promoter action elements. The pCsAFS2:GUS expression vector was constructed by ligating the GUS gene with a 277 bp fragment containing main functional elements in the promoter, transferred into Agrobacterium EHA105, and transformed into tobacco via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

4.5. Construction of Overexpression Vectors, Genetic Transformation and Identification of Transgenic Lines

The BamHI and PstI enzymes were utilized for targeting specific genes, followed by linearizing cloning vectors via agarose gel electrophoresis, cutting gels, and DNA recovery (TAKARATM Gel DNA Recovery Kit). The resulting cleavage product was then purified using a purification kit. Subsequently, the target fragment was ligated into the pCAMBIA1300-35S vector, which was further transformed into E. coli for screening positive clones and subsequent sequencing The extracted plasmids were then introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101.
Tobacco leaf discs, each measuring 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, were subjected to a 10 min incubation with Agrobacterium-infused MS1 media. Post-infestation, the leaves were drained of surface sap and placed dorsal side up onto MS2 media for co-culturing in darkness. After 48 h on MS2 media, the leaves were transferred dorsal side down onto MS3 media to induce resistant buds and screen cultures. Upon reaching 1–2 cm, the resistant buds were isolated and transferred to MS4 media. Upon consistent growth to 3–5 cm, they were moved to MS5 media for rooting. Transgenic tobacco DNA was then extracted, and primers for hygromycin transferase and cas genes were designed for PCR screening of positive lines. All positive lines were further analyzed for expression using qPCR to identify those with higher expression levels. Additionally, the empty vector pCAMBIA1300-35S was transformed into tobacco plants as a control.

4.6. Observations on the Phenotype of Transgenic Tobacco

Tobacco trichomes length and density were observed using the freehand slicing method and an electron microscope (LEICA DM2000).

4.7. Low-Temperature Stress in Transgenic Tobacco

Six-week-old T2 generation control tobacco plant and the transgenic tobacco field seedlings with uniform growth were subjected to 4 °C in a constant light incubator for 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. Three biological replicates were performed for each line. Following low-temperature treatment, tobacco phenotypes were assessed, and leaves were stored at −80 °C.

4.8. Aphid Feeding Stress in Transgenic Tobacco

Six-week-old T2 generation control tobacco plant and transgenic tobacco field seedlings with uniform growth were selected. Twenty numbers of the 4th instar larvae of aphids were placed to feed on the second mature leaf from top to bottom for durations of 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. Three biological replicates were conducted for each line. Tobacco phenotypes were observed, and combined samples of the 3rd and 4th tobacco leaves from top to bottom were collected and stored at −80 °C for subsequent analysis.

4.9. Determination of Physiological and Biochemical Indices of Transgenic Tobacco

The soluble protein content was assessed via the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 method, soluble sugar content via anthrone colorimetry, and malondialdehyde content through thiobarbituric acid colorimetry. The free proline content was determined using the acid ninhydrin method. CAT, POD, and SOD activities were detected via UV absorption, guaiacol, and riboflavin NBT methods, respectively. Each parameter underwent three tests, and their average values were recorded.

4.10. Expression Analysis of Stress-Related Genes in Transgenic Tobacco

qRT-PCR primers for tobacco cold resistance genes NtCBF1, NtDREB2B, NtCBF3, and NtCOR4 (Table 3), and four tobacco insect resistance genes NtChiA, NtTD, NtCPI1, and NtCAF1 (Table 4) were designed and synthesized by the Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The RNA extracted from tobacco leaves stressed by low temperature and aphid feeding was quality-checked, reverse-transcribed into the cDNA, and then subjected to qRT-PCR. The expression of cold and insect resistance genes in the stress-treated control tobacco plant and the transgenic tobacco was analyzed.

4.11. Statistical Analysis and Graphing of Data

Data were processed, analyzed, and charted using the IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0, GraphPad Prism 9, Adobe Illustrator 2023, and Photoshop 2023 software packages, Duncan’s multiple range test was utilized for examining significant differences between groups, one-way ANOVA was used for multiple comparisons, and all data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. A p < 0.05 indicated significance.

5. Conclusions

The CsAFS2 gene significantly enhances plant resistance to low temperatures and insects. In our study, we found that tea plant quality in Chinese chestnut-tea intercropped plantations surpassed that in pure tea plantations. We explored the tea plants’ resistance mechanism in these intercropped plantations, focusing on the CsAFS2 gene.
We mapped out the mechanism of the CsAFS2 gene in the chestnut-tea intercropped system (Figure 10), highlighting its role as a responder to low temperatures and biotic stress. In this environment, changes in light and allelopathic effects may alter hormonal levels in tea plants, triggering the activation of the CsAFS2 gene. This activation is facilitated by the interaction of the CsAFS2 promoter with transcription factors such as WRKY, MYB, MYC, bHLH, and ERF. CsAFS2 enhances protective enzyme activity, thereby improving plant stress resistance. This leads to increased expression of cold-resistant genes such as CBF and insect-resistant genes like CPI, promoting tea plant health in chestnut-tea intercropped plantations. Additionally, CsAFS2 influences trichome growth and density, enhancing cold and insect resistance as well as fragrance in tea plants. Further research is needed to elucidate how CsAFS2 interacted with plant growth regulators and transcription factors such as WRKY, MYB, MYC, bHLH, and ERF to enhance cold and insect resistance in tea plants. Understanding these interactions is crucial for uncovering resistance improvement mechanisms in intercropped tea plantations with Chinese chestnut.

Author Contributions

J.W. conducted the data analysis and finished the manuscript; M.D. and Z.Y. prepared the tables; Y.B. and Y.Q. prepared the figures; T.W. designed the experiments and modified the manuscript. In addition, all authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Joint Special Project of Yunnan Province for Agricultural Basic Research (202301BD070001-242).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, X.; Zeng, L.; Liao, Y.; Li, J.; Tang, J.; Yang, Z. Formation of α-farnesene in tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves induced by herbivore-derived wounding and Its effect on neighboring tea plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dong, F.; Yang, Z.; Baldermann, S.; Sato, Y.; Asai, T.; Watanabe, N. Herbivore-induced volatiles from tea (Camellia sinensis) plants and their involvement in intraplant communication and changes in endogenous nonvolatile metabolites. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 29, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liao, Y.; Yu, Z.; Liu, X.; Zeng, L.; Cheng, S.; Li, J.; Tang, J.; Yang, Z. Effect of major tea insect attack on formation of quality-related nonvolatile specialized metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 6716–6724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, J.; Wang, D.; Chen, X.; Köllner, T.G.; Mazarei, M.; Guo, H.; Pantalone, V.R.; Arelli, P.; Stewart, C.N.; Wang, N.; et al. An (E,E)-α-farnesene synthase gene of soybean has a role in defence against nematodes and is involved in synthesizing insect-induced volatiles. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Q.; Liu, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, S.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, Y. MdMYC2 and MdERF3 positively co-regulate α-farnesene biosynthesis in apple. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 512844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, S.; Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, J.; Jian, G.; Yang, J.; Mao, K.; Zeng, L.; Gu, D. Histone deacetylase CsHDA6 mediates the regulated formation of the anti-insect metabolite α-farnesene in tea (Camellia sinensis). Plant Sci. 2023, 326, 111501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Souleyre, E.J.F.; Bowen, J.K.; Matich, A.J.; Tomes, S.; Chen, X.; Hunt, M.B.; Wang, M.Y.; Ileperuma, N.R.; Richards, K.; Rowan, D.D.; et al. Genetic control of α-farnesene production in apple fruit and its role in fungal pathogenesis. Plant J. 2019, 100, 1148–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; da Silva, J.A.T.; Zhang, T.; Xiong, Y.; Li, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Pan, X.; Ma, G. Characterization of sandalwood (E,E)-α-farnesene synthase whose overexpression enhances cold tolerance through jasmonic acid biosynthesis and signaling in Arabidopsis. Planta 2023, 258, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pokharel, S.S.; Yu, H.; Fang, W.; Parajulee, M.N.; Chen, F. Intercropping cover crops for a vital ecosystem service: A review of the biocontrol of insect pests in tea agroecosystems. Plants 2023, 12, 2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, T.; Duan, Y.; Liu, G.; Shang, X.; Liu, L.; Zhang, K.; Li, J.; Zou, Z.; Zhu, X.; Fang, W. Tea plantation intercropping green manure enhances soil functional microbial abundance and multifunctionality resistance to drying-rewetting cycles. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 151282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, T.; Jiang, Y.; Li, M.; Pu, D.; Shi, M.; Lan, Z. RNA-seq analysis reveals the potential mechanism of improved viability and product quality of tea plants through intercropping with Chinese chestnut. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 96, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meng, Y.; Lyu, X.; Liu, J.; Gao, W.; Ma, Y.; Liao, N.; Li, Z.; Bo, Y.; Hu, Z.; Yang, J.; et al. Structural variation of GL1 gene determines the trichome formation in Brassica juncea. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2023, 136, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fürstenberg-Hägg, J.; Zagrobelny, M.; Bak, S. Plant defense against insect herbivores. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 10242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, Z.; Yan, X.; Zhang, H.; Meng, Y.; Pan, Y.; Cui, H. NtCycB2 negatively regulates tobacco glandular trichome formation, exudate accumulation, and aphid resistance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 108, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Spyropoulou, E.A.; Haring, M.A.; Schuurink, R.C. RNA sequencing on Solanum lycopersicum trichomes identifies transcription factors that activate terpene synthase promoters. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Guo, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhong, J.; Ba, T.; Xu, T.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, M. Identification of the volatile compounds and observation of the glandular trichomes in Opisthopappus taihangensis and four species of chrysanthemum. Plants 2020, 9, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cao, H.; Li, J.; Ye, Y.; Lin, H.; Hao, Z.; Ye, N.; Yue, C. Integrative transcriptomic and metabolic analyses provide insights into the role of trichomes in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Biomolecules 2020, 10, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeng, L.; Liao, Y.; Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, J.; Dong, F.; Yang, Z. α-Farnesene and ocimene induce metabolite changes by volatile signaling in neighboring tea (Camellia sinensis) plants. Plant Sci. 2017, 264, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, X.; Wang, M.Y.; Deng, C.H.; Beatson, R.A.; Templeton, K.R.; Atkinson, R.G.; Nieuwenhuizen, N.J. The hops (Humulus lupulus) genome contains a mid-sized terpene synthase family that shows wide functional and allelic diversity. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, J.; van Herwijnen, Z.O.; Dräger, D.B.; Sui, C.; Haring, M.A.; Schuurink, R.C. SlMYC1 regulates type VI glandular trichome formation and terpene biosynthesis in tomato glandular cells. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2988–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hua, B.; Chang, J.; Wu, M.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Yang, M.; Xu, H.; Wang, L.; Chen, X.; Wu, S. Mediation of JA signalling in glandular trichomes by the woolly/SlMYC1 regulatory module improves pest resistance in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 19, 375–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, Q.; Xiang, X.; Liu, D.; Yang, A.; Wang, Y. Tobacco transcription factor NtbHLH123 confers tolerance to cold stress by regulating the NtCBF pathway and reactive oxygen species homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Reddy, V.A.; Wang, Q.; Dhar, N.; Kumar, N.; Venkatesh, P.N.; Rajan, C.; Panicker, D.; Sridhar, V.; Mao, H.; Sarojam, R. Spearmint R2R3-MYB transcription factor MsMYB negatively regulates monoterpene production and suppresses the expression of geranyl diphosphate synthase large subunit (MsGPPS.LSU). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1105–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, C.; He, M.; Wang, Z.; Xu, J. Integrative analysis of terpenoid profiles and hormones from fruits of red-flesh citrus mutants and their wild types. Molecules 2019, 24, 3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Body, M.J.A.; Neer, W.C.; Vore, C.; Lin, C.-H.; Vu, D.C.; Schultz, J.C.; Cocroft, R.B.; Appel, H.M. Caterpillar chewing vibrations cause changes in plant hormones and volatile emissions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jing, T.; Qian, X.; Du, W.; Gao, T.; Li, D.; Guo, D.; He, F.; Yu, G.; Li, S.; Schwab, W.; et al. Herbivore-induced volatiles influence moth preference by increasing the β-Ocimene emission of neighbouring tea plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 3667–3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jia, D.; Gao, S.; Duan, P.; Chen, J.; Tian, F.; Yu, X. Metabolic engineering of (E)-β-farnesene synthase genes for aphid-resistant genetically modified plants. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 2018, 34, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Warneys, R.; Gaucher, M.; Robert, P.; Aligon, S.; Anton, S.; Aubourg, S.; Barthes, N.; Braud, F.; Cournol, R.; Gadenne, C.; et al. Acibenzolar-S-Methyl reprograms apple transcriptome toward resistance to rosy apple Aphid. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, J.; Wu, H.; He, F.; Qu, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, J.-H. Citrus sinensis CBF1 functions in cold tolerance by modulating putrescine biosynthesis through regulation of arginine decarboxylase. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021, 63, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Perez-Garcia, P.; Pucciariello, O.; Sanchez-Corrionero, A.; Cabrera, J.; del Barrio, C.; del Pozo, J.C.; Perales, M.; Wabnik, K.; Moreno-Risueno, M.A. The cold-induced factor CBF3 mediates root stem cell activity, regeneration, and developmental responses to cold. Plant Commun. 2023, 4, 100737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Dai, Y.; He, Y.; Li, C.; Mao, P.; Ma, X. The transcription factors of tall fescue in response to temperature stress. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sierro, N.; Battey, J.N.; Ouadi, S.; Bakaher, N.; Bovet, L.; Willig, A.; Goepfert, S.; Peitsch, M.C.; Ivanov, N.V. The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, J.; He, X.; Zhou, J.; Dong, Z.; Yu, H.; Tang, Q.; Yuan, L.; Peng, S.; Zhong, X.; He, Y. Selection and verification of standardized reference genes of Angelica dahurica under various abiotic stresses by real-time quantitative PCR. Genes 2024, 15, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vaghela, B.; Vashi, R.; Rajput, K.; Joshi, R. Plant chitinases and their role in plant defense: A comprehensive review. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2022, 159, 110055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fang, M.; Cha, J.-H.; Wang, H.-C.; Ye, P.; Chen, B.; Chen, M.; Yang, W.-H.; Yan, X. An undefined cystatin CsCPI1 from tea plant Camellia sinensis harbors antithrombotic activity. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 159, 114285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schäfer, M.; Meza-Canales, I.D.; Navarro-Quezada, A.; Brütting, C.; Vanková, R.; Baldwin, I.T.; Meldau, S. Cytokinin levels and signaling respond to wounding and the perception of herbivore elicitors in Nicotiana attenuata. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2015, 57, 198–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Walley, J.W.; Kelley, D.R.; Savchenko, T.; Dehesh, K. Investigating the function of CAF1 deadenylases during plant stress responses. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 802–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Expression analysis of AFS1, AFS2, AFS3, and AFS4. (a) relative expression of AFS1; (b) relative expression of AFS2; (c) relative expression of AFS3; (d) relative expression of AFS4. Different small letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, and the same below.
Figure 1. Expression analysis of AFS1, AFS2, AFS3, and AFS4. (a) relative expression of AFS1; (b) relative expression of AFS2; (c) relative expression of AFS3; (d) relative expression of AFS4. Different small letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, and the same below.
Forests 15 00380 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree and multiple comparison of AFS2. (a) Phylogenetic tree; (b) multiple sequence alignment. The red dots in the figure indicate the gene involved in this study.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree and multiple comparison of AFS2. (a) Phylogenetic tree; (b) multiple sequence alignment. The red dots in the figure indicate the gene involved in this study.
Forests 15 00380 g002
Figure 3. Genetic transformation of tobacco in different periods. (a) resistant bud induction; (b) isolation of resistant buds; (c) strong seedling culture; (d) rooting culture; (e) formation of independent lines.
Figure 3. Genetic transformation of tobacco in different periods. (a) resistant bud induction; (b) isolation of resistant buds; (c) strong seedling culture; (d) rooting culture; (e) formation of independent lines.
Forests 15 00380 g003
Figure 4. Expression analyzed of transgenic lines. Different small letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, and the same below.
Figure 4. Expression analyzed of transgenic lines. Different small letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, and the same below.
Forests 15 00380 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of the control tobacco plant and transgenic tobacco before and after inoculation with aphids. (a) The control tobacco plant inoculated with aphids for 12 h; (b) transgenic tobacco inoculated with aphids for 12 h.
Figure 5. Comparison of the control tobacco plant and transgenic tobacco before and after inoculation with aphids. (a) The control tobacco plant inoculated with aphids for 12 h; (b) transgenic tobacco inoculated with aphids for 12 h.
Forests 15 00380 g005
Figure 6. Phenotype observation of the CsAFS2 transgenic tobacco. (a) The transgenic tobacco lines at 4 °C for 12 h; (b) trichome of the CsAFS2 transgenic tobacco and the control tobacco plant; (c) trichome observed under the microscope (20×); (i) the control tobacco plant; (iiiv) transgenic tobacco lines.
Figure 6. Phenotype observation of the CsAFS2 transgenic tobacco. (a) The transgenic tobacco lines at 4 °C for 12 h; (b) trichome of the CsAFS2 transgenic tobacco and the control tobacco plant; (c) trichome observed under the microscope (20×); (i) the control tobacco plant; (iiiv) transgenic tobacco lines.
Forests 15 00380 g006
Figure 7. Physiological and biochemical indicators, and four cold resistance genes of the transgenic tobacco and the relative expression of four cold resistance genes under 4 °C treatment. (a) The relative conductivity; (b) the MDA content; (c) the soluble protein content; (d) the soluble sugar content; (e) the proline content; (f) POD activity; (g) the SOD activity; (h) the CAT activity; (i) the relative expression of NtCBF1; (j) the relative expression of NtCBF3; (k) the relative expression of NtCOR47; (l) the relative expression of NtDREB2B. Note: the bar chart shows the mean of the three biological replicates, and the error bars are standard deviations, and the asterisks indicates statistical difference in one-way analysis of variance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, ns means no significant difference).
Figure 7. Physiological and biochemical indicators, and four cold resistance genes of the transgenic tobacco and the relative expression of four cold resistance genes under 4 °C treatment. (a) The relative conductivity; (b) the MDA content; (c) the soluble protein content; (d) the soluble sugar content; (e) the proline content; (f) POD activity; (g) the SOD activity; (h) the CAT activity; (i) the relative expression of NtCBF1; (j) the relative expression of NtCBF3; (k) the relative expression of NtCOR47; (l) the relative expression of NtDREB2B. Note: the bar chart shows the mean of the three biological replicates, and the error bars are standard deviations, and the asterisks indicates statistical difference in one-way analysis of variance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, ns means no significant difference).
Forests 15 00380 g007
Figure 8. Antioxidant enzyme activities, and four insect resistance genes of the control tobacco plant and the CsAFS2 gene plant after inoculation with aphids. (a) The POD activity; (b) the SOD activity; (c) the CAT activity; (d) the relative expression level of NtCPI1; (e) the relative expression level of NtChiA; (f) the relative expression level of NtCAF1; (g) the relative expression level of NtTD; 0 h means not inoculated with aphids, 24 h means 24 h after inoculated with aphids. Note: the bar chart shows the mean of the three biological replicates, and the error bars are standard deviations, and the asterisks indicates statistical difference in one-way analysis of variance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, ns means no significant difference).
Figure 8. Antioxidant enzyme activities, and four insect resistance genes of the control tobacco plant and the CsAFS2 gene plant after inoculation with aphids. (a) The POD activity; (b) the SOD activity; (c) the CAT activity; (d) the relative expression level of NtCPI1; (e) the relative expression level of NtChiA; (f) the relative expression level of NtCAF1; (g) the relative expression level of NtTD; 0 h means not inoculated with aphids, 24 h means 24 h after inoculated with aphids. Note: the bar chart shows the mean of the three biological replicates, and the error bars are standard deviations, and the asterisks indicates statistical difference in one-way analysis of variance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, ns means no significant difference).
Forests 15 00380 g008
Figure 9. GUS straining of leaves of positive, and WT lines treated at 4 °C for 12 h. (a) The control tobacco plant lines; (b) the positive lines.
Figure 9. GUS straining of leaves of positive, and WT lines treated at 4 °C for 12 h. (a) The control tobacco plant lines; (b) the positive lines.
Forests 15 00380 g009
Figure 10. Model diagram of resistance to cold and insects of CsAFS2 genes.
Figure 10. Model diagram of resistance to cold and insects of CsAFS2 genes.
Forests 15 00380 g010
Table 1. Prediction of cis-elements in the promoter of CsAFS2.
Table 1. Prediction of cis-elements in the promoter of CsAFS2.
Possible Binding Transcription FactorsCore SequencePossible FunctionsName of cis-ElementNumber
WRKYTGACTGAC core containing W-box, transcriptional repressor of gibberellin signaling pathwayWRKY71OS7
WRKY, ERFTGACYInvolved in activation of ERF3 gene by woundingWBOXNTERF32
WRKYCTGACYInvolved in elicitor-responsive transcription of defense genesWBOXNTCHN482
WRKYTTGACPathogen- and SA-responsive elementWBOXATNPR12
WRKYTTTTTTCCGA inductionPYRIMIDNEBOXHVEPB11
MYBCNGTTRRegulation of genes involved in water stress responseMYB-CORE5
MYBTAACAAAAGA-regulated transcription factorMYBGAHV5
MYBTAACAGAGA-responsive elementGARE1OSRER14
MYBMACCWAMCRegulate phenylpropanoid and lignin biosynthesisMYBPLANT3
MYBWAACCAABA-responsive elementMYB1AT4
ERFGCCGCCEthylene responsive elementGCC-CORE2
ERFWTTSSCSSSecondary transcription factor that triggers ethylene signalingERFAT4
bZIPAACGTGPathogen- and JA-responsive elementT/GBOXATPIN23
PBFACACNNGABA-responsive elementDPBFCOREDCDC34
bHLHCCGAAACold-responsive elementsLTRE1HVBLT492
MYCCANNTGMYCCONSENSUSATMYCCONSENSUSAT8
Table 2. Transcription factors from the transcriptome data of tea plants intercropped with Chinese chestnut.
Table 2. Transcription factors from the transcriptome data of tea plants intercropped with Chinese chestnut.
Possible Binding Transcription FactorsGene IdDescriptionE-ValueLog2FC
Pure Tea PlantationIntercropped Tea Plantation
WRKYLOC114289849WRKY14.00 × 10−1109.52 ± 0.3312.08 ± 0.51
LOC114315408WRKY1054.00 × 10−5214.68 ± 0.2619.65 ± 0.41
LOC114314481WRKY67.00 × 10−1028.21 ± 0.1710.43 ± 0.71
LOC114299830WRKY85.00 × 10−993.38 ± 0.085.79 ± 0.13
LOC114256467WRKY242.00 × 10−14214.36 ± 0.6315.01 ± 0.86
LOC114284484WRKY459.00 × 10−380 ± 0.000.06 ± 0.01
LOC114287654WRKY231.00 × 10−510.48 ± 0.040.18 ± 0.02
LOC114299833WRKY383.00 × 10−532.23 ± 0.071.08 ± 0.09
LOC114275007WRKY106.00 × 10−135.25 ± 0.115.27 ± 0.24
LOC114259259WRKY706.00 × 10−307.22 ± 0.376.84 ± 0.43
MYBLOC114284747MYB361.00 × 10−1370.04 ± 0.010 ± 0.00
LOC114271197MYB445.00 × 10−253.57 ± 0.595.76 ± 0.64
LOC114277061MYB884.00 × 10−1205.17 ± 0.225.07 ± 0.18
LOC114262164MYB1053.00 × 10−360.07 ± 0.020 ± 0.00
LOC114308355MYB42.00 × 10−5416.89 ± 1.2216.38 ± 1.37
LOC114262089MYB163.00 × 10−11738.28 ± 1.4540.24 ± 1.47
LOC114322988MYB863.00 × 10−893.88 ± 0.763.31 ± 0.45
LOC114295878MYB1011.00 × 10−670.04 ± 0.000 ± 0.00
LOC114277090MYB58.00 × 10−11417.56 ± 2.3716.64 ± 1.56
LOC114277091MYB103.00 × 10−366.03 ± 0.843.83 ± 0.77
LOC114316900MYB355.00 × 10−1100.04 ± 0.000.05 ± 0.00
LOC114309279MYB611.00 × 10−1215.21 ± 1.245.52 ± 1.57
LOC114292749MYB21.00 × 10−1140.05 ± 0.020 ± 0.00
LOC114285525MYB522.00 × 10−1000.18 ± 0.070.63 ± 0.14
LOC114297472MYB153.00 × 10−831.78 ± 0.662.08 ± 1.57
LOC114279142MYB396.00 × 10−810.52 ± 0.130.64 ± 0.37
LOC114276260MYB982.00 × 10−670.34 ± 0.080.19 ± 0.04
LOC114268476MYB1106.00 × 10−490.06 ± 0.020.11 ± 0.00
LOC114281490MYB1111.00 × 10−533.71 ± 0.403.14 ± 0.32
ERFLOC114312023ERF22.00 × 10−681.19 ± 0.062.44 ± 0.09
LOC114319131ERF166.00 × 10−432.34 ± 0.042.69 ± 0.03
LOC114260629ERF181.00 × 10−570.88 ± 0.220.96 ± 0.35
LOC114264712ERF612.00 × 10−544.88 ± 0.147.69 ± 0.27
LOC114288203ERF1099.00 × 10−531.41 ± 0.112.18 ± 0.17
LOC114257849ERF1159.00 × 10−596.37 ± 0.2811.76 ± 0.37
LOC114275420ERF31.00 × 10−382.55 ± 0.344.83 ± 0.95
LOC114268064ERF206.00 × 10−140.08 ± 0.000 ± 0.00
LOC114284734ERF1181.00 × 10−822.04 ± 1.4616.98 ± 1.87
LOC114312929ERF243.00 × 10−540.07 ± 0.000 ± 0.00
LOC114294084ERF262.00 × 10−192.11 ± 0.240.89 ± 0.16
LOC114277320ERF964.00 × 10−60.14 ± 0.000 ± 0.00
LOC114290124ERF1143.00 × 10−440.99 ± 0.192.08 ± 0.42
LOC114300795ERF384.00 × 10−413.65 ± 0.794.38 ± 1.20
LOC114255784ERF343.00 × 10−2715.04 ± 1.0611.92 ± 1.11
MYCLOC114283260MYC2062.66 ± 2.3550.51 ± 1.97
bHLHLOC114261778bHLH969.00 × 10−9512.53 ± 1.0919.05 ± 1.81
LOC114318495bHLH1622.00 × 10−283.66 ± 0.036.47 ± 1.54
LOC114280978bHLH1238.00 × 10−911.94 ± 0.723.18 ± 0.94
LOC114320661bHLH969.00 × 10−9547.71 ± 1.6530.17 ± 1.87
LOC114263002bHLH742.00 × 10−17217.44 ± 1.4716.19 ± 1.75
LOC114289221bHLH1205.00 × 10−310.69 ± 0.070.62 ± 0.00
LOC114288662bHLH1104.00 × 10−786.09 ± 1.017.27 ± 1.25
LOC114281839bHLH1117.00 × 10−810.48 ± 0.000.52 ± 0.08
bZIPLOC114315402bZIP17.00 × 10−221.09 ± 0.271.84 ± 0.62
LOC114279212bZIP24.00 × 10−933.59 ± 0.125.28 ± 0.31
LOC114307154bZIP11023.78 ± 0.9724.26 ± 0.84
Table 3. The qPCR primers for cold resistance genes.
Table 3. The qPCR primers for cold resistance genes.
Gene NameGenBank No.Forward Primer (5′–3′)Reforward Primer (5′–3′)
NtCBF1 [29]NP001312156GGATGAGGAGACGCTATTCTGTGTGAACACTGAGGTGGAGG
NtCBF3 [30]NP001312741TGTGAACACTGAGGTGGAGGCCTCCTCGTCCATAAACAA
NtDREB2B [31]EU727156CGGCCGCCCATCTGAGTCAGGTGGAGGCAGCATTAGTC
NtCOR4 [32]NW015826227.1TGTCATCGAAAAGCTTCACCGATGTCATCGAAAAGCTTCACCGA
EF1α [33]NM001326165TGGTTGTGACTTTTGGTCCCAACAAACCCACGCTTGAGATCC
Table 4. The qPCR primers for insects resistance genes.
Table 4. The qPCR primers for insects resistance genes.
Gene NameGenBank No.Forward Primer (5′–3′)Reforward Primer (5′–3′)
NtChiA [34]P08252.2GGCCTTGTGGAAGAGCCATACCAAATCCAGGGAGGCGATT
NtCPI1 [35]KF0S7988TCTGGAGTTCGGAAAGGTTGTTCAGACCTTGGCTTCGTATGCT
NtTD [36]AAG59585.1ACATGGGTCAAGTTAGGCGGTATAGGGGTGGCAAATGGGC
NtCAF1 [37]NP001312482.1ATCATCATCACGCGGTCGAATTTTGCTGAAAGCTGCCGAC
EF1α [33]NM001326165TGGTTGTGACTTTTGGTCCCAACAAACCCACGCTTGAGATCC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Dao, M.; Yang, Z.; Bai, Y.; Qin, Y.; Wu, T. CsAFS2 Gene from the Tea Plant Intercropped with Chinese Chestnut Plays an Important Role in Insect Resistance and Cold Resistance. Forests 2024, 15, 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020380

AMA Style

Wang J, Dao M, Yang Z, Bai Y, Qin Y, Wu T. CsAFS2 Gene from the Tea Plant Intercropped with Chinese Chestnut Plays an Important Role in Insect Resistance and Cold Resistance. Forests. 2024; 15(2):380. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jianzhao, Mei Dao, Ziyun Yang, Yan Bai, Ying Qin, and Tian Wu. 2024. "CsAFS2 Gene from the Tea Plant Intercropped with Chinese Chestnut Plays an Important Role in Insect Resistance and Cold Resistance" Forests 15, no. 2: 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020380

APA Style

Wang, J., Dao, M., Yang, Z., Bai, Y., Qin, Y., & Wu, T. (2024). CsAFS2 Gene from the Tea Plant Intercropped with Chinese Chestnut Plays an Important Role in Insect Resistance and Cold Resistance. Forests, 15(2), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop