Next Article in Journal
Two Male Poplar Clones (Populus × euramericana ‘Siyang-1’ and Populus deltoides ‘Nanlin 3804’) Exhibit Distinctly Different Physiological Responses to Soil Water Deficit
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Artificial Afforestation on the Soil Microbial Community and Function in Desertified Areas of NW China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Responses of Physiological Traits and Soil Properties in Pinus thunbergia and Euonymus japonicus Saplings under Drought and Cadmium (Cd) Stress

Department of Environmental Science and Ecology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(7), 1141; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071141
Submission received: 19 May 2024 / Revised: 20 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 29 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecophysiology and Biology)

Abstract

:
Pinus thunbergii and Euonymus japonicus are two species commonly found in arid and semi-arid areas; however, their responses in terms of physiological traits and soil properties under drought and cadmium (Cd) stress are not clear. In this study, we carried out single and combined stress treatments consisting of drought and Cd on saplings of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus and investigated the responses in terms of the physiological traits and soil properties of both species. For both species, under single Cd stress, Cd was observed in both the xylem and phloem, while the root Cd2+ flow rate fluctuated at different levels of Cd stress. Under both single and combined stress, as the stress level increased, the abscisic acid (ABA) content of the leaves and roots increased significantly, while the indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) content of the leaves and roots decreased significantly. Moreover, the non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) content of the leaves, stems, and roots, as well as the leaf chlorophyll content, decreased significantly. Under drought stress, the xylem water potential and hydraulic conductivity significantly decreased, which was exacerbated by Cd stress; this led to a more significant decrease in water potential and hydraulic conductivity under the combined stresses. Meanwhile, no significant changes in the conduit lumen diameter and double-wall thickness were observed, except for the double cell wall thickness of the P. thunbergii tracheid, which increased. In addition, both the single stresses and the combined stress of drought and Cd induced significant changes in the soil properties of the two species, i.e., the ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and effective phosphorus of the soil increased significantly, and the increase in content was more significant under combined stress. The diversity of the soil microbial community of P. thunbergii saplings significantly increased, while no change was found in its microbial community abundance under the single stresses and combined stress; however, the diversity and abundance of the soil microbial community in E. japonicus saplings showed the opposite pattern, which indicates that the effect of Cd on soil microorganisms is more significant than the effect of drought. The activity of sucrase and catalase in P. thunbergii soil fluctuated under the single stress and combined stress when compared, and the activity of sucrase in the soil of the E. japonicus species decreased. However, its catalase activity increased significantly under the single drought and Cd stress and combined stress when compared. We found that the combined stresses exacerbated the effects of the single stress in both species. Our study provides more detailed information on the responses in terms of the physiological traits and soil properties of the two species under single and combined stress consisting of drought and Cd.

1. Introduction

Heavy metal contamination and drought stress are widespread environmental issues that represent a serious threat to plants [1,2]. Previous studies have shown that heavy metal ions aggravate drought stress and render plants more susceptible to death [3,4,5]. Cd is a toxic pollutant that can be absorbed by the roots and seriously affects plants’ survival and yields [6]. Moreover, plants grown in arid and semi-arid areas are always subject to heavy metal stress [7]. When plants are under the combined stress of Cd and drought, the negative effects on their growth and development could be more serious [8]. E. japonicus and P. thunbergii are commonly planted in arid and semi-arid areas and both have a high Cd adsorption capacity [9,10], with promising potential for heavy-metal-contaminated soil remediation. However, the effect on their physiological changes and soil properties under drought and Cd stress is not clear.
The Cd2+ flux rate in the plant roots reflects the rate of Cd uptake by plants [11,12]. Previous studies have focused on the differences in the Cd2+ flow rates of different species and ions, i.e., H+, Na+, and Ca2+ at one level of Cd stress, while investigations on the Cd2+ flow rate at different Cd concentrations are rare. Plant cell wall components are composed of pectin, hemicellulose, and cellulose and contain a large number of negatively charged functional groups (e.g., -COOH, -OH, -SH, etc.), which can effectively adsorb and immobilize heavy metal ions [13,14]. The leaf chlorophyll content reflects the photosynthetic ability of plants, and Cd affects the structure and function of chloroplasts through the inhibition of chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthetic electron transport [15], thereby influencing the photosynthetic efficiency. Furthermore, phytohormones like abscisic acid (ABA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA), and jasmonic acid (JA) are useful in reducing the toxicity of Cd, and their concentration regulation serves as a helpful defense against abiotic stresses like heavy metals and drought [16].
Non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) play an important role in plant metabolism, osmoregulation, and water transport [17], such as the regulation of respiration, the maintenance of cellular elongation, xylem and phloem transport, signal passing, and defense [18]. They include starch and soluble sugars. NSC depletion is mainly due to an imbalance between carbon uptake and carbon demand via photosynthesis, also known as carbon starvation, which may also occur only in certain organs [19]. Decreased starch content usually occurs under short-term abiotic stress, while the soluble sugar content is usually maintained above a certain threshold [20]. Previous studies have shown that the changes in the NSC content during Cd and drought stress are different. Specifically, Cd stress reduces toxicity by affecting enzymes related to the synthesis of NSC, while drought results in redistributed NSC content in various parts of the plant. For example, under Cd stress, the NSC content of more than 70 species changed because Cd altered the sucrose phosphate synthase activity and starch phosphorylase activity, thereby influencing the content of soluble sugars and starch [21,22]. Under drought stress, the preferential allocation of carbon to glucose and fructose reflected an increased demand for soluble sugars for osmotic adjustment, thereby promoting the redistribution of the NSC in Hinoki cypress [23,24]. However, how the NSC content changes under the combined stress of Cd and drought has rarely been investigated.
Under drought and Cd stress, a variety of physiological responses, such as changes in Cd2+ inflow and Cd content, changes in cell wall components, a reduction in NSC content, and changes in hormone content, have been observed [25,26,27]. In addition, Cd and drought stress can also cause a decrease in xylem hydraulic conductivity and water potential, leading to plant death [28,29]. Cd stress exacerbates the degree of drought stress in an additive way [4], making the plants more susceptible to morphological, physiological, and xylem anatomical changes.
Drought and Cd stress affect the physicochemical properties of soil, such as the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content, microbial composition, and soil enzyme activity [30,31]. On the one hand, drought directly affects plant physiological processes, such as photosynthesis and respiration, which in turn affect the diversity and abundance of the rhizosphere soil microorganisms [32]. On the other hand, the soil respiration rates and enzyme activity are significantly inhibited at different concentrations of Cd [33]. Therefore, the combined stress of the two may more significantly affect the soil microbial and enzyme activity [34]. Soil microorganisms are one of the most sensitive indicators of changes in the soil environment, and their community structure composition reflects the soil fertility, as well as the relationship between the soil and plants [35]. Soil sucrase enzyme and catalase enzyme activity can reflect the soil’s nutrient conversion capacity and the potential to supply nutrients to the plant roots [36]. However, heavy metal ions such as Cd2+ and Cu2+ can combine with enzyme molecules, leading to a decrease in enzyme activity and the formation of reactive oxygen, resulting in oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA and thus altering the microbial community structure [37]. The ectomycorrhiza (ECM) of the plant is crucial, forming a symbiotic structure with the plant root system, which plays an important role in promoting plant growth and nutrient uptake, the resistance of plants to abiotic stress such as heavy metals, and regulating the soil physicochemical properties, as well as influencing the microbial community of the root soil [38].In addition to altering the physicochemical properties of the soil, soil microorganisms can also regulate the ability of plants to cope with external stress through a variety of mechanisms [39]. Microbes can microbially regulate the plant’s morphological, physiological, and biochemical processes and molecular responses during drought stress as a means to enhance the plant’s resistance [40]. Additionally, microorganisms can promote plant growth and survival under heavy metal stress conditions because they reduce the toxicity of heavy metals to plants by consuming waste and converting complex waste into simple, non-toxic by-products/compounds [38,41]. At the same time, N, P, and other nutrients’ fate and form can vary greatly depending on the soil moisture and Cd stress; the N and P availability and mobility were found to be different under varying levels of drought and Cd stress [42,43].
In this study, we set up single and combined drought and Cd stress experiments and investigated the Cd uptake ability of the two species, by exploring the Cd content of the different organs, the flow rate of Cd2+ uptake in the roots, and the distribution of Cd in the phloem and xylem. Moreover, we investigated the physiological changes under drought and Cd stress, including the cell wall fractions, phytohormone content, leaf chlorophyll content, NSC content, xylem water potential, hydraulic conductivity, xylem conduit/tracheid diameter, and double-wall thickness. Furthermore, we investigated the patterns of nitrogen and phosphorus, the pH, the microbial community, and the sucrase and catalase activity in the soil around the roots of the two species. We hypothesized that more significant responses would be observed under combined stress than under single stress and that drought and Cd stress might have different effects on the different species’ traits.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Material

In June 2023, one- to two-year-old E. japonicus and P. thunbergii saplings that were ordered from nurseries were cultivated in a climate chamber. After washing the soil from the roots of the saplings with tap water and deionized water, the saplings were used for the hydroponic and pot experiments, respectively.
Pot experiment. Six groups were designed from a total of thirty healthy saplings of each species that were all of a similar size. The saplings were cultivated at a temperature of 21 °C to 26 °C in commercial nutrient soil, with 8 h of darkness and 16 h of artificial light per day; the light intensity was set to 4000 lx, and the humidity was kept at 60%. After micro-acclimation for one month, the saplings were treated with drought and/or Cd stress. Two watering patterns (well-watered and slight drought) and two Cd levels (50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg) were set up; Cd stress was applied using CdCl2 (analytically pure, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co, Tianjin, China). The soil water concentration of the well-watered group was 70%–80% of the maximum water-holding capacity of the soil, and the soil water concentration of the slight drought group was 20%–30% of the maximum water-holding capacity of the soil. The experiment consisted of six groups, each with 5 saplings as replications, namely a control (well-watered, no Cd stress, CK), well-watered + 50 mg/kg Cd2+ (50), well-watered + 100 mg/kg Cd2+ (100), drought (D), drought + 50 mg/kg Cd2+ (50D), and drought + 100 mg/kg Cd2+ (100D). After 28 consecutive days of Cd stress, the saplings were rinsed three times with tap water in the laboratory and samples were harvested.
Hydroponic experiment. Twenty additional healthy and uniformly sized saplings were selected, transferred to plastic pots (12 cm in diameter and 15 cm in height) containing Hoagland’s solution, and cultured for 14 days. These saplings were divided into four groups: the Cd group with 50 μmol/L, 100 μmol/L, and 150 μmol/L CdCl2 solution (abbreviated for 50, 100, 150) and the control group without CdCl2 solution (abbreviated as CK). After 28 consecutive days of Cd stress, they were immersed in the test solution for 30 min, followed by measurement.

2.2. Measurement of the Root Cd2+ Flux

Root samples from every sapling were taken in hydroponics following a 14-day period of Cd stress. By using the noninvasive microtext technique (NMT), which can directly reflect the uptake of Cd2+, the Cd2+ flux was determined in the root meristem zone. The Cd2+ concentration (mmol/L level), the flow rate, and the direction of the flow into and out of the root measurement location were measured using a Cd2+-selective microsensor. Detailed information can be found in Li et al., 2024 [44]. The root Cd2+ flux of each seedling was measured for 200 s, and each repetition was performed two to three times.

2.3. Determination of Cd Content of Different Organs

For the determination of the Cd content of each sapling, five saplings from each group were selected, and samples were obtained from the middle parts of the main stem, the leaves, and almost the entirety of the roots. The roots were washed with EDTA solution, and about 0.1 g of the crushed root sample was transferred into a glass digestion tube, 10 mL of concentrated nitric acid was added, and the sample was soaked for 10 h and heated in a digestion furnace for 1.5 h at 80 °C and 3 h at 120 °C. Afterward, at 175 °C, the acid liquid was volatilized to about 1 mL. After cooling, the digested samples were diluted to 25 mL with a 1% solution of nitric acid. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Agilent 7900, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was applied to measure the Cd content of the collected samples. The calculation of the Cd bioaccumulation factors (BCF) and transferring factors (TF) was performed using the following equations: BCF = Cd content in different organs (mg/kg)/Cd content in the nutrient solution (mg/kg), TF from roots to stems = Cd content in stems (mg/kg)/Cd content in roots (mg/kg), TF from stems to leaves = Cd content in leaves (mg/kg)/Cd content in stems (mg/kg).

2.4. In Situ Observation of Cd Distribution in Stem Xylem and Phloem

The middle part of the main stem of the sapling was selected and a 1-cm-long stem sample was cut into longitudinal sections with a thickness of 90 μm using a microtome (Leica SM2010R, Wetzlar, Germany) and freeze-dried using a freeze-dryer (LGJ-12A, Beijing, China). The Cd distribution in the stem xylem and phloem was determined by scanning electron microscopy (TESCAN, Prague, Czech Republic). Detailed information can be found in Li et al., 2024 [44].

2.5. Determination of Cell Wall Component Fraction

The samples were ground in liquid nitrogen, dissolved in 75% ethanol, and allowed to stand in an ice water bath for 20 min. The samples were then centrifuged at 8000× g for 20 min. The resulting precipitates were washed with ice-cold acetone, a methanol–chloroform mixture (1:1, v/v), and methanol, respectively. All steps were performed at 4 °C. After this, the extraction of pectin, hemicellulose, and cellulose from the cell wall was carried out. The absorbance of pectin, hemicellulose, and cellulose was determined by a microplate reader (Synergy H1,Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Specific steps can be found in Li et al., 2024 [44].

2.6. Determination of Leaf Chlorophyll Content

To determine the leaf chlorophyll content, 0.1 g of fresh leaves was collected from 3–5 saplings per group and extracted in 95% ethanol for 24 h. The extract was centrifuged at 8000 r/min for 10 min and the supernatant was taken. The absorbance of the extract was measured at 665 nm, 649 nm, and 470 nm, and the chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B, and carotenoid content was calculated according to the following formulas:
C a = 13.95   ×   A 665   6.88   ×   A 649
C b = 24.96   ×   A 649   7.32   ×   A 665
C c = 1000   ×   A 470     2.05   ×   C a   114.8   ×   C b 245
where Ca is the content of chlorophyll A, Cd is the content of chlorophyll, Cc is the content of carotenoids, A665 is the absorbance at the wavelength of 665 nm, A649 is the absorbance at the wavelength of 649 nm, and A470 is the absorbance at the wavelength of 470 nm.

2.7. Determination of Phytohormone Content (ABA, GA3, IAA, JA)

The roots and leaves of 3–5 saplings per group were collected for the determination of the phytohormone concentrations (ABA, GA3, JA-Me, IAA) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as described by Yang et al. [45].

2.8. Determination of NSC Content

The NSC concentration was determined as described by Liu et al., [46]. For every group, 3–5 saplings were assessed. The leaves, stems, and roots of the saplings were collected and dried in an oven at 105 °C for 30 min, followed by drying at 65 °C for 48 h. Soluble sugars and starch were then extracted and determined. Specific steps can be found in Li et al., 2024 [44].

2.9. Determination of Xylem Hydraulic Traits

The xylem hydraulic traits include the xylem potential and xylem hydraulic conductivity. Every three days, the midday leaf water potential of each seedling was monitored using a pressure chamber (PMS Instruments, Albany, OR, USA). For the xylem hydraulic conductivity measurement, a 2-cm-long stem was collected underwater from the middle parts of 3–5 saplings per group, and the xylem-specific hydraulic conductivity (Ks) was measured using a Sperry apparatus, where the pressure drop of a degassed KCl solution (0.01 mol/L) generates a certain water flow in the stem.
K s = F   ×   L Δ P   ×   A
where F is the velocity of the water flow through the stem, L (m) is the length of the stem, ΔP (MPa) is the pressure difference generating the water flow in the stem segment, and A is the xylem area of the cross-section of the stem segment.

2.10. Determination of Xylem Anatomical Traits

A 2-cm-long sample was selected from the middle of the main stem and the roots of 3–5 saplings per group, and then stored in 70% alcohol and later rehydrated in pure water for 1.0 h. After the rehydration process, the samples were slightly dried and fixed on a microtome (Leica RM2126RT, Leica Camera AG, Wetzlar, Germany). Sections with a thickness of 20 μm were sliced and stained with 1% safranin for 2 min and subsequently dehydrated in 50%, 75%, 95%, and 100% ethanol for several seconds. For the observation and collection of microscopic images, a light microscope (Olympus CX43, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was utilized. A pie-shaped xylem area containing at least 200 consecutive conduits was selected and the conduits’ double-wall thickness and diameter were measured using the ImageJ 1.53 software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.11. Determination of Soil Nutrient (N, P) Content and Enzyme Activity

The soil samples used for the soil nutrient content evaluation were collected near the roots of 3–5 saplings and assessed regarding the NY/T 1121-2006 soil testing standards (MoA, 2006). Briefly, the ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) content was determined by the potassium chloride extraction–indigo phenol blue colorimetric method; the nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) content was determined by the phenol sulfonic acid colorimetric method. The available phosphorus (AP) content was determined by sodium bicarbonate extraction–molybdenum antimony colorimetry. The soil catalase activity was determined by potassium permanganate titration, and soil sucrase was determined by 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid colorimetry.

2.12. Structure of Rhizobacterial Community

Soil DNA was extracted and determined from 0.5 g low-temperature lyophilized rhizosphere soil of 3–5 saplings, according to the user manual of the FastDNA™ SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals LLC, Santa Ana, CA, USA).

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Data were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 (IBM Corp., Almonk, NY, USA). Two-way analyses of variance were performed to analyze the effects of drought, Cd, and their combined stress on the Cd content, phytohormone content, leaf chlorophyll content, NSC content, and xylem hydraulic and anatomical traits, as well as the soil nutrient (N, P, K) content, rhizobacterial community and enzyme activity. The differences between the mean values were compared by Duncan’s tests at a significance level of p < 0.05. The software OriginPro 2023b (OriginLab Corp., Hampton, MA, USA) was used to generate graphs.

3. Results

3.1. Cd Uptake and Accumulation in P. thunbergii and E. japonicus Saplings

The roots of the P. thunbergii and E. japonicus saplings showed a steady instream flow of Cd2+ between 0 and 200 s (Figure 1), and the mean rate of Cd2+ influx fluctuated significantly (p < 0.05). At 100 mmol/L Cd, the fastest average rate of Cd2+ influx of both woody species’ roots, the roots’ Cd2+ flux rate in E. japonicus was 199.57 pmol/cm2·s, which was twice as high as for P. thunbergii. At a 150 mmol/L concentration, the rate of Cd2+ influx was significantly inhibited (p < 0.05) in the two species. Moreover, the Cd accumulation in the roots, stems, and leaves of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus in the different groups was in the order of roots > stems > leaves (Table 1). For both the single Cd stress and combined stress, the Cd content of all organs increased significantly with increased Cd levels in both species (p < 0.05). The TF from the roots to the stems and from the stems to the leaves was higher in E. japonicus than P. thunbergii, and the TF from the roots to the stems was increased significantly in P. thunbergii with increased Cd levels. The BCF of the roots, stems, and leaves decreased in P. thunbergii, but the BCF of the roots, stems, and leaves had no significant change in E. japonicus (Table 2). In addition, we observed that under different concentrations of Cd stress, the phloem and xylem of both the P. thunbergii and E. japonicus saplings were distributed with Cd (Figure S1).

3.2. Physiological Responses of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus Saplings under Cd and Drought Stress

Under drought conditions, Cd affected the cell wall fraction proportion. Under the compound stress, the pectin proportion decreased significantly in the roots and leaves of P. thunbergii, while the E. japonicus saplings showed the opposite. The pectin proportion had no significant change in the stems of P. thunbergii, while that in the E. japonicus saplings increased significantly (p < 0.05). The cellulose and hemicellulose proportions of the roots, stems, and leaves of the two species had significantly different trends (Figure 2, p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the chlorophyll a and carotenoid content decreased with the increasing Cd concentration under Cd and drought stress in the two species (Figure S2). In addition, the ABA content was significantly higher and the IAA content was significantly lower in both the roots and leaves of both species (Figures S3 and S4, p < 0.05).
The NSC content of the roots, stems, and leaves in the two species decreased gradually with the increase in the Cd levels. Under drought stress, the NSC content decreased significantly by 42.04% compared with the CK in the roots (Figure 3, p < 0.05). Under the combined stress, the NSC content decreased significantly in the stems and roots of E. japonicus and in the roots of P. thunbergii, while the NSC content was not significantly changed in the stems and leaves of P. thunbergii. In the leaves of P. thunbergii and in the roots, stems, and leaves of E. japonicus, the starch content was greater than the soluble sugar content, while, in the stems and roots of P. thunbergii, the soluble sugar content was greater than the starch content.
Under combined stress, the xylem water potential and hydraulic conductivity decreased significantly with the increasing Cd concentration in both species (Figure 4a,b and Figure S5, p < 0.05), but there were no significant changes in the xylem conduit lumen diameter (Figure 4e,f, p > 0.05). Moreover, the double-wall thickness of the P. thunbergii tracheid increased significantly (p < 0.05); however, there were no significant changes in the double-wall thickness of E. japonicus conduits (Figure 4c,d, p > 0.05).

3.3. Response of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus Soil Properties to Drought and Cd Stress

The soil physicochemical properties of the two species saplings changed significantly under different Cd concentrations, drought, and combined stress. The soil NH4+-N and NO3-N content and pH increased significantly with increased Cd levels in the two species (Figure 5a,b,d,f,h, p < 0.05); these changes under drought stress were similar for P. thunbergii, while different decreases were found for E. japonicus. Regarding the AP content, there was no change with increased Cd levels in E. japonicus and P. thunbergii, but, under drought stress, the AP content increased significantly for P. thunbergii, while the E. japonicus saplings showed the opposite. It decreased significantly in P. thunbergii, while it increased significantly in E. japonicus under combined stress (Figure 5d,h, p < 0.05).
The rhizosphere soil samples from each group of P. thunbergii had 4648 OTUs (Figure 6a), and the rhizosphere soil of E. japonicus had 2610 OTUs under the different groups (Figure 6b). The soil microbial communities of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus had different dominant phyla (Figure 6c,d). The dominant phyla of the soil microorganisms at the phylum level in P. thunbergii were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, and Chloroflexi, while the dominant phyla of the soil microorganisms at the phylum level in E. japonicus were Proteobacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Chloroflexi, respectively. The dominant phyla of the soil microorganisms at the genus level in P. thunbergii were Devosia, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Nitrospira, while the dominant phyla of the soil microorganisms at the genus level in E. japonicus were Rhodanobacter, Rhizomicrobium, Burkholderia–Caballeronia–Paraburkholderia, and Devosia, respectively. In addition, significant changes in the soil microbial community diversity (p < 0.05), but not the community abundance (p > 0.05), were observed in P. thunbergii under compound stress, while the opposite was found in the soil microbial community diversity and abundance of E. japonicus (Figure 6e–l). Furthermore, there was greater similarity in the microbial community structure between the CK and D groups, and the 50 and 50D groups showed a similar microbial community, as did the 100 and 100D groups, demonstrating that Cd stress has a greater effect on the soil microbial community structure compared with drought (Figure S6).
The sucrase activity in the soil around the roots of P. thunbergii saplings increased, both under single stress and combined stress, with the sucrase activity of the 100, D, and 100D groups significantly increased (p < 0.05) compared to the CK group (Figure 7a). For E. japonicus, the soil sucrase activity of the 100, 50D, and 100D groups decreased significantly (p < 0.05) (Figure 7b). The soil catalase activity of P. thunbergii roots alone did not change significantly (p > 0.05), neither in the single Cd stress nor the drought group, while, in the 50D group, the catalase activity increased significantly (Figure 7c, p < 0.05). However, for E. japonicus, the catalase activity of the soil around the roots significantly increased (p < 0.05) under single stress and combined stress compared with the CK group (Figure 7d).

4. Discussion

4.1. Cd Uptake and Accumulation in P. thunbergii and E. japonicus Saplings

In this study, the Cd content of both woody species increased with the increasing Cd concentration, and the responses under the combined stress were similar to those under single Cd stress, which is in agreement with a previous study and indicates exacerbated effects [47]. In addition, the highest Cd accumulation was found in the roots of both species, whereas the Cd in the leaves was the lowest, which is in agreement with the findings for other woody species [48]. This is probably because the Casparian band impedes Cd’s translocation from the roots [49]. Moreover, we found that P. thunbergii had a higher BCF in the roots than E. japonicus, which was possibly due to its xylem resin canals, which could be advantageous for Cd adsorption [8] and also the adsorption of its ECM.
The dynamic pattern of Cd2+ uptake by the P. thunbergii roots was similar to that of E. japonicus. It fluctuated with the increase in the Cd concentration; specifically, the uptake of Cd2+ increased with the increase in the Cd concentration in the low Cd concentration range, while, when the concentration exceeded a certain range, the inhibition of the Cd2+ flux occurred due to the protein damage associated with Cd absorption [50]. At higher concentrations, both species were able to take in a large amount of Cd2+, even though the Cd2+ flow rate was decreased, which proves that both species have a high Cd2+ uptake capacity. The maximum Cd2+ flux rate of the E. japonicus roots was two times faster than that of P. thunbergii. Interestingly, the Ks of the former was about twice that of the latter, demonstrating that the Ks may be correlated with the root Cd2+ flux, while the exact mechanism behind the higher Cd2+ flux of E. japonicus needs further investigation.
We found Cd in both the xylem and the phloem of the two species, which was in agreement with previous findings [44]. However, it was impossible to quantify the Cd concentrations of the xylem and phloem in this study. Therefore, future studies could be conducted to quantify the Cd content in different tissue types of plants under different Cd stress levels.

4.2. Physiological Responses of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus under Cd and Drought Stress

During the accumulation of Cd in a species, the cell wall acts as the primary barrier, and the pectin in the cell wall plays an important role in Cd fixation [51]. Previous studies have shown that the pectin content rises under heavy metal stress, which is in agreement with the findings of our study, which showed a significant rise in pectin content under Cd and combined stress [52]. Therefore, the increase in the pectin content of the cell wall would prevent more Cd from entering the cells, thus reducing the toxicity of Cd. The content of cellulose and hemicellulose in the cell wall showed diverse changes, which may have been the result of the adaptation of the plant cell wall components to drought and Cd stress, while the specific mechanism needs to be further investigated.
The significant decrease in the chlorophyll content is attributed to the fact that Cd prohibits the synthesis of δ-aminol evulinic acid or inhibits the activity of prochlorophyllate reductase [53,54]. The decline in the chlorophyll content under combined stress in our study was more significant than that in the case of the single Cd stress, which is consistent with others’ results [55]. The reason may be that the compound stress intensifies the destruction of the chloroplast ultrastructure of the plant leaves [56].
In our study, the IAA content decreased significantly and the ABA content increased significantly under the single Cd and drought stress, as well as the combined stress. Under Cd stress, membrane lipid peroxidation is enhanced, which accelerates the decomposition of IAA, leading to a decrease in IAA content [57], which is consistent with the results of this study. Meanwhile, the GA3 content of both species was reduced under drought and Cd stress, probably due to its depletion, reducing the content of endogenous NO, preventing the synthesis of Cd transporter proteins, reducing the Cd uptake, and decreasing the toxicity of Cd [58]. Similar results were also observed by Kaminek et al. [59]. Under drought and Cd stress, the ABA content increased with the increase in the Cd content, and ABA could mitigate the toxic effects of Cd by regulating the synthesis of chelating peptides and alleviating the toxicity of Cd by modulating the antioxidant system [60]. Moreover, the leaf stomata close during drought in isohydric species [61], leading to an increase in ABA content [62]. The changed JA-ME content in both species lead to a decrease in glutathione (GSH) content, which reduces Cd stress [63]. In addition, JA-ME improves drought tolerance by regulating stomatal closure and increasing the organic osmoprotectants and antioxidative enzyme activity, which also effectively alleviates heavy metal damage by increasing the levels of antioxidative enzyme activity and secondary metabolites [64]. Our results regarding the phytohormone content confirm their regulatory role as protective substances against Cd stress.
Under single Cd stress, only the P. thunbergii roots showed a significant decrease in NSC content, probably due to the decreased activity of related enzymes, which is consistent with a previous study [65]. Moreover, under single drought stress, only the P. thunbergii roots’ NSC content significantly decreased, which was probably due to the redistribution of the NSC content during drought [66]. In our results, the NSC content significantly decreased under combined stress, which may have been due to the drought and Cd stress affecting the osmotic pressure and osmoregulation of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus and inducing a stress response, whereas the sustained increase in the soluble sugar content in the leaves, as well as the high content in the roots and stems, indicated that the two species had strong self-regulation and defense abilities against Cd [67].
As Cd enters the cell, it can bind and interact with proteins and phospholipids on the cell membrane, altering the permeability of the cell membrane, leading to a decrease in the permeability of the cell membrane to water molecules and thus reducing the osmotic pressure [29], which leads to a decrease in the water potential of the xylem. Drought stress also significantly reduces the xylem water potential, which is in agreement with Gauthey et al. [68]. In addition, the decrease in water potential under drought and Cd stress may be due to the stimulation of the overall antioxidant defense system by phytohormones such as salicylic acid at enzymatic and non-enzymatic levels, as well as the regulation of the osmotic pressure by proline, soluble sugars, and organic acids, thus increasing the plant’s resistance to combined Cd and drought stress [69]. Cd disrupts the cell membrane system and reduces the activity of aquaporins, which reduces the hydraulic transport function of the xylem [70], and drought exacerbates this change by hindering hydraulic transport, thus reducing the hydraulic conductivity of the xylem of the species.
Previous studies have shown that under drought stress, the xylem conduit diameter decreases significantly [71]. This change is even more significant when coupled with Cd stress [72], and the decrease in the conduit diameter helps to increase the plant’s hydraulic transport capacity [73]. However, in our study, for both species, there was no significant change in the diameter of the conduit; at the same time, the conduit double-wall thickness of E. japonicus did not change significantly, which may have been due to the relatively shorter period of exposure to Cd or the relatively low Cd content. The double-wall thickness of the xylem tracheids of P. thunbergii significantly increased, which may have been due to the toxicity of Cd, which increases the lignin content and accelerates the lignification of the xylem, leading to an increase in the tracheid thickness [74].

4.3. Response of Soil Properties around Roots of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus to Drought and Cd Stress

Ammonium N and nitrate N significantly increased in the soil around the roots of both P. thunbergii and E. japonicus, which may have been because drought leads to the slowing down of the nitrogen transformation processes in the soil and hence the accumulation of ammonium N and nitrate N. In addition, nitrogen’s transformation by microbes may be limited by drought; on the other hand, Cd also inhibits the microbial transformation of nitrogen, thereby causing the accumulation of ammonium N or nitrate N [75]. In addition, some studies have shown that Cd can promote ammonia oxidation and nitrification reactions in the soil, leading to an increase in ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in the soil [76], which is consistent with the results of this study. Under combined stress, the soil AP content decreased in the P. thunbergii saplings, while the soil AP content increased in the E. japonicus saplings; this effect may be species-specific and also depend on the ECM. As conifer species are typical ectomycorrhizal fungal species with a large number of microbial communities in their root systems, their ECMs not only develop a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship with the host plant, but also change the soil pH and N and P content and increase the soil enzyme activity [77], which improves the stability and resistance of the soil environment and reduces stress damage.
Root secretions and soil physicochemical properties can shape the structures of specific bacterial communities [78], which could be one of the reasons for the different microbial structures in the rhizosphere soil of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus in our study. Cd induced and promoted the growth of soil microorganisms from Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria at the phylum level, which are considered to be tolerant to heavy metals [79,80], and it can maintain root nutrient uptake and the rhizosphere soil microbial balance, improve the soil environment, and increase plant resistance. Moreover, the similarity in the microbial community structure between the CK and D groups, between the 50 and 50D groups, and between the 100 and 100D groups indicates that the effect of heavy metals on soil microorganisms is more significant than the effect of drought, which is consistent with previous findings [81,82]. Moreover, changes in the microbial communities in plant rhizosphere soils are also closely related to the inter-root secretions, which was not investigated, representing a limitation of our study.
In our study, with the increased Cd stress levels, the soil sucrase and catalase activity of both species increased to varying degrees, except for the sucrase activity of E. japonicus. Previous studies have shown that under both single stress and combined stress, the content of ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and AP increases in the soil, and the increase in the microbial diversity also increases the enzyme activity [33,83,84], which is consistent with our results.

5. Conclusions

Our study showed that for both species, under single Cd stress, Cd was observed in both the xylem and phloem, while the root Cd2+ flow rate fluctuated at different levels of Cd stress and the Cd content increased significantly with the increasing Cd level. Under both single and combined stress, the ABA content of the leaves and roots increased significantly, while the IAA content of the leaves and roots decreased significantly with the increase in the stress level. Moreover, the NSC content of the leaves, stems, and roots, as well as the leaf chlorophyll content, decreased significantly. In addition, the xylem water potential and xylem hydraulic conductivity significantly decreased under drought stress and combined stress in both species, while the xylem conduit diameter and double-wall thickness showed no change, and the double-wall thickness significantly increased only in P. thunbergii. Furthermore, drought, Cd, and combined stress changed the soil properties of the two species. The soil ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and effective phosphorus increased significantly in both species, and the increase was more significant under combined stress. The diversity of the soil microbial communities in the roots of P. thunbergii increased significantly but the abundance did not change, and the activity of sucrase and catalase was increased to different degrees, whereas the abundance of the soil microbial communities in E. japonicus increased significantly but the diversity had no change, and the activity of soil sucrase decreased while that of catalase increased significantly. We found that the responses of the P. thunbergii and E. japonicus saplings under the combined stress of Cd and drought were more significant than those under single stress, drought stress exacerbated Cd’s toxicity in these species, and Cd stress exacerbated the degree of drought in these two species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f15071141/s1. Figure S1: SEM-EDS images of plant stems under different concentrations of Cd stress; Figure S2: Chlorophyll content under different treatments of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus; Figure S3: Plant hormone content (IAA, JA-Me, GA3, ABA) of roots and leaves under different treatments of P. thunbergii; Figure S4: Plant hormone content (IAA, JA-Me, GA3, ABA) of roots and leaves under different treatments of E. japonicus; Figure S5: Water potential under different treatments of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus; Figure S6: PCoA plot of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus soil microorganisms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L. (Shan Li) and J.W.; methodology, J.W., S.L. (Shan Li) and S.L. (Sen Lu); data curation, J.W. and H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W.; writing—review and editing, S.L. (Shan Li) and J.G.; supervision, S.L. (Shan Li); project administration, S.L. (Shan Li); funding acquisition, S.L. (Shan Li). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32001291; the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi, grant number 2024SF-YBXM-540; and the Talent Project of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, grant number 126022037.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Luo, J.; Tao, Q.; Jupa, R.; Liu, Y.; Wu, K.; Song, Y.; Li, J.; Huang, Y.; Zou, L.; Liang, Y. Role of vertical transmission of shoot endophytes in root-associated microbiome assembly and heavy metal hyperaccumulation in Sedum alfredii. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 6954–6963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, Y.; Hu, J.-C.; Yu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Du, Y.-L.; Zhao, Q.; Du, J.-D. Interactive effects of drought and cadmium stress on adzuki bean seedling growth, DNA damage repair, and Cd accumulation. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 324, 112624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, J.; Li, K.; Zheng, W.; Zhang, H.; Cao, X.; Lan, Y.; Yang, C.; Li, C. Characterization of early transcriptional responses to cadmium in the root and leaf of Cd-resistant Salix matsudana Koidz. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De Silva, N.D.G.; Cholewa, E.; Ryser, P. Effects of combined drought and heavy metal stresses on xylem structure and hydraulic conductivity in red maple (Acer rubrum L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5957–5966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Disante, K.B.; Fuentes, D.; Cortina, J. Response to drought of Zn-stressed Quercus suber L. seedlings. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 70, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shi, G.; Xia, S.; Ye, J.; Huang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Z. PEG-simulated drought stress decreases cadmium accumulation in castor bean by altering root morphology. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 111, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bashir, W.; Anwar, S.; Zhao, Q.; Hussain, I.; Xie, F. Interactive effect of drought and cadmium stress on soybean root morphology and gene expression. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 175, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, S.; Lu, S.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, J.; Liu, P.; Wang, X.; Guo, J. Responses of physiological, morphological and anatomical traits to abiotic stress in woody plants. Forests 2023, 14, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kharazian, P.; Bacchetta, G.; Cappai, G.; Piredda, M.; De Giudici, G. An integrated geochemical and mineralogical investigation on soil-plant system of Pinus halepensis pioneer tree growing on heavy metal polluted mine tailing. Plant Biosyst.-Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2023, 157, 272–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, J.; Qiu, G.; Liu, C.; Lin, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, H.; Fu, Q.; Guo, B. Intercropping of Euonymus japonicus with Photinia× fraseri Improves Phytoremediation Efficiency in Cd/Cu/Zn Contaminated Field. Biology 2022, 11, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, J.; Wan, H.; Qin, S.; He, J.; Lyu, D.; Li, H. Net cadmium flux and gene expression in relation to differences in cadmium accumulation and translocation in four apple rootstocks. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 130, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, Z.; Zeng, P.; Xiao, X.; Peng, C. Physiological, anatomical, and transcriptional responses of mulberry (Morus alba L.) to Cd stress in contaminated soil. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 284, 117387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gall, H.L.; Philippe, F.; Domon, J.-M.; Gillet, F.; Pelloux, J.; Rayon, C. Cell wall metabolism in response to abiotic stress. Plants 2015, 4, 112–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Han, G.H.; Huang, R.N.; Hong, L.H.; Xu, J.X.; Hong, Y.G.; Wu, Y.H.; Chen, W.W. The transcription factor NAC102 confers cadmium tolerance by regulating WAKL11 expression and cell wall pectin metabolism in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 2262–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ma, Y.-L.; Wang, H.-F.; Wang, P.; Yu, C.-G.; Luo, S.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Xie, Y.-F. Effects of cadmium stress on the antioxidant system and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of two Taxodium clones. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1547–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bücker-Neto, L.; Paiva, A.L.S.; Machado, R.D.; Arenhart, R.A.; Margis-Pinheiro, M. Interactions between plant hormones and heavy metals responses. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2017, 40, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Furze, M.E.; Wainwright, D.K.; Huggett, B.A.; Knipfer, T.; McElrone, A.J.; Brodersen, C.R. Ecologically driven selection of nonstructural carbohydrate storage in oak trees. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hartmann, H.; Trumbore, S. Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees–from what we can measure to what we want to know. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 386–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tomasella, M.; Casolo, V.; Aichner, N.; Petruzzellis, F.; Savi, T.; Trifilò, P.; Nardini, A. Non-structural carbohydrate and hydraulic dynamics during drought and recovery in Fraxinus ornus and Ostrya carpinifolia saplings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 145, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martínez-Vilalta, J.; Sala, A.; Asensio, D.; Galiano, L.; Hoch, G.; Palacio, S.; Piper, F.I.; Lloret, F. Dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in terrestrial plants: A global synthesis. Ecol. Monogr. 2016, 86, 495–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shahid, M.A.; Balal, R.M.; Khan, N.; Zotarelli, L.; Liu, G.D.; Sarkhosh, A.; Fernandez-Zapata, J.C.; Nicolás, J.J.M.; Garcia-Sanchez, F. Selenium impedes cadmium and arsenic toxicity in potato by modulating carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, C.; Jiang, X.; Gao, D. Responses of non-structural carbohydrates and biomass in plant to heavy metal treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 909, 168559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tsuji, C.; Dannoura, M.; Desalme, D.; Angeli, N.; Takanashi, S.; Kominami, Y.; Epron, D. Drought affects the fate of non-structural carbohydrates in hinoki cypress. Tree Physiol. 2022, 42, 784–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tomasella, M.; Petrussa, E.; Petruzzellis, F.; Nardini, A.; Casolo, V. The possible role of non-structural carbohydrates in the regulation of tree hydraulics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Piper, F.I.; Paula, S. The role of nonstructural carbohydrates storage in forest resilience under climate change. Curr. For. Rep. 2020, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Z. Cell wall polysaccharide-mediated cadmium tolerance between two Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 522497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guo, J.; Qin, S.; Rengel, Z.; Gao, W.; Nie, Z.; Liu, H.; Li, C.; Zhao, P. Cadmium stress increases antioxidant enzyme activities and decreases endogenous hormone concentrations more in Cd-tolerant than Cd-sensitive wheat varieties. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 172, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rodríguez-Gamir, J.; Xue, J.; Clearwater, M.J.; Meason, D.F.; Clinton, P.W.; Domec, J.C. Aquaporin regulation in roots controls plant hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in Pinus radiata under water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rucińska-Sobkowiak, R. Water relations in plants subjected to heavy metal stresses. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Parsamanesh, S.; Sadeghi, H. Modeling the interactions between inter-correlated variables of plant and soil micro-ecology responses under simultaneous cadmium stress and drought. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 418, 138163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jin, K.; White, P.J.; Whalley, W.R.; Shen, J.; Shi, L. Shaping an optimal soil by root–soil interaction. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Philippot, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Lemanceau, P.; Van Der Putten, W.H. Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lu, H.; Xu, D.; Kong, T.; Wang, D. Characteristics of Enzyme Activities during Phytoremediation of Cd-Contaminated Soil. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zeng, X.-Y.; Li, S.-W.; Leng, Y.; Kang, X.-H. Structural and functional responses of bacterial and fungal communities to multiple heavy metal exposure in arid loess. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 723, 138081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moreno, J.L.; Sanchez-Marín, A.; Hernández, T.; García, C. Effect of cadmium on microbial activity and a ryegrass crop in two semiarid soils. Environ. Manag. 2006, 37, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Qin, W.; Zhao, X.; Yang, F.; Chen, J.; Mo, Q.; Cui, S.; Chen, C.; He, S.; Li, Z. Impact of fertilization and grazing on soil N and enzyme activities in a karst pasture ecosystem. Geoderma 2023, 437, 116578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, R.; Ma, G.; Liu, C.; Wang, C.; Kang, X.; Wu, M.; Zhang, B. Effects of different heavy metal pollution levels on microbial community structure and risk assessment in Zn-Pb mining soils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 52749–52761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gao, T.-T.; Li, G.-l.; Zhou, J.-J.; Ji, R.-Q.; Meng, L.-P. Fungi community structure associated with Korean pine forests and the varying tendency with four forest land age. Nova Hedwig. 2020, 111, 391–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chang, W.-S.; Van De Mortel, M.; Nielsen, L.; Nino de Guzman, G.; Li, X.; Halverson, L.J. Alginate production by Pseudomonas putida creates a hydrated microenvironment and contributes to biofilm architecture and stress tolerance under water-limiting conditions. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 8290–8299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gu, Z.; Hu, C.; Gan, Y.; Zhou, J.; Tian, G.; Gao, L. Role of Microbes in Alleviating Crop Drought Stress: A Review. Plants 2024, 13, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tiwari, S.; Lata, C. Heavy metal stress, signaling, and tolerance due to plant-associated microbes: An overview. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 336111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brown, R.L.; Hangs, R.; Schoenau, J.; Bedard-Haughn, A. Soil nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics and uptake by wheat grown in drained prairie soils under three moisture scenarios. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2017, 81, 1496–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Chi, Y.; Chu, S.; Hayat, K.; Zhi, Y.; Hayat, S.; Terziev, D.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, P. Optimization of NPK fertilization combined with phytoremediation of cadmium contaminated soil by orthogonal experiment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 109997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, S.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Lu, S.; Liu, Z.; Jia, H.; Wei, T.; Guo, J. The response of physiological and xylem anatomical traits under cadmium stress in Pinus thunbergii seedlings. Tree Physiol. 2024, 44, tpae046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. You-Ming, Y.; Chu-Nian, X.; Bao-Min, W.; Jun-Zhen, J. Effects of plant growth regulators on secondary wall thickening of cotton fibres. Plant Growth Regul. 2001, 35, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, C.; Chen, Z.; Liu, S.; Cao, K.; Niu, B.; Liu, X.; Gao, X. Multi-year throughfall reduction enhanced the growth and non-structural carbohydrate storage of roots at the expenses of above-ground growth in a warm-temperate natural oak forest. For. Ecosyst. 2023, 10, 100118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nirola, R.; Megharaj, M.; Beecham, S.; Aryal, R.; Thavamani, P.; Vankateswarlu, K.; Saint, C. Remediation of metalliferous mines, revegetation challenges and emerging prospects in semi-arid and arid conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 20131–20150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zeng, P.; Guo, Z.; Xiao, X.; Peng, C.; Liu, L.; Yan, D.; He, Y. Physiological stress responses, mineral element uptake and phytoremediation potential of Morus alba L. in cadmium-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 109973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Yang, L.; Jin, L.; Song, Y.; Jiang, S.; Qin, L. Transport pathways of cadmium (Cd) and its regulatory mechanisms in plant. Acta Ecol. Sin 2015, 35, 7921–7929. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lan, X.-Y.; He, Q.-S.; Yang, B.; Yan, Y.-Y.; Li, X.-Y.; Xu, F.-L. Influence of Cd exposure on H+ and Cd2+ fluxes in the leaf, stem and root of a novel aquatic hyperaccumulator-Microsorum pteropus. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Colzi, I.; Doumett, S.; Del Bubba, M.; Fornaini, J.; Arnetoli, M.; Gabbrielli, R.; Gonnelli, C. On the role of the cell wall in the phenomenon of copper tolerance in Silene paradoxa L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 72, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jia, H.; Wang, X.; Wei, T.; Zhou, R.; Muhammad, H.; Hua, L.; Ren, X.; Guo, J.; Ding, Y. Accumulation and fixation of Cd by tomato cell wall pectin under Cd stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 167, 103829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Islam, F.; Yasmeen, T.; Ali, Q.; Ali, S.; Arif, M.S.; Hussain, S.; Rizvi, H. Influence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as PGPR on oxidative stress tolerance in wheat under Zn stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 104, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sezgin, A.; Altuntaş, C.; Demiralay, M.; Cinemre, S.; Terzi, R. Exogenous alpha lipoic acid can stimulate photosystem II activity and the gene expressions of carbon fixation and chlorophyll metabolism enzymes in maize seedlings under drought. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 232, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tuver, G.Y.; Ekinci, M.; Yildirim, E. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses to combined cadmium and drought stress in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Rend. Lincei. Sci. Fis. E Nat. 2022, 33, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nawaz, G.; Kang, H. Rice OsRH58, a chloroplast DEAD-box RNA helicase, improves salt or drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis by affecting chloroplast translation. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Thomas, J.C.; Perron, M.; LaRosa, P.C.; Smigocki, A.C. Cytokinin and the regulation of a tobacco metallothionein-like gene during copper stress. Physiol. Plant. 2005, 123, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sharma, S.S.; Kumar, V. Responses of wild type and abscisic acid mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana to cadmium. J. Plant Physiol. 2002, 159, 1323–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kamínek, M.; Motyka, V.; Vaňková, R. Regulation of cytokinin content in plant cells. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 101, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Iori, V.; Pietrini, F.; Bianconi, D.; Mughini, G.; Massacci, A.; Zacchini, M. Analysis of biometric, physiological, and biochemical traits to evaluate the cadmium phytoremediation ability of eucalypt plants under hydroponics. Iforest-Biogeosci. For. 2017, 10, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Klein, T. The variability of stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Funct. Ecol. 2014, 28, 1313–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pang, J.; Turner, N.C.; Khan, T.; Du, Y.-L.; Xiong, J.-L.; Colmer, T.D.; Devilla, R.; Stefanova, K.; Siddique, K.H. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to terminal drought: Leaf stomatal conductance, pod abscisic acid concentration, and seed set. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1973–1985. [Google Scholar]
  63. Per, T.S.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Nitric oxide improves S-assimilation and GSH production to prevent inhibitory effects of cadmium stress on photosynthesis in mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Nitric Oxide 2017, 68, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ali, M.S.; Baek, K.-H. Jasmonic acid signaling pathway in response to abiotic stresses in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Stobrawa, K.; Lorenc-Plucińska, G. Changes in carbohydrate metabolism in fine roots of the native European black poplar (Populus nigra L.) in a heavy-metal-polluted environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 373, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Guo, X.; Peng, C.; Li, T.; Huang, J.; Song, H.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, M. The effects of drought and re-watering on non-structural carbohydrates of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings. Biology 2021, 10, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, L.; Yan, X.; Li, J.; Tian, Y. Physiological and FtCHS gene expression responses to PEG-simulated drought and cadmium stresses in tartary buckwheat seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 41, 3518–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gauthey, A.; Peters, J.M.; López, R.; Carins-Murphy, M.R.; Rodriguez-Dominguez, C.M.; Tissue, D.T.; Medlyn, B.E.; Brodribb, T.J.; Choat, B. Mechanisms of xylem hydraulic recovery after drought in Eucalyptus saligna. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 1216–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Torun, H.; Cetin, B.; Stojnic, S.; Petrík, P. Salicylic acid alleviates the effects of cadmium and drought stress by regulating water status, ions, and antioxidant defense in Pterocarya fraxinifolia. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 14, 1339201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tao, Q.; Jupa, R.; Luo, J.; Lux, A.; Kováč, J.; Wen, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Jan, J.; Liang, Y.; Li, T. The apoplasmic pathway via the root apex and lateral roots contributes to Cd hyperaccumulation in the hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 739–751. [Google Scholar]
  71. Sperry, J.S.; Hacke, U.G.; Pittermann, J. Size and function in conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 1490–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Monni, S.; Uhlig, C.; Hansen, E.; Magel, E. Ecophysiological responses of Empetrum nigrum to heavy metal pollution. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 112, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Knipfer, T.; Barrios-Masias, F.H.; Cuneo, I.F.; Bouda, M.; Albuquerque, C.P.; Brodersen, C.R.; Kluepfel, D.A.; McElrone, A.J. Variations in xylem embolism susceptibility under drought between intact saplings of three walnut species. Tree Physiol. 2018, 38, 1180–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Valentovičová, K.; Halušková, Ľ.; Huttová, J.; Mistrík, I.; Tamás, L. Effect of heavy metals and temperature on the oxalate oxidase activity and lignification of metaxylem vessels in barley roots. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 66, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Badagliacca, G.; Benítez, E.; Amato, G.; Badalucco, L.; Giambalvo, D.; Laudicina, V.A.; Ruisi, P. Long-term effects of contrasting tillage on soil organic carbon, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions in a Mediterranean Vertisol under different crop sequences. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 619, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chen, Y.-T.; Wang, Y.; Yeh, K.-C. Role of root exudates in metal acquisition and tolerance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 39, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rosenstock, N.P.; Berner, C.; Smits, M.M.; Krám, P.; Wallander, H. The role of phosphorus, magnesium and potassium availability in soil fungal exploration of mineral nutrient sources in Norway spruce forests. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 542–553. [Google Scholar]
  78. Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Niu, X.; Yang, Y.; Malik, K.; Jin, J.; Zhao, C.; Tang, R.; Zheng, R.; Huang, R. Phosphorus addition modifies the bacterial community structure in rhizosphere of Achnatherum inebrians by influencing the soil properties and modulates the Epichloë gansuensis-mediated root exudate profiles. Plant Soil 2023, 491, 543–560. [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhu, D.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Wang, Z.-H. Effects of heavy metals on soil microbial community of different land use types. J. Mt. Sci. 2023, 20, 3582–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Yang, T.; Lv, G.; Li, W.; Chen, Y.; Wu, D. Mechanisms underlying the succession of plant rhizosphere microbial community structure and function in an alpine open-pit coal mining disturbance zone. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 325, 116571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Wei, Y.; Deng, Z.; Hao, X.; Li, F. Linear models for describing relations between sensitive bacterial taxa and ecological risk from heavy metals in soils of coal mines in semi-arid region. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2024, 193, 105122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, C.; Zhu, B.; Guo, Y.; Tian, S.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, X. Assessment of the Pollution of Soil Heavy Metal (loid) s and Its Relation with Soil Microorganisms in Wetland Soils. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhao, Y.; Yao, J.; Li, H.; Sunahara, G.; Li, M.; Tang, C.; Duran, R.; Ma, B.; Liu, H.; Feng, L. Effects of three plant growth-promoting bacterial symbiosis with ryegrass for remediation of Cd, Pb, and Zn soil in a mining area. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 353, 120167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Łukowski, A.; Dec, D. Influence of Zn, Cd, and Cu fractions on enzymatic activity of arable soils. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Images of the roots tested for the Cd2+ flux in E. japonicus saplings. (ac) Cd2+ flow test sites in roots; (d) net Cd2+ flux of roots from different treatments; (e) Cd2+ flux of roots from different treatments. For the root Cd2+ fluxes of P. thunbergii saplings, refer to Li et al., 2024 [44]. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Images of the roots tested for the Cd2+ flux in E. japonicus saplings. (ac) Cd2+ flow test sites in roots; (d) net Cd2+ flux of roots from different treatments; (e) Cd2+ flux of roots from different treatments. For the root Cd2+ fluxes of P. thunbergii saplings, refer to Li et al., 2024 [44]. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 15 01141 g001
Figure 2. Cell wall fraction proportion of leaves, stems, and roots proportions from different groups of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus. (a) Root cell wall fraction proportion of P. thunbergii; (b) stem cell wall fraction proportion of P. thunbergii; (c) leaf cell wall fraction proportion of P. thunbergii; (d) root cell wall fraction proportion of E. japonicus; (e) stem cell wall fraction proportion of E. japonicus; (f) leaf cell wall fraction proportion of E. japonicus.
Figure 2. Cell wall fraction proportion of leaves, stems, and roots proportions from different groups of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus. (a) Root cell wall fraction proportion of P. thunbergii; (b) stem cell wall fraction proportion of P. thunbergii; (c) leaf cell wall fraction proportion of P. thunbergii; (d) root cell wall fraction proportion of E. japonicus; (e) stem cell wall fraction proportion of E. japonicus; (f) leaf cell wall fraction proportion of E. japonicus.
Forests 15 01141 g002
Figure 3. NSC content of roots, stems, and leaves from different groups of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus. (ac) NSC content of roots, stems, and leaves from different groups of P. thunbergii; (df) NSC content of roots, stems, and leaves from different groups of E. japonicus. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. NSC content of roots, stems, and leaves from different groups of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus. (ac) NSC content of roots, stems, and leaves from different groups of P. thunbergii; (df) NSC content of roots, stems, and leaves from different groups of E. japonicus. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 15 01141 g003
Figure 4. Xylem hydraulic conductivity, double-wall thickness, and tracheid/vessel lumen diameter in different groups. (a,c,e) Hydraulic conductivity, double-wall thickness, and tracheid lumen diameter in P. thunbergii; (b,d,f) hydraulic conductivity, double-wall thickness, and vessel lumen diameter in E. japonicus. Different lowercase letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Xylem hydraulic conductivity, double-wall thickness, and tracheid/vessel lumen diameter in different groups. (a,c,e) Hydraulic conductivity, double-wall thickness, and tracheid lumen diameter in P. thunbergii; (b,d,f) hydraulic conductivity, double-wall thickness, and vessel lumen diameter in E. japonicus. Different lowercase letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 15 01141 g004aForests 15 01141 g004b
Figure 5. Soil NH4+-N, NO3-N, and AP content and pH in different groups. (ad) Soil NH4+-N, NO3-N, and AP content and pH in P. thunbergii; (eh) soil NH4+-N, NO3-N, and AP content and pH in E. japonicus. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c and d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Soil NH4+-N, NO3-N, and AP content and pH in different groups. (ad) Soil NH4+-N, NO3-N, and AP content and pH in P. thunbergii; (eh) soil NH4+-N, NO3-N, and AP content and pH in E. japonicus. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c and d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 15 01141 g005
Figure 6. Soil microbial communities under different groups. (a) Venn diagram of OTUs in P. thunbergii; (b) Venn diagram of OTUs in E. japonicus; (c) bar chart of microbial distribution at plant soil phylum level, where P, E in the horizontal coordinates represent P. thunbergii and E. japonicus, respectively; (d) bar chart of microbial distribution at plant soil genus level; (eh) alpha diversity index (chao1, Simpson, ACE, Shannon) of P. thunbergii soil samples; (il) alpha diversity index (chao1, Simpson, ACE, Shannon) of E. japonicus soil samples. Different lowercase letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Soil microbial communities under different groups. (a) Venn diagram of OTUs in P. thunbergii; (b) Venn diagram of OTUs in E. japonicus; (c) bar chart of microbial distribution at plant soil phylum level, where P, E in the horizontal coordinates represent P. thunbergii and E. japonicus, respectively; (d) bar chart of microbial distribution at plant soil genus level; (eh) alpha diversity index (chao1, Simpson, ACE, Shannon) of P. thunbergii soil samples; (il) alpha diversity index (chao1, Simpson, ACE, Shannon) of E. japonicus soil samples. Different lowercase letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 15 01141 g006
Figure 7. Soil sucrase activity and soil catalase activity in different groups of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus saplings. (a) Soil sucrase activity in P. thunbergii; (b) soil sucrase activity in E. japonicus; (c) soil catalase activity in P. thunbergii; (d) soil catalase activity in E. japonicus. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d and e) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Soil sucrase activity and soil catalase activity in different groups of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus saplings. (a) Soil sucrase activity in P. thunbergii; (b) soil sucrase activity in E. japonicus; (c) soil catalase activity in P. thunbergii; (d) soil catalase activity in E. japonicus. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d and e) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Forests 15 01141 g007
Table 1. Cd content of leaves, stems, and roots from different groups of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus saplings, different lowercase letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 1. Cd content of leaves, stems, and roots from different groups of P. thunbergii and E. japonicus saplings, different lowercase letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
P. thunbergii E. japonicus
GroupsRootsStemsLeavesRootsStemsLeaves
CK1.23 ± 1.02 c0.27 ± 0.12 b0.29 ± 0.02 b1.76 ± 1.15 c0.21 ± 0.14 b1.22 ± 0.82 a
5018.16 ± 4.08 b1.61 ± 0.36 b0.80 ± 0.58 b6.55 ± 3.68 ab0.66 ± 0.42 b1.73 ± 1.65 a
10042.75 ± 8.42 a12.93 ± 7.94 a9.65 ± 3.42 a8.96 ± 4.00 a3.03 ± 1.81 ab2.83 ± 1.92 a
D1.91 ± 1.24 c0.40 ± 0.19 b0.93 ± 0.86 b0.91 ± 0.79 c0.18 ± 0.02 b0.96 ± 0.38 a
50D22.14 ± 5.00 b2.46 ± 1.64 b1.25 ± 0.11 b3.05 ± 1.73 bc4.20 ± 3.41 a3.07 ± 1.69 a
100D10.75 ± 9.80 bc8.82 ± 2.13 a1.42 ± 0.75 b4.96 ± 2.68 abc3.44 ± 1.20 ab2.43 ± 1.55 a
Table 2. TF and BCF of roots, stems, and leaves in P. thunbergii and E. japonicus saplings from different groups, different lowercase letters (a, b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 2. TF and BCF of roots, stems, and leaves in P. thunbergii and E. japonicus saplings from different groups, different lowercase letters (a, b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
SpeciesParameter5010050D100D
P. thunbergiiTF from roots to stems0.08 ± 0.02 a0.40 ± 0.17 a0.16 ± 0.14 a1.26 ± 0.72 b
TF from stems to leaves0.57 ± 0.42 a0.62 ± 0.08 a0.74 ± 0.04 a0.15 ± 0.04 a
BCF for roots0.27 ± 0.19 ab0.43 ± 0.08 a0.39 ± 0.16 a0.11 ± 0.09 b
BCF for stems0.03 ± 0.01 b0.15 ± 0.05 a0.05 ± 0.03 b0.09 ± 0.02 b
BCF for leaves0.02 ± 0.01 ab0.09 ± 0.03 a0.03 ± 0.02 ab0.01 ± 0.007 b
E. japonicusTF from roots to stems0.14 ± 0.11 a0.56 ± 0.39 a1.37 ± 1.16 a0.97 ± 0.69 a
TF from stems to leaves1.63 ± 0.01 a1.42 ± 1.10 a1.16 ± 0.76 a0.73 ± 0.24 a
BCF for roots0.13 ± 0.07 a0.09 ± 0.04 a0.06 ± 0.03 a0.05 ± 0.03 a
BCF for stems0.01 ± 0.002 a0.03 ± 0.01 a0.08 ± 0.06 a0.03 ± 0.02 a
BCF for leaves0.04 ± 0.01 a0.03 ± 0.01 a0.06 ± 0.03 a0.02 ± 0.01 a
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Wang, J.; Lu, S.; Li, H.; Guo, J. Responses of Physiological Traits and Soil Properties in Pinus thunbergia and Euonymus japonicus Saplings under Drought and Cadmium (Cd) Stress. Forests 2024, 15, 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071141

AMA Style

Li S, Wang J, Lu S, Li H, Guo J. Responses of Physiological Traits and Soil Properties in Pinus thunbergia and Euonymus japonicus Saplings under Drought and Cadmium (Cd) Stress. Forests. 2024; 15(7):1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shan, Jing Wang, Sen Lu, Huan Li, and Junkang Guo. 2024. "Responses of Physiological Traits and Soil Properties in Pinus thunbergia and Euonymus japonicus Saplings under Drought and Cadmium (Cd) Stress" Forests 15, no. 7: 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop