Next Article in Journal
Antibody Responses against Enterovirus Proteases are Potential Markers for an Acute Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Host Range Evolution of Potyviruses: A Global Phylogenetic Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Provides Molecular Insights into the Interaction of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus and Beet soil-borne mosaic virus with Their Host Sugar Beet
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Expression of Potato Expansin A3 (StEXPA3) and Extensin4 (StEXT4) Genes with Distribution of StEXPAs and HRGPs-Extensin Changes as an Effect of Cell Wall Rebuilding in Two Types of PVYNTNSolanum tuberosum Interactions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase NIb of Potyviruses Plays Multifunctional, Contrasting Roles during Viral Infection

1
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture & Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
2
College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
3
London Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 1391 Sandford ST, London, ON N5V 4T3, Canada
4
Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond ST N., London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2020, 12(1), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12010077
Submission received: 29 November 2019 / Revised: 28 December 2019 / Accepted: 3 January 2020 / Published: 8 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Complexity of the Potyviral Interaction Network)

Abstract

:
Potyviruses represent the largest group of known plant RNA viruses and include many agriculturally important viruses, such as Plum pox virus, Soybean mosaic virus, Turnip mosaic virus, and Potato virus Y. Potyviruses adopt polyprotein processing as their genome expression strategy. Among the 11 known viral proteins, the nuclear inclusion protein b (NIb) is the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase responsible for viral genome replication. Beyond its principal role as an RNA replicase, NIb has been shown to play key roles in diverse virus–host interactions. NIb recruits several host proteins into the viral replication complexes (VRCs), which are essential for the formation of functional VRCs for virus multiplication, and interacts with the sumoylation pathway proteins to suppress NPR1-mediated immunity response. On the other hand, NIb serves as a target of selective autophagy as well as an elicitor of effector-triggered immunity, resulting in attenuated virus infection. These contrasting roles of NIb provide an excellent example of the complex co-evolutionary arms race between plant hosts and potyviruses. This review highlights the current knowledge about the multifunctional roles of NIb in potyvirus infection, and discusses future research directions.

1. Introduction

Potyviridae is the largest family of known plant RNA viruses and is comprised of 10 definitive and 3 proposed genera [1,2]. Among them, Potyvirus is the largest genus, including many agriculturally important viruses that cause serious diseases in many crops worldwide [1,2,3]. Example species in Potyvirus include Potato virus Y (PVY), Plum pox virus (PPV), Soybean mosaic virus (SMV), Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV), Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV), Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV), and Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV), 4 of which have been ranked in the 10 most economically or scientifically important plant viruses [4,5]. Because of their importance as pathogens, potyviruses have been relatively more studied than other viruses [3]. In the past two decades, numerous studies have been directed to better understand the molecular plant–virus interactions for the development of novel antiviral strategies.
Potyviruses have a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA genome of approximately 10,000 nucleotides that encodes a long open reading frame (ORF) [1,2,3]. During virus replication, RNA polymerase slippage at the 5′ coding region leads to the generation of small sub-populations of viruses with shorter ORFs [1,2,3,6,7,8,9,10,11]. The large polyprotein is proteolytically processed by three viral proteases, i.e., P1 and helper component proteinase (HC-Pro) (each of which acts in cis on its own C-terminal end), and nuclear inclusion a protease (NIa-Pro), responsible for the remaining cleavage sites, to produce 10 functional proteins: P1, HC-Pro, P3, 6K1, cylindrical inclusion (CI) protein, 6K2, viral genome-linked protein (VPg), NIa-Pro, nuclear inclusion b (NIb), and capsid protein (CP) [1,2,3,6]. The small polyproteins consist of P3N-PIPO for most potyviruses, such as TuMV (Figure 1A), or other small transframe products such as P3N-ALT and P1N-PISPO for a few other potyviruses [7,8,9,10,11]. Potyviral NIb is the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) that is absolutely required for potyviral genome replication [12]. All RNA viruses including potyviruses replicate in the cytoplasm, and the process is catalyzed by the cytoplasmic membrane-bound viral replication complexes (VRCs) [13,14,15]. However, the NIb protein contains nuclear localization signals (NLSs) and has nuclear translocation activity. Consistently, it accumulates predominantly in the nucleus and together with NIa forms amorphous or crystalline nuclear inclusions (NIs) in infected cells [12,16,17,18]. Clustered point mutations within the NLSs of NIb that disrupt its nuclear translocation activity abolish viral genome replication, and this replication defection can be rescued in transgenic cells expressing a functional NIb [12]. Thus, NIb functions in trans and may need other viral-replication-associated proteins and/or host factors to deliver its RdRp activity in the VRC [19]. Like other potyviral proteins such as HC-Pro, CI, VPg, and CP, NIb is also a multifunctional protein [20,21,22,23,24,25].

2. Structural Characterization of NIb

The NIb coding sequence is located between the NIa-Pro cistron and the CP-coding sequence in the genomes of the majority of potyviruses (Figure 1A). The exceptions known so far include Euphorbia ringspot virus (the genus Potyvirus) and Ugandan/cassava brown streak virus (the genus Ipomovirus) in which the NIb is flanked by NIa-Pro and a Maf/HAM1 pyrophosphatase-like sequence [1]. During polyprotein processing, NIb is released by the NIa proteinase, which proteolytically processes peptides with conserved heptapeptide cleavage sites [26]. The minimal substrate length of cleavage site between NIb and CP of Tobacco vein mottling virus is four in the carboxy region and six in the amino region around the scissile bond [27]. In the case of PPV, the cleavage site between NIb and CP may be processed either in cis or in trans by the NIa protein but cleavage between NIa-Pro and NIb occurs in cis only [28,29]. Tobacco etch virus (TEV) also prefers cleavage in trans at the site between NIb and CP and in cis at the site between NIa-Pro and NIb [30]. It is possible that cis processing of the polyprotein at the site between NIa-Pro and NIb is forced by the polyprotein conformation in vivo. The potyviral NIbs have a molecular mass (MM) of nearly 60 kDa. The TuMV NIb contains 517 amino acids with an estimated MM of 59.6 kDa (Figure 1B).
It is well known that RdRp is the only universal viral protein encoded by all RNA viruses, making it an ideal natural target for evolutionary analysis of RNA viruses [31,32]. The viral RdRps are structurally arranged in a classical closed right-hand architecture formed by three subdomains named the palm, thumb, and fingers [33,34,35]. Most of the conservative structural elements of viral RdRps are contained in the palm subdomain, while the fingers and thumb subdomains are quite diverse among different RdRps. The palm subdomain contains five structural conservative motifs (A–E) [34,35]. The GDD sequence motif, which is essential for RdRp activity and is a hallmark of viral RdRps, is located in the C motif. The fingers subdomain includes two conserved motifs, F and G [36]. To the best of our knowledge, none of plant viral RdRps have been structurally characterized. Since plant potyviruses are closely related to animal picornaviruses [31,37], it is reasonable to suggest that the potyviral NIb may adopt similar regulatory mechanisms to the poliovirus RdRp (3Dpol) to deliver its core function. The 3Dpol, conserved among animal picornavirues, is also structurally arranged in a right-hand orientation, and contains seven conserved motifs (A–G)) [38]. Motifs A, B, D, and E are critical for the recognition and binding of nucleoside triphosphates; A and G for the binding of metal ions and the transfer of phosphoryl groups; D for the structural integrity of the palm; E for the binding of the priming nucleotide; and B, F, and G for the binding of the template [38,39,40]. Consistently, seven conserved motifs including SLKAEL (RNA polymerase activity), CVDDFN, CHADGS (RNA-dependent polymerase activity), GDD, [A/S]M[I/V]E[S/A]WG, FTAAP[L/I][D/E], and GNNSGQPSTVVDNTLMV (RNA polymerase activity) are present in the potyviral NIbs (Figure 1B) [41,42,43]. The NIb of the potyvirus TEV, the poliovirus 3Dpol (a picornavirus), and the RdRp of cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV, a comovirus)) share the highest sequence homology in two clusters, (T/S) GXXXTXXXN (T/S) and GDD [44]. Mutants with substitutions affecting the conserved GDD motif or the NIa/NIb cleavage site are lethal in tobacco protoplasts [45]. The relocation of the NIb gene to other intercistronic positions may result in nonviable viruses except when NIb is placed at the amino terminus of the polyprotein or between P1 and HC-Pro [46], suggesting the existence of various restrictions to the organization of the potyviral genome. The self-interaction of NIb has been observed at least for some potyviruses such as SMV and Shallot yellow stripe virus [47]. Additionally, NIb may interact with other potyviral proteins such as NIa-Pro and VPg [47,48]. The RdRp–RdRp self-interaction seems to be a common feature for positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses, including insect-, animal- and human-, and plant-infecting viruses [38,49,50,51,52,53]. The dimerization or oligomerization of RdRps may increase the stability of these enzymes and protect against degradation.

3. NIb is More Than an RdRp in the VRC

As mentioned above, the membrane-bound VRC is responsible for the replication of positive-stranded RNA viruses. The essential components of the VRC include the viral RdRp, replication-associated viral and host proteins, and viral RNA, as well as its associated double-stranded RNA, the replicative form RNA [15,54,55]. The virus-induced VRC-containing membranous vesicles not only provide the scaffold to anchor the VRC but also safeguard double-stranded RNA replication intermediates from RNAi-mediated degradation [15,56]. Many plant and animal viruses remodel the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to form membranous vesicles which accommodate the VRC [57]. For potyvirus replication, it is the viral membrane protein 6K2 or the 6K2-VPg-Pro precursor that induces the formation of the VRC-containing vesicles at the ER exit sites in a COPI- and COPII-dependent manner [14,58,59]. Subsequently, the 6K2-induced vesicles traffic to the Golgi apparatus via COPII vesicles, and then target the periphery of chloroplasts through the actomyosin motility system, suggesting that potyviruses sequentially recruit the ER and chloroplasts for replication [15,60]. Recently, the availability of powerful three-dimensional (3D) imaging technologies such as electron tomography (ET) has made it possible to visualize the membrane structures induced by viruses at an unprecedented high resolution [61,62]. Indeed, an ET-based 3D reconstruction of images of ultrathin sections of TuMV-infected cells revealed that the single-membrane vesicle-like structures (SMVLs) and double-membrane vesicle-like structures (DMVLs) observed previously using regular transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are actual tubules [61]. Further immunoelectron microscopy localized dsRNA and viral-replication-required proteins to the single-membrane vesicle tubules (SMTs), suggesting that the SMTs are the true sites of TuMV replication [61].
In addition to NIb and 6K2, several viral proteins including HC-Pro, P3, CI, and NIa have been shown to be key components of the VRC [54,63,64]. Earlier studies suggested that NIb is likely recruited to the VRC via its interaction with the VPg domain of 6K2-VPg-Pro [12,65,66]. The recruitment of viral RNA to the VRC occurs via the interaction between NIb and the secondary structures at the 3′ untranslated region of the viral RNA [67,68]. Like the members of the family Picornaviridae, potyviruses exclusively employ the protein-primed mechanism of initiation of both minus and plus-strand RNA synthesis. The potyviral VPg is possibly uridylated by NIb by a similar mechanism to the 3Dpol of picornaviruses, and the resulting VPg-oligo-uridylate serves as a primer [69,70].
NIb is probably the most “sticky” among potyviral proteins, as it is a very active recruiter that interacts with many pro-viral host proteins and co-opts them to promote viral infection. Through the interactions with NIb, many of them are recruited to the VRC. A poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) of cucumber was the first host factor identified to interact with the NIb of a potyvirus (Zucchini yellow mosaic virus) [71]. Subsequent studies discovered that PABP2, PABP8, eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), heat shock cognate protein (Hsc or HSP) 70-3, and an RNA helicase-like protein in Arabidopsis (AtRH8) also interact with the potyviral NIb [72,73,74,75,76]. These NIb-interacting host proteins are present in the VRC and are important for viral genome multiplication, although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain to be determined experimentally. It is worth to mention that several of these host proteins are translation-related, suggesting their possible involvement in viral genome translation. Moreover, both eEF1A and Hsc70 are also important components of the VRC of some non-potyviruses [77,78]. Since TuMV translation and replication are tightly coupled within 6K2-induced vesicles [19,54], it has been suggested that some of them may participate in the regulation between potyviral RNA replication and translation [72,75,79]. Recently, we have shown that AtRH9, an RNA helicase from A. thaliana and an α-expansin (NbEXPA1) from Nicotiana benthamiana are two crucial host factors of TuMV [80,81]. The accumulation of TuMV is adversely affected in the AtRH9 knockout or NbEXPA1 knockdown plants. Since both AtRH9 and NbEXPA1 interact with NIb and are present in the VRC, it is possible that such interactions promote viral replication by stimulating NIb’s RdRp activity. In addition, AtRH9, as an RNA helicase, may participate in the separation of RNA duplexes during viral genome replication [80]. NbEXPA1 is a plasmodesmata (PD)-specific cell-wall-loosening protein. The cell-to-cell movement of plant viruses occurs through PD [82]. The NbEXPA1–NIb interaction reduces the accumulation level of NbEXPA1 at PD, which may compromise the canonical function of NbEXPA1 in plant growth and development, leading to activating antiviral defense pathways. Therefore, transient overexpression of NbEXPA1 promotes viral replication and cell-to-cell movement [81].

4. NIb and Sumoylation

In virally infected cells, viral protein function may be modulated by post-translational modifications (PTMs), including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, methylation, and sumoylation [83,84,85]. Sumoylation refers to a highly dynamic, transient, reversible PTM process by which a small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) family of proteins is covalently conjugated to lysine residue(s) of target proteins [86]. Sumoylation may affect the structure, subcellular localization, and enzymatic activity of the target proteins. In TuMV-infected cells, NIb is sumoylated by small ubiquitin-like modifier 3 (SUMO3) via SUMO-conjugating enzyme 1 (SCE1) [87,88]. The SCE1 binds to the central region of NIb to initiate sumoylation [88]. After sumoylation, the distribution of NIb shifts from the nucleus to the cytoplasm where viral replication takes place [87]. These findings suggest that sumoylation regulates the nuclear–cytoplasmic partitioning of NIb. On the other hand, SUMO3 plays a role as an antiviral defender by sumoylation of NONEXPRESSER OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES1 (NPR1) to activate the NPR1 resistance pathway [89]. NPR1 is a master regulator of the plant hormone salicylic acid (SA)-mediated plant immunity [90,91]. In the nucleus, NPR1 activates the expression of PR (PATHOGENESIS-RELATED) genes to promote defense responses [92]. These data suggest that after viral genome translation, NIb targets the nucleus, where it competes against NPR1 for and/or depletes SUMO3 to suppress TuMV-infection-induced, SUMO3-activated-NPR1-mediated immune response [87]. Therefore, in addition to its roles as an RNA polymerase of the VRC and a component recruiter for the VRC, NIb may function as a suppressor of host defense response to promote potyvirus infection.

5. NIb and Autophagy

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved regulated mechanism of all eukaryotic cells that degrades and recycles defective organelles, toxic proteins and macromolecules, and various other aggregates to maintain cellular homeostasis during many biological processes such as development and abiotic and biotic stresses [93,94]. Accumulated evidence suggests that autophagy is involved in viral infection mainly as an antiviral mechanism by degradation of viral particles or viral proteins and/or effectors [95,96]. In a recent study, we showed that Beclin1 (also known as ATG6), a core component of autophagy, interacts specifically with TuMV NIb, and then targets NIb to autophagosomes for degradation [97]. The Beclin1-mediated NIb degradation requires a key autophagic adaptor protein, ATG8a, which interacts with Beclin1 to facilitate the docking of the Beclin1–NIb or Beclin1–NIb–VRC complex to autophagosomes. Interestingly, the overexpression of a truncated Beclin1 mutant that binds to NIb but is unable to mediate NIb degradation also suppresses viral replication, suggesting that Beclin1 can suppress NIb activity independent of Beclin1-mediated autophagy [96]. The interaction was mapped to the GDD motif of NIb. As the GDD motif is conversed among the RdRps of RNA viruses, it is not surprised that Beclin1 also interacts with and suppresses all RNA viruses examined, including three additional potyviruses (TEV, PPV, and SMV) and two nonpotyviruses (Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus of the genus Tobamovirus, and Pepino mosaic virus of the genus Potexvirus) [97].
Besides NIb, another important viral protein, HC-Pro, which is the major potyviral VSR, is also a target of autophagy. In this case, it has been shown that both host proteins rgs-CaM, a calmodulin-like protein, and NBR1, an autophagy cargo receptor, can mediate the degradation of HC-Pro via autophagy to restrict virus infection [96,98]. Moreover, like many animal viruses, potyviruses have evolved some strategies to subvert autophagy to promote their infection [99]. For instance, suppressor of gene silencing 3 (SGS3) and its intimate partner RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6) are two crucial components of RNA silencing. The VPg protein (the second VSR of potyviruses) may interact with SGS3 and mediate the degradation of SGS3 and RDR6 via both ubiquitin and autophagy pathways [100].

6. NIb and Pathogenesis

Among a number of antiviral defense mechanisms deployed by plants to restrict viral infection [101,102,103], the dominant gene (R)-conferred genetic resistance is among the most effective strategies to control viral pathogens for crop production. This type of resistance works based on a well-known gene-for-gene interaction model [104,105]. In brief, a plant-encoded R gene product recognizes a specific viral effector, known as avirulence factor (Avr), to activate effector-triggered immunity (ETI), which confers strong resistance and is often associated with the hypersensitive response (HR) [106,107]. R proteins mostly belong to the nucleotide-binding site–leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) family [108]. In pepper, a potyvirus resistance gene Pvr4 from Criollo de Morelos 334 (CM334) variety confers dominant resistance to six potyviruses, including Pepper mottle virus (PepMoV), Pepper severe mosaic virus (PepSMV), and PVY [109]. The protein encoded by Pvr4 recognizes the NIbs of these potyviruses to trigger this resistance [110,111]. NIb is the avirulence factor for the Pvr4 gene [111,112]. Pvr4 is a coiled-coil (CC) NB-LRR-type protein, and its LRR domain is a crucial region for the recognition of the avirulence effector NIb [112]. The CC domain is responsible for the induction of autoactive cell death in N. benthamiana, but its activity is suppressed by the nucleotide-binding-Apaf1-R protein-CED4 (NBARC) and LRR domain in the absence of NIb [112]. When Pvr4 recognizes NIb, the interaction between NIb and the LRR domain of Pvr4 releases the suppression of the CC domain, thereby activating the cell death response [112]. Therefore, the potyviral NIb functions as an ETI elicitor to inhibit viral infection. Consistent with this, the NIb of the PVY MsNr strain was found to be the elicitor of a veinal necrosis–HR response in a tobacco line carrying the Rk gene, which provides resistance to a root knot nematode [113].
Pvr4 not only confers broad-spectrum resistance to potyviruses but also shows durability under field conditions [110,114]. So far, no PVY strains that can breach Pvr4-conferred resistance in the field have been documented. The evolutionary constraint acting on NIb is considered a major factor influencing the durability of Pvr4 [110]. As NIb is one of the most constrained proteins among potyviruses, amino acid substitution in NIb is likely to induce a high fitness penalty in their natural primary hosts [114,115]. This assumption has been supported by the observation that a single nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution in the NIb cistron of PVY decreases the competitiveness and fitness of the virulent PVY mutant in susceptible pepper plants [110]. In contrast to this, a specific mutation occurring in the NIb of PPV was found to help the virus better adapt to pea, a new host in which the PPV accumulation level increased up to 20 times in comparison with that in peach, a natural host [116]. Thus, the mutation–fitness penalty assumption does not apply to the new hosts. The exact underlying mechanism has not been characterized. We speculate that the increased replication ability in the new hosts may result from the enhanced interaction of the mutated NIb with some host factors. In a recent study, Zhang et al. showed that the wheat yellow mosaic virus NIb interacts with the wheat light-induced protein TaLIP to facilitate viral infection by disruption of the ABA signaling pathway [117]. Taken together, these findings suggest a functional role of NIb as a pathogenesis determinant at least in some potyvirus–host combinations.

7. Conclusions and Future Prospects

In summary, potyviral NIb is a multifunctional protein, and functions as much more than just an RdRp in the viral infection process. It is a recruiter that co-opts proviral host proteins involved in the assembly and activation of the VRC, and a suppressor of host defense response that specifically tackles the NPR1-mediated immunity signaling pathway. Meanwhile, it is also a target of host antiviral defense, e.g., as a substrate of selective autophagy, and furthermore it is an elicitor that activates ETI. NIb’s multifunctionality is attributed to the complex interaction network of NIb, and establishes the significance of NIb in the co-evolutionary arms race between plants and potyviruses. We summarize the diverse functions of NIb in the potyviral infection in Figure 2.
Although extensive studies have been devoted to the characterization of NIb’s roles in potyvirus infection in the past 30 years, much more remains to be explored. To date, we still do not understand clearly how NIb joins other viral proteins and host factors to form the VRC. We still cannot establish an active in vitro viral replicase complex to study potyvirus replication. The availability of this cell-free system would significantly accelerate research on the potyvirus replication mechanism and characterization of the components essential for virus replication. Since RNA viral replication is always associated with cellular membranes [61,62], it would be interesting to conduct high-resolution analyses of the architecture of the membrane structures associated with the potyvirus VRC using advanced ET 3D technology, and investigate the possible role of NIb in remodeling membranous structures and anchoring the VRC to the membrane [62]. It has been suggested that potyviral genome translation and replication are a coupled process [20]. One further important question to be answered is how these two steps are balanced and coordinated to avoid collision, and how the VRC switches from biosynthesis of the negative-strand viral RNA to the plus-strand RNA. Crystallization and cryoelectron microscopy techniques could be used to study the ultramicrostructure of NIb or the NIb complex [23,118,119,120]. These techniques could also be employed to investigate spatial and temporal high-resolution structures of plant viral particles in virally replicating cells [121]. Such studies would certainly help us better understand the structure-based function of NIb and advance the knowledge of how the virus switches from replication to assembly and cell-to-cell movement. In this review, we briefly discussed the involvement of sumoylation in the nuclear-cytoplasmic partitioning of NIb [87]. However, how the SUMO3-sumoylated NIb is transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm is yet to be understood. It remains unclear precisely how potyviruses regulate the distribution of the amounts of NIb in the nuclear and cytoplasm to maximize the benefit for the potyviral replication. The molecular identification of more host factors that interact with NIb, and understanding of mechanistic details of these new host factors as well as those known ones, will improve our understanding of the potyviral infection process and assist in the development of novel effective antiviral strategies for sustainable crop production.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Innovative Research Team of the Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province, China (grant No. 2018CXTD343) and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (grant No. 19CXTD-33) to S.T., and by an A-base grant from AAFC and a discovery grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to A.W.

Acknowledgments

The authors apologize to those colleagues whose relevant work could not be cited owing to space constraints.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cui, H.; Wang, A. The biological impact of the hypervariable N-terminal region of potyvirtal genomes. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2019, 6, 255–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wylie, S.J.; Adams, M.; Chalam, C.; Kreuze, J.; Lopez-Moya, J.J.; Ohshima, K.; Praveen, S.; Rabenstein, F.; Stenger, D.; Wang, A.; et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Potyviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 352–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Revers, F.; Garcia, J.A. Molecular biology of potyviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 2015, 92, 101–199. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Rybicki, E.P. A Top Ten list for economically important plant viruses. Arch. Virol. 2015, 160, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Scholthof, K.B.; Adkins, S.; Czosnek, H.; Palukaitis, P.; Jacquot, E.; Hohn, T.; Hohn, B.; Saunders, K.; Candresse, T.; Ahlquist, P.; et al. Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 12, 938–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adams, M.J.; Antoniw, J.F.; Beaudoin, F. Overview and analysis of the polyprotein cleavage sites in the family Potyviridae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005, 6, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chung, B.Y.; Miller, W.A.; Atkins, J.F.; Firth, A.E. An overlapping essential gene in the Potyviridae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5897–5902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hagiwara-Komoda, Y.; Choi, S.H.; Sato, M.; Atsumi, G.; Abe, J.; Fukuda, J.; Honjo, M.N.; Nagano, A.J.; Komoda, K.; Nakahara, K.S.; et al. Truncated yet functional viral protein produced via RNA polymerase slippage implies underestimated coding capacity of RNA viruses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rodamilans, B.; Valli, A.; Mingot, A.; San Leon, D.; Baulcombe, D.; Lopez-Moya, J.J.; Garcia, J.A. RNA polymerase slippage as a mechanism for the production of frameshift gene products in plant viruses of the potyviridae family. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 6965–6967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mingot, A.; Valli, A.; Rodamilans, B.; San Leon, D.; Baulcombe, D.C.; Garcia, J.A.; Lopez-Moya, J.J. The P1N-PISPO trans-frame gene of sweet potato feathery mottle potyvirus is produced during virus infection and functions as an RNA silencing suppressor. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 3543–3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Olspert, A.; Chung, B.Y.; Atkins, J.F.; Carr, J.P.; Firth, A.E. Transcriptional slippage in the positive-sense RNA virus family Potyviridae. Embo. Rep. 2015, 16, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, X.H.; Valdez, P.; Olvera, R.E.; Carrington, J.C. Functions of the tobacco etch virus RNA polymerase (NIb): Subcellular transport and protein-protein interaction with VPg/proteinase (NIa). J. Virol. 1997, 71, 1598–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Mine, A.; Okuno, T. Composition of plant virus RNA replicase complexes. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2012, 2, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wei, T.; Wang, A. Biogenesis of cytoplasmic membranous vesicles for plant potyvirus replication occurs at endoplasmic reticulum exit sites in a COPI- and COPII-dependent manner. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 12252–12264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Wei, T.; Huang, T.S.; McNeil, J.; Laliberte, J.F.; Hong, J.; Nelson, R.S.; Wang, A. Sequential recruitment of the endoplasmic reticulum and chloroplasts for plant potyvirus replication. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 799–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Martin, M.T.; Gélie, B. Non-structural plum pox potyvirus proteins detected by immunogold labelling. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1997, 103, 427–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Restrepo, M.A.; Freed, D.D.; Carrington, J.C. Nuclear transport of plant potyviral proteins. Plant Cell 1990, 2, 987–998. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ivanov, K.I.; Eskelin, K.; Lohmus, A.; Makinen, K. Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying potyvirus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 1415–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Grangeon, R.; Cotton, S.; Laliberte, J.F. A model for the biogenesis of turnip mosaic virus replication factories. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2010, 3, 363–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deng, P.; Wu, Z.; Wang, A. The multifunctional protein CI of potyviruses plays interlinked and distinct roles in viral genome replication and intercellular movement. Virol. J. 2015, 12, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hasiow-Jaroszewska, B.; Fares, M.A.; Elena, S.F. Molecular evolution of viral multifunctional proteins: The case of potyvirus HC-Pro. J. Mol. Evol. 2014, 78, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Jiang, J.; Laliberte, J.F. The genome-linked protein VPg of plant viruses-a protein with many partners. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2011, 1, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kezar, A.; Kavcic, L.; Polak, M.; Novacek, J.; Gutierrez-Aguirre, I.; Znidaric, M.T.; Coll, A.; Stare, K.; Gruden, K.; Ravnikar, M.; et al. Structural basis for the multitasking nature of the potato virus Y coat protein. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw3808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sorel, M.; Garcia, J.A.; German-Retana, S. The Potyviridae cylindrical inclusion helicase: A key multipartner and multifunctional protein. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 2014, 27, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Valli, A.A.; Gallo, A.; Rodamilans, B.; Lopez-Moya, J.J.; Garcia, J.A. The HCPro from the Potyviridae family: An enviable multitasking Helper Component that every virus would like to have. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 744–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Dougherty, W.G.; Cary, S.M.; Parks, T.D. Molecular genetic analysis of a plant virus polyprotein cleavage site: A model. Virology 1989, 171, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoon, H.Y.; Hwang, D.C.; Choi, K.Y.; Song, B.D. Proteolytic processing of oligopeptides containing the target sequences by the recombinant tobacco vein mottling virus NIa proteinase. Mol. Cells 2000, 10, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garcia, J.A.; Lain, S.; Cervera, M.T.; Riechmann, J.L.; Martin, M.T. Mutational analysis of plum pox potyvirus polyprotein processing by the NIa protease in Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Virol. 1990, 71, 2773–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Garcia, J.A.; Martin, M.T.; Cervera, M.T.; Riechmann, J.L. Proteolytic processing of the plum pox potyvirus polyprotein by the NIa protease at a novel cleavage site. Virology 1992, 188, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carrington, J.C.; Dougherty, W.G. A viral cleavage site cassette: Identification of amino acid sequences required for tobacco etch virus polyprotein processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 3391–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wolf, Y.I.; Kazlauskas, D.; Iranzo, J.; Lucía-Sanz, A.; Kuhn, J.H.; Krupovic, M.; Dolja, V.V.; Koonin, E.V. Origin and evolution of the global RNA virome. mBi 2018, 9, e02329-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. De Farias, S.T.; Dos Santos Junior, A.P.; Rego, T.G.; Jose, M.V. Origin and evolution of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. O’Reilly, E.K.; Kao, C.C. Analysis of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase structure and function as guided by known polymerase structures and computer predictions of secondary structure. Virology 1998, 252, 287–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bruenn, J.A. A structural and primary sequence comparison of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 1821–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ferrer-Orta, C.; Arias, A.; Escarmis, C.; Verdaguer, N. A comparison of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2006, 16, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shatskaya, G.S.; Drutsa, V.L.; Koroleva, O.N.; Osterman, I.A.; Dmitrieva, T.M. Investigation of activity of recombinant mengovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and its mutants. Biochemistry 2013, 78, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Koonin, E.V.; Dolja, V.V.; Krupovic, M. Origins and evolution of viruses of eukaryotes: The ultimate modularity. Virology 2015, 479–480, 2–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ferrer-Orta, C.; Ferrero, D.; Verdaguer, N. RNA-dependent RNA polymerases of picornaviruses: From the structure to regulatory mechanisms. Viruses 2015, 7, 4438–4460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Garriga, D.; Ferrer-Orta, C.; Querol-Audi, J.; Oliva, B.; Verdaguer, N. Role of motif B loop in allosteric regulation of RNA-dependent RNA polymerization activity. J. Mol. Biol. 2013, 425, 2279–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Vives-Adrian, L.; Lujan, C.; Oliva, B.; van der Linden, L.; Selisko, B.; Coutard, B.; Canard, B.; van Kuppeveld, F.J.; Ferrer-Orta, C.; Verdaguer, N. The crystal structure of a cardiovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase reveals an unusual conformation of the polymerase active site. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 5595–5607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Moradi, Z.; Mehrvar, M.; Nazifi, E.; Zakiaghl, M. Iranian johnsongrass mosaic virus: The complete genome sequence, molecular and biological characterization, and comparison of coat protein gene sequences. Virus Genes 2017, 53, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Worrall, E.A.; Hayward, A.C.; Fletcher, S.J.; Mitter, N. Molecular characterization and analysis of conserved potyviral motifs in bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) for RNAi-mediated protection. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zheng, L.; Wayper, P.J.; Gibbs, A.J.; Fourment, M.; Rodoni, B.C.; Gibbs, M.J. Accumulating variation at conserved sites in potyvirus genomes is driven by species discovery and affects degenerate primer design. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Allison, R.; Johnston, R.E.; Dougherty, W.G. The nucleotide sequence of the coding region of tobacco etch virus genomic RNA: Evidence for the synthesis of a single polyprotein. Virology 1986, 154, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, X.H.; Carrington, J.C. Complementation of tobacco etch potyvirus mutants by active RNA polymerase expressed in transgenic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Majer, E.; Salvador, Z.; Zwart, M.P.; Willemsen, A.; Elena, S.F.; Daros, J.A. Relocation of the NIb gene in the tobacco etch potyvirus genome. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 4586–4590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lin, L.; Shi, Y.; Luo, Z.; Lu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Yan, F.; Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Adams, M.J.; Wu, Y. Protein-protein interactions in two potyviruses using the yeast two-hybrid system. Virus Res. 2009, 142, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yambao, M.L.; Masuta, C.; Nakahara, K.; Uyeda, I. The central and C-terminal domains of VPg of Clover yellow vein virus are important for VPg-HCPro and VPg-VPg interactions. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84, 2861–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chinnaswamy, S.; Murali, A.; Li, P.; Fujisaki, K.; Kao, C.C. Regulation of de novo-initiated RNA synthesis in hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by intermolecular interactions. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 5923–5935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hogbom, M.; Jager, K.; Robel, I.; Unge, T.; Rohayem, J. The active form of the norovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is a homodimer with cooperative activity. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kaiser, W.J.; Chaudhry, Y.; Sosnovtsev, S.V.; Goodfellow, I.G. Analysis of protein-protein interactions in the feline calicivirus replication complex. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Luo, G.; Hamatake, R.K.; Mathis, D.M.; Racela, J.; Rigat, K.L.; Lemm, J.; Colonno, R.J. De novo initiation of RNA synthesis by the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (NS5B) of hepatitis C virus. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 851–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Cevik, B. The RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of Citrus tristeza virus forms oligomers. Virology 2013, 447, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cotton, S.; Grangeon, R.; Thivierge, K.; Mathieu, I.; Ide, C.; Wei, T.; Wang, A.; Laliberte, J.F. Turnip mosaic virus RNA replication complex vesicles are mobile, align with microfilaments, and are each derived from a single viral genome. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 10460–10471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Sanfaçon, H. Replication of positive-strand RNA viruses in plants: Contact points between plant and virus components. Can. J. Bot. 2005, 83, 1529–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gonzalez, R.; Wu, B.; Li, X.; Martinez, F.; Elena, S.F. Mutagenesis scanning uncovers evolutionary constraints on tobacco etch potyvirus membrane-associated 6K2 protein. Genome Biol. Evol. 2019, 11, 1207–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Patarroyo, C.; Laliberte, J.F.; Zheng, H. Hijack it, change it: How do plant viruses utilize the host secretory pathway for efficient viral replication and spread? Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Jiang, J.; Patarroyo, C.; Garcia Cabanillas, D.; Zheng, H.; Laliberte, J.F. The vesicle-forming 6K2 protein of turnip mosaic virus interacts with the COPII coatomer Sec24a for viral systemic infection. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 6695–6710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Movahed, N.; Sun, J.; Vali, H.; Laliberte, J.F.; Zheng, H. A host ER fusogen is recruited by turnip mosaic virus for maturation of viral replication vesicles. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wei, T.; Zhang, C.; Hou, X.; Sanfacon, H.; Wang, A. The SNARE protein Syp71 is essential for turnip mosaic virus infection by mediating fusion of virus-induced vesicles with chloroplasts. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wan, J.; Basu, K.; Mui, J.; Vali, H.; Zheng, H.; Laliberte, J.F. Ultrastructural characterization of turnip mosaic virus-induced cellular rearrangements reveals membrane-bound viral particles accumulating in vacuoles. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 12441–12456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Jin, X.; Cao, X.; Wang, X.; Jiang, J.; Wan, J.; Laliberte, J.F.; Zhang, Y. Three-dimensional architecture and biogenesis of membrane structures associated with plant virus replication. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cui, X.; Yaghmaiean, H.; Wu, G.; Wu, X.; Chen, X.; Thorn, G.; Wang, A. The C-terminal region of the Turnip mosaic virus P3 protein is essential for viral infection via targeting P3 to the viral replication complex. Virology 2017, 510, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lohmus, A.; Varjosalo, M.; Makinen, K. Protein composition of 6K2-induced membrane structures formed during Potato virus A infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 943–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Daros, J.A.; Schaad, M.C.; Carrington, J.C. Functional analysis of the interaction between VPg-proteinase (NIa) and RNA polymerase (NIb) of tobacco etch potyvirus, using conditional and suppressor mutants. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 8732–8740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Fellers, J.; Wan, J.; Hong, Y.; Collins, G.B.; Hunt, A.G. In vitro interactions between a potyvirus-encoded, genome-linked protein and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J. Gen. Virol. 1998, 79 Pt 8, 2043–2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Haldeman-Cahill, R.; Daros, J.A.; Carrington, J.C. Secondary structures in the capsid protein coding sequence and 3’ nontranslated region involved in amplification of the tobacco etch virus genome. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 4072–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Makinen, K.; Hafren, A. Intracellular coordination of potyviral RNA functions in infection. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Anindya, R.; Chittori, S.; Savithri, H.S. Tyrosine 66 of Pepper vein banding virus genome-linked protein is uridylylated by RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Virology 2005, 336, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Puustinen, P.; Makinen, K. Uridylylation of the potyvirus VPg by viral replicase NIb correlates with the nucleotide binding capacity of VPg. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 38103–38110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Wang, X.; Ullah, Z.; Grumet, R. Interaction between zucchini yellow mosaic potyvirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and host poly-(A) binding protein. Virology 2000, 275, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Dufresne, P.J.; Thivierge, K.; Cotton, S.; Beauchemin, C.; Ide, C.; Ubalijoro, E.; Laliberte, J.F.; Fortin, M.G. Heat shock 70 protein interaction with Turnip mosaic virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase within virus-induced membrane vesicles. Virology 2008, 374, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Dufresne, P.J.; Ubalijoro, E.; Fortin, M.G.; Laliberte, J.F. Arabidopsis thaliana class II poly(A)-binding proteins are required for efficient multiplication of turnip mosaic virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 2339–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Luan, H.; Shine, M.B.; Cui, X.; Chen, X.; Ma, N.; Kachroo, P.; Zhi, H.; Kachroo, A. The Potyviral P3 protein targets eukaryotic elongation factor 1A to promote the unfolded protein response and viral pathogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Thivierge, K.; Cotton, S.; Dufresne, P.J.; Mathieu, I.; Beauchemin, C.; Ide, C.; Fortin, M.G.; Laliberte, J.F. Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A interacts with Turnip mosaic virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and VPg-Pro in virus-induced vesicles. Virology 2008, 377, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Huang, T.S.; Wei, T.; Laliberté, J.-F.; Wang, A. A host RNA helicase-like protein, AtRH8, interacts with the potyviral genome-linked protein, VPg, associates with the virus accumulation complex, and is essential for infection. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Li, Z.; Pogany, J.; Tupman, S.; Esposito, A.M.; Kinzy, T.G.; Nagy, P.D. Translation elongation factor 1A facilitates the assembly of the tombusvirus replicase and stimulates minus-strand synthesis. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1001175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Mine, A.; Hyodo, K.; Tajima, Y.; Kusumanegara, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kaido, M.; Mise, K.; Taniguchi, H.; Okuno, T. Differential roles of Hsp70 and Hsp90 in the assembly of the replicase complex of a positive-strand RNA plant virus. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 12091–12104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Beauchemin, C.; Boutet, N.; Laliberte, J.F. Visualization of the interaction between the precursors of VPg, the viral protein linked to the genome of turnip mosaic virus, and the translation eukaryotic initiation factor iso 4E in Planta. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Li, Y.; Xiong, R.; Bernards, M.; Wang, A. Recruitment of arabidopsis RNA helicase AtRH9 to the viral replication complex by viral replicase to promote turnip mosaic virus replication. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Park, S.H.; Li, F.; Renaud, J.; Shen, W.; Li, Y.; Guo, L.; Cui, H.; Sumarah, M.; Wang, A. NbEXPA1, an alpha-expansin, is plasmodesmata-specific and a novel host factor for potyviral infection. Plant J. 2017, 92, 846–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Wei, T.; Zhang, C.; Hong, J.; Xiong, R.; Kasschau, K.D.; Zhou, X.; Carrington, J.C.; Wang, A. Formation of complexes at plasmodesmata for potyvirus intercellular movement is mediated by the viral protein P3N-PIPO. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Alcaide-Loridan, C.; Jupin, I. Ubiquitin and plant viruses, let’s play together! Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Wang, A. Dissecting the molecular network of virus-plant interactions: The complex roles of host factors. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2015, 53, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cheng, X.; Wang, A. Multifaceted defense and counter-defense in co-evolutionary arms race between plants and viruses. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2017, 10, e1341025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Wilkinson, K.A.; Henley, J.M. Mechanisms, regulation and consequences of protein SUMOylation. Biochem. J. 2010, 428, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Cheng, X.; Xiong, R.; Li, Y.; Li, F.; Zhou, X.; Wang, A. Sumoylation of turnip mosaic virus RNA polymerase promotes viral infection by counteracting the host NPR1-mediated immune response. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 508–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Xiong, R.; Wang, A. SCE1, the SUMO-conjugating enzyme in plants that interacts with NIb, the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of Turnip mosaic virus, is required for viral infection. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 4704–4715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Saleh, A.; Withers, J.; Mohan, R.; Marques, J.; Gu, Y.; Yan, S.; Zavaliev, R.; Nomoto, M.; Tada, Y.; Dong, X. Posttranslational modifications of the master transcriptional regulator NPR1 enable dynamic but tight control of plant immune responses. Cell Host Microbe. 2015, 18, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Sun, Y.; Detchemendy, T.W.; Pajerowska-Mukhtar, K.M.; Mukhtar, M.S. NPR1 in JazzSet with pathogen effectors. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Chu, J.Y.; Boyle, P.; Wang, Y.; Brindle, I.D.; De Luca, V.; Despres, C. The Arabidopsis NPR1 protein is a receptor for the plant defense hormone salicylic acid. Cell Rep. 2012, 1, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Chen, J.; Mohan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Chen, H.; Palmer, I.A.; Chang, M.; Qi, G.; Spoel, S.H.; Mengiste, T.; et al. NPR1 promotes its own and target gene expression in plant defense by recruiting CDK8. Plant Physiol. 2019, 181, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Tang, J.; Bassham, D.C. Autophagy in crop plants: what’s new beyond Arabidopsis? Open Biol. 2018, 8, 180162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Wang, P.; Mugume, Y.; Bassham, D.C. New advances in autophagy in plants: Regulation, selectivity and function. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 80, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Haxim, Y.; Ismayil, A.; Jia, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Chen, T.; Qian, L.; Liu, N.; Wang, Y.; Han, S.; et al. Autophagy functions as an antiviral mechanism against geminiviruses in plants. Elife 2017, 6, e23897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Nakahara, K.S.; Masuta, C.; Yamada, S.; Shimura, H.; Kashihara, Y.; Wada, T.S.; Meguro, A.; Goto, K.; Tadamura, K.; Sueda, K.; et al. Tobacco calmodulin-like protein provides secondary defense by binding to and directing degradation of virus RNA silencing suppressors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 10113–10118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Li, F.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.; Hou, X.; Zhou, X.; Wang, A. Beclin1 restricts RNA virus infection in plants through suppression and degradation of the viral polymerase. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hafren, A.; Ustun, S.; Hochmuth, A.; Svenning, S.; Johansen, T.; Hofius, D. Turnip mosaic virus counteracts selective autophagy of the viral silencing suppressor HCpro. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 649–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Kushwaha, N.K.; Hafren, A.; Hofius, D. Autophagy-virus interplay in plants: From antiviral recognition to proviral manipulation. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 1211–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Cheng, X.; Wang, A. The potyvirus silencing suppressor protein VPg mediates degradation of SGS3 via ubiquitination and autophagy pathways. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01478-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Calil, I.P.; Fontes, E.P.B. Plant immunity against viruses: Antiviral immune receptors in focus. Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Paudel, D.B.; Sanfacon, H. Exploring the diversity of mechanisms associated with plant tolerance to virus infection. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Wu, X.; Valli, A.; Garcia, J.A.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, X. The tug-of-war between plants and viruses: Great progress and many remaining questions. Viruses 2019, 11, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Dangl, J.L.; Jones, J.D. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 2001, 411, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Flor, H.H. Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1971, 9, 275–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. De Ronde, D.; Butterbach, P.; Kormelink, R. Dominant resistance against plant viruses. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Gouveia, B.C.; Calil, I.P.; Machado, J.P.; Santos, A.A.; Fontes, E.P. Immune receptors and co-receptors in antiviral innate immunity in plants. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Maule, A.J.; Caranta, C.; Boulton, M.I. Sources of natural resistance to plant viruses: Status and prospects. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 8, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Janzac, B.F.; Fabre, M.F.; Palloix, A.; Moury, B. Phenotype and spectrum of action of the Pvr4 resistance in pepper against potyviruses, and selection for virulent variants. Plant Pathol. 2009, 58, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Janzac, B.; Montarry, J.; Palloix, A.; Navaud, O.; Moury, B. A point mutation in the polymerase of Potato virus Y confers virulence toward the Pvr4 resistance of pepper and a high competitiveness cost in susceptible cultivar. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 2010, 23, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Kim, S.B.; Lee, H.Y.; Seo, S.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, D. RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (NIb) of the potyviruses is an avirulence factor for the broad-spectrum resistance gene Pvr4 in Capsicum annuum cv. CM334. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Kim, S.B.; Lee, H.Y.; Choi, E.H.; Park, E.; Kim, J.H.; Moon, K.B.; Kim, H.S.; Choi, D. The coiled-coil and leucine-rich repeat domain of the potyvirus resistance protein Pvr4 has a distinct role in signaling and pathogen recognition. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2018, 31, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Fellers, J.P.; Tremblay, D.; Handest, M.F.; Lommel, S.A. The Potato virusd Y MSNR NIb-replicase is the elicitor of a veinal necrosis-hypersensitive response in root knot nematode resistant tobacco. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Janzac, B.; Fabre, F.; Palloix, A.; Moury, B. Constraints on evolution of virus avirulence factors predict the durability of corresponding plant resistances. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009, 10, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Moury, B.; Desbiez, C.; Jacquemond, M.; Lecoq, H. Genetic diversity of plant virus populations: Towards hypothesis testing in molecular epidemiology. Adv. Virus Res. 2006, 67, 49–87. [Google Scholar]
  116. Wallis, C.M.; Stone, A.L.; Sherman, D.J.; Damsteegt, V.D.; Gildow, F.E.; Schneider, W.L. Adaption of plum pox virus to be a herbaceous host (Pisum sativum) following serial passages. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 2839–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, T.; Liu, P.; Zhong, K.; Zhang, F.; Xu, M.; He, L.; Jin, P.; Chen, J.; Yang, J. Wheat yello mosaic virus NIb interacting with host light induced protein (LIP) facilitates its infection through perturbing the abscisic acid pathway in wheat. Biology 2019, 8, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Zhang, Y.; Cao, X.; Li, D. Architecture of viral replication factories. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 30439–30440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Guo, Y.; Liu, B.; Ding, Z.; Li, G.; Liu, M.; Zhu, D.; Sun, Y.; Dong, S.; Lou, Z. Distinct mechanism for the formation of the ribonucleoprotein complex of tomato spotted wilt virus. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e00892-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Komoda, K.; Narita, M.; Yamashita, K.; Tanaka, I.; Yao, M. Asymmetric trimeric ring structure of the nucleocapsid protein of Tospovirus. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01002–e01017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Huynh, N.T.; Hesketh, E.L.; Saxena, P.; Meshcheriakova, Y.; Ku, Y.C.; Hoang, L.T.; Johnson, J.E.; Ranson, N.A.; Lomonossoff, G.P.; Reddy, V.S. Crystal structure and proteomics analysis of empty virus-like particles of Cowpea mosaic virus. Structure 2016, 24, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) genome and the predicted structure of the TuMV nuclear inclusion b (NIb). (A) Schematic representation of the TuMV genome. The circle represents the genome-linked viral protein VPg, and (A)n represents the poly(A) tail. The open reading frame (ORF) is indicated as a long box. Mature proteins resulting from polyprotein processing are indicated by smaller boxes. PIPO derived from a frameshift on the P3 cistron is indicated as a grey box. P1 and HC-Pro release themselves by auto-proteolytic cleavage at their own C-termini. Other cleavages are processed by NIaPro. The mature proteins include coat protein (CP), nuclear inclusion b (NIb), which is the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), and two viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs), HC-Pro and VPg. For clarity, the relative sizes of the mature proteins are not drawn to scale. (B) Schematic representation of TuMV NIb showing the predicted locations of RdRp signature motifs A to G. The locations of motifs A to G was determined by protein sequence alignment of TuMV NIb and RHDV RdRp. NLSs, the GDD motif, and the SCE1 binding domain are indicated. (C) Ribbon diagram of TuMV NIb predicted by the I-TASSER server. The TuMV NIb protein (NP_734221.1) sequence was submitted to the I-TASSER server for 3D structure prediction and the Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) RdRp (PDB ID:1KHV) was identified as the most homologous protein in the PDB library. The typical RdRp fingers, palm, and thumb domains are colored cyan, magenta, and green, respectively, and the N-terminal domain is colored red. The RdRp active site is colored orange.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) genome and the predicted structure of the TuMV nuclear inclusion b (NIb). (A) Schematic representation of the TuMV genome. The circle represents the genome-linked viral protein VPg, and (A)n represents the poly(A) tail. The open reading frame (ORF) is indicated as a long box. Mature proteins resulting from polyprotein processing are indicated by smaller boxes. PIPO derived from a frameshift on the P3 cistron is indicated as a grey box. P1 and HC-Pro release themselves by auto-proteolytic cleavage at their own C-termini. Other cleavages are processed by NIaPro. The mature proteins include coat protein (CP), nuclear inclusion b (NIb), which is the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), and two viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs), HC-Pro and VPg. For clarity, the relative sizes of the mature proteins are not drawn to scale. (B) Schematic representation of TuMV NIb showing the predicted locations of RdRp signature motifs A to G. The locations of motifs A to G was determined by protein sequence alignment of TuMV NIb and RHDV RdRp. NLSs, the GDD motif, and the SCE1 binding domain are indicated. (C) Ribbon diagram of TuMV NIb predicted by the I-TASSER server. The TuMV NIb protein (NP_734221.1) sequence was submitted to the I-TASSER server for 3D structure prediction and the Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) RdRp (PDB ID:1KHV) was identified as the most homologous protein in the PDB library. The typical RdRp fingers, palm, and thumb domains are colored cyan, magenta, and green, respectively, and the N-terminal domain is colored red. The RdRp active site is colored orange.
Viruses 12 00077 g001
Figure 2. NIb plays contrasting roles in potyvirus infection. After entry into host plant cells, a potyvirus virion undergoes disassembly of viral particles and viral genome translation to produce viral proteins required for replication. The 6K2 or its precursor remodels the ER to form the VRC-containing vesicles at ER exit sites for potyvirus genome replication. The 6K2-induced vesicles may subsequently target chloroplasts for robust viral replication. NIb is recruited to the VRC, likely via its interaction with VPg domain of 6K2-VPg-Pro. NIb recruits many host factors such as poly(A)-binding protein (PABP), eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), heat shock cognate 70-3 (Hsc70-3), A. thaliana RNA helicase AtRH9, and N. benthamiana α-expansin (NbEXPA1). Potyvirus infection activates autophagy in plants and Beclin1 (ATG6) interacts with NIb to directly inhibit NIb activity or mediate autophagic degradation of NIb to restrict virus infection. Beclin1-mediated NIb degradation requires a key autophagic adaptor protein, ATG8a, which targets to Beclin1 to facilitate the docking of the Beclin1–NIb or Beclin1–NIb–VRC complex to autophagosomes. NIb may also act as an avirulence factor to activate ETI by recognition of resistance gene R-encoded proteins such as Pvr4. In addition, the nuclear-localized NIb is sumoylated by SUMO3. The sumoylation of NIb promotes potyvirus infection by relocalization of NIb from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and inhibition of the SUMO3-activated-NPR1-mediated resistance pathway.
Figure 2. NIb plays contrasting roles in potyvirus infection. After entry into host plant cells, a potyvirus virion undergoes disassembly of viral particles and viral genome translation to produce viral proteins required for replication. The 6K2 or its precursor remodels the ER to form the VRC-containing vesicles at ER exit sites for potyvirus genome replication. The 6K2-induced vesicles may subsequently target chloroplasts for robust viral replication. NIb is recruited to the VRC, likely via its interaction with VPg domain of 6K2-VPg-Pro. NIb recruits many host factors such as poly(A)-binding protein (PABP), eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), heat shock cognate 70-3 (Hsc70-3), A. thaliana RNA helicase AtRH9, and N. benthamiana α-expansin (NbEXPA1). Potyvirus infection activates autophagy in plants and Beclin1 (ATG6) interacts with NIb to directly inhibit NIb activity or mediate autophagic degradation of NIb to restrict virus infection. Beclin1-mediated NIb degradation requires a key autophagic adaptor protein, ATG8a, which targets to Beclin1 to facilitate the docking of the Beclin1–NIb or Beclin1–NIb–VRC complex to autophagosomes. NIb may also act as an avirulence factor to activate ETI by recognition of resistance gene R-encoded proteins such as Pvr4. In addition, the nuclear-localized NIb is sumoylated by SUMO3. The sumoylation of NIb promotes potyvirus infection by relocalization of NIb from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and inhibition of the SUMO3-activated-NPR1-mediated resistance pathway.
Viruses 12 00077 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shen, W.; Shi, Y.; Dai, Z.; Wang, A. The RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase NIb of Potyviruses Plays Multifunctional, Contrasting Roles during Viral Infection. Viruses 2020, 12, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12010077

AMA Style

Shen W, Shi Y, Dai Z, Wang A. The RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase NIb of Potyviruses Plays Multifunctional, Contrasting Roles during Viral Infection. Viruses. 2020; 12(1):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12010077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shen, Wentao, Yan Shi, Zhaoji Dai, and Aiming Wang. 2020. "The RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase NIb of Potyviruses Plays Multifunctional, Contrasting Roles during Viral Infection" Viruses 12, no. 1: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12010077

APA Style

Shen, W., Shi, Y., Dai, Z., & Wang, A. (2020). The RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase NIb of Potyviruses Plays Multifunctional, Contrasting Roles during Viral Infection. Viruses, 12(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12010077

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop