Next Article in Journal
High Individual Heterogeneity of Neutralizing Activities against the Original Strain and Nine Different Variants of SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Characterization of a Novel Epitope of ASFV-Encoded dUTPase by Monoclonal Antibodies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/v13112176
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Characterization of Circular Single-Stranded DNA Genomes in Sheep and Goat Milk

by
Marie-Thérèse König
1,
Robert Fux
2,
Ellen Link
2,
Gerd Sutter
2,
Erwin Märtlbauer
1 and
Andrea Didier
1,*
1
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Food Safety, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 85764 München, Germany
2
Chair of Virology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80539 München, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(11), 2176; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112176
Submission received: 7 October 2021 / Revised: 26 October 2021 / Accepted: 27 October 2021 / Published: 28 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In recent years, a variety of circular replicase-encoding single-stranded (CRESS) DNA viruses and unclassified virus-like DNA elements have been discovered in a broad range of animal species and environmental samples. Key questions to be answered concern their presence in the human diet and their potential impact on disease emergence. Especially DNA elements termed bovine meat and milk factors (BMMF) are suspected to act as co-factors in the development of colon and breast cancer. To expand our knowledge on the occurrence of these potential pathogens in human nutrition, a total of 73 sheep and 40 goat milk samples were assayed by combining rolling circle amplification (RCA), PCR and Sanger sequencing. The present study further includes retail milk from the aforementioned species. We recovered 15 single stranded (ss) circular genomes. Of those, nine belong to the family Genomoviridae and six are members of the unclassified group of BMMF. Thus, dairy sheep and goats add to dispersal of CRESS viruses and circular ssDNA elements, which enter the food chain via milk. The presence of these entities is therefore more widespread in Bovidae than initially assumed and seems to be part of the common human nutrition.

1. Introduction

In recent years, a considerable number of small circular replicase-encoding single stranded DNA (CRESS) viruses [1,2,3] and unclassified virus-like DNA molecules [4,5,6] have been recovered from numerous animal species as well as from environmental samples. The Cressdnaviricota encompassing eight families represent a novel, rapidly growing phylum of these DNA viruses [7]. One of them—the Genomoviridae—comprises 10 genera isolated from all domains of live as well as from environmental samples [8]. The number of species within this family steadily increases and there are numerous uncultivated isolates in the databases, which are still unclassified. Their genomes are approximately 2–2.4 kb in length and encode at least two proteins, which are: (i) a rolling circle replication initiation protein (Rep) and (ii) a capsid protein (CP). Pairwise comparison of CP sequences revealed a higher degree of divergence compared to Rep. Assignment to a genus is therefore mainly based on the amino acid (aa) sequence of Rep [9]. These Rep proteins initiate rolling circle replication (RCR) of the viral genomes [10]. In addition to studies focussing on the molecular mechanism of replication, some studies describe the occurrence of circular single stranded (ss) DNAs in livestock and foods of animal origin. Investigations from China reported on the characterization of CRESS viral genomes from the genital tract and blood of cattle [11,12]. Viral genomes and CRESS DNAs have been found in various meat samples in Porto Alegre, Brazil and in San Francisco, USA. However, in these reports the detection was not linked to human diseases [13,14]. In contrast, multiple unclassified circular viral-like DNA elements, isolated from raw milk and cow milk at retail in Germany are suspected to contribute to the emergence of colon and breast cancer and neurodegenerative diseases [5,15,16,17]. These DNAs have been termed “BMMF” (bovine meat and milk factors) and are currently assigned to BMMF groups 1–4 according to their molecular characteristics [15]. Often a certain strain is synonymously described by abbreviations like HCBI (healthy cattle blood isolate) and CMI (cow milk isolate) thus pointing to the matrix from which it has been originally isolated. The majority of isolates is assorted to BMMF group 1 and 2, showing similarities to Sphinx 1.76 and Sphinx 2.36 DNA initially described by Manuelidis [4]. A few recovered isolates have been identified as genomoviruses and were assigned to BMMF group 3. Group 4 embodies a single isolate exhibiting similarities to a Psychrobacter sp. plasmid. BMMF group 1 and 2 members lack a CP and therefore differ significantly from group 3. All BMMF contain rep-genes and apparently replicate via RCR. In addition to a potential hairpin structure as a putative origin of replication, all BMMF1 genomes feature tandem repeats (TR) in proximity to rep [17]. These attributes underpin the theory on the phylogeny of circular ssDNAs, which are supposed to have evolved from bacterial plasmids via RNA virus gene transfer [18,19]. Therefore, borders between CRESS viruses, plasmids and phages sometimes blur.
From a disease related point of view, latest studies demonstrated the presence of BMMF encoded antigens in colorectal peritumor and tumor tissue and therefore support the idea of their involvement in colorectal cancerogenesis [20]. Thus far, the isolation of Cressdnaviricota and BMMF has been reported from meat, milk and dairy products of “taurine” cattle descending from the European aurochs. Despite the potential correlation between these DNAs and human cancer [21,22,23], data from other Bovidae are still missing. Beside “taurine” cattle, “zebuine” cattle, water buffaloes and small ruminants contribute to the worldwide milk supply [24]. In a recently published study, we showed the occurrence of circular ssDNA and a gemycircularvirus in water buffalo milk [25]. Data from studies focussing on domestic livestock are scarce and display a still narrow basis for a risk assessment concerning potential adverse effects on human health.
The present study highlights the recovery and characterization of circular DNA genomes in sheep and goat milk, thereby demonstrating a considerably more frequent occurrence of genomoviruses and BMMF in milk of dairy Bovidae than assumed so far.

2. Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A total of 113 samples of sheep and goat milk were collected from eight different flocks in Germany. Five different sheep farmers contributed altogether 73 samples (flock A: n = 20, flock B: n = 15, flock C: n = 15, flock D: n = 3, flock E: n = 20) and three goat farmers added 40 further milk samples to the study (flock F: n = 4, flock G: n = 20, flock H: n = 16). Animals were kept in Hesse, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Baden-Württemberg and Bavaria. After collection, that was carried out during the daily milking routine, the milk was cooled to 4 °C and cold-shipped to the Institute of Food Safety within 48 h. Additionally, commercially available sheep milk (n = 6) and goat milk (n = 6) produced in Germany, Austria and Spain was bought in German supermarkets.

2.2. DNA Extraction and RCA

DNA was extracted from 200 µL milk using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration and purity (i.e. OD260/OD280 ratio) were determined on a DeNovix DS-11 FX (DeNovix, Wilmington, DE, USA) spectrophotometer. Rolling circle amplification (RCA) of approx. 40 ng DNA was performed by the TempliPhi Amplification Kit (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) with random primers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Isothermal amplification time at 30 °C was set to 18 h.

2.3. Recovery of Viral-like DNA Elements

Initial screening of RCA products for the presence of Sphinx-like DNA included three primer pairs designed via the rep-gene of Sphinx 1.76 (GenBank Acc. No. HQ444404.1; accessed in September 2021) and one designed via the rep-gene of Sphinx 2.36 (GenBank Acc. No. HQ444405.1; accessed in September 2021). A similar approach included 13 primer pairs for detection of genomoviruses. All PCRs were run in a volume of 50 µL on a TProfessional Gradient 96 Thermocycler (Biometra, Jena, Germany). ThermoPrime Plus Polymerase (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 3 U/reaction was applied. The final concentration of dNTPs (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA) of 200 µM each. Primer sequences as well as the individual amplification programs are summarized in Supplementary Table S1 (sheets 1 + 2). PCR products were purified from agarose gels with HighYield PCR Purification/Gel Extraction Kit (SLG, Südlaborbedarf, Gauting, Germany) and subjected to Sanger sequencing on both strands. MWG Eurofins (Ebersberg, Germany) operated all sequencing reactions performed in the present study. PCR screening sequencing results were used for inversed primer design to obtain full-length sequences of the circular DNA elements (Supplementary Table S1, sheet 3). Additional PCRs including abutting primers for amplification of BMMF2 sequences published by de Villiers et al. [15] and for BMMF1 sequences published by Whitley et al. [16] were carried out.

2.4. Cloning and Full-Length Sequencing

Inverse, gel-purified PCR products were ligated with pCR2.1-TopoTA vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Afterwards, chemically competent Escherichia coli DH5 alpha were transformed and the resulting pellet was plated on LB-agar with ampicillin (100 µg/mL). Five clones from each plate were subjected to MiniPrep Plasmid isolation via GenElute Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Sigma Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). After control digest of 500 ng plasmid DNA with EcoRI (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) insert-bearing clones were sequenced via the M13rev-29 and M13uni-21 primer binding sites present in the vector.

2.5. Data Analysis

All full-length sequences were subjected to BlastSearch against the nucleotide database at NCBI [26]. Multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees were computed in MEGA software (v. 10.2.6) by the means of the Maximum likelihood method. Bootstrap values were computed with 500 replicates [27]. SDT v1.2 was utilised for displaying pairwise genome identity scores of novel genomoviruses calculated from pairwise alignments generated by MUSCLE [28]. Tandem repeats [29] and inverted repeats [30] upstream the rep-gene sequences were checked at Emboss explorer. Maximum size of tandem repeats was restricted to 30 nucleotides (nt) and the minimum size of inverted repeats was set to 4 nt. ORFfinder software (version 1.3.0) at NCBI [31] served for in silico detection of potential open reading frames. Illustrations were plotted with SeqBuilder Pro of the DNASTAR software (Lasergene Inc., v. 17.1. DNASTAR. Madison, WI, USA) [32]. ATG or TTG as alternative start codons were allowed. The minimum ORF size was limited to 75 amino acids (aa). Only ORFs ≥ 95 aa were included in further comparative and functional analyisis. Putative intron acceptor-/donor sites and conserved amino acid motifs were identified manually. All annotated genomes from this study were deposited in the GenBank database (Accession numbers OK148616-OK148630).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. General Data Analysis and Interpretation

The present study aimed to detect and characterize circular single stranded DNAs (CRESS viruses and BMMF) in sheep and goat milk, thus expanding the current knowledge on the occurrence of these factors in animal-based foods. To cover this topic, individual milk samples from flocks kept in different German provinces as well as milk available at retail were assayed. Grocery milk packages originate from Germany, Austria and Spain. Table 1 summarizes the overall information on the origin and basic features of circular DNA elements detected.
Circular ssDNA elements that were detected in individual milk samples originated from two out of five sheep flocks. In flock B, 40% (6/15) of the sheep milk samples contained circular full-length sequences with one animal bearing two different sequences. In contrast, flock C comprised 13% (2/15) positive individual samples only. Results obtained from sheep and goat milk on the flock level thus markedly differ from the recently published data on water buffalo milk: (i) both water buffalo herds under study were affected and (ii) 56% of the animals from herd 1 and 42% from herd 2 tested positive for full-length sequences [25]. Although three out of 40 individual goat milk samples yielded amplicons of the expected size and sequence with at least one primer pair during PCR screening, we failed to retrieve full-length circular genomes from any of them. This discrepancy has already been observed when water buffalo milk was assayed [25] and again underlines the importance not to rely on the presence of sub-genomic amplicons to categorize an individual as positive. In contrast to the individual samples from the goat farms, four full-length genomes were recovered from goat milk at retail (GmGV9; GmI2, GmI5 and GmI6).
Overall, 50% of sheep and goat milk at retail contained either full-length CRESS-DNA or BMMF-like DNA. Interestingly, goat milk at retail tested positive although none of the individual samples under study contained circular ssDNA elements. Unfortunately, milk at the grocery cannot be traced back to the delivering farms especially those brands produced in Austria and Spain. To interpret this outcome, one has to keep in mind that due to blending at the dairy plant a milk package available at retail contains bulk milk from numerous individuals kept on different farms. Although the number of herds and animals assayed herein is far too low for a comprehensive prevalence estimation, a precautious interpretation of results could read as follows: There are positive and negative herds of sheep and goats kept in Germany. The percentage of affected animals in a positive herd is low to medium. Processing at the dairy plant leads to a medium percentage of packages positive for ssDNA elements at retail.
Furthermore, one has to consider that individual milk samples from the farms have been assayed as raw milk, whereas milk at retail has been pasteurized. As both sample types enabled the recovery of full-length ssDNA heat treatment at the dairy plant does not seem to negatively affect the isolation and detection procedure. Plenty other studies demonstrated the occurrence of CRESS-DNA in various samples like e.g., blood, feces, insects and plant material. Thus, a low-level contamination of milk with those entities cannot be fully excluded. Furthermore, one has to keep in mind, that all full-length genomes were recovered after RCA of input DNA. Thus, we assume that the “viral load” is rather low. A classical qPCR approach to determine viral copy number is questionable, because qPCR is based on the amplification of sub-genomic amplicons. In the present study, we occasionally faced diverging results after PCR screening and full-length amplification due to unknown reasons. Thus, a quantification of the sub-genomic fragments might be misleading. Future studies would benefit from a coherent definition of “BMMF/genomovirus positive” individuals and samples.
With regard to the cancer hypothesis one has to keep in mind that sheep and goats have a considerable impact on human nutrition worldwide [33,34]. Remarkably, small ruminants play a significant role in some Asian and African countries [35], like for example India, West and Central Africa, where we observe low colorectal cancer incidences [36].

3.2. Characterization of Genomoviral Sequences

In the present study, nine genomoviral sequences, eight from individual sheep milk samples and one from goat milk at retail, were detected. The isolates were termed sheep milk genomovirus 1–8 (SmGV1–8) and goat milk genomovirus 9 (GmGV9). Their length ranged from 2122 to 2192 nt. BlastSearch hits assigned the sequences to the family Genomoviridae (Supplementary Table S2, sheet 1). A genome-wide pairwise similarity comparison of the isolates from this study with representatives from nine genomoviral genera listed by the International Committee for Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) was performed to classify SmGV1–GmGV9 (Figure 1A). By setting the species demarcation threshold to 78% according to the suggestions given by Varsani and Krupovic in 2017 [9] the isolates SmGV1–5 and SmGV7 represent variants of the ICTV assigned species “Gemykrogvirus carib1” (KJ938717) isolated from caribou feces with 88% genome pairwise identity. These six isolates show >99% similarity among each other thus representing one strain. Isolate GmGV9 also fits the genus Gemykrogvirus. The highest sequence similarity (95%) is given to “Gemykrogvirus bovas1” (LK931484) which has been detected in taurine cattle serum. With 82% pairwise similarity, isolates SmGV6 and SmGV8 are variants of the species “Gemykibivirus humas3” (KP987887) and therefore belong to the genus Gemykibivirus. In order to obtain a depiction of results better comparable to the later presented BMMF isolates, a phylogenetic tree was calculated based on representative sequences from nine genomoviral genera and genomoviral sequences from this study (Figure 2).
In summary, seven out of nine genomoviral isolates under study cluster within species of the genus Gemykrogvirus, while the remaining two genomes belong to a species of genus Gemykibivirus. According to the similarity calculations and the prerequisites given by Varsani and Krupovic in 2017 [9], none of our isolates represents a novel species.
All isolates identified in this study exhibit typical features of Genomoviridae family members upon in silico analysis (Figure 1B). Beside a potential stem-loop structure at the origin of replication with a conserved nonanucleotide motif (TAATATTAT) at the loop-tip [39,40,41,42] genomes encode a Rep protein in complementary sense direction separated by a putative intron. These intron sequences have firstly been described in plant-infecting geminiviruses [43]. Like diverse ssDNA viruses, bacterial plasmids and phages, CRESS DNA viruses replicate through rolling circle replication (RCR) [44,45]. This mechanism is initiated by the Rep protein containing a distinct RCR endonuclease domain and a superfamily 3 (SF3) helicase domain [46]. Genomoviral Reps contain characteristic motifs associated with the endonuclease and helicase function. These motifs slightly differ between genera [9]. All conserved motifs identified in the new isolates are summarized in Table 2 and the variation in the amino acid motifs of all gemykibivirus- and gemykrogvirus-isolates including the ICTV-listed ones is illustrated in Figure 3. In addition to the genome-wide sequence comparison, amino acid motifs confirm the assignment of SmGV1–5, SmGV7 and SmGV9 to the genus Gemykrogvirus and SmGV6 and 8 to the genus Gemykibivirus. RCR motif I is thought to represent an essential part for recognition of the origin of replication and is located at the N-terminus of the Rep. RCR Motif II comprises two histidines ‘u-His-Tyr-His-u’ potentially coordinating metal ions that function as cofactors for endonuclease activity (u denotes hydrophobic residues). The third RCA motif seems to play an important role in dsDNA cleavage, covalent attachment of Rep and positioning during catalysis. GRS motifs separating motifs II and III have been identified for the first time in members of the family Geminiviridae by Nash et al. [47]. Their presence in isolates from this study indicates an involvement in the replication mechanism of genomoviruses. Furthermore all nine isolates exhibit typical SF3 helicase motifs (Walker A, B and C), which are necessary for dsDNA intermediate unwinding [48,49]. Interestingly, isolate SmGV2 contains a modified Walker C motif were a neutral amino acid (N) is replaced by an acidic one (D). Whether this substitution has a functional influence on the helicase activity has to be assayed. However, according to Varsani and Krupovic, 2017 [9] an acidic amino acid at the end of Walker C does not occur in any other genomoviral sequence.
In addition to the species assignment based on a genome-wide comparison, a further approach is based on the analysis of the Rep amino acid sequences. Results might slightly differ from whole genome analysis because of intra-familiar recombination [51]. In terms of the sequences retrieved herein, Rep comparison did not differ from the genome-wide assessment and thus did not hint to recombination events (Supplementary Figure S1A). Genomoviruses further encode CPs, which in general exhibit higher sequence divergence than Reps. This divergence can be seen in a similarity score matrix based on amino acid sequences of CPs (Supplementary Figure S1B). While the percentage identities of CPs from SmGV1–5, SmGV7 and SmGV9 to those from other gemykrogviruses are still higher than 83%, CPs from SmGV6 and SmGV8 share 72% similarity to their closest relative “Gemykibivirus humas3” only. BlastSearch hits for Rep, CP and putative ORF3 translation products are summarized in Supplementary Table S2 (sheets 2–4).

3.3. Characterization of BMMF-Related Sequences

In addition to nine genomoviral sequences, we retrieved another six circular ssDNA elements. Of those, three were recovered from sheep milk (two from milk at retail, one from herd C) and three from goat milk at retail. According to the BlastSearch hits, all reveal similarities to already published BMMF elements (Supplementary Table S2, sheet 1). A phylogenetic tree based on present sequences, previously published sequences found in water buffalo milk, BMMF from database entries, Sphinx 1.76 and Sphinx 2.36 is depicted in Figure 4A.
SmI3 and GmI6 belong to a cluster containing water buffalo milk isolates and other well characterized BMMF, such as CMI1.252 and HCBI6.252 (Figure 4A). GmI2 and SmI4 built a cluster with five sequences recently detected in water buffalo milk. SmI1 is only distantly related to the latter cluster. GmI5 is the most remote of our sequences showing relatedness only to BMMF1 isolates MSBI2.176, C1MI.9M.1 and C1MI.15M.1. Results depicted in the phylogenetic tree are consistent with the BlastSearch hits summarized in Supplementary Table S2 (sheet 1). Open reading frame prediction revealed the common presence of a rep-gene (Figure 4B). SmI4 bears a first short and a second larger rep that starts on ‘ATG’ or ‘TTG’ respectively. BlastSearch of in silico translated Reps showed highest similarities to BMMF1 or Acinetobacter sp. replication proteins (Supplementary Table S2, sheet 3). SmI1 and GmI5 are the only sequences lacking an additional, putative ORF.
All sequences from the present study could be assigned to the BMMF1 group according to their features. This group is mainly distinguishable from BMMF2 by the presence of a tandem repeat region that is present in the sheep and goat milk isolates as shown in Table 3. Tandem repeats that are typically located upstream the rep-gene possibly function as replicase recognition sites. The RCR mechanism of these DNA elements is further supported by inverted repeats, which are located 49–56 nt upstream the tandem repeat region. All BMMF1-related isolates exhibit such a palindromic sequence similar to a motif in BMMF1 elements published by zur Hausen et al. [17].

4. Conclusions

Results recorded in the present study substantiate our hypothesis that the occurrence of Cressdnaviricota and BMMF-related DNA elements in milk is not as narrowly restricted to “taurine” cattle as previously assumed. Sheep and goats kept for dairy purposes also shed those entities with milk. Thus, the present study contributes to the growing body of evidence on ssDNA elements frequently detectable in food of animal origin. From an epidemiological point of view, latest data published by Lechmann and colleagues in 2021 support the idea of interindividual and even interspecies transmission for gemykrogviruses [52]. Due to the marked discrepancies between the occurrence of viral DNA elements on herd level and in grocery packages an in depth prevalence assessment is needed. These future investigations should also include putative environmental CRESS sources like forage or water supply that might cause an affection of dairy ruminants and thus milk. Knowledge on affection levels of flocks and individuals could provide the first step for implementation of potential countermeasures. With regard to the circular ssDNA linked cancer hypothesis, further research efforts on underlying biological mechanisms and risk assessment are urgently needed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v13112176/s1, Figure S1: SDT-matrices of Reps and CPs, Table S1: Primer-sets, Table S2: BlastSearch hits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—E.M. and G.S.; Methodology–E.L. and R.F.; Investigation and Visualization–M.-T.K.; Validation and Writing–M.-T.K. and A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by funds from the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision by the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under the innovation support program (funding reference: 2819110217).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval was waived for this study because milk was collected during the daily milking routine on the farm.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All annotated genomes from this study were deposited in the GenBank database (Accession numbers OK148616-OK148630).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shulman, L.; Davidson, I. Viruses with Circular Single-Stranded DNA Genomes Are Everywhere! Annu. Rev. Virol. 2017, 4, 159–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tisza, M.J.; Pastrana, D.V.; Welch, N.L.; Stewart, B.; Peretti, A.; Starrett, G.J.; Pang, Y.-Y.S.; Krishnamurthy, S.R.; Pesavento, P.A.; McDermott, D.H.; et al. Discovery of several thousand highly diverse circular DNA viruses. eLife 2020, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dayaram, A.; Galatowitsch, M.L.; Argüello-Astorga, G.R.; van Bysterveldt, K.; Kraberger, S.; Stainton, D.; Harding, J.S.; Roumagnac, P.; Martin, D.P.; Lefeuvre, P.; et al. Diverse circular replication-associated protein encoding viruses circulating in invertebrates within a lake ecosystem. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 39, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Manuelidis, L. Nuclease resistant circular DNAs copurify with infectivity in scrapie and CJD. J. NeuroVirology 2010, 17, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Funk, M.; Gunst, K.; Lucansky, V.; Müller, H.; Hausen, H.Z.; de Villiers, E.-M. Isolation of Protein-Associated Circular DNA from Healthy Cattle Serum. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, e00846-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gunst, K.; Hausen, H.Z.; de Villiers, E.-M. Isolation of Bacterial Plasmid-Related Replication-Associated Circular DNA from a Serum Sample of a Multiple Sclerosis Patient. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, e00847-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Krupovic, M.; Varsani, A.; Kazlauskas, D.; Breitbart, M.; Delwart, E.; Rosario, K.; Yutin, N.; Wolf, Y.I.; Harrach, B.; Zerbini, F.M.; et al. Cressdnaviricota: A Virus Phylum Unifying Seven Families of Rep-Encoding Viruses with Single-Stranded, Circular DNA Genomes. J. Virol. 2020, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, L.; Rosario, K.; Breitbart, M.; Duffy, S. Eukaryotic Circular Rep-Encoding Single-Stranded DNA (CRESS DNA) Viruses: Ubiquitous Viruses With Small Genomes and a Diverse Host Range. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2019, 103, 71–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Varsani, A.; Krupovic, M. Sequence-based taxonomic framework for the classification of uncultured single-stranded DNA viruses of the family Genomoviridae. Virus Evol. 2017, 3, vew037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rosario, K.; Duffy, S.; Breitbart, M. A field guide to eukaryotic circular single-stranded DNA viruses: Insights gained from metagenomics. Arch. Virol. 2012, 157, 1851–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ling, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qi, G.; Yang, S.; Jingjiao, L.; Shen, Q.; Wang, X.; Cui, L.; Hua, X.; Deng, X.; et al. Viral metagenomics reveals significant viruses in the genital tract of apparently healthy dairy cows. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, H.; Li, S.; Mahmood, A.; Yang, S.; Wang, X.; Shen, Q.; Shan, T.; Deng, X.; Li, J.; Hua, X.; et al. Plasma virome of cattle from forest region revealed diverse small circular ssDNA viral genomes. Virol. J. 2018, 15, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, W.; Li, L.; Deng, X.; Kapusinszky, B.; Delwart, E. What is for dinner? Viral metagenomics of US store bought beef, pork, and chicken. Virol. 2014, 468-470, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cibulski, S.; de Lima, D.A.; dos Santos, H.F.; Teixeira, T.F.; Tochetto, C.; Mayer, F.Q.; Roehe, P.M. A plate of viruses: Viral metagenomics of supermarket chicken, pork and beef from Brazil. Virol. 2021, 552, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. De Villiers, E.-M.; Gunst, K.; Chakraborty, D.; Ernst, C.; Bund, T.; Hausen, H.Z. A specific class of infectious agents isolated from bovine serum and dairy products and peritumoral colon cancer tissue. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019, 8, 1205–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Whitley, C.; Gunst, K.; Müller, H.; Funk, M.; Hausen, H.Z.; de Villiers, E.-M. Novel Replication-Competent Circular DNA Molecules from Healthy Cattle Serum and Milk and Multiple Sclerosis-Affected Human Brain Tissue. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Falida, K.; Eilebrecht, S.; Gunst, K.; Hausen, H.Z.; de Villiers, E.-M. Isolation of Two Virus-Like Circular DNAs from Commercially Available Milk Samples. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, e00266-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Krupovic, M. Networks of evolutionary interactions underlying the polyphyletic origin of ssDNA viruses. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2013, 3, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Koonin, E.V.; Dolja, V.V.; Krupovic, M. Origins and evolution of viruses of eukaryotes: The ultimate modularity. Virol. 2015, 479-480, 2–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Bund, T.; Nikitina, E.; Chakraborty, D.; Ernst, C.; Gunst, K.; Boneva, B.; Tessmer, C.; Volk, N.; Brobeil, A.; Weber, A.; et al. Analysis of chronic inflammatory lesions of the colon for BMMF Rep antigen expression and CD68 macrophage interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hausen, H.Z.; Bund, T.; De Villiers, E. Specific nutritional infections early in life as risk factors for human colon and breast cancers several decades later. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 144, 1574–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Manuelidis, L. Prokaryotic SPHINX 1.8 REP protein is tissue-specific and expressed in human germline cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 120, 6198–6208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lamberto, I.; Gunst, K.; Müller, H.; Hausen, H.Z.; de Villiers, E.-M. Mycovirus-Like DNA Virus Sequences from Cattle Serum and Human Brain and Serum Samples from Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Pulina, G.; Milán, M.J.; Lavín, M.P.; Theodoridis, A.; Morin, E.; Capote, J.; Thomas, D.; Francesconi, A.; Caja, G. Invited review: Current production trends, farm structures, and economics of the dairy sheep and goat sectors. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 6715–6729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. König, M.-T.; Fux, R.; Link, E.; Sutter, G.; Märtlbauer, E.; Didier, A. Circular Rep-Encoding Single-Stranded DNA Sequences in Milk from Water Buffaloes (Bubalus arnee f. bubalis). Viruses 2021, 13, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Johnson, M.; Zaretskaya, I.; Raytselis, Y.; Merezhuk, Y.; McGinnis, S.; Madden, T.L. NCBI BLAST: A better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W5–W9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Muhire, B.M.; Varsani, A.; Martin, D.P. SDT: A Virus Classification Tool Based on Pairwise Sequence Alignment and Identity Calculation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite (EMBOSS) A. Available online: http://emboss.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/equicktandem (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  30. The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite (EMBOSS) B. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/palindrome (accessed on 22 September 2021).
  31. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). ORFfinder. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/ (accessed on 16 September 2021).
  32. Burland, T.G. DNASTAR’s Lasergene Sequence Analysis Software. Bioinform. Methods Protoc. 2000, 132, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zygoyiannis, D. Sheep production in the world and in Greece. Small Rumin. Res. 2006, 62, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Skapetas, B.; Bampidis, V. Goat production in the World: Present situation and trends. Livest Res Rural Dev 2016, 28, 200. [Google Scholar]
  35. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Gateway to dairy production and products. Available online: http://www.fao.org/dairy-production-products/production/dairy-animals/small-ruminants/en/ (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  36. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Felsenstein, J. CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Heyraud-Nitschke, F.; Schumacher, S.; Laufs, J.; Schaefer, S.; Schell, J.; Gronenborn, B. Determination of the origin cleavage and joining domain of geminivirus Rep proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 910–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Rosario, K.; Dayaram, A.; Marinov, M.; Ware, J.; Kraberger, S.; Stainton, D.; Breitbart, M.; Varsani, A. Diverse circular ssDNA viruses discovered in dragonflies (Odonata: Epiprocta). J. Gen. Virol. 2012, 93, 2668–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Laufs, J.; Traut, W.; Heyraud, F.; Matzeit, V.; Rogers, S.G.; Schell, J.; Gronenborn, B. In vitro cleavage and joining at the viral origin of replication by the replication initiator protein of tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 3879–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Timchenko, T.; de Kouchkovsky, F.; Katul, L.; David, C.; Vetten, H.J.; Gronenborn, B. A Single Rep Protein Initiates Replication of Multiple Genome Components of Faba Bean Necrotic Yellows Virus, a Single-Stranded DNA Virus of Plants. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 10173–10182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Gutierrez, C. Geminivirus DNA replication. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999, 56, 313–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ilyina, T.V.; Koonin, E.V. Conserved sequence motifs in the initiator proteins for rolling circle DNA replication encoded by diverse replicons from eubacteria, eucaryotes and archaebacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 3279–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gilbert, W.; Dressler, D. DNA Replication: The Rolling Circle Model. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1968, 33, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gorbalenya, A.; Koonin, E.V.; Wolf, Y.I. A new superfamily of putative NTP-binding domains encoded by genomes of small DNA and RNA viruses. FEBS Lett. 1990, 262, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Nash, T.E.; Dallas, M.B.; Reyes, M.I.; Buhrman, G.K.; Ascencio-Ibanñez, J.T.; Hanley-Bowdoin, L. Functional Analysis of a Novel Motif Conserved across Geminivirus Rep Proteins. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 1182–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Choudhury, N.R.; Malik, P.S.; Singh, D.K.; Islam, M.N.; Kaliappan, K.; Mukherjee, S.K. The oligomeric Rep protein of Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV) is a likely replicative helicase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 6362–6377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cleérot, D.; Bernardi, F. DNA Helicase Activity Is Associated with the Replication Initiator Protein Rep of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Geminivirus. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 11322–11330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Crooks, G.E.; Hon, G.; Chandonia, J.-M.; Brenner, S.E. WebLogo: A Sequence Logo Generator. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1188–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Kraberger, S.; Argüello-Astorga, G.R.; Greenfield, L.G.; Galilee, C.; Law, D.; Martin, D.P.; Varsani, A. Characterisation of a diverse range of circular replication-associated protein encoding DNA viruses recovered from a sewage treatment oxidation pond. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 31, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lechmann, J.; Ackermann, M.; Kaiser, V.; Bachofen, C. Viral infections shared between water buffaloes and small ruminants in Switzerland. J. Veter. Diagn. Investig. 2021, 33, 894–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 13 02176 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Genome-wide pairwise nucleotide similarity score matrix including full-length genomoviruses from this study and representative members from nine genera of the family Genomoviridae. Sequences from this study are highlighted in red. (B) Schematic genome organization of the herein identified genomoviral sequences shows at least two major open reading frames and a stem-loop structure in the intergenic region.
Figure 1. (A) Genome-wide pairwise nucleotide similarity score matrix including full-length genomoviruses from this study and representative members from nine genera of the family Genomoviridae. Sequences from this study are highlighted in red. (B) Schematic genome organization of the herein identified genomoviral sequences shows at least two major open reading frames and a stem-loop structure in the intergenic region.
Viruses 13 02176 g001
Viruses 13 02176 g002 550
Figure 2. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of representative sequences from nine genomoviral genera and genomoviral sequences from this study. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model [37]. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 500 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed [38]. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) are shown next to the branches [38]. Branch support values lower than 60% were not included. This analysis involved 39 nucleotide sequences. There were a total of 3641 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA software. All taxa are indicated by name and the corresponding GenBank accession number.
Figure 2. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of representative sequences from nine genomoviral genera and genomoviral sequences from this study. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model [37]. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 500 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed [38]. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) are shown next to the branches [38]. Branch support values lower than 60% were not included. This analysis involved 39 nucleotide sequences. There were a total of 3641 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA software. All taxa are indicated by name and the corresponding GenBank accession number.
Viruses 13 02176 g002
Viruses 13 02176 g003 550
Figure 3. Illustration of amino acid variations in conserved Rep motifs using WebLogo3 [50]. Reps of ICTV-listed gemykrog- and gemykibiviruses as well as from the nine genomoviral isolates identified herein have been included in the alignment.
Figure 3. Illustration of amino acid variations in conserved Rep motifs using WebLogo3 [50]. Reps of ICTV-listed gemykrog- and gemykibiviruses as well as from the nine genomoviral isolates identified herein have been included in the alignment.
Viruses 13 02176 g003
Viruses 13 02176 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of novel full-length Sphinx-like DNA genomes, Sphinx 1.76, Sphinx 2.36, selected members of BMMF group 1 and 2 and recently published Sphinx-like DNA genomes isolated from water buffalo milk. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model [37]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (“-“50216.13) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches [38]. Branch support values lower than 60% were not included. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. This analysis involved 51 nucleotide sequences. There were a total of 4500 positions in the final dataset. Black dots mark sequences found in this study. All taxa are indicated by name followed by the corresponding GenBank accession number. (B) Genomic organization of the six new BMMF-like genomes from this study. Red and orange arrows indicate rep-genes, blue arrows show further potential ORFs and purple bars represent tandem repeat regions.
Figure 4. (A) Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of novel full-length Sphinx-like DNA genomes, Sphinx 1.76, Sphinx 2.36, selected members of BMMF group 1 and 2 and recently published Sphinx-like DNA genomes isolated from water buffalo milk. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model [37]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (“-“50216.13) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches [38]. Branch support values lower than 60% were not included. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. This analysis involved 51 nucleotide sequences. There were a total of 4500 positions in the final dataset. Black dots mark sequences found in this study. All taxa are indicated by name followed by the corresponding GenBank accession number. (B) Genomic organization of the six new BMMF-like genomes from this study. Red and orange arrows indicate rep-genes, blue arrows show further potential ORFs and purple bars represent tandem repeat regions.
Viruses 13 02176 g004
Table
Table 1. Overview of all circular genomes detected in this study with accession numbers, sequence length, DNA-types, species and origin of isolation. Interestingly, two genomoviral sequences were isolated from sheep No. 115.
Table 1. Overview of all circular genomes detected in this study with accession numbers, sequence length, DNA-types, species and origin of isolation. Interestingly, two genomoviral sequences were isolated from sheep No. 115.
IsolateAccession
Number		Length in Nucleotides (nt)DNA-TypeSpeciesOrigin
SmGV1OK1486162191GenomovirusSheep No. 109Flock B
SmGV2OK1486172192GenomovirusSheep No. 110Flock B
SmGV3OK1486182190GenomovirusSheep No. 111Flock B
SmGV4OK1486192190GenomovirusSheep No. 113Flock B
SmGV5OK1486202191GenomovirusSheep No. 115Flock B
SmGV6OK1486212124GenomovirusSheep No. 115Flock B
SmGV7OK1486222190GenomovirusSheep No. 117Flock B
SmGV8OK1486232125GenomovirusSheep No. 151Flock C
GmGV9OK1486242122GenomovirusGoatRetail
SmI1OK1486252036Sphinx 1.76-like
(BMMF1)		Sheep No. 153Flock C
GmI2OK1486262092Sphinx 1.76-like
(BMMF1)		GoatRetail
SmI3OK1486272522Sphinx 1.76-like
(BMMF1)		SheepRetail
SmI4OK1486282093Sphinx 1.76-like
(BMMF1)		SheepRetail
GmI5OK1486291765Sphinx 1.76-like
(BMMF1)		GoatRetail
GmI6OK1486302522Sphinx 1.76-like
(BMMF1)		GoatRetail
Abbreviations: SmGV—sheep milk genomovirus; GmGV-goat milk genomovirus; SmI-sheep milk isolate: GmI–goat milk isolate.
Table
Table 2. Summary of conserved motifs in genomoviral sequences after intron clearing and in silico translation.
Table 2. Summary of conserved motifs in genomoviral sequences after intron clearing and in silico translation.
IsolateNonanucleotideMotif IMotif IIGRS MotifMotif IIIWalker AWalker BWalker C
SmGV1TAATATTATIITFPQVHYHVTAFDYFGAHGNIKSVRYVGKGPTRTGKTVFDDIMCMN
SmGV2TAATATTATIITFPQVHYHVTAFDYFGAHGNIKSVRYVGKGPTRTGKTVFDDIMCMD
SmGV3TAATATTATIITFPQVHYHVTAFDYFGAHGNIKSVRYVGKGPTRTGKTVFDDIMCMN
SmGV4TAATATTATIITFPQVHYHVTAFDYFGAHGNIKSVRYVGKGPTRTGKTVFDDIMCMN
SmGV5TAATATTATIITFPQVHYHVTAFDYFGAHGNIKSVRYVGKGPTRTGKTVFDDIMCMN
SmGV6TAATATTACLFTYSQTHLHARKFDVVGFHPNIISTIYATKGPSRTGKTVFDDIWLSN
SmGV7TAATATTATIITFPQVHYHVTAFDYFGAHGNIKSVRYVGKGPTRTGKTVFDDIMCMN
SmGV8TAATATTACLFTYSQTHLHARKFDVEGFHPNIISTIYATKGPSRTGKTVFDDIWLSN
GmGV9TAATATTATIIMFPQIHYHITAFDYFGAHGNIKSIRYVGKGPTRTGKTVFDDIMCMN
Table
Table 3. BMMF-like DNA isolates and inherent tandem repeat regions.
Table 3. BMMF-like DNA isolates and inherent tandem repeat regions.
IsolatePeriod SizeCopy NumberSequenceNt between TR and RepANt between TR and RepB
SmI1223.5CCTACGTTTACCCATCAATACC60-
GmI2223.5ACACCGTTTACCCATCAATATG59-
SmI3223.8ATACCCCTACGTTTACCGATCA60-
SmI4223.5CACCGTTTACCCATCAATATGA27151
GmI5223.8ATACTCCTAGGTTTACCTACCA59-
GmI6223.8ATACCCCTACGTTTACCGATCA60-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

König, M.-T.; Fux, R.; Link, E.; Sutter, G.; Märtlbauer, E.; Didier, A. Identification and Characterization of Circular Single-Stranded DNA Genomes in Sheep and Goat Milk. Viruses 2021, 13, 2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112176

AMA Style

König M-T, Fux R, Link E, Sutter G, Märtlbauer E, Didier A. Identification and Characterization of Circular Single-Stranded DNA Genomes in Sheep and Goat Milk. Viruses. 2021; 13(11):2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112176

Chicago/Turabian Style

König, Marie-Thérèse, Robert Fux, Ellen Link, Gerd Sutter, Erwin Märtlbauer, and Andrea Didier. 2021. "Identification and Characterization of Circular Single-Stranded DNA Genomes in Sheep and Goat Milk" Viruses 13, no. 11: 2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112176

APA Style

König, M.-T., Fux, R., Link, E., Sutter, G., Märtlbauer, E., & Didier, A. (2021). Identification and Characterization of Circular Single-Stranded DNA Genomes in Sheep and Goat Milk. Viruses, 13(11), 2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112176

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop