Next Article in Journal
Feasibility of Polyclonal Avian Immunoglobulins (IgY) as Prophylaxis against Human Norovirus Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
An Update on Current Antiviral Strategies to Combat Human Cytomegalovirus Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Insights into Common and Host-Specific Receptor-Binding Mechanisms in Algal Picorna-like Viruses
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Adoptive Immunotherapy for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection

Viruses 2022, 14(11), 2370; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112370
by Christopher P. Ouellette
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Viruses 2022, 14(11), 2370; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112370
Submission received: 5 October 2022 / Revised: 22 October 2022 / Accepted: 25 October 2022 / Published: 27 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antiviral Treatment for Cytomegalovirus Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Adoptive immunotherapy for CMV and other infections has huge clinical potential. The review article “Adoptive Immunotherapy for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus infection” provides a clear and systematic overview of the clinical use of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell therapy for infections during hematopoietic cell transplantation and solid organ transplantation. Overall, the manuscript is concise, well-written, and well-structured, relevant literature was included and can be accepted in this form.

Author Response

I appreciate the comments from the reviewer. I have made some additional modifications to the manuscript to address grammatical errors and improve the quality of the manuscript. 

Reviewer 2 Report

In this report, Christopher P. Ouellette discusses advancements, some encouraging results and challenges of widespread adoption of viral specific T cells in the prophylaxis of CMV infection of immunocompromised patients. The review is comprehensive and sufficiently critical to be useful for researchers and practitioners working in the field. A major drawback is the lack of graphical presentation which may be very helpful for those that are not strictly involved in the specific part of the field. I would also suggest including VST abbreviation explanation in line 95 because the explanation is present only in the abstract.

Author Response

I appreciate the comment from the reviewer. I have addressed the question of VST abbreviation by making notation earlier in the manuscript (line 63 in edited version). I do agree with the reviewer re: lack of a visual representation - I admittedly struggled to think of a visual representation that would be beneficial to those not in the field, especially ones not used in other manuscripts addressing this topic (referenced in this study). I would gladly accept suggestions of beneficial visual representations and include a graphic as able, especially if felt of benefit to the journal's readership. 

Back to TopTop