Next Article in Journal
Genetic Evolution of Avian Influenza A (H9N2) Viruses Isolated from Domestic Poultry in Uganda Reveals Evidence of Mammalian Host Adaptation, Increased Virulence and Reduced Sensitivity to Baloxavir
Next Article in Special Issue
Chetomin, a SARS-CoV-2 3C-like Protease (3CLpro) Inhibitor: In Silico Screening, Enzyme Docking, Molecular Dynamics and Pharmacokinetics Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Characterization of a Genetically Stable Infectious Clone for a Genotype I Isolate of Dengue Virus Serotype 1
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/v14092075
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Coronaviral Main Proteases by a Benzothiazole-Based Inhibitor

by
Xiaohui Hu
1,†,
Cheng Lin
2,†,
Qin Xu
3,†,
Xuelan Zhou
4,5,
Pei Zeng
4,5,
Peter J. McCormick
6,
Haihai Jiang
1,*,
Jian Li
2,* and
Jin Zhang
1,*
1
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
2
College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, China
3
Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201204, China
4
Shenzhen Crystalo Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518118, China
5
Jiangxi Jmerry Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ganzhou 341000, China
6
Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2022, 14(9), 2075; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14092075
Submission received: 15 August 2022 / Revised: 10 September 2022 / Accepted: 15 September 2022 / Published: 18 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viral Enzyme Inhibitors: Structure and Dynamics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The ongoing spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused hundreds of millions of cases and millions of victims worldwide with serious consequences to global health and economies. Although many vaccines protecting against SARS-CoV-2 are currently available, constantly emerging new variants necessitate the development of alternative strategies for prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Inhibitors that target the main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2, an essential enzyme that promotes viral maturation, represent a key class of antivirals. Here, we showed that a peptidomimetic compound with benzothiazolyl ketone as warhead, YH-53, is an effective inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV Mpros. Crystal structures of Mpros from SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV bound to the inhibitor YH-53 revealed a unique ligand-binding site, which provides new insights into the mechanism of inhibition of viral replication. A detailed analysis of these crystal structures defined the key molecular determinants required for inhibition and illustrate the binding mode of Mpros from other coronaviruses. In consideration of the important role of Mpro in developing antivirals against coronaviruses, insights derived from this study should add to the design of pan-coronaviral Mpro inhibitors that are safer and more effective.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), started in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in late 2019 and evolved into a worldwide pandemic with an extraordinary threat to global public health [1,2,3]. SARS-CoV-2 shares a similar genomic sequence with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, two viruses that caused the SARS and MERS outbreaks in 2003 and 2012 [4,5], by a sequence identity of 79% and 50%, respectively [6]. SARS-CoV-2 is the third notable coronavirus outbreak in the 21st century [7,8]. As of 7 September 2022, more than 603 million cases of COVID-19 and over 6.4 million deaths have been reported (https://covid19.who.int/, accessed on 7 September 2022), with numbers continuing to rise. The biomedical research community has made huge efforts to rapidly respond to this challenge, most notably the development of vaccines that are safe and effective against early SARS-CoV-2 strains [9,10,11]. However, the constantly emerging viral variants, including the most recently emerged Omicron sub-lineages BA.4 and BA.5, have compromised vaccine effectiveness [12,13,14,15]. Therefore, it is of utmost urgency to search for antiviral therapeutics for the prompt and effective therapy of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this context, development of drugs that target vital enzymes of SARS-CoV-2 has been of high interest.
The main protease (Mpro), also called 3CLpro (3C-like protease), represents an attractive antiviral drug target. After viral infection in host cells, the replicase gene encodes two large overlapping polyproteins, namely pp1a and pp1ab. Mpro is able to cleave pp1a and pp1ab at 11 sites, catalyzing the formation of a series of non-structural proteins critical for virus replication and transcription [16,17,18,19]. This role of Mpro in the viral life cycle is indispensable. Moreover, Mpro is highly conserved among different genera of coronaviruses and closely related homologs of Mpro are absent in humans [20,21]. Thus, inhibitors targeting Mpro can effectively impede the replication of different SARS-CoV-2 variants or future coronavirus outbreaks.
To date, various inhibitors have been developed against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro by using drug discovery strategies such as high-throughput screening, structure-based drug design, and drug repurposing [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Among these, PF-07321332 and PF-07304814 represent the most advanced inhibitors with therapeutic potential. PF-07321332 was developed by modifying the preclinical drug candidate PF-07304814, and is an analog of another peptidomimetic compound GC376, which has been used to treat cat coronavirus [27,28,29]. PF-07321332 is a potent and orally active inhibitor with good potency, safety, and pharmacokinetics properties [27]. Ritonavir can slow down the metabolic degradation of PF-07321332 in vivo when co-administrated. Unlike PF-07301332, PF-07304814 is designed to be administered by intravenous infusion [28]. Currently, Paxlovid (PF-07321332 and ritonavir) is authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use and has been applied to the early treatment of people with mild to moderate COVID-19, while PF-07304814 has completed a phase 1b study and should soon enter a phase 2/3 study. Despite this spectacular progress, the search for SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors is far from over. New SARS-CoV-2 strains with mutations in the main protease are emerging [30,31]. Development of new drugs with a different mechanism of action can complement the clinical use of existing remedies to reduce the number of cases, the severity, the fatality rate, and the potential development of drug resistance.
Previously, Thanigaimalai et al. identified a series of peptidomimetic inhibitors of SARS-CoV Mpro since the outbreak of SARS in 2003 [32]. In particular, YH-53 displayed not only potent SARS-CoV-2 inhibition in enzymatic and cellular antiviral assays but also a favorable absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion profile [33,34]. Additionally, YH-53 exhibits favorable metabolic stability, good pharmacokinetics, and has no significant toxicity [33]. All these characteristics makes YH-53 a promising lead compound in the development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. Unlike PF-07301332 and PF-07304814 which carry nitrile and hydroxymethyl ketone warheads for covalent inhibition, respectively, YH-53 has a benzothiazolyl ketone as warhead. In this study, we investigated the molecular basis for YH-53 inhibiting Mpro using a structure-based approach. We found that YH-53 broadly inhibited main protease activities of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV. Crystal structures of the main proteases of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV bound to the inhibitor YH-53 revealed structural similarities and differences of YH-53 in binding different Mpros. The results reported here confirm the broad-spectrum inhibition of coronaviral main proteases by YH-53 and are highly complementary to previous studies. Thus, this study supports that YH-53 can be used as a novel scaffold and provides critical information for the optimization and design of more potent inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Expression and Purification of Mpro Proteins from Human CoVs

The full-length gene encoding Mpro of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV were codon-optimized, synthesized, and cloned into pET-28a vector in-frame with a His6 tag and a TEV protease cleavage site at the N terminus. Expression and purification of the His-tagged Mpros were performed according to a standard method described previously by our lab [21]. TEV protease was added to remove the N-terminal His tag.

2.2. Enzymatic Inhibition Assays

Fluorogenic substrates as a donor and quencher pair were synthesized. The enzymatic inhibition assays were performed on a 384-well microplate according to a common protocol and PF-07321332 was used as a positive control. Briefly, YH-53 and PF-07321332 were dissolved in DMSO to produce a stock solution of 10 mM. Then, YH-53 and PF-07321332 were subjected to a 3-fold serial dilution in triplicate and mixed with a certain volume of main protease (200 nM) followed by 30 min of incubation at room temperature in the reaction buffer containing 50 mM Tris 7.3, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA. Subsequently, a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) substrate was added to the reaction system. The wells with only reaction buffer were used as blank controls, while the wells containing DMSO instead of tested compounds were used as vehicle treated controls. The reaction system was then monitored over a period of time and the luminescence (expressed as Relative Light Units, RLU) was recorded. By using the GraphPad Prism (v.9.3) software, inhibition activity (%) was calculated relative to vehicle (DMSO) control wells with the following formula: Inhibition(%) = 100% − [RLU(compound) − RLU(blank)/RLU(DMSO) − RLU(blank)] × 100%. Three independent experiments were performed.

2.3. Crystallization of Mpro-YH-53 Complexes

The recombinant Mpros were concentrated up to 5 mg/mL and incubated with YH-53 according to a 1:3 molar ratio for 30 min on ice before crystallization. Crystals were grown at 18 °C using the hanging drop vapor-diffusion method. After 3 to 5 days, the crystals of Mpros in complex with YH-53 were obtained. For the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 complex, the final crystallization conditions were 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 18% w/v PEG 10,000. The crystals of SARS-CoV Mpro in complex with YH-53 were grown in a reservoir solution comprising 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 12% PEG 8000, and 10% ethylene glycol, while the crystals of MERS-CoV Mpro in complex with YH-53 were obtained in a solution consisting of 10% PEG 200, 0.1 M Bis-Tris-propane pH 9.0, and 20% PEG 8000.

2.4. Data Collection, Structure Determination, and Refinement

Before data collection, crystals were soaked in a cryoprotection solution containing 20% glycerol and then flash cooled in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were collected at 100 K on a macromolecular crystallography beamline 02U1 (BL02U1) at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF, Shanghai, China). All the data sets were processed with HKL2000 software. The phase problem was solved with the molecular replacement method. Subsequent cycles of refinement to ideal resolution were performed using Phenix. The complete data collection and statistics of refinement are shown in Table 1.

3. Results

3.1. Inhibitory Activities of YH-53 against Coronavirus Mpros

Mpros of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV were expressed and purified as previously reported [21]. The inhibitory activities of YH-53 against Mpros of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV were determined by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay. PF-07321332 was used as a positive control with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values against SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV Mpros being 0.023 μM and 2.103 μM, respectively (Figure S1), which is similar to previous reports [27]. The results showed that YH-53 has a potent inhibition against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, with an IC50value of 0.1240 µM (Figure 1a), which is much lower than that of boceprevir but similar to that of GC376 [22]. YH-53 inhibits MERS-CoV Mpro with an IC50 value of 3.103 µM (Figure 1b). YH-53 also inhibits Mpro of SARS-CoV just like PF-07321332 (Figure S1). However, possibly due to the instability of SARS-CoV Mpro produced by our lab, the IC50 values of these two compounds cannot be accurately calculated. According to a previous study, YH-53 showed an IC50 value of 0.74 µM against SARS-CoV Mpro [32], which together with the present study suggests that YH-53 is a broad-spectrum inhibitor against main protease of coronaviruses.

3.2. Inhibitory Mechanism of YH-53 against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro

In order to figure out the inhibitory mechanisms of YH-53, we first determined the crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro in complex with YH-53 at 1.93 Å resolution using the cocrystallization method (Table 1). The space group is P1211 with unit cell dimensions of a = 55.56, b = 99.44, and c = 59.67 Å. The crystallographic asymmetric unit comprises a dimer form of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. In fact, a variety of studies previously demonstrated that only the dimeric form of Mpro exhibits enzymatic activity [35]. As shown in Figure 2, the Mpro molecule can be divided into three domains, namely, domain I (residues 10 to 99), domain II (residues 100 to 184), and domain III (residues 201 to 303). YH-53 can be found in both protomer A and protomer B (Figure 2a). Specifically, YH-53 exhibits an extended conformation in the active site, which is located in the cleft between domains I and II of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (Figure 2b). YH-53 employs a unique benzothiazolyl ketone moiety as the P1′-directed warhead. The benzothiazole group of YH-53 is well accommodated in the S1′ pocket of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (Figure 2b). As clearly indicated by the electron density map, the carbonyl carbon of the benzothiazole group in YH-53 forms a C-S covalent bond with the sulfur atom (2.14 Å C-S bond length) of catalytic residue Cys145 in SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (Figure 2c). This nucleophilic addition reaction results in the conversion of the carbonyl to a carbinol hydroxyl, which forms hydrogen-bonding interactions with the backbone NH of Cys145 and a water molecule for stabilization. An additional hydrogen-bonding interaction is formed between the nitrogen atom of the benzothiazole group and the backbone NH of Gly143 via a bridging water molecule. Additionally, several polar bonds are formed between the benzothiazole group and His41. As shown in Figure 2d,e, YH-53 contains a pyrrolidine-2-one group at the P1 position which matches the S1 pocket well. The carbonyl of the pyrrolidine-2-one group forms a hydrogen-bonding interaction with the NƐ2 atom of His163, while the nitrogen atom forms additional hydrogen-bonding interactions with the carboxy groups of Glu166 and Phe140. In addition, the carbonyl oxygen of His164 forms a hydrogen bond with the main-chain NH of the P1 moiety. YH-53 displays an isobutyl group at the P2 subsite which fits the S2 pocket well by mainly using hydrophobic interactions. Moreover, the side chain carbonyl of Gln189 forms a hydrogen-bond interaction with the main chain amide group at the P2 subsite, which creates a more closed conformation in the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 complex. YH-53 presents a 4-methoxy-indole group at the P3 position, which occupies the S4 pocket of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. The nitrogen atom at the P3 subsite forms a hydrogen-bond interaction with the main chain carbonyl group of Glu166, while the main chain carbonyl group at the P3 subsite forms a hydrogen-bond interaction with the main chain amide group of Glu166. The methoxy group of YH-53 forms an additional hydrogen-bonding interaction with the nitrogen atom of Thr190. Therefore, YH-53 occupies the active site of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro by covalently binding to Cys145 and noncovalently interacting with several conserved residues, including His41, Phe140, Gly143, Cys145, His163, His164, and Glu166. This indicates the potential of YH-53 to serve as a covalent inhibitor to prevent the binding and cleavage of substrates by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.
Recently, the crystal structure of YH-53 in complex with SARS-CoV-2 Mpro has also been reported by others [33,34]. A good agreement was observed when we compared our YH-53-bound Mpro complex to available SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 structures (PDB ID 7E18 and PDB ID 7JKV) (Figure S2), with the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of equivalent Cα atomic positions between two superimposed structures being 0.396 Å and 1.441 Å, respectively.

3.3. Crystal Structures of YH-53 in Complex with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV Mpro

We also solved the crystal structures of YH-53 in complex with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV Mpros at 2.04 Å and 1.99 Å resolutions (Table 1), respectively. The SARS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 complex is crystallized in space group P1, while the MERS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 complex is crystallized in space group P212121. Compared overall, the SARS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 and MERS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 structures show high similarity with the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 structure, with the RMSD of equivalent Cɑ atoms being 1.040 Å and 1.322 Å (Figure 3a), respectively. As in the case of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 structure, ligands can be found in both protomer A and protomer B in the SARS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 and MERS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 structures. Two protomers in these three complexes adopt similar binding modes when bound to the ligand (Figure S3). As expected, comparison of the three complex structures shows a similar conformation of YH-53 molecule. However, there are slight differences in the orientation of YH-53 in the substrate-binding sites of Mpros of SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS-CoV (Figure 3b). Particularly, YH-53 forms a C-S covalent bond with the catalytic cysteine residue of Mpros of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV (Figure 4a,b), and forms several hydrogen-bonding interactions with some conserved residues (Figure S4), as is the case with SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. The main differences for YH-53 interacting with Mpros of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV were observed at the P1′ and P3 subsites (Figure 4c,d). In the SARS-CoV-YH-53 complex, the carbinol hydroxyl at the P1′ subsite forms an additional hydrogen-bonding interaction with the backbone NH of Ser144 when compared with SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53. Furthermore, the hydrogen bond between the methoxy group of YH-53 and Thr190 is impaired. In the case of the MERS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 structure, the benzothiazole ring of YH-53 flips over and moves outward from the active site when compared with SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 and SARS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 (Figure 3b and Figure 4d). This binding feature also helps to build a hydrogen-bonding interaction between the benzothiazole group and Ser144, but deprives the hydrogen-bonding interactions between YH-53 and residues Thr190 and Gln189. Furthermore, it is the nitrogen atom of the benzothiazole that interacts with His41, but not the sulfur atom, which forms a hydrogen bond. In addition, the main chain carbonyl group at the P2 subsite forms a hydrogen-bond interaction with a water molecule. These binding differences may contribute to the differences in inhibition observed in enzymatic assays. Therefore, these observations provide the structural basis for how YH-53 inhibits different coronavirus Mpros and support YH-53 as a lead compound for drug development.

4. Discussion

The unprecedented pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 has been threatening global health since the beginning of 2020. Thus, it is an extremely urgent task to develop effective drugs against SARS-CoV-2. Main protease of SARS-CoV-2 is highly conserved and essential to the viral life cycle, making it an appealing drug target. As SARS-CoV-2 constantly mutates, inhibitors targeting such a viral target with conserved and essential properties may improve our preparedness against future variants of concern. Moreover, residues His41 and Cys145 act as catalytic dyad, and a molecule that will interact strongly with these catalytic dyad residues may be the key to establishing strong binding to and inhibition of this enzyme. To this end, various substrate analogs carrying a chemical warhead targeting the catalytic cysteine residues have been identified as peptidomimetic inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro with a covalent mechanism of action. Indeed, covalent inhibitors are of great interest as therapeutic drugs in the treatment of COVID-19. We previously reported the crystal structures of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro in complex with two well-designed covalent peptidomimetic drug candidates by Pfizer [36,37], namely PF-07321332 and PF-07304814. They contain a nitrile group and a hydroxymethyl ketone acting as the warheads respectively, and exhibit excellent inhibitory activity as well as potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 infection activity.
YH-53 is a unique covalent inhibitor that utilizes the benzothiazole group as warhead. Benzothiazole-based compounds are heterocyclic systems in which a benzene ring is fused with a thiazole ring and contains nitrogen and sulfur atoms in its chemical structure. Such an electron attractive group can greatly enhance the nucleophilic reaction with catalytic residue Cys145. In this study, the enzymatic assay showed that YH-53 is a potent benzothiazole-based inhibitor against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. The crystal structure further revealed that YH-53 covalently binds to the catalytic cysteine of Mpro, and forms multiple hydrogen bonds with conserved residues within the active site, which, together with previous reports, will provide additional valuable information for drug development against SARS-CoV-2 [33,34].
We also solved the crystal structures of YH-53 in complex with Mpros of two coronaviruses that can infect humans (MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV). Structural comparison indicates that YH-53 employs a similar binding pattern to SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV Mpros but with some differences. These data complement the previous report about the structure of YH-53 in complex with SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and are beneficial to understand the broad-spectrum inhibitory activity of YH-53. Since Mpro is highly conserved among different coronaviruses, YH-53 can be used as a lead for the development of potent drugs against future coronaviral outbreaks.

5. Conclusions

There is an urgent need to develop additional drugs to expand the arsenal of antivirals against SARS-CoV-2. Main protease is an essential component in the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle and, thus, is one of the most promising targets in developing antiviral agents. We solved the crystal structures of main proteases of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV bound to the inhibitor YH-53, which contains benzothiazolyl ketone as the warhead. Detailed analysis and structural comparison provided insight into the molecular mechanism of main protease inhibition by YH-53 and could facilitate the development of broad-spectrum anti-coronavirus agents.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v14092075/s1, Figure S1: Enzymatic inhibition activities of YH-53 and PF-07321332, Figure S2: Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 structure we reported in this study to SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 structures reported previously, Figure S3: Structural comparison of protomer A and B of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV Mpros bound to YH-53, Figure S4: Sequence alignment of Mpros from different coronaviruses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.L., H.J., and J.Z.; supervision: J.L., Q.X., and J.Z.; formal analysis: J.L., C.L., X.H., X.Z., P.Z., and J.Z; investigation: J.L., H.J., and J.Z.; Writing—original draft: H.J.; Writing—review and editing: H.J., J.L., X.H., P.J.M., and J.Z.; project administration: H.J., J.L., and J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81974514 and 31770795) and the Jiangxi Province Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 20181ACB20014). J.L. was supported by Gannan Medical University (QD201910), Jiangxi Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (20212ACB216001), Jiangxi Key Research and Development Program (20203BBG73063), and Jiangxi “Double Thousand Plan (jxsq2019101064)”. J.Z. was supported by the Thousand Young Talents Program of China and the CAS “Light of West China” Program (2021). P.J.M. was supported by the Foreign Talent project of Jiangxi Province. This work was also supported by Ganzhou COVID-19 Emergency Research Project (2020.17), Major science and technology programs of Ganzhou City (2020.67), and Ganzhou Zhanggong District COVID-19 prevention and control key research projects (2020.67). P.Z. were supported by Shenzhen COVID-19 Special funding 2022036 (Grant No. JSGG20220606140801003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors, Shenzhen Crystalo Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Jiangxi Jmerry Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd. declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, X.G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wu, J.T.; Leung, K.; Leung, G.M. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: A modelling study. Lancet 2020, 395, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, C.; Horby, P.W.; Hayden, F.G.; Gao, G.F. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 2020, 395, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Poutanen, S.M.; Low, D.E.; Henry, B.; Finkelstein, S.; Rose, D.; Green, K.; Tellier, R.; Draker, R.; Adachi, D.; Ayers, M.; et al. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 1995–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zaki, A.M.; van Boheemen, S.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Osterhaus, A.D.; Fouchier, R.A. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1814–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stoddard, S.V.; Stoddard, S.D.; Oelkers, B.K.; Fitts, K.; Whalum, K.; Whalum, K.; Hemphill, A.D.; Manikonda, J.; Martinez, L.M.; Riley, E.G.; et al. Optimization Rules for SARS-CoV-2 Mpro Antivirals: Ensemble Docking and Exploration of the Coronavirus Protease Active Site. Viruses 2020, 12, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, Y.; Peng, F.; Wang, R.; Yange, M.; Guan, K.; Jiang, T.; Xu, G.; Sun, J.; Chang, C. The deadly coronaviruses: The 2003 SARS pandemic and the 2020 novel coronavirus epidemic in China. J. Autoimmun. 2020, 109, 102434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. da Costa, V.G.; Moreli, M.L.; Saivish, M.V. The emergence of SARS, MERS and novel SARS-2 coronaviruses in the 21st century. Arch. Virol. 2020, 165, 1517–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Polack, F.P.; Thomas, S.J.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Perez, J.L.; Marc, G.P.; Moreira, E.D.; Zerbini, C.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, Y.; Tenchov, R.; Smoot, J.; Liu, C.; Watkins, S.; Zhou, Q. A Comprehensive Review of the Global Efforts on COVID-19 Vaccine Development. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 512–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dai, L.; Zheng, T.; Xu, K.; Han, Y.; Xu, L.; Huang, E.; An, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, M.; et al. A Universal Design of Betacoronavirus Vaccines against COVID-19, MERS, and SARS. Cell 2020, 182, 722–733.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, L.; Iketani, S.; Guo, Y.; Chan, J.F.; Wang, M.; Liu, L.; Luo, Y.; Chu, H.; Huang, Y.; Nair, M.S.; et al. Striking antibody evasion manifested by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2022, 602, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, M.; Zhang, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, B.; Liang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Nie, J.; Wu, J.; Su, X.; Qu, X.; et al. Reduced sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Lambda variant to monoclonal antibodies and neutralizing antibodies induced by infection and vaccination. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2022, 11, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Planas, D.; Veyer, D.; Baidaliuk, A.; Staropoli, I.; Guivel-Benhassine, F.; Rajah, M.M.; Planchais, C.; Porrot, F.; Robillard, N.; Puech, J.; et al. Reduced sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta to antibody neutralization. Nature 2021, 596, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tuekprakhon, A.; Nutalai, R.; Dijokaite-Guraliuc, A.; Zhou, D.; Ginn, H.M.; Selvaraj, M.; Liu, C.; Mentzer, A.J.; Supasa, P.; Duyvesteyn, H.M.E.; et al. Antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 from vaccine and BA.1 serum. Cell 2022, 185, 2422–2433.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koudelka, T.; Boger, J.; Henkel, A.; Schönherr, R.; Krantz, S.; Fuchs, S.; Rodríguez, E.; Redecke, L.; Tholey, A. N-Terminomics for the Identification of In Vitro Substrates and Cleavage Site Specificity of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. Proteomics 2021, 21, e2000246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jin, Z.; Du, X.; Xu, Y.; Deng, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Peng, C.; et al. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 2020, 582, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hegyi, A.; Ziebuhr, J. Conservation of substrate specificities among coronavirus main proteases. J. Gen. Virol. 2002, 83, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mengist, H.M.; Dilnessa, T.; Jin, T. Structural Basis of Potential Inhibitors Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 622898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, L.; Lin, D.; Sun, X.; Curth, U.; Drosten, C.; Sauerhering, L.; Becker, S.; Rox, K.; Hilgenfeld, R. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved α-ketoamide inhibitors. Science 2020, 368, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, J.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, F.; Lin, C.; McCormick, P.J.; Jiang, F.; Luo, J.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Q.; et al. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease in complex with the natural product inhibitor shikonin illuminates a unique binding mode. Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 661–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, C.; Sacco, M.D.; Hurst, B.; Townsend, J.A.; Hu, Y.; Szeto, T.; Zhang, X.; Tarbet, B.; Marty, M.T.; Chen, Y.; et al. Boceprevir, GC-376, and calpain inhibitors, I.I.; XII inhibit SARS-CoV-2 viral replication by targeting the viral main protease. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 678–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kitamura, N.; Sacco, M.D.; Ma, C.; Hu, Y.; Townsend, J.A.; Meng, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; Ba, M.; Szeto, T.; et al. Expedited Approach toward the Rational Design of Noncovalent SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 2848–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Drayman, N.; DeMarco, J.K.; Jones, K.A.; Azizi, S.A.; Froggatt, H.M.; Tan, K.; Maltseva, N.I.; Chen, S.; Nicolaescu, V.; Dvorkin, S.; et al. Masitinib is a broad coronavirus 3CL inhibitor that blocks replication of SARS-CoV-2. Science 2021, 373, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, C.H.; Stone, E.A.; Deshmukh, M.; Ippolito, J.A.; Ghahremanpour, M.M.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Spasov, K.A.; Zhang, S.; Takeo, Y.; Kudalkar, S.N.; et al. Potent Noncovalent Inhibitors of the Main Protease of SARS-CoV-2 from Molecular Sculpting of the Drug Perampanel Guided by Free Energy Perturbation Calculations. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhao, Y.; Du, X.; Duan, Y.; Pan, X.; Sun, Y.; You, T.; Han, L.; Jin, Z.; Shang, W.; Yu, J.; et al. High-throughput screening identifies established drugs as SARS-CoV-2 PLpro inhibitors. Protein Cell 2021, 12, 877–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Owen, D.R.; Allerton, C.M.N.; Anderson, A.S.; Aschenbrenner, L.; Avery, M.; Berritt, S.; Boras, B.; Cardin, R.D.; Carlo, A.; Coffman, K.J.; et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 2021, 24, 1586–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boras, B.; Jones, R.M.; Anson, B.J.; Arenson, D.; Aschenbrenner, L.; Bakowski, M.A.; Beutle, N.; Binder, J.; Chen, E.; Eng, H.; et al. Preclinical characterization of an intravenous coronavirus 3CL protease inhibitor for the potential treatment of COVID19. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vuong, W.; Khan, M.B.; Fischer, C.; Arutyunova, E.; Lamer, T.; Shields, J.; Saffran, H.A.; McKay, R.T.; van Belkum, M.J.; Joyc, M.A.; et al. Feline coronavirus drug inhibits the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 and blocks virus replication. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abe, K.; Kabe, Y.; Uchiyama, S.; Iwasaki, Y.W.; Ishizu, H.; Uwamino, Y.; Takenouch, T.; Uno, S.; Ishii, M.; Maruno, T.; et al. Pro108Ser mutation of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro reduces the enzyme activity and ameliorates the clinical severity of COVID-19. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cross, T.J.; Takahashi, G.R.; Diessner, E.M.; Crosby, M.G.; Farahmand, V.; Zhuang, S.; Butts, C.T.; Martin, R.M. Sequence Characterization and Molecular Modeling of Clinically Relevant Variants of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. Biochemistry 2020, 59, 3741–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Thanigaimalai, P.; Konno, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Koiwai, Y.; Taguchi, A.; Takayama, K.; Yakushiji, F.; Akaji, T.; Chen, S.-N.; Naser-Tavakolian, A.; et al. Development of potent dipeptide-type SARS-CoV 3CL protease inhibitors with novel P3 scaffolds: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and docking studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 68, 372–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Konno, S.; Kobayashi, K.; Senda, M.; Funai, Y.; Seki, Y.; Tamai, I.; Schäkel, L.; Sakata, K.; Pillaiyar, T.; Taguchi, A.; et al. 3CL Protease Inhibitors with an Electrophilic Arylketone Moiety as Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 2926–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hattori, S.I.; Higashi-Kuwata, N.; Hayashi, H.; Allu, S.R.; Raghavaiah, J.; Bulut, H.; Das, D.; Anson, B.J.; Lendy, E.K.; Takamatsu, Y.; et al. A small molecule compound with an indole moiety inhibits the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 and blocks virus replication. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shi, J.; Sivaraman, J.; Song, J. Mechanism for controlling the dimer-monomer switch and coupling dimerization to catalysis of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 3C-like protease. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 4620–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, J.; Lin, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhong, F.; Zeng, P.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, B.; Fan, X.; McCormick, P.J.; et al. Structural Basis of the Main Proteases of Coronavirus Bound to Drug Candidate PF-07321332. J. Virol. 2022, 96, e0201321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, J.; Lin, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhong, F.; Zeng, P.; McCormick, P.J.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, J. Structural Basis of Main Proteases of Coronavirus Bound to Drug Candidate PF-07304814. J. Mol. Biol. 2022, 434, 167706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 14 02075 g001 550
Figure 1. Enzymatic inhibition of YH-53 against main proteases of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV. (a) Inhibition of YH-53 against main protease of SARS-CoV-2. (b) Inhibition of YH-53 against main protease of MERS-CoV. Main proteases were preincubated in the reaction buffer with various concentrations of YH-53 at room temperature for 30 min before reacting with the FRET substrate. The IC50 values were calculated using the GraphPad Prism software.
Figure 1. Enzymatic inhibition of YH-53 against main proteases of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV. (a) Inhibition of YH-53 against main protease of SARS-CoV-2. (b) Inhibition of YH-53 against main protease of MERS-CoV. Main proteases were preincubated in the reaction buffer with various concentrations of YH-53 at room temperature for 30 min before reacting with the FRET substrate. The IC50 values were calculated using the GraphPad Prism software.
Viruses 14 02075 g001
Viruses 14 02075 g002 550
Figure 2. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro in complex with YH-53. (a) Overall structure of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro in complex with YH-53. Three domains and two protomers of Mpro are labeled. The substrate binding pocket is situated within the black dotted box. YH-53 is shown as sticks. (b) An enlarged view of the substrate-binding pocket. Mpro is shown as surface and YH-53 is shown as sticks. (c) A C-S covalent bond forms between Cys145 and the benzothiazolyl ketone of YH-53. The 2Fo–Fc density map contoured at 1.0 σ is shown as blue mesh. (d) The detailed interaction in the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 structure is shown with the residues of SARS-CoV-2 involved in inhibitor binding (within 3.3 Å), shown as sticks. W represents the water molecule. Hydrogen-bonding interactions are indicated as black dashed lines. (e) Schematic interaction between YH-53 and Mpro. Hydrogen-bonding interactions are shown as orange dashed lines.
Figure 2. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro in complex with YH-53. (a) Overall structure of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro in complex with YH-53. Three domains and two protomers of Mpro are labeled. The substrate binding pocket is situated within the black dotted box. YH-53 is shown as sticks. (b) An enlarged view of the substrate-binding pocket. Mpro is shown as surface and YH-53 is shown as sticks. (c) A C-S covalent bond forms between Cys145 and the benzothiazolyl ketone of YH-53. The 2Fo–Fc density map contoured at 1.0 σ is shown as blue mesh. (d) The detailed interaction in the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 structure is shown with the residues of SARS-CoV-2 involved in inhibitor binding (within 3.3 Å), shown as sticks. W represents the water molecule. Hydrogen-bonding interactions are indicated as black dashed lines. (e) Schematic interaction between YH-53 and Mpro. Hydrogen-bonding interactions are shown as orange dashed lines.
Viruses 14 02075 g002
Viruses 14 02075 g003 550
Figure 3. Structural comparison of Mpro-YH-53 complexes. (a) Overall comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 (green), SARS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 (yellow), and MERS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 (orange) structures. YH-53 is shown as sticks. (b) A zoomed-in view of the substrate binding pocket of main protease. YH-53 in SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53, SARS-CoV Mpro-YH-53, and MERS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 structures are shown as green, yellow, and orange sticks, respectively.
Figure 3. Structural comparison of Mpro-YH-53 complexes. (a) Overall comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53 (green), SARS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 (yellow), and MERS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 (orange) structures. YH-53 is shown as sticks. (b) A zoomed-in view of the substrate binding pocket of main protease. YH-53 in SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53, SARS-CoV Mpro-YH-53, and MERS-CoV Mpro-YH-53 structures are shown as green, yellow, and orange sticks, respectively.
Viruses 14 02075 g003
Viruses 14 02075 g004 550
Figure 4. Crystal structures of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV Mpros in complex with YH-53. (a,b) A C-S covalent bond forms between Cys145 of SARS-CoV Mpro (a) or MERS-CoV Mpro (b) and the benzothiazole group of YH-53. The 2Fo-Fc density map contoured at 1.0 σ is shown as a blue mesh. (c,d) The detailed interaction in the complex structure is shown with the residues of SARS-CoV Mpro (c) or MERS-CoV Mpro (d) involved in inhibitor binding (within 3.3 Å), displayed as sticks. Hydrogen bond interactions are shown as black dashed lines.
Figure 4. Crystal structures of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV Mpros in complex with YH-53. (a,b) A C-S covalent bond forms between Cys145 of SARS-CoV Mpro (a) or MERS-CoV Mpro (b) and the benzothiazole group of YH-53. The 2Fo-Fc density map contoured at 1.0 σ is shown as a blue mesh. (c,d) The detailed interaction in the complex structure is shown with the residues of SARS-CoV Mpro (c) or MERS-CoV Mpro (d) involved in inhibitor binding (within 3.3 Å), displayed as sticks. Hydrogen bond interactions are shown as black dashed lines.
Viruses 14 02075 g004
Table
Table 1. Statistics for data processing and model refinement of Mpro-YH-53 complexes.
Table 1. Statistics for data processing and model refinement of Mpro-YH-53 complexes.
SARS-CoV-2 Mpro-YH-53SARS-CoV Mpro-YH-53MERS-CoV Mpro-YH-53
PDB code7XRS7YGQ7XRY
Data collection
SynchrotronSSRFSSRFSSRF
Beam lineBL02U1BL02U1BL02U1
Wavelength (Å)0.979180.979190.97918
Space groupP1211P1P212121
a,b,c (Å)55.56, 99.44, 59.6755.06, 60.59, 68.3080.02, 93.8, 102.16
α,β,γ (°)90.00, 107.93, 90.0090.20, 120.72, 108.4390.00, 90.00, 90.00
Total reflections252,466174,371518,857
Unique reflections46,18050,17553,633
Resolution (Å)1.93(2.03–1.93)2.04(2.15–2.04)1.99(2.09–1.99)
R-merge (%)5.7(49.4)2.8(31.6)6.2(92.6)
Mean I/σ (I)8.1/2.59.3/2.511.0/2.6
Completeness (%)98.9(92.9)96.4(96.3)99.9(99.5)
Redundancy5.5(3.6)3.5(3.1)9.7(7.8)
Refinement
Resolution (Å)52.86–1.9331.40–2.0444.86–1.99
Rwork/Rfree(%)19.96/24.3120.54/23.5022.36/25.35
Atoms466745524800
Mean temperature factor (Å2)33.946.829.0
Bond lengths (Å) 0.0070.0070.007
Bond angles (°)0.9521.0340.92
Preferred97.9898.1497.82
Allowed2.021.862.18
Outliers000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, X.; Lin, C.; Xu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zeng, P.; McCormick, P.J.; Jiang, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Coronaviral Main Proteases by a Benzothiazole-Based Inhibitor. Viruses 2022, 14, 2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14092075

AMA Style

Hu X, Lin C, Xu Q, Zhou X, Zeng P, McCormick PJ, Jiang H, Li J, Zhang J. Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Coronaviral Main Proteases by a Benzothiazole-Based Inhibitor. Viruses. 2022; 14(9):2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14092075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Xiaohui, Cheng Lin, Qin Xu, Xuelan Zhou, Pei Zeng, Peter J. McCormick, Haihai Jiang, Jian Li, and Jin Zhang. 2022. "Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Coronaviral Main Proteases by a Benzothiazole-Based Inhibitor" Viruses 14, no. 9: 2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14092075

APA Style

Hu, X., Lin, C., Xu, Q., Zhou, X., Zeng, P., McCormick, P. J., Jiang, H., Li, J., & Zhang, J. (2022). Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Coronaviral Main Proteases by a Benzothiazole-Based Inhibitor. Viruses, 14(9), 2075. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14092075

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop