Next Article in Journal
Pressure for Pattern-Specific Intertypic Recombination between Sabin Polioviruses: Evolutionary Implications
Previous Article in Journal
Neurotropism In Vitro and Mouse Models of Severe and Mild Infection with Clinical Strains of Enterovirus 71
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hijacking of the Ubiquitin/Proteasome Pathway by the HIV Auxiliary Proteins
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/v9110352
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Therapeutic Strategies against Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Cancers Using Proteasome Inhibitors

by
Kwai Fung Hui
1,2,†,
Kam Pui Tam
1,2,† and
Alan Kwok Shing Chiang
1,2,*
1
Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
2
Center for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2017, 9(11), 352; https://doi.org/10.3390/v9110352
Submission received: 31 October 2017 / Revised: 17 November 2017 / Accepted: 20 November 2017 / Published: 21 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viruses, ERAD, and the Proteasome)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is closely associated with several lymphomas (endemic Burkitt lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma and nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma) and epithelial cancers (nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric carcinoma). To maintain its persistence in the host cells, the virus manipulates the ubiquitin-proteasome system to regulate viral lytic reactivation, modify cell cycle checkpoints, prevent apoptosis and evade immune surveillance. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the mechanisms by which the virus manipulates the ubiquitin-proteasome system in EBV-associated lymphoid and epithelial malignancies, to evaluate the efficacy of proteasome inhibitors on the treatment of these cancers and discuss potential novel viral-targeted treatment strategies against the EBV-associated cancers.

1. Introduction

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a gamma-herpesvirus which infects more than 90% of the world’s population. It is closely associated with several lymphomas (endemic Burkitt lymphoma (BL), Hodgkin lymphoma and nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma) and epithelial cancers (nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and gastric carcinoma). Since proteasome is crucial for cellular homeostasis, disruption of its function is found to be present in numerous cancers, including virus-associated cancers [1,2]. It has been shown that manipulation of the function of ubiquitin-proteasome system by EBV (and another gamma-herpesvirus, Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)) is indispensable for the survival and replication of the viruses in the infected cells. The viruses can express both lytic and latent proteins to either inhibit the proteasomal degradation of important viral proteins or promote the degradation of unwanted cellular proteins in the virus-associated cancers [3,4,5]. For instance, the disruption of PML (promyelocytic leukaemia) nuclear bodies and subsequent inhibition of ubiquitin-proteasome degradation system by EBV genes (BZLF1, BRLF1, BDLF1, BLLF2, BFLF2, BPLF1, BNRF1, latent membrane protein (LMP)-1, EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 and EBNA-3B), KSHV genes (replication and transcription activator (RTA), viral interferon regulatory factor (vIRF)-3, open reading frame (ORF)-64 and ORF-75) and mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)-68 genes (ORF-64 and ORF-75C) are demonstrated to be essential for evading the innate immune response during early infection stage [6]. Such immune evasion mechanisms during early viral infection are comprehensively reviewed by Full et al. in 2017 [6]. In this review, we focus on how EBV proteins utilize the ubiquitin-proteasome system to promote degradation of cellular proteins for their survival and the potential usage of proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of EBV-associated malignancies. Specifically, the functions of the key viral proteins (BDLF3, EBNA-1, LMP-1 and EBNA-3C) involved in the manipulation of ubiquitin-proteasome system for inhibition of cell cycle checkpoint, apoptosis and immune surveillance in the EBV-associated malignancies are summarized. The efficacy of proteasome inhibitors on the treatment of EBV-associated malignancies and potential novel viral-targeted treatment strategies using proteasome inhibitors against EBV-associated cancers are discussed.

2. The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System

2.1. Structure and Function of Proteasome

The 26S proteasome is composed of 19S regulatory particle (RP) and 20S core particle (CP), resulting in 26 Svedberg units in sucrose gradient sedimentation. α- and β-subunits constitute the barrel-shaped 20S CP. Two sets of seven α-subunits at both ends form the end rings, whereas two sets of seven β-subunits in the middle form the central rings of 20S CP (Figure 1). The N-termini of β1, β2 and β5 are the active sites responsible for the proteolysis of substrates. β1, β2 and β5 are responsible for proteolytic cleavage of post-glutamylpeptidyl-hydrolyzing (PGPH), trypsin-like and chymotrypsin-like substrates, respectively. Virtually all peptide bonds can be hydrolyzed by these three proteolytic subunits. [7,8]. On the other hand, 19S RP is a proteasome activator (PA) which facilitates the recognition of targeted substrates with polyubiquitin modification and insertion of substrates into the central cavity of 20S CP through adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent mechanism. The ubiquitin molecules are subsequently recycled from the modified proteins by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) [9].

2.2. Proteasomal Degradation Mediated by Ubiquitination

Most of the protein degradations catalyzed by proteasome are initiated by polyubiquitination of the targeted proteins. This process is a covalent attachment of ubiquitin, which consists of 76 amino acids, to the substrates and assembles a chain with at least four ubiquitin molecules. First, ubiquitin (Ub) is activated by one of the two ubiquitin-activating enzymes, known as E1, through ATP-dependent mechanism, forming a thioester bond (S) between the cysteine residue at E1 and the carboxyl terminus of ubiquitin. The activated ubiquitin in this Ub-S-E1 intermediate is then transferred by one of the 38 ubiquitin conjugating enzymes, known as E2, forming another intermediate, Ub-S-E2, which serves to bring ubiquitin to the targeted substrate and the ubiquitin-protein ligase, E3 [10]. Multiple ubiquitin molecules are added on the targeted protein to form an ubiquitin chain which is recognized by 19S RP to activate proteolysis [11,12,13]. There is also an E4 ubiquitination factor which is responsible for elongation of the ubiquitin chain in some cases [14].

3. Interaction of EBV with Ubiquitin-Proteasome System in Host Cells

As mentioned above, manipulation of the normal function of ubiquitin-proteasome system by EBV (and KSHV) is indispensable for the replication of the viruses and survival of the virus-infected cells. It has been shown that some viral proteins of EBV share similar functions with those of KSHV in the manipulation of ubiquitin-proteasome system. Therefore, understanding the mechanism of the interaction between the viral proteins of KSHV and the proteasome may further provide insight into EBV-proteasome interaction. In this section, the functions of the key viral proteins involved in the manipulation of ubiquitin-proteasome system for inhibition of immune surveillance, cell cycle checkpoint and apoptosis in the EBV- and KSHV-associated malignancies are summarized (refer to Figure 1 & Table 1).

3.1. Immunological Evasion

Ubiquitin-proteasome system is important for generation of antigenic peptides of viral proteins for presentation to cytotoxic T cell (CTL) in the context of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I [15]. However, EBV develops strategies to evade immune detection and elimination through inhibition of ubiquitin-proteasome system. In latently infected B cells, the glycine-alanine repeat (GAr) domain of EBNA-1 was shown to be the key element in the inhibition of proteasomal processing of EBNA-1 into antigenic peptides and hence prevented MHC class I presentation to CTL and subsequent clearance of the infected cells [16]. This type of immunological evasion is also observed in KSHV-infected cells. The latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA) of KSHV, which is functionally similar to EBNA-1 though without any sequence homology, prevented the generation of antigenic peptides for MHC class I presentation by inhibiting proteasome [17].
It was also confirmed that BDLF3, a late lytic protein, triggered the internalization and proteasomal degradation of both MHC class I and II molecules on the surface of infected cells, resulting in impairment of immune recognition of the EBV-infected cells by antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ cells [18]. Interestingly, K3 and K5 proteins encoded by KSHV also served similar function as stimulating polyubiquitination and endocytosis of MHC class I molecules from the surface of infected cells. However, unlike BDLF3, the MHC proteins were degraded by lysosome rather than proteasome [19].
In addition, BNRF2, EBNA1 and BZLF1 proteins of EBV could also disrupt the PML-nuclear bodies and subsequently evade the intrinsic antiviral response via proteasome-dependent and independent mechanisms [6]. On the other hand, RNA transcriptional activator (RTA) of KSHV could act as a viral E3-ubiquitin ligase and stabilize the RTA-associated ubiquitin ligase (RAUL) of the host cells. As a result, RTA could facilitate the proteasomal degradation of Interferon regulatory factors (IRF3 and IRF7), hence evading the innate immunity [20,21].

3.2. Modulation of Cell Cycle Checkpoints

The major EBV protein that overrides cell cycle regulation is Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen-3C (EBNA-3C) which is expressed in Type III latency. EBNA-3C is known to be crucial for transformation, proliferation and survival of infected B cells. It was found to epigenetically repress the transcription of p16INK4A, which is a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, hence stabilizing the cyclin D1/CDK6 complex, which increases the phosphorylation and ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of pRb and allows the cells to enter G1 phase [22]. In addition, the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation of pRb is also enhanced by recruitment of the SKP1-Cul1-F-box protein (SCFSkp2) E3-ubiquitin ligase when EBNA-3C stably associates with pRb [4,23]. The transcription factors of E2F family are released from pRb and activate transcription of cyclin/CDK complexes such as cyclin D1/CDK4/6 and cyclins A and E/CDK2, promoting cell cycle progression from G0 to G1 and from G1 to S phase [23].
EBNA-3C also stabilizes proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (Pim-1) by physical interaction and enhances its phosphorylation activity on CDK inhibitor p21WAF1, leading to proteasomal degradation of p21WAF1 and escape of G1-S phase cell cycle arrest [24]. In addition, EBNA-3C activates Skp2, which is one of the two integral proteins of SCFSkp2 E3-ubiquitin ligase, leading to phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of another CDK inhibitor p27KIP1. This releases the inhibitory effect of p27KIP1 to cyclin A/CDK2 complex, stimulating the entry into S phase [25]. Moreover, EBNA-3C specifically interacts with and activates ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of Bcl-6. As a result, the normal suppression of cyclin D1 by Bcl-6 is abrogated, promoting G1-S phase transition [26]. Since cyclin A is also essential for the initiation of mitosis, the stabilization of cyclin A by EBNA-3C might also assist EBV-infected cells to progress to M phase [27,28].
Of note, p27KIP1 is also directed to proteasomal degradation in primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) by KSHV viral proteins, K-cyclin and V-cyclin, which are homologs of human cyclin D2 and form a complex with CDK4/6. The Thr48 residue of p27KIP1 is phosphorylated by K/V-cyclin-CDK6 complex, resulting in polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of p27KIP1 [29,30].

3.3. Inhibition of Apoptosis

Several tumor viruses such as EBV, KSHV, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human papillomaviruses (HPV) were found to promote oncogenesis through prevention of apoptosis coupled with deregulation of the cell cycle. Numerous pro-apoptotic tumor suppressors are suppressed by oncogenic proteins or degraded by proteasome [31]. EBV depends on proteasomal processing of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) precursor p100 into p52 to activate the non-canonical NF-κB pathway, which in turn promotes the expression of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP), including XIAP, cIAP-1 and c-IAP-2 for cell survival through the action of LMP-1 [32]. EBNA-1 stably associates with herpesvirus associated ubiquitin-proteasome system (HAUSP), also known as ubiquitin-specific protease 7 (USP7), by binding to the same pocket that p53 binds. Thus, the deubiquitination of p53 by USP7 is blocked, leading to its degradation [33]. EBNA-3C protects MDM2 from ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation through physical interaction between its N-terminal 130–190 amino acid residues and the central acidic domain of MDM2, further suppressing p53 [34]. On the other hand, EBNA-3C stimulates proteasomal degradation of Bcl-6, releasing the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-2 from suppression by Bcl-6 [26]. Some viral proteins encoded by KSHV can also inhibit apoptosis, for instance, vIRF4 which inhibits the phosphorylation of Ser 15 in p53 by ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, leading to destabilization as well as proteasomal degradation of p53 [35]. vIRF4 also stabilizes MDM2 E3-ubiquitin ligase, promoting proteasomal degradation of p53 [36].

4. Rationale of Using Proteasome Inhibitor to Treat EBV-Associated Cancers

4.1. Overview of Proteasome Inhibitors

Proteasome inhibitors are primarily designed to target on β5 of the 26S proteasome [37,38]. The proteasome inhibitors exert inhibition via either non-covalent (reversible) or covalent (irreversible) binding to the active sites of 20S core particle. There are 8 major structural classes of proteasome inhibitors which include aldehydes, boronates, epoxyketones, α-ketoaldehydes, β-lactones, vinyl sulfones, syrbactins and bacteria specific oxatiazol-2-ones. Some of the proteasome inhibitors, including those in the classes of boronates, epoxyketones and β-lactones, are currently the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for treatment of various types of cancers or are tested in clinical trials (Table 2). Bortezomib was the first proteasome inhibitor approved by FDA in 2003 for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma [39]. Proteasome inhibitors were demonstrated to inhibit cell growth and promote cell death in a variety of cancers such as multiple myeloma, anaplastic thyroid cancer, colon cancer, pancreatic cancer [38,40,41]. Several possible mechanisms were suggested to explain the anti-cancer effects mediated by proteasome inhibitors. Inhibition of NF-κB signaling pathway was believed to be one of the key anti-cancer mechanisms. Proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib could significantly suppress the expression of NF-κB and its downstream signaling in various types of cancer cell lines. Another possible cell death mechanism induced by proteasome inhibitors involved phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1 (PMAIP1), a pro-apoptotic player of Bcl-2 family. Upon suppression or activation of such signaling pathways, both intrinsic mitochondrial and extrinsic (death receptor) apoptotic pathways were induced. Various cell cycle regulatory proteins such as p21WAF1 and p27KIP1 and pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bax and Bid were affected by proteasome inhibitors.

4.2. Effect of Proteasome Inhibitors on Cell Cycle of EBV-Associated Malignancies

EBV expresses different latency patterns in different EBV-associated malignancies [42]. During primary infection of B cells, EBV expresses the full panel of transforming proteins which drive the continuous proliferation of B cells via modulation of cell cycle checkpoints. EBNA-3 proteins, in particular -3A and -3C, are known to play a role in the manipulation of the cell cycle in EBV-infected B cells. In 1994, Allday et al. first discovered the cell cycle regulatory property of EBNA-3C by showing that expression of wild-type EBNA-3C was able to rescue the G1 arrest in EBNA-3C mutated cells [43]. EBNA-3C was later found to promote G1-S transition by enhancing pRb degradation [4], stabilizing cyclin D1 [44] and facilitating p27KIP1 degradation [4]. Besides, EBNA-3C could co-operate with EBNA-3A to epigenetically repress the INK4 family of the CDK inhibitors (e.g., p14 and p16INK4A) to support the continuous proliferation of lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) [45,46,47,48,49]. EBNA-3A and -3C could also abrogate the G2/M checkpoint for the survival of EBV-transformed B cells in response to various cytotoxic stresses [50,51,52,53,54].
Proteasome inhibitors were shown to induce G2/M arrest through generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and up-regulation of cell cycle regulators such as p21WAF1 and p27KIP1 in certain cancer types [55,56,57]. In our previous study, we observed that bortezomib could induce G2/M arrest in P3HR1 Wp-restricted BL cells [58]. However, the percentage of cells in G2/M phase was much lower in LCLs which expressed higher level of EBNA-3 proteins [58]. Similarly, EBNA-3 proteins were reported to disrupt G2/M arrest induced by azelaic bishydroxamine in LCLs [50]. We postulated that EBNA-3C would be the major protein involved in the disruption of G2/M arrest because of its ability to modulate the expression of various cell cycle regulatory proteins. [42,45,46,47,48] For instance, EBNA-3C was shown to stabilize cyclin A and assist the EBV-infected cells to progress to M phase [27,28]. Interestingly, bortezomib could also induce the expression of pRb and p21WAF1 which were downregulated by ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation [4,22,23,24,25].

4.3. Effect of Proteasome Inhibitors on Apoptosis of EBV-Associated Malignancies

EBV latent proteins, including LMP-1, EBNA-3A and EBNA-3C, were shown to be oncogenic and might contribute to the resistance of EBV-associated cancers to apoptotic inducers. LMP-1 is a well characterized viral protein which possesses strong oncogenic activity through activation of NF-κB pathway in both BL and NPC [59,60]. We had shown that bortezomib, which is known to inhibit the NF-κB pathway, could induce apoptosis in BL, gastric carcinoma and NPC [58,61]. Another study showed that bortezomib could inhibit the proteasome-mediated activation of p52 and thus suppress the anti-apoptotic function initiated by the non-canonical NF-κB pathway in EBV-transformed LCLs [62]. EBV-positive BL cells of type III latency were found to be more resistant to killing by nocodazole or taxol when compared with EBV-negative or latency I BL cells [63]. Wp-restricted BL cells were also more resistant to the treatment with ionomycin or anti-IgM when compared with latency I BL cells [64]. Further studies showed that EBV offered essential anti-apoptotic effects to both Wp-restricted BL and post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLD) cells but not to latency I BL cells which do not rely on EBV for their survival [65]. Interestingly, we found that bortezomib could induce more potent apoptosis in LCLs when compared with BL cells, suggesting a potential specific effect of bortezomib in disrupting the survival function conferred by EBV in the LCLs [58]. The mechanisms of induction of apoptosis would be related to the disruption of downstream survival signaling of EBNA-3C through its effects on p53, MDM2 and Bcl-6 (as discussed in Section 3.3) [34,66,67].

4.4. Reactivation of Viral Lytic Cycle by Proteasome Inhibitors

Bortezomib was reported to reactivate the lytic cycle of EBV in EBV-associated BL cells [62,68]. The EBV lytic reactivation was shown to be related to the induction of CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteinβ (C/EBPβ) and unfolded protein response [68]. Induction of EBV lytic cycle by bortezomib could activate the radioisotope [125I]2′-fluoro-2′-deoxy-β-d-5-iodouracil-arabinofuranoside to selectively suppress the growth of Burkitt lymphoma xenografts in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice [69]. Similarly, induction of KSHV lytic cycle in xenograft model of primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) had also been reported [70]. Recently, a study found that bortezomib could reactivate the lytic cycle of both EBV and KSHV from latency in several PEL and BL cell lines through activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and autophagy [71]. However, such viral lytic cycle reactivation by bortezomib had not been observed in a panel of EBV-associated tumor cell lines we tested. In contrast, our results showed that bortezomib suppressed the lytic cycle reactivation by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in EBV-associated cancer cell lines [61,72]. Lymphoid cells were more refractory to the induction of EBV lytic cycle than epithelial cells. Indeed, we found that HDAC inhibitors and some novel compounds, which could reactivate EBV lytic cycle in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric carcinoma cells, could only induce low expression level of EBV lytic proteins in one out of six lymphoid cell lines [58,73,74,75,76].

4.5. Effect of Proteasome Inhibitors on Immune Evasion

EBV proteins such as BZLF1, BNRF2, BDLF3 and EBNA-1 utilize the proteasomal system to facilitate the virus to escape from human immune surveillance [6]. However, the effect of proteasome inhibitors on immune evasion of EBV-associated malignancies remains largely unknown. Recently, a study showed that proteasome inhibitors could increase the expression of lymphocyte stimulatory cytokine such as interleukines IL-2, IL-12 and IL-15 and activate the p38 and Akt pathways in tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells [77]. Interestingly, another recent study showed that bortezomib could inhibit the downstream signaling of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, a major inducer of immune tolerance during tumor development, through suppression of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) in NPC cells [78]. More investigations on the effect of proteasome inhibitors on immune evasion mechanisms of EBV are needed to further develop proteasome inhibitors as a new class of therapeutic agents against EBV-associated cancers.

5. Potential Novel Viral-Targeted Strategies against EBV-Associated Cancers by Combination of Proteasome and Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors

Proteasome inhibitors were reported to have synergistic effects when co-administered with other types of anti-tumor compounds [38]. The most well recognized combination would be the combination of bortezomib and a HDAC inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Combined bortezomib and SAHA was shown to be effective in the treatment of hematologic malignancies such as multiple myeloma [79], mantle cell lymphoma [80], cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [81] and leukemia [82,83]. The drug combination induced cancer cell death through caspase activation [80,82,83,84], generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [79,80,81,82,85], enhanced histone acetylation [86,87], aggresome disruption [88], NF-κB inactivation [79,80,82,83,85], p53 activation, p21WAF1 up-regulation [79,81,82,84], c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) activation [79,83] and mitochondrial membrane dysfunction [79,82,83,84]. The anti-tumor effects of combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitors on EBV-associated epithelial and lymphoid malignancies will be discussed in this section.

5.1. Combination of Proteasome and HDAC Inhibitors on EBV-Associated Epithelial Malignancies

The signaling pathways affected by combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitors such as the NF-κB, p53, p21WAF1 and JNK pathways are important for the pathogenesis of EBV-associated epithelial malignancies including NPC and gastric carcinoma. Our group reported that combination of bortezomib and SAHA could synergistically induce apoptosis of NPC cells through a ROS-dependent mechanism [61]. We also found that combination of bortezomib and SAHA could induce an enhanced acetylation of histone through a caspase-8-dependent mechanism [61]. Such caspase-8-dependent histone acetylation by combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitors was also reported in leukemic cells [87]. However, we did not observe any up-regulation of Rb or p53 in the NPC cells in contrast to the strong up-regulation of Rb and p53 reported in other cancers upon histone hyperacetylation [89]. In addition, NF-κB inactivation was also found to be not important in the apoptosis induced by combination of bortezomib and SAHA in NPC cells [61]. The non-mitochondrial production of ROS via the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase complex and endoplasmic reticulum system might be involved in the induction of apoptosis by combination of bortezomib and SAHA [90]. We further found that combination of bortezomib and several class I HDAC inhibitors (which inhibit HDAC-1, -2, -3 and -8 isoforms)), including MS-275, apicidin and romidepsin, also potently induced apoptosis of NPC cells [91]. The cell death mechanism was dependent on ROS and endoplasmic reticulum stress but independent of inhibition of HDAC6, suggesting the aggresome disruption mechanism was not involved in the cell death of EBV-positive NPC cells [91,92,93,94]. Combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitors could also induce the up-regulation of p21WAF1 and down-regulation of c-myc in the EBV-positive NPC cells and other cancer cell types [79,81,82,84,95].
Combination of bortezomib and romidepsin could induce synergistic killing of gastric carcinoma cells via a summative effect of caspase-dependent apoptosis and caspase-independent autophagy [72]. Our laboratory and others had shown that the autophagic cell death induced by combination of bortezomib and romidepsin was mediated through a strong production of ROS followed by disruption of lysosomes in cancer cells [72,96,97,98,99]. Notably, combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitors induced the generation of ROS, which was demonstrated to induce the expression of LMP1 and EBV lytic cycle reactivation, in both NPC and gastric carcinoma cells [100,101]. On the other hand, EBNA1 was also shown to induce the generation of ROS in NPC cells [102]. Thus, it would be interesting to investigate the potential interaction of between the EBV viral proteins and ROS during the killing of EBV-positive epithelial malignancies by combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitors.

5.2. Combination of Proteasome and HDAC Inhibitors on EBV-Associated Lymphoid Cells

In EBV-positive lymphoid cells, EBNA-3C could downregulate the expression of tumor suppressor genes such as Bim, p53, p16INK4A and p21WAF1 through epigenetic modification of the host cell genomes [22,45,47,49,103,104,105,106], either through interaction with C-terminal binding protein or direct recruitment of HDAC enzymes [54,107,108,109]. Because EBNA-3C could manipulate both proteasomal degradation (discussed in Section 3.2 and Section 3.3) and histone deacetylation pathways to maintain the survival of lymphoid cells, we postulated that combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitors could act synergistically to kill the cells by counteracting EBNA-3C’s function. We showed that combination of bortezomib and SAHA induced synergistic killing of BL cells or LCLs which express EBNA-3 proteins [58]. The mechanism of killing was probably related to the up-regulation of p21WAF1, generation of ROS, induction of DNA damage response (DDR) and diminished G2/M arrest in the EBNA-3 expressing cells [58]. Indeed, it had been reported that induction of DDR could trigger off apoptosis in cancer cells after overriding G2/M arrest by phosphorylation of cdc25c, which could be dysregulated by EBNA-3C [60,110,111].

5.3. Pre-Clinical Data of Combination of Proteasome and HDAC Inhibitors on Treatment of EBV-Associated Malignancies

Bortezomib, SAHA and romidepsin are FDA-approved for the treatment of cancers [73,74,112,113]. We tested combination of bortezomib and either SAHA or romidepsin on the killing of BL, NPC and gastric carcinoma in vivo. We found that the drug combinations could synergistically suppress the growth of, BL, NPC and gastric carcinoma xenografts in nude or SCID mice [58,61,72,91]. Promisingly, bortezomib, SAHA and romidepsin could mediate strong killing on the EBV-associated malignancies at concentrations that are much lower than the clinically achievable concentrations in patients’ plasma [114,115]. The findings that the drug combinations could induce apoptosis of NPC cells in a ROS-dependent manner support the testing of potential complementary action of the drug combination to radiotherapy in the treatment of NPC patients [116]. Further testing of the in vivo anti-tumor effect of combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitors on more EBV-associated diseases, including a subset of Wp-restricted EBV-associated BL, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, diffuse large B cell lymphoma and AIDS-associated lymphoproliferative disease is warranted.

6. Concluding Remarks

In summary, the survival and replication of EBV in EBV-infected cancer cells require the manipulation of the host’s ubiquitin-proteasome system through the action of a myriad of viral proteins to mediate escape from immune surveillance, disruption of cell cycle regulation and suppression of apoptosis (summarized in Figure 1). Proteasome inhibitor, such as bortezomib, can counteract these viral functions and are promising agents to incorporate into novel therapeutic regimens against EBV-associated cancers. Combination of bortezomib and HDAC inhibitors represents a novel therapeutic regimen that can induce potent synergistic killing of EBV-associated lymphoid and epithelial cancers and warrants testing of its efficacy in clinical trials.

Acknowledgments

This project is funded by NPC Area of Excellence (AoE/M 06/08 Center for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Research), Committee on Research and Conference Grants (CRCG) (#10401264) and Epstein-Barr virus research (#20004525) grants of Alan Kwok Shing Chiang.

Author Contributions

This review was conceptualized and written through the efforts of all the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Blanchette, P.; Branton, P.E. Manipulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by small DNA tumor viruses. Virology 2009, 384, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ding, F.; Xiao, H.; Wang, M.; Xie, X.; Hu, F. The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in cancer development and treatment. Front. Biosci. 2014, 19, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Honda, R.; Tanaka, H.; Yasuda, H. Oncoprotein MDM2 is a ubiquitin ligase E3 for tumor suppressor p53. FEBS Lett. 1997, 420, 25–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Knight, J.S.; Sharma, N.; Robertson, E.S. Epstein-Barr virus latent antigen 3C can mediate the degradation of the retinoblastoma protein through an SCF cellular ubiquitin ligase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 18562–18566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Iwahori, S.; Murata, T.; Kudoh, A.; Sato, Y.; Nakayama, S.; Isomura, H.; Kanda, T.; Tsurumi, T. Phosphorylation of P27KIP1 by Epstein-Barr virus protein kinase induces its degradation through SCFSKP2 ubiquitin ligase actions during viral lytic replication. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 18923–18931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Full, F.; Hahn, A.S.; Grosskopf, A.K.; Ensser, A. Gammaherpesviral tegument proteins, PML-nuclear bodies and the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Viruses 2017, 9, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Groll, M.; Ditzel, L.; Lowe, J.; Stock, D.; Bochtler, M.; Bartunik, H.D.; Huber, R. Structure of 20s proteasome from yeast at 2.4 Å resolution. Nature 1997, 386, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Unno, M.; Mizushima, T.; Morimoto, Y.; Tomisugi, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Yasuoka, N.; Tsukihara, T. The structure of the mammalian 20s proteasome at 2.75 Å resolution. Structure 2002, 10, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, C.W.; Jacobson, A.D. Functions of the 19S complex in proteasomal degradation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013, 38, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hershko, A.; Heller, H.; Elias, S.; Ciechanover, A. Components of ubiquitin-protein ligase system. Resolution, affinity purification and role in protein breakdown. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 8206–8214. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Ye, Y.; Rape, M. Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Elsasser, S.; Chandler-Militello, D.; Muller, B.; Hanna, J.; Finley, D. Rad23 and Rpn10 serve as alternative ubiquitin receptors for the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 26817–26822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Husnjak, K.; Elsasser, S.; Zhang, N.; Chen, X.; Randles, L.; Shi, Y.; Hofmann, K.; Walters, K.J.; Finley, D.; Dikic, I. Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 2008, 453, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Koegl, M.; Hoppe, T.; Schlenker, S.; Ulrich, H.D.; Mayer, T.U.; Jentsch, S. A novel ubiquitination factor, E4, is involved in multiubiquitin chain assembly. Cell 1999, 96, 635–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Michalek, M.T.; Grant, E.P.; Gramm, C.; Goldberg, A.L.; Rock, K.L. A role for the ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway in MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation. Nature 1993, 363, 552–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Levitskaya, J.; Sharipo, A.; Leonchiks, A.; Ciechanover, A.; Masucci, M.G. Inhibition of ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent protein degradation by the Gly-Ala repeat domain of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 12616–12621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kwun, H.J.; da Silva, S.R.; Qin, H.; Ferris, R.L.; Tan, R.; Chang, Y.; Moore, P.S. The central repeat domain 1 of kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) latency associated-nuclear antigen 1 (LANA1) prevents cis MHC class I peptide presentation. Virology 2011, 412, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Quinn, L.L.; Williams, L.R.; White, C.; Forrest, C.; Zuo, J.; Rowe, M. The missing link in Epstein-Barr virus immune evasion: The BDLF3 gene induces ubiquitination and downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) and MHC-II. J. Virol. 2015, 90, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Coscoy, L.; Ganem, D. Kaposi's sarcoma—Associated herpesvirus encodes two proteins that block cell surface display of MHC class I chains by enhancing their endocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 8051–8056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Honda, K.; Yanai, H.; Negishi, H.; Asagiri, M.; Sato, M.; Mizutani, T.; Shimada, N.; Ohba, Y.; Takaoka, A.; Yoshida, N.; et al. IRF-7 is the master regulator of type-I interferon-dependent immune responses. Nature 2005, 434, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yu, Y.; Hayward, G.S. The ubiquitin E3 ligase RAUL negatively regulates type I interferon through ubiquitination of the transcription factors IRF7 and IRF3. Immunity 2010, 33, 863–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Maruo, S.; Zhao, B.; Johannsen, E.; Kieff, E.; Zou, J.; Takada, K. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigens 3C and 3A maintain lymphoblastoid cell growth by repressing P16INK4A and p14ARF expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 1919–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kashuba, E.; Yurchenko, M.; Yenamandra, S.P.; Snopok, B.; Isaguliants, M.; Szekely, L.; Klein, G. Ebv-encoded EBNA-6 binds and targets MRS18–2 to the nucleus, resulting in the disruption of PRB-E2F1 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5489–5494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Banerjee, S.; Lu, J.; Cai, Q.; Sun, Z.; Jha, H.C.; Robertson, E.S. EBNA3C augments PIM-1 mediated phosphorylation and degradation of p21 to promote B-cell proliferation. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Knight, J.S.; Sharma, N.; Robertson, E.S. SCFSKP2 complex targeted by Epstein-Barr virus essential nuclear antigen. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25, 1749–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pei, Y.; Banerjee, S.; Jha, H.C.; Sun, Z.; Robertson, E.S. An essential EBV latent antigen 3C binds Bcl6 for targeted degradation and cell proliferation. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vardy, L.; Pesin, J.A.; Orr-Weaver, T.L. Regulation of cyclin a protein in meiosis and early embryogenesis. Proc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1838–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pagano, M.; Pepperkok, R.; Verde, F.; Ansorge, W.; Draetta, G. Cyclin a is required at two points in the human cell cycle. Embo. J. 1992, 11, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Mann, D.J.; Child, E.S.; Swanton, C.; Laman, H.; Jones, N. Modulation of p27(KIP1) levels by the cyclin encoded by kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ellis, M.; Chew, Y.P.; Fallis, L.; Freddersdorf, S.; Boshoff, C.; Weiss, R.A.; Lu, X.; Mittnacht, S. Degradation of p27(KIP) CDK inhibitor triggered by kaposi’s sarcoma virus cyclin-CDK6 complex. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 644–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Saha, A.; Kaul, R.; Murakami, M.; Robertson, E.S. Tumor viruses and cancer biology: Modulating signaling pathways for therapeutic intervention. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010, 10, 961–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Eliopoulos, A.G.; Caamano, J.H.; Flavell, J.; Reynolds, G.M.; Murray, P.G.; Poyet, J.L.; Young, L.S. Epstein-Barr virus—Encoded latent infection membrane protein 1 regulates the processing of p100 NF-κB2 to p52 via an IKKγ/nemo-independent signalling pathway. Oncogene 2003, 22, 7557–7569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Holowaty, M.N.; Zeghouf, M.; Wu, H.; Tellam, J.; Athanasopoulos, V.; Greenblatt, J.; Frappier, L. Protein profiling with Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen-1 reveals an interaction with the herpesvirus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease HAUSP/USP7. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 29987–29994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Saha, A.; Murakami, M.; Kumar, P.; Bajaj, B.; Sims, K.; Robertson, E.S. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C augments MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation by deubiquitinating MDM2. J. Virol 2009, 83, 4652–4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shin, Y.C.; Nakamura, H.; Liang, X.; Feng, P.; Chang, H.; Kowalik, T.F.; Jung, J.U. Inhibition of the ATM/p53 signal transduction pathway by kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus interferon regulatory factor 1. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 2257–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, H.R.; Toth, Z.; Shin, Y.C.; Lee, J.S.; Chang, H.; Gu, W.; Oh, T.K.; Kim, M.H.; Jung, J.U. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus viral interferon regulatory factor 4 targets MDM2 to deregulate the p53 tumor suppressor pathway. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 6739–6747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kisselev, A.F.; Goldberg, A.L. Proteasome inhibitors: From research tools to drug candidates. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 739–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Manasanch, E.E.; Orlowski, R.Z. Proteasome inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 14, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kane, R.C.; Farrell, A.T.; Sridhara, R.; Pazdur, R. United States food and drug administration approval summary: Bortezomib for the treatment of progressive multiple myeloma after one prior therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 2955–2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Huang, C.Y.; Wei, C.C.; Chen, K.C.; Chen, H.J.; Cheng, A.L.; Chen, K.F. Bortezomib enhances radiation-induced apoptosis in solid tumors by inhibiting CIP2A. Cancer Lett. 2012, 317, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Shi, W.Y.; Wang, L.; Xiao, D.; Yao, Y.; Yang, F.; Jiang, X.X.; Leboeuf, C.; Janin, A.; Chen, S.J.; Zhao, W.L. Proteasome inhibitor bortezomib targeted tumor—Endothelial cell interaction in T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Ann. Hematol. 2011, 90, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rickinson, A.B.; Kieff, E. Epstein-barr Virus, 5th ed.; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; pp. 2657–2700. [Google Scholar]
  43. Allday, M.J.; Farrell, P.J. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen EBNA3C/6 expression maintains the level of latent membrane protein 1 in G1-arrested cells. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 3491–3498. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Saha, A.; Halder, S.; Upadhyay, S.K.; Lu, J.; Kumar, P.; Murakami, M.; Cai, Q.; Robertson, E.S. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C facilitates G1-S transition by stabilizing and enhancing the function of cyclin D1. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1001275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hertle, M.L.; Popp, C.; Petermann, S.; Maier, S.; Kremmer, E.; Lang, R.; Mages, J.; Kempkes, B. Differential gene expression patterns of EBV infected EBNA-3A positive and negative human B lymphocytes. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Saha, A.; Robertson, E.S. Impact of ebv essential nuclear protein EBNA-3C on B-cell proliferation and apoptosis. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 323–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Maruo, S.; Wu, Y.; Ishikawa, S.; Kanda, T.; Iwakiri, D.; Takada, K. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein EBNA3C is required for cell cycle progression and growth maintenance of lymphoblastoid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 19500–19505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cai, Q.; Guo, Y.; Xiao, B.; Banerjee, S.; Saha, A.; Lu, J.; Glisovic, T.; Robertson, E.S. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C stabilizes gemin3 to block p53-mediated apoptosis. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Skalska, L.; White, R.E.; Franz, M.; Ruhmann, M.; Allday, M.J. Epigenetic repression of p16(INK4A) by latent Epstein-Barr virus requires the interaction of EBNA3A and EBNA3C with CTBP. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Krauer, K.G.; Burgess, A.; Buck, M.; Flanagan, J.; Sculley, T.B.; Gabrielli, B. The EBNA-3 gene family proteins disrupt the G2/M checkpoint. Oncogene 2004, 23, 1342–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Choudhuri, T.; Verma, S.C.; Lan, K.; Murakami, M.; Robertson, E.S. The ATM/ATR signaling effector CHK2 is targeted by Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C to release the G2/M cell cycle block. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 6718–6730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Parker, G.A.; Touitou, R.; Allday, M.J. Epstein-Barr virus EBNA3C can disrupt multiple cell cycle checkpoints and induce nuclear division divorced from cytokinesis. Oncogene 2000, 19, 700–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wade, M.; Allday, M.J. Epstein-Barr virus suppresses a G(2)/M checkpoint activated by genotoxins. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 20, 1344–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. White, R.E.; Groves, I.J.; Turro, E.; Yee, J.; Kremmer, E.; Allday, M.J. Extensive co-operation between the Epstein-Barr virus EBNA3 proteins in the manipulation of host gene expression and epigenetic chromatin modification. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Rapino, F.; Naumann, I.; Fulda, S. Bortezomib antagonizes microtubule-interfering drug-induced apoptosis by inhibiting G2/M transition and MCL-1 degradation. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hong, Y.S.; Hong, S.W.; Kim, S.M.; Jin, D.H.; Shin, J.S.; Yoon, D.H.; Kim, K.P.; Lee, J.L.; Heo, D.S.; Lee, J.S.; et al. Bortezomib induces G2-M arrest in human colon cancer cells through ROS-inducible phosphorylation of ATM-CHK1. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 41, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Bonvini, P.; Zorzi, E.; Basso, G.; Rosolen, A. Bortezomib-mediated 26S proteasome inhibition causes cell-cycle arrest and induces apoptosis in CD30+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Leukemia 2007, 21, 838–842. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Hui, K.F.; Leung, Y.Y.; Yeung, P.L.; Middeldorp, J.M.; Chiang, A.K. Combination of SAHA and bortezomib up-regulates CDKN2A and CDKN1A and induces apoptosis of Epstein-Barr virus-positive WP-restricted burkitt lymphoma and lymphoblastoid cell lines. Br. J. Haematol. 2014, 167, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Vaysberg, M.; Hatton, O.; Lambert, S.L.; Snow, A.L.; Wong, B.; Krams, S.M.; Martinez, O.M. Tumor-derived variants of Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induce sustained ERK activation and C-FOS. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 36573–36585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Morris, M.A.; Dawson, C.W.; Young, L.S. Role of the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein-1, LMP1, in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Future Oncol. 2009, 5, 811–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hui, K.F.; Lam, B.H.; Ho, D.N.; Tsao, S.W.; Chiang, A.K. Bortezomib and SAHA synergistically induce ROS-driven caspase-dependent apoptosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and block replication of Epstein-Barr virus. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 747–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zou, P.; Kawada, J.; Pesnicak, L.; Cohen, J.I. Bortezomib induces apoptosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B cells and prolongs survival of mice inoculated with ebv-transformed B cells. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 10029–10036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Leao, M.; Anderton, E.; Wade, M.; Meekings, K.; Allday, M.J. Epstein-Barr virus-induced resistance to drugs that activate the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint in burkitt’s lymphoma cells. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kelly, G.L.; Milner, A.E.; Tierney, R.J.; Croom-Carter, D.S.; Altmann, M.; Hammerschmidt, W.; Bell, A.I.; Rickinson, A.B. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2) gene deletion is consistently linked with EBNA3A, -3B and -3C expression in burkitt’s lymphoma cells and with increased resistance to apoptosis. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 10709–10717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Vereide, D.T.; Sugden, B. Lymphomas differ in their dependence on Epstein-Barr virus. Blood 2011, 117, 1977–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Picksley, S.M.; Vojtesek, B.; Sparks, A.; Lane, D.P. Immunochemical analysis of the interaction of p53 with MDM2—Fine mapping of the MDM2 binding site on p53 using synthetic peptides. Oncogene 1994, 9, 2523–2529. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Haupt, Y.; Maya, R.; Kazaz, A.; Oren, M. MDM2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 1997, 387, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shirley, C.M.; Chen, J.; Shamay, M.; Li, H.; Zahnow, C.A.; Hayward, S.D.; Ambinder, R.F. Bortezomib induction of C/EBPβ mediates Epstein-Barr virus lytic activation in burkitt lymphoma. Blood 2011, 117, 6297–6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fu, D.X.; Tanhehco, Y.; Chen, J.; Foss, C.A.; Fox, J.J.; Chong, J.M.; Hobbs, R.F.; Fukayama, M.; Sgouros, G.; Kowalski, J.; et al. Bortezomib-induced enzyme-targeted radiation therapy in herpesvirus-associated tumors. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 1118–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sarosiek, K.A.; Cavallin, L.E.; Bhatt, S.; Toomey, N.L.; Natkunam, Y.; Blasini, W.; Gentles, A.J.; Ramos, J.C.; Mesri, E.A.; Lossos, I.S. Efficacy of bortezomib in a direct xenograft model of primary effusion lymphoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 13069–13074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Granato, M.; Romeo, M.A.; Tiano, M.S.; Santarelli, R.; Gonnella, R.; Gilardini Montani, M.S.; Faggioni, A.; Cirone, M. Bortezomib promotes KHSV and EBV lytic cycle by activating JNK and autophagy. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hui, K.F.; Yeung, P.L.; Chiang, A.K. Induction of MAPK- and ROS-dependent autophagy and apoptosis in gastric carcinoma by combination of romidepsin and bortezomib. Oncotarget 2015, 7, 4454. [Google Scholar]
  73. Hui, K.F.; Chiang, A.K. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid induces viral lytic cycle in Epstein-Barr virus-positive epithelial malignancies and mediates enhanced cell death. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 2479–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hui, K.F.; Ho, D.N.; Tsang, C.M.; Middeldorp, J.M.; Tsao, G.S.; Chiang, A.K. Activation of lytic cycle of Epstein-Barr virus by suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid leads to apoptosis and tumor growth suppression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 131, 1930–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Choi, C.K.; Ho, D.N.; Hui, K.F.; Kao, R.Y.; Chiang, A.K. Identification of novel small organic compounds with diverse structures for the induction of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic cycle in EBV-positive epithelial malignancies. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Hui, K.F.; Cheung, A.K.; Choi, C.K.; Yeung, P.L.; Middeldorp, J.M.; Lung, M.L.; Tsao, S.W.; Chiang, A.K. Inhibition of class I histone deacetylases by romidepsin potently induces Epstein-Barr virus lytic cycle and mediates enhanced cell death with ganciclovir. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 138, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Pellom, S.T., Jr.; Dudimah, D.F.; Thounaojam, M.C.; Uzhachenko, R.V.; Singhal, A.; Richmond, A.; Shanker, A. Bortezomib augments lymphocyte stimulatory cytokine signaling in the tumor microenvironment to sustain CD8+ T cell antitumor function. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 8604–8621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jiang, G.M.; Wang, H.S.; Du, J.; Ma, W.F.; Wang, H.; Qiu, Y.; Zhang, Q.G.; Xu, W.; Liu, H.F.; Liang, J.P. Bortezomib relieves immune tolerance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via STAT1 suppression and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase downregulation. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2017, 5, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Pei, X.Y.; Dai, Y.; Grant, S. Synergistic induction of oxidative injury and apoptosis in human multiple myeloma cells by the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and histone deacetylase inhibitors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 3839–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Heider, U.; von Metzler, I.; Kaiser, M.; Rosche, M.; Sterz, J.; Rotzer, S.; Rademacher, J.; Jakob, C.; Fleissner, C.; Kuckelkorn, U.; et al. Synergistic interaction of the histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in mantle cell lymphoma. Eur. J. Haematol. 2008, 80, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Heider, U.; Rademacher, J.; Lamottke, B.; Mieth, M.; Moebs, M.; von Metzler, I.; Assaf, C.; Sezer, O. Synergistic interaction of the histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Eur. J. Haematol. 2009, 82, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Yu, C.; Rahmani, M.; Conrad, D.; Subler, M.; Dent, P.; Grant, S. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib interacts synergistically with histone deacetylase inhibitors to induce apoptosis in BCR/ABL+ cells sensitive and resistant to STI571. Blood 2003, 102, 3765–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, Q.L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.W.; Jiang, X.X.; Yang, F.; Wu, W.L.; Janin, A.; Chen, Z.; Shen, Z.X.; Chen, S.J.; et al. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib interacts synergistically with the histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid to induce T-leukemia/lymphoma cells apoptosis. Leukemia 2009, 23, 1507–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Emanuele, S.; Lauricella, M.; Carlisi, D.; Vassallo, B.; D’Anneo, A.; di Fazio, P.; Vento, R.; Tesoriere, G. SAHA induces apoptosis in hepatoma cells and synergistically interacts with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Apoptosis 2007, 12, 1327–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Denlinger, C.E.; Rundall, B.K.; Jones, D.R. Proteasome inhibition sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer to histone deacetylase inhibitor-induced apoptosis through the generation of reactive oxygen species. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004, 128, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sato, A.; Asano, T.; Ito, K.; Sumitomo, M. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) combined with bortezomib inhibits renal cancer growth by enhancing histone acetylation and protein ubiquitination synergistically. BJU Int. 2012, 109, 1258–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Miller, C.P.; Rudra, S.; Keating, M.J.; Wierda, W.G.; Palladino, M.; Chandra, J. Caspase-8 dependent histone acetylation by a novel proteasome inhibitor, NPI-0052: A mechanism for synergy in leukemia cells. Blood 2009, 113, 4289–4299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Nawrocki, S.T.; Carew, J.S.; Pino, M.S.; Highshaw, R.A.; Andtbacka, R.H.; Dunner, K., Jr.; Pal, A.; Bornmann, W.G.; Chiao, P.J.; Huang, P.; et al. Aggresome disruption: A novel strategy to enhance bortezomib-induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 3773–3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Marks, P.A. The mechanism of the anti-tumor activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Cell Cycle 2004, 3, 534–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Trachootham, D.; Alexandre, J.; Huang, P. Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: A radical therapeutic approach? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Hui, K.F.; Chiang, A.K. Combination of proteasome and class I HDAC inhibitors induces apoptosis of NPC cells through an HDAC6-independent ER stress-induced mechanism. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 135, 2950–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Liu, H.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Peng, H.; Fan, J.; Liao, J. Reactive oxygen species-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction contribute to polydatin-induced apoptosis in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma CNE cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2011, 112, 3695–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Quan, Z.; Gu, J.; Dong, P.; Lu, J.; Wu, X.; Wu, W.; Fei, X.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; et al. Reactive oxygen species-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction contribute to cirsimaritin-induced apoptosis in human gallbladder carcinoma GBC-SD cells. Cancer Lett. 2010, 295, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yu, J.S.; Kim, A.K. Platycodin D induces reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 activation and endoplasmic reticulum stress response in human breast cancer cells. J. Med. Food 2012, 15, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Nawrocki, S.T.; Carew, J.S.; Maclean, K.H.; Courage, J.F.; Huang, P.; Houghton, J.A.; Cleveland, J.L.; Giles, F.J.; McConkey, D.J. Myc regulates aggresome formation, the induction of NOXA and apoptosis in response to the combination of bortezomib and SAHA. Blood 2008, 112, 2917–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Brunk, U.T.; Dalen, H.; Roberg, K.; Hellquist, H.B. Photo-oxidative disruption of lysosomal membranes causes apoptosis of cultured human fibroblasts. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1997, 23, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chen, Y.; McMillan-Ward, E.; Kong, J.; Israels, S.J.; Gibson, S.B. Oxidative stress induces autophagic cell death independent of apoptosis in transformed and cancer cells. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kiffin, R.; Bandyopadhyay, U.; Cuervo, A.M. Oxidative stress and autophagy. Antioxid. Redox. Signal 2006, 8, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gutierrez, E.; Richardson, D.R.; Jansson, P.J. The anticancer agent Di-2-pyridylketone 4,4-dimethyl-3-thiosemicarbazone (DP44MT) overcomes prosurvival autophagy by two mechanisms: Persistent induction of autophagosome synthesis and impairment of lysosomal integrity. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 33568–33589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Chen, X.; Kamranvar, S.A.; Masucci, M.G. Oxidative stress enables Epstein-Barr virus-induced B-cell transformation by posttranscriptional regulation of viral and cellular growth-promoting factors. Oncogene 2016, 35, 3807–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Huang, S.Y.; Fang, C.Y.; Wu, C.C.; Tsai, C.H.; Lin, S.F.; Chen, J.Y. Reactive oxygen species mediate Epstein-Barr virus reactivation by N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e84919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Cao, J.Y.; Mansouri, S.; Frappier, L. Changes in the nasopharyngeal carcinoma nuclear proteome induced by the EBNA1 protein of Epstein-Barr virus reveal potential roles for ebna1 in metastasis and oxidative stress responses. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 382–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Cooper, A.; Johannsen, E.; Maruo, S.; Cahir-McFarland, E.; Illanes, D.; Davidson, D.; Kieff, E. EBNA3A association with RBP-Jκ down-regulates c-myc and Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblast growth. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Saha, A.; Bamidele, A.; Murakami, M.; Robertson, E.S. EBNA3C attenuates the function of p53 through interaction with inhibitor of growth family proteins 4 and 5. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 2079–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Anderton, E.; Yee, J.; Smith, P.; Crook, T.; White, R.E.; Allday, M.J. Two Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) oncoproteins cooperate to repress expression of the proapoptotic tumour-suppressor BIM: Clues to the pathogenesis of burkitt’s lymphoma. Oncogene 2008, 27, 421–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Paschos, K.; Smith, P.; Anderton, E.; Middeldorp, J.M.; White, R.E.; Allday, M.J. Epstein-Barr virus latency in B cells leads to epigenetic repression and CPG methylation of the tumour suppressor gene BIM. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Chinnadurai, G. CTBP, an unconventional transcriptional corepressor in development and oncogenesis. Mol. Cell 2002, 9, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Radkov, S.A.; Touitou, R.; Brehm, A.; Rowe, M.; West, M.; Kouzarides, T.; Allday, M.J. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C interacts with histone deacetylase to repress transcription. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 5688–5697. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  109. Knight, J.S.; Lan, K.; Subramanian, C.; Robertson, E.S. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C recruits histone deacetylase activity and associates with the corepressors MSIN3A and NCOR in human B-cell lines. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 4261–4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Boutros, R.; Lobjois, V.; Ducommun, B. CDC25 phosphatases in cancer cells: Key players? Good targets? Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Hermeking, H.; Benzinger, A. 14–3-3 proteins in cell cycle regulation. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2006, 16, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Harrison, S.J.; Bishton, M.; Bates, S.E.; Grant, S.; Piekarz, R.L.; Johnstone, R.W.; Dai, Y.; Lee, B.; Araujo, M.E.; Prince, H.M. A focus on the preclinical development and clinical status of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, romidepsin (depsipeptide, istodax®). Epigenomics 2012, 4, 571–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Moreau, P.; Richardson, P.G.; Cavo, M.; Orlowski, R.Z.; San Miguel, J.F.; Palumbo, A.; Harousseau, J.L. Proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma: 10 years later. Blood 2012, 120, 947–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Piekarz, R.L.; Frye, R.; Prince, H.M.; Kirschbaum, M.H.; Zain, J.; Allen, S.L.; Jaffe, E.S.; Ling, A.; Turner, M.; Peer, C.J.; et al. Phase 2 trial of romidepsin in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2011, 117, 5827–5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Bross, P.F.; Kane, R.; Farrell, A.T.; Abraham, S.; Benson, K.; Brower, M.E.; Bradley, S.; Gobburu, J.V.; Goheer, A.; Lee, S.L.; et al. Approval summary for bortezomib for injection in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 3954–3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Shi, L.; Fang, J. Implication of heme oxygenase-1 in the sensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinomas to radiotherapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 27, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Herndon, T.M.; Deisseroth, A.; Kaminskas, E.; Kane, R.C.; Koti, K.M.; Rothmann, M.D.; Habtemariam, B.; Bullock, J.; Bray, J.D.; Hawes, J.; et al. Food and drug administration approval: Carfilzomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 4559–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Shirley, M. Ixazomib: First global approval. Drugs 2016, 76, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 09 00352 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of exploitation of ubiquitin-proteasome system by gamma-herpesviruses and the development of cancer hallmarks. (a) Immunological evasion: GAr domain of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 or Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) central repeat (CR)1 of latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA)inhibits proteasome so as to prevent the proteolysis of EBNA-1 and the production of its antigenic peptides for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I presentation. BDLF3 promotes internalization and proteasomal degradation of MHC molecules. As a result, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are not able to detect and kill the latent viruses-infected cells. Replication and transcription activator (RTA) (KSHV) itself or through stabilization of RTA-associated ubiquitin ligase (RAUL) facilitates the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of interferon regulatory factor (IRF)3 and IRF7, which are important for innate immunity; (b) Deregulation of cell cycle: EBNA-3C can stably interact with pRb and recruit SKP1-Cul1-F-box protein (SCF)Skp2 E3-ubiquitin ligase to promote degradation of pRb. Thus, E2F is released and activates the transcription of cyclin-dependent kinases for cell cycle progression. Moreover, EBNA-3C also physically interacts with and degrades Bcl-6 through ubiquitin-specific protease (UPS) but the ligase that facilitates the ubiquitination is still under investigation. EBNA-3C interacts with Pim-1 which enhances the phosphorylation of p21WAF1 and promotes proteasomal degradation of p21WAF1. The association of SCFSkp2 with EBNA-3C or cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 with K/V cyclin (KSHV) increases phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation of p27KIP1. Additionally, stabilization of cyclin A by EBNA-3C also promotes degradation of p27KIP1 through UPS. In summary, gamma-herpesviruses possess multiple mechanisms to assist the infected cells to bypass cell cycle checkpoints for proliferation; (c) Inhibition of apoptosis: EBNA-1 displaces p53 in the interaction with ubiquitin-specific protease 7 (USP7), resulting in destabilization of p53 and its degradation by proteasome. On the other hand, MDM2 E3-ubiquitin ligase is recruited and stabilized by EBNA-3C or vIRF4 (KSHV), leading to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of p53. Viral interferon regulatory factor (vIRF)4 also inhibits the phosphorylation of p53 by ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase upon DNA damage response, causing destabilization and proteasomal degradation of p53.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of exploitation of ubiquitin-proteasome system by gamma-herpesviruses and the development of cancer hallmarks. (a) Immunological evasion: GAr domain of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 or Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) central repeat (CR)1 of latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA)inhibits proteasome so as to prevent the proteolysis of EBNA-1 and the production of its antigenic peptides for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I presentation. BDLF3 promotes internalization and proteasomal degradation of MHC molecules. As a result, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are not able to detect and kill the latent viruses-infected cells. Replication and transcription activator (RTA) (KSHV) itself or through stabilization of RTA-associated ubiquitin ligase (RAUL) facilitates the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of interferon regulatory factor (IRF)3 and IRF7, which are important for innate immunity; (b) Deregulation of cell cycle: EBNA-3C can stably interact with pRb and recruit SKP1-Cul1-F-box protein (SCF)Skp2 E3-ubiquitin ligase to promote degradation of pRb. Thus, E2F is released and activates the transcription of cyclin-dependent kinases for cell cycle progression. Moreover, EBNA-3C also physically interacts with and degrades Bcl-6 through ubiquitin-specific protease (UPS) but the ligase that facilitates the ubiquitination is still under investigation. EBNA-3C interacts with Pim-1 which enhances the phosphorylation of p21WAF1 and promotes proteasomal degradation of p21WAF1. The association of SCFSkp2 with EBNA-3C or cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 with K/V cyclin (KSHV) increases phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation of p27KIP1. Additionally, stabilization of cyclin A by EBNA-3C also promotes degradation of p27KIP1 through UPS. In summary, gamma-herpesviruses possess multiple mechanisms to assist the infected cells to bypass cell cycle checkpoints for proliferation; (c) Inhibition of apoptosis: EBNA-1 displaces p53 in the interaction with ubiquitin-specific protease 7 (USP7), resulting in destabilization of p53 and its degradation by proteasome. On the other hand, MDM2 E3-ubiquitin ligase is recruited and stabilized by EBNA-3C or vIRF4 (KSHV), leading to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of p53. Viral interferon regulatory factor (vIRF)4 also inhibits the phosphorylation of p53 by ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase upon DNA damage response, causing destabilization and proteasomal degradation of p53.
Viruses 09 00352 g001
Table
Table 1. Function of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) proteins affecting ubiquitin-proteasomal system.
Table 1. Function of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) proteins affecting ubiquitin-proteasomal system.
VirusesOncogenic Proteins/Molecules InvolvedProteins Processed by UPSMechanismsCell Function AffectedReferences
EBVBDLF3MHC I & IIPostulated E3 ligase for degradation of MHC molecules is not identified yetImmune evasion[18]
EBNA-1EBNA-1Inhibits proteasomal processing of EBNA-1 antigenic peptidesImmune evasion[16]
p53Interacts with USP7, leading to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradationApoptosis inhibition[33]
EBNA-3CpRbStabilizes cyclin D1/CDK6 and recruits SCFSkp2 E3-ubiquitin ligase to facilitate the proteasomal degradation of pRbCell cycle deregulation
(Bypass sub-G1 arrest)		[22,23]
p21WAF1Physically interacts with Pim-1 which in turn phosphorylates p21 and enhances poly-ubiquitination of p21 for degradationCell cycle deregulation
(Bypass G1 arrest)
Apoptosis inhibition		[24]
p27KIP1Enhances the phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation of p27KIP1 through SCFSkp2 E3-ubiquitin ligaseCell cycle deregulation
(Bypass G1 & G2/M arrest)		[25]
Bcl-6Interacts with Bcl-6 and promotes its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradationCell cycle deregulation
(Bypass G1 arrest)
Apoptosis inhibition
(release of Bcl-2)		[26]
p53Recruits and stabilizes MDM2 E3 ligase for proteasomal degradation of p53Apoptosis inhibition[34,66,67]
LMP-1p100Induces proteolysis of p100 to p52 through proteasome and activates non-canonical NF-κB pathwayApoptosis inhibition[32]
KSHVK/V cyclinp27KIP1Interacts with CDK6 and phosphorylates p27KIP1 for proteasomal degradationCell cycle deregulation
(Bypass G1 & G2/M arrest)		[29,30]
LANA (CR1 repeat)N/AInhibits proteasomal processing of LANA antigenic peptidesImmune evasion[17]
RTAIRF3 & IRF7Promotes proteasomal degradation of IRF3 & IRF7 directly or through stabilization of RAULImmune evasion[21]
vIRF4p53Inhibits phosphorylation of p53 by ATM and interacts with MDM2 to facilitate proteasomal degradation of p53Apoptosis inhibition[35,36]
MHC, major histocompatibility complex; EBNA, EBV nuclear antigen; USP, ubiquitin-specific protease; SCF, SKP1-Cul1-F-box protein; MDM2, mouse double minute 2; LANA, latency-associated nuclear antigen; CR, central repeat; RTA, replication and transcription activator; vIRF, viral interferon regulatory factor; IRF, interferon regulatory factor; RAUL, RTA-associated ubiquitin ligase; ATM, ataxia-telangiectasia mutated.
Table
Table 2. Proteasome inhibitors.
Table 2. Proteasome inhibitors.
Proteasome InhibitorTypeViral Protein AffectedLytic ReactivationClinical DevelopmentStructure
BortezomibBoronateEBNA-3C (combination with SAHA or romidepsin)EBV
KSHV
HSV-1		FDA-approved for MM, MCL and RRMM [39] Viruses 09 00352 i001
CarfilzomibEpoxyketoneN.D.EBVFDA-approved for RRMM [117] Viruses 09 00352 i002
IxazomibBoronateN.D.N.D.FDA-approved for RRMM
Phase I clinical trials in AML, follicular lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma [118]		 Viruses 09 00352 i003
Marizomibβ-lactoneN.D.N.D.Phase I clinical trials in RRMM, solid tumors and lymphoma Viruses 09 00352 i004
CEP-18770BoronateN.D.N.D.Phase I–II clinical trials in RRMM Viruses 09 00352 i005
ONX-0912EpoxyketoneN.D.N.D.Phase I clinical trials in haematological solid malignancies Viruses 09 00352 i006
SAHA, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; HSV, herpes simplex virus; FDA, the Food and Drug Administration; MM, multiple myeloma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; RRMM, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; N.D., not determined.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hui, K.F.; Tam, K.P.; Chiang, A.K.S. Therapeutic Strategies against Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Cancers Using Proteasome Inhibitors. Viruses 2017, 9, 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9110352

AMA Style

Hui KF, Tam KP, Chiang AKS. Therapeutic Strategies against Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Cancers Using Proteasome Inhibitors. Viruses. 2017; 9(11):352. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9110352

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hui, Kwai Fung, Kam Pui Tam, and Alan Kwok Shing Chiang. 2017. "Therapeutic Strategies against Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Cancers Using Proteasome Inhibitors" Viruses 9, no. 11: 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9110352

APA Style

Hui, K. F., Tam, K. P., & Chiang, A. K. S. (2017). Therapeutic Strategies against Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Cancers Using Proteasome Inhibitors. Viruses, 9(11), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9110352

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop