Next Article in Journal
Toward Synthetic Data Generation to Enhance Skidding Detection in Winter Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Adaptive Robust Path Tracking Control for Autonomous Vehicles Considering Multi-Dimensional System Uncertainty
Previous Article in Journal
Top-Down Validation Framework for Efficient and Low Noise Electric-Driven Vehicles with Multi-Speed Gearbox
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Active Suspension Control Based on Improved Fuzzy Neural Network PID
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Performance Enhancement of Vehicle Mechatronic Inertial Suspension, Employing a Bridge Electrical Network

1
School of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
Automotive Engineering Research Institute, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
3
College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World Electr. Veh. J. 2022, 13(12), 229; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13120229
Submission received: 29 October 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 1 December 2022

Abstract

:
Inerters, a new type of mass element, have been successfully applied in various fields, such as in automotive and civil engineering. The development of a new element, named a mechatronic inerter, which consists of a ball-screw inerter and permanent magnet electric machinery, proves the feasibility of adopting electrical element impedances to simulate corresponding mechanical elements. In this paper, the structures of the bridge electrical network and series-parallel electrical network and their impedance characteristics are first introduced. Then, a seven-degree-of-freedom vehicle model is established. In addition, by comparison with passive suspension, a bridge network and a series-parallel network with various basic topologies are used to improve the vibration isolation performance of mechatronic inertial suspension, and the advantages of the bridge network (a) are demonstrated. Finally, a bridge electrical network (a) was designed and a real vehicle test was carried out. The test results showed that the mechatronic inertial suspension based on the bridge network (a) was superior to the passive suspension; the RMS (root-mean-square) values of the suspension working space and dynamic tire load of the left rear wheel suspension were reduced by 21.1% and 6.3%, respectively; and the RMS value of the centroid acceleration was improved by 1.8%.

1. Introduction

Vehicle suspension has gradually developed from passive suspension with fixed parameters, to semi-active suspension with variable parameters [1], and active suspension with active control [2]. However, the suspension structure still utilizes a “spring–damper” system, which are connected in parallel, and the improvement of suspension performance has encountered a bottleneck. Since Smith proposed the inerter in 2002 [3], the inerter-based vibration suppression system has been a popular direction in mechanical fields and has successfully made up for a lack of inertial element and promoted the structural development of vehicle suspension. This article refers to suspension with an inerter as inertial suspension. With the rapid development of inertial suspension systems, the inerter has developed various implementation forms. Papageorgiou et al. introduced a rack-and-pinion inerter in 2009 [4], Faraj proposed a ball-screw inerter in 2019 [5], and Liu designed a hydraulic inerter in 2018 [6]. Other inerters have been proposed by scholars, such as a fluid inerter [7,8] and hydraulic electric inerter [9]. Inertial suspension performs better than passive suspension [10,11,12]. Moreover, an inerter can effectively improve the performance of mechanical vibration isolation systems [13,14,15,16]. To date, inertial suspension has been widely applied in train suspension [17,18], bridges [19,20], buildings [21,22], and robots [23].
With the appearance of inerters, electromechanical similarity theory has achieved a complete correspondence, where an inerter corresponds to a capacitor, a damper corresponds to a resistor, and a spring corresponds to an inductor [24]. Smith et al. improved suspension performance by optimizing suspension layouts with an inerter in 2004 [25]. The optimization was further carried out using linear matrix inequalities, and a synthesized passive network was realized by Bott-Duffin, which indicated that the system performance could be further improved by allowing higher order passive impedance [26]. However, network synthesis for a high-order impedance can be hard to realize mechanically. Therefore, Wang et al. proposed a mechatronic inerter, consisting of a ball-screw inerter and permanent magnet electric machinery in 2011 [27], and the system impedance was realized with the combination of mechanical and electrical networks.
The research on mechatronic inerters mainly focuses in two directions. One is the mechatronic inerter [28,29,30] and its external circuit [31,32]. Ning et al. introduced a new controllable electrically interconnected suspension based on a mechatronic inerter in 2020, which was composed of a controllable electrical network and two independent electromagnetic suspensions [33], and the results showed that the vertical vibration and roll performance of the vehicle could be improved by controlling the resistance of the electrical network. The other direction is the simplification of higher-order impedance and synthesis of passive networks [34,35]. Shen et al. used the structure-immittance approach to implement an optimal design methodology for mechatronic ISD (inerter–spring–damper) suspension in 2022, which ensured the simplicity of the suspension structure [36]. In summary, although a mechatronic inerter can utilize an external electrical network to simulate a target mechanical impedance and improve the performance of the suspension system, the external electrical network is complex. The problem of the simplest realization of high-order impedances remains to be studied.
A bridge network is a typical electrical circuit that is widely used in electrical theory. Unlike a series-parallel network, the bridge network is an non-series-parallel network that has a special connection method; to solve the impedance expression, the equivalent conversion of the Δ structure and the Y structure is required, and the bridge network is converted into a series and parallel network and calculated [37]. Then, the simplest realization of a biquad impedance of the bridge network is realized [38]. Moreover, the impedance expressions of different bridge networks have been discussed [39], and the results indicated that a bridge network can achieve a high-order impedance, with fewer components compared with Brune synthesis. Considering the large number of high-order impedance elements and the few studies on the simplification of high-order impedance, in this paper, a bridge network is used to simplify high-order impedance and apply it to mechatronic inertial suspension. Based on electromechanical similarity theory, the electrical network of mechatronic inertial suspension is studied. In summary, the bridge network is advantageous for improving the vibration isolation performance. This paper will concentrate on the performance enhancement of a vehicle mechatronic inertial suspension system using a bridge electrical network, to make full use of the advantages of mechatronic inertial suspension.
The following parts of this paper are organized as follows: Section 2 establishes a seven-degree-of-freedom vehicle model and analyzes three bridge networks and three series-parallel networks. The parameters of the proposed bridge networks and series-parallel networks are optimized in Section 3. In Section 4, the characteristics of the bridge network (a) are simulated and analyzed, as well as compared with a series-parallel network (d). Section 5 conducts reports test of a real vehicle. Finally, the summary and conclusions are presented in Section 6.

2. Model Building

2.1. Seven-Degree-of-Freedom Vehicle Model

In order to evaluate the influence of a bridge network on the performance of a vehicle, a seven-degree-of-freedom vehicle model is established in Figure 1. The front axle suspension adopts passive suspension. As the comfort of the rear passengers is very important, this paper applies mechatronic inertial suspension to the rear suspension system, and the mechatronic inerter is connected in series with a damper and then connected in parallel with a spring [40], as shown in Figure 1. The mechatronic inertial suspension is presented in Figure 2. The mechatronic inerter is connected to the damper in series, and the spring is connected to the mechatronic inerter and damper in parallel, when the mechatronic inerter is stimulated by vibration, the linear motion is converted into the rotating motion of the flywheel and motor through a ball screw. As shown in Figure 1.
The vertical motion equation at the center of mass of the vehicle body is:
m a Z ¨ a = F 10 + F 20 + F 30 + F 40
The roll motion equation of the vehicle body is:
I x θ ¨ = ( F 20 + F 40 F 10 F 30 ) d 2
The pitching motion equation of the vehicle body is:
I y φ ¨ = l 2 ( F 30 + F 40 ) l 1 ( F 10 + F 20 )
When the pitch angle and roll angle are small, the following relationship holds:
Z 10 = Z a l 1 φ d θ 2 Z 20 = Z a l 1 φ + d θ 2 Z 30 = Z a + l 2 φ d θ 2 Z 40 = Z a + l 2 φ + d θ 2
The vertical motion equation of the unsprung mass is:
m 1 Z ¨ 1 = K t ( Q 1 Z 1 ) F 10 m 2 Z ¨ 2 = K t ( Q 2 Z 2 ) F 20 m 3 Z ¨ 3 = K t ( Q 3 Z 3 ) F 30 m 4 Z ¨ 4 = K t ( Q 4 Z 4 ) F 40
The forces of the four suspensions are:
F 10 = k f ( Z 1 Z 10 ) + c f ( Z ˙ 1 Z ˙ 10 ) F 20 = k f ( Z 2 Z 20 ) + c f ( Z ˙ 2 Z ˙ 20 ) F 30 = k r ( Z 3 Z 30 ) + u 3 u 3 = b ( Z ¨ b 3 Z ¨ 30 ) + ( 2 π P ) 2 k t k e Z ( Z ˙ b 3 Z ˙ 30 ) = c r ( Z ˙ 3 Z ˙ b 3 ) F 40 = k r ( Z 4 Z 40 ) + u 4 u 4 = b ( Z ¨ b 4 Z ¨ 40 ) + ( 2 π P ) 2 k t k e Z ( Z ˙ b 4 Z ˙ 40 ) = c r ( Z ˙ 4 Z ˙ b 4 )
where ma is the sprung mass. m1, m2, m3, and m4 are the unsprung mass of the four suspensions, respectively. Kt is the equivalent stiffness of the tire. kf and cf are the spring stiffness and the damping coefficient of the front suspensions, respectively. kr and cr are the spring stiffness and the damping coefficient of rear suspensions, respectively. Z10, Z20, Z30, and Z40 are the vertical displacements of the connection between the vehicle body and the four suspensions. F10, F20, F30, and F40 are the forces of the four suspensions, respectively. Z1, Z2, Z3, and Z4 are the vertical displacements of four unsprung masses, respectively. Zb3 and Zb4 are the vertical displacements of the mechatronic inerter of the left rear suspension and the right rear suspension. Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 are the displacement inputs of the four wheels. Za is the vertical displacement of the sprung mass. θ is the body roll angle, and Ix is the body roll moment of inertia. φ is the body pitch angle, and Iy is the body pitch moment of inertia. l1 and l2 are the distance from the front axle and rear axle to the body centroid, respectively. d is the wheelbase, b is the inertial coefficient of the mechatronic inerter, and v is the vehicle speed. kt and ke are the inductive torque constant and the inductive voltage constant of the rotating motor, respectively. Z is the impedance of the external circuit of the rotating motor. u3 and u4 are the forces of the series branch of the mechatronic inerter and the damper, respectively. P is the lead of the ball screw.
In this paper, a real vehicle was used for the test, the simulation parameters refer to real vehicle data, and the main dimensional parameters of the vehicle were obtained according to the vehicle user manual, as shown in Table 1.

2.2. Bridge Network

Common bridge networks include a bridge rectifier circuit, half bridge circuit, full bridge circuit, wheatstone bridge, balanced bridge, and unbalanced bridge. The bridge network used in this paper was an unbalanced bridge circuit. The most common bridge network consists of five resistance elements, as shown in Figure 3a. And Figure 3b is the equivalent network.
Where R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 are resistors, T1, T2, and T3 are equivalent impedances.
In Figure 3, when the Δ structure of Figure 3a is transformed into the Y structure of Figure 3b, the equivalent transformation equation is:
T 1 = R 1 R 2 R 1 + R 2 + R 3 T 2 = R 1 R 3 R 1 + R 2 + R 3 T 3 = R 2 R 3 R 1 + R 2 + R 3
Therefore, the impedance expression of Figure 3a is:
Z = T 1 + T 2 + R 4 T 3 + R 5 T 2 + R 4 + T 3 + R 5
A bridge network composed of resistance, capacitance, and inductance has many kinds of structures. In this paper, the three most basic bridge networks are selected. Considering the special solution method of a bridge network, the selection principles of the bridge network studied in this paper were as follows. First of all, a resistor, a capacitor, and an inductor can constitute three kinds of Δ structures and three kinds of Y structures, respectively. Since the impedance of the resistance has no effect on the total impedance order [41], the remaining two elements of the bridge network are selected as resistors to form a five-element bridge network with three resistors, one capacitor, and one inductor, as shown in Figure 4.
According to the impedance transformation method shown in the Equation (8), the impedance transfer function of Figure 4a can be expressed as:
1 Z a ( s ) = A 1 s 4 + B 1 s 3 + C 1 s 2 + D 1 s + E 1 F 1 s 4 + G 1 s 3 + H 1 s 2 + I 1 s + J 1
A 1 = R 1 + R 2 + R 3 L 1 2 C 1 2 , B 1 = R 1 R 2 C 1 + R 1 R 3 C 1 + L 1 L 1 C 1 + R 1 + R 2 + R 3 R 1 L 1 C 1 2 , C 1 = R 1 R 2 C 1 + R 1 R 3 C 1 + L 1 R 1 C 1 + R 1 + 2 R 2 + 2 R 3 L 1 C 1 , D 1 = 2 R 1 C 1 R 2 + R 3 + L 1 , E 1 = R 2 + R 3 , F 1 = R 1 + R 2 R 3 L 1 2 C 1 2 , G 1 = R 1 + R 2 R 1 R 3 C 1 + L 1 L 1 C 1 + R 1 R 2 R 3 L 1 C 1 2 , H 1 = R 1 + R 2 + R 3 R 1 L 1 C 1 + R 1 + R 2 R 3 L 1 C 1 + R 1 R 3 C 1 + L 1 R 1 R 2 C 1 + R 2 R 3 L 1 C 1 , I 1 = R 1 R 2 C 1 + R 1 R 3 C 1 + L 1 R 1 + R 1 R 2 R 3 C 1 + R 1 R 3 C 1 + L 1 R 2 , J 1 = R 2 + R 3 R 1 + R 2 R 3 .
Similarly, it was calculated that the orders of the impedance transfer functions of the bridge network (b) and the bridge network (c) were also double fourth order, which will not be repeated here.

2.3. Series-Parallel Network

Correspondingly, three five-element series-parallel networks are shown in Figure 5.
From electrical knowledge, the impedances of the three series-parallel networks in Figure 5d–f were all of biquadratic order. With the same number of components, the bridge network can achieve a higher order impedance than the series-parallel network.

3. Optimization of the Inertial Suspension Parameters

In order to achieve the best performance of the mechatronic inertial suspension, the parameters of the suspension needed to be optimized. In this paper, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, which is suitable for multi-objective environments, was selected to optimize the structural parameters of the external electric circuit of the mechatronic inerter. The PSO algorithm is an intelligent optimization algorithm, whose basic idea is to initialize a group of random particles (random solutions) and find the optimal solution through iteration. The specific optimization process is shown in the Figure 6. To begin, the particle is initialized, the fit value of the particle is then compared with the best location it passes through, and the speed and position of the particle is updated. The process ends when the termination condition is met in each iteration, the particles update their position attributes by tracking the individual extremum and global extremum, and finally find the optimal particle [42]. The PSO algorithm has the advantages of fast search speed and memory, due to the need to adjust few parameters, so the structure is simple, and it is suitable for solving practical engineering problems. Particle velocities and positions are updated in accordance with the following two formulas:
V k + 1 = λ V k + d 1 r 1 ( P k i d X k ) + d 2 r 2 ( P k g d X k )
X k + 1 = X k + V k + 1
where λ is the inertia factor, its value affects the global and individual optimization ability. V is the velocity of the particle. X is the current position of the particle, and k is the current number of iterations. d1 and d2 are non-negative constants, called acceleration factors, and the general range is between 0 and 4. r1 and r2 are random numbers between (0, 1). Pid and Pgd are the individual extremum and global extremum, respectively.
This paper mainly studies the influence of the bridge network and the series-parallel network on the mechatronic inertial suspension, so three resistors (R1, R2, R3), one capacitor (C1), and one inductor (L1) of the external electrical circuit are taken as individuals to be solved. Moreover, the performance indicators have different units and orders of magnitude, so it is necessary to establish a unified objective function. The performance indexes of the mechatronic inertial suspension are divided by the corresponding indexes of the passive suspension, and the sum of their quotients is taken as the objective function. In this paper, f is the objective function of optimization, which is obtained by weighting the following parameters. The influence of different units of evaluation indexes is ignored; meanwhile, the improvement of suspension performance is studied by quantifying the objective function Therefore, the optimization of evaluation indexes of the ride comfort and the road friendliness is transformed into the minimum value problem of the unified objective function. The smaller the value of the optimization objective function, the better the optimization effect, and the performance improvement is obvious. In the optimization process, the road condition and running speed are set as C grade and 20 km/h, respectively, and the number of iterations is 100. Due to the mechatronic inertial suspension being used to replace the rear suspension system, the relevant evaluation indexes of the rear suspension are mainly used as the optimization objectives. The expression of the unified objective function and constraint conditions are as follows:
f = B A P B A pas + L R S W S P L R S W S pas + L R D T L P L R D T L pas + R R S W S P R R S W S pas + R R D T L P R R D T L pas
P = C 1 L 1 R 1 R 2 R 3
s . t . B A ( P ) < B A p a s s L R S W S P < L R S W S pas L R D T L ( P ) < L R D T L p a s s R R S W S P < R R S W S pas R R D T L ( P ) < R R D T L p a s s L M < P < U M
L M = [ 0 ,   0 ,   0 ,   0 ,   0 ] U M = [ 10 ,   100 ,   5000 ,   5000 ,   5000 ]
where BA(P), LRSWS(P), LRDTL(P), RRSWS(P), and RRDTL(P) indicate the root mean square (RMS) of the centroid acceleration, working space of the left rear wheel suspension, dynamic tire load of the left rear wheel, working space of the right rear wheel suspension, and dynamic tire load of the right rear wheel of the optimized mechatronic inertial suspension, respectively. The above parameters were used to evaluate the ride comfort and road friendliness of the vehicle. BApas, LRSWSpas, LRDTLpas, RRSWSpas, and RRDTLpas are the RMS of the corresponding performance indexes of the traditional passive suspension. P is the set of parameters to be optimized. LM and UM are the upper and lower bounds of these parameters, and these parameters will affect the handling stability of the vehicle.
After many iterations, the optimized parameters of the proposed bridge network and series-parallel network were revealed, as shown in Table 2.

4. Discussion

In this section, numerical simulations are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the mechatronic inertial suspension based on the bridge network (a).

4.1. Road Input

Assuming the vehicle is driving at a speed of u on a grade C road, the random road input is expressed as:
z ˙ r ( t ) = 0.111 [ u z r ( t ) + 40 G q ( n 0 ) u w ( t ) ]
where zr(t) is the vertical displacement of the random road input, w(t) is the white noise with mean value of 0, and Gq(n0) is the road roughness (2.56/104 m3).
In the simulation model, four road inputs were required. The random road input of the left front wheel is the same as that of the left rear wheel, but the random road inputs of left front wheel and right front wheel are slightly different. In addition, the time when the front wheel and the rear wheel receive the road input is different in the simulation process. Therefore, the wheelbase divided by the speed was the value of the delay in the simulation, and the left rear wheel and the right rear wheel have a delay compared with the left front wheel and the right front wheel, respectively.
In this paper, the road inputs of the left front wheel and the right front wheel are almost the same; thus, those of the left rear wheel and the right rear wheel are also virtually identical. To make this paper concise and clear, the centroid acceleration, vehicle body pitch angular acceleration, vehicle body roll angular acceleration, working spaces of the left front wheel suspension and the left rear wheel suspension, and the dynamic tire loads of the left front wheel and the left rear wheel were selected as the performance evaluation indexes.

4.2. Performance Analysis of Mechatronic Inertial Suspension

The parameters in Table 1 and Table 2 were input into the proposed mechatronic inertial suspension based on a bridge electrical network and a series-parallel electrical network for simulation. The vehicle speed was 20 m/s. The RMS values of performance indexes were obtained, as shown in Table 3 and Table 4.
From Table 3 and Table 4, it can be noted that among three mechatronic inertial suspensions based on the bridge network, the bridge network (a) had the best improvement in vehicle performance. Similarly, the series-parallel network (d) was the best in its group. Moreover, compared with the series-parallel network (d), the mechatronic inertial suspension based on the bridge network (a) had a greater effect on improving the performance of the vehicle. According to Section 2, it can be concluded that with the same number of electrical components, the bridge network could achieve a higher order impedance compared with the series-parallel network. Therefore, the bridge network (a) was selected as the external electrical network for the mechatronic inerter for the following part.

5. Experimental Research

To further validate the vibration isolation performance of the vehicle mechatronic inertial suspension system employing a bridge electrical network (a), a test of a real vehicle was carried out on the road.

5.1. Structure Selection and Real Vehicle Installation

The key components of mechatronic inerter include the ball–screw pair, flywheel, and rotating motor. The specific parameters were determined, as shown in Table 5.
After completing the parameter design of the ball–screw pair, flywheel, and rotating motor, a mechatronic inerter based on a bridge network (a) was developed and connected in series with the damper. Then they were installed in the rear suspension of the test vehicle, to prepare for the subsequent road test, to comprehensively analyze the performance advantages of a mechatronic inertial suspension based on a bridge network (a). In addition, three axis acceleration sensors, a PCB acceleration sensor, a SICK laser displacement sensor, and Siemens LMS Test Lab data acquisition instrument were used to collect the centroid acceleration, roll angular acceleration, pitch angular acceleration, suspension working space, and dynamic tire load signals of the test vehicle.
The test instruments and real vehicle test are shown in Figure 7.

5.2. Random Road Input

It was assumed that the test vehicle ran at a speed of 20 km/h on a C grade road. To ensure the consistency of the random road input, the test vehicle was tested on the same road section and ran along the white solid line of the road. The sampling interval was 0.005 s, and the sampling time was 10 s. The result of time domain is shown in Figure 8 and Table 6.
It can be seen from Table 6 and Figure 8 that, compared with the passive suspension, the RMS values of centroid acceleration and vehicle body roll angular acceleration of the mechatronic inertial suspension based on a bridge network (a) were reduced by 1.8% and 5.5%, respectively. While, the RMS values of the suspension working space and dynamic tire load of the left rear suspension, comparing the passive suspension with the mechatronic inertial suspension based on a bridge network (a), were decreased by 21.1% and 6.3%. The above improvements improved the ride comfort of the vehicle. However, the RMS value of vehicle body pitch angular acceleration was increased by 4.9%, and this increase of vehicle body pitch angular acceleration made vehicle handling stability slightly worse. Meanwhile, considering that only the rear suspension system adopted the proposed mechatronic inertial suspension based on a bridge network, it was found that the RMS values of the suspension working space and dynamic tire load of the left front suspension were improved by 2.5% and 2.2%, respectively, which is less than the improvement effect of the rear suspension system. It can be concluded from the above results that the bridge network (a) could improve the ride comfort of the vehicle, but the effect was not sufficiently significant, and the handling stability was not improved.

5.3. Pulse Road Input

A comparison of the peak value of performance indexes with a pulse road input and when the vehicle speed was 20 km/h is shown in Table 7 and Figure 9.
From Table 7 and Figure 9, we can see that, for the centroid acceleration, the improvement of the peak to peak of the mechatronic inertial suspension based on the bridge network (a) was much small than that of the passive suspension, from 7.2110 (m·s−2) to 7.1722 (m·s−2), which is only 0.5% and helped to improve the vehicle ride comfort. However, for the vehicle body roll angular acceleration, the improvement was apparent, from 4.9686 (rad·s−2) to 4.5532 (rad·s−2), and the degree of reduction was 8.4%. For the vehicle body pitch angular acceleration, the peak to peak of the mechatronic inertial suspension was relatively higher than that of the passive suspension, which increased from 9.6225 (rad·s−2) to 10.1903 (rad·s−2) (5.9%), and there was no improvement in the vehicle handling stability. The peak to peak values of the suspension working space and dynamic tire load of the left front suspension, comparing the passive suspension with the mechatronic inertial suspension based on a bridge network (a), were reduced by 2.3% and 2.2%, respectively. The performance improvement of the left rear suspension was obvious compared to the left front suspension. The suspension working space decreased from 0.1234 (m) to 0.1008 (m) (18.3%), and the dynamic tire load decreased from 7047 (N) to 6568 (N) (6.8%). These improvements helped to improve the vehicle ride comfort and road friendliness.
In summary, the proposed mechatronic inertial suspension based on a bridge network (a) can better realize a high-order suspension impedance and has better working performance, to effectively improve the ride comfort and vibration isolation performance of vehicles.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, the optimal design of mechatronic inertial suspension with an external electrical network was studied. First, an optimization design method of the external circuit of vehicle mechatronic inertial suspension was proposed using a bridge network. Then, a whole-vehicle dynamic model, considering the vertical motion, roll motion, and pitch motion of vehicle body, was established, and the basic structure and impedance transfer function of the bridge network and series-parallel network were analyzed. The particle swarm optimization algorithm was used to optimize component parameters of three bridge networks and three series-parallel networks. Then, a performance comparison and analysis of the mechatronic inertial suspension using a bridge network and series-parallel network was studied, and the bridge network (a) and series parallel-network (d) were selected. On this basis, the bridge network (a) and series-parallel network (d) were compared in the time domain and frequency domain, and the bridge network (a) with better vibration suppression ability was selected as the electrical network for the mechatronic inerter. Finally, a road test with a real vehicle was carried out with a random road input and pulse road input, respectively.
The results show that, under the random input condition, compared with the passive suspension, the mechatronic inertial suspension based on a bridge network (a) could reduce the RMS value of centroid acceleration by 1.8%, the RMS value of the body roll angular acceleration by 5.5%, and the RMS values of the suspension working space and dynamic tire load of the left rear wheel suspension by 21.1% and 6.3%, respectively, which effectively improved the ride comfort of the vehicle.
This article provides a research direction for the passive optimization design of mechatronic inertial suspension and verified its effectiveness and feasibility, laying the foundation for further improvements of the vibration isolation of vehicle mechatronic inertial suspension.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y.; methodology, Y.S.; software, T.Z.; validation, X.L.; formal analysis, T.H.; investigation, T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.S.; supervision, X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 52072157 and 52002156, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under Grant BK20200911 and Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality under Grant 3214045.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and helpful comments.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest are reported by the authors.

References

  1. Lee, D.; Jin, S.W.; Rhee, E.-J.; Lee, C. Practical Damper Velocity Estimation for Semi-Active Suspension Control. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 2021, 22, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, G.-W.; Hyun, M.; Kang, D.-O.; Heo, S.-J. High-efficiency Active Suspension based on Continuous Damping Control. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 2022, 23, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Smith, M. Synthesis of mechanical networks: The inerter. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 2002, 47, 1648–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Papageorgiou, C.; Houghton, N.E.; Smith, M.C. Experimental testing and analysis of inerter devices. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control.-Trans. Asme 2009, 131, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Faraj, R.; Jankowski, L.; Graczykowski, C.; Holnicki-Szulc, J. Can the inerter be a successful shock-absorber? The case of a ball-screw inerter with a variable thread lead. J. Frankl. Inst. 2019, 356, 7855–7872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, X.; Jiang, J.Z.; Titurus, B.; Harrison, A. Model identification methodology for fluid-based inerters. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 106, 479–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Swift, S.J.; Smith, M.C.; Glover, A.R.; Papageorgiosu, C.; Gartner, B.; Houghton, N.E. Design and modelling of a fluid inerter. Int. J. Control. 2013, 86, 2035–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shen, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X. Modeling and Optimization of Vehicle Suspension Employing a Nonlinear Fluid Inerter. Shock Vib. 2016, 2016, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhang, H.; Shen, Y.; Yang, H. Impact of coil factors on a hydraulic electric inerter based vehicle suspension. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 2020, 58, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, X.; Song, H.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Y.; He, T. Control of the Vehicle Inertial Suspension Based on the Mixed Skyhook and Power-Driven-Damper Strategy. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 217473–217482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Li, F.; Shang, D. Dynamic Characteristics Analysis of ISD Suspension System under Different WoSrking Conditions. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, Z.; Zhang, R.; Wierschem, N.E.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, C. Displacement mitigation-oriented design and mechanism for inerter-based isolation system. J. Vib. Control. 2021, 27, 1991–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shi, A.; Shen, Y.; Wang, J. Parameter optimization of a grounded dynamic vibration absorber with lever and inerter. J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Act. Control 2022, 41, 784–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, R.F.; Zhao, Z.P.; Liu, X.C.; Zhang, L.X. Optimal design of inerter systems for the force-transmission suppression of oscillating structures. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 2022, 21, 441–454. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dai, J.; Wang, Y.; Wei, M.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, J.; Jin, H.; Jiang, C. Dynamic characteristic analysis of the inerter-based piecewise vibration isolator under base excitation. Acta Mech. 2022, 233, 513–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lewis, T.D.; Jiang, J.Z.; Neild, S.A.; Gong, C.N.; Iwnicki, S.D. Using an inerter-based suspension to improve both passenger comfort and track wear in railway vehicles. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2020, 58, 472–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xia, Z.H.; Zhou, J.S.; Lian, J.Y.; Ding, S.; Gong, D.; Sun, W.; Sun, Y. Online detection and control of car body low-frequency swaying in railway vehicles. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2021, 59, 70–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Li, H.X.; Meng, H.D.; Wang, Y. Dynamic characteristics of an underframe inerter-based suspended equipment for high speed trains. J. Vib. Shock. 2022, 41, 246–254. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, H.; Ye, Z.; Chen, X.; Yao, W. Seismic response mitigation of girder displacement of cable-stayed bridge using inerter systems. Structures 2022, 39, 928–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, K.; Bi, K.; Han, Q.; Li, X.; Du, X. Using tuned mass damper inerter to mitigate vortex-induced vibration of long-span bridges: Analytical study. Eng. Struct. 2019, 182, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Z.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, R.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, C. A negative stiffness inerter system (NSIS) for earthquake protection purposes. Smart Struct. Syst. 2020, 26, 481–493. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, Z. Optimal design and effectiveness evaluation for inerter-based devices on mitigating seismic responses of base isolated structures. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 2021, 20, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, S.; He, B. A compliance modeling method of flexible rotary joint for collaborative robot using passive network synthesis theory. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2021, 236, 4038–4048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, X.; He, T.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yan, L. Research on predictive coordinated control of ride comfort and road friendliness for heavy vehicle ISD suspension based on the hybrid-hook damping strategy. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Smith, M.C.; Wang, F.-C. Performance Benefits in Passive Vehicle Suspensions Employing Inerters. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2004, 42, 235–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Papageorgiou, C.; Smith, M. Positive real synthesis using matrix inequalities for mechanical networks: Application to vehicle suspension. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2006, 14, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, F.-C.; Chan, H.-A. Vehicle suspensions with a mechatronic network strut. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2011, 49, 811–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. López-Martínez, J.; Martínez, J.; García-Vallejo, D.; Alcayde, A.; Montoya, F.G. A new electromechanical analogy approach based on electrostatic coupling for vertical dynamic analysis of planar vehicle models. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 119492–119502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, M.Z.; Papageorgiou, C.; Scheibe, F.; Wang, F.-C.; Smith, M.C. The missing mechanical circuit element. IEEE Circuits Syst. Mag. 2009, 9, 10–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Y.A.; Cheng, Z.; Hu, N.Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhuo, X. Modeling, design and experiments of a ball-screw inerter with mechanical diodes. J. Sound Vib. 2021, 504, 116121. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, X.; Yan, L.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, C. Optimal Design and Dynamic Control of an ISD Vehicle Suspension Based on an ADD Positive Real Network. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 94294–94306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shen, Y.; Hua, J.; Fan, W.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Chen, L. Optimal design and dynamic performance analysis of a fractional-order electrical network-based vehicle mechatronic ISD suspension. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2023, 184, 2592–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ning, D.; Du, H.; Zhang, N.; Sun, S.; Li, W. Controllable Electrically Interconnected Suspension System for Improving Vehicle Vibration Performance. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2020, 25, 859–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, Y.L.; Chen, M.Z.Q. Low-complexity passive vehicle suspension design based on element-number-restricted networks and low-order admittance networks. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control.-Trans. Asme 2018, 140, 101014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y.; Yang, X.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W. Optimal design and dynamic control of the HMDV inertial suspension based on the ground-hook positive real network. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2022, 171, 103171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shen, Y.; Hua, J.; Wu, B.; Chen, Z.; Xiong, X.; Chen, L. Optimal design of the vehicle mechatronic ISD suspension system using the structure-immittance approach. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 2022, 236, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhong, R.; Bi, C.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, A.; Yang, Z.; Zhai, J. A Simplified Method for Extracting Parasitic Inductances of MOSFET-Based Half-Bridge Circuit. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 14122–14129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Advani, J.; Gupta, O. Networks for a Subclass of Minimum Biquartic Impedance Functions. IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory 1965, 12, 621–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, S.; Frisch, I. A Class of RLC Networks with Fewer Nonreactive Elements than the Brune Realization. IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory 1964, 11, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, X.F.; Song, H.; Shen, Y.J.; Liu, Y.L. Study on adverse effect suppression of hub motor driven vehicles with inertial suspensions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 2022, 236, 767–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, F.C.; Chan, H.A. Mechatronic Suspension Design and Its Applications to Vehicle Suspension Control. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control. 2008, 12, 3769–3774. [Google Scholar]
  42. Clerc, M.; Kennedy, J. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2002, 6, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Seven-degree-of-freedom vehicle model.
Figure 1. Seven-degree-of-freedom vehicle model.
Wevj 13 00229 g001
Figure 2. Mechatronic inertial suspension.
Figure 2. Mechatronic inertial suspension.
Wevj 13 00229 g002
Figure 3. (a). bridge network consists of five resistance elements. (b). Equivalent network of the bridge network.
Figure 3. (a). bridge network consists of five resistance elements. (b). Equivalent network of the bridge network.
Wevj 13 00229 g003
Figure 4. (ac) are five-element bridge networks of three different structures.
Figure 4. (ac) are five-element bridge networks of three different structures.
Wevj 13 00229 g004
Figure 5. (df) are five-element series-parallel networks of three different structures.
Figure 5. (df) are five-element series-parallel networks of three different structures.
Wevj 13 00229 g005
Figure 6. Parameter optimization flow chart.
Figure 6. Parameter optimization flow chart.
Wevj 13 00229 g006
Figure 7. Test instruments and real vehicle test.
Figure 7. Test instruments and real vehicle test.
Wevj 13 00229 g007
Figure 8. Performance comparison under random road conditions with a vehicle speed of 20 km/h.
Figure 8. Performance comparison under random road conditions with a vehicle speed of 20 km/h.
Wevj 13 00229 g008aWevj 13 00229 g008b
Figure 9. Comparison diagram with a pulse road input with a vehicle speed of 20 km/h.
Figure 9. Comparison diagram with a pulse road input with a vehicle speed of 20 km/h.
Wevj 13 00229 g009aWevj 13 00229 g009b
Table 1. Main parameters of the vehicle model.
Table 1. Main parameters of the vehicle model.
ParametersSymbolUnitValue
Sprung massmakg1659
Unsprung mass of left and right front wheelsm1, m2kg47.5
Unsprung mass of left and right rear wheelsm3, m4kg42.5
Spring stiffness of front axle suspension kfkN·m−125
Spring stiffness of rear axle suspension krkN·m−122
Damping coefficient of front axle suspensioncfkN·s·m−11.8
Damping coefficient of rear axle suspensioncrkN·s·m−11.5
Equivalent stiffness of tireKtkN·m−1192
Distance from front axle to body centroidl1m1.28
Distance from rear axle to body centroidl2m1.43
Wheelbasedm1.62
Inertance of rear suspensionbkg308
Body roll moment of inertiaIxkg·m21088
Body pitch moment of inertiaIykg·m23032
Table 2. Optimized parameters of the electrical network.
Table 2. Optimized parameters of the electrical network.
ParametersBridge NetworkSeries-Parallel Network
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)
Capacitance C1 (mF)838.46.32.57.5
Inductance L1 (mH)18.817.53.51613.715
Resistance R1 (Ω)29082553857297628562598
Resistance R2 (Ω)298428243000276827082714
Resistance R3 (Ω)299229961350274821582944
Table 3. RMS comparison of mechatronic inertial suspension based on the bridge network.
Table 3. RMS comparison of mechatronic inertial suspension based on the bridge network.
Suspension Performance IndexPassive SuspensionBridge Network
(a)(b)(c)
RMS of centroid acceleration (m·s−2)1.87921.79021.80231.8010
RMS of body roll angular acceleration (rad·s−2)0.10590.10440.10370.1037
RMS of body pitch angular acceleration (rad·s−2)1.38271.34401.35321.3539
RMS of working space of left front suspension (m)0.02660.02560.02570.0257
RMS of dynamic tire load of left front wheel (kN)1.92871.86651.87811.8781
RMS of working space of left rear suspension (m)0.02710.02010.02020.0203
RMS of dynamic tire load of left rear wheel (kN)1.89071.73891.74971.7495
Table 4. RMS comparison of mechatronic inertial suspension based on the series-parallel network.
Table 4. RMS comparison of mechatronic inertial suspension based on the series-parallel network.
Suspension Performance IndexPassive SuspensionSeries-Parallel Network
(d)(e)(f)
RMS of centroid acceleration (m·s−2)1.87921.83541.83781.8446
RMS of body roll angular acceleration (rad·s−2)0.10590.11310.11250.1125
RMS of body pitch angular acceleration (rad·s−2)1.38271.45711.45911.4642
RMS of working space of left front suspension (m)0.02660.02530.02520.0254
RMS of dynamic tire load of left front wheel (kN)1.92871.84441.84411.8528
RMS of working space of left rear suspension (m)0.02710.02290.02330.0230
RMS of dynamic tire load of left rear wheel (kN)1.89071.78551.78971.7935
Table 5. Parameters of the key components.
Table 5. Parameters of the key components.
ParameterValueParameterValue
Nominal shaft diameter d0 (mm)16Rated power P (W)2000
Lead P (mm)5Rated speed ne (r·min−1)3000
Center distance of balls on both sides dp (mm)16.75Maximum speed nm (r·min−1)6000
Groove diameter dc (mm)13.5Rated torque Te (N·m)5.88
Number of columns × Number of turns1 × 2.65Rated voltage Ue (V)310
Effective stroke l0 (mm)120Rated current Ie (A)6
Lead screw stiffness kl (N·μm−1)130Inductive torque constant kt (N·m/A)0.98
Dynamic rated load ca (kN)5.4Inductive voltage constant ke (V·s/rad)0.98
Static rated load coa (kN)13.3Allowable stress σp (N·mm−2)150
Dynamic load coefficient ks2Radius of flywheel r (mm)30
Static load coefficient kd3Thickness of flywheel h (mm)20
Table 6. Performance index with a random input.
Table 6. Performance index with a random input.
Performance IndexRMS of Passive SuspensionBridge Network (a)
RMSImprovement (%)
Centroid acceleration (m·s−2)1.26561.24281.8
Vehicle body roll angular acceleration (rad·s−2)1.11391.05265.5
Vehicle body pitch angular acceleration (rad·s−2)0.44260.4643−4.9
Working space of left front suspension (m)0.01420.01382.5
Dynamic tire load of left front wheel (N)102210002.2
Working space of left rear suspension (m)0.01450.011421.1
Dynamic tire load of left rear wheel (N)9819196.3
Table 7. Performance index with a pulse road input.
Table 7. Performance index with a pulse road input.
Performance IndexPeak to Peak of Passive SuspensionBridge Network (a)
Peak to PeakImprovement
(%)
Centroid acceleration (m·s−2)7.21107.17220.5
Vehicle body roll angular acceleration (rad·s−2)4.96864.55328.4
Vehicle body pitch angular acceleration (rad·s−2)9.622510.1903-5.9
Working space of left front suspension (m)0.11280.11022.3
Dynamic tire load of left front wheel (N)720070382.2
Working space of left rear suspension (m)0.12340.100818.3
Dynamic tire load of left rear wheel (N)704765686.8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, T.; Yang, X.; Shen, Y.; Liu, X.; He, T. Performance Enhancement of Vehicle Mechatronic Inertial Suspension, Employing a Bridge Electrical Network. World Electr. Veh. J. 2022, 13, 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13120229

AMA Style

Zhang T, Yang X, Shen Y, Liu X, He T. Performance Enhancement of Vehicle Mechatronic Inertial Suspension, Employing a Bridge Electrical Network. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2022; 13(12):229. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13120229

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Tianyi, Xiaofeng Yang, Yujie Shen, Xiaofu Liu, and Tao He. 2022. "Performance Enhancement of Vehicle Mechatronic Inertial Suspension, Employing a Bridge Electrical Network" World Electric Vehicle Journal 13, no. 12: 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13120229

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop