Next Article in Journal
Speech Perception in Noise in Normally Hearing Children: Does Binaural Frequency Modulated Fitting Provide More Benefit than Monaural Frequency Modulated Fitting?
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Vibrant Soundbridge Implantation and 2nd Stage Auricular Reconstruction for Microtia with Aural Atresia
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions: Body Position Effects with Simultaneous Presentation of Tone Pairs

by
Samuel R. Atcherson
1,* and
Amy Mattheis
2
1
Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
2
Department of Communication Disorders, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2011, 1(2), e29; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2011.e29
Submission received: 22 September 2011 / Revised: 8 November 2011 / Accepted: 8 November 2011 / Published: 9 November 2011

Abstract

This study examined the effect of three different body positions on distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitude and noise levels with multiple primary tone pairs simultaneously-presented to 36 normal-hearing female human adults. Other studies have demonstrated that the simultaneously presented tone pairs method shows clinical promise as a screener, but the sequential method remains in widespread clinical use. Postural changes have been suggested to have an effect not only on DPOAEs, but also transient-evoked OAEs and stimulus- frequency OAEs. DPOAE amplitude and noise levels were recorded in seated, supine, and side-lying positions to the following order of simultaneously-presented tone pairs relative to the f2 frequencies: 1187, 2375, and 4812 Hz; 1500, 3000, and 6062 Hz; and 1875, 3812, and 7625 Hz. No DPOAE could be detected reliably at 7625 Hz as result of poor signal-to-noise ratio. For remaining DPOAEs, statistical analyses revealed that amplitudes were not significantly different among the three body positions. However, at 1500 Hz and below, body position did have a statistically significant effect on noise levels though they are likely clinically negligible. Except at 7625 Hz, results suggest that DPOAEs recorded using a simultaneously presented tone pairs appear to be comparably recorded regardless of an individual’s body position.
Keywords: distortion-product otoacoustic emissions; simultaneous; multiple-tone pair stimuli; body position distortion-product otoacoustic emissions; simultaneous; multiple-tone pair stimuli; body position

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Atcherson, S.R.; Mattheis, A. Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions: Body Position Effects with Simultaneous Presentation of Tone Pairs. Audiol. Res. 2011, 1, e29. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2011.e29

AMA Style

Atcherson SR, Mattheis A. Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions: Body Position Effects with Simultaneous Presentation of Tone Pairs. Audiology Research. 2011; 1(2):e29. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2011.e29

Chicago/Turabian Style

Atcherson, Samuel R., and Amy Mattheis. 2011. "Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions: Body Position Effects with Simultaneous Presentation of Tone Pairs" Audiology Research 1, no. 2: e29. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2011.e29

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop