Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
Audiology ResearchAudiology Research
  • Reply
  • Open Access

14 August 2023

Reply to Aldè et al. Comment on “Manchaiah et al. Social Representations of “Tinnitus” and “Health” among Individuals with Tinnitus Seeking Online Psychological Interventions. Audiol. Res. 2023, 13, 207–220”

,
and
1
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
2
UCHealth Hearing and Balance, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
3
Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative Initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine and University of Pretoria, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
4
Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Gauteng, South Africa
We would like to thank Dr. Aldè and his colleuage’s for their thoughtful comments [1] regarding our recent publication “Social representations of “tinnitus” and “health” among individuals with tinnitus seeking online psychological interventions” [2].
Dr. Aldè and colleagues’ comment about the relatively small sample size in the study (n = 399) for a social representation study is valid. However, there is no statistical methodology for estimating the sample size for such studies. Also, considering the exploratory nature of the published study, we think that the sample size was reasonable. However, we fully agree that repeating the study with a larger sample size (n > 1000) as well as with appropriate sampling method would yield results that are more generalizable.
The study was secondary analysis of data gathered during clinical trials [3,4,5]. For this reason, we only included participants who were seeking online psychological interventions. However, as acknowledged in our study limitations, this population may not be a good representation of the clinical population that we see as well as all those who experience tinnitus. For this reason, the study results must be viewed with caution. We also agree that future research on this topic should be performed on clinical sample.
The study was conducted completely online without any in-person consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, we do not have details on participants clinical variables such as hearing status (pure-tone audiometry results), hearing device use and other medical conditions. To ensure that the study participants did not have huge burden of completing online questionnaires, we kept the questionnaire data collection limited to key demographics and outcome measures necessary for the clinical trials. We have discussed the participants characters based on these in the social representation study [2] as well as on our clinical trials [3,4,5]. However, we fully agree that having a complete picture of participants clinical and health variables could have provided much better understanding.
We highly appreciate Dr. Aldè and his colleague’s thoughtful comments on this manuscript. We will keep these comments in mind when designing the future studies in this area of study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation, V.M.; writing—review and editing, E.W.B. and P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aldè, M.; Iannella, G.; Lechien, J.R.; Simon, F.; Maniaci, A. Comment on Manchaiah et al. Social Representations of “Tinnitus” and “Health” among Individuals with Tinnitus Seeking Online Psychological Interventions. Audiol. Res. 2023, 13, 207–220. Audiol. Res. 2023, 13, 651–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Manchaiah, V.; Chundu, S.; Ratinaud, P.; Andersson, G.; Beukes, E.W. Social Representations of “Tinnitus” and “Health” among Individuals with Tinnitus Seeking Online Psychological Interventions. Audiol. Res. 2023, 13, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Beukes, E.W.; Andersson, G.; Fagelson, M.; Manchaiah, V. Audiologist-Supported Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Tinnitus in the United States: A Pilot Trial. Am. J. Audiol. 2021, 30, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Beukes, E.W.; Andersson, G.; Fagelson, M.A.; Manchaiah, V. Internet-based audiologist-guided cognitive behavioral therapy tinnitus in the United States: A randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2022, 24, e27584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Beukes, E.W.; Andersson, G.; Fagelson, M.A.; Manchaiah, V. Dismantling internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for tinnitus. The contribution of applied relaxation: A randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv. 2021, 25, 100402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.