Next Article in Journal
Item Response Theory Applied to Factors Affecting the Patient Journey towards Hearing Rehabilitation
Previous Article in Journal
New Treatment Strategy for Apogeotropic Horizontal Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery

1
Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Bloomsbury University of Pennsylvania, USA
2
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2016, 6(2), 158; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.158
Submission received: 1 July 2016 / Revised: 26 September 2016 / Accepted: 27 September 2016 / Published: 25 November 2016

Simple Summary

c

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify how the use of two different cutoff criteria affects the test failure rate and potential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorder ([C]APD) in a sample of children subjected to central auditory processing ([C]AP) assessment. Test failure rates for the central test battery (CTB) using two different cutoff criteria (1 and 2 SDs below the mean) were measured retrospectively for 98 children who completed (C)AP assessment. The rates of potential (C)APD diagnosis ranged from 86.8% [when a 1 standard deviation (SD) cutoff was used] to 66.2% (when a 2 SD cutoff was used). The current use of two different cutoffs for the CTB has a large impact on the diagnostic rate for (C)APD. These findings have clinical implications for the diagnosis of (C)APD due to the widespread use of the CTB in the United States for the assessment of (C)APD in children. Thus, it is important to create awareness among audiologists that use of the 2 SDs cutoff criterion is recommended for reducing false positives (error).
Keywords: central test battery; auditory processing disorder; cutoff criteria central test battery; auditory processing disorder; cutoff criteria

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shaikh, M.A.; Fox-Thomas, L.; Tucker, D. Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery. Audiol. Res. 2016, 6, 158. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.158

AMA Style

Shaikh MA, Fox-Thomas L, Tucker D. Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery. Audiology Research. 2016; 6(2):158. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shaikh, Mohsin Ahmed, Lisa Fox-Thomas, and Denise Tucker. 2016. "Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery" Audiology Research 6, no. 2: 158. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.158

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop