Next Article in Journal
Present but Absent—Nurses’ Experiences of How a Hospital Design with Only Single Bedrooms and the Technological Shift Affect Nursing
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Pain, Threat Perception and Emotional Distress on Suicide Risk in Individuals with Colorectal Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distanced Large Group Simulations as a Learning Method for Interprofessional Collaboration

by
Marja Silén-Lipponen
1,*,
Eija Piippo-Savolainen
2,3,
Mina Azimirad
4 and
Terhi Saaranen
4
1
Unit of Health Care, Savonia University of Applied Sciences, 70201 Kuopio, Finland
2
Pediatrics Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
3
Department of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
4
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Science, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), 70211 Kuopio, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nurs. Rep. 2024, 14(4), 2640-2650; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040195
Submission received: 19 July 2024 / Revised: 12 September 2024 / Accepted: 24 September 2024 / Published: 26 September 2024

Abstract

Digitalization in healthcare education has shifted simulation learning methods to distanced implementations. Successful transition to distance education requires effective communication and the teacher’s good ability to use digital learning methods, as well as students’ active interaction and motivation throughout the entire educational process. This study explores participants’ experiences of online large group simulations as an approach for learning about interprofessional collaboration. A mixed method design was used in this study. Data from health and social care students and qualified professionals were collected using a questionnaire which contained statements presented on a five-point Likert scale and open-ended questions. The questionnaire was filled online by 100 students and professionals. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, and the open-ended questions were analyzed with inductive content analysis. As a result, the participants were satisfied with the large group simulation intended for learning interprofessional collaboration (mean = 4.42, SD = 0.759). The majority viewed it as a good learning method (95%) that is suitable for interprofessional collaboration learning (90%) and for promoting working together (82%). Digitally activated communication tools promoted interactive discussion and activated joint learning. However, only one activation tool was preferred instead of using two methods simultaneously. In conclusion, distanced large group simulations were evaluated to be a good method for learning interprofessional collaboration. This study was not registered.
Keywords: large group simulation; distance learning; interprofessional collaboration; healthcare education large group simulation; distance learning; interprofessional collaboration; healthcare education

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silén-Lipponen, M.; Piippo-Savolainen, E.; Azimirad, M.; Saaranen, T. Distanced Large Group Simulations as a Learning Method for Interprofessional Collaboration. Nurs. Rep. 2024, 14, 2640-2650. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040195

AMA Style

Silén-Lipponen M, Piippo-Savolainen E, Azimirad M, Saaranen T. Distanced Large Group Simulations as a Learning Method for Interprofessional Collaboration. Nursing Reports. 2024; 14(4):2640-2650. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silén-Lipponen, Marja, Eija Piippo-Savolainen, Mina Azimirad, and Terhi Saaranen. 2024. "Distanced Large Group Simulations as a Learning Method for Interprofessional Collaboration" Nursing Reports 14, no. 4: 2640-2650. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040195

APA Style

Silén-Lipponen, M., Piippo-Savolainen, E., Azimirad, M., & Saaranen, T. (2024). Distanced Large Group Simulations as a Learning Method for Interprofessional Collaboration. Nursing Reports, 14(4), 2640-2650. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040195

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop