Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Stability-To-Chaos in the Dynamic Evolution of Network Traffic Flows under a Dual Updating Mechanism
Next Article in Special Issue
Value Addition and Productivity Differentials in the Nigerian Cassava System
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Inter-Organisational Collaboration Networks on Climate Knowledge Flows and Communication to Pastoralists in Kenya
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tree Species Diversity and Socioeconomic Perspectives of the Urban (Food) Forest of Accra, Ghana
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Ghana’s Comparative Advantage in Maize Production and the Role of Fertilizers

Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans-Ruthenberg-Institute), University of Hohenheim, Wollgrasweg 43, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 4181; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114181
Submission received: 19 August 2018 / Revised: 4 November 2018 / Accepted: 9 November 2018 / Published: 13 November 2018

Abstract

Maize is one of the most important cereal crops produced and consumed in West Africa, but yields are far under their potential and the production gap leads to growing import bills. After the structural adjustment program, fertilizer subsidies again became a popular intervention to increase yields in most African countries. Ghana introduced fertilizer subsidies in 2008, with high government expenses. This study assesses the competitiveness of Ghanaian maize production and the significance of socio-economic and management variables in determining high yields in northern Ghana. Household survey data and secondary data were applied in a Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) to test private and social profitability of the fertilizer subsidy policy. Additionally, a probit model is used to determine the characteristics that contribute to higher yields. The results suggest that production systems with Ghana’s above-average yields of 1.5 Mt/ha are profitable at household level and contribute to its economic growth, whereas production systems below this threshold report negative social profits and depend on government intervention. However, fertilizers did not increase the likelihood of a household to fall in the category of high-output production system, whereas the use of improved seeds and herbicides does. In conclusion, the analysis highlights the importance of additional measures, especially the use of supporting inputs as well as management practices, to increased maize productivity.
Keywords: maize; Policy Analysis Matrix; comparative advantage; probit; Ghana maize; Policy Analysis Matrix; comparative advantage; probit; Ghana

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Scheiterle, L.; Birner, R. Assessment of Ghana’s Comparative Advantage in Maize Production and the Role of Fertilizers. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114181

AMA Style

Scheiterle L, Birner R. Assessment of Ghana’s Comparative Advantage in Maize Production and the Role of Fertilizers. Sustainability. 2018; 10(11):4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scheiterle, Lilli, and Regina Birner. 2018. "Assessment of Ghana’s Comparative Advantage in Maize Production and the Role of Fertilizers" Sustainability 10, no. 11: 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114181

APA Style

Scheiterle, L., & Birner, R. (2018). Assessment of Ghana’s Comparative Advantage in Maize Production and the Role of Fertilizers. Sustainability, 10(11), 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop