Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty as a Part of Customer-Based Corporate Sustainability in the Sector of Mobile Communications Services
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework (Literature Overview)
2.1. Quality of Electronic Communications Services and Customer Satisfaction
2.2. Customer Satisfaction Measurement
European Customer Satisfaction Index
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. National Policy for Electronic Communications for 2020
- Mobile network services are on the rise and fixed network services are decreasing (approximately 10% in 2014 compared to 2013).
- Operation in mobile networks is several times higher than in fixed networks (e.g., the number of internal calls in mobile networks is more than 18 times higher than in fixed networks, while average call time in the mobile network about 2.1 min and in the fixed network about 4.3 min).
3.2. Slovak Telekom Customer Satisfaction
3.3. ECSI Application to Evaluate Quality of Mobile Communications Services
- Specification of measurable variables for ECSI model;
- Determining the importance of individual measurable variables;
- Converting measurable variables into questionnaire scale questions; and
- Calculation of ECSI index.
3.3.1. Calculation of ECSI index
3.3.2. Selection Group Size and Quota Selection
4. Results
4.1. Determining Measurable Variables and Assessing Their Relevance for ECSI Model
4.2. Interpretation of Outputs Acquired from XLStat Software
5. Discussion
- Only less than a tenth of respondents (9%) remain with their provider because they are satisfied with their services;
- 16% of the survey participants would change the provider, but they are bound by a long-term contract with the current provider; and
- Improving customer service would reduce their exit to competition by 18% [37].
- Electronic communications services providers need to pay attention to developing distinguished and competitive value-added services to increase satisfaction of customers towards overall service quality.
- Electronic communications services providers should not only have competitive promotions but also make the best use of various channels in different campaigns to avoid imitation from competitors.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Behnam, S.; Cagliano, R. Be Sustainable to Be Innovate: An Analysis of Their Mutual Reinforcement. Sustainability 2017, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewan, M.N.A.; Chowdhury, M.M.H.; Quaddus, M.A. Three Dimensional Components of e-Business Sustainability. In E-Business and Telecommunications (ICETE); Book Series: Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012; Volume 455, pp. 55–71. [Google Scholar]
- Turkyilmaz, A.; Oztekin, A.; Zaim, S.; Demirel, O.F. Universal structure modeling approach to customer satisfaction index. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2013, 113, 932–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moisescu, O.I. From perceptual corporate sustainability to customer loyalty: A multi-sectorial investigation in a developing country. Econ. Res. Ekon. Istraz. 2018, 31, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amini, M.; Bienstock, C.C. Corporate sustainability: An integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 76, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumgartner, R.J. Managing corporate sustainability and CSR: A conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2014, 21, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Marrewijk, M. Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. J. Bus. Ethics 2003, 44, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De los Salmones, M.G.; Crespo, A.H.; del Bosque, I.R. Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services. J. Bus. Ethics 2005, 61, 369–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlachos, P.A.; Tsamakos, A.; Vrechopoulos, A.P.; Avramidis, P.K. Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty and the mediating role of trust. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2009, 37, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Li, Y. CSR and service brand: The mediating effect of brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 100, 673–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Park, E.; Kwon, S.J.; del Pobil, A.P. Antecedents of behavioral intention to use mobile telecommunication services: Effects of corporate social responsibility and technology acceptance. Sustainability 2015, 7, 11345–11359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, W.C.; Anuchit, S. Service quality in the Thai telecommunications industry: A tool for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage. Manag. Decis. 2002, 40, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A. Evaluating the Deming Management Model of Total Quality in Telecommunication Industry in Pakistan—An Empirical Study. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2010, 5, 46–59. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, C.-M.; Chao-Ton, S. Quality management practices in Taiwan’s telecommunications industry. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2002, 6, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCalla, C.; Whitt, W. A Time-Dependent Queueing-Network Model to Describe the Life-Cycle Dynamics of Private-Line Telecommunication Services. Telecommun. Syst. 2002, 19, 9–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade, R.; Lisser, A.; Maculan, N.; Plateau, G. Telecommunication Network Capacity Design for Uncertain Demand. Comput. Optim. Appl. 2004, 29, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wedde, H.F.; Muddassar, F. A comprehensive review of nature inspired routing algorithms for fixed telecommunication networks. J. Syst. Archit. 2006, 52, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matias, J.C.O.; Reis, M.; Azevedo, S.G. Framework to analyse the Influence of Quality on Customer Satisfaction in the Mobile Telecommunication Sector. Qual. Access Success 2015, 16, 85–92. [Google Scholar]
- National Policy for Electronic Communications for 2020. Available online: https://www.mindop.sk/ministerstvo-1/elektronicke-komunikacie-8/strategicke-dokumenty/politika/narodna-politika-pre-elektronicke-komunikacie-do-roku-2020-uznesenie-vlady-sr-c-540-2015 (accessed on 30 April 2018).
- Jankalova, M. Service Quality—Object of Business Excellence Measuring. Rev. Eur. Stud. 2016, 8, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rostasova, M. Kvalita Služieb Vnímaná Zákazníkom; EDIS: Žilina, Slovakia, 2008; p. 74. ISBN 978-80-8070-894-8.
- Harris, M.; Harrington, H.J. Service quality in the knowledge age: Huge opportunities for the twenty-first century. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2000, 4, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateides, A.; Dado, J. Manažérstvo Kvality; Epos: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2006; p. 751. ISBN 80-8057-656-4. [Google Scholar]
- Foret, M.; Stavkova, J. Marketingový Výzkum: Jak Poznávat Své Zákazníky, 1st ed.; Grada Publishing: Prague, Czech Republic, 2003; p. 160. ISBN 80-247-0385-8. [Google Scholar]
- Gasparini, M.; Pellerey, F.; Proietti, M. Bayesian hierarchical models to analyze customer satisfaction data for quality improvement: A case study. Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. Ind. 2012, 28, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vilares, M.; Coelho, P. The employee-customer satisfaction chain in the ECSI model. Eur. J. Mark. 2004, 37, 1703–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szwarc, P. Researching Customer Satisfaction & Loyalty: How to Find Out What People Really Think; Kogan Page: London, UK, 2005; p. 258. ISBN 978-0-7494-4336-8. [Google Scholar]
- Lam, S.Y.; Shankar, V.; Erramilli, M.K.; Murthy, B. Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: An illustration from a business-to-business service context. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2004, 32, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helgesen, O. Are loyal customers profitable? Customer satisfaction, customer (action) loyalty and customer profitability at the individual level. J. Mark. Manag. 2006, 22, 245–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateides, A.; Dado, J. Služby: Teória Služieb, Marketing Služieb, Kvalita v Službách, Služby Zákazníkom a Meranie Spokojnosti s Nimi; EPOS: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2002; p. 725. ISBN 80-8057-452-9. [Google Scholar]
- Sarantidou, P. Enriching the ECSI model using brand strength in the retail setting. Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2017, 26, 294–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksoy, L. How do you measure what you can’t define? The current state of loyalty measurement and management. J. Serv. Manag. 2013, 24, 356–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, I. The Nexus between CSR, Corporate Image, Company Identification, Emotional Attachment and Small Equity Investors Behavior. Int. J. Appl. Behav. Econ. 2017, 6, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Report on Responsible Business of Slovak Telekom for 2013, 2014, 2015. Available online: https://www.telekom.sk/o-spolocnosti-telekom/zodpovedne-podnikanie/sprava-o-zodpovednom-podnikani/ (accessed on 15 February 2018).
- Darena, F. Služba Výpočtu CSI pro PEF. Available online: https://akela.mendelu.cz/~darena/CSI/ (accessed on 15 January 2018).
- Askariazad, M.H.; Babakhani, N. An application of European Customer Satisfaction Index (ECSI) in business to business (B2B) context. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2015, 30, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prieskum: Poskytovatelia Komunikacnych Sluzieb Nedokazu Zaistit Spokojnost Svojich Zakaznikov. Available online: https://www.pcrevue.sk/en/community/article/detail/url/Prieskum--Poskytovatelia-komunikacnych-sluzieb-nedokazu-zaistit-spokojnost-svojich-zakaznikov (accessed on 12 April 2018).
Dimension of Quality | Characteristics of Dimension |
---|---|
Technical dimension of quality | Includes the extent of the service, i.e., “what” is offered to the customer. In this case, quality is understood as the sum or level of the existing characteristics of a product. It is measured based on objective criteria. |
Functional dimension of quality | It interprets “how” a particular service is offered. Thus, quality is defined as the characteristics of a product as perceived by the customer. Quality is measured based on subjective criteria. |
Latent Variables | Measurable Variables/Indicators | Weight of Importance | Average of Values | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Image | Imp1 | Appearance of provider’s stores | 3.0 | 7.9 |
Imp2 | The unified appearance of provider’s personnel (uniform, …) | 2.6 | 8.2 | |
Imp3 | Comprehensibility of materials, brochures and web pages (in terms of price specifications and technical parameters of services) | 2.5 | 8.4 | |
Imp4 | Knowledge of the logo by the company’s customers | 2.7 | 7.6 | |
Customer expectation | Exp1 | The expectation of quality of services provided by the company | 2.5 | 8.2 |
Exp2 | The expectation of fast and ready to help personnel at the provider’s stores | 2.7 | 6.5 | |
Exp3 | Expecting total customer satisfaction when leaving the store | 2.5 | 6.5 | |
Perceived quality | Qua1 | Total perceived quality of services | 2.6 | 6.9 |
Qua2 | Provider’s approach to new technologies | 2.8 | 7.0 | |
Qua3 | Customer service and support (My Telekom, Telekom app, Telekom forum) | 3.1 | 6.1 | |
Qua4 | Quality and availability of Telekom centers, customer line | 3.3 | 6.4 | |
Qua5 | Selection of offered products and services | 3.1 | 6.5 | |
Qua6 | Reliability and accuracy of provided services | 3.0 | 6.3 | |
Qua7 | Clarity and transparency of provided information | 3.2 | 6.4 | |
Qua8 | Professional competence of personnel | 2.2 | 7.3 | |
Qua9 | Options for service modification | 2.2 | 7.1 | |
Perceived value | Val1 | Evaluation of mobile calling services from the viewpoint of prices and parameters | 3.5 | 6.2 |
Val2 | Evaluation of service quality in comparison with service prices | 3.2 | 5.9 | |
Val3 | Evaluation of satisfaction with the amount and quality of offered benefits and discounts | 3.9 | 6.1 | |
Val4 | Evaluating whether the company uses the appropriate form of marketing communication | 2.9 | 6.8 | |
Customer satisfaction | Sat1 | Fulfilling expectations about the services the company provides to the customer | 3.8 | 6.7 |
Sat2 | Overall satisfaction with the provider | 3.4 | 7.0 | |
Customer complaints | Com1 | The provider always records complaints from the customer | 4.2 | 6.9 |
Com2 | Provider’s approach to complaints handling | 4.1 | 6.7 | |
Com3 | The speed of provider’s handling customer complaints/provider’s commenting on customer complaints | 3.7 | 6.4 | |
Customer loyalty | Loy1 | Confirmation of Telekom’s re-selection as an provider | 3.1 | 6.3 |
Loy2 | A customer‘s willingness to choose a competing provider if they offer a wider portfolio of services | 4.3 | 5.3 | |
Loy3 | Evaluation of the customer’s willingness not to choose a competing provider if they offered the same services at significantly lower prices | 4.2 | 5.3 | |
Loy4 | Evaluation of willingness to recommend one’s provider to a friend or family | 2.4 | 6.2 | |
Loy5 | Evaluation of willingness to stay with the provider in the future | 2.7 | 5.4 |
Image | Customer Expectation | Perceived Quality | Perceived Value | Customer Satisfaction | Customer Complaints | Customer Loyalty | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Image | 1.000 | ||||||
Customer expectation | 0.510 | 1.000 | |||||
Perceived quality | 0.429 | 0.576 | 1.000 | ||||
Perceived value | 0.282 | 0.398 | 0.502 | 1.000 | |||
Customer satisfaction | 0.385 | 0.529 | 0.613 | 0.494 | 1.000 | ||
Customer complaints | 0.339 | 0.581 | 0.666 | 0.469 | 0.508 | 1.000 | |
Customer loyalty | 0.190 | 0.287 | 0.372 | 0.606 | 0.308 | 0.386 | 1.000 |
Indicators | Imp1 | Imp2 | Imp3 | Imp4 | Exp1 | Exp2 | Exp3 | Qua1 | Qua2 | Qua3 | Qua4 | Qua5 | Qua6 | Qua7 | Qua8 | Qua9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imp1 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
Imp2 | 0.43 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
Imp3 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
Imp4 | 0.39 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
Exp1 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
Exp2 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
Exp3 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 1.00 | |||||||||
Qua1 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 1.00 | ||||||||
Qua2 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.39 | 1.00 | |||||||
Qua3 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 0.67 | 1.00 | ||||||
Qua4 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 1.00 | |||||
Qua5 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 1.00 | ||||
Qua6 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 1.00 | |||
Qua7 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 1.00 | ||
Qua8 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 1.00 | |
Qua9 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 1.00 |
Val1 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.41 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.40 |
Val2 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.18 |
Val3 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.41 |
Val4 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.25 |
Sat1 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.49 |
Sat2 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.29 |
Com1 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.22 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.40 | 0.45 |
Com2 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.46 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.49 |
Com3 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.45 |
Loy1 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.32 | −0.01 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.37 |
Loy2 | 0.04 | −0.08 | −0.12 | 0.13 | −0.08 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
Loy3 | −0.13 | −0.11 | −0.16 | 0.11 | −0.13 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.08 | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.17 |
Loy4 | 0.11 | 0.05 | −0.02 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.08 | −0.01 | 0.12 | −0.02 | −0.01 | 0.13 | 0.06 | −0.07 |
Loy5 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
Indicators | Val1 | Val2 | Val3 | Val4 | Sat1 | Sat2 | Com1 | Com2 | Com3 | Loy1 | Loy2 | Loy3 | Loy4 | Loy5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Val1 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
Val2 | 0.65 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
Val3 | 0.45 | 0.37 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
Val4 | 0.32 | 0.15 | 0.49 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
Sat1 | 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Sat2 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.46 | 1.0 | ||||||||
Com1 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 1.00 | |||||||
Com2 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.37 | 0.20 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 1.00 | ||||||
Com3 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.52 | 1.00 | |||||
Loy1 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 1.00 | ||||
Loy2 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.42 | 1.00 | |||
Loy3 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 1.00 | ||
Loy4 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1.00 | |
Loy5 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.58 | 1.00 |
Latent Variables | Weights | CSI | CSI (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Image | 3.0; 2.6; 2.5; 2.7 | 0.8025 | 80.2% |
Customer expectation | 2.5; 2.7; 2.5 | 0.7050 | 70.5% |
Perceived quality | 2.6; 2.8; 3.1; 3.3; 3.2; 3.0; 3.2; 2.2; 2.2 | 0.7601 | 76.0% |
Perceived value | 3.5; 3.2; 3.9; 2,9 | 0.6950 | 69.5% |
Customer satisfaction | 3.8; 3.4 | 0.6824 | 68.2% |
Customer complaints | 4.2; 4.1; 3.7 | 0.6694 | 66.9% |
Customer loyalty | 3.1; 4.3; 4.2; 2.4; 2.7 | 0.6263 | 62.6% |
Total customer satisfaction index | 0.7001 | 70.0% |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Strenitzerová, M.; Gaňa, J. Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty as a Part of Customer-Based Corporate Sustainability in the Sector of Mobile Communications Services. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051657
Strenitzerová M, Gaňa J. Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty as a Part of Customer-Based Corporate Sustainability in the Sector of Mobile Communications Services. Sustainability. 2018; 10(5):1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051657
Chicago/Turabian StyleStrenitzerová, Mariana, and Ján Gaňa. 2018. "Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty as a Part of Customer-Based Corporate Sustainability in the Sector of Mobile Communications Services" Sustainability 10, no. 5: 1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051657