The Effect of Emerging Green Market on Green Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development in Knowledge-Based Companies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Research Literature
2.1. Green Market
2.2. Green Entrepreneurship
2.3. Sustainable Development
2.4. The Theoretical Framework of Research
3. Research Model
Conceptual Model and Hypotheses
4. Methodology
4.1. Data Collection
4.2. Measures
5. Results
5.1. Measurement Model
5.2. Structural Model
6. Discussion
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Managerial and Practical Implication
7. Limitations and Avenue for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Questionnaire Items
About the Emerging Green Market
Green Product (GP)
Green Design (GD)
Green Supply Chain (GSC)
Green Production (GP)
Green Entrepreneurship (GE)
Sustainable Development (SD)
Position of the respondent:
- General manager
- Technical manager
- Financial manager
- Sales manager
- Others
The manufacturing industry within which scope the company has its activities:
- Mechanics, electronics, control, and communication
- Information and telecommunication technologies and computer software
- Medical instruments, accessories, and equipment
- Nanotechnology and advanced material
- Optics and photonics
- High-tech manufacturing, production, and experimental equipment
- Renewable energies
- Food and pharmaceutical industries
- Agricultural science and natural resource
- Earth science
- Others
Number of employees of the company:
- Less than 50 individuals
- 51–150 individuals
- 151–300 individuals
- More than 300 individuals
Average annual revenue of the company:
- Less than $5 million
- $5–15 million
- $16–25 million
- $26–35 million
- Others
Work experience of the responding manager:
- Less than 1 year
- 2–5 years
- 5–10 years
- More than 10 years
References
- Sharma, N.K.; Kushwaha, G.S. Emerging Green market as an Opportunity for Green Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development in India. J. Entrep. Organ. Manag. 2015, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolaoua, E.I.; Ierapetritis, D.; Tsagarakis, K.P. An evaluation of the prospects of green entrepreneurship development using a SWOT analysis. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2011, 18, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- York, J.G.; Venkataraman, S. The entrepreneur—Environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation. J. Bus. Ventur. 2010, 25, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirkwood, J.; Walton, S. How green is green? Ecopreneurs balancing environmental concerns and business goals. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 21, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arabiun, A.; Abdi, J.A.; Kashefi, A. Entrepreneurship in the context of modern technologies: An Approach to Green Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development, Nanotechnology. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Environment and Natural Resources, Kharazmi Higher Education Institute of Science and Technology, Shiraz, Iran, 21 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Walley, L.; Taylor, D.; Greig, K. Beynod the Visionary Champion: Testing a typology of green entrepreneurs. In Making Ecopreneurs: Developing Sustainable; Schaper, M.T., Ed.; Gower Publishing, Ltd.: Aldershot, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Khanna, P. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in different vegetables grown in and around urban areas. J. Environ. Toxicol. 2011, 5, 162–179. [Google Scholar]
- Garg, A. Green marketing for Sustainable Development: An Industry perspective. J. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 23, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, J.K.; Leno, M.J. Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. J. Bus. Ventur. 2010, 25, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kushwaha, R. Green marketing: Opportunity for Innovation and Sustainable Development; Jhunjhunwala Business School: Faizabad, India, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Horisch, J. Entrepreneurship as Facilitator for Sustainable Development? J. Adv. Sustain. Entrep. 2016, 6, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Majerova, J. Analysis of Slovak Consumers perception of the green marketing Activitis. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 26, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, Z.; Ali, N.A. The Impact of green marketing strategy on the firm’s performance in Malaysia. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 172, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Souza, C.; Taghian, M.; Sullivan-Mort, G.; Gilmore, A. An Evaluation of the role of green marketing and a firm’s internal practices for environmental sustainability. J. Strateg. Mark. 2015, 23, 600–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glenn, R.R.J.; Carolyn, F.; Musgrove, S.T.; Gillison, C.B.G. The effects of environmental focus and program timing on green marketing performance and the moderating role of resource commitment. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2014, 43, 1246–1257. [Google Scholar]
- Prause, G.; Hunke, K. Suatainable Entrepreneurship Along green corridors. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2014, 1, 114–133. [Google Scholar]
- Silajdzic, I.; Midzic Kurtagic, S.; Vucijak, B. Green entrepreneurship in transition economies. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 88, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davari, A.; Strutton, D. Marketing mix Strategies for closing the gap between green consumers pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. J. Strateg. Mark. 2014, 22, 563–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergset, L.; Fichter, K. Green start-ups—A new typology for sustainable entrepreneurship and innovation research. J. Innov. Manag. 2015, 3, 118–144. [Google Scholar]
- Chkanikova, O.; Lehner, M. Private eco-brands and green market development: towards new forms of sustainability governance in the food retailing. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gast, J.; Gundolf, K.; Cesinger, B. Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 147, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Ye, F.; Sheu, C.; Yang, Q. Linking green market orientation and performance: Antecedents and processes. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 192, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaltegger, S.; Lüdeke-Freund, F.; Erik, G. Hansen, Business Models for Sustainability: A Co-Evolutionary Analysis of Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Transformation. Organ. Environ. 2016, 29, 264–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emami, D. Networks and clusters of green entrepreneurship, Social, Economic, Scientific and Cultural Monthly. J. Work Soc. 2014, 176, 50–64. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahzadeh, G.; Sharifzadeh, M.S. Integration of Sustainability in the Process of Entrepreneurship: Explaining the Concept, Needs and Requirements of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and the Green Business. J. Entrep. Agric. 2014, 1, 39–62. [Google Scholar]
- Schumpeter, J.A. Theory of Economic Development; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1934. [Google Scholar]
- Dillman, D.A. The design and administration of mail surveys. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1991, 1, 225–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranaei Kordshuli, H.; Yari, A. The Effect of Green Marketing Mix on Green Shopping Decision of Consumers. Res.-Sci. J. Mod. Mark. 2012, 4, 92–165. [Google Scholar]
- Borin, N.; Douglas, C.; Cerf, K.R. Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labeling. J. Consum. Mark. 2011, 28, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanington, P.C.; Rieger, A.M.; Belosevic, M.; Konowalchuk, J.D.; Havixbeck, J.J.; Smith, M.K.; Robbins, J.S.; Lund, J.M. A teleost CSF-1 receptor is a novel regulator of macrophage proliferation and inflammation. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 6, 1638. [Google Scholar]
- Duber-Smith, D.C. The Imperatie Soap. Perfum. Cosmet. 2012, 78, 24–26. [Google Scholar]
- Ninlawan, C.; Seksan, P.; Tossapol, K. The Implementation of Green Supply Chein Management Practices in Electronics Industry. In Proceeding of the International Malti Conferenece of Engineering and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, 17–19 March 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Lixiongyi Wang, W. Research on Green Supply Chain Management; School of Management Zhongyuan University of Technology: Zhongyuan, China, 2011; pp. 45–47. [Google Scholar]
- Gefen, D.; Straub, D.W. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Commun. AIS 2005, 16, 91–109. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Some methods for re-specifying measurement models to obtain unidimensional construct measurement. J. Mark. Res. 1988, 19, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barclay, D.W.; Higgins, C.; Thompson, R. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adaptation and use as an illustration. Technol. Stud. 1995, 2, 285–309. [Google Scholar]
- Seyed Abaszadeh, M.M.; Amani Sari Begloo, J.; Hayman Khezri, A.; Pashavi, G. An Introduction to the Structural Equation Model Using PLS Method and Its Application in Behavioral Sciences; Urumia University Press: Urumia, Iran, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Vinzi, V.E.; Trinchera, L.; Amato, S. PLS path modeling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; pp. 47–82. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadian, M. The importance of green marketing in the field of entrepreneurship and the identification and ranking of the most important executive challenges. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Entrepreneurship in the Knowledge-Based Industry, Tehran, Iran, 3–5 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Lotfi, M. Resilience, Agility, and Leanness in Supply Chain Management; Conceptual Development and Empirical Analysis; Scholars’ Press: Saarbrücken, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mousavi, S.F. Identification of Effective Factors on Green Marketing and Its Consequences. In Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Modern Management Science, Tehran, Iran, 25–27 July 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Gulcin, B.; Gizem, C. Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: A fuzzy ANP approach. Prod. Plan. Control Manag. Oper. 2012, 23, 405–418. [Google Scholar]
- Lotfi, M.; Saghiri, S. Disentangling resilience, agility and leanness: Conceptual development and empirical analysis. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2018, 29, 168–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Reference | Scope | Findings |
---|---|---|
[11] | Entrepreneurship as a sustainable facilitator | Entrepreneurship has the ability to facilitate sustainable development by emphasizing on the evolution of the concept of production, exploitation, and innovation for the production of a new good or a new output, by reorganizing the industry and using technological facilities. |
[12] | Consumer relationship with green marketing activities and their impact on consumers’ purchase decision | The green character of the product has a positive effect on the buying behaviour of the majority of respondents. Improvement of the performance of Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) countries has a positive impact on the behaviour of the majority of respondents. |
[13] | The impact of green marketing on companies | Green innovation and green promotion have a positive effect on the performance of companies. With the rapid growth of green products around the world, marketers should be able to identify the best green markets and take appropriate strategies to cater for the needs and demands of consumers. |
[14] | An evaluation of the role of green marketing and a firm’s internal practices for environmental sustainability | Identification of four applied fields (i) green suppliers, (ii) environmental resource management, (iii) green research and development, and (iv) environmental manufacturing processes and procedures led the company to adopt a green marketing strategy. |
[8] | Green marketing for sustainable development | Public and private companies are worried about the environment and believe that green marketing should become a norm in developing countries like India, and that green businesses and green marketing provide an opportunity to help sustainable development. |
[1] | Emerging green market as an opportunity for green entrepreneurs and sustainable development in India | Consumers and the environment are more aware, and today, the concept of green products and the green market are taking place slowly and continuously in the market. This is a good opportunity for companies that believe in innovation and redesign their products and services in an economically successful way. |
[15] | The effects of environmental focus and program timing on green marketing performance and the moderating role of resource commitment | Suggests that the commitment of proper resources is critical to the success of any green initiative. It also points out that being the first firm in an industry to start a green program provides few tangible benefits. More importantly, even firms with an environmental focus neglect to realize superior performance unless the specific strategy is matched with consistent top management support. |
[16] | Sustainable entrepreneurship along green corridors | The green concept for transport and business has been introduced by the European Commission, which includes a framework for green entrepreneurship and sustainable development for the benefit of the ecosystem. The green concept of businesses has become overwhelming, therefore, a number of ways to provide a framework for sustainable development using the green concept of entrepreneurship are introduced. |
[17] | Green entrepreneurship in transition economies | Entrepreneurs in transition economies do not seem to be ready to respond to the challenges of the transition or to any kind of risks associated with investing in the green business. In these countries, specific legislation is not seen as related to the green business framework, the promotion of green entrepreneurship, and the development of small businesses and small and medium enterprises. |
[18] | Mixed marketing strategies to fill the gap between environmental beliefs of green consumers’ confidence in beliefs | A significant gap exists between the pro-environmental beliefs and green consumer behaviour. The potential impact of consumer environmental concerns has been addressed. In general, there is a need for a broad expansion of applications and short-term marketing programs. |
[19] | New topology for Green start-ups | Brings together research and theory on entrepreneurship and innovation, as well as sustainable business practice, and suggests a new topology to enable further empirical exploration of specific challenges and opportunities. |
[20] | Towards new forms of sustainability governance in the food retailing | To analyze the role of retail eco-brands in the development of markets for sustainability certified food products. |
[21] | Doing business in a green way | A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions to help researchers to take stock of the existing literature and advance this research field. |
[22] | Linking green market orientation and performance | To investigate how a competitive environment can motivate firms to adopt a green market orientation, and how that orientation can result in firms’ superior performance (environmental and financial) through both internal green practice and green supply chain management. |
[23] | A Co-Evolutionary Analysis of Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Transformation | To develop a theoretical framework to analyze co-evolutionary business model development for sustainable niche pioneers and conventional mass market players aiming at the sustainability transformation of markets. |
Title of Respondents: | No. of Employees: | ||
---|---|---|---|
General Manager | 15.71 | Less than 50 | 80 |
Technical Manager | 15.71 | 50–150 | 17.1 |
Financial Manager | 32.87 | 151–300 | 2.9 |
Sales Manager | 11.44 | More than 300 | 0 |
Others | 24.27 | ||
Manufacturing industry: | Average annual sale: | ||
Agriculture and natural resources | 2.9 | Less than $5 Million | 75.7 |
Information technology | 21.4 | $5–15 Million | 10 |
Advanced laboratory equipment | 2.9 | $16–25 Million | 1.4 |
Medical equipment | 7.1 | $26–35 Million | 1.4 |
Food and drug industries | 4.3 | Others | 11.4 |
Mechanics and electronics | 22.9 | ||
Earth sciences | 8.6 | Years of experience at the position: | |
Nanotechnology | 2.9 | Less than 1 years | 1.4 |
Optics and photonics | 2.9 | Between 2 and 5 years | 44.3 |
New energiese | 2.9 | Between 5 and 10 years | 27.1 |
Others | 21.4 | More than 10 years | 27.1 |
Construct | Measures | References |
---|---|---|
Green product (GP) | GP1. It should contain elements that are useful for the environment. GP2. It should be efficient in terms of energy consumption. GP3. It should be made from materials that make the product recyclable. GP4. Its production process should be environmentally-friendly. GP5. It should generate as low environmental pollution as possible. | [1,28,29] |
Green design (GD) | GD1. Product design should be performed according to environmental regulations. GD2. Product should be designed for lower adoption of hazardous raw material. GD3. Product safety should be considered in the design process. GD4. Products should be designed to minimize the consumption of sources of energy. GD5. Product design should provide reusability. | [1,28,30] |
Green supply chain (GSC) | GSC1. The company should use ecologically effective transportation fleet. GSC2. Individuals should be promoted to adopt cost-effective driving to reduce fuel consumption. GSC3. Environment management systems should be adopted according to up-to-date standards. GSC4. Control and monitoring systems should be developed to ensure observance of environmental standards. GSC5. Collaboration with green suppliers should be promoted. | [1,25,31] |
Green production (GP) | GP1. Product manufacturing should manifest environmental commitment of the company. GP2. One should adopt environmentally friendly technologies. GP3. Human health should be considered in the course of product manufacturing. GP4. Product manufacturing should be directed toward reduced environmental damages. GP5. Product manufacturing should be performed for green commerce. | [1,32,33] |
Green Entrepreneurship (GE) | GE1. Green entrepreneurship eliminates environmental degradation. GE2. The company should establish a balance between raising profit, considering the environment, and taking into account innovation and modern methods for green business. GE3. Producing products and services for profitability and green commerce is a priority. GE4. Green businesses present opportunities for making profit from ecological scopes. GE5. Green entrepreneurship serves as a driving force for triggering new economic growth in modern economies. | [1,2,24,25] |
Sustainable development (SD) | SD1. Increased human welfare may not be attained at the expense of interrupting ecologic processes. SD2. The company should prevent such problems as the degradation of natural resources. SD3. The company should prevent lowered quality of life for humans at present and future. SD4. The company should provide a basis for enhanced social and cultural positions of the societies. SD5. The company should proceed toward job by synergizing economic, social, and environmental factors. | [18,24,25] |
Question/Variable | Green Product | Green Design | Green Supply Chain | Green Production | Green Entrepreneurship | Sustainable Development |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GP1 | 0.73 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.26 |
GP2 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.32 | 0.3 | 0.34 | 0.22 |
GP3 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.29 | 0.27 |
GP4 | 0.88 | 0.49 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.47 |
GP5 | 0.84 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.54 |
GD1 | 0.43 | 0.78 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.4 | 0.39 |
GD2 | 0.38 | 0.57 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.28 |
GD3 | 0.32 | 0.75 | 0.42 | 0.22 | 0.39 | 0.19 |
GD4 | 0.34 | 0.85 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.37 |
GD5 | 0.14 | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.31 |
GS1 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.51 | 0.33 |
GS2 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.84 | 0.19 | 0.49 | 0.29 |
GS3 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.78 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.43 |
GS4 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 0.5 | 0.39 |
GS5 | 0.5 | 0.26 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.48 |
GP1 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.73 | 0.39 | 0.31 |
GP2 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.1 | 0.62 | 0.12 | 0.18 |
GP3 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 0.66 | 0.24 | 0.34 |
GP4 | 0.26 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.84 | 0.25 | 0.39 |
GP5 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.58 | 0.13 | 0.5 |
GE1 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.81 | 0.35 |
GE2 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.19 | 0.8 | 0.21 |
GE3 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 0.55 | 0.34 | 0.83 | 0.18 |
GE4 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.4 | 0.23 | 0.61 | 0.28 |
GE5 | 0.48 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.78 | 0.39 |
SD1 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 0.73 |
SD2 | 0.4 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.73 |
SD3 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.62 |
SD4 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.19 | 0.81 |
SD5 | 0.45 | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.77 |
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Green product | 0.76 | |||||
2. Green design | 0.41 ** | 0.73 | ||||
3. Green supply chain | 0.53 ** | 0.43 ** | 0.79 | |||
4. Green production | 0.44 ** | 0.41 ** | 0.42 ** | 0.71 | ||
5. Green entrepreneurship | 0.50 ** | 0.51 ** | 0.60 ** | 0.41 ** | 0.77 | |
6. Sustainable Development | 0.47 ** | 0.44 ** | 0.45 ** | 0.51 ** | 0.42 ** | 0.73 |
Variable | PC | AVE | α |
---|---|---|---|
Green product | 0.87 | 0.58 | 0.82 |
Green design | 0.85 | 0.53 | 0.77 |
Green supply chain | 0.89 | 0.63 | 0.85 |
Green production | 0.82 | 0.50 | 0.73 |
Green entrepreneurship | 0.88 | 0.59 | 0.82 |
Sustainable development | 0.85 | 0.54 | 0.70 |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lotfi, M.; Yousefi, A.; Jafari, S. The Effect of Emerging Green Market on Green Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development in Knowledge-Based Companies. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072308
Lotfi M, Yousefi A, Jafari S. The Effect of Emerging Green Market on Green Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development in Knowledge-Based Companies. Sustainability. 2018; 10(7):2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072308
Chicago/Turabian StyleLotfi, Maryam, Akram Yousefi, and Soheil Jafari. 2018. "The Effect of Emerging Green Market on Green Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development in Knowledge-Based Companies" Sustainability 10, no. 7: 2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072308
APA StyleLotfi, M., Yousefi, A., & Jafari, S. (2018). The Effect of Emerging Green Market on Green Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development in Knowledge-Based Companies. Sustainability, 10(7), 2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072308