1. Introduction
The definition and implementation of actions in the search for more sustainable urban systems and constructions are directed by social, economic and financial, institutional, technological, personnel involved, knowledge and innovation, all taking into account the local context and its complexities [
1]. Economic and financial factors include costs during the life cycle. In this sense, the challenge is to combine the lowest environmental impact with the cost-optimal during the life cycle [
2], reducing the construction process externalities [
1].
Initially, life-cycle costs (LCC) emerged to support the project economic choice. In general, such analysis begins with the identification of the constructive activities involved, followed by identification and measurement of their inputs and outputs in terms of time and cost for acquiring materials and services. In recent decades, with the consolidation of the concept of sustainability (balance among the economic, environmental and social dimensions), the need to harmonize economic costs and socio-environmental impacts has increased. Thus, the LCC began to seek to reconcile the economic dimension with the environmental dimension in the choice of low-impact products and processes [
3]. Similarly, economic costs have also been incorporated into certification and environmental assessment systems, such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), British Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), and Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency (CASBEE) [
4,
5,
6]. In the environmental literature, this integration involves the optimization of economic costs and environmental costs, for example, the reduction of resource consumption and waste generation [
7], use energy efficiency [
8] and reduction of pollutant emissions [
9].
In this sense, an economic tool such as LCC can work in conjunction with environmental analysis methodologies during the construction life-cycle. Applications for LCC can be observed in Life-cycle assessment (LCA) [
10,
11], Life-cycle carbon emissions (LCCE) [
12], Life-cycle energy analysis (LCEA) [
13]. However, combined analysis of LCC, LCA, and LCCE presents challenges, which require time and research to address the different environmental, economic and social requirements. In addition, new approaches have emerged which correlate economic costs and environmental impacts to project management and construction practices, through the adoption of technologies such as BIM [
12,
14,
15] and methodologies such as Lean Construction [
16].
The choice of the evaluation model traditionally also has an impact on the profile of the data to be adopted. Thus, the use of quantitative data predominates in construction cost evaluation systems [
17,
18,
19], on the other hand, most environmental assessment instruments have been adopting a qualitative approach [
20,
21]. In fact, budgets and cost systems are based on quantitative metrics (e.g., quantities of resources consumed, volumes of waste generated, time spent on activity) [
22,
23,
24], beyond others project data and of their bill of quantities (BOQ) [
25,
26]. Meanwhile, environmental and sustainability systems often choose subjective criteria (e.g., expert assessment, scales of comparison) for selecting and excluding the indicators, their weights, and aggregation models, it toward to equate the different dimensions of sustainability (social, environmental and economic) [
10,
21].
In recent decades, new methodologies and systems have been proposed to reduce the subjectivity in the predictive models of the environmental impacts generated by the constructions. Chen et al., (2000) established a construction pollution index (CPI) to estimate the magnitude of the impacts in relation to the duration of construction activities foreseen in the construction schedule [
27]. Gangolells et al., (2014) used data from the list of global enterprise quantities in the definition of a scale of weights to predict and compare environmental impacts [
21,
28]. In both systems, the quantitative data aim to increase the reliability of these models for supporting the decision process and evaluating the available constructive solutions and compare projects.
However, the large volume of data and concepts in multiple areas of knowledge may make it difficult to define the criteria for assessing and measuring the weights of each aspect [
29]. A tool to address this issue are the so-called Decision support systems (DSS) [
30]. The use of DSS, driven by computational advances, has grown in recent years, allowing their users to aggregate and analyze a large volume of data and information [
29]. These analyses have been improving the evaluation and decision-making models for more environmentally-friendly products and processes. Applications of DDS in environmental management can be observed in applications that are related to urban development [
29,
31], occupational health and safety [
32], construction waste management [
33,
34], and Geographic Information System (GIS) [
35]. According to Kazak and Hoof [
29], The DDS tools development should consider 3 keys aspects: (a) the ability to quantify features to reduce subjectivity and increase reliability; (b) the size of the potential results, according to the intended objective, ranging from the comparison within a finite set of choices to the use of open list to test solutions through an interactive process; and (c) the degree of uncertainty, considering the changes between the initial conditions and the implementation process.
In summary, the integration between cost bases and environmental performance assessment models can support to improve both tools in the decision-making process. Quantitative data from the cost bases reduce the subjectivity of environmental tools. At the same time, environmental indicators broaden the scope of the databases by adding sustainability criteria in the description of activities and allowing a comparison beyond the economic dimension in the choice and planning of activities.
Additionally, cost bases are widely used in construction practice, many of which are mandatory. The statistical data on consumption and productivity of these bases undergoes constant revision of the maintainer institution, including data collection directly from the productive sector. The cost bases are also present in most of the curricular content of courses such as civil engineering, production engineering, and architecture. Therefore, such a cost base can be a vehicle to disseminate environmental knowledge among construction workers and construction professionals.
In this context, the article carried out a mapping of environmental indicators in databases of costs to assess their ability to communicate and disseminate environmental information, and use in environmental control systems.
2. Materials and Methods
Figure 1 shows the workflow adopted in the research comprising three steps. The first step has mapped an overview of the applications of cost databases in the state of the art of environmental research and the state of the art of construction management. The second stage has implemented a matrix of assessment of the environmental communication on the cost databases. The final step has classified and analyzed the results, comparing the performance of each tool.
The analysis of the use of construction cost databases in environmental research have adopted a systematic literature review (RSL) of articles. The RSL classified and analyzed these articles by theme approached, research region, environmental tools used, the database of costs cited and what the application of these bases in the environmental study.
The survey of the Brazilian cost databases carried out a documental analysis in pedagogical projects of the engineering courses (PPC) and their programs, which were obtained in the electronic sites of the courses as described in
Appendix A (
Table A1). The search criterion was the occurrence of the following terms: cost database, construction costs or unit cost compositions. The data collection selected a sample of civil engineering course for each Brazilian state and the federal district, with the preference for courses in federal universities.
The selection of cost databases combined the results of the review of the state of the art and recognition of the construction sector [
36]. The analysis of the literature has resulted in the selection of the international databases. In the selection of the national databases, the number of citations in the course projects analyzed prevailed.
An Environmental Communication Assessment Matrix (ECAM) was created to evaluate the cost databases performance (
Table 1). The ECAM structure has intended to correlate the identified cost data with the degree of detail of the associated information. The variables were grouped into 5 themes: IC, information and communication; RW, resources consumption and waste generation; PS, public services demand; MP, machines demand and pollution generation; and, HS, occupational health and safety. The selection of these themes considered relevant environmental aspects from international regulations such as the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) [
37] and scientific articles related to the evaluation of environmental aspects in construction [
21,
27,
38].
A scale of weights (w) was defined to characterize the information quality of a cost data, varying from 0 to 2 according to the information can contribute to a better perception of the relation between the cost data and the environmental aspect: 0, no information or low quality; 1, partial information; and 2, wide information.
The values assigned to the indicators were added to each of the 5 themes. Therefore, the overall score of each of the 5 themes S (S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5) was obtained by the following expression:
where
Si represents the value of environmental theme performance by each selected cost databases with the index
i ranging from 1 to 5 (5 themes);
w is the value adopted to characterize the quality of the environmental information of the data available from the cost databases with the index
k ranging according to the numbers of indicators by theme.
To compare the performance among the different analyzed cost bases, the values given by Equation (1) were normalized, obtaining the normalized scores for the 5 themes (S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5) according to the following equation:
Finally, the overall value (
G) of the performance of each cost databases was obtained by summing the normalized values (
Si) for the 5 themes according to the following equation:
4. Results and Discussion about Costs Databases Assessment
4.1. The System of Classification and Quantification of Cost Bases
In general, the analyzed databases presented structures at hierarchical levels and descriptors to facilitate the consultation and editing, where their compositions can be accessed in block or individually. Such compositions are organized in steps (e.g., worksite preparation, foundations, structure, fence, installations and finish) which bring together similar building systems. In this sense, the BDCCM has a structure in four levels: area, chapter, subchapter, and group [
57]. In turn, TCPO is structured in five levels: division, subdivision, nature of the item, type, and item [
24]. Each TCPO composition has an individual coding, where the initial sequence represents the phase and the constructive system, and the next sequence indicates the labor, material, equipment, financial costs or activities. Among the building information classification systems adopted can be cited the Andalusia Construction Costs Database by the BCCA [
76], the
Normas Tecnológicas de la Edificación (NTE) by BDCCM [
57] and the MasterFormat that served as the basis for TCPO [
24].
The internal hierarchy of these systems of classification of works and services are directly related to the work breakdown structure (WBS). Thus, as observed in the review, the analytical budget generated according to these cost databases can also be used as a source to identify the constructive phases and the flow of materials and services (inputs and outputs) [
7,
44,
45,
77].
The productive resources can be inputs, machines, services, and labor. The indicators are used to qualify and quantify inputs and labor (description, unit of measure and cost), compositions (description, application, unit of measure and coefficients of consumption and labor) and expenses (direct or indirect). However, the wide variety of inputs and services regarding the nature and method of quantification makes aggregation and comparison difficult in environmental studies, for example, the quantification of inputs and outputs for mass and energy balance. This difficulty is partially circumvented through the adoption of equalization techniques when possible as can be observed in some of the cited articles of the review [
41,
42,
43].
4.2. Findings from the Evaluation of Cost Bases
Table 6 presents the results of the environmental communication assessment matrix of the cost databases by themes and aspects (
Table 1), Equations (1) and (2).
Figure 4 shows the standard results from the environmental communication performance evaluation model over the cost databases, as described in
Table 6. To facilitate comparisons, radar diagrams for global values have been developed for each of the themes covered.
4.3. Interface (Information and Customization)
The six databases are similar in the records classification model and access through electronic sites. However, these same databases present significant differences in some features (e.g., database size, user interface, and communication of the results).
The analysis of the way in which the platform (interface) of the databases can help in the information management and environmental communication used adapted parameters of the PDCA cycle, it traditional in the evaluation of construction projects [
78]. Thus, it was evaluated how the computerized systems and their data and information could contribute to the planning, application, control, and performance in the construction process. Some databases have an integrated computerized system for accessing their records and customizing information entries and exit. In these cases, the manipulation is through of a proprietary software (TCPO and ORSE) or directly in its electronic site (BDCCM). In other databases, the data is summarized in analytical compositions available only in a text file (BCCA) or worksheet (SINAPI) compatible with commercial electronic spreadsheets (e.g., Microsoft Excel).
Moreover, some electronic sites provide auxiliary documents which describe the methodology and classification system. For example, TCPO, ORSE and GP CYPE provide guidance on regulatory references, control procedures and measurement criteria. These regulations and control criteria are limited to issues of quality and safety and occupational health, these ignoring environmental impacts and annoyances generated. Those with computerized systems allow for some level of customization of their database (e.g., features of the enterprise, add new materials, change and create compositions). In the GP CYPE, the user can adjust the characteristics of the construction through the information such as built area, area and number of floors, accessibility and topography conditions, project type (e.g., single family, multifamily), distance to the licensed area for waste disposal, in addition to choosing between 20 types of plant geometry and land occupation.
Some of the systems (TCPO, ORSE and GP CYPE) present a set of construction management tools to support the planning and monitoring of services, tools such as the ABC curve, Gantt chart, and financial physical schedule. SINAPI and BBCA, in turn, do not allow the manipulation of data, only the consultation via an electronic website of the documents describing the service compositions, the methodology (memory), the systematic classification and the price updates collected.
4.4. Resources and Waste
In the selected cost databases, the productive resources comprise items such as materials, construction personnel, and equipment. In the service unit compositions, the concept of consumption adopted is the sum of the theoretical quantity needed for each resource plus the losses along the construction process (acquisition, stock, application) [
24,
60] related to local productivity. This quantity (theoretical and losses) defines the coefficient of consumption per service unit.
The BCCA adopts coefficients of consumption and productivity rates. The other bases (TCPO, ORSE, GP CYPE and BDCCM) allow the choice of consumption and productivity scales. This choice is in agreement with the concept of variable productivity [
24,
66,
79], but limited to the economic dimension. Such an approach could be extended to the concept of environmental performance, which also influenced by productive factors (available technologies, staff qualification, and control systems). In the current model, the productivity range concept allows for estimating economic indicators (costs and time); however, it still does not allow to identify this variation about environmental aspects.
In the database structure, the traditional construction systems and materials, many of them with low environmental performance, are still prevalent, it is addressing the environmental and low impact materials only in isolated cases. In TCPO, for example, materials associated with occupational hazards such as asbestos cement tiles and pipes are listed. Only one chapter among the 17 BCCA addresses environmental services. Even this chapter (Waste Management) does not address the reduction or control of generation, limiting itself to an end-of-pipe control of waste removal: (a) metals, (b) asphalts and tarpaulins, (c) concrete, ceramics, and plaster. In the other bases (TCPO, SINAPI, ORSE, and BDCCM), no chapter was identified to gather such environmental services, those activities such as the removal of waste generated during land clearing or demolition are included in the Preliminary Services stage.
Only CYPE incorporates some system to classify the waste, using a national legal landmarks, Resolution 307 of 2002 by Brazilian National Council of Environment (CONAMA) [
80] and Instruction n°13 by Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) [
81] besides estimating the mass and volume generated.
Even in those few cases where they address the materials and services which can support more sustainable practices, the communication of databases is still driven by the economic dimension. For example, incandescent lamps and LEDs (Light Emitting Diode) are differentiated by cost, while they could also be differentiated by energy efficiency criteria (e.g., energy consumption, lux, durability). In the reuse of materials, as in the case of concrete forms, the information contained in the databases refers more to the cost variation of the activity as a function of material consumption (wood or metal) than to the lower environmental impact.
Some progress can be seen in the adoption of those most popular building systems such as solar capture for thermal and photovoltaic applications. The CYPE GP and BDCCM provide chapters which bring together complete solar systems (capture, storage, and distribution) while on the ORSE only a few isolated activities. At the SINAPI base, in turn, no solar pickup services were identified, despite being an energy source that has been encouraged through financing from the Caixa Econômica Federal itself, the SINAPI maintainer.
It is observed that the few environmental actions identified in the databases have any associated economic advantage that is easily perceived by the builders or future users. This is the case in the cited examples of the use of more efficient light bulbs and the adoption of solar heating for showers (reduction of the energy bill), reuse of the forms of wood for concrete (reduction of the cost of acquiring wood).
4.5. Public Services (Urban Infrastructure)
The resources and services provided by the urban infrastructure (facilities) participate in the cost bases in a different way from those productive resources acquired in the construction suppliers (inputs and services). Inputs of origin in the construction market generally have their costs identified and quantified in each of the unitary compositions of which they are part. On the other hand, items such as water and energy are neglected despite these being present in most constructive activities and with significant environmental impacts [
21].
In most of the bases, the consumption of water and energy are not quantified per service and are often considered as simple expenses linked to administrative activities. The lack of quantification of water and energy consumption makes it difficult not only to estimate the demand for these resources, but also makes it unfeasible to use control tools such as the ABC curve to analyze the total consumption [
82,
83], or the S curve to study their consumption over time [
84].
An analysis of the compositions of the cited databases found that many of their processes demand water for various uses: as input to be added (e.g., production of concrete and mortar, dilution and paints); as facilitator (e.g., sprinklers control the humidity of aggregates and reduce dust emissions); and potable water for worker.
The results were classified and grouped by use and activities. The first group brought together the water use in traditional construction activities (e.g., foundation, structure, fences, and finishes), where it is usually incorporated into the constructive piece. The second group brought together those activities of higher water demand, such as earth moving, deep foundations and surface cleaning. The third group was the use of water by the construction site (e.g., to maintain its facilities and reducing dust) and drinking water consumption by workers.
In the first group (traditional constructive activities), only GP CYPE and BDCCM consider water consumption as a variable cost, which would allow analyzing both water demand per service and comparing it between different services. In the other bases analyzed (TCPO, SINAPI, and ORSE) water consumption is considered only as a fixed expense.
In the second group (services with high water demand), only the BCCA shows water as a variable cost in the unitary composition of the activities. However, the BCCA addresses the use of potable water even for earthmoving services, when it could encourage the use of reuse water, for example. A search on the BCCA identified 67 citations related to the potable water as an input, most of them in ground compaction services (using a tanker truck), foundation piles (by drilling or drilling), surface cleaning by blasting, landscaping. In the BDCCM and GP CYPE, the cost of water was not directly identified, only in those services of movement and compaction it is indirectly predicted through the cost of the tanker truck. In TCPO and ORSE the consumption and cost of water are not evidenced in their compositions.
Among the three, the third group of water use (construction site) was the one that showed less control over the water consumption, whereas the bases did not present indicators to monitor the water demand of the construction site activities.
The approach to energy consumption was like that applied to water consumption. Despite the use of energy is associated with those electrical machines and equipment (e.g., compressors, elevators, chainsaws) contained in the cost compositions, the analyzed bases considered the consumption of electric energy as an expense instead of a variable cost of the activity.
In the review of the environmental literature, some strategies seek to fill this lack of quantitative data to estimate water and energy consumption. Gangolells et al. [
21] combined statistical data about water and energy consumption by area constructed with the quantities of construction services. Souza [
46] estimated the water demand from standard quantities, services specifications, technical recommendations, and the worker numbers.
4.6. Machinery, Transport Services and Pollution
TCPO adopted the term “machines” for heavy equipment (e.g., excavators, cargo lifts, cranes, pile drivers) and the term “tool” for small equipment owned by the operator.
It was observed that in heavy-duty activities it is common for the composition to carry the name of the main machine. While, in those activities which involve vehicles to support their execution, the composition is named according to the function performed by these vehicles (transportation, loading, and unloading). In the databases, in general, the larger machines and vehicles and their compositions are grouped into specific chapters, such as the chapter “Machines, Vehicles and Equipment” in TCPO, “Infrastructure” in the ORSE, in the class “Cost machinery and equipment” at SINAPI, and “Machinery” at BCCA and BDCCM.
The circulation of machines and equipment contributes for generating several impacts and nuisances in the direct environment (neighborhood) and in the urban space. Among these externalities, it is the emission of smoke, noise, and vibration. However, the databases analyzed do not show environmental indicators that could be used to control these impacts.
Diesel oil consumption data by activity were identified in 129 TCPO compositions, wherein they consider the productive time of the machines and equipment. However, in these compositions, no references to associated terms such as “smoke” or “pollution” have been identified in their enforcement procedures. In the other bases (SINAPI, ORSE, CYPE, BCCA, and BDCCM), no fuel consumption data were found.
In the search, the term vibration was ordinarily associated with the description of those machines involved (e.g., self-propelled roller, vibratory plate compactor, immersion vibrator) or for achieving some requirements in the concrete pieces (e.g., density, consistency). In the databases, no vibration control procedures were identified, even for those pile driving and demolition activities. Exceptions were the activities involving the use of explosives and risks to the site and surrounding areas, which require planning the sequence of the service to reduce risks [
24].
An alternative to estimating these aspects would be to use a combination of intensity and time factors. For example, fuel consumption would serve as a basis for estimating air pollution (burning of gases and smoke), noise generation rate to estimate noise pollution and the operating time of some machines to estimate nuisance from vibration.
4.7. Safety and Health (Occupational)
The analyzed cost databases present the same standard for labor classification and quantification. Demand for labor is classified according to the professional activity (e.g., masons, carpenters, electricians) which is assigned a unit cost per hour (man-hour).
The direct cost of labor is the sum of each professional’s time multiplied by their estimated time for that activity, also considering the productivity patterns inherent to the activity and the team and technologies involved [
24]. Thus, knowing the amount of each activity may be extracted the workers’ times in a global way or by professional activity allowing to estimate the labor costs and to estimate the teams. In general, work safety programs use the size of these staffs and the risks normally associated with these professional activities to plan the demand for protective equipment (individual and collective), as well as for planning the training, supervision and control actions.
Considering that they adopt the professional profile as a key criterion for classifying the labor demand, the structure of these databases may lead users to ignore important factors such as working conditions and risk exposure. In their descriptions, the TCPO, ORSE and GP CYPE databases address the executive regulations and procedure of each activity applicable to environmental health and safety issues In the bases analyzed, the main safety standard is the NR-18 Working Conditions and Environment in the Construction Industry [
85]. The description of the activities mentions several of the physical, chemical and biological hazards associated with the construction that are listed by NR-18 (e.g., electric shock, collapse, particle projection, explosion, falling objects, falling height).
However, quantitative data that would allow measuring these risks were not found, therefore, restricting the choice of safety measures according to subjective criteria. This approach does not distinguish those cases where the same activity performed under different conditions may present different risks. For example, the same exterior facade coating activity has different risks when performed on the ground floor compared to that performed on higher floors. In this sense, cost bases could, in addition to informing the risk according to the activity worker profile, also inform the risks according to the working conditions and exposure to the risk (e.g., fall in height, fall of objects).
4.8. Overall Results
Table 7 presents the normalized performance values by theme according to Equation (2) and the global values for each analyzed cost base obtained with Equation (3).
In general, cost databases were low performing in most aspects of environmental communication, especially data on water and energy consumption, use of machines and emission of pollution emission, and information related to occupational health and safety. The group consumption of water and energy was the one that presented the worst result according to the averages of performance of the selected cost bases. In fact, except for BCCA, the other bases consider water and energy consumption as an expense without presenting a method to quantify it as a function of the volume of activities.
Figure 5 shows the performance of each cost basis for the global values according to the defined evaluation aspects.
Considering the six bases, the CYPE Price Generator (GP CYPE) was the one that presented a better score, registering 3.1 points, followed by the Table of Compositions of Prices for Budgets (TCPO) of the Editora Pini and the System of Budget of Works of Sergipe (ORSE), both with 2.3 points.
In the group with the intermediate results were the regional bases of Spain, the Base of Prices of the Construction of the Community of Madrid (BDCCM) with 1.8 points and the Base of Costs of the Construction of Andalusia (BCCA), with 1.5 points. The worst performance was the National System for Costing and Indices of Civil Construction (SINAPI), with an overall performance of only 1 point.
5. Conclusions
This article performed an analysis of a set of cost bases for identifying relationships between cost data and environmental information. Firstly, it carried out a systematic review of the international literature on cost bases in environmental studies, followed by documentary analysis of the programs of the engineering courses to survey the most cited cost bases. This first step characterized the state of the art and state of the technique for definition of the collection and data analysis model. Then, an environmental communication assessment matrix was applied to the selected cost databases. Finally, the performance results of each cost base were compared.
The use of cost bases in environmental studies has been increasing in recent decades. However, as observed in the literature review applied, it was verified that such bases are adopted as an auxiliary tool to fill the lack of quantitative data in some instruments of environmental assessment. Thus, from the structure and data of these cost databases are extracted information which combined with environmental analysis tools allow for obtaining environmental indicators such as consumption of resources (materials, water, and energy), generation of waste and pollution emission. This process could be better systematized if the cost bases incorporated direct environmental indicators instead of requiring correlations with other instruments. This action would also improve the dissemination of environmental information among its users.
A documentary analysis has identified that such cost databases are one relevant content in the education of Brazilian civil engineering according to the pedagogical projects of their courses. However, it was observed a concentration in few bases and a low integration with environmental themes. Although the analysis was applied to a wide range of courses (one for each of the 27 units of the Brazilian federation) to cover possible regional differences, the results show that the citations are restricted to only three bases, all of them of national scope: the Price Composition Table (TCPO), the National System of Costs Survey and Indices of Civil Construction (SINAPI), and the System of Reference Costs of Works (SICRO). Among the three bases cited by the 27 Brazilian courses selected, TCPO obtained the highest number of citations, with 21 occurrences (78%), well above SINAPI, with 4 cases, and SICRO, with only 3 cases.
In contrast, while in the analysis of the programs of the courses in Brazil the bases mentioned were national in scope, in the review of the literature, the regional bases in Spain prevailed, such as the Base of Costs of the Construction of Andalusia (BCCA) and the Base of Prices of the Construction of the Community of Madrid (BCCM).
Other findings come from the asymmetry of the correlation of databases with topics such as construction management and environmental management. The cost databases have a high affinity with themes such as physical-financial planning of the work, 85% of the cases. However, the same databases present an association of only 7% to environmental issues, such as waste management (1 case) and life-cycle assessment (1 case). These results point to the need to revise the course programs as a strategy to improve the insertion of the environmental dimension in the education of engineers and in their professional practice.
Finally, the application of the evaluation matrix of the environmental communication allowed mapping the performance of the cost bases according to the selected themes and the comparison among those. It was observed that, although the analyzed cost bases have similar structures for the classification of the records, they are very different as regards the quality of the environmental information according to the evaluation criteria applied by research.
The CYPE Price Generator, international coverage, presented the best results followed by TCPO, national coverage, both cost bases are maintained by private institutions. The ORSE registered the third best performance, which is maintained by the public sector and of regional coverage (State of Sergipe in Brazil). The second group had the worst performers. The regional bases of Spain, Base of Costs of the Construction of Andalusia (BCCA) and Base of Prices of the Construction of the Community of Madrid (BDCCM), had intermediate performance. The National System for Research in Costs and Indices of Civil Construction (SINAPI), maintained by public agent, registered the worst performance among the six cost bases analyzed.
It is important to note that the bases of the regions of Spain of Andalusia and Madrid are part of initiatives of local governments to promote the improvement of the performance of the regional construction sector. Such a strategy could be extended to improve tools in other local contexts. SINAPI in Brazil has a great potential for disseminating environmental information in the national construction sector as it is a mandatory reference in constructions financed with federal government resources and has a wide data collection structure, maintained by the Caixa Econômica Federal (CEF) and by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE).
According to the results, the use of computerized systems can contribute to improved access to data, the search for indicators and the generation of more complete reports aimed at improving the quality of information and guiding building practices. In this sense also, the sector in Brazil needs a consolidated model for the classification of construction data in order to facilitate the collection and communication of data to users and other management systems. The agents involved in the development of these tools have an important role in this action, considering that these systems reach a large public of users of the construction sector, comprising students in training (graduates and technicians), budgeting, planning engineers and managers.
The results point to the confirmation of the initial hypothesis, in which traditional tools such as cost bases can contribute beyond the economic management of the construction process. These cost bases, incorporating new indicators, can help to plan and control local impacts and increase the environmental awareness of construction agents aiming at lower impact sites.