A Business Model in Spa Tourism Enterprises: Case Study from Poland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Method
4. Results
4.1. The Structure and Chararcetistics of a Business Model in Modern Spas
- market character (through the marketization of spa services and the change of the existing therapeutic form of activity into tourist and healing activity, methods of financing, and scope of services for spa guests),
- product character (e.g., due to the fashion for a healthy lifestyle and the transformation of a traditional spa product, which allowed us to offer a mixed form of a spa product and openness to tourists), and
- ownership character (e.g., through privatization of state-owned spa enterprises, which changed the social perspective of conducting spa business into a perspective focused primarily on the economic result).
- the profitability of commercial guests’ stays (individual and business), which is much higher than that of contractual guests;
- the marginal impact of the contractual guest on the conditions of stay and its settlement (the direct payer is the insurer and not the direct beneficiary of the treatment).
4.2. The Needs and Expectations Towards Value Proposition of Spa Visitors and Potential Clients
5. Discussion
- (a)
- Perspective I is oriented towards the creation of value for the enterprise, which uses the criterion of model division based on the type of recipient of services, with the two dominating groups of recipients:
- insurers (financing the stay of spa patients from insurance funds),
- individual and business recipients (self-financing the stay).
- (b)
- Perspective II focuses on customer value creation, which uses the criterion of model division based on the type of health resort product in which dominates:
- traditional form of a spa product (spa treatment),
- a modern form of a spa product (mixed).
- implementation of the social objective (implementation of the health policy while limiting the load of the area with tourist traffic and eliminating overtourism),
- achieving primarily an economic objective (market, profit or other).
6. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Szromek, A.R. Development of health tourism in Polish spas in the context of air pollution, an aging population and changes in business models. In Proceedings of the 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2018, Albena, Bulgaria, 30 June–9 July 2018; Volume 18, pp. 199–206. [Google Scholar]
- Szromek, A.R. Changes in the management model of health care institutions in health resorts in the context of social and economic changes in the years 1989–2018. Health Prim. Care 2018, 2, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malara, Z. Przedsiębiorstwo w Globalnej Gospodarce; Wyzwania współczesności, PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2007; pp. 12–14. [Google Scholar]
- Nogalski, B. Modele biznesu jako narzędzia reorientacji strategicznej przedsiębiorstw. Master Bus. Adm. 2009, 17, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
- Lucas, R.C.; Stankey, G.H. Role of Research in Applying the Limits of Acceptable Change System. In Proceedings of the Southern Recreation Research Conference, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA, 28 February–1 March 1985; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Aall, C.; Dodds, R.; Sælensminde, I.; Brendehaug, E. Introducing the concept of environmental policy integration into the discourse on sustainable tourism: A way to improve policy-making and implementation? J. Sustain. Tour. 2015, 23, 977–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, R.W. The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Can. Geogr. 1980, 24, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szromek, A.R.; Kapczyński, A. Hypotheses concerning the development of Polish spas in the years 1949–2006. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 1035–1037. [Google Scholar]
- Lindberg, K.; McCool, S.; Stankey, G. Rethinking Carrying Capactiy. Ann. Tour. Res. 2007, 24, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruczek, Z.; Kruczek, M.; Szromek, A.R. Possibilities of Using the Tourism Area Life Cycle Model to Understand and Provide Sustainable Solution for Tourism Development in the Antarctic Region. Sustainability 2018, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodds, R.; Butler, R. (Eds.) OVERTOURISM. Issues, Realities and Solutions. De Gruyter Studies in Tourism; De Gruyter Oldenbourg: Berlin, Germany, 2019; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Szromek, A.R.; Romaniuk, P.; Hadzik, A. The privatization of spa companies in Poland—An evaluation of policy assumptions and implementation. Health Policy 2016, 120, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szromek, A.R.; Herman, K. A Business Creation in Post-Industrial Tourism Objects: Case of the Industrial Monuments Route. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirtz, B.; Pistoia, A.; Ullrich, S.; Gottel, V. Business Models: Origin, Development and Future Research Perspectives. Long Range Plan. 2016, 49, 36–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konczal, E. Models are for Managers, not Mathematicians. J. Syst. Manag. 1975, 26, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
- Magretta, J. Why business models matter? Harv. Bus. Rev. 2002, 80, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Teece, D. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Plan. 2018, 51, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battistella, C.; Toni, A.; Zan, G.; Pessot, E. Cultivating business model agility through focused capabilities: Amultiple case study. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 73, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prendeville, S.; Bocken, N. Sustainable Business Models through Service Design. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 8, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Evans, S. The Cambridge Business Model Innovation Process. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 8, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, W.; Christensen, C.; Kagerman, H. Reinventing Your Business Model. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2008, 86, 57–68. [Google Scholar]
- Falencikowski, T. Strategia a model biznesu—podobieństwa i różnice. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 2012, 260, 80–93. [Google Scholar]
- Rusu, B. The Impact of Innovations on the Business Model: Exploratory Analysis of a Small Travel Agency. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 221, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiśniewski, A. Konstrukcja Modeli biznesu. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici Zarządzanie 2017, 44, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Debei, M.; El-Haddadeh, R.; Avison, D. Defining the Business Model in the New World of Digital Business. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, 14–17 August 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Iwasieczko, B. Modele biznesowe i ocena czynników ich efektywności. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 2014, 343, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souto, J. Business model innovation and business concept innovation as the context of incremental innovation and radical innovation. Tour. Manag. 2015, 51, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodenau, A. Innovative Value of Sustainable Tourism Practices. In Proceedings of the 22nd Nordic Symposium in Tourism and Hospitality Research, Bodø, Norway, 24–27 September 2013; pp. 23–25. [Google Scholar]
- Mantaguti, F.; Mingotto, E. Innovative business models within niche tourist markets: Shared identity, authenticity and flexible networks. The case of three Italian SMEs. J. Tour. Res. 2016, 6, 9–10. [Google Scholar]
- Cranmer, E.; Jung, T.; Dieck, M.C.T. The Value of Augmented Reality from a Business Model Perspective. e-Review of Tourism Research. February 2017. Available online: https://ertr.tamu.edu/ (accessed on 9 December 2017).
- Ciurea, C.; Filip, F.G. Validation of a Business Model for Cultural Heritage Institutions. Informatica Economică 2015, 19, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Tourism and the Creative Economy. In OECD Studies on Tourism; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2014; p. 25. [Google Scholar]
- Prebensen, N.; Dahl, J. Value co-creation significance of tourist resources. Ann. Tour. Res. 2013, 42, 240–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaconu, M.; Dutu, A. Business model in the hospitality industry, from traditional to open innovation. Sci. Bull. Econ. Sci. 2014, 16, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
- Knop, L.; Brzóska, J. Rola innowacji w tworzeniu wartości poprzez modele biznesu. Zeszyty Naukowe Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska 2016, 99, 215–217. [Google Scholar]
- Gordijn, J.; Akkermans, H. Business models for distributed generation in a liberalized market environment. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2007, 77, 1178–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chesbrough, H. Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 172–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, S. Transport for Tourism. In A Companion to Tourism; Lew, A.A., Hall, C.M., Williams, A.M., Eds.; Black-well: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 146–158. [Google Scholar]
- Żemła, M.; Szromek, A.R. Preference for domestic offer in tourism among students in central European countries. Eur. J. Tour. Hosp. Recreat. 2014, 5, 183–196. [Google Scholar]
- Jansen-Verbeke, M.; Spee, R. A regional analysis of tourist flows within Europe. Tour. Manag. 1995, 16, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cater, E. Ecotourism: Theory and practice. In A Companion to Tourism; Lew, A.A., Hall, C.M., Williams, A.M., Eds.; Black-well: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 484–497. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Qu, H. A comparison study of Chinese domestic tourism: China vs. the USA. International. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2004, 16, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragavan, N.A.; Subramonian, H.; Sharif, S.P. Tourists’ perceptions of destination travel attributes: An application to International tourists to Kuala Lumpur. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 144, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozak, M. Comparative assessment of tourist satisfaction with destinations across two nationalities. Tour. Manag. 2001, 22, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akama, J.S. Measuring tourist satisfaction with Kenya’s wildlife safari: A case study of Tsavo West National Park. Tour. Manag. 2003, 24, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ángeles Oviedo-García, M.; Vega-Vázquez, M.; Castellanos-Verdugo, M.; Orgaz-Agüera, F. Tourism in protected areas and the impact of services cape on tourist satisfaction, key in sustainability. Tour. Manag. 2019, 12, 74–83. [Google Scholar]
- Hea, X.; Hua, D.; Swanson, S.R.; Su, L.; Chenc, X. Destination perceptions, relationship quality, and tourist environmentally responsible behavior. Tour. Manag. 2018, 28, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osterwalder, A.; Pigneur, Y. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; p. 190. [Google Scholar]
- Greenacre, M.; Hastie, T. The Geometric Interpretation of Correspondence Analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1987, 82, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kendall, M.G. Multivariete Analysis; Charles Griffin: London, UK, 1975; pp. 3–198. [Google Scholar]
- Stanisz, A. (Ed.) Biostatystyka; Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego: Kraków, Poland, 2005; pp. 109–409. [Google Scholar]
- Dryglas, D.; Salamaga, M. Segmentation by push motives in health tourism destinations: A case study of Polish spa resorts. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2018, 9, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szromek, A.R. Revitalization of Polish spas. In Tourism in the New Eastern Europe Global Challenges—Regional Answer; College of Tourism and Hospitality Management: Warszawa, Poland, 2008; pp. 115–118. [Google Scholar]
THE MODERN STRUCTURE OF THE BUSINESS MODEL OF A HEALTH RESORT ENTERPRISE | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key partners
| Key activities
| Value proposition The core of the spa product:
| Relations with the customers
| Customer segments Consumers:
| |
Key resources
| Channels Spa patients
| ||||
Cost structure
| Revenue streams Sources: contracts with insurers, individual and group patients, entrepreneurs, sports organizations. Values:
|
Attributes That Make for a Successful a Spa Stay | Point Out Percentage |
---|---|
The quality of medical care and treatment | 65.5% |
The quality of accommodation | 63.3% |
A wide range of treatment | 40.8% |
The quality of gastronomy | 26.8% |
Beautiful views | 24.1% |
Peace and quiet | 17.3% |
A wide range of tourist attractions available | 12.9% |
Cleanness of the park and its charm | 7.1% |
The costs of treatments | 6.8% |
The possibility to socialize with other visitors | 6.6% |
A wide range of local culture attractions | 4.4% |
Transportation (accessibility, parking lot) | 4.1% |
The accommodation cost | 3.3% |
Cleanness of the streets | 2.7% |
Entertainment (cinema, dancing) | 2.5% |
Safety of the location (low crime rate) | 1.1% |
Mass events, concerts, carnivals | 0.0% |
Other | 0.8% |
Value Proposition That Enriches a Spa Stay | All Research Participants | Participants Who Attend to Spas (TS) | Participants Who Do Not Attend to Spas (PT) |
---|---|---|---|
Increasing the standards of accommodation and sustenance | 51.0% | 51.2% | 50.5% |
Increasing the standard of medical care (better medical, nurturing and rehabilitation care) | 42.9% | 40.0% | 49.0% * |
Increasing the standard of spa treatment (other treatments) | 42.8% | 42.9% | 42.4% |
Treating the visitor like a special “guest” and not like a “patient” | 32.4% | 27.8% | 41.9% * |
Introducing only single and marital rooms into the offer | 25.3% | 22.4% | 31.3% * |
Developing cultural activities (cinema, library, concerts) | 24.7% | 18.0% | 38.4% ** |
Abolishing extra fees for premature treatment cancelation caused by feeling unwell | 18.1% | 13.4% | 27.8% |
Introducing a transport service for the spa visitors from home to spa and back (door to door) | 15.0% | 14.1% | 16.7% |
Introducing psychological care and free time animators’ service in spas | 12.2% | 9.0% | 18.7% |
Organising child care for small children so that a mother can take part in a treatment | 12.0% | 6.6% | 23.2% |
Introducing classes and lectures for spa visitors (senior universities or meetings with interesting personalities) | 9.7% | 6.8% | 15.7% |
Introducing spiritual care during spa stay (retreats, pilgrimage) | 2.8% | 1.2% | 6.1% |
The Most Important Values for Visitor During a Spa Stay | Answer Percentage |
---|---|
Sustaining or improving health conditions by applying natural healing resources (raw materials) | 66.0% |
Resting in a place where the climate has therapeutic properties | 38.7% |
Achieving relaxing effects of treatment (better state of being, rest, beauty, weight loss, condition and sport’s performance improvement) | 29.8% |
Health, physical and emotional (mental/spiritual) safety provided by medical care. | 17.0% |
The opportunity to socialise and get entertained (chats, games, trips) | 15.9% |
The opportunity to participate in various forms of tourism | 8.6% |
Cultural and spiritual experiences, gained through attending concerts and religious ceremonies | 2.8% |
Other | 0.0% |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Szromek, A.R.; Naramski, M. A Business Model in Spa Tourism Enterprises: Case Study from Poland. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2880. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102880
Szromek AR, Naramski M. A Business Model in Spa Tourism Enterprises: Case Study from Poland. Sustainability. 2019; 11(10):2880. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102880
Chicago/Turabian StyleSzromek, Adam R., and Mateusz Naramski. 2019. "A Business Model in Spa Tourism Enterprises: Case Study from Poland" Sustainability 11, no. 10: 2880. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102880
APA StyleSzromek, A. R., & Naramski, M. (2019). A Business Model in Spa Tourism Enterprises: Case Study from Poland. Sustainability, 11(10), 2880. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102880